-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ 629c4a12:f822cc1a
2025-02-23 21:33:31
I’ve always been drawn to minimalism. There’s a certain peace that comes from stripping away the unnecessary, decluttering both physical and mental spaces. Yet, when it comes to finances, I’ve found myself tangled in complexity. As an ‘optimizer,’ I spend an inordinate amount of time thinking about investments, managing risk, and endlessly tinkering with my portfolio. This preoccupation contradicts the minimalist principles I try to live by.
It seems absurd to me that the financial world has become so complicated that we need money managers to simply preserve the value of our money. If investing is so intricate that the average person must hire professionals just to preserve (let alone grow) the value of their savings, then something is fundamentally wrong.
For the past five years, I’ve immersed myself in the history and mechanics of financial systems. The deeper I delved, the clearer it became: Bitcoin is a force of minimalism in an increasingly financialized and complex world.
### The Clutter of Modern Finance
Our financial system has become bloated with complexity. The hyper-securitization of assets has created an environment filled with financial clutter. Derivatives, for example, represent layers upon layers of financial engineering, often so convoluted that even experts struggle to understand them fully.
More troubling is the way nearly everything of value has been financialized. Real estate and art, two things that should embody personal value and cultural significance, have been transformed into mere asset classes. They are bought, sold, and speculated upon not for their intrinsic qualities but as instruments in the game of wealth preservation.
But why has this happened? It’s actually quite simple: our money is constantly losing value. The dollar, for example, debases at a rate of around 7% per year. Holding cash feels like holding melting ice, so it’s only natural for people to seek out scarce assets to preserve their wealth.
The Never-Ending Game of Diversification
This pursuit of scarce assets sets off a complex game—a game that forces people to diversify endlessly:
* Equities
* Bonds
* Real Estate
* Commodities
* Art
* Collectibles
We’re told to spread our investments across these asset classes to mitigate risk and preserve our hard-earned money. Those who can afford to hire money managers generally fare better in this game, as they have access to expertise and strategies designed to navigate this maze of complexity.
Ironically, this system creates an incentive for more complexity. The more convoluted the financial landscape becomes, the more we need money managers, and the more entrenched this cycle of financialization and securitization becomes. It’s a force of ever-increasing entropy—quite the opposite of minimalism.
### Bitcoin: Simplicity in a Complex World
In the midst of this financial chaos, Bitcoin emerges as a beacon of simplicity. It offers a way out of the clutter, a chance to reclaim financial minimalism. Bitcoin embodies the concept of scarcity with a rare kind of perfection: there will only ever be 21 million Bitcoins. No more.
This scarcity makes Bitcoin the perfect savings technology. Unlike traditional currencies, no one can debase your holdings. You don’t need to chase after real estate, art, or other assets to preserve your wealth. You don’t need to constantly diversify and rebalance a portfolio to stay ahead of inflation. Bitcoin’s scarcity gives you a way to hold your wealth securely, without the need for endless tinkering.
I’m not blind to Bitcoin’s short-term price volatility. However, it’s crucial to understand that we’re still in the early stages of adoption. As more people embrace this perfect form of scarcity, Bitcoin’s qualities as savings technology will express itself.
Bitcoin has the potential to de-financialize the housing market. It can de-financialize art.
Ultimately, Bitcoin has the power to replace those aspects of our lives that currently serve as proxies for scarcity.
### A Minimalist Approach to Wealth
Bitcoin allows us to step off the treadmill of constant financial optimization. It offers a simpler way to safeguard the fruits of our labor. Rather than spending our time, energy, and attention on navigating a complex financial system, we can focus on what truly matters: living a meaningful life.
By embracing Bitcoin, we embrace a minimalist approach to wealth. We reject the idea that we must play a never-ending game of diversification to maintain our standard of living. Instead, we adopt a simple, elegant solution that aligns with the principles of minimalism.
### Conclusion
In a world that grows more financially cluttered by the day, Bitcoin stands as a path to financial minimalism. It frees us from the complexities of traditional finance, allowing us to preserve our wealth without the need for constant vigilance and management.
By embodying scarcity and simplicity, Bitcoin gives us a way to reclaim our time and energy. It’s not just a financial tool; it’s a way to simplify our lives, to step back from the chaos, and to focus on what truly matters
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ 378562cd:a6fc6773
2025-02-23 20:41:59
Social media platforms like Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) have long dominated online communication. However, many people are looking for alternatives due to increasing censorship, algorithmic manipulation, and corporate control over user data. One of the most promising new protocols I have found is Nostr, a decentralized and open-source alternative to traditional social media. But how does Nostr compare, and why should you consider making the switch? If you're reading this, presumably, you already have made the switch, but share this with friends if you like. Let’s dive in.
The Fundamental Differences Between Nostr and Traditional Social Media
1. Decentralization vs. Centralization
Facebook and X are owned and operated by massive corporations that control everything from content moderation to algorithmic visibility. Your posts, followers, and interactions are at the mercy of the company's policies and changes.
Nostr: No single entity owns Nostr. It operates as a protocol where anyone can run a relay (a server that transmits messages). Users are not tied to a single company or platform, ensuring freedom from corporate control.
2. Censorship Resistance
Facebook & X: Heavily moderate content, often removing posts or banning accounts based on internal policies, government pressure, or **advertiser** demands.
Nostr: Built to resist censorship. Since users publish to multiple relays, blocking content on one relay does not remove it from others. You control where your messages are sent, not a centralized authority.
3. User Ownership and Privacy
Facebook & X: Your data is stored on corporate servers and often sold to advertisers. You don’t truly own your content or connections.
Nostr: Users control their private keys, which function like cryptographic signatures. Your identity is yours alone, and no company can take it away.
4. Algorithm-Free Experience
Facebook & X: Content is curated by algorithms that determine what you see based on engagement metrics, often promoting divisive or viral content over meaningful conversations.
Nostr: No forced algorithms. You decide which relays to use and what content to follow. Your feed remains chronological and free from corporate influence.
Pros and Cons of Nostr
✅ Pros:
True freedom of speech: No corporate moderation, allowing open discussion.
User-owned identity: You control your account with a cryptographic key.
No ads or tracking: Your data isn’t harvested or sold to advertisers.
Resilient against shutdowns: Multiple relays ensure content persists even if one relay goes offline.
Customizable experience: Choose the relays and clients that best suit your needs.
❌ Cons (If Any):
Early-stage adoption: Not as many users as Facebook or X (yet!).
Technical learning curve: Requires setting up keys and understanding relays, though improving rapidly.
Lack of centralized moderation: While this is a pro for free speech, it can also mean exposure to spam or undesirable content if it is not filtered properly. However, they are developing hidden or block features to help control your feeds. I don't have a lot of worries here. To be perfectly honest, it seems like a better class of people come here.
Why Should You Leave Facebook and Join Nostr?
If you’re tired of algorithmic manipulation, invasive tracking, and corporate censorship, Nostr offers a fresh start. It’s a place where your voice truly belongs to you, and a centralized authority cannot control your connections.
Yes, it may take some time to adjust to using Nostr, but the benefits far outweigh the minor learning curve. If you value digital freedom, privacy, and resistance to censorship, now is the perfect time to explore the future of social networking.
How to Get Your Friends to Leave Corporate Social Media and Join Nostr
Switching to Nostr is one thing, but convincing your friends to make the leap can be challenging. Here are some practical ways to help them transition:
Explain the benefits: Many people don’t realize how much control corporations have over their online experience. Share this article and highlight the key points.
Make it easy: Walk them through setting up a Nostr account, generating a private key, and connecting to relays.
Show them the community: Introduce them to active Nostr users, groups, and discussions to make the transition feel worthwhile.
Lead by example: Use Nostr consistently and post compelling content that makes it appealing to your friends.
Keep the conversation going. As more people join, Nostr will become even more engaging, making it a true alternative to corporate-controlled platforms.
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ badc29af:a92bd071
2025-02-23 20:34:58
**Part I: The First Hour (Blocks 694,200–694,205)**
**Block 694,200: The Coder**\
Sarah Chen sat hunched over her keyboard in her San Francisco apartment, the fog smudging her window. Debugging a fintech app, she watched block 694,200 confirm on the Bitcoin blockchain. Suddenly, its architecture snapped into focus: not just code, but a defiance of artificial abundance.\
"Holy shit," she whispered, easing back from her desk, her monitor casting light on scattered ramen cups. She’d coded financial systems for years, but now she saw money’s true potential—scarce, digital, unbound.
**Block 694,201: The Entrepreneur**\
Ten minutes later, in a steamy Lagos cybercafé, James Okonjo’s world shifted as block 694,201 locked in. Struggling with payment delays under Nigeria’s currency controls, he read about Bitcoin’s borderless flow.\
"No more gatekeepers," he said, startling nearby patrons. His hands shook as he set up his first wallet, already dreaming of a Bitcoin education platform for African developers.
**Block 694,202: The Economist**\
In Caracas, Maria Rodriguez paced before her Universidad Central de Venezuela class, dissecting inflation’s latest surge. As block 694,202 formed, the idea of fixed-supply money hit her like a revelation.\
"Forget this slide," she said, closing her laptop. "Let’s talk proof-of-work." Her students stared, but her mind was already racing with possibilities.
**Block 694,203: The Retiree**\
In Tokyo, Hiroshi Yamamoto sipped tea during his morning portfolio review when block 694,203 confirmed. A retired salaryman, he saw Bitcoin as a shield against decades of yen erosion. Quietly, he began researching wallets, his curiosity ignited.
**Block 694,204: The Prodigy**\
In Toronto, 16-year-old Emma Chen, a coding whiz, stumbled across block 694,204 while tinkering online. The power to program her own money dawned on her. She grinned, diving into Bitcoin’s whitepaper with reckless glee.
**Block 694,205: The Shopkeeper**\
In Buenos Aires, Carlos Mendoza tallied his shop’s dwindling profits as block 694,205 ticked into existence. Sick of the peso’s collapse, he found Bitcoin—an escape from financial quicksand. By nightfall, he’d downloaded a wallet app.
---
**Part II: The First Day (Blocks 694,206–694,343)**
**The Morning Wave (Blocks 694,206–694,247)**\
Over the next 42 blocks—about seven hours—as Asia slept and Europe stirred, the awakenings multiplied:
**Block 694,206**: A Swiss banker questioned her fiat career.
**Block 694,207**: A German programmer marveled at Bitcoin’s consensus beauty.
**Block 694,208**: A Korean gamer saw virtual gold turn real.\
The chain hummed, each block birthing new believers, ten minutes apart.
**The American Session (Blocks 694,248–694,295)**\
As Wall Street woke, blocks 694,248 to 694,295—eight hours—marked a finance-world reckoning:
**Block 694,248**: A Connecticut hedge fund manager saw through fiat’s illusions.
**Block 694,249**: A Chicago commodities trader grasped digital scarcity.
**Block 694,250**: A Texas pension admin envisioned a sounder future.\
Each block stamped a timestamp on their transformation.
**The Global South Rises (Blocks 694,296–694,343)**\
The day’s final stretch—48 blocks, eight more hours—saw the global south ignite:
**Block 694,296**: Brazilian students planned Bitcoin beach hubs.
**Block 694,297**: Indonesian merchants linked Lightning payment loops.
**Block 694,298**: South African miners turned solar power into hash rate.\
The chain pulsed, relentless, binding them all.
---
**Part III: The Network Effect (Beyond Block 694,343)**
**The Teachers (Block 694,344)**\
Sarah quit her job at block 694,344, coding Bitcoin education tools. James’s platform launched, reaching Africa’s devs. Maria’s NOSTR lectures spread, her voice a beacon.
**The Builders (Block 694,345)**\
At block 694,345, innovation bloomed: privacy upgrades, scaling fixes, Lightning finance tools. The awakened built atop the chain.
**The HODLers (Block 694,346)**\
By block 694,346, others simply held—silent sentinels whose faith grew with each block, each halving.
---
**Epilogue: The Endless Chain (Blocks Onward)**
The awakening rolled on, ten minutes at a time. Block 694,347 saw a Mumbai coder join Sarah’s cause. Block 694,348 brought a Nairobi merchant to James’s platform. Block 694,349 swayed a Manila policymaker with Maria’s words.
Every block—144 a day—sparked new stories: dreamers seeking freedom, builders crafting tools, HODLers standing firm. Money, they understood, was too vital to be ruled by power. From block 694,200, the chain stretched forward, a living testament to scarcity, ownership, math over might.
Each block was a birth, each hash a heartbeat, each Bitcoiner a node in a network of financial truth—marching on, block by block, toward a harder, sounder world, forever verified, never permissioned, growing but never diluted, ten minutes at a time.
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ 629c4a12:f822cc1a
2025-02-23 20:27:36
This is test 2
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ 573d3e22:c2f41d22
2025-02-23 20:17:32
this is a test
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ d34e832d:383f78d0
2025-02-23 19:53:32
Hockeypuck is an **OpenPGP keyserver** that allows users to publish, search, and retrieve **PGP public keys** for secure communication. It is designed for **federation** with other keyservers and supports a **high-performance, scalable** architecture.
---
## **🛠️ Usage**
### **1. Public PGP Key Directory**
- Organizations, security researchers, and privacy-focused users can **publish and retrieve PGP keys** for encrypted email and document verification.
- Similar to **SKS Keyserver**, but actively maintained and more scalable.
### **2. Enterprise PGP Key Management**
- Companies can **host a private keyserver** for internal teams to share PGP keys securely.
- Prevents reliance on external keyservers like keys.openpgp.org.
### **3. Decentralized Identity and Key Distribution**
- Used in federated **PGP keyserver networks** like **Hockeypuck & SKS pools** to distribute OpenPGP keys across multiple servers.
- Useful for **distributed trust models** where multiple organizations manage keys collaboratively.
### **4. Bitcoin & Nostr Applications**
- Can be used alongside **Nostr** for key verification, ensuring public keys are retrievable for cryptographic signatures.
- Useful in **Bitcoin** applications where PGP-signed messages confirm identity.
### **5. Software Package Signing**
- Developers and package maintainers can **sign software updates** using OpenPGP, and end users can fetch public keys from Hockeypuck to verify authenticity.
- Example: **Debian and Arch Linux package signing**.
### **6. Secure Messaging**
- Supports secure email systems using **PGP-encrypted mail (e.g., ProtonMail, Thunderbird + Enigmail, Mailpile, etc.)**.
---
## **📌 Key Benefits**
✅ **Docker-Based Deployment** → Easily installable with **Docker** and **docker-compose**.
✅ **Federated Keyserver** → Can join existing **PGP keyserver networks**.
✅ **High-Performance Storage** → Uses PostgreSQL for better performance than older SKS keyservers.
✅ **Supports HTTP & HTTPS** → Can be hosted publicly with **TLS encryption**.
✅ **Fully Open Source** → Maintained as a modern alternative to SKS.
## **🔑 Signing a Nostr Event Using PGP & Verifying It on a Relay**
If Alice wants to **prove she controls `npub1xyz...`** using **PGP**, she can sign a Nostr event and publish both the event and signature.
---
### **🔹 Step 1: Create a Nostr Event (Kind 0)**
Alice generates a **Nostr profile metadata event**:
```json
{
"id": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"pubkey": "npub1xyz...",
"created_at": 1700000000,
"kind": 0,
"tags": [],
"content": "{ \"name\": \"Alice\", \"about\": \"PGP Verified Nostr User\" }"
}
```
She saves this as **`nostr_event.json`**.
---
### **🔹 Step 2: Sign the Event with PGP**
Alice uses GnuPG to sign the event:
```bash
gpg --clearsign --armor nostr_event.json
```
This creates **`nostr_event.json.asc`**, which contains the event with a **PGP signature**.
🔹 **Example of the signed event:**
```
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
{
"id": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"pubkey": "npub1xyz...",
"created_at": 1700000000,
"kind": 0,
"tags": [],
"content": "{ \"name\": \"Alice\", \"about\": \"PGP Verified Nostr User\" }"
}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEbGSk4HTlMz5tG0tF0Y8fO3HTQYYFAmS8mOkACgkQ0Y8fO3HT
QYYX4w/+JwzbfM1EZ2F7H3yqbdGBJ2cGd...
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
```
---
### **🔹 Step 3: Upload the Signature to a Public Keyserver**
Alice submits her signed Nostr event to the **Hockeypuck keyserver**:
```bash
curl --data-binary @nostr_event.json.asc https://keyserver.example.com/pks/add
```
---
### **🔹 Step 4: Publish the Event to a Nostr Relay**
Alice **publishes the original event** to a Nostr relay:
```bash
curl -X POST https://nostr-relay.example.com/ -d @nostr_event.json
```
---
### **🔹 Step 5: Verification**
Anyone can **fetch Alice’s PGP-signed event** and verify it:
```bash
curl "https://keyserver.example.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=alice@nostr.example.com" | gpg --verify
```
If successful, it will show:
```
gpg: Good signature from "Alice <alice@nostr.example.com>"
```
---
### **✅ Use Cases**
1. **Proving Ownership of a Nostr Public Key** with PGP.
2. **Bitcoin Applications**: PGP-signed messages can confirm identities for multisig coordination.
3. **Decentralized Web of Trust**: Verifying Nostr users via signed events.
---
Additionally a simple JS or python script could automate signing process.
-
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57a6d/57a6d58c413df85449677b9507f090c4a6942e61" alt=""
@ 3ffac3a6:2d656657
2025-02-23 19:40:19
## Renoters: Proposal for Anonymous Event Relaying in Nostr
*This document is a proposal and not an official NIP.*
This Document proposes "Renoters," a mechanism for anonymous event relaying in Nostr, inspired by the Mixminion remailer design. Renoters aim to enhance privacy by obscuring the origin of events, making it difficult to trace the author of a message.
### **Motivation**
While Nostr offers a decentralized platform, current relay mechanisms can potentially reveal the source of events. Renoters address this by introducing an onion-routing-like system where events are encrypted and relayed through a series of nodes, making it harder to link the event to its originator. This enhances privacy for users who wish to communicate anonymously or protect their identity.
In some totalitarian regimes, the use of Tor and VPNs is criminalized, making online anonymity dangerous. Even in some democratic countries, merely downloading Tor can mark individuals as suspects. This underscores the need for a decentralized and anonymous communication system that operates independently of commonly surveilled privacy tools.
### **Proposed Solution**
Renoters operate on the principle of "gift-wrapping" events, using asymmetric encryption. A user wishing to send an event anonymously performs the following steps:
1. **Event Creation:** The user creates the Nostr event they wish to publish.
2. **Renoter Path Selection:** The user selects a path of Renoters through which the event will be relayed. This path can be pre-configured or dynamically chosen.
3. **Gift Wrapping (Encryption and Signing):** The user encrypts and signs the event for each Renoter in the path, working in reverse order:
- A *new* random Nostr private key (`sk_wrapper`) is generated.
- The event (or the previously wrapped event) is encrypted using the *next* Renoter's Npub (`npub_next`) using Nostr's standard encryption mechanism (e.g., using shared secrets derived from the private key and the recipient's public key).
- A *new* Nostr event is created. This "wrapper" event's content contains the ciphertext. The wrapper event is signed using the newly generated private key `sk_wrapper`. The wrapper event also includes the next hop's `npub_next` (or the final destination if it's the last renoter) in cleartext, to allow for routing.
4. **Publication:** The user publishes the *first* gift-wrapped event (the one encrypted for the last Renoter in the path). This event is sent to a regular Nostr relay, which then forwards it to the first Renoter in the path.
5. **Renoter Relaying:** Each Renoter in the path receives the gift-wrapped event, verifies the signature using the `sk_wrapper`'s corresponding public key, decrypts it using its own private key, and forwards the decrypted event (now wrapped for the *next* Renoter) to the next Renoter in the path. This process continues until the event reaches the final Renoter.
6. **Final Delivery:** The final Renoter decrypts the event and publishes it to the Nostr network.
### **Example**
Let's say Alice wants to send an event anonymously through Renoters R1, R2, and R3.
1. Alice creates her event.
2. She generates a random private key `sk3` and encrypts the event with R3's public key `npub_r3`.
3. She creates a wrapper event containing the ciphertext and `npub_r3`, signed with `sk3`.
4. She generates a random private key `sk2` and encrypts the previous wrapper event with R2's public key `npub_r2`.
5. She creates a wrapper event containing this ciphertext and `npub_r2`, signed with `sk2`.
6. She generates a random private key `sk1` and encrypts the previous wrapper event with R1's public key `npub_r1`.
7. She creates a final wrapper event containing this ciphertext and `npub_r1`, signed with `sk1`.
8. Alice publishes this final wrapper event.
R1 decrypts with its private key, verifies the signature with the public key corresponding to `sk1`, and forwards to R2. R2 decrypts, verifies the signature with the public key corresponding to `sk2`, and forwards to R3. R3 decrypts, verifies the signature with the public key corresponding to `sk3`, and publishes the original event.
### **Renoter Incentives (using Cashu)**
To incentivize Renoters to participate in the network, this NIP proposes integrating Cashu tokens as a payment mechanism.
- **Token Inclusion:** When a user creates the initial gift-wrapped event (the one sent to the first Renoter), they include a Cashu token *within* the event content. This token is itself encrypted and wrapped along with the original message, so only the receiving Renoter can access it.
- **Renoter Redemption:** Upon receiving a gift-wrapped event, the Renoter decrypts it. If the event contains a Cashu token, the Renoter can decrypt the token and redeem it.
- **Renoter Behavior:** Paid Renoters would be configured *not* to relay events that do *not* contain a valid Cashu token. This ensures that Renoters are compensated for their service. Free Renoters could still exist, but paid Renoters would likely offer faster or more reliable service.
- **Token Value and Tiers:** Different Cashu token denominations could represent different levels of service (e.g., faster relaying, higher priority). This could create a tiered system where users can pay for better anonymity or speed.
- **Token Generation:** Users would need a way to acquire Cashu tokens. This could involve purchasing them from a Cashu mint or earning them through other means.
### **Security Threats and Mitigations**
- **Anonymity Against Correlation Attacks:** Even when using Tor, traffic patterns can still be analyzed to infer the origin of events. To mitigate this risk, Renoters can introduce:
- Random delays in event relaying.
- Dummy packets to complicate statistical analysis by malicious observers.
- **Replay Attacks:** To mitigate replay attacks, each Renoter must store, for a reasonable period, the IDs of received events and the decrypted events that were forwarded. This ensures that duplicate messages are not processed again.
- **Sybil Attacks:** Sybil attacks can be mitigated by requiring payments via Cashu tokens for relaying events, increasing the cost of launching such attacks. By ensuring that each relay operation has a monetary cost, attackers are discouraged from creating large numbers of fake identities to manipulate the network.
- **Traffic Analysis:** Traffic analysis can be mitigated by using Tor for Renoters. Routing events through the Tor network adds an additional layer of anonymity, making it more difficult to track message origins or infer sender-recipient relationships. While Renoters enhance privacy, sophisticated traffic analysis might still be a threat.
### **Operational Considerations**
- **Renoter Reliability:** The reliability of the Renoter network is crucial.
- **Latency:** Relaying through multiple Renoters will introduce latency.
- **Key Management:** While each layer uses a new key, the initial key generation and path selection process need to be secure.
This NIP provides a robust framework for anonymous event relaying in Nostr, leveraging encryption and Cashu-based incentives to enhance privacy and usability.
### **References**
- **Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms**: David L. Chaum (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/358549.358563)
- **Mixminion Design**: Mixminion: Design of a Type III Anonymous Remailer (https://www.mixminion.net/minion-design.pdf)
- **Nostr Protocol**: Official Nostr Documentation (https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr)
- **Cashu Token System**: Cashu: Ecash for Bitcoin Lightning (https://cashu.space/)
- **Tor Project**: The Tor Project - Anonymity Online (https://www.torproject.org/)
- **Onion Routing**: The Second-Generation Onion Router (https://svn.torproject.org/svn/projects/design-paper/tor-design.pdf)
#Privacy #Nostr #Anonymity #Crypto #CensorshipResistance #OnlinePrivacy #Decentralization #Encryption #Security #ThreatMitigation #Micropayments #CryptoEconomy #NextSteps #Development