@ William K⚡Santiago🔑☢️
2025-03-25 20:17:22
CISA, or Cross-Input Signature Aggregation, is a technique in Bitcoin that allows multiple signatures from different inputs in a transaction to be combined into a single, aggregated signature. This is a big deal because Bitcoin transactions often involve multiple inputs (e.g., spending from different wallet outputs), each requiring its own signature. Normally, these signatures take up space individually, but CISA compresses them into one, making transactions more efficient.
This magic is possible thanks to the linearity property of Schnorr signatures, a type of digital signature introduced to Bitcoin with the Taproot upgrade. Unlike the older ECDSA signatures, Schnorr signatures have mathematical properties that allow multiple signatures to be added together into a single valid signature. Think of it like combining multiple handwritten signatures into one super-signature that still proves everyone signed off!
Fun Fact: CISA was considered for inclusion in Taproot but was left out to keep the upgrade simple and manageable. Adding CISA would’ve made Taproot more complex, so the developers hit pause on it—for now.
---
**CISA vs. Key Aggregation (MuSig, FROST): Don’t Get Confused!**
Before we go deeper, let’s clear up a common mix-up: CISA is not the same as protocols like MuSig or FROST. Here’s why:
* Signature Aggregation (CISA): Combines multiple signatures into one, each potentially tied to different public keys and messages (e.g., different transaction inputs).
* Key Aggregation (MuSig, FROST): Combines multiple public keys into a single aggregated public key, then generates one signature for that key.
**Key Differences:**
1. What’s Aggregated?
* CISA: Aggregates signatures.
* Key Aggregation: Aggregates public keys.
2. What the Verifier Needs
* CISA: The verifier needs all individual public keys and their corresponding messages to check the aggregated signature.
* Key Aggregation: The verifier only needs the single aggregated public key and one message.
3. When It Happens
* CISA: Used during transaction signing, when inputs are being combined into a transaction.
* MuSig: Used during address creation, setting up a multi-signature (multisig) address that multiple parties control.
So, CISA is about shrinking signature data in a transaction, while MuSig/FROST are about simplifying multisig setups. Different tools, different jobs!
---
**Two Flavors of CISA: Half-Agg and Full-Agg**
CISA comes in two modes:
* Full Aggregation (Full-Agg): Interactive, meaning signers need to collaborate during the signing process. (We’ll skip the details here since the query focuses on Half-Agg.)
* Half Aggregation (Half-Agg): Non-interactive, meaning signers can work independently, and someone else can combine the signatures later.
Since the query includes “CISA Part 2: Half Signature Aggregation,” let’s zoom in on Half-Agg.
---
**Half Signature Aggregation (Half-Agg) Explained**
**How It Works**
Half-Agg is a non-interactive way to aggregate Schnorr signatures. Here’s the process:
1. Independent Signing: Each signer creates their own Schnorr signature for their input, without needing to talk to the other signers.
2. Aggregation Step: An aggregator (could be anyone, like a wallet or node) takes all these signatures and combines them into one aggregated signature.
A Schnorr signature has two parts:
* R: A random point (32 bytes).
* s: A scalar value (32 bytes).
In Half-Agg:
* The R values from each signature are kept separate (one per input).
* The s values from all signatures are combined into a single s value.
**Why It Saves Space (~50%)**
Let’s break down the size savings with some math:
Before Aggregation:
* Each Schnorr signature = 64 bytes (32 for R + 32 for s).
* For n inputs: n × 64 bytes.
After Half-Agg:
* Keep n R values (32 bytes each) = 32 × n bytes.
* Combine all s values into one = 32 bytes.
* Total size: 32 × n + 32 bytes.
Comparison:
* Original: 64n bytes.
* Half-Agg: 32n + 32 bytes.
* For large n, the “+32” becomes small compared to 32n, so it’s roughly 32n, which is half of 64n. Hence, ~50% savings!
**Real-World Impact:**
Based on recent Bitcoin usage, Half-Agg could save:
* ~19.3% in space (reducing transaction size).
* ~6.9% in fees (since fees depend on transaction size). This assumes no major changes in how people use Bitcoin post-CISA.
---
**Applications of Half-Agg**
Half-Agg isn’t just a cool idea—it has practical uses:
1. Transaction-wide Aggregation
* Combine all signatures within a single transaction.
* Result: Smaller transactions, lower fees.
2. Block-wide Aggregation
* Combine signatures across all transactions in a Bitcoin block.
* Result: Even bigger space savings at the blockchain level.
3. Off-chain Protocols / P2P
* Use Half-Agg in systems like Lightning Network gossip messages.
* Benefit: Efficiency without needing miners or a Bitcoin soft fork.
---
**Challenges with Half-Agg**
While Half-Agg sounds awesome, it’s not without hurdles, especially at the block level:
1. Breaking Adaptor Signatures
* Adaptor signatures are special signatures used in protocols like Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs) or atomic swaps. They tie a signature to revealing a secret, ensuring fair exchanges.
* Aggregating signatures across a block might mess up these protocols, as the individual signatures get blended together, potentially losing the properties adaptor signatures rely on.
2. Impact on Reorg Recovery
* In Bitcoin, a reorganization (reorg) happens when the blockchain switches to a different chain of blocks. Transactions from the old chain need to be rebroadcast or reprocessed.
* If signatures are aggregated at the block level, it could complicate extracting individual transactions and their signatures during a reorg, slowing down recovery.
These challenges mean Half-Agg needs careful design, especially for block-wide use.
---
**Wrapping Up**
CISA is a clever way to make Bitcoin transactions more efficient by aggregating multiple Schnorr signatures into one, thanks to their linearity property. Half-Agg, the non-interactive mode, lets signers work independently, cutting signature size by about 50% (to 32n + 32 bytes from 64n bytes). It could save ~19.3% in space and ~6.9% in fees, with uses ranging from single transactions to entire blocks or off-chain systems like Lightning.
But watch out—block-wide Half-Agg could trip up adaptor signatures and reorg recovery, so it’s not a slam dunk yet. Still, it’s a promising tool for a leaner, cheaper Bitcoin future!