-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6f00/d6f00cef91958dc9897bd887d1f0f37ee1f33de6" alt=""
@ Corey San Diego
2025-02-16 07:48:35
At my meet up (the SD Bitcoiners Cete) on Thursday, I presented trends on the Bisq protocol. One of its features is that anyone can export the trade history and analyze it.
Bisq is a private, peer-tp-peer way to buy and sell bitcoin. All data are based on the BTC-USD market.
Trade number decreased in 2024
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fdc0/3fdc0e6f7982b2006da4b8bd784e8a365970a947" alt=""
But USD volume increased ($/year)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d13c/7d13c2ee2dd6f250fe2e845a5d2deeb0c5584ce4" alt=""
(same graph but $/day by year)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3610/f3610319e55e70f0ca4f3e61573e3b5f090fb53a" alt=""
Which means more higher value per trade
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04dc8/04dc8a57ffc80b44152c5a7ab13b1e57059c1e30" alt=""
Interestingly, trade counts and price volatility lead to interesting BTC volume per year. The peaks are nearly identical (330 BTC)!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d76b/2d76be9fe5ee058fcbd72551aefcd2410129e71e" alt=""
Not so surprising when you compare BTC volume traded to the average BTC price that year, local price valleys mean local peaks in BTC traded (and vice versa).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fd42/7fd42677c7df1ff9461b2131fa5f1d0c3917ea5c" alt=""
I separate fiat payment methods into three groups.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686b3/686b3b191014c8aa323fe4fbe0744490248c1aef" alt=""
All USD payment methods used in 2024 by average value (y-axis) and number of trades (bubble size)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0ce3/c0ce389d4c29857d64c153659514f78cab2f2273" alt=""
This is the same graph as above excluding Zelle and Strike, since they throw off the relative circle size (face-to-face only had 1 trade in 2024).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f536d/f536d3ac0964a8b95ae044cd3022d8dacd4ead6a" alt=""
Two fiat methods had >1000 trades in 2024. Strike came on the scene hot in 2021 and ate some of the Zelle volume but that may have stabilized.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbb9a/dbb9a407c6a6c428ce555e62bd924461f3172900" alt=""
Six fiat methods had 200-1000 trades in 2024. Amazon Gift Card dwindling, Cash By Mail still top of this group, and Revolut surging (wtf is Revolut?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a488c/a488ca44316c1dd06e67b54656e0a1ae09cba9e0" alt=""
Same group, all years
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd53e/cd53e2bc940688872c9977fe7c888cfd6b0c3d99" alt=""
Last group is <200 trades in 2024. Basically unused, except for Wire Transfer increasing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9b8c/b9b8cfd465efa199ab49f181fd07752772eb6302" alt=""
Same group, all years
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e467/3e46712ae190c5784af2e057fd22ad6e68257a06" alt=""
What's the average trade size by fiat method? There are different reasons for this, largely driven by fiat fees and bank limits. Amazon Gift Card is an interesting option for smaller payments (note: you can't just send any gift card, there is a very specific process, see the Bisq [wiki]( https://bisq.wiki/Amazon_eGift_card))
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0486/b0486d6d936eed4a6f510b97b4e2728601a28fc7" alt=""
There no KYC premium, but there is a small Surveillance Discount
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf1b2/cf1b288162114d327b941cc08b107b9800183b9f" alt=""
If you open Bisq for the first time, you'll likely see spreads 3-5% or larger. These offers persist because no one wants them. So people think that Bisq is "too expensive." But let's dig into the actual trades...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29c65/29c657bedddc3a653d1617ef81b1c26ebe9a80b5" alt=""
Comparing the daily trade volume to daily market rate (I used coingecko), and creating a monthly weighted average, the true surveillance discount emerges. It's not 3-5% as you might see in the order book at any given time. In fact, it was cheaper to trade on Bisq than exchanges in November and December! (Note: this does not take into account the 4 on-chain transactions required for a trade or price spread/fees used by exchanges)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51276/5127657c27df43e50fc445ca7fbc56e9b8984250" alt=""
In 2024, Strike had the worst surveillance discount and Cash By Mail had the best. This isn't surprising because receiving cash is convenient and low risk for a seller so they're willing to accept a lower price. Zelle (the most common USD payment method) had the second best surveillance discount.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b52/c2b52c091c30a752174c51e1ded293fba6898cd4" alt=""
Now let's compare the surveillance discount by week in 2024 for select payment methods.
Strike was consistently worse than Zelle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67af3/67af398ef37c9fc773016dfbc004a64c8e6755e7" alt=""
Revolut was sometimes way worse than Zelle but sometimes a little better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/937c8/937c8e0609a7ccdc52b808fe4ff43c787ae1866e" alt=""
The two most private payment methods are cash and money order. They're pretty competitive regarding surveillance discount.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdf27/bdf27c309c28834a7686c7c2e2f557018ba22d29" alt=""
Take aways
* Be a maker and get a better price (fees are better too)
* Zelle is better for speed + convenience
* Amazon gift cards are good for speed + privacy (sorta)
* Cash or money order are better for privacy + volume