-

@ d34e832d:383f78d0
2025-03-12 19:31:16
**Micro** with its operands and keybindings.
---
Micro is a modern, user-friendly text editor designed for the terminal. It offers extensive features, including mouse support, multiple cursors, syntax highlighting, and an intuitive command bar.
---
## **1. Command Bar**
- Open it with `Ctrl-e`
- Supports shell-like argument parsing (single/double quotes, escaping)
- No environment variable expansion
---
## **2. Commands Overview**
Commands are entered using `Ctrl-e` followed by the command.
### **File Management**
- `save ['filename']` → Save the current buffer (or "Save As" if a filename is given)
- `quit` → Exit Micro
- `open 'filename'` → Open a file
- `reopen` → Reload the current file from disk
- `pwd` → Print the current working directory
- `cd 'path'` → Change the working directory
### **Navigation**
- `goto 'line[:col]'` → Move to an absolute line and column
- `jump 'line[:col]'` → Move relative to the current line
### **Editing**
- `replace 'search' 'value' ['flags']` → Replace text
- `-a` → Replace all occurrences
- `-l` → Literal search (no regex)
- `replaceall 'search' 'value'` → Replace all without confirmation
- `textfilter 'sh-command'` → Pipe selected text through a shell command and replace it
### **Splitting and Tabs**
- `vsplit ['filename']` → Open a vertical split
- `hsplit ['filename']` → Open a horizontal split
- `tab ['filename']` → Open a file in a new tab
- `tabswitch 'tab'` → Switch between tabs
- `tabmove '[-+]n'` → Move tab position
### **Configuration**
- `set 'option' 'value'` → Set a global option
- `setlocal 'option' 'value'` → Set an option for the current buffer
- `show 'option'` → Show the current value of an option
- `reset 'option'` → Reset an option to its default
### **Plugins**
- `plugin list` → List installed plugins
- `plugin install 'pl'` → Install a plugin
- `plugin remove 'pl'` → Remove a plugin
- `plugin update ['pl']` → Update a plugin
- `plugin search 'pl'` → Search for plugins
### **Miscellaneous**
- `run 'sh-command'` → Run a shell command in the background
- `log` → View debug messages
- `reload` → Reload all runtime files (settings, keybindings, syntax files, etc.)
- `raw` → Debug terminal escape sequences
- `showkey 'key'` → Show what action is bound to a key
- `term ['exec']` → Open a terminal emulator running a specific command
- `lint` → Lint the current file
- `comment` → Toggle comments on a selected line or block
---
## **3. Keybindings Overview**
| **Action** | **Keybinding** |
|------------------|--------------|
| **Navigation** | |
| Move cursor left | `←` or `h` |
| Move cursor right | `→` or `l` |
| Move cursor up | `↑` or `k` |
| Move cursor down | `↓` or `j` |
| Move to start of line | `Home` |
| Move to end of line | `End` |
| Move to start of file | `Ctrl-Home` |
| Move to end of file | `Ctrl-End` |
| Move by word left | `Ctrl-←` or `Ctrl-b` |
| Move by word right | `Ctrl-→` or `Ctrl-f` |
| **Editing** | |
| Copy | `Ctrl-c` |
| Cut | `Ctrl-x` |
| Paste | `Ctrl-v` |
| Undo | `Ctrl-z` |
| Redo | `Ctrl-Shift-z` |
| Delete word left | `Ctrl-Backspace` |
| Delete word right | `Ctrl-Delete` |
| **Splitting & Tabs** | |
| Open horizontal split | `Ctrl-w h` |
| Open vertical split | `Ctrl-w v` |
| Switch tab left | `Alt-←` |
| Switch tab right | `Alt-→` |
For more, check the official keybindings:
🔗 [Micro Keybindings](https://github.com/zyedidia/micro/blob/master/runtime/help/keybindings.md)
🔗[Available Here](https://micro-editor.github.io/)
---
## **Final Thoughts**
Micro is a powerful text editor for terminal users who want an alternative to Vim or Nano. With an intuitive command bar, extensive customization options, and full plugin support, it offers a lightweight yet feature-rich editing experience. 🚀
-

@ 04c915da:3dfbecc9
2025-03-12 15:30:46
Recently we have seen a wave of high profile X accounts hacked. These attacks have exposed the fragility of the status quo security model used by modern social media platforms like X. Many users have asked if nostr fixes this, so lets dive in. How do these types of attacks translate into the world of nostr apps? For clarity, I will use X’s security model as representative of most big tech social platforms and compare it to nostr.
**The Status Quo**
On X, you never have full control of your account. Ultimately to use it requires permission from the company. They can suspend your account or limit your distribution. Theoretically they can even post from your account at will. An X account is tied to an email and password. Users can also opt into two factor authentication, which adds an extra layer of protection, a login code generated by an app. In theory, this setup works well, but it places a heavy burden on users. You need to create a strong, unique password and safeguard it. You also need to ensure your email account and phone number remain secure, as attackers can exploit these to reset your credentials and take over your account. Even if you do everything responsibly, there is another weak link in X infrastructure itself. The platform’s infrastructure allows accounts to be reset through its backend. This could happen maliciously by an employee or through an external attacker who compromises X’s backend. When an account is compromised, the legitimate user often gets locked out, unable to post or regain control without contacting X’s support team. That process can be slow, frustrating, and sometimes fruitless if support denies the request or cannot verify your identity. Often times support will require users to provide identification info in order to regain access, which represents a privacy risk. The centralized nature of X means you are ultimately at the mercy of the company’s systems and staff.
**Nostr Requires Responsibility**
Nostr flips this model radically. Users do not need permission from a company to access their account, they can generate as many accounts as they want, and cannot be easily censored. The key tradeoff here is that users have to take complete responsibility for their security. Instead of relying on a username, password, and corporate servers, nostr uses a private key as the sole credential for your account. Users generate this key and it is their responsibility to keep it safe. As long as you have your key, you can post. If someone else gets it, they can post too. It is that simple. This design has strong implications. Unlike X, there is no backend reset option. If your key is compromised or lost, there is no customer support to call. In a compromise scenario, both you and the attacker can post from the account simultaneously. Neither can lock the other out, since nostr relays simply accept whatever is signed with a valid key.
The benefit? No reliance on proprietary corporate infrastructure.. The negative? Security rests entirely on how well you protect your key.
**Future Nostr Security Improvements**
For many users, nostr’s standard security model, storing a private key on a phone with an encrypted cloud backup, will likely be sufficient. It is simple and reasonably secure. That said, nostr’s strength lies in its flexibility as an open protocol. Users will be able to choose between a range of security models, balancing convenience and protection based on need.
One promising option is a web of trust model for key rotation. Imagine pre-selecting a group of trusted friends. If your account is compromised, these people could collectively sign an event announcing the compromise to the network and designate a new key as your legitimate one. Apps could handle this process seamlessly in the background, notifying followers of the switch without much user interaction. This could become a popular choice for average users, but it is not without tradeoffs. It requires trust in your chosen web of trust, which might not suit power users or large organizations. It also has the issue that some apps may not recognize the key rotation properly and followers might get confused about which account is “real.”
For those needing higher security, there is the option of multisig using FROST (Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold). In this setup, multiple keys must sign off on every action, including posting and updating a profile. A hacker with just one key could not do anything. This is likely overkill for most users due to complexity and inconvenience, but it could be a game changer for large organizations, companies, and governments. Imagine the White House nostr account requiring signatures from multiple people before a post goes live, that would be much more secure than the status quo big tech model.
Another option are hardware signers, similar to bitcoin hardware wallets. Private keys are kept on secure, offline devices, separate from the internet connected phone or computer you use to broadcast events. This drastically reduces the risk of remote hacks, as private keys never touches the internet. It can be used in combination with multisig setups for extra protection. This setup is much less convenient and probably overkill for most but could be ideal for governments, companies, or other high profile accounts.
---
Nostr’s security model is not perfect but is robust and versatile. Ultimately users are in control and security is their responsibility. Apps will give users multiple options to choose from and users will choose what best fits their need.
-

@ da0b9bc3:4e30a4a9
2025-03-12 11:55:03
Hello Stackers!
Welcome on into the ~Music Corner of the Saloon!
A place where we Talk Music. Share Tracks. Zap Sats.
So stay a while and listen.
🚨Don't forget to check out the pinned items in the territory homepage! You can always find the latest weeklies there!🚨
🚨Subscribe to the territory to ensure you never miss a post! 🚨
originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/911193
-

@ 9dd283b1:cf9b6beb
2025-03-12 09:46:45
My Raspberry Pi 4 (running Umbrel) has been disconnecting approximately once a month, and my 1TB SSD now has only 80GB of space remaining. I'm considering an upgrade—possibly moving to a Pi 5 with a 2TB drive—but I'm open to any suggestions for a better setup within a similar budget. Any recommendations?
originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/911133