-
![](/static/nostr-icon-purple-64x64.png)
@ 193173fb:dba04c66
2025-02-13 11:49:18
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqh9tjfn72vj3ejn54rmg0ammer4p65td334pkqxhsegshwyp3ustq688kev nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqh4chstmmpfrmtgg2lyvngc74z95n3t2mphfvxnytqa3htz76cnvqx3kmz0 Hi! I think i386 is a very different place than usrmerge. (I agree usrmerge was done "not good" in Debian, but this is besides the point.) What we're seeing now with i386 is basically the same what we saw with delaying usrmerge: upstreams stop supporting it, and not enough people downstream continue working on it. And "working" is not just fixing individual bugs; all relevant teams must have people working on the architecture.