-
@ GNΩME
2025-02-16 19:19:41
In the grand chessboard of geopolitics, Iran has long been a target for covert Western intervention.
The 2009 Iranian presidential election provided yet another example of a well-worn playbook—one designed to undermine sovereign nations under the guise of democracy. But this was far from a spontaneous people's movement. Instead, it bore all the hallmarks of a carefully orchestrated operation, leveraging the power of mass media, intelligence agencies, and globalist financial interests.
### 2009: A Manufactured Uprising
In June 2009, before Iran's election results were even finalized, opposition leader Mir-Houssein Mousavi [prematurely declared victory]( https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/5519567/Iran-elections-Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-and-Hossein-Mousavi-both-claim-victory.html). This calculated move set the stage for immediate allegations of fraud, ensuring that any outcome favoring incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would be delegitimized. The Western media wasted no time in amplifying the chaos, competing to push the most dramatic narratives. The **BBC** took the lead, [publishing outright fabrications]( https://web.archive.org/web/20090621065048/https://www.infowars.com/bbc-caught-in-mass-public-deception-with-iran-propaganda/) about mass uprisings—falsehoods they were later [forced to retract]( https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2009/06/what_really_happened.html).
Then came the Twitter storm. On June 13, a sudden [flood of **30,000 tweets**]( https://web.archive.org/web/20090619154321/https://chartingstocks.net/2009/06/proof-israeli-effort-to-destabilize-iran-via-twitter/), many in English, began pouring in from Iran. The accounts responsible? Newly created profiles, often using identical photos, a hallmark of an information warfare campaign. The **[Jerusalem Post]( https://web.archive.org/web/20090714235359/https://chartingstocks.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/jpost.jpg)** quickly picked up on the phenomenon, covering it within hours. This was no organic grassroots movement; it was a digital psy-op, mirroring past regime-change operations.
### The Blueprint: Iran 1953—The CIA’s Original Coup
This wasn’t Iran’s first encounter with a foreign-backed destabilization campaign. In 1953, Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister **Mohammed Mossadegh** made the fatal mistake of challenging Western oil interests. He sought to nationalize Iran’s petroleum industry, then controlled by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (later BP). The response was swift and brutal: the **CIA launched Operation Ajax**, an [insidious regime-change operation]( https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/041600iran-cia-index.html) that became the prototype for future coups.
The CIA’s strategy was as ruthless as it was effective:
* Staged bombings blamed on Mossadegh’s government
* Islamist agitation funded and nurtured to turn public sentiment
* Propaganda campaigns demonizing Mossadegh as a secular threat
* Bribery of officials and military leaders to ensure betrayal
The result? The overthrow of Mossadegh and the installation of the pro-Western **Shah**, whose reign saw brutal repression under the secret police **SAVAK**—trained by the CIA and Mossad. The template was established. From **Guatemala (1954) to Afghanistan (1980s) to Serbia (1990s)**, the same playbook was deployed. But with each coup, Western fingerprints became harder to conceal.
### A New Strategy: Economic Warfare and the NGO Takeover
With direct coups becoming too risky, a subtler method emerged: **economic strangulation**. Enter the **International Monetary Fund (IMF)**. The play was simple:
1. **A corrupt dictator takes out massive loans** for projects the country cannot afford.
2. **The country inevitably defaults**, giving the IMF the power to restructure its economy.
3. **Western corporations move in**, plundering national resources under the guise of “recovery.”
This scheme was exposed in **2001** when former World Bank chief economist **Joseph Stiglitz** [blew the whistle]( https://www.gregpalast.com/the-globalizer-who-came-in-from-the-cold/) on these manufactured debt traps. Further details emerged in 2004 with **John Perkins' “[Confessions of an Economic Hitman]( https://a.co/d/2oLfrTD)”**, which revealed how Western front companies and intelligence-backed corporations systematically dismantled economies for geopolitical gain.
But even this strategy had its limits. As exposure grew, the need for an even more sophisticated approach became apparent—one cloaked in the language of democracy and human rights.
### Color Revolutions: The Soros Connection
Enter the age of the **NGO-driven color revolutions**, where regime change is disguised as a people’s uprising. Organizations like the **Open Society Institute (George Soros), Freedom House, and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED)** became the new weapons of choice. These NGOs:
* **Fund and train opposition groups**
* **Coordinate mass protests during elections**
* **Provide media support** to delegitimize governments
The results? A series of destabilizations across the world:
**Ukraine (2004 - Orange Revolution)**
**Lebanon (2005 - Cedar Revolution)**
**Georgia (2003 - Rose Revolution)**
**Kyrgyzstan (2005 - Tulip Revolution)**
Each followed the same pattern—Western-backed NGOs funneled money and resources into opposition movements, ensuring their success. Unsurprisingly, these uprisings all bore the **fingerprints of Soros**, the billionaire financier with a long history of manipulating global politics to serve elite financial interests.
However, this strategy has started to backfire. Georgia witnessed a major [anti-Soros backlash]( https://halldor2.blogspot.com/2005/10/anti-soros-movement-in-georgia.html?m=1), and attempts to replicate these revolutions elsewhere—such as the failed Moldovan "[Grape Revolution]( https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/04/10/moldovas-twitter-revolution-is-not-a-myth/)"—have faltered as people wake up to the deception.
### Iran 2009: An Operation in Plain Sight
While no one denies that Ahmadinejad’s regime had its flaws, the coordinated media hysteria and backing of **Mir-Houssein "[Butcher of Beirut]( https://web.archive.org/web/20090626060145/http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/spytalk/2009/06/mousavi-celebrated-in-iranian.html)" Mousavi** raises serious questions. Why was the Western establishment so eager to install a leader with a brutal history? The answer lies in the same playbook used time and again:
1. **Foment unrest** through digital manipulation and street protests.
2. **Control the narrative** via Western media outlets.
3. **Install a leader** more compliant with Western economic and geopolitical interests.
Iran 2009 was not an isolated event. It was part of a much larger pattern—a centuries-old strategy of covert intervention, economic sabotage, and media manipulation to secure Western control over sovereign nations.
As history has shown, the real fight isn’t between the people and their governments—it’s between sovereign nations and the global power structures that seek to enslave them. And until people recognize the hidden hands behind these so-called revolutions, the cycle of deception will continue.