-
@ RedTailHawk
2025-05-19 19:29:31
OK. After I address this one, please tell me where my presentation is wrong if you have other items as you suggest.
Yes. 6-7 thousand years.
Well, think about it. If what I'm saying is right, then there would be very little evidence of civilization prior to about 6000 years ago, right?
That happens to be the case. The aCaDeMIc "consensus" is that there were no civilizations prior to the fertile crescent in Mesopotamia, right?
So that would explain why there is very little evidence of anything beyond the most recent flood, for starters. Notice I said "very little evidence" whereas you said "apparently no archaeological evidence".
What about the Piri Reis map showing unglaciated coastlines of Antarctica?
What about the map projection method used suggestive of highly advanced mathematics on the part of whoever created the map which is apparently at least as old as...4000 BC which would be...6000 years ago...and according to the research I presented, we are currently experiencing a geomagnetic excursion as of ~1947 when the Air Force noticed that the magnetic north pole had made a dramatic shift in position relative to the previous 114 years of relative stability on Boothia Peninsula.
What about Tiahuanaco?
What about Gobekli Tepe?
What about the erosion on the pyramids suggesting they spent a significant amount of time underwater experiencing parabolic wave erosion patterns?
What about the aurora borealis we've had recently that were visible at record southerly latitudes in the northern hemisphere and record northerly latitudes in the southern hemisphere?
We have the ongoing south Atlantic anomaly.
We have seen increasing volatility in terms of major weather events which would make sense given that we know the strength of the magnetosphere has is decreasing at an accelerating pace.
Earth's core recently shifted and began spinning in the opposite direction.
There's plenty of evidence for this. The issue is that lots of that evidence COULD be explained in other ways and many people are simply not aware of the evidence. It's there though.
It explains why billionaires are building bunkers in New Zealand.
It explains why they put together the international seed back in Svalbard. They know that stuff in the Arctic circle is likely to wind up in a temperate zone after the next pole flip and temperate zones are where civilization will redevelop after the next flood.