-
@ Nazo
2025-02-24 01:59:24
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqzdp33shl69xr0uq3x8n5gsjykq9upycwh6nqm02c3f6x0frrn0dqftargs nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqhrm5sxeqy8zzg4ha589zdtptef64qqtxdrjl0yauzc6n3hptf40qx28scv Right. I make this differentiation because A. I want to be clear that no matter how they might advertise this or that method is more accurate, it will always fail due to the underlying issue and B. some people think the tech just isn't fully developed, but its underlying mechanism can NEVER improve without changing to something else entirely.
(Well, as a side note, many do actually make an effort to train in more accuracy, just, the fundamental issue always comes back to bite them. They legit are trying, it just can't work.)