-
@ Jack K
2025-03-05 11:45:03
I hear you. I’m hesitant for a few reasons, one being the battle of releasing this under my name; I don’t want the fame or the attention, but no one will be able to defend it. Yet clearly not one else has gotten here and I feel the stagnation growing.
Secondly before I can get to any math such as redefining temperature, Boltzmann and energy of bitcoin you must be able to use bitcoin as both a thought experiment and a system to observe a “new early universe (in cyberspace)”. Without fundamentally observing the natural evolution of Bitcoin I can’t convince anyone to change their perspective. Bitcoin shows us the way.
How am I supposed to tell people in academia that their entire perspective about a few fundamental things is wrong and Bitcoin is the way to correct it? People think it’s just money lol, and I’m saying it fixes physics. I sound crazy.
I have 2 separate bodies of work, one being 60+ pages long and the other 15. I’ve been thinking about how to join them and condense everything down to be digestible. I have a few ideas.
Do you have any recommendations as to how I could get a physicists to think about the universe through bitcoin so we can fix the perspective on temperature? This is the fundamental breakdown when it comes to quantum mechanics and universal genesis because of “quantum gravity” at what they believe is Planck temperature. But that perspective is wrong, there are no paradoxes. We have everything right; we just have the wrong perspective and have been missing the bitcoin lens in order to see that.