-
@ LiโฟฮสLiรธฮท ๐ดaยณ
2025-06-05 10:28:15
๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ช๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐น๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ต๐บ๐: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐
แถ สณแตแต แตแตหกโฑแตโฑแถแตหก แตโฑหขแตแตแตแตโฑโฟแตแตแตโฟแต แตแต แตแตแถสฐโฟโฑแถแตหก แถ แตแตโฑหขสฐโฑหขแต
https://image.nostr.build/ac43ac762d5cd4237ce3fd7d5a0190bf4dbb24d7c14a38c40af78f5c297e8b07.jpg
Democratic fatigue is palpable. Systemic corruption, constant polarization, and leaders who seem to have come out of a dystopian casting call have eroded confidence in politics as a space for representation.
In this emotional and ethical vacuum, the figure of the algorithm appears: efficient, impartial, available 24/7, and supposedly free of passions.
The idea is seductive. What if artificial intelligence made better decisions than a Congress full of egos and scandals? What if the objectivity of data could replace the subjectivity of opinion?
Thus begins the fantasy of algorithmic government.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐๐๐ก๐ง๐จ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ
But voting for algorithms is not an innocent step. It is the gateway to ultimate technocracy: the government of those who know best, or worse, of those who calculate best.
It is not just about efficiency. It is about replacing political judgmentโhuman, contradictory, imperfectโwith technical criteria that represent formulas rather than interests.
And most seriously, these algorithms are not neutral. They carry with them the biases of their programmers, the interests of those who finance them, and the limitations of the environment in which they operate. But they are sold as objective truth. And many buy into it.
๐๐ข๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ
All this takes place in a virtual ecosystem designed for illusion.
Networks simulate consensus, dashboards simulate transparency, metrics simulate legitimacy. We live immersed in a parallel reality that privileges appearance over substance.
In this context, why not vote for an algorithm? If we already live in simulation, we might as well choose the best simulator.
๐๐๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐
Democracy dies, not with a coup, but with a click. Not when it is taken away from us, but when we choose not to exercise it.
When choosing becomes a hassle, and delegating to a machine seems sensible. When we confuse governance with automation.
Voting for algorithms will be the final nail in the coffin of democracy.
Not because algorithms are evil, but because we will be too tired of human corruption to be citizens and will delude ourselves into believing that algorithms will be the solution.
#tags: LiberLion Article; Democracy ; Technocracy