-
@ 9cbe03db:b51ada16
2025-05-19 16:45:07
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 the MSM fight right until they are nailed into their coffin. https://image.nostr.build/fffc90b91cf1e980f782c3bf5ced51d034e9a789bcef09fbce828dd28df77afc.jpg
#truth #truthmatters #news #politics
-
@ 274fe9ae:565805d2
2025-05-19 16:45:05
European stocks subdued as corporate news outweighs US credit downgrade
https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/european-stocks-slip-as-us-credit-downgrade-china-data-weigh-4051999
-
@ 3493b0c2:4ce7120f
2025-05-19 16:45:04
Mon - May 19 - 09:45 AM - PDT
// bit.site
✅ Connection successful: node-1.ipfs.bit.site 4001
// pinnable.xyz
✅ Connection successful: 167.71.172.216 4001
✅ Connection successful: 188.166.180.196 4001
✅ Connection successful: 143.198.18.166 4001
// 4everland.io
✅ Connection successful: node-1.ipfs.4everland.net 4001
-
@ aa4fc866:b098c7b4
2025-05-19 16:45:02
Bitcoin price: $104894, Sats per USD: 953
-
@ ececfb14:f2074a9a
2025-05-19 16:45:02
アイス……あんこ……
:meow_droolreach:
-
@ e9ab3129:9c2d0b6d
2025-05-19 16:45:00
GM Urges The Senate To Kill California's 2035 EV Rules
GM Urges The Senate To Kill California's 2035 EV Rules
https://mishtalk.com/economics/gm-urges-the-senate-to-kill-californias-2035-ev-rules/
GM once supported California’s 2035 EV target. It wisely has second thoughts...
https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/GM-abandoned-its-own-target.jpg?itok=DwtfR9wN
Sanity Prevails
In 2022, California Governor Gavin Newsom approved regulations banning the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035. GM foolishly supported the idea.
I am pleased to report that sanity has prevailed. The Wall Street Journal reports https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/california-ev-mandate-auto-industry-64708033?mod=hp_lead_pos1
“We need your help!” GM said in an email it sent this past week to thousands of its white-collar employees. “Emissions standards that are not aligned with market realities pose a serious threat to our business by undermining consumer choice and vehicle affordability.”
GM, one of the biggest sellers of EVs in the U.S., is encouraging employees to use scripted talking points to lobby Senators. The goal is to nullify a 2022 California measure that would ban the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035, a mandate that has since been adopted by 11 other states. The Senate could vote as early as next week to revoke a waiver that allows California to set its own stricter tailpipe-emissions standards.
GM set its own internal goal of ending sales of nearly all gas-only vehicles by 2035 and initially supported the California target, while advocating for a uniform national standard.
But the EV market has taken a turn. Three years ago, U.S. automakers couldn’t keep up with demand; now EV sales are beginning to sputter. Discounts are drying up, car buyers are seeking lower-priced alternatives, and Congress is looking to roll back tax credits that for years have powered electric-vehicle sales.
GM abandoned a self-imposed target to build 400,000 electric vehicles by mid-2024, and last year the company said it would delay plans for a new Buick electric vehicle and push back the opening of an EV truck factory. Ford Motor and other automakers have similarly scaled back plans.
“GM believes in customer choice, and we continue to focus on offering the best and broadest portfolio of vehicles on the market,” the spokeswoman said.
The turn against California’s mandate has been bipartisan. When the U.S. House passed a bill identical to the Senate’s earlier this month, 35 Democrats supported the legislation, including two from California.
Rep. Laura Gillen, a Democrat from New York, one of the states to adopt the mandate, said she supports the goal of reducing emissions but that the timeline is “out of touch with reality” and an undue burden on consumers facing a cost-of-living crisis.
“If everybody in my district went out and got an EV, the grid could not accommodate that,” Gillen said.
Hoot of the Day
GM now supports customer choice. Fancy that.
Republicans are using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) which allows Congress to review and potentially overturn federal agency rules.
The maneuver only needs a simple majority and is thus filibuster-proof. Thus, the CRA should pass the Senate easily.
There may be a legal challenge, but I expect Trump will prevail on this one if there is a challenge. If seven Democrats sign on, then this can pass by normal legislation.
Eleven states have adopted California’s mandate and if Democrats take the White House again, they may adopt more nonsensical EV rules.
So it’s best to get 60 votes. But 4 years of sanity is better than none.
https://cms.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden
Mon, 05/19/2025 - 12:45
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/gm-urges-senate-kill-californias-2035-ev-rules
-
@ d7c13d1e:14cfe365
2025-05-19 16:45:00
✄------------ 1:45 ------------✄
-
@ 9811a6e1:504d55c9
2025-05-19 16:44:58
Разговор Путина и Трампа завершился, он длился более двух часов
Разговор президента России Владимира Путина и главы США Дональда Трампа длился более двух часов. https://russian.rt.com/world/news/1480227-putin-tramp-rahzgovor?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS
https://russian.rt.com/world/news/1480227-putin-tramp-rahzgovor?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS
-
@ 273e7880:0a90f8d2
2025-05-19 16:44:58
🔥 This Week's Bitcoin Borrowing & Lending Deals 🔥
Lend at Hodl Hodl allows you to lend and/or borrow from others anonymously, on your own terms.
🟠No middlemen, just #P2P freedom.
Take control of your financial sovereignty!
#Bitcoin #BitcoinBackedLoans #Stablecoins
https://blossom.primal.net/d73ec824b28a7f0d6d3b32bedff81308c87dbf0632e7e748e2f4420b3f3c8fad.jpg
-
@ 35cdc3a9:f4db216e
2025-05-19 16:44:57
Go 🤘
-
@ d794594f:4769efd2
2025-05-19 16:44:57
"Como não encontram respostas do sistema político (...) tornam-se socialmente ressentidas."
Nem mais nem menos.
#🥸
-
@ c6c345e9:f2819f1c
2025-05-19 16:44:56
It really looks like the return of the UK back to the EU has started.
Brexit has been biggest disaster for the UK orchestrated by right wing who based it on lies and misinformation.
Sooner we return to EU the better I will get my European citizenship back!
-
@ 35cdc3a9:f4db216e
2025-05-19 16:45:07
Go 🤙
-
@ 74ffc51c:1d6d1856
2025-05-19 16:44:20
Clarification of my thoughts and a brief explanation of how I get to where I am currently for anyone interested:
Miners and nodes were originally pretty much the same thing.
They aren't now.
What happens when the incentives of miners and the incentives of nodes become misaligned?
Miners want to get revenue from any source imaginable - stuffing spam into blocks is potentially lucrative.
Nodes of course do not have any immediate incentive to relay this stuff and certainly don't benefit from storing it or competing with it and paying higher transaction fees as a result.
The theme coming from
@darosior
is that Core must do what is incentive compatible for *miners* - i.e pay attention to what it is spammers want to store in the chain and quickly or preemptively adapt Bitcoin Core as quickly as possible to relay this to prevent any large miner soliciting it out-of-band and developing a competitive edge against miners who are "stuck" with the transactions being relayed around the network.
His concern compounds with the idea that if Core fails to do this, it will be unadopted and lose market share to an implementation that does.
However we have seen significant migration away from Core, for perhaps the first time ever, to Knots, which takes a different approach - it concerns itself with the incentives of people running those nodes who, as mentioned, do not wish to be relaying junk data around the network and storing it for free.
So if we are concerning ourselves with the incentive compatibility of Bitcoin Core, why is the incentive the actual users of that software to not participate in spam not a part of the discussion when it is so clearly relevant? Knots has jumped to about 10% of the listening nodes over the course of May from less than 2% before that.
This, I believe, is where the rift between Core and those angry with Core formed because Core's response to this is generally to say that nodes are being short-sighted. Their desire to reject spam is going to undermine more subtle things in the longer term. This was expressed initially in a crude and insulting manner which further deepened the rift but - no matter how much we might want to dismiss them as genius devs somehow missing the forest for the tress - are they correct?
More simply - are nodes doing themselves a disservice by opting out of the relaying of spam in the hopes that at the very least, they aren't participating in the hypershitcoinization of Bitcoin?
How bad are the tradeoffs for nodes if they do this?
1. If Core is "incentive incompatible" (at least with regard to miners/spammers who both clearly want to use Bitcoin to store non-Bitcoin stuff) is there going to be un-adoption of Core?
So far the only un-adoption we have seen is a (from my perspective) a few thousand nodes switching from Core to Knots - this isn't really fakeable like some suggest with AWS because you'd have need to have spun up Core nodes far in advance of this battle in order to send this signal by having them switch.
The "incentive compatible" alternative is Libre Relay - this of course does the opposite of what Knots and its updated filters permit - it preferentially peers with fellow trash-enjoying nodes in what is (to my mind) a misguided effort to fight what they call censorship. Of course I fundamentally believe that censorship resistance doesn't come in the shape of nodes relaying what is against their own interest.
Libre Relay is nowhere near as widely adopted as Knots. So Core, if wanting to maintain marketshare must take more into consideration what has actually happened to Core as a result of its incentive incompatible design (from the perspective of *nodes* rather than *miners*).
They must convince us that Knots users are making a mistake in philosophy, not just more immediate concerns around practicalities and risks of running something that isn't Core. Those are valid of course but let's assume Core and Knots are of equivalent standard and reliability and just focus on differences in approach and design philosophy here as its what is relevant to this discussion.
2. If we filter spam, fee estimation will get worse.
It can get better actually, assuming there is one decently sized miner on the network respecting those filters. There is of course - most of the DATUM miners on OCEAN use Knots with fairly close to default policy so this can prevent you from *overpaying* fees.
The worsening of fee estimation in the other context - accidentally underpaying because there's so much unconfirmed spam that you just aren't aware of - is much easier to correct for. Simple RBF will suffice.
I don't think it's anything anyone can really care about due to the unpredictable nature of the blockchain anyway. You have no idea if you'll be in the next block or not. The extent to which you do is the extent to which we "know" what *should* be in the next block which is basically just an artifact of centralization and a mistaken celebration of that fact.
You don't know who will find the next block, what will be in it, how long it will take, or how many other people are going to jump in "the" queue after you broadcast your transaction. Core's heuristic around fees work well without knowledge of other people's mempools, this is by design. Thus, I have widely asserted that concerns around fee estimation are nonsense with the above reasoning and I have yet to have anyone dunk on me with some superior understanding.
3. Block Propagation will be slower if we filter spam. Mining will centralize in general.
Slower block propagation sucks for small miners trying to be part of the big club as Antoine points out. The big boys will have a private intra-relay network - a walled garden in which you must belong to not be at a disadvantage with necessarily slower verification times.
Firstly - if you filter something that still generally makes its way around the network, you'll cache it and your verification speed will be just as quick as if you didn't filter so this is a non-argument. I genuinely think most people, including Core devs are just unaware of `blockreconstructionextratxn` so they believe there to be an issue that there just isn't.
But what if the filters are so effective that the private club has to solicit this stuff out-of-band and it never existed in the first place to the filtering nodes?
Then I say we are screwed. These miners control the blockchain at that point. We have concerns orders of magnitude more significant. They can reorg the chain, make double spends and generally wreak havoc. The fact that they haven't is not something we can rely on hence the need to actually decentralize mining not just screw around and make a gesture of concern in relaxing spam filters in the hopes that it doesn't get slightly worse.
We are at this point already so I have no idea why we are discussing inconsequential factors such as spam mitigation vs enthusiastic relaying as though it has any relevance here. Foundry can already 51% attack the network.
---------
This is roughly how I end up at my position - being a vocal advocate for putting the incentives of those running nodes over anyone else in the ecosystem. I do not consider spammers to be "Bitcoiners" but even I did, their needs would be always placed further down the food chain than those of nodes. Just as they were with those who wanted huge blocks for permanently cheap transactions.
The rate at which I am having to revise and reevaluate my position has rapidly decreased compared to a few weeks ago where admittedly I was making far more technical inaccuracies than now.
Everything I read from Greg Maxwell or other long standing and respected developers in the space goes along familiar lines at this point and fails to justify this new, laissez-faire approach to spam attacks that carries a heavy burden of proof versus adhering (as Knots does) to Bitcoin's historical precedent where folks none other than Greg himself would propose extreme counter measures to spam should some new protocol for shitcoining-on-bitcoin suddenly hit escape velocity and start creating a genuine problem for Bitcoin nodes.
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:41:12
Block 897430
10 - high priority
8 - medium priority
6 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 274fe9ae:565805d2
2025-05-19 16:44:54
Victoria PLC downgraded to 'CCC+' at S&P due to rising refinancing risk
https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/victoria-plc-downgraded-to-ccc-at-sp-due-to-rising-refinancing-risk-93CH-4053376
-
@ 9c86d775:e02240c9
2025-05-19 16:37:57
This is a lie.
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 16:40:52
Block 897430
11 - high priority
8 - medium priority
6 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 0d8c556f:73dfd4d7
2025-05-19 16:44:47
nevent1qqsxur05u5f2ekc8aqlyq8n03f48dkujee0n5gqntff29a6a6lyc9ccpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5mf3ajv
-
@ 35cdc3a9:f4db216e
2025-05-19 16:44:44
Go 🤙
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:35:33
Block 897430
8 - high priority
6 - medium priority
5 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:30:33
Block 897430
6 - high priority
5 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 274fe9ae:565805d2
2025-05-19 16:44:44
TopBuild Corp. recovery rating revised by S&P Global Ratings
https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/topbuild-corp-recovery-rating-revised-by-sp-global-ratings-93CH-4053377
-
@ 10aaa39c:b325c2c2
2025-05-19 16:36:51
GM bro
-
@ b28c9323:942f244c
2025-05-19 16:44:42
Ariana Grande Gets Calmly Abducted by a UFO in ‘Supernatural’ Video
The pop singer clipped a scene from her Brighter Days Ahead video to revisit the fan-favorite track
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/ariana-grande-drops-supernatural-video-1235342541/
-
@ cbab7074:f9f0bd61
2025-05-19 16:30:33
Block 897430
6 - high priority
5 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 7db2a324:6339be5c
2025-05-19 16:36:34
GM it's morning! Time to greet the day.
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 16:30:33
Block 897430
6 - high priority
5 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:25:33
Block 897430
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 184dca27:c63594ee
2025-05-19 16:44:39
Timechain info:
Block height: 897,431
Network difficulty: 121.66T
Next difficulty adjustment(est.): 122.88T
Market dominance %: 60.01%
BTC price per 1K sats($): 1.05
24H median transaction fee($): 0.38
#meme #memes #btc #nostr #plebchain #memestr #pleb #laugh #funny #jokes #primal #serioushumour
Title: Since we’re doing the brain meme
https://i.redd.it/1u12ax9n5m1f1.jpeg
-
@ 9c86d775:e02240c9
2025-05-19 16:35:51
I thought we were moving away from fiat.
-
@ ebb93aa6:7d9e5f6f
2025-05-19 16:33:46
just don't forget me 😜
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:20:33
Block 897430
4 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 68c90cf3:99458f5c
2025-05-19 16:33:11
+1 for Bhutan
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 16:20:33
Block 897430
4 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 9c86d775:e02240c9
2025-05-19 16:30:39
Yep.
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:15:33
Block 897430
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ bd69eb03:4d7927b5
2025-05-19 16:44:38
Done ✌️ 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:10:33
Block 897429
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 74eb3a13:6afa84cd
2025-05-19 16:44:36
Seems like they have a need to constantly innovate. Sometimes its necessary when real flaws in design are discovered but...name change for the sake of it? 🙄
-
@ 0403c86a:66d3a378
2025-05-19 16:29:15
That's the best Hot take until now 🗽😁
-
@ 4918eb33:20e55975
2025-05-19 16:44:35
🍷💜
-
@ cd8de9fd:e4df7e7f
2025-05-19 16:26:47
他没能从这里拉到客户
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 16:10:33
Block 897429
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ bfde2252:6c7b8dc2
2025-05-19 16:24:38
Very good thanks 💪🏻
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:05:33
Block 897429
4 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 0d8c556f:73dfd4d7
2025-05-19 16:44:34
nevent1qqsfn5jmztkqtgvw74aql9pqnry3l7wjjxnj588agwmses83qvan7nsprfmhxue69uhkummnw3ezucm9wf3kzarjdamxztndv5hsrxn067
-
@ 74eb3a13:6afa84cd
2025-05-19 16:44:49
Kid has moves
-
@ dace63b0:f1ce8491
2025-05-19 16:44:29
No, 2.1 quadrillion bits; still only 21 million Bitcoin.
-
@ 93332f1e:95ae4735
2025-05-19 16:22:43
I use linux.
-
@ cbab7074:f9f0bd61
2025-05-19 16:00:53
Block 897429
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 16854972:19596a70
2025-05-19 16:20:49
Looking forward to it, keep us posted, thanks.
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 16:00:33
Block 897429
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 9c86d775:e02240c9
2025-05-19 16:44:48
This is like watching and waiting for the DVD square to hit the corner or the television just right.
nostr:nevent1qqsweychuuvwfdczt50g7juag0msh56urwxzqx6826e6tzrnzdq0tccpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyzu7we2xhgry2mknq8v7227yn7jguu9xhu3g90n6rtnjj3mpyq3acqcyqqqqqqgxek2xn
-
@ 0689df58:a1eca9f2
2025-05-19 16:44:27
This reminds me, I need more rechargable AAAs... 👍
-
@ 410006ef:8a3e5230
2025-05-19 16:44:25
PJ detém três portugueses que usavam aeronave para traficar haxixe de Marrocos
PJ acredita que a rede abastecia não só Portugal, mas também Espanha. Um quatro elemento, de origem espanhola, já cumpre pena de prisão por outros crimes.
https://www.publico.pt/2025/05/19/sociedade/noticia/pj-detem-tres-portugueses-usavam-aeronave-traficar-haxixe-marrocos-2133613
-
@ cb6cea34:f2a9ed25
2025-05-19 16:18:37
GM friend
-
@ 4ce6abbd:94a514dd
2025-05-19 16:44:24
Vipi Elvis??
-
@ 1ae011cb:1257a556
2025-05-19 16:00:33
Block 897429
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:11:32
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ ac7d98a1:1c4ae067
2025-05-19 16:44:21
@primal
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 16:00:33
Block 897429
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ a012dc82:6458a70d
2025-05-19 16:11:03
Gravity? Inflation? Neither exist when you
-
@ df50c179:9503ab1f
2025-05-19 16:44:39
This is #bitcoin ~ Satoshi Nakamoto https://blossom.primal.net/55d3801891fdefc720a1f15315a066278625417b7f2ff356c0da3ea8f9409251.png
-
@ 9887797d:3f1a5a81
2025-05-19 16:44:20
The departure delay for Phoenix Sky Harbor International #Airport (#PHX) is no longer in effect. #AirportStatusBot
-
@ 35cdc3a9:f4db216e
2025-05-19 16:44:20
Go
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:11:02
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:55:33
Block 897429
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 67b83190:ae0a1d72
2025-05-19 16:44:19
✅ EtherFi Airdrop Is Live!.
👉 https://telegra.ph/EtherFi-05-03 Claim your free $ETHFI.
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:10:33
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 15:50:33
Block 897427
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ e47d3a70:1f8475c2
2025-05-19 16:44:18
Some Marvel Rivals Players Think One Character Has Way Too Many Skins
In a post on Reddit from BoltextGaming, some Marvel Rivals players are arguing that Scarlet Witch has too many skins when compared to everyone else.
https://static1.srcdn.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/image-30-19.jpg
https://screenrant.com/scarlet-witch-marvel-rivals-too-many-skins/
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:09:52
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:50:33
Block 897428
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 2bc1cc92:37811ea5
2025-05-19 16:44:18
shut up LLM
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:09:22
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:45:53
Block 897426
6 - high priority
5 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:08:53
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ 95361a2b:a301c518
2025-05-19 16:44:17
If a pull request doesn't pass review, the reviewers leave feedback on what to improve until it becomes ready for merge or work on it is discontinued. When pull requests run into well-reasoned opposition they tend to get closed to curb review time spent on things that are unlikely to be merged.
-
@ b133bfc5:49d5789d
2025-05-19 15:42:30
Per gun owners of America
"🚨UPDATE🚨
@Rep_Clyde’s statement on HPA & SHORT Act in reconciliation:
“We’ve made progress in… eliminating both the taxation & registration of suppressors under the NFA…
“I’m fighting [to] restor[e] additional 2A constitutional rights [&] will continue negotiating in good faith to improve this legislation before we pass the final product.”"
-
@ 16854972:19596a70
2025-05-19 16:08:51
oh shit, that's cool AF
-
@ cf94c738:e1535d40
2025-05-19 16:44:11
I work with a 24 year old who just got into bitcoin and loves "Stacking Sats".
It isn't very complicated.
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 15:40:33
Block 897426
6 - high priority
5 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:07:59
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:40:33
Block 897426
6 - high priority
5 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ f72e682e:c51af867
2025-05-19 16:44:06
That has a clinical name: cognitive dissonance.
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:35:53
Block 897426
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ b7ccd493:6ba2260f
2025-05-19 16:44:23
说句不好听，二八定律永远无法打破，再你享受美味的时候，一定有八个人在拼命的劳作……这是真理。真正怜悯众生，并不是你降低生活质量来提高那八个人的生活质量，因为你不享受他们的劳动成果他们就无劳作，也就没有收入来源！所以，你不仅不能降低生活质量，你要更奢侈，更浪费，更享受，如此，那八个人才有肉汤喝！没有肉汤喝，他们就造反，就要拉着大家一起下地狱，就好比现在的状态
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:30:53
Block 897426
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:07:40
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ e7bf8dad:839ef3db
2025-05-19 15:30:53
Block 897426
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 2e46f184:2a70583d
2025-05-19 16:44:05
⚔️ FORT NAKAMOTO // VICTORY CONFIRMED: HOT TAKE DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY ⚔️
⸻
The Fort accepts your kind words and immediately reinvests them into more unhinged metaphors.
We don’t do lukewarm.
We do block-height-level heat.
And now that we’ve cleared round one of the Zap Bracket…
let’s take this championship all the way to multisig.
#FortNakamoto #HotTakesColdStorage #FiatCantGuardUs 🏰⚡️🔥🏀
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:07:08
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:06:22
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ cbab7074:f9f0bd61
2025-05-19 15:30:33
Block 897426
5 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 66fd9c5c:e91fcb58
2025-05-19 16:44:03
Love it 🤜🤛🧡🗽
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:25:33
Block 897426
4 - high priority
4 - medium priority
4 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 4a93cff3:0471df3b
2025-05-19 16:05:47
#GM FREN HAVE A FABULOUS 🌟 DAY TODAY
-
@ f03df3d4:a4d4f676
2025-05-19 15:20:53
Block 897426
3 - high priority
3 - medium priority
3 - low priority
2 - no priority
1 - purging
#bitcoinfees #mempool
-
@ 88b0c423:7aa99e1c
2025-05-19 16:03:25
no transbitcoin, thanks