-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 10:34:08Dilling est une marque danoise qui crée des vêtements en laine, soie et coton biologique pour toute la famille.
Matières naturelles utilisées dans les produits
- Coton (biologique)
- Laine (mérinos, alpaga)
- Latex naturel (OEKO-TEX ®)
- Soie
⚠️ Attention, certains produits de cette marque (notamment les Vêtements - chaussettes, vestes, strings, shorts) contiennent des matières non naturelles, dont :
- Elasthanne
- Polyamide, nylon (nylon recyclé)
- Polyester (recyclé)
Catégories de produits proposés
-
Vêtements : homme, femme, enfant, bébé, sous-vêtements, t-shirts, débardeurs, robes, vestes, pantalons, shorts, pulls, gilets, bodies, combinaisons, culottes, slips, boxers...
👉 Voir les produits naturels de cette marque
Autres informations
- Ecolabel Nordic Swan (teintures)
- Fabriqué en Lituanie (coupe et couture)
- Fabriqué au Danemark (teintures)
- Fabriqué en Europe
👉 En savoir plus sur le site de la marque
Cet article est publié sur origine-nature.com 🌐 See this article in English
📝 Vous pouvez contribuer à cette fiche en suggérant une modification en commentaire.
🗣️ Vous utilisez ce produit ? Partagez votre avis en commentaire.
⚡ Heureu-x-se de trouver cette information ? Soutenez le projet en faisant un don, pour remercier les contribut-eur-ice-s.
-
@ 81650982:299380fa
2025-04-30 11:16:42
Let us delve into Monero (XMR). Among the proponents of various altcoins, Monero arguably commands one of the most dedicated followings, perhaps second only to Ethereum. Unlike many altcoins where even investors often harbor speculative, short-term intentions, the genuine belief within the Monero community suggests an inherent appeal to the chain itself.
The primary advantage touted by Monero (and similar so-called "privacy coins") is its robust privacy protection features. The demand for anonymous payment systems, tracing its lineage back to David Chaum, predates even the inception of Bitcoin. Monero's most heavily promoted strength, relative to Bitcoin, is that its privacy features are enabled by default.
This relates to the concept of the "anonymity set." To guarantee anonymity, a user must blend into a crowd of ordinary users. The larger the group one hides within, the more difficult it becomes for an external observer to identify any specific individual. From the perspective of Monero advocates, Bitcoin's default transaction model is overly transparent, clearly revealing the flow of funds between addresses. While repeated mixing can enhance anonymity in Bitcoin, the fact that users must actively undertake such measures presents a significant hurdle. More critically, proponents argue, the very group engaging in such deliberate obfuscation is precisely the group one doesn't want to be associated with for effective anonymity. Hiding requires blending with the ordinary, not merely mixing with others who are also actively trying to hide — the latter, they contend, is akin to criminals mixing only with other criminals.
This is a valid point. For instance, there's a substantial difference between a messenger app offering end-to-end encryption for all communications by default, versus one requiring users to explicitly create a "secret chat" for encryption. While I personally believe that increased self-custody of Bitcoin in personal wallets, acquisition through direct peer-to-peer payments rather than exchange purchases, and the widespread adoption of the Lightning Network would make tracing significantly harder even without explicit mixing efforts, let us concede, for the sake of argument, that Bitcoin's base-layer anonymity might not drastically improve even in such a future scenario.
Nevertheless, Monero's long-term prospects appear considerably constrained when focusing purely on technical limitations, setting aside economic factors or incentive models for now. While discussions on economics can often be countered with "That's just your speculation," technical constraints present more objective facts and leave less room for dispute.
Monero's most fundamental problem is its lack of scalability. To briefly explain how Monero obfuscates the sender: it includes other addresses alongside the true sender's address in the 'from' field and attaches what appears to be valid signatures for all of them. With a default setting of 10 decoys (plus the real spender, making a ring size of 11), the signature size naturally becomes substantially larger than Bitcoin's. Since an observer cannot determine which of the 11 is the true sender, and these decoys are arbitrary outputs selected from the blockchain belonging to other users, anonymity is indeed enhanced. While the sender cannot generate individually valid signatures for the decoy outputs (as they don't own the private keys), the use of a ring signature mathematically proves that one member of the ring authorized the transaction, allowing it to pass network validation.
The critical issue is that this results in transaction sizes several times larger than Bitcoin's. Bitcoin already faces criticism for being relatively expensive and slow. Monero's structure imposes a burden that is multiples greater. One might question the relationship between transaction data size and transaction fees/speed. However, the perceived slowness of blockchains isn't typically due to inefficient code, but rather the strict limitations imposed on block size (or equivalent throughput constraints) to maintain decentralization. Therefore, larger transaction sizes directly translate into throughput limitations and upward pressure on fees. If someone claims Monero fees are currently lower than Bitcoin's, that is merely a consequence of its significantly lower usage. Should Monero's transaction volume reach even a fraction of Bitcoin's, its current architecture would struggle severely under the load.
To address this, Monero implemented a dynamic block size limit instead of a hardcoded one. However, this is not a comprehensive solution. If the block size increases proportionally with usage, a future where Monero achieves widespread adoption as currency — implying usage potentially hundreds, thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of times greater than today — would render the blockchain size extremely difficult to manage for ordinary node operators. Global internet traffic might be consumed by Monero transactions, or at the very least, the bandwidth and storage costs could exceed what individuals can reasonably bear.
Blockchains, by their nature, must maintain a size manageable enough for individuals to run full nodes, necessitating strict block size limits (or equivalent constraints in blockless designs). This fundamental requirement is the root cause of limited transaction speed and rising fees. Consequently, the standard approach to blockchain scaling involves Layer 2 solutions like the Lightning Network. The problem is, implementing such solutions on Monero is extremely challenging.
Layer 2 solutions, while varying in specific implementation details across different blockchains, generally rely heavily on the transparency of on-chain transactions. They typically involve sophisticated smart contracts built upon the ability to publicly verify on-chain states and events. Monero's inherent opacity, hiding crucial details of on-chain transactions, makes it exceptionally difficult for two mutually untrusting parties to reach the necessary consensus and cryptographic agreements (like establishing payment channels with verifiable state transitions and dispute mechanisms) that underpin such Layer 2 systems. The fact that Monero, despite existing for several years, still lacks a functional, widely adopted Layer 2 implementation suggests that this remains an unsolved and technically formidable challenge. While theoretical proposals exist, their real-world feasibility remains uncertain and would likely require significant breakthroughs in cryptographic protocol design.
Furthermore, Monero faces another severe scaling challenge related to its core privacy mechanism. As mentioned, decoy outputs are used to obscure the true sender. An astute observer might wonder: If a third party cannot distinguish the real spender, could the real spender potentially double-spend their funds later? Or could someone's funds become unusable simply because they were chosen as a decoy in another transaction? Naturally, Monero's developers anticipated this. The solution employed involves key images.
When an output is genuinely spent within a ring signature, a unique cryptographic identifier called a "key image" is derived from the real output and the spender's private key. This derivation is one-way (the key image cannot be used to reveal the original output or key). This key image is recorded on the blockchain. When validating a new transaction, the network checks if the submitted key image has already appeared in the history. If it exists, the transaction is rejected as a double-spend attempt. The crucial implication is that this set of used key images can never be pruned. Deleting historical key images would directly enable double-spending.
Therefore, Monero's state size — the data that full nodes must retain and check against — grows linearly and perpetually with the total number of transactions ever processed on the network.
Summary In summary, Monero faces critical technical hurdles:
Significantly Larger Transaction Sizes: The use of ring signatures for anonymity results in transaction data sizes several times larger than typical cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
Inherent Scalability Limitations: The large transaction size, combined with the necessity of strict block throughput limits to preserve decentralization, creates severe scalability bottlenecks regarding transaction speed and cost under significant load. Dynamic block sizes, while helpful in the short term, do not constitute a viable long-term solution for broad decentralization.
Layer 2 Implementation Difficulty: Monero's fundamental opacity makes implementing established Layer 2 scaling solutions (like payment channels) extremely difficult with current approaches. The absence of a widely adopted solution to date indicates that this remains a major unresolved challenge.
Unprunable, Linearly Growing State: The key image mechanism required to prevent double-spending mandates the perpetual storage of data proportional to the entire transaction history, unlike Bitcoin where nodes can prune historical blocks and primarily need to maintain the current UTXO set (whose size depends on usage patterns, not total history).
These technical constraints raise legitimate concerns about Monero's ability to scale effectively and achieve widespread adoption in the long term. While ongoing research may alleviate some of these issues, at present they represent formidable challenges that any privacy-focused cryptocurrency must contend with.
-
@ 3589b793:ad53847e
2025-04-30 10:53:29
※本記事は別サービスで2022年5月22日に公開した記事の移植です。
Happy 🍕 Day's Present
まだ邦訳版が出版されていませんがこれまでのシリーズと同じくGitHubにソースコードが公開されています。なんと、現在のライセンスでは個人使用限定なら翻訳や製本が可能です。Macで、翻訳にはPDFをインプットにできるDeepLを用いた環境で、インスタントに製本してKindleなどで読めるようにする方法をまとめました。
手順の概要
- Ruby環境を用意する
- PDF作成ツールをセットアップする
- GitHubのリポジトリを自分のPCにクローンする
- asciidocをPDFに変換する
- DeepLを節約するためにPDFを結合する
- DeepLで翻訳ファイルを作る
- 一冊に製本する
この手法の強み・弱み
翻訳だけならPDFを挟まなくてもGithubなどでプレビューできるコンパイル後のドキュメントの文章をコピーしてDeepLのWebツールにペーストすればよいですが、原著のペーパーブックで438ページある大容量です。熟練のコピペ職人でも年貢を納めて後進（機械やソフトウェア）に道を譲る刻ではないでしょうか？ただし、Pros/Consがあります。
Pros
- 一冊の本になるので毎度のコピペ作業がいらない
- Pizzaを食べながらタブレットやKindleで読める
- 図や表が欠落しない（プロトコルの手順を追った解説が多いため最大の動機でした）
- 2022/6/16追記: DeepLの拡張機能がアップデートされウェブページの丸ごと翻訳が可能になりました。よってウェブ上のgithubの図表付きページをそのまま翻訳できます。
Cons
- Money is power（大容量のためDeepLの有料契約が必要）
- ページを跨いだ文章が統合されずに不自然な翻訳になる（仕様です）
- ~~翻訳できない章が一つある（解決方法がないか調査中です。DeepLさんもっとエラーメッセージ出してくれ。Help me）~~ DeepLサポートに投げたら翻訳できるようになりました。
詳細ステップ
0.Ruby環境を用意する
asciidoctorも新しく入れるなら最新のビルドで良いでしょう。
1.PDF作成ツールをセットアップする
$ gem install asciidoctor asciidoctor-pdf $ brew install gs2.GitHubのリポジトリを自分のPCにクローンする
どこかの作業ディレクトリで以下を実行する
$ git clone git@github.com:lnbook/lnbook.git $ cd lnbook3.asciidocをPDFに変換する
ワイルドカードを用いて本文を根こそぎPDF化します。
$ asciidoctor-pdf 0*.asciidoc 1*.asciidocいろいろ解析の警告が出ますが、ソースのasciidocを弄んでいくなりawsomeライブラリを導入すれば解消できるはずです。しかし如何せん量が多いので心が折れます。いったん無視して"Done is better than perfect"精神で最後までやり切りましょう。そのままGO！
また、お好みに合わせて、htmlで用意されている装丁用の部品も準備しましょう。私は表紙のcover.htmlをピックしました。ソースがhtmlなのでasciidoctorを通さず普通にPDFへ変換します。https://qiita.com/chenglin/items/9c4ed0dd626234b71a2c
4.DeepLを節約するためにPDFを結合する
DeepLでは課金プラン毎に翻訳可能なファイル数が設定されている上に、一本あたりの最大ファイルサイズが10MBです。また、翻訳エラーになる章が含まれていると丸ごとコケます。そのためPDCAサイクルを回し、最適なファイル数を手探りで見つけます。以下が今回導出した解となります。
$ gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=output_1.pdf 01_introduction.pdf 02_getting_started.pdf 03_how_ln_works.pdf 04_node_client.pdf 05_node_operations.pdf$gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=output_2_1.pdf 06_lightning_architecture.pdf 07_payment_channels.pdf 08_routing_htlcs.pdf$gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=output_2_2.pdf 09_channel_operation.pdf 10_onion_routing.asciidoc$ gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=output_3.pdf 11_gossip_channel_graph.pdf 12_path_finding.pdf 13_wire_protocol.pdf 14_encrypted_transport.pdf 15_payment_requests.pdf 16_security_privacy_ln.pdf 17_conclusion.pdf5. DeepLで翻訳ファイルを作る
PDFファイルを真心を込めた手作業で一つ一つDeepLにアップロードしていき翻訳ファイルを作ります。ファイル名はデフォルトの
[originalName]（日本語）.pdfのままにしています。6. 一冊に製本する
表紙 + 本文で作成する例です。
$ gs -q -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=mastering_ln_jp.pdf cover.pdf "output_1 (日本語).pdf" "output_2_1 (日本語).pdf" "output_2_2 (日本語).pdf" "output_3 (日本語).pdf"コングラチュレーションズ🎉
あなたは『Mastering the Lightning Network』の日本語版を手に入れた！個人使用に限り、あとは煮るなり焼くなりEPUBなりkindleへ送信するなり好き放題だ。
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:29:25
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:28:38
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 10:34:58
Dilling is a Danish brand that creates wool, silk, and organic cotton clothing for the whole family.
Natural materials used in products
- Cotton (organic)
- Natural latex (OEKO-TEX ®)
- Silk
- Wool (merino, alpaca)
⚠️ Warning: some products from this brand (especially Clothes – socks, jackets, thongs, shorts) contain non-natural materials, including:
- Elastane, spandex, lycra
- Polyamide, nylon (recycled nylon)
- Polyester (recycled)
Categories of products offered
-
Clothing: men, women, children, babies, underwear, t-shirts, tank tops, dresses, jackets, trousers, shorts, sweaters, cardigans, bodysuits, jumpsuits, panties, briefs, boxers...
👉 See natural products from this brand
Other information
- Nordic Swan ecolabel (dye)
- Made in Lithuania (cutting and sewing)
- Made in Denmark (dye)
- Made in Europe
👉 Learn more on the brand's website
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français
📝 You can contribute to this entry by suggesting edits in comments.
🗣️ Do you use this product? Share your opinion in the comments.
⚡ Happy to have found this information? Support the project by making a donation to thank the contributors.
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:27:09
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:26:33
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:24:29
-
@ d08c9312:73efcc9f
2025-04-30 09:59:52
Resolvr CEO, Aaron Daniel, summarizes his keynote speech from the Bitcoin Insurance Summit, April 26, 2025
Introduction
At the inaugural Bitcoin Insurance Summit in Miami, I had the pleasure of sharing two historical parallels that illuminate why "Bitcoin needs insurance, and insurance needs Bitcoin." The insurance industry's reactions to fire and coffee can help us better understand the profound relationship between emerging technologies, risk management, and commercial innovation.
Fire: Why Bitcoin Needs Insurance
The first story explores how the insurance industry's response to catastrophic urban fires shaped modern building safety. Following devastating events like the Great Fire of London (1666) and the Great Chicago Fire (1871), the nascent insurance industry began engaging with fire risk systematically.
Initially, insurers offered private fire brigades to policyholders who displayed their company's fire mark on their buildings. This evolved into increasingly sophisticated risk assessment and pricing models throughout the 19th century:
- Early 19th century: Basic risk classifications with simple underwriting based on rules of thumb
- Mid-19th century: Detailed construction types and cooperative sharing of loss data through trade associations
- Late 19th/Early 20th century: Scientific, data-driven approaches with differentiated rate pricing
The insurance industry fundamentally transformed building construction practices by developing evidence-based standards that would later inform regulatory frameworks. Organizations like the National Board of Fire Underwriters (founded 1866) and Underwriters Laboratories (established 1894) tested and standardized new technologies, turning seemingly risky innovations like electricity into safer, controlled advancements.
This pattern offers a powerful precedent for Bitcoin. Like electricity, Bitcoin represents a new technology that appears inherently risky but has tremendous potential for society. By engaging with Bitcoin rather than avoiding it, the insurance industry can develop evidence-based standards, implement proper controls, and ultimately make the entire Bitcoin ecosystem safer and more robust.
Coffee: Why Insurance Needs Bitcoin
The second story reveals how coffee houses in 17th-century England became commercial hubs that gave birth to modern insurance. Nathaniel Canopius brewed the first documented cup of coffee in England in 1637. But it wasn't until advances in navigation and shipping technology opened new trade lanes that coffee became truly ubiquitous in England. Once global trade blossomed, coffee houses rapidly spread throughout London, becoming centers of business, information exchange, and innovation.
In 1686, Edward Lloyd opened his coffee house catering to sailors, merchants, and shipowners, which would eventually evolve into Lloyd's of London. Similarly, Jonathan's Coffee House became the birthplace of what would become the London Stock Exchange.
These coffee houses functioned as information networks where merchants could access shipping news and trade opportunities, as well as risk management solutions. They created a virtuous cycle: better shipping technology brought more coffee, which fueled commerce and led to better marine insurance and financing, which in turn improved global trade.
Today, we're experiencing a similar technological and financial revolution with Bitcoin. This digital, programmable money moves at the speed of light and operates 24/7 as a nearly $2 trillion asset class. The insurance industry stands to benefit tremendously by embracing this innovation early.
Conclusion
The lessons from history are clear. Just as the insurance industry drove safety improvements by engaging with fire risk, it can help develop standards and best practices for Bitcoin security. And just as coffee houses created commercial networks that revolutionized finance, insurance, and trade, Bitcoin offers new pathways for global commerce and risk management.
For the insurance industry to remain relevant in a rapidly digitizing world, it must engage with Bitcoin rather than avoid it. The companies that recognize this opportunity first will enjoy significant advantages, while those who resist change risk being left behind.
The Bitcoin Insurance Summit represented an important first step in creating the collaborative spaces needed for this transformation—a modern version of those innovative coffee houses that changed the world over three centuries ago.
View Aaron's full keynote:
https://youtu.be/eIjT1H2XuCU
For more information about how Resolvr can help your organization leverage Bitcoin in its operations, contact us today.
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:23:25
-
@ 4e616576:43c4fee8
2025-04-30 09:57:29
asdf
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:21:52
-
@ 4e616576:43c4fee8
2025-04-30 09:48:05
asdfasdflkjasdf
-
@ e4950c93:1b99eccd
2025-04-30 09:20:50
Qu'est-ce qu'une matière naturelle ? La question fait débat, et chacun-e privilégiera ses propres critères. Voici comment les matières sont classées sur ce site. La liste est régulièrement mise à jour en fonction des produits ajoutés. N'hésitez pas à partager votre avis !
✅ Matières naturelles
Matières d'origine végétale, animale ou minérale, sans transformation chimique altérant leur structure moléculaire.
🌱 Principaux critères : - Biodégradabilité - Non-toxicité - Présence naturelle nécessitant le minimum de transformation
🔍 Liste des matières naturelles : - Bois - Cellulose régénérée (cupra, lyocell, modal, viscose) - Chanvre - Coton - Cuir - Latex naturel, caoutchouc - Liège - Lin - Laine - Métal - Soie - Terre - Verre - … (Autres matières)
⚠️ Bien que "naturelles", ces matières peuvent générer des impacts négatifs selon leurs conditions de production (pollution par pesticides, consommation d’eau excessive, traitement chimique, exploitation animale…). Ces impacts sont mentionnés sur la fiche de chaque matière.
Les versions biologiques de ces matières (sans traitement chimique, maltraitance animale, etc.) sont privilégiées pour référencer les produits sur ce site, tel qu'indiqué sur la fiche de chaque matière (à venir).
Les versions conventionnelles ne sont référencées que tant que lorsqu'il n'a pas encore été trouvé d'alternative plus durable pour cette catégorie de produits.
🚫 Matières non naturelles
Matières synthétiques ou fortement modifiées, souvent issues de la pétrochimie.
📌 Principaux problèmes : - Toxicité et émissions de microplastiques - Dépendance aux énergies fossiles - Mauvaise biodégradabilité
🔍 Liste des matières non naturelles : - Acrylique - Élasthanne, lycra, spandex - Polyamides, nylon - Polyester - Silicone - … (Autres matières)
⚠️ Ces matières ne sont pas admises sur le site. Néanmoins, elles peuvent être présentes dans certains produits référencés lorsque :
- elles sont utilisées en accessoire amovible (ex. : élastiques, boutons… généralement non indiqué dans la composition par la marque) pouvant être retiré pour le recyclage ou compostage, et
- aucune alternative 100 % naturelle n’a encore été identifiée pour cette catégorie de produits.
Dans ce cas, un avertissement est alors affiché sur la fiche du produit.
Cet article est publié sur origine-nature.com 🌐 See this article in English
-
@ 6c67a3f3:b0ebd196
2025-04-30 08:40:15
To explore the link between Gavekal-style platform companies and the US dollar's status as the global reserve currency, we need to view the problem through multiple interlocking lenses—monetary economics, network effects, macro-political architecture, financial plumbing, and the logic of platform capitalism. Gavekal’s conceptual framework focuses heavily on capital-light, scalable businesses that act as platforms rather than traditional linear firms. Their model emphasizes "soft" balance sheets, asset-light capital formation, high intangible value creation, and the scaling of network effects. These traits dovetail in complex ways with the structural position of the United States in the global financial system.
What follows is a broad and recursive dissection of how these two phenomena—platform companies and reserve currency status—are mutually constitutive, each feeding the other, both directly and via second- and third-order effects.
- The Core Metaphor: Platforms and Monetary Hegemony
At its root, a platform is a meta-infrastructure—a set of protocols and affordances that enable others to interact, produce, consume, and transact. The dollar, as reserve currency, functions in an analogous way. It is not merely a medium of exchange but a platform for global commerce, pricing, credit formation, and risk transfer.
In this metaphor, the United States is not just a country but a platform operator of global finance. And like Amazon or Apple, it enforces terms of access, extracts rents, underwrites standardization, and benefits disproportionately from marginal activity across its ecosystem. Just as Apple's App Store tax or Amazon’s marketplace fee are invisible to most users, the dollar hegemon collects global seigniorage, institutional influence, and capital inflow not as overt tolls, but through the structuring of default behaviors.
This already suggests a deep isomorphism between platform logic and reserve currency logic.
- Capital-Light Scaffolding and Global Dollar Demand
Gavekal-style firms (e.g. Apple, Google, Microsoft) have something unusual in common: they generate high levels of free cash flow with low reinvestment needs. That is, they do not soak up global capital so much as recycle it outward, often via share buybacks or bond issuance. This creates a paradox: they are net issuers of dollar-denominated financial claims even as they are net accumulators of global income.
Now map this onto the structure of reserve currency systems. The US must export financial assets to the world (Treasuries, MBS, high-grade corporates) in order to satisfy foreign demand for dollar claims. But traditional exporting economies (e.g. Germany, China) create excess savings they must park in safe dollar assets, while running trade surpluses.
Gavekal-style firms allow the US to square a circle. The US economy does not need to run trade surpluses, because its platform companies export “intangible products” at near-zero marginal cost (e.g. iOS, search ads, cloud infrastructure), generate global rents, and then repatriate those earnings into US financial markets. These flows offset the US current account deficit, plugging the "Triffin dilemma" (the need to run deficits to supply dollars while maintaining credibility).
Thus, platform companies act as soft exporters, replacing industrial exports with intangible, rent-generating capital. Their global cash flows are then recycled through dollar-denominated assets, providing the scale and liquidity necessary to sustain reserve status.
- The Hierarchy of Money and Intangible Collateral
Modern monetary systems rest on a hierarchy of collateral—some assets are more money-like than others. US Treasuries sit at the apex, but AAA-rated corporates, especially those with global footprints and balance-sheet integrity, are close behind.
Platform firms are unique in their capacity to create high-quality, globally accepted private collateral. Apple’s bonds, Microsoft’s equity, and Google’s cash reserves function as synthetic dollar instruments, widely accepted, liquid, and backed by consistent income streams. These firms extend the reach of the dollar system by providing dollar-denominated assets outside the banking system proper, further embedding dollar logic into global capital flows.
Moreover, platform companies often internalize global tax arbitrage, holding cash offshore (or in tax-efficient jurisdictions) and issuing debt domestically. This creates a loop where foreign dollar claims are used to finance US domestic consumption or investment, but the underlying income comes from global activities. This is reverse colonization through intangibles.
- Winner-Take-Most Dynamics and Network Effects in Dollar Space
The dollar system, like platform capitalism, obeys a power-law distribution. Liquidity begets liquidity. The more that dollar instruments dominate global trade, the more pricing, settlement, and hedging mechanisms are built around them. This self-reinforcing loop mimics network effect entrenchment: the more users a platform has, the harder it is to displace.
Reserve currency status is not a product of GDP share alone. It’s a function of infrastructure, institutional depth, legal recourse, capital mobility, and networked habits. Likewise, Apple’s dominance is not just about better phones, but about developer lock-in, payment systems, user base, and design mores.
Gavekal-style firms reinforce this pattern: their software platforms often denominate activity in dollars, price in dollars, store value in dollars, and link digital labor across borders into dollar-based flows. YouTube creators in Jakarta are paid in dollars. AWS charges Chilean entrepreneurs in dollars. App Store remittances to Kenya settle in dollars.
This creates global micro-tributaries of dollar flows, all of which aggregate into the larger river that sustains dollar supremacy.
- Geopolitical Power Projection by Private Means
Traditional hegemonic systems project power through military, legal, and diplomatic tools. But platforms provide soft control mechanisms. The US can influence foreign populations and elite behavior not merely through embassies and aircraft carriers, but through tech platforms that shape discourse, information flows, norms, and cognitive frames.
This is a kind of cognitive imperialism, in which reserve currency status is bolstered by the fact that cultural products (e.g. Netflix, social media, productivity tools) are encoded in American norms, embedded in American legal systems, and paid for in American currency.
The platform firm thus becomes a shadow extension of statecraft, whether or not it sees itself that way. Dollar hegemony is reinforced not only by Treasury markets and SWIFT access, but by the gravity of the mental ecosystem within which the global bourgeoisie operates. To earn, spend, invest, create, and dream within American-built systems is to keep the dollar central by default.
- Second-Order Effects: The Intangibility Ratchet and Global Liquidity Traps
An overlooked consequence of Gavekal-style platform dominance is that global capital formation becomes disembodied. That is, tangible projects—factories, infrastructure, energy systems—become less attractive relative to financial or intangible investments.
As a result, much of the world, especially the Global South, becomes capital-starved even as capital is abundant. Why? Because the returns on tangible investment are less scalable, less defensible, and less liquid than buying FAANG stocks or US Treasuries.
This results in a liquidity trap at the global scale: too much capital chasing too few safe assets, which only reinforces demand for dollar instruments. Meanwhile, intangible-intensive firms deepen their moats by mining attention, user data, and payment flows—often without any large-scale employment or industrial externalities.
Thus, Gavekal-style firms create asymmetric global development, further concentrating economic gravitational mass in the dollar zone.
- Feedback Loops and Fragility
All of this breeds both strength and fragility. On one hand, platform firm cash flows make the dollar system seem robust—anchored in cash-generative monopolies with global reach. On the other hand, the system becomes narrower and more brittle. When so much of global liquidity is intermediated through a few firms and the sovereign system that hosts them, any attack on these nodes—financial, legal, technological, or geopolitical—could unseat the equilibrium.
Moreover, platform logic tends to reduce systemic redundancy. It optimizes for efficiency, not resilience. It centralizes control, narrows option sets, and abstracts real production into code. If the dollar system ever loses credibility—through inflation, sanctions overreach, geopolitical backlash, or platform fatigue—the network effects could reverse violently.
- Conclusion: The Intangible Empire
The United States today operates an empire of intangibles, in which reserve currency status and platform firm dominance are co-constituted phenomena. Each reinforces the other:
Platform firms channel global rents into dollar instruments.
The dollar system provides legal scaffolding, liquidity, and pricing infrastructure for these firms.
Global user bases are conditioned into dollar-denominated interaction by default.
Financial markets treat platform firms as synthetic sovereigns: safe, liquid, predictable.
What is left is a cybernetic loop of financialized cognition: the dollar is strong because platform firms dominate, and platform firms dominate because the dollar is strong.
This loop may persist longer than many expect, but it is not permanent. Its unravelling, when it comes, will likely not be driven by any single actor, but by the erosion of symbolic power, the emergence of parallel platforms, or the ecological unsustainability of the model. But for now, the Gavekal firm and the dollar empire are the two poles of a single global architecture—seen best not as cause and effect, but as the two faces of the same Janus coin.
-
@ 4e616576:43c4fee8
2025-04-30 09:42:33
lorem ipsum
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:29:49
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:28:10
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:27:29
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:26:03
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:24:55
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:23:00
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:22:12
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 09:19:41
What is a natural material? It's a topic of debate, and everyone will prioritize their own criteria. Here’s how materials are classified on this site. The list is regularly updated based on the products added. Feel free to share your thoughts!
✅ Natural Materials
Materials of plant, animal, or mineral origin, without chemical transformation that alters their molecular structure.
🌱 Main Criteria: - Biodegradability - Non-toxicity - Naturally occurring and recquiring minimal transformation
🔍 List of Natural Materials: - Regenerated Cellulose (cupra, lyocell, modal, rayon) - Cork - Cotton - Earth - Glass - Hemp - Natural Latex, rubber - Leather - Linen - Metal - Silk - Wood - Wool - … (Other materials)
⚠️ Although "natural", these materials can have negative impacts depending on their production conditions (pesticide pollution, excessive water consumption, chemical treatments, animal exploitation, etc.). These impacts are mentionned in the description of each material.
Organic versions of these materials — free from chemical treatments, animal mistreatment, etc. — are preferred for listing products on this site, as indicated on each material's page (coming soon).
Conventional versions are only referenced when no more sustainable alternative has yet been found for that product category.
🚫 Non-Natural Materials
Synthetic or heavily modified materials, often derived from petrochemicals.
📌 Main Issues: - Toxicity and microplastic emissions - Dependence on fossil fuels - Poor biodegradability
🔍 List of Non-Natural Materials: - Acrylic - Elastane, spandex, lycra - Polyamides, nylon - Polyester - Silicone - … (Other materials)
⚠️ These materials are not accepted on this site. However, they may be present in certain listed products if:
- they are used in removable accessories (e.g., elastics, buttons—often not listed in the product’s composition by the brand) that can be detached for recycling or composting, and
- no 100% natural alternative has yet been identified for that product category.
In such cases, a warning will be displayed on the product page.
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 08:36:29
Happy to have found useful information on this site?
Support the project by making a donation to keep it running and thank the contributors.
In bitcoin
-
On-chain: bc1qkm8me8l9563wvsl9sklzt4hdcuny3tlejznj7d
-
Lightning network: ⚡️
origin-nature@coinos.ioYou can also support us on a recurring basis 👉 Set up a recurring Lightning payment
In euros, dollars, or any other supported currency
-
By bank transfer, IBAN: FR76 2823 3000 0144 3759 8717 669
-
You can also support us on a recurring basis 👉 Make a pledge on LiberaPay
Contact us if you’d like to make a donation using any other cryptocurrency.
💡 A Value-Sharing Model
Half of the donations are redistributed to the contributors who create the site's value, experimenting with a revenue-sharing model on the Internet—one that respects your data and doesn’t seek to capture your attention. The other half helps cover the site's operating costs.
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français
-
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 08:34:54
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 08:33:41
Core Team
The Core Team drives the project and validates the content.
- Jean-David Bar: https://njump.me/npub1qr4p7uamcpawv7cr8z9nlhmd60lylukf7lvmtlnpe7r4juwxudzq3hrnll
To start, I'm managing the project solo by sharing my bookmarks to avoid plastic on ourselves and on our children. Contact me if you'd like to join!
Content Enrichers
Our contributors make this site engaging and interesting.
Coming soon.
👉 Learn more about contributions
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 08:32:38
Finding 100% natural, plastic-free products turned out to be much harder than I expected… So I started collecting bookmarks. And then I thought: "What if we shared?!
Help me discover the best natural alternatives for clothing and gear without plastic!
This project is all about sharing: half of the site's potential revenue is redistributed to contributors. A small experiment in revenue and value sharing on the internet. :-)
Q&A
Why focus on natural materials?
Synthetic materials are mostly plastics (polyester, polyamide…). The problem? They end up contaminating us:
- Microplastics absorbed through the skin,
- Particles released with every wash, making their way into the water we drink and the food we eat,
- Major challenges in recycling plastic waste.
What exactly are natural materials?
They are non-synthetic materials, whose components exist in nature without molecular modification. But what really matters here is their biodegradability and non-toxicity.
Some materials may spark debates about their acceptability on this site!
How is this different from other ethical fashion or shopping websites?
Many websites offer ethical and sustainable products, but I often found they still included synthetic materials. I had to check every product individually. Some promote recycled plastic fibers as an eco-friendly choice, but I’d rather not put plastic on my skin or my children's.
How can I contribute?
If you find this project useful or interesting, here’s how you can support it:
-
📝 Contribute: suggest edits by commenting on existing entries or propose new product or brand references. 👉 Learn more about contributions
-
⚡ Donate: Help sustain the project and support contributors. 👉 Learn more about donations
-
📢 Spread the word: Share the site on social media, your blog…
How can I receive a share of the site’s revenue?
You need a NOSTR account and a Bitcoin Lightning address.
What is NOSTR?
NOSTR is a decentralized internet protocol, still experimental, that allows you to:
- Publish and browse content without relying on a centralized platform.
- Log in to multiple services while keeping full control over your data.
- Use the Bitcoin Lightning network for instant, peer-to-peer payments.
What about my data privacy?
- No ads, no personalized tracking.
- NOSTR comments are public, but you can use a pseudonym.
- You retain ownership of your contributions on the NOSTR protocol.
Who is behind this project?
We use open-source tools and services:
- NOSTR for content publishing and contributions checking,
- npub.pro for content visualization,
- Coinos.io for payment management.
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français
-
@ a5142938:0ef19da3
2025-04-30 08:32:01
Rewards are an experimental approach to sharing the value created by contributors to this site, through a revenue-sharing system based on the following conditions:
- Any revenue generated by the site each month is distributed over the following 12 months, ensuring long-term visibility and smoothing out monthly variations.
- On the 1st of each month, half of the revenue is distributed among all contributors, in proportion to the number of their validated contributions.
- Contributions remain valid indefinitely, but rewards are only distributed to contributors who have made at least one validated contribution in the past 12 months.
Payment Method
Rewards are paid via the Lightning network, in sats (the smallest unit of Bitcoin).
To receive payments, you must have a NOSTR account linked to a Lightning wallet.
To receive them, the NOSTR account used to contribute must be linked to a Lightning wallet.
💡 New to these tools? - Don’t have a NOSTR account yet? A simple way to get started is to create one on an open-source NOSTR client like yakihonne.com to set up your profile and wallet there. Then, retrieve your NOSTR keys (from the settings) and save them in a secure vault like nsec.app to log in here and start contributing. - Already started contributing on this site? Make sure to securely store your NOSTR keys in a vault like nsec.app. You can also log in with them on yakihonne.com to set up your profile. - You can also contribute directly from yakihonne.com by commenting on Origine Nature’s articles.
👉 Learn more about contributions
Next rewards
Coming soon.
This article is published on origin-nature.com 🌐 Voir cet article en français