-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bfe/c2bfe667981fc3475d21b8d0b0e6b2067b323b99" alt=""
@ Taggart :donor:
2025-02-27 04:23:52
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqz3zckw6u2060jflmwehgfhp6m7u6u0svzcppljfu8t7qjc6wmzfq43pvpy nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqcu4r6pt94plck34vtw9t3zj974k0vl0z8x9gew5vdp2ukw3ekr4qct2mzm Yours is a very charitable reading of the clause. But let's consider Mozilla's recent behavior, and ask how much good faith is due. Can you imagine no more expansive interpretation of this language?
I've spent the night reading browser Terms. Not a one includes a clause like this. They do explicitly call out GDPR, which this oddly does not (the Privacy Policy does have appropriate EU affordances). You know what does use this language?
Facebook.