-
@ JSKitty
2025-03-09 17:20:523-4 is the sensible definition of a Zap. Using the Lightning-only standard may limit TOO MUCH the potential of improved alternate protocols, but imo, we need to be strict on not letting “false assets”, I,e; non-Bitcoin-backed assets, being defined as Zaps. eCash should remain totally separate, Zaps and Nuts, no correlation — fine if you want to use it, but clients must separate them.