-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4b43/a4b43223d5113d182ae6ff657d73ffa38bdddc55" alt=""
@ SLCW
2025-02-25 02:29:12
That's all allegations, and not supporting evidence. I'm well aware of what Diego Garcia is. How do you know that's where the wreckage was taken "for processing"? What is this iPhone image, and what does it prove? Has that photo been examined by the authorities? What were their conclusions as to that photo? If a plane went down in the spot off the coast of Australia, Réunion Island and/or other nearby spots on the eastern coast of Africa is is exactly where the debris would be. This has been established by both the authorities and independent oceanographers based on current data, and weather data.
Finally, the fact that 9/10 planes are found within a few hours of crashing is irrelevant. The circumstances of this plane crashing, and the actions of the pilot or whoever in disabling the tracking mechanisms and radio transceivers means this isn't an average plane crash. If 9/10 are discovered in a few hours, that means 1 is not. This is that 1 plane. And a statistics showing how often a plane isn't discovered within a few hours isn't evidence of anything. It's a statistical comparator that doesn't tell you anything about this specific plane.
If the story is that some nefarious group downed the place for some unknown, nefarious purpose, and spirited the wreckage away to Diego Garcia, I don't buy it. I've seen no evidence that supports that idea, and it's preposterous on its fact. It's the sort of claim that demands strong, compelling evidence both to support it, and to explain the contrary evidence that doesn't support it. That's a heavy lift. And I don't think the evidence is even close to meeting the bar.