-
@ menherahair :redeyeorb:
2025-02-26 11:18:57
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq0l8k2vx4f6mxjwf9ds2tufyl4xr9q7sj535pf3wpthyhl2rs9pdqttaq5l nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqdphugmh2e88uc7ntlfsjjxeqstv8qlz4c30zuqe0zwwwqx2xg7mqta6ak9 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqrvp3ct23v2eqekvucpa4a2378f2ekqcrra238hutlz2ths93x9csqldxfh nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqkwugrw5qdm7qzgw4zduc6g8mj3z0wztn54av9vmth9uks4zdugeqam3w5m okay what you said is bullshit and I knew it's bullshit because it's how I've been doing it for years, stroke selection literally just does selection-to-path and stroke path ignoring selection, it should be the same
but turns out it still isn't :marimaricry:
>"Stroke a selection" generates a path on-the-fly with parameters that are different from the the ones used in the "Select--to-path" to this path is not as smooth.
>In the image below, the red is "stroke selection" (selection obtained by "Alpha to selection") and the blue is "select to path, stroke path", and the red is visibly more wiggly.
http://gimpchat.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=17762#p243746
and if you just try both with defaults and compare (pic2) they're also different for some reason, so I've still been doing it wrong for 18 years. I can't believe forum signature tutorials taught me wrong
https://eientei.org/media/94/ea/3d/94ea3d4a888a1a9e9cf0adb52c2e55b4a6f4b28ed69424b2f1dd14a1dab73fdc.png?name=image.png
https://eientei.org/media/14/0e/fa/140efa717ca228dd066b7af8fcebf852a9409fc846235a9dae627bfd246df307.png?name=image.png