-
@ Sasker
2025-04-22 12:00:12
I love that there are many that dive into all the intricacies and plumbing like nostr:nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpzpmhxue69uhh2uewwf38ytnzd9hsz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9ws72v7p4 and nostr:nprofile1qqsxc56ajk5xtxerf4dqspgrfa0s5elrcr80lnz9nasldq87j3zzf0cp2amhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0dec82c33vsekvdrd89jxwantv348sm3jxec8z7nn0phrvmrsvehrwwrn0pmkcmrc096rsmtsxum8zvrp89a8j7t2d3ehw6rjx3u8vqg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsdllmlq and you. On the other side there is something to say for the idea 💡 that the whole technological innovation is that you remove all the complexity of fiat style wealth preservation. You simply stack and worry about the value you produce with your time and energy. Not staring at the intricacies of the coins you saved up.
As I said, I’m also very grateful that
some people are doing this work as researchers. So we can keep our course steady. It always interests me too and I hope you inspire the next Lyn, but generally I am far more valuable elsewhere. Which is probably and hopefully true for most people.