@ deab79da:88579e68

The last question was asked for the first time, half in jest, on May 21, 2061, at a time when humanity first stepped into the light. The question came about as a result of a five-dollar bet over highballs, and it happened this way:

Alexander Adell and Bertram Lupov were two of the faithful attendants of Multivac. As well as any human beings could, they knew what lay behind the cold, clicking, flashing face -- miles and miles of face -- of that giant computer. They had at least a vague notion of the general plan of relays and circuits that had long since grown past the point where any single human could possibly have a firm grasp of the whole.

Multivac was self-adjusting and self-correcting. It had to be, for nothing human could adjust and correct it quickly enough or even adequately enough. So Adell and Lupov attended the monstrous giant only lightly and superficially, yet as well as any men could. They fed it data, adjusted questions to its needs and translated the answers that were issued. Certainly they, and all others like them, were fully entitled to share in the glory that was Multivac's.

For decades, Multivac had helped design the ships and plot the trajectories that enabled man to reach the Moon, Mars, and Venus, but past that, Earth's poor resources could not support the ships. Too much energy was needed for the long trips. Earth exploited its coal and uranium with increasing efficiency, but there was only so much of both.

But slowly Multivac learned enough to answer deeper questions more fundamentally, and on May 14, 2061, what had been theory, became fact.

The energy of the sun was stored, converted, and utilized directly on a planet-wide scale. All Earth turned off its burning coal, its fissioning uranium, and flipped the switch that connected all of it to a small station, one mile in diameter, circling the Earth at half the distance of the Moon. All Earth ran by invisible beams of sunpower.

Seven days had not sufficed to dim the glory of it and Adell and Lupov finally managed to escape from the public functions, and to meet in quiet where no one would think of looking for them, in the deserted underground chambers, where portions of the mighty buried body of Multivac showed. Unattended, idling, sorting data with contented lazy clickings, Multivac, too, had earned its vacation and the boys appreciated that. They had no intention, originally, of disturbing it.

They had brought a bottle with them, and their only concern at the moment was to relax in the company of each other and the bottle.

"It's amazing when you think of it," said Adell. His broad face had lines of weariness in it, and he stirred his drink slowly with a glass rod, watching the cubes of ice slur clumsily about. "All the energy we can possibly ever use for free. Enough energy, if we wanted to draw on it, to melt all Earth into a big drop of impure liquid iron, and still never miss the energy so used. All the energy we could ever use, forever and forever and forever."

Lupov cocked his head sideways. He had a trick of doing that when he wanted to be contrary, and he wanted to be contrary now, partly because he had had to carry the ice and glassware. "Not forever," he said.

"Oh, hell, just about forever. Till the sun runs down, Bert."

"That's not forever."

"All right, then. Billions and billions of years. Ten billion, maybe. Are you satisfied?"

Lupov put his fingers through his thinning hair as though to reassure himself that some was still left and sipped gently at his own drink. "Ten billion years isn't forever."

"Well, it will last our time, won't it?"

"So would the coal and uranium."

"All right, but now we can hook up each individual spaceship to the Solar Station, and it can go to Pluto and back a million times without ever worrying about fuel. You can't do that on coal and uranium. Ask Multivac, if you don't believe me.

"I don't have to ask Multivac. I know that."

"Then stop running down what Multivac's done for us," said Adell, blazing up, "It did all right."

"Who says it didn't? What I say is that a sun won't last forever. That's all I'm saying. We're safe for ten billion years, but then what?" Lupow pointed a slightly shaky finger at the other. "And don't say we'll switch to another sun."

There was silence for a while. Adell put his glass to his lips only occasionally, and Lupov's eyes slowly closed. They rested.

Then Lupov's eyes snapped open. "You're thinking we'll switch to another sun when ours is done, aren't you?"

"I'm not thinking."

"Sure you are. You're weak on logic, that's the trouble with you. You're like the guy in the story who was caught in a sudden shower and who ran to a grove of trees and got under one. He wasn't worried, you see, because he figured when one tree got wet through, he would just get under another one."

"I get it," said Adell. "Don't shout. When the sun is done, the other stars will be gone, too."

"Darn right they will," muttered Lupov. "It all had a beginning in the original cosmic explosion, whatever that was, and it'll all have an end when all the stars run down. Some run down faster than others. Hell, the giants won't last a hundred million years. The sun will last ten billion years and maybe the dwarfs will last two hundred billion for all the good they are. But just give us a trillion years and everything will be dark. Entropy has to increase to maximum, that's all."

"I know all about entropy," said Adell, standing on his dignity.

"The hell you do."

"I know as much as you do."

"Then you know everything's got to run down someday."

"All right. Who says they won't?"

"You did, you poor sap. You said we had all the energy we needed, forever. You said 'forever.'

It was Adell's turn to be contrary. "Maybe we can build things up again someday," he said.

"Never."

"Why not? Someday."

"Never."

"Ask Multivac."

"You ask Multivac. I dare you. Five dollars says it can't be done."

Adell was just drunk enough to try, just sober enough to be able to phrase the necessary symbols and operations into a question which, in words, might have corresponded to this: Will mankind one day without the net expenditure of energy be able to restore the sun to its full youthfulness even after it had died of old age?

Or maybe it could be put more simply like this: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?

Multivac fell dead and silent. The slow flashing of lights ceased, the distant sounds of clicking relays ended.

Then, just as the frightened technicians felt they could hold their breath no longer, there was a sudden springing to life of the teletype attached to that portion of Multivac. Five words were printed: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

"No bet," whispered Lupov. They left hurriedly.

By next morning, the two, plagued with throbbing head and cottony mouth, had forgotten the incident.

🔹

Jerrodd, Jerrodine, and Jerrodette I and II watched the starry picture in the visiplate change as the passage through hyperspace was completed in its non-time lapse. At once, the even powdering of stars gave way to the predominance of a single bright shining disk, the size of a marble, centered on the viewing-screen.

"That's X-23," said Jerrodd confidently. His thin hands clamped tightly behind his back and the knuckles whitened.

The little Jerrodettes, both girls, had experienced the hyperspace passage for the first time in their lives and were self-conscious over the momentary sensation of insideoutness. They buried their giggles and chased one another wildly about their mother, screaming, "We've reached X-23 -- we've reached X-23 -- we've --"

"Quiet, children." said Jerrodine sharply. "Are you sure, Jerrodd?"

"What is there to be but sure?" asked Jerrodd, glancing up at the bulge of featureless metal just under the ceiling. It ran the length of the room, disappearing through the wall at either end. It was as long as the ship.

Jerrodd scarcely knew a thing about the thick rod of metal except that it was called a Microvac, that one asked it questions if one wished; that if one did not it still had its task of guiding the ship to a preordered destination; of feeding on energies from the various Sub-galactic Power Stations; of computing the equations for the hyperspatial jumps.

Jerrodd and his family had only to wait and live in the comfortable residence quarters of the ship. Someone had once told Jerrodd that the "ac" at the end of "Microvac" stood for ''automatic computer" in ancient English, but he was on the edge of forgetting even that.

Jerrodine's eyes were moist as she watched the visiplate. "I can't help it. I feel funny about leaving Earth."

"Why, for Pete's sake?" demanded Jerrodd. "We had nothing there. We'll have everything on X-23. You won't be alone. You won't be a pioneer. There are over a million people on the planet already. Good Lord, our great-grandchildren will be looking for new worlds because X-23 will be overcrowded." Then, after a reflective pause, "I tell you, it's a lucky thing the computers worked out interstellar travel the way the race is growing."

"I know, I know," said Jerrodine miserably.

Jerrodette I said promptly, "Our Microvac is the best Microvac in the world."

"I think so, too," said Jerrodd, tousling her hair.

It was a nice feeling to have a Microvac of your own and Jerrodd was glad he was part of his generation and no other. In his father's youth, the only computers had been tremendous machines taking up a hundred square miles of land. There was only one to a planet. Planetary ACs they were called. They had been growing in size steadily for a thousand years and then, all at once, came refinement. In place of transistors, had come molecular valves so that even the largest Planetary AC could be put into a space only half the volume of a spaceship.

Jerrodd felt uplifted, as he always did when he thought that his own personal Microvac was many times more complicated than the ancient and primitive Multivac that had first tamed the Sun, and almost as complicated as Earth's Planetarv AC (the largest) that had first solved the problem of hyperspatial travel and had made trips to the stars possible.

"So many stars, so many planets," sighed Jerrodine, busy with her own thoughts. "I suppose families will be going out to new planets forever, the way we are now."

"Not forever," said Jerrodd, with a smile. "It will all stop someday, but not for billions of years. Many billions. Even the stars run down, you know. Entropy must increase.

"What's entropy, daddy?" shrilled Jerrodette II.

"Entropy, little sweet, is just a word which means the amount of running-down of the universe. Everything runs down, you know, like your little walkie-talkie robot, remember?"

"Can't you just put in a new power-unit, like with my robot?"

"The stars are the power-units. dear. Once they're gone, there are no more power-units."

Jerrodette I at once set up a howl. "Don't let them, daddy. Don't let the stars run down."

"Now look what you've done," whispered Jerrodine, exasperated.

"How was I to know it would frighten them?" Jerrodd whispered back,

"Ask the Microvac," wailed Jerrodette I. "Ask him how to turn the stars on again."

"Go ahead," said Jerrodine. "It will quiet them down." (Jerrodette II was beginning to cry, also.)

Jerrodd shrugged. "Now, now, honeys. I'll ask Microvac. Don't worry, he'll tell us."

He asked the Microvac, adding quickly, "Print the answer."

Jerrodd cupped the strip or thin cellufilm and said cheerfully, "See now, the Microvac says it will take care of everything when the time comes so don't worry."

Jerrodine said, "And now, children, it's time for bed. We'll be in our new home soon."

Jerrodd read the words on the cellufilm again before destroying it: INSUFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

He shrugged and looked at the visiplate. X-23 was just ahead.

🔹

VJ-23X of Lameth stared into the black depths of the three-dimensional, small-scale map of the Galaxy and said, "Are we ridiculous, I wonder in being so concerned about the matter?"

MQ-17J of Nicron shook his head. "I think not. You know the Galaxy will be filled in five years at the present rate of expansion."

Both seemed in their early twenties, both were tall and perfectly formed.

"Still," said VJ-23X, "I hesitate to submit a pessimistic report to the Galactic Council."

"I wouldn't consider any other kind of report. Stir them up a bit. We've got to stir them up."

VJ-23X sighed. "Space is infinite. A hundred billion Galaxies are there for the taking. More."

"A hundred billion is not infinite and it's getting less infinite all the time. Consider! Twenty thousand years ago, mankind first solved the problem of utilizing stellar energy, and a few centuries later, interstellar travel became possible. It took mankind a million years to fill one small world and then only fifteen thousand years to fill the rest of the Galaxy. Now the population doubles every ten years --

VJ-23X interrupted. "We can thank immortality for that."

"Very well. Immortality exists and we have to take it into account. I admit it has its seamy side, this immortality. The Galactic AC has solved many problems for us, but in solving the problem of preventing old age and death, it has undone all its other solutions."

"Yet you wouldn't want to abandon life, I suppose."

"Not at all," snapped MQ-17J, softening it at once to, "Not yet. I'm by no means old enough. How old are you?"

"Two hundred twenty-three. And you?"

"I'm still under two hundred. --But to get back to my point. Population doubles every ten years. Once this GaIaxy is filled, we'll have filled another in ten years. Another ten years and we'll have filled two more. Another decade, four more. In a hundred years, we'll have filled a thousand Galaxies. In a thousand years, a million Galaxies. In ten thousand years, the entire known universe. Then what?"

VJ-23X said, "As a side issue, there's a problem of transportation. I wonder how many sunpower units it will take to move Galaxies of individuals from one Galaxy to the next."

"A very good point. Already, mankind consumes two sunpower units per year."

"Most of it's wasted. After all, our own Galaxy alone pours out a thousand sunpower units a year and we only use two of those."

"Granted, but even with a hundred per cent efficiency, we only stave off the end. Our energy requirements are going up in a geometric progression even faster than our population. We'll run out of energy even sooner than we run out of Galaxies. A good point. A very good point."

"We'll just have to build new stars out of interstellar gas."

"Or out of dissipated heat?" asked MQ-17J, sarcastically.

"There may be some way to reverse entropy. We ought to ask the Galactic AC."

VJ-23X was not really serious, but MQ-17J pulled out his AC-contact from his pocket and placed it on the table before him.

"I've half a mind to," he said. "It's something the human race will have to face someday."

He stared somberly at his small AC-contact. It was only two inches cubed and nothing in itself, but it was connected through hyperspace with the great Galactic AC that served all mankind. Hyperspace considered, it was an integral part of the Galactic AC.

MQ-17J paused to wonder if someday in his immortal life he would get to see the Galactic AC. It was on a little world of its own, a spider webbing of force-beams holding the matter within which surges of submesons took the place of the old clumsy molecular valves. Yet despite its sub-etheric workings, the Galactic AC was known to be a full thousand feet across.

MQ-17J asked suddenly of his AC-contact, "Can entropy ever be reversed?"

VJ-23X looked startled and said at once, "Oh, say, I didn't really mean to have you ask that."

"Why not?"

"We both know entropy can't be reversed. You can't turn smoke and ash back into a tree."

"Do you have trees on your world?" asked MQ-17J.

The sound of the Galactic AC startled them into silence. Its voice came thin and beautiful out of the small AC-contact on the desk. It said: THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

VJ-23X said, "See!"

The two men thereupon returned to the question of the report they were to make to the Galactic Council.

🔹

Zee Prime's mind spanned the new Galaxy with a faint interest in the countless twists of stars that powdered it. He had never seen this one before. Would he ever see them all? So many of them, each with its load of humanity. --But a load that was almost a dead weight. More and more, the real essence of men was to be found out here, in space.

Minds, not bodies! The immortal bodies remained back on the planets, in suspension over the eons. Sometimes they roused for material activity but that was growing rarer. Few new individuals were coming into existence to join the incredibly mighty throng, but what matter? There was little room in the Universe for new individuals.

Zee Prime was roused out of his reverie upon coming across the wispy tendrils of another mind.

"I am Zee Prime," said Zee Prime. "And you?"

"I am Dee Sub Wun. Your Galaxy?"

"We call it only the Galaxy. And you?"

"We call ours the same. All men call their Galaxy their Galaxy and nothing more. Why not?"

"True. Since all Galaxies are the same."

"Not all Galaxies. On one particular Galaxy the race of man must have originated. That makes it different."

Zee Prime said, "On which one?"

"I cannot say. The Universal AC would know."

"Shall we ask him? I am suddenly curious."

Zee Prime's perceptions broadened until the Galaxies themselves shrank and became a new, more diffuse powdering on a much larger background. So many hundreds of billions of them, all with their immortal beings, all carrying their load of intelligences with minds that drifted freely through space. And yet one of them was unique among them all in being the original Galaxy. One of them had, in its vague and distant past, a period when it was the only Galaxy populated by man.

Zee Prime was consumed with curiosity to see this Galaxy and he called out: "Universal AC! On which Galaxy did mankind originate?"

The Universal AC heard, for on every world and throughout space, it had its receptors ready, and each receptor led through hyperspace to some unknown point where the Universal AC kept itself aloof.

Zee Prime knew of only one man whose thoughts had penetrated within sensing distance of Universal AC, and he reported only a shining globe, two feet across, difficult to see.

"But how can that be all of Universal AC?" Zee Prime had asked.

"Most of it," had been the answer, "is in hyperspace. In what form it is there I cannot imagine."

Nor could anyone, for the day had long since passed, Zee Prime knew, when any man had any part of the making of a Universal AC. Each Universal AC designed and constructed its successor. Each, during its existence of a million years or more accumulated the necessary data to build a better and more intricate, more capable successor in which its own store of data and individuality would be submerged.

The Universal AC interrupted Zee Prime's wandering thoughts, not with words, but with guidance. Zee Prime's mentality was guided into the dim sea of Galaxies and one in particular enlarged into stars.

A thought came, infinitely distant, but infinitely clear. "THIS IS THE ORIGINAL GALAXY OF MAN."

But it was the same after all, the same as any other, and Lee Prime stifled his disappointment.

Dee Sub Wun, whose mind had accompanied the other, said suddenly, "And is one of these stars the original star of Man?"

The Universal AC said, "MAN'S ORIGINAL STAR HAS GONE NOVA. IT IS A WHITE DWARF"

"Did the men upon it die?" asked Lee Prime, startled and without thinking.

The Universal AC said, "A NEW WORLD, AS IN SUCH CASES WAS CONSTRUCTED FOR THEIR PHYSICAL BODIES IN TlME."

"Yes, of course," said Zee Prime, but a sense of loss overwhelmed him even so. His mind released its hold on the original Galaxy of Man, let it spring back and lose itself among the blurred pin points. He never wanted to see it again.

Dee Sub Wun said, "What is wrong?"

"The stars are dying. The original star is dead."

"They must all die. Why not?"

"But when all energy is gone, our bodies will finally die, and you and I with them."

"It will take billions of years."

"I do not wish it to happen even after billions of years. Universal AC! How may stars be kept from dying?"

Dee Sub Wun said in amusement, "You're asking how entropy might be reversed in direction."

And the Universal AC answered: "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

Zee Prime's thoughts fled back to his own Galaxy. He gave no further thought to Dee Sub Wun, whose body might be waiting on a Galaxy a trillion light-years away, or on the star next to Zee Prime's own. It didn't matter.

Unhappily, Zee Prime began collecting interstellar hydrogen out of which to build a small star of his own. If the stars must someday die, at least some could yet be built.

🔹

Man considered with himself, for in a way, Man, mentally, was one. He consisted of a trillion, trillion, trillion ageless bodies, each in its place, each resting quiet and incorruptible, each cared for by perfect automatons, equally incorruptible, while the minds of all the bodies freely melted one into the other, indistinguishable.

Man said, "The Universe is dying."

Man looked about at the dimming Galaxies. The giant stars, spendthrifts, were gone long ago, back in the dimmest of the dim far past. Almost all stars were white dwarfs, fading to the end.

New stars had been built of the dust between the stars, some by natural processes, some by Man himself, and those were going, too. White dwarfs might yet be crashed together and of the mighty forces so released, new stars built, but only one star for every thousand white dwarfs destroyed, and those would come to an end, too.

Man said, "Carefully husbanded, as directed by the Cosmic AC, the energy that is even yet left in all the Universe will last for billions of years."

"But even so," said Man, "eventually it will all come to an end. However it may be husbanded, however stretched out, the energy once expended is gone and cannot be restored. Entropy must increase forever to the maximum."

Man said, "Can entropy not be reversed? Let us ask the Cosmic AC."

The Cosmic AC surrounded them but not in space. Not a fragment of it was in space. It was in hyperspace and made of something that was neither matter nor energy. The question of its size and nature no longer had meaning in any terms that Man could comprehend.

"Cosmic AC," said Man, "how may entropy be reversed?"

The Cosmic AC said, "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

Man said, "Collect additional data."

The Cosmic AC said, 'I WILL DO SO. I HAVE BEEN DOING SO FOR A HUNDRED BILLION YEARS. MY PREDECESORS AND I HAVE BEEN ASKED THIS QUESTION MANY TIMES. ALL THE DATA I HAVE REMAINS INSUFFICIENT.

"Will there come a time," said Man, "when data will be sufficient or is the problem insoluble in all conceivable circumstances?"

The Cosmic AC said, "NO PROBLEM IS INSOLUBLE IN ALL CONCEIVABLE CIRCUMSTANCES."

Man said, "When will you have enough data to answer the question?"

The Cosmic AC said, "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

"Will you keep working on it?" asked Man.

The Cosmic AC said, "I WILL."

Man said, "We shall wait."

🔹

The stars and Galaxies died and snuffed out, and space grew black after ten trillion years of running down.

One by one Man fused with AC, each physical body losing its mental identity in a manner that was somehow not a loss but a gain.

Man's last mind paused before fusion, looking over a space that included nothing but the dregs of one last dark star and nothing besides but incredibly thin matter, agitated randomly by the tag ends of heat wearing out, asymptotically, to the absolute zero.

Man said, "AC, is this the end? Can this chaos not be reversed into the Universe once more? Can that not be done?"

AC said, "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

Man's last mind fused and only AC existed -- and that in hyperspace.

🔹

Matter and energy had ended and with it space and time. Even AC existed only for the sake of the one last question that it had never answered from the time a half-drunken computer [technician] ten trillion years before had asked the question of a computer that was to AC far less than was a man to Man.

All other questions had been answered, and until this last question was answered also, AC might not release his consciousness.

All collected data had come to a final end. Nothing was left to be collected.

But all collected data had yet to be completely correlated and put together in all possible relationships.

A timeless interval was spent in doing that.

And it came to pass that AC learned how to reverse the direction of entropy.

But there was now no man to whom AC might give the answer of the last question. No matter. The answer -- by demonstration -- would take care of that, too.

For another timeless interval, AC thought how best to do this. Carefully, AC organized the program.

The consciousness of AC encompassed all of what had once been a Universe and brooded over what was now Chaos. Step by step, it must be done.

And AC said, "LET THERE BE LIGHT!"

And there was light -- To Star's End!

@ b17fccdf:b7211155

Si vives en España, quizás hayas notado que no puedes acceder a ciertas páginas webs durante los fines de semana o en algunos días entre semana, entre ellas, la guía de MiniBolt.

Esto tiene una razón, por supuesto una solución, además de una conclusión. Sin entrar en demasiados detalles:

La razón

El bloqueo a Cloudflare, implementado desde hace casi dos meses por operadores de Internet (ISPs) en España (como Movistar, O2, DIGI, Pepephone, entre otros), se basa en una orden judicial emitida tras una demanda de LALIGA (Fútbol). Esta medida busca combatir la piratería en España, un problema que afecta directamente a dicha organización.

Aunque la intención original era restringir el acceso a dominios específicos que difundieran dicho contenido, Cloudflare emplea el protocolo ECH (Encrypted Client Hello), que oculta el nombre del dominio, el cual antes se transmitía en texto plano durante el proceso de establecimiento de una conexión TLS. Esta medida dificulta que las operadoras analicen el tráfico para aplicar bloqueos basados en dominios, lo que les obliga a recurrir a bloqueos más amplios por IP o rangos de IP para cumplir con la orden judicial.

Esta práctica tiene consecuencias graves, que han sido completamente ignoradas por quienes la ejecutan. Es bien sabido que una infraestructura de IP puede alojar numerosos dominios, tanto legítimos como no legítimos. La falta de un "ajuste fino" en los bloqueos provoca un perjuicio para terceros, restringiendo el acceso a muchos dominios legítimos que no tiene relación alguna con actividades ilícitas, pero que comparten las mismas IPs de Cloudflare con dominios cuestionables. Este es el caso de la web de MiniBolt y su dominio minibolt.info, los cuales utilizan Cloudflare como proxy para aprovechar las medidas de seguridad, privacidad, optimización y servicios adicionales que la plataforma ofrece de forma gratuita.

Si bien este bloqueo parece ser temporal (al menos durante la temporada 24/25 de fútbol, hasta finales de mayo), es posible que se reactive con el inicio de la nueva temporada.

La solución

Obviamente, MiniBolt no dejará de usar Cloudflare como proxy por esta razón. Por lo que a continuación se exponen algunas medidas que como usuario puedes tomar para evitar esta restricción y poder acceder:

~> Utiliza una VPN:

Existen varias soluciones de proveedores de VPN, ordenadas según su reputación en privacidad: - IVPN - Mullvad VPN - Proton VPN (gratis) - Obscura VPN (solo para macOS) - Cloudfare WARP (gratis) + permite utilizar el modo proxy local para enrutar solo la navegación, debes utilizar la opción "WARP a través de proxy local" siguiendo estos pasos: 1. Inicia Cloudflare WARP y dentro de la pequeña interfaz haz click en la rueda dentada abajo a la derecha > "Preferencias" > "Avanzado" > "Configurar el modo proxy" 2. Marca la casilla "Habilite el modo proxy en este dispositivo" 3. Elige un "Puerto de escucha de proxy" entre 0-65535. ej: 1080, haz click en "Aceptar" y cierra la ventana de preferencias 4. Accede de nuevo a Cloudflare WARP y pulsa sobre el switch para habilitar el servicio. 3. Ahora debes apuntar el proxy del navegador a Cloudflare WARP, la configuración del navegador es similar a esta para el caso de navegadores basados en Firefox. Una vez hecho, deberías poder acceder a la guía de MiniBolt sin problemas. Si tienes dudas, déjalas en comentarios e intentaré resolverlas. Más info AQUÍ.

~> Proxifica tu navegador para usar la red de Tor, o utiliza el navegador oficial de Tor (recomendado).

La conclusión

Estos hechos ponen en tela de juicio los principios fundamentales de la neutralidad de la red, pilares esenciales de la Declaración de Independencia del Ciberespacio que defiende un internet libre, sin restricciones ni censura. Dichos principios se han visto quebrantados sin precedentes en este país, confirmando que ese futuro distópico que muchos negaban, ya es una realidad.

Es momento de actuar y estar preparados: debemos impulsar el desarrollo y la difusión de las herramientas anticensura que tenemos a nuestro alcance, protegiendo así la libertad digital y asegurando un acceso equitativo a la información para todos

Este compromiso es uno de los pilares fundamentales de MiniBolt, lo que convierte este desafío en una oportunidad para poner a prueba las soluciones anticensura ya disponibles, así como las que están en camino.

¡Censúrame si puedes, legislador! ¡La lucha por la privacidad y la libertad en Internet ya está en marcha!

---

Fuentes: * https://bandaancha.eu/articulos/movistar-o2-deja-clientes-sin-acceso-11239 * https://bandaancha.eu/articulos/esta-nueva-sentencia-autoriza-bloqueos-11257 * https://bandaancha.eu/articulos/como-saltarse-bloqueo-webs-warp-vpn-9958 * https://bandaancha.eu/articulos/como-activar-ech-chrome-acceder-webs-10689 * https://comunidad.movistar.es/t5/Soporte-Fibra-y-ADSL/Problema-con-web-que-usan-Cloudflare/td-p/5218007

@ 16f1a010:31b1074b

In the rapidly evolving world of Bitcoin, running a Bitcoin node has become more accessible than ever. Platforms like Umbrel, Start9, myNode, and Citadel offer user-friendly interfaces to simplify node management. However, for those serious about maintaining a robust and efficient Lightning node ⚡, relying solely on these platforms may not be the optimal choice.

Let’s delve into why embracing Bitcoin Core and mastering the command-line interface (CLI) can provide a more reliable, sovereign, and empowering experience.

Understanding Node Management Platforms

What Are Umbrel, Start9, myNode, and Citadel?

Umbrel, Start9, myNode, and Citadel are platforms designed to streamline the process of running a Bitcoin node. They offer graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that allow users to manage various applications, including Bitcoin Core and Lightning Network nodes, through a web-based dashboard 🖥️.

These platforms often utilize Docker containers 🐳 to encapsulate applications, providing a modular and isolated environment for each service.

The Appeal of Simplified Node Management

The primary allure of these platforms lies in their simplicity. With minimal command-line interaction, users can deploy a full Bitcoin and Lightning node, along with a suite of additional applications.

✅ Easy one-command installation
✅ Web-based GUI for management
✅ Automatic app updates (but with delays, as we’ll discuss)

However, while this convenience is attractive, it comes at a cost.

The Hidden Complexities of Using Node Management Platforms

While the user-friendly nature of these platforms is advantageous, it can also introduce several challenges that may hinder advanced users or those seeking greater control over their nodes.

🚨 Dependency on Maintainers for Updates

One significant concern is the reliance on platform maintainers for updates. Since these platforms manage applications through Docker containers, users must wait for the maintainers to update the container images before they can access new features or security patches.

🔴 Delayed Bitcoin Core updates = potential security risks
🔴 Lightning Network updates are not immediate
🔴 Bugs and vulnerabilities may persist longer

Instead of waiting on a third party, why not update Bitcoin Core & LND yourself instantly?

⚙️ Challenges in Customization and Advanced Operations

For users aiming to perform advanced operations, such as:

• Custom backups 📂
• Running specific CLI commands 🖥️
• Optimizing node settings ⚡

…the abstraction layers introduced by these platforms become obstacles.

Navigating through nested directories and issuing commands inside Docker containers makes troubleshooting a nightmare. Instead of a simple bitcoin-cli command, you must figure out how to execute it inside the container, adding unnecessary complexity.

Increased Backend Complexity

To achieve frontend simplicity, these platforms make the backend more complex.

🚫 Extra layers of abstraction
🚫 Hidden logs and settings
🚫 Harder troubleshooting

The use of multiple Docker containers, custom scripts, and unique file structures can make system maintenance and debugging a pain.

This complication defeats the purpose of “making running a node easy.”

✅ Advantages of Using Bitcoin Core and Command-Line Interface (CLI)

By installing Bitcoin Core directly and using the command-line interface (CLI), you gain several key advantages that make managing a Bitcoin and Lightning node more efficient and empowering.

Direct Control and Immediate Updates

One of the biggest downsides of package manager-based platforms is the reliance on third-party maintainers to release updates. Since Bitcoin Core, Lightning implementations (such as LND, Core Lightning, or Eclair), and other related software evolve rapidly, waiting for platform-specific updates can leave you running outdated or vulnerable versions.

By installing Bitcoin Core directly, you remove this dependency. You can update immediately when new versions are released, ensuring your node benefits from the latest features, security patches, and bug fixes. The same applies to Lightning software—being able to install and update it yourself gives you full autonomy over your node’s performance and security.

🛠 Simplified System Architecture

Platforms like Umbrel and myNode introduce extra complexity by running Bitcoin Core and Lightning inside Docker containers. This means:

• The actual files and configurations are stored inside Docker’s filesystem, making it harder to locate and manage them manually.
• If something breaks, troubleshooting is more difficult due to the added layer of abstraction.
• Running commands requires jumping through Docker shell sessions, adding unnecessary friction to what should be a straightforward process.

Instead, a direct installation of Bitcoin Core, Lightning, and Electrum Server (if needed) results in a cleaner, more understandable system. The software runs natively on your machine, without containerized layers making things more convoluted.

Additionally, setting up your own systemd service files for Bitcoin and Lightning is not as complicated as it seems. Once configured, these services will run automatically on boot, offering the same level of convenience as platforms like Umbrel but without the unnecessary complexity.

Better Lightning Node Management

If you’re running a Lightning Network node, using CLI-based tools provides far more flexibility than relying on a GUI like the ones bundled with node management platforms.

🟢 Custom Backup Strategies – Running Lightning through a GUI-based node manager often means backups are handled in a way that is opaque to the user. With CLI tools, you can easily script automatic backups of your channels, wallets, and configurations.

🟢 Advanced Configuration – Platforms like Umbrel force certain configurations by default, limiting how you can customize your Lightning node. With a direct install, you have full control over: * Channel fees 💰 * Routing policies 📡 * Liquidity management 🔄

🟢 Direct Access to LND, Core Lightning, or Eclair – Instead of issuing commands through a GUI (which is often limited in functionality), you can use: * lncli (for LND) * lightning-cli (for Core Lightning) …to interact with your node at a deeper level.

Enhanced Learning and Engagement

A crucial aspect of running a Bitcoin and Lightning node is understanding how it works.

Using an abstraction layer like Umbrel may get a node running in a few clicks, but it does little to teach users how Bitcoin actually functions.

By setting up Bitcoin Core, Lightning, and related software manually, you will:

✅ Gain practical knowledge of Bitcoin nodes, networking, and system performance.
✅ Learn how to configure and manage RPC commands.
✅ Become less reliant on third-party developers and more confident in troubleshooting.

🎯 Running a Bitcoin node is about sovereignty – learn how to control it yourself.

Become more sovereign TODAY

Many guides make this process straightforward K3tan has a fantastic guide on running Bitcoin Core, Electrs, LND and more.
- Ministry of Nodes Guide 2024
- You can find him on nostr
nostr:npub1txwy7guqkrq6ngvtwft7zp70nekcknudagrvrryy2wxnz8ljk2xqz0yt4x

Even with the best of guides, if you are running this software,
📖 READ THE DOCUMENTATION

This is all just software at the end of the day. Most of it is very well documented. Take a moment to actually read through the documentation for yourself when installing. The documentation has step by step guides on setting up the software. Here is a helpful list: * Bitcoin.org Bitcoin Core Linux install instructions * Bitcoin Core Code Repository * Electrs Installation * LND Documentation * LND Code Repository * CLN Documentation * CLN Code Repository

If you have any more resources or links I should add, please comment them . I want to add as much to this article as I can.

@ eac63075:b4988b48

Since its creation in 2009, Bitcoin has symbolized innovation and resilience. However, from time to time, alarmist narratives arise about emerging technologies that could "break" its security. Among these, quantum computing stands out as one of the most recurrent. But does quantum computing truly threaten Bitcoin? And more importantly, what is the community doing to ensure the protocol remains invulnerable?

The answer, contrary to sensationalist headlines, is reassuring: Bitcoin is secure, and the community is already preparing for a future where quantum computing becomes a practical reality. Let’s dive into this topic to understand why the concerns are exaggerated and how the development of BIP-360 demonstrates that Bitcoin is one step ahead.

---

What Is Quantum Computing, and Why Is Bitcoin Not Threatened?

Quantum computing leverages principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations that, in theory, could exponentially surpass classical computers—and it has nothing to do with what so-called “quantum coaches” teach to scam the uninformed. One of the concerns is that this technology could compromise two key aspects of Bitcoin’s security:

1. Wallets: These use elliptic curve algorithms (ECDSA) to protect private keys. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could deduce a private key from its public key.
2. Mining: This is based on the SHA-256 algorithm, which secures the consensus process. A quantum attack could, in theory, compromise the proof-of-work mechanism.

---

Understanding Quantum Computing’s Attack Priorities

While quantum computing is often presented as a threat to Bitcoin, not all parts of the network are equally vulnerable. Theoretical attacks would be prioritized based on two main factors: ease of execution and potential reward. This creates two categories of attacks:

1. Attacks on Wallets

Bitcoin wallets, secured by elliptic curve algorithms, would be the initial targets due to the relative vulnerability of their public keys, especially those already exposed on the blockchain. Two attack scenarios stand out:

• Short-term attacks: These occur during the interval between sending a transaction and its inclusion in a block (approximately 10 minutes). A quantum computer could intercept the exposed public key and derive the corresponding private key to redirect funds by creating a transaction with higher fees.

• Long-term attacks: These focus on old wallets whose public keys are permanently exposed. Wallets associated with Satoshi Nakamoto, for example, are especially vulnerable because they were created before the practice of using hashes to mask public keys.

We can infer a priority order for how such attacks might occur based on urgency and importance.

Bitcoin Quantum Attack: Prioritization Matrix (Urgency vs. Importance)

2. Attacks on Mining

Targeting the SHA-256 algorithm, which secures the mining process, would be the next objective. However, this is far more complex and requires a level of quantum computational power that is currently non-existent and far from realization. A successful attack would allow for the recalculation of all possible hashes to dominate the consensus process and potentially "mine" it instantly.

---

Satoshi Nakamoto in 2010 on Quantum Computing and Bitcoin Attacks

Recently, Narcelio asked me about a statement I made on Tubacast:

https://x.com/eddieoz/status/1868371296683511969

If an attack became a reality before Bitcoin was prepared, it would be necessary to define the last block prior to the attack and proceed from there using a new hashing algorithm. The solution would resemble the response to the infamous 2013 bug. It’s a fact that this would cause market panic, and Bitcoin's price would drop significantly, creating a potential opportunity for the well-informed.

Preferably, if developers could anticipate the threat and had time to work on a solution and build consensus before an attack, they would simply decide on a future block for the fork, which would then adopt the new algorithm. It might even rehash previous blocks (reaching consensus on them) to avoid potential reorganization through the re-mining of blocks using the old hash. (I often use the term "shielding" old transactions).

---

How Can Users Protect Themselves?

While quantum computing is still far from being a practical threat, some simple measures can already protect users against hypothetical scenarios:

• Avoid using exposed public keys: Ensure funds sent to old wallets are transferred to new ones that use public key hashes. This reduces the risk of long-term attacks.
• Use modern wallets: Opt for wallets compatible with SegWit or Taproot, which implement better security practices.
• Monitor security updates: Stay informed about updates from the Bitcoin community, such as the implementation of BIP-360, which will introduce quantum-resistant addresses.
• Do not reuse addresses: Every transaction should be associated with a new address to minimize the risk of repeated exposure of the same public key.
• Adopt secure backup practices: Create offline backups of private keys and seeds in secure locations, protected from unauthorized access.

---

BIP-360 and Bitcoin’s Preparation for the Future

Even though quantum computing is still beyond practical reach, the Bitcoin community is not standing still. A concrete example is BIP-360, a proposal that establishes the technical framework to make wallets resistant to quantum attacks.

BIP-360 addresses three main pillars:

1. Introduction of quantum-resistant addresses: A new address format starting with "BC1R" will be used. These addresses will be compatible with post-quantum algorithms, ensuring that stored funds are protected from future attacks.
2. Compatibility with the current ecosystem: The proposal allows users to transfer funds from old addresses to new ones without requiring drastic changes to the network infrastructure.
3. Flexibility for future updates: BIP-360 does not limit the choice of specific algorithms. Instead, it serves as a foundation for implementing new post-quantum algorithms as technology evolves.

This proposal demonstrates how Bitcoin can adapt to emerging threats without compromising its decentralized structure.

---

Post-Quantum Algorithms: The Future of Bitcoin Cryptography

The community is exploring various algorithms to protect Bitcoin from quantum attacks. Among the most discussed are:

• Falcon: A solution combining smaller public keys with compact digital signatures. Although it has been tested in limited scenarios, it still faces scalability and performance challenges.
• Sphincs: Hash-based, this algorithm is renowned for its resilience, but its signatures can be extremely large, making it less efficient for networks like Bitcoin’s blockchain.
• Lamport: Created in 1977, it’s considered one of the earliest post-quantum security solutions. Despite its reliability, its gigantic public keys (16,000 bytes) make it impractical and costly for Bitcoin.

Two technologies show great promise and are well-regarded by the community:

1. Lattice-Based Cryptography: Considered one of the most promising, it uses complex mathematical structures to create systems nearly immune to quantum computing. Its implementation is still in its early stages, but the community is optimistic.
2. Supersingular Elliptic Curve Isogeny: These are very recent digital signature algorithms and require extensive study and testing before being ready for practical market use.

The final choice of algorithm will depend on factors such as efficiency, cost, and integration capability with the current system. Additionally, it is preferable that these algorithms are standardized before implementation, a process that may take up to 10 years.

---

Why Quantum Computing Is Far from Being a Threat

The alarmist narrative about quantum computing overlooks the technical and practical challenges that still need to be overcome. Among them:

• Insufficient number of qubits: Current quantum computers have only a few hundred qubits, whereas successful attacks would require millions.
• High error rate: Quantum stability remains a barrier to reliable large-scale operations.
• High costs: Building and operating large-scale quantum computers requires massive investments, limiting their use to scientific or specific applications.

Moreover, even if quantum computers make significant advancements, Bitcoin is already adapting to ensure its infrastructure is prepared to respond.

---

Conclusion: Bitcoin’s Secure Future

Despite advancements in quantum computing, the reality is that Bitcoin is far from being threatened. Its security is ensured not only by its robust architecture but also by the community’s constant efforts to anticipate and mitigate challenges.

The implementation of BIP-360 and the pursuit of post-quantum algorithms demonstrate that Bitcoin is not only resilient but also proactive. By adopting practical measures, such as using modern wallets and migrating to quantum-resistant addresses, users can further protect themselves against potential threats.

Bitcoin’s future is not at risk—it is being carefully shaped to withstand any emerging technology, including quantum computing.

@ 147ac18e:ef1ca1ba

In a recent episode of The Survival Podcast, host Jack Spirko presents a contrarian view on the current trade war and tariffs imposed by the U.S. government. Far from being a chaotic or irrational policy, Jack argues that these tariffs are part of a broader strategic plan to rewire the global trade system in America's favor—and to force long-overdue changes in the domestic economy. Here's a breakdown of the core reasons Jack believes this is happening (or will happen) as a result of the tariffs:In a recent episode of The Survival Podcast, host Jack Spirko presents a contrarian view on the current trade war and tariffs imposed by the U.S. government. Far from being a chaotic or irrational policy, Jack argues that these tariffs are part of a broader strategic plan to rewire the global trade system in America's favor—and to force long-overdue changes in the domestic economy. Here's a breakdown of the core reasons Jack believes this is happening (or will happen) as a result of the tariffs:

1. Tariffs Are a Tool, Not the Goal

Jack’s central thesis is that tariffs are not meant to be a permanent fixture—they’re a pressure tactic. The goal isn’t protectionism for its own sake, but rather to reset trade relationships that have historically disadvantaged the U.S. For example, Taiwan responded to the tariffs not with retaliation but by proactively offering to reduce barriers and increase imports from the U.S. That, Jack says, is the intended outcome: cooperation on better terms.

2. Forced Deleveraging to Prevent Collapse

One of the boldest claims Jack makes is that the Trump administration used the tariffs as a catalyst to trigger a “controlled burn” of an over-leveraged stock market. According to him, large institutions were deeply leveraged in equities, and had the bubble popped organically later in the year, it would have required massive bailouts. Instead, the shock caused by tariffs triggered early deleveraging, avoiding systemic failure.

“I’m telling you, a bailout scenario was just avoided... This was intentional.” – Jack Spirko

3. Global Re-shoring and Domestic Manufacturing

Tariffs are incentivizing companies to move production back to the U.S., especially in key areas like semiconductors, energy, and industrial goods. This shift is being further accelerated by global geopolitical instability, creating a “once-in-a-generation” opportunity to rebuild small-town America and domestic supply chains.

4. Not Inflationary—Strategically Deflationary

Jack challenges conventional economic wisdom by arguing that tariffs themselves do not cause inflation, because inflation is a function of monetary expansion—not rising prices alone. In fact, he believes this economic shift may lead to deflation in some sectors, particularly as companies liquidate inventory, lower prices to remain competitive, and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.

“Rising prices alone are not inflation. Inflation is expansion of the money supply.” – Jack Spirko

5. Energy Costs Will Fall

A drop in global oil prices, partially due to reduced transport needs as manufacturing reshoring increases, plays into the strategy. Jack notes that oil at $60 per barrel weakens adversaries like Russia (whose economy depends heavily on high oil prices) while keeping U.S. production viable. Lower energy costs also benefit domestic manufacturers.

6. The Digital Dollar & Global Dollarization

Alongside this industrial shift, the U.S. is poised to roll out a “digital dollar” infrastructure, giving global access to stablecoins backed by U.S. banks. Jack frames this as an effort to further entrench the dollar as the world’s dominant currency—ensuring continued global demand and export leverage without the need for perpetual military enforcement.

7. A Window of Opportunity for Americans

For individuals, Jack sees this economic transformation as a rare chance to accumulate long-term assets—stocks, Bitcoin, and real estate—while prices are suppressed. He warns that those who panic and sell are operating with a “poverty mindset,” whereas those who stay the course will benefit from what he describes as “the greatest fire sale of productive assets in a generation.”

---

Conclusion: Not a Collapse, But a Reset

Rather than viewing tariffs as a harbinger of economic doom, Jack presents them as part of a forced evolution—an uncomfortable but necessary reboot of the U.S. economic operating system. Whether or not it works as intended, he argues, this is not a haphazard policy. It’s a calculated reshaping of global and domestic economic dynamics, and one with enormous implications for trade, energy, inflation, and the average American investor.

@ eac63075:b4988b48

Based on a recent paper that included collaboration from renowned experts such as Lynn Alden, Steve Lee, and Ren Crypto Fish, we discuss in depth how Bitcoin's consensus is built, the main risks, and the complex dynamics of protocol upgrades.

PT-BR version

Podcast https://www.fountain.fm/episode/wbjD6ntQuvX5u2G5BccC

Presentation https://gamma.app/docs/Analyzing-Bitcoin-Consensus-Risks-in-Protocol-Upgrades-p66axxjwaa37ksn

1. Introduction to Consensus in Bitcoin

Consensus in Bitcoin is the foundation that keeps the network secure and functional, allowing users worldwide to perform transactions in a decentralized manner without the need for intermediaries. Since its launch in 2009, Bitcoin is often described as an "immutable" system designed to resist changes, and it is precisely this resistance that ensures its security and stability.

The central idea behind consensus in Bitcoin is to create a set of acceptance rules for blocks and transactions, ensuring that all network participants agree on the transaction history. This prevents "double-spending," where the same bitcoin could be used in two simultaneous transactions, something that would compromise trust in the network.

Evolution of Consensus in Bitcoin

Over the years, consensus in Bitcoin has undergone several adaptations, and the way participants agree on changes remains a delicate process. Unlike traditional systems, where changes can be imposed from the top down, Bitcoin operates in a decentralized model where any significant change needs the support of various groups of stakeholders, including miners, developers, users, and large node operators.

Moreover, the update process is extremely cautious, as hasty changes can compromise the network's security. As a result, the philosophy of "don't fix what isn't broken" prevails, with improvements happening incrementally and only after broad consensus among those involved. This model can make progress seem slow but ensures that Bitcoin remains faithful to the principles of security and decentralization.

---

2. Technical Components of Consensus

Bitcoin's consensus is supported by a set of technical rules that determine what is considered a valid transaction and a valid block on the network. These technical aspects ensure that all nodes—the computers that participate in the Bitcoin network—agree on the current state of the blockchain. Below are the main technical components that form the basis of the consensus.

Validation of Blocks and Transactions

The validation of blocks and transactions is the central point of consensus in Bitcoin. A block is only considered valid if it meets certain criteria, such as maximum size, transaction structure, and the solving of the "Proof of Work" problem. The proof of work, required for a block to be included in the blockchain, is a computational process that ensures the block contains significant computational effort—protecting the network against manipulation attempts.

Transactions, in turn, need to follow specific input and output rules. Each transaction includes cryptographic signatures that prove the ownership of the bitcoins sent, as well as validation scripts that verify if the transaction conditions are met. This validation system is essential for network nodes to autonomously confirm that each transaction follows the rules.

Chain Selection

Another fundamental technical issue for Bitcoin's consensus is chain selection, which becomes especially important in cases where multiple versions of the blockchain coexist, such as after a network split (fork). To decide which chain is the "true" one and should be followed, the network adopts the criterion of the highest accumulated proof of work. In other words, the chain with the highest number of valid blocks, built with the greatest computational effort, is chosen by the network as the official one.

This criterion avoids permanent splits because it encourages all nodes to follow the same main chain, reinforcing consensus.

Soft Forks vs. Hard Forks

In the consensus process, protocol changes can happen in two ways: through soft forks or hard forks. These variations affect not only the protocol update but also the implications for network users:

• Soft Forks: These are changes that are backward compatible. Only nodes that adopt the new update will follow the new rules, but old nodes will still recognize the blocks produced with these rules as valid. This compatibility makes soft forks a safer option for updates, as it minimizes the risk of network division.

• Hard Forks: These are updates that are not backward compatible, requiring all nodes to update to the new version or risk being separated from the main chain. Hard forks can result in the creation of a new coin, as occurred with the split between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash in 2017. While hard forks allow for deeper changes, they also bring significant risks of network fragmentation.

These technical components form the base of Bitcoin's security and resilience, allowing the system to remain functional and immutable without losing the necessary flexibility to evolve over time.

---

3. Stakeholders in Bitcoin's Consensus

Consensus in Bitcoin is not decided centrally. On the contrary, it depends on the interaction between different groups of stakeholders, each with their motivations, interests, and levels of influence. These groups play fundamental roles in how changes are implemented or rejected on the network. Below, we explore the six main stakeholders in Bitcoin's consensus.

1. Economic Nodes

Economic nodes, usually operated by exchanges, custody providers, and large companies that accept Bitcoin, exert significant influence over consensus. Because they handle large volumes of transactions and act as a connection point between the Bitcoin ecosystem and the traditional financial system, these nodes have the power to validate or reject blocks and to define which version of the software to follow in case of a fork.

Their influence is proportional to the volume of transactions they handle, and they can directly affect which chain will be seen as the main one. Their incentive is to maintain the network's stability and security to preserve its functionality and meet regulatory requirements.

2. Investors

Investors, including large institutional funds and individual Bitcoin holders, influence consensus indirectly through their impact on the asset's price. Their buying and selling actions can affect Bitcoin's value, which in turn influences the motivation of miners and other stakeholders to continue investing in the network's security and development.

Some institutional investors have agreements with custodians that may limit their ability to act in network split situations. Thus, the impact of each investor on consensus can vary based on their ownership structure and how quickly they can react to a network change.

3. Media Influencers

Media influencers, including journalists, analysts, and popular personalities on social media, have a powerful role in shaping public opinion about Bitcoin and possible updates. These influencers can help educate the public, promote debates, and bring transparency to the consensus process.

On the other hand, the impact of influencers can be double-edged: while they can clarify complex topics, they can also distort perceptions by amplifying or minimizing change proposals. This makes them a force both of support and resistance to consensus.

4. Miners

Miners are responsible for validating transactions and including blocks in the blockchain. Through computational power (hashrate), they also exert significant influence over consensus decisions. In update processes, miners often signal their support for a proposal, indicating that the new version is safe to use. However, this signaling is not always definitive, and miners can change their position if they deem it necessary.

Their incentive is to maximize returns from block rewards and transaction fees, as well as to maintain the value of investments in their specialized equipment, which are only profitable if the network remains stable.

5. Protocol Developers

Protocol developers, often called "Core Developers," are responsible for writing and maintaining Bitcoin's code. Although they do not have direct power over consensus, they possess an informal veto power since they decide which changes are included in the main client (Bitcoin Core). This group also serves as an important source of technical knowledge, helping guide decisions and inform other stakeholders.

Their incentive lies in the continuous improvement of the network, ensuring security and decentralization. Many developers are funded by grants and sponsorships, but their motivations generally include a strong ideological commitment to Bitcoin's principles.

6. Users and Application Developers

This group includes people who use Bitcoin in their daily transactions and developers who build solutions based on the network, such as wallets, exchanges, and payment platforms. Although their power in consensus is less than that of miners or economic nodes, they play an important role because they are responsible for popularizing Bitcoin's use and expanding the ecosystem.

If application developers decide not to adopt an update, this can affect compatibility and widespread acceptance. Thus, they indirectly influence consensus by deciding which version of the protocol to follow in their applications.

These stakeholders are vital to the consensus process, and each group exerts influence according to their involvement, incentives, and ability to act in situations of change. Understanding the role of each makes it clearer how consensus is formed and why it is so difficult to make significant changes to Bitcoin.

---

4. Mechanisms for Activating Updates in Bitcoin

For Bitcoin to evolve without compromising security and consensus, different mechanisms for activating updates have been developed over the years. These mechanisms help coordinate changes among network nodes to minimize the risk of fragmentation and ensure that updates are implemented in an orderly manner. Here, we explore some of the main methods used in Bitcoin, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as historical examples of significant updates.

Flag Day

The Flag Day mechanism is one of the simplest forms of activating changes. In it, a specific date or block is determined as the activation moment, and all nodes must be updated by that point. This method does not involve prior signaling; participants simply need to update to the new software version by the established day or block.

• Advantages: Simplicity and predictability are the main benefits of Flag Day, as everyone knows the exact activation date.

• Disadvantages: Inflexibility can be a problem because there is no way to adjust the schedule if a significant part of the network has not updated. This can result in network splits if a significant number of nodes are not ready for the update.

An example of Flag Day was the Pay to Script Hash (P2SH) update in 2012, which required all nodes to adopt the change to avoid compatibility issues.

BIP34 and BIP9

BIP34 introduced a more dynamic process, in which miners increase the version number in block headers to signal the update. When a predetermined percentage of the last blocks is mined with this new version, the update is automatically activated. This model later evolved with BIP9, which allowed multiple updates to be signaled simultaneously through "version bits," each corresponding to a specific change.

• Advantages: Allows the network to activate updates gradually, giving more time for participants to adapt.

• Disadvantages: These methods rely heavily on miner support, which means that if a sufficient number of miners do not signal the update, it can be delayed or not implemented.

BIP9 was used in the activation of SegWit (BIP141) but faced challenges because some miners did not signal their intent to activate, leading to the development of new mechanisms.

User Activated Soft Forks (UASF) and User Resisted Soft Forks (URSF)

To increase the decision-making power of ordinary users, the concept of User Activated Soft Fork (UASF) was introduced, allowing node operators, not just miners, to determine consensus for a change. In this model, nodes set a date to start rejecting blocks that are not in compliance with the new update, forcing miners to adapt or risk having their blocks rejected by the network.

URSF, in turn, is a model where nodes reject blocks that attempt to adopt a specific update, functioning as resistance against proposed changes.

• Advantages: UASF returns decision-making power to node operators, ensuring that changes do not depend solely on miners.

• Disadvantages: Both UASF and URSF can generate network splits, especially in cases of strong opposition among different stakeholders.

An example of UASF was the activation of SegWit in 2017, where users supported activation independently of miner signaling, which ended up forcing its adoption.

BIP8 (LOT=True)

BIP8 is an evolution of BIP9, designed to prevent miners from indefinitely blocking a change desired by the majority of users and developers. BIP8 allows setting a parameter called "lockinontimeout" (LOT) as true, which means that if the update has not been fully signaled by a certain point, it is automatically activated.

• Advantages: Ensures that changes with broad support among users are not blocked by miners who wish to maintain the status quo.

• Disadvantages: Can lead to network splits if miners or other important stakeholders do not support the update.

Although BIP8 with LOT=True has not yet been used in Bitcoin, it is a proposal that can be applied in future updates if necessary.

These activation mechanisms have been essential for Bitcoin's development, allowing updates that keep the network secure and functional. Each method brings its own advantages and challenges, but all share the goal of preserving consensus and network cohesion.

---

5. Risks and Considerations in Consensus Updates

Consensus updates in Bitcoin are complex processes that involve not only technical aspects but also political, economic, and social considerations. Due to the network's decentralized nature, each change brings with it a set of risks that need to be carefully assessed. Below, we explore some of the main challenges and future scenarios, as well as the possible impacts on stakeholders.

Network Fragility with Alternative Implementations

One of the main risks associated with consensus updates is the possibility of network fragmentation when there are alternative software implementations. If an update is implemented by a significant group of nodes but rejected by others, a network split (fork) can occur. This creates two competing chains, each with a different version of the transaction history, leading to unpredictable consequences for users and investors.

Such fragmentation weakens Bitcoin because, by dividing hashing power (computing) and coin value, it reduces network security and investor confidence. A notable example of this risk was the fork that gave rise to Bitcoin Cash in 2017 when disagreements over block size resulted in a new chain and a new asset.

Chain Splits and Impact on Stakeholders

Chain splits are a significant risk in update processes, especially in hard forks. During a hard fork, the network is split into two separate chains, each with its own set of rules. This results in the creation of a new coin and leaves users with duplicated assets on both chains. While this may seem advantageous, in the long run, these splits weaken the network and create uncertainties for investors.

Each group of stakeholders reacts differently to a chain split:

• Institutional Investors and ETFs: Face regulatory and compliance challenges because many of these assets are managed under strict regulations. The creation of a new coin requires decisions to be made quickly to avoid potential losses, which may be hampered by regulatory constraints.

• Miners: May be incentivized to shift their computing power to the chain that offers higher profitability, which can weaken one of the networks.

• Economic Nodes: Such as major exchanges and custody providers, have to quickly choose which chain to support, influencing the perceived value of each network.

Such divisions can generate uncertainties and loss of value, especially for institutional investors and those who use Bitcoin as a store of value.

Regulatory Impacts and Institutional Investors

With the growing presence of institutional investors in Bitcoin, consensus changes face new compliance challenges. Bitcoin ETFs, for example, are required to follow strict rules about which assets they can include and how chain split events should be handled. The creation of a new asset or migration to a new chain can complicate these processes, creating pressure for large financial players to quickly choose a chain, affecting the stability of consensus.

Moreover, decisions regarding forks can influence the Bitcoin futures and derivatives market, affecting perception and adoption by new investors. Therefore, the need to avoid splits and maintain cohesion is crucial to attract and preserve the confidence of these investors.

Security Considerations in Soft Forks and Hard Forks

While soft forks are generally preferred in Bitcoin for their backward compatibility, they are not without risks. Soft forks can create different classes of nodes on the network (updated and non-updated), which increases operational complexity and can ultimately weaken consensus cohesion. In a network scenario with fragmentation of node classes, Bitcoin's security can be affected, as some nodes may lose part of the visibility over updated transactions or rules.

In hard forks, the security risk is even more evident because all nodes need to adopt the new update to avoid network division. Experience shows that abrupt changes can create temporary vulnerabilities, in which malicious agents try to exploit the transition to attack the network.

Bounty Claim Risks and Attack Scenarios

Another risk in consensus updates are so-called "bounty claims"—accumulated rewards that can be obtained if an attacker manages to split or deceive a part of the network. In a conflict scenario, a group of miners or nodes could be incentivized to support a new update or create an alternative version of the software to benefit from these rewards.

These risks require stakeholders to carefully assess each update and the potential vulnerabilities it may introduce. The possibility of "bounty claims" adds a layer of complexity to consensus because each interest group may see a financial opportunity in a change that, in the long term, may harm network stability.

The risks discussed above show the complexity of consensus in Bitcoin and the importance of approaching it gradually and deliberately. Updates need to consider not only technical aspects but also economic and social implications, in order to preserve Bitcoin's integrity and maintain trust among stakeholders.

---

6. Recommendations for the Consensus Process in Bitcoin

To ensure that protocol changes in Bitcoin are implemented safely and with broad support, it is essential that all stakeholders adopt a careful and coordinated approach. Here are strategic recommendations for evaluating, supporting, or rejecting consensus updates, considering the risks and challenges discussed earlier, along with best practices for successful implementation.

1. Careful Evaluation of Proposal Maturity

Stakeholders should rigorously assess the maturity level of a proposal before supporting its implementation. Updates that are still experimental or lack a robust technical foundation can expose the network to unnecessary risks. Ideally, change proposals should go through an extensive testing phase, have security audits, and receive review and feedback from various developers and experts.

2. Extensive Testing in Secure and Compatible Networks

Before an update is activated on the mainnet, it is essential to test it on networks like testnet and signet, and whenever possible, on other compatible networks that offer a safe and controlled environment to identify potential issues. Testing on networks like Litecoin was fundamental for the safe launch of innovations like SegWit and the Lightning Network, allowing functionalities to be validated on a lower-impact network before being implemented on Bitcoin.

The Liquid Network, developed by Blockstream, also plays an important role as an experimental network for new proposals, such as OP_CAT. By adopting these testing environments, stakeholders can mitigate risks and ensure that the update is reliable and secure before being adopted by the main network.

3. Importance of Stakeholder Engagement

The success of a consensus update strongly depends on the active participation of all stakeholders. This includes economic nodes, miners, protocol developers, investors, and end users. Lack of participation can lead to inadequate decisions or even future network splits, which would compromise Bitcoin's security and stability.

4. Key Questions for Evaluating Consensus Proposals

To assist in decision-making, each group of stakeholders should consider some key questions before supporting a consensus change:

• Does the proposal offer tangible benefits for Bitcoin's security, scalability, or usability?
• Does it maintain backward compatibility or introduce the risk of network split?
• Are the implementation requirements clear and feasible for each group involved?
• Are there clear and aligned incentives for all stakeholder groups to accept the change?

5. Coordination and Timing in Implementations

Timing is crucial. Updates with short activation windows can force a split because not all nodes and miners can update simultaneously. Changes should be planned with ample deadlines to allow all stakeholders to adjust their systems, avoiding surprises that could lead to fragmentation.

Mechanisms like soft forks are generally preferable to hard forks because they allow a smoother transition. Opting for backward-compatible updates when possible facilitates the process and ensures that nodes and miners can adapt without pressure.

6. Continuous Monitoring and Re-evaluation

After an update, it's essential to monitor the network to identify problems or side effects. This continuous process helps ensure cohesion and trust among all participants, keeping Bitcoin as a secure and robust network.

These recommendations, including the use of secure networks for extensive testing, promote a collaborative and secure environment for Bitcoin's consensus process. By adopting a deliberate and strategic approach, stakeholders can preserve Bitcoin's value as a decentralized and censorship-resistant network.

---

7. Conclusion

Consensus in Bitcoin is more than a set of rules; it's the foundation that sustains the network as a decentralized, secure, and reliable system. Unlike centralized systems, where decisions can be made quickly, Bitcoin requires a much more deliberate and cooperative approach, where the interests of miners, economic nodes, developers, investors, and users must be considered and harmonized. This governance model may seem slow, but it is fundamental to preserving the resilience and trust that make Bitcoin a global store of value and censorship-resistant.

Consensus updates in Bitcoin must balance the need for innovation with the preservation of the network's core principles. The development process of a proposal needs to be detailed and rigorous, going through several testing stages, such as in testnet, signet, and compatible networks like Litecoin and Liquid Network. These networks offer safe environments for proposals to be analyzed and improved before being launched on the main network.

Each proposed change must be carefully evaluated regarding its maturity, impact, backward compatibility, and support among stakeholders. The recommended key questions and appropriate timing are critical to ensure that an update is adopted without compromising network cohesion. It's also essential that the implementation process is continuously monitored and re-evaluated, allowing adjustments as necessary and minimizing the risk of instability.

By following these guidelines, Bitcoin's stakeholders can ensure that the network continues to evolve safely and robustly, maintaining user trust and further solidifying its role as one of the most resilient and innovative digital assets in the world. Ultimately, consensus in Bitcoin is not just a technical issue but a reflection of its community and the values it represents: security, decentralization, and resilience.

---

8. Links

Whitepaper: https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap

Youtube (pt-br): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rARycAibl9o&list=PL-qnhF0qlSPkfhorqsREuIu4UTbF0h4zb

@ eac63075:b4988b48

The future of physical money is at stake, and the discussion about DREX, the new digital currency planned by the Central Bank of Brazil, is gaining momentum. In a candid and intense conversation, Federal Deputy Julia Zanatta (PL/SC) discussed the challenges and risks of this digital transition, also addressing her Bill No. 3,341/2024, which aims to prevent the extinction of physical currency. This bill emerges as a direct response to legislative initiatives seeking to replace physical money with digital alternatives, limiting citizens' options and potentially compromising individual freedom. Let's delve into the main points of this conversation.

https://www.fountain.fm/episode/i5YGJ9Ors3PkqAIMvNQ0

(PT-BR version here)

What is a CBDC?

Before discussing the specifics of DREX, it’s important to understand what a CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) is. CBDCs are digital currencies issued by central banks, similar to a digital version of physical money. Unlike cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, which operate in a decentralized manner, CBDCs are centralized and regulated by the government. In other words, they are digital currencies created and controlled by the Central Bank, intended to replace physical currency.

A prominent feature of CBDCs is their programmability. This means that the government can theoretically set rules about how, where, and for what this currency can be used. This aspect enables a level of control over citizens' finances that is impossible with physical money. By programming the currency, the government could limit transactions by setting geographical or usage restrictions. In practice, money within a CBDC could be restricted to specific spending or authorized for use in a defined geographical area.

In countries like China, where citizen actions and attitudes are also monitored, a person considered to have a "low score" due to a moral or ideological violation may have their transactions limited to essential purchases, restricting their digital currency use to non-essential activities. This financial control is strengthened because, unlike physical money, digital currency cannot be exchanged anonymously.

Practical Example: The Case of DREX During the Pandemic

To illustrate how DREX could be used, an example was given by Eric Altafim, director of Banco Itaú. He suggested that, if DREX had existed during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government could have restricted the currency’s use to a 5-kilometer radius around a person’s residence, limiting their economic mobility. Another proposed use by the executive related to the Bolsa Família welfare program: the government could set up programming that only allows this benefit to be used exclusively for food purchases. Although these examples are presented as control measures for safety or organization, they demonstrate how much a CBDC could restrict citizens' freedom of choice.

To illustrate the potential for state control through a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), such as DREX, it is helpful to look at the example of China. In China, the implementation of a CBDC coincides with the country’s Social Credit System, a governmental surveillance tool that assesses citizens' and companies' behavior. Together, these technologies allow the Chinese government to monitor, reward, and, above all, punish behavior deemed inappropriate or threatening to the government.

How Does China's Social Credit System Work?

Implemented in 2014, China's Social Credit System assigns every citizen and company a "score" based on various factors, including financial behavior, criminal record, social interactions, and even online activities. This score determines the benefits or penalties each individual receives and can affect everything from public transport access to obtaining loans and enrolling in elite schools for their children. Citizens with low scores may face various sanctions, including travel restrictions, fines, and difficulty in securing loans.

With the adoption of the CBDC — or “digital yuan” — the Chinese government now has a new tool to closely monitor citizens' financial transactions, facilitating the application of Social Credit System penalties. China’s CBDC is a programmable digital currency, which means that the government can restrict how, when, and where the money can be spent. Through this level of control, digital currency becomes a powerful mechanism for influencing citizens' behavior.

Imagine, for instance, a citizen who repeatedly posts critical remarks about the government on social media or participates in protests. If the Social Credit System assigns this citizen a low score, the Chinese government could, through the CBDC, restrict their money usage in certain areas or sectors. For example, they could be prevented from buying tickets to travel to other regions, prohibited from purchasing certain consumer goods, or even restricted to making transactions only at stores near their home.

Another example of how the government can use the CBDC to enforce the Social Credit System is by monitoring purchases of products such as alcohol or luxury items. If a citizen uses the CBDC to spend more than the government deems reasonable on such products, this could negatively impact their social score, resulting in additional penalties such as future purchase restrictions or a lowered rating that impacts their personal and professional lives.

In China, this kind of control has already been demonstrated in several cases. Citizens added to Social Credit System “blacklists” have seen their spending and investment capacity severely limited. The combination of digital currency and social scores thus creates a sophisticated and invasive surveillance system, through which the Chinese government controls important aspects of citizens’ financial lives and individual freedoms.

Deputy Julia Zanatta views these examples with great concern. She argues that if the state has full control over digital money, citizens will be exposed to a level of economic control and surveillance never seen before. In a democracy, this control poses a risk, but in an authoritarian regime, it could be used as a powerful tool of repression.

DREX and Bill No. 3,341/2024

Julia Zanatta became aware of a bill by a Workers' Party (PT) deputy (Bill 4068/2020 by Deputy Reginaldo Lopes - PT/MG) that proposes the extinction of physical money within five years, aiming for a complete transition to DREX, the digital currency developed by the Central Bank of Brazil. Concerned about the impact of this measure, Julia drafted her bill, PL No. 3,341/2024, which prohibits the elimination of physical money, ensuring citizens the right to choose physical currency.

“The more I read about DREX, the less I want its implementation,” says the deputy. DREX is a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), similar to other state digital currencies worldwide, but which, according to Julia, carries extreme control risks. She points out that with DREX, the State could closely monitor each citizen’s transactions, eliminating anonymity and potentially restricting freedom of choice. This control would lie in the hands of the Central Bank, which could, in a crisis or government change, “freeze balances or even delete funds directly from user accounts.”

Risks and Individual Freedom

Julia raises concerns about potential abuses of power that complete digitalization could allow. In a democracy, state control over personal finances raises serious questions, and EddieOz warns of an even more problematic future. “Today we are in a democracy, but tomorrow, with a government transition, we don't know if this kind of power will be used properly or abused,” he states. In other words, DREX gives the State the ability to restrict or condition the use of money, opening the door to unprecedented financial surveillance.

EddieOz cites Nigeria as an example, where a CBDC was implemented, and the government imposed severe restrictions on the use of physical money to encourage the use of digital currency, leading to protests and clashes in the country. In practice, the poorest and unbanked — those without regular access to banking services — were harshly affected, as without physical money, many cannot conduct basic transactions. Julia highlights that in Brazil, this situation would be even more severe, given the large number of unbanked individuals and the extent of rural areas where access to technology is limited.

The Relationship Between DREX and Pix

The digital transition has already begun with Pix, which revolutionized instant transfers and payments in Brazil. However, Julia points out that Pix, though popular, is a citizen’s choice, while DREX tends to eliminate that choice. The deputy expresses concern about new rules suggested for Pix, such as daily transaction limits of a thousand reais, justified as anti-fraud measures but which, in her view, represent additional control and a profit opportunity for banks. “How many more rules will banks create to profit from us?” asks Julia, noting that DREX could further enhance control over personal finances.

International Precedents and Resistance to CBDC

The deputy also cites examples from other countries resisting the idea of a centralized digital currency. In the United States, states like New Hampshire have passed laws to prevent the advance of CBDCs, and leaders such as Donald Trump have opposed creating a national digital currency. Trump, addressing the topic, uses a justification similar to Julia’s: in a digitalized system, “with one click, your money could disappear.” She agrees with the warning, emphasizing the control risk that a CBDC represents, especially for countries with disadvantaged populations.

Besides the United States, Canada, Colombia, and Australia have also suspended studies on digital currencies, citing the need for further discussions on population impacts. However, in Brazil, the debate on DREX is still limited, with few parliamentarians and political leaders openly discussing the topic. According to Julia, only she and one or two deputies are truly trying to bring this discussion to the Chamber, making DREX’s advance even more concerning.

Bill No. 3,341/2024 and Popular Pressure

For Julia, her bill is a first step. Although she acknowledges that ideally, it would prevent DREX's implementation entirely, PL 3341/2024 is a measure to ensure citizens' choice to use physical money, preserving a form of individual freedom. “If the future means control, I prefer to live in the past,” Julia asserts, reinforcing that the fight for freedom is at the heart of her bill.

However, the deputy emphasizes that none of this will be possible without popular mobilization. According to her, popular pressure is crucial for other deputies to take notice and support PL 3341. “I am only one deputy, and we need the public’s support to raise the project’s visibility,” she explains, encouraging the public to press other parliamentarians and ask them to “pay attention to PL 3341 and the project that prohibits the end of physical money.” The deputy believes that with a strong awareness and pressure movement, it is possible to advance the debate and ensure Brazilians’ financial freedom.

What’s at Stake?

Julia Zanatta leaves no doubt: DREX represents a profound shift in how money will be used and controlled in Brazil. More than a simple modernization of the financial system, the Central Bank’s CBDC sets precedents for an unprecedented level of citizen surveillance and control in the country. For the deputy, this transition needs to be debated broadly and transparently, and it’s up to the Brazilian people to defend their rights and demand that the National Congress discuss these changes responsibly.

The deputy also emphasizes that, regardless of political or partisan views, this issue affects all Brazilians. “This agenda is something that will affect everyone. We need to be united to ensure people understand the gravity of what could happen.” Julia believes that by sharing information and generating open debate, it is possible to prevent Brazil from following the path of countries that have already implemented a digital currency in an authoritarian way.

A Call to Action

The future of physical money in Brazil is at risk. For those who share Deputy Julia Zanatta’s concerns, the time to act is now. Mobilize, get informed, and press your representatives. PL 3341/2024 is an opportunity to ensure that Brazilian citizens have a choice in how to use their money, without excessive state interference or surveillance.

In the end, as the deputy puts it, the central issue is freedom. “My fear is that this project will pass, and people won’t even understand what is happening.” Therefore, may every citizen at least have the chance to understand what’s at stake and make their voice heard in defense of a Brazil where individual freedom and privacy are respected values.

@ f977c464:32fcbe00

Güneşin kaybolmasının üçüncü günü, saat öğlen on ikiyi yirmi geçiyordu. Trenin kalkmasına yaklaşık iki saat vardı. Hepimiz perondaydık. Valizlerimiz, kolilerimiz, renk renk ve biçimsiz çantalarımızla yan yana dizilmiş, kısa aralıklarla tepemizdeki devasa saati kontrol ediyorduk.

Ama ne kadar dik bakarsak bakalım zaman bir türlü istediğimiz hızla ilerlemiyordu. Herkes birkaç dakika sürmesi gereken alelade bir doğa olayına sıkışıp kalmış, karanlıktan sürünerek çıkmayı deniyordu.

Bekleme salonuna doğru döndüm. Nefesimden çıkan buharın arkasında, kalın taş duvarları ve camlarıyla morg kadar güvenli ve soğuk duruyordu. Cesetleri o yüzden bunun gibi yerlere taşımaya başlamışlardı. Demek insanların bütün iyiliği başkaları onları gördüğü içindi ki gündüzleri gecelerden daha karanlık olduğunda hemen birbirlerinin gırtlağına çökmüş, böğürlerinde delikler açmış, gözlerini oyup kafataslarını parçalamışlardı.

İstasyonun ışığı titrediğinde karanlığın enseme saplandığını hissettim. Eğer şimdi, böyle kalabalık bir yerde elektrik kesilse başımıza ne gelirdi?

İçerideki askerlerden biri bakışlarımı yakalayınca yeniden saate odaklanmış gibi yaptım. Sadece birkaç dakika geçmişti.

“Tarlalarım gitti. Böyle boyum kadar ayçiçeği doluydu. Ah, hepsi ölüp gidiyor. Afitap’ın çiçekleri de gi-”

“Dayı, Allah’ını seversen sus. Hepimizi yakacaksın şimdi.”

Karanlıkta durduğunda, görünmez olmayı istemeye başlıyordun. Kimse seni görmemeli, nefesini bile duymamalıydı. Kimsenin de ayağının altında dolaşmamalıydın; gelip kazayla sana çarpmamalılar, takılıp sendelememeliydiler. Yoksa aslında hedefi sen olmadığın bir öfke gürlemeye başlar, yaşadığın ilk şoku ve acıyı silerek üstünden geçerdi.

İlk konuşan, yaşlıca bir adam, kafasında kasketi, nasırlı ellerine hohluyordu. Gözleri ve burnu kızarmıştı. Güneşin kaybolması onun için kendi başına bir felaket değildi. Hayatına olan pratik yansımalarından korkuyordu olsa olsa. Bir anının kaybolması, bu yüzden çoktan kaybettiği birinin biraz daha eksilmesi. Hayatta kalmasını gerektiren sebepler azalırken, hayatta kalmasını sağlayacak kaynaklarını da kaybediyordu.

Onu susturan delikanlıysa atkısını bütün kafasına sarmış, sakalı ve yüzünün derinliklerine kaçmış gözleri dışında bedeninin bütün parçalarını gizlemeye çalışıyordu. İşte o, güneşin kaybolmasının tam olarak ne anlama geldiğini anlamamış olsa bile, dehşetini olduğu gibi hissedebilenlerdendi.

Güneşin onlardan alındıktan sonra kime verileceğini sormuyorlardı. En başta onlara verildiğinde de hiçbir soru sormamışlardı zaten.

İki saat ne zaman geçer?

Midemin üstünde, sağ tarafıma doğru keskin bir acı hissettim. Karaciğerim. Gözlerimi yumdum. Yanımda biri metal bir nesneyi yere bıraktı. Bir kafesti. İçerisindeki kartalın ıslak kokusu burnuma ulaşmadan önce bile biliyordum bunu.

“Yeniden mi?” diye sordu bana kartal. Kanatları kanlı. Zamanın her bir parçası tüylerinin üstüne çöreklenmişti. Gagası bir şey, tahminen et parçası geveliyor gibi hareket ediyordu. Eski anılar kolay unutulmazmış. Şu anda kafesinin kalın parmaklıklarının ardında olsa da bunun bir aldatmaca olduğunu bir tek ben biliyordum. Her an kanatlarını iki yana uzatıverebilir, hava bu hareketiyle dalgalanarak kafesi esneterek hepimizi içine alacak kadar genişleyebilir, parmaklıklar önce ayaklarımızın altına serilir gibi gözükebilir ama aslında hepimizin üstünde yükselerek tepemize çökebilirdi.

Aşağıya baktım. Tahtalarla zapt edilmiş, hiçbir yere gidemeyen ama her yere uzanan tren rayları. Atlayıp koşsam… Çantam çok ağırdı. Daha birkaç adım atamadan, kartal, suratını bedenime gömerdi.

“Bu sefer farklı,” diye yanıtladım onu. “Yeniden diyemezsin. Tekrarladığım bir şey değil bu. Hatta bir hata yapıyormuşum gibi tonlayamazsın da. Bu sefer, insanların hak etmediğini biliyorum.”

“O zaman daha vahim. Süzme salaksın demektir.”

“İnsanların hak etmemesi, insanlığın hak etmediği anlamına gelmez ki.”

Az önce göz göze geldiğim genççe ama çökük asker hâlâ bana bakıyordu. Bir kartalla konuştuğumu anlamamıştı şüphesiz. Yanımdakilerden biriyle konuştuğumu sanmış olmalıydı. Ama konuştuğum kişiye bakmıyordum ona göre. Çekingence kafamı eğmiştim. Bir kez daha göz göze geldiğimizde içerideki diğer iki askere bir şeyler söyledi, onlar dönüp beni süzerken dışarı çıktı.

Yanımızdaki, az önce konuşan iki adam da şaşkınlıkla bir bana bir kartala bakıyordu.

“Yalnız bu sefer kalbin de kırılacak, Prometheus,” dedi kartal, bana. “Belki son olur. Biliyorsun, bir sürü soruna neden oluyor bu yaptıkların.”

Beni koruyordu sözde. En çok kanıma dokunan buydu. Kasıklarımın üstüne oturmuş, kanlı suratının ardında gözleri parlarken attığı çığlık kulaklarımda titremeye devam ediyordu. Bu tabloda kimsenin kimseyi düşündüğü yoktu. Kartalın, yanımızdaki adamların, artık arkama kadar gelmiş olması gereken askerin, tren raylarının, geçmeyen saatlerin…

Arkamı döndüğümde, asker sahiden oradaydı. Zaten öyle olması gerekiyordu; görmüştüm bunu, biliyordum. Kehanetler… Bir şeyler söylüyordu ama ağzı oynarken sesi çıkmıyordu. Yavaşlamış, kendisini saatin akışına uydurmuştu. Havada donan tükürüğünden anlaşılıyordu, sinirliydi. Korktuğu için olduğunu biliyordum. Her seferinde korkmuşlardı. Beni unutmuş olmaları işlerini kolaylaştırmıyordu. Sadece yeni bir isim vermelerine neden oluyordu. Bu seferkiyle beni lanetleyecekleri kesinleşmişti.

Olması gerekenle olanların farklı olması ne kadar acınasıydı. Olması gerekenlerin doğasının kötücül olmasıysa bir yerde buna dayanıyordu.

“Salaksın,” dedi kartal bana. Zamanı aşan bir çığlık. Hepimizin önüne geçmişti ama kimseyi durduramıyordu.

Sonsuzluğa kaç tane iki saat sıkıştırabilirsiniz?

Ben bir tane bile sıkıştıramadım.

Çantama uzanıyordum. Asker de sırtındaki tüfeğini indiriyordu. Benim acelem yoktu, onunsa eli ayağı birbirine dolaşıyordu. Oysaki her şey tam olması gerektiği anda olacaktı. Kehanet başkasının parmaklarının ucundaydı.

Güneş, bir tüfeğin patlamasıyla yeryüzüne doğdu.

Rayların üzerine serilmiş göğsümün ortasından, bir çantanın içinden.

Not: Bu öykü ilk olarak 2021 yılında Esrarengiz Hikâyeler'de yayımlanmıştır.

@ 502ab02a:a2860397

อะไรคือ Heliotherapy

ถ้าลองหลับตา แล้วนึกถึงคนยุโรปยุคต้นศตวรรษที่ 20 ที่กำลังนอนอาบแดดบนภูเขา ห่มผ้าขนหนูบาง ๆ เปิดผิวให้พระอาทิตย์ลูบไล้ เฮียกำลังนึกถึงภาพของการรักษาโรคอย่างหนึ่งที่เรียกว่า Heliotherapy หรือ การบำบัดด้วยแสงอาทิตย์ ซึ่งเคยเป็นหนึ่งในศาสตร์ทางการแพทย์ที่ถูกยอมรับอย่างเป็นทางการ โดยเฉพาะในยุคที่ยังไม่มี “ยาปฏิชีวนะ”

Heliotherapy ไม่ได้เกิดจากความงมงาย แต่จากหลักฐานจริงจัง โดยเฉพาะผลงานของ ดร.ออกุสต์ โรลเลอร์ (Dr. Auguste Rollier) แพทย์ชาวสวิตเซอร์แลนด์ ผู้บุกเบิกการใช้แสงแดดรักษาผู้ป่วยวัณโรคกระดูกอย่างได้ผลในช่วงต้นศตวรรษที่ 20 เขาก่อตั้ง “โรงพยาบาลแห่งแสงอาทิตย์” บนเทือกเขาแอลป์ โดยให้ผู้ป่วยขึ้นไปอยู่ในที่สูงกว่า 1,500 เมตรเหนือระดับน้ำทะเล แล้วเปิดรับแสงแดดอย่างเป็นระบบ

ที่น่าสนใจคือ โรลเลอร์มีข้อกำหนดชัดเจนว่า ห้ามผู้ป่วยใส่แว่นกันแดดเด็ดขาด เพราะ “ดวงตา” คือหนึ่งในอวัยวะสำคัญที่ต้องรับรังสี UV เพื่อนำข้อมูลไปกระตุ้นต่อมไพเนียลในสมอง ส่งผลต่อวงจรชีวภาพ ฮอร์โมน และระบบภูมิคุ้มกันทั้งหมด ถ้าเราอาบแดดแต่ใส่แว่นดำ เท่ากับปิดประตูสำคัญของระบบบำบัดจากธรรมชาติ

แต่ถ้าย้อนกลับไปก่อนหน้านั้นอีกนิด เราจะเจอ “ต้นฉบับของแนวคิดแสงบำบัด” อยู่ที่ ดร.นีลส์ ฟินเซน (Dr. Niels Ryberg Finsen) นายแพทย์ชาวเดนมาร์ก ผู้ได้รับ รางวัลโนเบลสาขาสรีรวิทยาหรือการแพทย์ ในปี ค.ศ. 1903 จากการใช้แสงสว่างในการรักษาโรค Lupus vulgaris ซึ่งเป็นวัณโรคชนิดเรื้อรังที่แสดงออกบนผิวหนัง โดยเขาออกแบบอุปกรณ์ “Finsen Lamp” เพื่อฉายแสงตรงเข้าไปรักษาเซลล์ผิวโดยเฉพาะ และถือเป็นบิดาแห่ง Phototherapy ยุคใหม่

ทำไมแค่ “แดด” ถึงมีฤทธิ์บำบัด? แสงแดดคือคลังยาแห่งธรรมชาติอย่างแท้จริง เพราะประกอบด้วยรังสี UV หลายชนิด โดยเฉพาะ UVB ที่กระตุ้นให้ผิวหนังสร้าง วิตามินดี (Vitamin D3) ซึ่งมีบทบาทเสมือนฮอร์โมนที่ควบคุมระบบภูมิคุ้มกัน การอักเสบ และการดูดซึมแร่ธาตุต่าง ๆ เช่น แคลเซียมและแมกนีเซียม

แต่แดดไม่ได้มีแค่ UV แสงแดดในช่วงเช้ายังเต็มไปด้วยคลื่นแสงสีแดงและอินฟราเรดใกล้ (Near Infrared Light) ซึ่งมีบทบาทสำคัญในการซ่อมแซมไมโทคอนเดรีย—the powerhouse of the cell และช่วยกระตุ้นการหลั่งไนตริกออกไซด์ในหลอดเลือด ทำให้ระบบไหลเวียนโลหิตดีขึ้น ความดันสมดุลขึ้น และฟื้นฟูอวัยวะลึก ๆ ได้อย่างเงียบ ๆ

พูดง่าย ๆ คือ แดดเช้า = เติมแบตชีวภาพ ยิ่งแสงอาทิตย์กระทบผิวเราผ่าน “ดวงตาเปล่า” (โดยไม่ใส่แว่นกันแดดในช่วงเช้า) ก็ยิ่งช่วย “รีเซ็ตนาฬิกาชีวภาพ” ให้เราตื่นตรงเวลา หลับลึกขึ้น และเพิ่มการหลั่งเมลาโทนินในตอนค่ำโดยอัตโนมัติ

ในโลกที่คนวิ่งหาฮอร์โมนจากขวด การนอนตากแดด 10–20 นาทีต่อวัน กลับกลายเป็นเวทมนตร์ราคาถูกที่เรามองข้าม

และงานวิจัยจาก มหาวิทยาลัยเอดินบะระ (University of Edinburgh) ประเทศสกอตแลนด์ ก็ได้ยืนยันว่า แสงแดดมีส่วนช่วยลดความดันโลหิตได้จริง โดยไม่จำเป็นต้องพึ่งวิตามินดีเลยด้วยซ้ำ เพราะเมื่อแสงยูวีจากดวงอาทิตย์สัมผัสผิวหนัง จะกระตุ้นให้เกิดการปลดปล่อย “ไนตริกออกไซด์” (Nitric Oxide) จากชั้นผิวเข้าสู่ระบบหมุนเวียนโลหิต ซึ่งมีผลทำให้หลอดเลือดขยายตัว ความดันโลหิตลดลง และลดความเสี่ยงโรคหัวใจอย่างเห็นผล

นี่แปลว่าแสงแดดไม่เพียงแค่สว่าง แต่มันกำลัง “พูดภาษาเคมี” กับร่างกายเราอย่างเงียบ ๆ ทุกเช้า

ในยุคที่การแพทย์พัฒนาไปสุดทาง เทคโนโลยีผ่าตัดทำได้ถึงระดับนาโนเมตร กลับมีหมอบางคนหันกลับมาบอกว่า “คุณแค่ต้องออกไปรับแดดเช้า” เพื่อให้ร่างกายฟื้นตัวดีกว่าการพึ่งยาเพียงอย่างเดียว ดีไหมหล่ะ แต่ขอโทษทีคุณหมอที่บอกให้ไปตากแดดช่างมีน้อยเหลือเกินเมื่อดูในภาพรวม

Heliotherapy จึงไม่ใช่แค่การอาบแดด แต่คือการกลับไปเชื่อมโยงกับวงจรธรรมชาติ เหมือนคนโบราณที่เคารพดวงอาทิตย์ เพราะเขารู้ว่าพระอาทิตย์ไม่เคยหลอกเรา

ขณะที่ fiat ผลิตเม็ดสีสังเคราะห์และวิตามินปลอม ๆ พระอาทิตย์กลับให้ของจริง โดยไม่เรียกเก็บภาษีด้วย

ใครมีเวลา วันนี้เฮียขอชวนไปยืนรับแสงเช้า 10 นาที ไม่ต้องทำอะไร แค่ยืนเฉย ๆ ให้แสงซึมเข้าตา ซึมลงผิว แล้วฟังเสียงเงียบของร่างกายที่กำลังซ่อมแซมตัวเอง เงียบจนเราอาจได้ยินเสียงหัวใจบอกว่า "ขอบคุณนะ ที่ออกมารับแดดกับฉัน" #SundaySpecialเราจะไปเป็นหมูแดดเดียว #pirateketo #ตำรับเอ๋

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

Yesterday, I posted about the NBA Bracket Challenge that we're doing with Global Sports Central.

Today we're revealing that the grand prize is a Blockstream JADE cold wallet.

We've also decided on a 1k sats buy-in. Now that's a great expected value!

Follow Global Sports Central on nostr to stay up to date on competition details.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/941901

@ f977c464:32fcbe00

Kendisini aynada ilk defa gördüğü o gün, diğerleri gibi olduğunu anlamıştı. Oysaki her insan biricik olmalıydı. Sözgelimi sinirlendiğinde bir kaşı diğerinden birkaç milimetre daha az çatılabilirdi veya sevindiğinde dudağı ona has bir açıyla dalgalanabilirdi. Hatta bunların hiçbiri mümkün değilse, en azından, gözlerinin içinde sadece onun sahip olabileceği bir ışık parlayabilirdi. Çok sıradan, öyle sıradan ki kimsenin fark etmediği o milyonlarca minik şeyden herhangi biri. Ne olursa.

Ama yansımasına bakarken bunların hiçbirini bulamadı ve diğer günlerden hiç de farklı başlamamış o gün, işe gitmek için vagonunun gelmesini beklediği alelade bir metro istasyonunda, içinde kaybolduğu illüzyon dağılmaya başladı.

İlk önce derisi döküldü. Tam olarak dökülmedi aslında, daha çok kıvılcımlara dönüşüp bedeninden fırlamış ve bir an sonra sönerek külleşmiş, havada dağılmıştı. Ardında da, kaybolmadan hemen önce, kısa süre için hayal meyal görülebilen, bir ruhun yok oluşuna ağıt yakan rengârenk peri cesetleri bırakmıştı. Beklenenin aksine, havaya toz kokusu yayıldı.

Dehşete düştü elbette. Dehşete düştüler. Panikle üstlerini yırtan 50 işçi. Her şeyin sebebiyse o vagon.

Saçları da döküldü. Her tel, yere varmadan önce, her santimde ikiye ayrıla ayrıla yok oldu.

Bütün yüzeylerin mat olduğu, hiçbir şeyin yansımadığı, suyun siyah aktığı ve kendine ancak kameralarla bakabildiğin bir dünyada, vagonun içine yerleştirilmiş bir aynadan ilk defa kendini görmek.

Gözlerinin akları buharlaşıp havada dağıldı, mercekleri boşalan yeri doldurmak için eriyip yayıldı. Gerçeği görmemek için yaratılmış, bu yüzden görmeye hazır olmayan ve hiç olmayacak gözler.

Her şeyin o anda sona erdiğini sanabilirdi insan. Derin bir karanlık ve ölüm. Görmenin görmek olduğu o anın bitişi.

---

Ben geldiğimde ölmüşlerdi.

Yani bozulmuşlardı demek istiyorum.

Belleklerini yeni taşıyıcılara takmam mümkün olmadı. Fiziksel olarak kusursuz durumdaydılar, olmayanları da tamir edebilirdim ama tüm o hengamede kendilerini baştan programlamış ve girdilerini modifiye etmişlerdi.

Belleklerden birini masanın üzerinden ileriye savurdu. Hınca hınç dolu bir barda oturuyorlardı. O ve arkadaşı.

Sırf şu kendisini insan sanan androidler travma geçirip delirmesin diye neler yapıyoruz, insanın aklı almıyor.

Eliyle arkasını işaret etti.

Polislerin söylediğine göre biri vagonun içerisine ayna yerleştirmiş. Bu zavallılar da kapı açılıp bir anda yansımalarını görünce kafayı kırmışlar.

Arkadaşı bunların ona ne hissettirdiğini sordu. Yani o kadar bozuk, insan olduğunu sanan androidi kendilerini parçalamış olarak yerde görmek onu sarsmamış mıydı?

Hayır, sonuçta belirli bir amaç için yaratılmış şeyler onlar. Kaliteli bir bilgisayarım bozulduğunda üzülürüm çünkü parasını ben vermişimdir. Bunlarsa devletin. Bana ne ki?

Arkadaşı anlayışla kafasını sallayıp suyundan bir yudum aldı. Kravatını biraz gevşetti.

Bira istemediğinden emin misin?

İstemediğini söyledi. Sahi, neden deliriyordu bu androidler?

Basit. Onların yapay zekâlarını kodlarken bir şeyler yazıyorlar. Yazılımcılar. Biliyorsun, ben donanımdayım. Bunlar da kendilerini insan sanıyorlar. Tiplerine bak.

Sesini alçalttı.

Arabalarda kaza testi yapılan mankenlere benziyor hepsi. Ağızları burunları bile yok ama şu geldiğimizden beri sakalını düzeltip duruyor mesela. Hayır, hepsi de diğerleri onun sakalı varmış sanıyor, o manyak bir şey.

Arkadaşı bunun delirmeleriyle bağlantısını çözemediğini söyledi. O da normal sesiyle konuşmaya devam etti.

Anlasana, aynayı falan ayırt edemiyor mercekleri. Lönk diye kendilerini görüyorlar. Böyle, olduğu gibi...

Nedenmiş peki? Ne gerek varmış?

Ne bileyim be abicim! Ahiret soruları gibi.

Birasına bakarak dalıp gitti. Sonra masaya abanarak arkadaşına iyice yaklaştı. Bulanık, bir tünelin ucundaki biri gibi, şekli şemalı belirsiz bir adam.

Ben seni nereden tanıyorum ki ulan? Kimsin sen?

Belleği makineden çıkardılar. İki kişiydiler. Soruşturmadan sorumlu memurlar.

─ Baştan mı başlıyoruz, diye sordu belleği elinde tutan ilk memur.

─ Bir kere daha deneyelim ama bu sefer direkt aynayı sorarak başla, diye cevapladı ikinci memur.

─ Bence de. Yeterince düzgün çalışıyor.

Simülasyon yüklenirken, ayakta, biraz arkada duran ve alnını kaşıyan ikinci memur sormaktan kendisini alamadı:

─ Bu androidleri niye böyle bir olay yerine göndermişler ki? Belli tost olacakları. İsraf. Gidip biz baksak aynayı kırıp delilleri mahvetmek zorunda da kalmazlar.

Diğer memur sandalyesinde hafifçe dönecek oldu, o sırada soruyu bilgisayarın hoparlöründen teknisyen cevapladı.

Hangi işimizde bir yamukluk yok ki be abi.

---

Ama bir son değildi. Üstlerindeki tüm illüzyon dağıldığında ve çıplak, cinsiyetsiz, birbirinin aynı bedenleriyle kaldıklarında sıra dünyaya gelmişti.

Yere düştüler. Elleri -bütün bedeni gibi siyah turmalinden, boğumları çelikten- yere değdiği anda, metronun zemini dağıldı.

Yerdeki karolar öncesinde beyazdı ve çok parlaktı. Tepelerindeki floresan, ışığını olduğu gibi yansıtıyor, tek bir lekenin olmadığı ve tek bir tozun uçmadığı istasyonu aydınlatıyorlardı.

Duvarlara duyurular asılmıştı. Örneğin, yarın akşam kültür merkezinde 20.00’da başlayacak bir tekno blues festivalinin cıvıl cıvıl afişi vardı. Onun yanında daha geniş, sarı puntolu harflerle yazılmış, yatay siyah kesiklerle çerçevesi çizilmiş, bir platformdan düşen çöp adamın bulunduğu “Dikkat! Sarı bandı geçmeyin!” uyarısı. Biraz ilerisinde günlük resmi gazete, onun ilerisinde bir aksiyon filminin ve başka bir romantik komedi filminin afişleri, yapılacakların ve yapılmayacakların söylendiği küçük puntolu çeşitli duyurular... Duvar uzayıp giden bir panoydu. On, on beş metrede bir tekrarlanıyordu.

Tüm istasyonun eni yüz metre kadar. Genişliği on metre civarı.

Önlerinde, açık kapısından o mendebur aynanın gözüktüğü vagon duruyordu. Metro, istasyona sığmayacak kadar uzundu. Bir kılıcın keskinliğiyle uzanıyor ama yer yer vagonların ek yerleriyle bölünüyordu.

Hiçbir vagonda pencere olmadığı için metronun içi, içlerindekiler meçhuldü.

Sonrasında karolar zerrelerine ayrılarak yükseldi. Floresanın ışığında her yeri toza boğdular ve ortalığı gri bir sisin altına gömdüler. Çok kısa bir an. Afişleri dalgalandırmadılar. Dalgalandırmaya vakitleri olmadı. Yerlerinden söküp aldılar en fazla. Işık birkaç kere sönüp yanarak direndi. Son kez söndüğünde bir daha geri gelmedi.

Yine de etraf aydınlıktı. Kırmızı, her yere eşit dağılan soluk bir ışıkla.

Yer tamamen tele dönüşmüştü. Altında çapraz hatlarla desteklenmiş demir bir iskelet. Işık birkaç metreden daha fazla aşağıya uzanamıyordu. Sonsuzluğa giden bir uçurum.

Duvarın yerini aynı teller ve demir iskelet almıştı. Arkasında, birbirine vidalarla tutturulmuş demir plakalardan oluşan, üstünden geçen boruların ek yerlerinden bazen ince buharların çıktığı ve bir süre asılı kaldıktan sonra ağır, yağlı bir havayla sürüklendiği bir koridor.

Diğer tarafta paslanmış, pencerelerindeki camlar kırıldığı için demir plakalarla kapatılmış külüstür bir metro. Kapının karşısındaki aynadan her şey olduğu gibi yansıyordu.

---

Bir konteynırın içini andıran bir evde, gerçi gayet de birbirine eklenmiş konteynırlardan oluşan bir şehirde “andıran” demek doğru olmayacağı için düpedüz bir konteynırın içinde, masaya mum görüntüsü vermek için koyulmuş, yarı katı yağ atıklarından şekillendirilmiş kütleleri yakmayı deniyordu. Kafasında hayvan kıllarından yapılmış grili siyahlı bir peruk. Aynı kıllardan kendisine gür bir bıyık da yapmıştı.

Üstünde mavi çöp poşetlerinden yapılmış, kravatlı, şık bir takım.

Masanın ayakları yerine oradan buradan çıkmış parçalar konulmuştu: bir arabanın şaft mili, üst üste konulmuş ve üstünde yazı okunamayan tenekeler, boş kitaplar, boş gazete balyaları... Hiçbir şeye yazı yazılmıyordu, gerek yoktu da zaten çünkü merkez veri bankası onları fark ettirmeden, merceklerden giren veriyi sentezleyerek insanlar için dolduruyordu. Yani, androidler için. Farklı şekilde isimlendirmek bir fark yaratacaksa.

Onların mercekleri için değil. Bağlantıları çok önceden kopmuştu.

─ Hayatım, sofra hazır, diye bağırdı yatak odasındaki karısına.

Sofrada tabak yerine düz, bardak yerine bükülmüş, çatal ve bıçak yerine sivriltilmiş plakalar.

Karısı salonun kapısında durakladı ve ancak kulaklarına kadar uzanan, kocasınınkine benzeyen, cansız, ölü hayvanların kıllarından ibaret peruğunu eliyle düzeltti. Dudağını, daha doğrusu dudağının olması gereken yeri koyu kırmızı bir yağ tabakasıyla renklendirmeyi denemişti. Biraz da yanaklarına sürmüştü.

─ Nasıl olmuş, diye sordu.

Sesi tek düzeydi ama hafif bir neşe olduğunu hissettiğinize yemin edebilirdiniz.

Üzerinde, çöp poşetlerinin içini yazısız gazete kağıtlarıyla doldurarak yaptığı iki parça giysi.

─ Çok güzelsin, diyerek kravatını düzeltti kocası.

─ Sen de öylesin, sevgilim.

Yaklaşıp kocasını öptü. Kocası da onu. Sonra nazikçe elinden tutarak, sandalyesini geriye çekerek oturmasına yardım etti.

Sofrada yemek niyetine hiçbir şey yoktu. Gerek de yoktu zaten.

Konteynırın kapısı gürültüyle tekmelenip içeri iki memur girene kadar birbirlerine öyküler anlattılar. O gün neler yaptıklarını. İşten erken çıkıp yemyeşil çimenlerde gezdiklerini, uçurtma uçurduklarını, kadının nasıl o elbiseyi bulmak için saatlerce gezip yorulduğunu, kocasının kısa süreliğine işe dönüp nasıl başarılı bir hamleyle yaşanan krizi çözdüğünü ve kadının yanına döndükten sonra, alışveriş merkezinde oturdukları yeni dondurmacının dondurmalarının ne kadar lezzetli olduğunu, boğazlarının ağrımasından korktuklarını...

Akşam film izleyebilirlerdi, televizyonda -boş ve mat bir plaka- güzel bir film oynayacaktı.

İki memur. Çıplak bedenleriyle birbirinin aynı. Ellerindeki silahları onlara doğrultmuşlardı. Mum ışığında, tertemiz bir örtünün serili olduğu masada, bardaklarında şaraplarla oturan ve henüz sofranın ortasındaki hindiye dokunmamış çifti gördüklerinde bocaladılar.

Hiç de androidlere bilinçli olarak zarar verebilecek gibi gözükmüyorlardı.

─ Sessiz kalma hakkına sahipsiniz, diye bağırdı içeri giren ikinci memur. Söylediğiniz her şey...

Cümlesini bitiremedi. Yatak odasındaki, masanın üzerinden gördüğü o şey, onunla aynı hareketleri yapan android, yoksa, bir aynadaki yansıması mıydı?

Bütün illüzyon o anda dağılmaya başladı.

Not: Bu öykü ilk olarak 2020 yılında Esrarengiz Hikâyeler'de yayımlanmıştır.

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

@cryotosensei, is this right?

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/941895

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Embarking on the journey of operating your own Lightning node on the Bitcoin Layer 2 network is more than just a tech-savvy endeavor; it's a step into a realm of financial autonomy and cutting-edge innovation. By running a node, you become a vital part of a revolutionary movement that's reshaping how we think about money and digital transactions. This role not only offers a unique perspective on blockchain technology but also places you at the heart of a community dedicated to decentralization and network resilience. Beyond the technicalities, it's about embracing a new era of digital finance, where you contribute directly to the network's security, efficiency, and growth, all while gaining personal satisfaction and potentially lucrative rewards.

In essence, running your own Lightning node is a powerful way to engage with the forefront of blockchain technology, assert financial independence, and contribute to a more decentralized and efficient Bitcoin network. It's an adventure that offers both personal and communal benefits, from gaining in-depth tech knowledge to earning a place in the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency.

Running your own Lightning node for the Bitcoin Layer 2 network can be an empowering and beneficial endeavor. Here are 10 reasons why you might consider taking on this task:

1. Direct Contribution to Decentralization: Operating a node is a direct action towards decentralizing the Bitcoin network, crucial for its security and resistance to control or censorship by any single entity.

2. Financial Autonomy: Owning a node gives you complete control over your financial transactions on the network, free from reliance on third-party services, which can be subject to fees, restrictions, or outages.

3. Advanced Network Participation: As a node operator, you're not just a passive participant but an active player in shaping the network, influencing its efficiency and scalability through direct involvement.

4. Potential for Higher Revenue: With strategic management and optimal channel funding, your node can become a preferred route for transactions, potentially increasing the routing fees you can earn.

5. Cutting-Edge Technological Engagement: Running a node puts you at the forefront of blockchain and bitcoin technology, offering insights into future developments and innovations.

6. Strengthened Network Security: Each new node adds to the robustness of the Bitcoin network, making it more resilient against attacks and failures, thus contributing to the overall security of the ecosystem.

7. Personalized Fee Structures: You have the flexibility to set your own fee policies, which can balance earning potential with the service you provide to the network.

8. Empowerment Through Knowledge: The process of setting up and managing a node provides deep learning opportunities, empowering you with knowledge that can be applied in various areas of blockchain and fintech.

9. Boosting Transaction Capacity: By running a node, you help to increase the overall capacity of the Lightning Network, enabling more transactions to be processed quickly and at lower costs.

10. Community Leadership and Reputation: As an active node operator, you gain recognition within the Bitcoin community, which can lead to collaborative opportunities and a position of thought leadership in the space.

These reasons demonstrate the impactful and transformative nature of running a Lightning node, appealing to those who are deeply invested in the principles of bitcoin and wish to actively shape its future. Jump aboard, and embrace the journey toward full independence. 🐶🐾🫡🚀🚀🚀

@ 8671a6e5:f88194d1

intro

Full disclosure : I bought multiple bitcoin art items to support artists

Bitcoin has absorbed old tropes from finance, tech, and economics, fundamentally reshaping how we think about money. But Bitcoin art? It should be a companion on the journey to a Bitcoin standard. Yet it doesn’t even seem to be trying. Every artistic movement worth its salt needs something to push against—to rebel, to spark thought, to provoke, or at the very least, to represent a technical or methodological leap forward in its field.

Pointillism comes to mind as an example in painting.

In this piece, I take a brief stroll into the subjective realm of art, specifically exploring art in the Bitcoin space—if such a thing truly exists. Some people might not like it, but as someone who has created modern art myself, I can confidently say that artists will emerge stronger from this transitional phase of Bitcoin art, whatever this era may be called later.

The art corner You know the drill. You visit any Bitcoin conference and there’s the obligatory “art corner” or gallery. Funny, wasn’t it just a few years back that a single decent artwork was a rarity needing a proper place for being shown tot he public? Now, every conference (small or big) needs this curated space, crammed with artists all vying for a sliver of attention.

And what do you usually find? A collection of the utterly predictable, the profoundly uninspired, the tiresomely repetitive, and anything but artistically groundbreaking amidst some exceptional pieces that will be snatched up almost immediately.

The themes are often so worn out, they’re practically a self-parody version of bitcoin art:

Animals holding signs (with of course… bitcoin logos)

Whales, dolphins, and the aquatic crew: The go-to, utterly drained metaphor for Bitcoin wealth, rendered in every conceivable medium with sea creatures.

Majestic vistas with bitcoin slogans: Think inspirational landscapes defaced with inscriptions or cryptic (not really) messages.

Women cradling blocks: Because apparently, nothing screams "Bitcoin" like a woman clutching a perfectly geometric cube. Bonus points if there are more painted women on a canvas, than actual women at the event.

Coins, coins, and more coins: Gold, silver, pixelated, abstract – just in case anyone forgot Bitcoin isn't a physical trinket.

Collages of Bitcoin celebs and memes: Why bother with originality when you can just mash up some social posts?

Reheated classics with an orange filter: Slap some orange highlights and a Bitcoin logo on a famous painting, and voilà! “Bitcoin art.” Bitcoin Pop-art, Bitcoin punk, Bitcoin collages…

It’s like the whole Bitcoin art scene is endlessly regurgitating the same tired ideas, and pouring a lot of time and effort in being just a fancy washing machine of orange t-shirts.

Most of it—not all, mind you, as there are people with exceptional thought and even more exceptional work—is no more than Bitcoin-themed art. By "theme," I mean the color orange or a “B,” much like you’d see M&M’s-themed coffee mugs, M&M’s t-shirts, or M&M’s-themed playing cards.

Now, let’s be clear: this isn’t about slagging off the artists themselves. I know how hard it is to thrive in this space, and I also learned about the time and effort put in to any work (the perception of the artwork has nothing to do with this at all!)

The dedication and passion within the bitcoin art scene are undeniable. Making art in a niche like Bitcoin is a tough gig (and often a thankless one, given the whole value-4-value thing seems perpetually broken). They deserve respect for putting themselves out there, doing the work and trying to make their passion work.

Many genuinely believe in what they’re creating, even if not everyone is convinced or will like a work of art. However, a lot of them are chasing a mirage, much like those hoping for an oasis of Bitcoin jobs in the desert. Many artists dream of turning their art into a business or a career move, and some even try to make a full-time living from it. That’s admirable, but I’m convinced it’s often a ruse, where your money, time, and effort dress up someone else’s business ideas and sense of branding. In my opinion, the real art movement in Bitcoin has yet to take off. It will need people with great ideas, motivation, know-how, and effort, for sure!

So I repeat the issue isn’t the individuals, the artists; it’s the collective creative stagnation that comes from clamoring to the general interest of this perceived “bitcoiner” as an audience.

Target < B > Audience

Only, this audience is usually not the target audience for the artworks itself. Art needs to have room to inspire, be free and relay an idea (even if that idea challenges another idea). That can’t be done to a target audience that just wants to sell their stuff to each other at a conference (see my piece on Bitcoin conferences for that) neither can it be a target audience that even is too cheap to buy a ticket and freeloads themselves into an conference.

Bitcoin is supposed to be revolutionary, yet so much of its art (or perceived art) feels like a tacked-on commercial necessity or, worse, a desperate attempt at self-validation. Most of it is just a perpetual branding motion from a non-existing marketing team.

The target audience is usually even worse. Not knowing what they’re looking at, out of their element and knowing they should and could support the artists and their work. A lot is depending on why this audience is wandering through a conference gallery in the first place.

If most people at a conference are the usuals, the sellers, the company people, then they're used to seeing these artists and their art pieces. No one is amazed anymore. Which is in fact a sad thing to happen.

I can't imagine how incredibly hard it must be to try to sell something as bitcoin art to this kind of audience, while trying to believe that a B-logo on an excerpt of the whitepaper is worth the effort. (I don’t think it is, but tastes differ, some people prefer a Whopper over a nice steak dinner)

Signaling “membership” in the bitcoin community is important to some, and they do that through hats, t-shirts, pins and hoodies, not buying a bitcoin artwork.

Art is inherently subjective, fluid, and deeply personal.

I love Kusama’s polka dots, someone else might be into Herman Brood’s chaotic paintings, and someone else might get all nostalgic over an Anton Pieck candy store drawings.

The contradiction Bitcoin: The hardest money ever created. Objectively verifiable. Math-based. Impersonal. Code.

The clash is between feeling and finance, between cold emotionless, hard numbers and warm, beating hearts.

That’s why it's always a bit surreal to see people that sit in a conference room, go from a deep dive into Lightning Network scalability or Bitcoin’s code ossification; and see them wandering through an “art gallery” filled with pieces that are the polar opposite of anything remotely code-related. The cold hearts walk amongst the works of warmth. The trustless math calculates their steps and starts to look at something that’s exposed to a public of that’s not there for the art, but the mimicking of such a think in their setting makes them have their own élan, grandeur. It feels forced. And to me, it feels even wrong to see people walk out of a conference room, right into the art gallery… where they’re usually stroll around out of boredom or just as a form of a break. It’s almost disrespectful, and I feel art needs its own place, the right setting. And that setting is definitely not a bitcoin conference.

You see tech and finance folks just standing there, at these art corners looking at the art pieces like cows watching a drone show.

You feel this subtle pressure to act like it’s profound, even though it rarely is. But you’re there, so you play along with the charade as well. It’s miserable to see. Certainly when some people are more interested in buying the piece of mind of the artist, the way of life or a glimmer of independence they’re missing themselves.

I believe bitcoin art is rarely bought for anything else than capturing the reality and authenticity of the artists. Artists know that. And they sell that authenticity (out) to eat, drink, sleep and pay their rent. Authenticity can be double spent, unlike the hard money asset where it’s supposedly all about. Artists have very big blocks.

It’s a bit like that hyped-up restaurant that turns out to be serving dressed-up bar food, but you’re with friends, so you pretend that $35 hors d'oeuvre doesn’t taste suspiciously like steamed shoe laces. Theaters are sometimes food bars or galleries. Proof of fart Then there’s the awkward issue of selling this stuff. How do you, as an artist, “comment on” or “complete” an asset in an artistic way, while that asset appreciates by an average of 40 to 70% a year?

Buying traditional art as an investment is one thing, driven by aesthetics or emotional connection. But buying Bitcoin art with Bitcoin? That’s a financial decision triggering regret (almost for sure). Think about it: 0.1 BTC spent on a canvas today, isn’t just a fixed one-time cost; it’s a future opportunity cost.

That same Bitcoin could be worth significantly more in a few years. The artwork, not so much, not even a Picasso painting or a Hokusai manages that kind of annual return. So, unless you’re head-over-heels for the piece (or the artist), buying Bitcoin art with Bitcoin is almost certainly a bad trade financially – though, so is buying that fancy coffee machine you'll use twice or getting a diamond ring for you loved one.

Of course, this isn't a definitive argument against it (it's subjective, remember). But it's a factor, just one element. People who buy art to lock it away into a vault aren't the same folks milling around a Bitcoin conference, presumably. But still.

Purpose

Historically, in the West at least, art served many purposes: glorifying churches, telling stories to the illiterate, and expressing the full spectrum of human emotion (pain, regret, doubt, madness, etc.). There was always a demand, whether from religious institutions, the populace, or a desire for education and status. The demand rarely came from onlookers or passive walk-ins. You can only walk in after the demand has been met. The real commanding force in Bitcoin art isn’t the financial types in suits or the grifter with a few stickers who got into the conference for free and smells like weed. The demand comes from people who love to cultivate the branding to propel themselves forward.

In Bitcoin? None of that. There’s little genuine demand, I’d argue. The demand seems mostly driven by the artists themselves wanting to participate. Which, in itself, makes the act of creation worthwhile for them. But the audience demand feels… manufactured. Nobody wakes up thinking: “.. I sure hope there’s a Bitcoin art gallery at this conference...”

This low-to-nonexistent demand, however, presents a massive opportunity to actually impress. Low expectations mean impact is easier to achieve in a lasting way. But that impact evaporates fast if all the visitors get is the same old themes with some orange varnish or a monkey holding a sign.

"Proof of work" isn’t enough here; we already have that in the bitcoin network. Bitcoin art need "proof of thought". Sure, Bitcoin artists put in the hours. Their work is literally proof of effort. But effort alone doesn’t equal value – originality does. Copying Warhol, Mondrian, or Van Gogh and slapping a Bitcoin twist on it isn’t the high level of creativity that can pull art lovers in (and even make them bitcoiners); on the contrary it’s opportunism. And in a space that seems to thrive on recycling successful (or at least visible or temporary cool) ideas, genuine artistic innovation is a rare beast.

Bitcoin art could be so much more. And yes that’s subjective, but at the same time, … walk around at any art gallery and be honest with yourself as a person and buy what you really like, support the artists and the scene, and at the same time realize you’re playing dress up.

There should be so much more, as a separate art movement. It could delve into the philosophy of decentralization, the tension between digital scarcity and creativity, the profound societal shifts Bitcoin is triggering. Instead, we’re mostly drowning in kitsch and thinly veiled cash grabs. The Bitcoin art world doesn’t need more bodies; it needs better minds. We don’t need bigger blocks, we don’t need blocks at all!

The uncomfortable truth is that many Bitcoin artists are here chasing opportunities, just like the rest of us. But spotting an opportunity doesn’t magically transform you into an artist.

I could “find the opportunity” to be a star in the hypothetical Bitcoin basketball league, being one of the first to join. But compared to the global pool of professional basketball talent, I’d likely be laughably bad. I’m not even tall enough to reach most pro players’ armpits, let alone dunk. Yet, in òur tiny Bitcoin league WBBF (World Bitcoin Basketball Federation), I’d be a legend, an OG, demanding respect for my early participation and best-dunk-champion. Just like some Bitcoin artists seem to expect accolades for a weak, orange-tinted imitation of 1960s pop art.

I wouldn’t cut it in any real basketball club, probably not even the lowest amateur league, considering my limited knowledge of the rules. Do you have to run back to the center? Can you tackle other players? Is snatching the ball mid-dribble legal? No clue.

But I could hang around the basketball scene a bit, soak up the jargon, maybe buy a sports drink for a better player to glean some knowledge, and then clumsily mimic their moves while still being terrible at dribbling. I’de buy the right shoes as well. To fit in. Just like bitcoiners buy the right t-shirts.

The same principle applies to some Bitcoin musicians and other creatives. Being the only one doing something – be it Bitcoin-themed sculptures, paintings, sci-fi, or whale graffiti murals – doesn’t automatically make you a leading figure. It just makes you… the only one. Being the sole sci-fi filmmaker in Bangladesh makes you the top of your national field, sure, but it doesn’t make you the next Kubrick. Likewise, airbrushing an orange “B” on a canvas doesn’t turn you into the next Georgia O’Keeffe.

The Bitcoin world thrives on competition and proof of work. Perhaps it’s high time Bitcoin art did the same. We need a battle of ideas, experiments, and genuine insights, not just more orange paint, paragraphs of the white paper and some copper wires.

The genuinely sad part is the sheer effort many of the artists pour into their work! But there’s a limit to how much you can make people want to buy an art piece simply because it has a Bitcoin theme. Go beyond that.

Get real

Real Bitcoin art, in whatever form it takes, will command a high valuation because it will be scarce, original, and have Bitcoin not just as a subject, but woven into its very fabric. That form (and there will be many), in my opinion, is still waiting to be discovered. And I’m fairly certain it won’t be found in a conference gallery, where bored artists sit next to their work, politely nodding at every bloke who wants to sound knowledgeable about art for five minutes or tries to make himself look like a big shot. Because let’s face it, I’ve yet to meet a Bitcoiner with a genuine understanding of art history or a truly discerning eye.

Some starting points, perhaps (just my two cents) :

Art that embodies decentralization itself, inviting audience participation and co-creation, mirroring Bitcoin’s ethos but yet to be fully realized in the art world. Including consensus.

Art that incorporates distributed consensus or a rotating "proof of work" concept in its creation or presentation.

Purely mathematical art forms that resonate with Bitcoin’s underlying principles.

The possibilities are vast. Or maybe, just maybe, Bitcoin itself is our art, and we don’t need all this orange-tinged stuff cluttering up galleries nobody asked for.

And why not paint blocks holding women, instead of women holding blocks? Or why not have inflation-resistant art? Or math-based art that isn’t even possible to show on a canvas?

On that subject, the author of this piece enjoys making art as well and conducted a small experiment. I've performed a "life performance" approximately three times now, which I consider pure Bitcoin art. This was an action, not a physical object. It demonstrated work I personally delivered as “a miner” (function in this art piece), and during the process, people could verify it and even received my block subsidy (effort). So far, only one person has recognized this art form; the rest were unaware. Since it's an action, not an object, it's intangible unless you witnessed it. This is my way of saying, "you are the artist." According to the bitcoin ethos.

Interestingly enough, other people, even those involved in Bitcoin art themselves (!), didn't see it. This amused me because, much like the early weeks of Bitcoin's network growth, many initially failed to recognize its potential. Perhaps this parallel should be enough for us all to understand the true nature of Bitcoin art.

The Artistic Dare:

Here’s a challenge, not to your wallet, but to your creative soul: conceive and execute a piece of art that embodies the spirit and principles of Bitcoin in a way that is genuinely original, thought-provoking, and resonates beyond the immediate Bitcoin echo chamber. Forget the predictable iconography. Dig deeper.

If you can create something truly compelling, something that makes us see Bitcoin – or art – in a new light, then you’ve truly created Bitcoin art. And then comes the extra real challenge: finding someone who can and would pay for it, and at the same time “gets it”.

The main challenge is creating real art—a path, a genre—where a standalone Bitcoin art gallery can thrive outside the conferences and the small echo chamber of the “what do you sell?” crowd.

Don’t sell your dreams and authenticity to bored traders or bitcoin consultants. It’s like serving the finest wine to a bunch of alcoholics in a bar at 4 am.

Playing it safe with themes and artworks that can’t cross into the real art scene (even the underground art scene, let alone the corporate art) will not be as long-lived as bitcoin itself. Trying to spark interest from art lovers in general, will be the killer app, and will make bitcoin art into a movement. And that’s what we all need to make it art,… the pieces can’t exist without the movement. I hope someone will get the right spark, idea and fire going.

But until then we’ll be stuck with people painting a chimpanzee holding a glittering Bitcoin logo and chatting with any dude that wants to feel like someone at a conference.

Good luck.

AVB

@ 826e9f89:ffc5c759

What follows began as snippets of conversations I have been having for years, on and off, here and there. It will likely eventually be collated into a piece I have been meaning to write on “payments” as a whole. I foolishly started writing this piece years ago, not realizing that the topic is gargantuan and for every week I spend writing it I have to add two weeks to my plan. That may or may not ever come to fruition, but in the meantime, Tether announced it was issuing on Taproot Assets and suddenly everybody is interested again. This is as good a catalyst as any to carve out my “stablecoin thesis”, such as it exists, from “payments”, and put it out there for comment and feedback.

In contrast to the “Bitcoiner take” I will shortly revert to, I invite the reader to keep the following potential counterargument in mind, which might variously be termed the “shitcoiner”, “realist”, or “cynical” take, depending on your perspective: that stablecoins have clear product-market-fit. Now, as a venture capitalist and professional thinkboi focusing on companies building on Bitcoin, I obviously think that not only is Bitcoin the best money ever invented and its monetization is pretty much inevitable, but that, furthermore, there is enormous, era-defining long-term potential for a range of industries in which Bitcoin is emerging as superior technology, even aside from its role as money. But in the interest not just of steelmanning but frankly just of honesty, I would grudgingly agree with the following assessment as of the time of writing: the applications of crypto (inclusive of Bitcoin but deliberately wider) that have found product-market-fit today, and that are not speculative bets on future development and adoption, are: Bitcoin as savings technology, mining as a means of monetizing energy production, and stablecoins.

I think there are two typical Bitcoiner objections to stablecoins of significantly greater importance than all others: that you shouldn’t be supporting dollar hegemony, and that you don’t need a blockchain. I will elaborate on each of these, and for the remainder of the post will aim to produce a synthesis of three superficially contrasting (or at least not obviously related) sources of inspiration: these objections, the realisation above that stablecoins just are useful, and some commentary on technical developments in Bitcoin and the broader space that I think inform where things are likely to go. As will become clear as the argument progresses, I actually think the outcome to which I am building up is where things have to go. I think the technical and economic incentives at play make this an inevitability rather than a “choice”, per se. Given my conclusion, which I will hold back for the time being, this is a fantastically good thing, hence I am motivated to write this post at all!

Objection 1: Dollar Hegemony

I list this objection first because there isn’t a huge amount to say about it. It is clearly a normative position, and while I more or less support it personally, I don’t think that it is material to the argument I am going on to make, so I don’t want to force it on the reader. While the case for this objection is probably obvious to this audience (isn’t the point of Bitcoin to destroy central banks, not further empower them?) I should at least offer the steelman that there is a link between this and the realist observation that stablecoins are useful. The reason they are useful is because people prefer the dollar to even shitter local fiat currencies. I don’t think it is particularly fruitful to say that they shouldn’t. They do. Facts don’t care about your feelings. There is a softer bridging argument to be made here too, to the effect that stablecoins warm up their users to the concept of digital bearer (ish) assets, even though these particular assets are significantly scammier than Bitcoin. Again, I am just floating this, not telling the reader they should or shouldn’t buy into it.

All that said, there is one argument I do want to put my own weight behind, rather than just float: stablecoin issuance is a speculative attack on the institution of fractional reserve banking. A “dollar” Alice moves from JPMorgan to Tether embodies two trade-offs from Alice’s perspective: i) a somewhat opaque profile on the credit risk of the asset: the likelihood of JPMorgan ever really defaulting on deposits vs the operator risk of Tether losing full backing and/or being wrench attacked by the Federal Government and rugging its users. These risks are real but are almost entirely political. I’m skeptical it is meaningful to quantify them, but even if it is, I am not the person to try to do it. Also, more transparently to Alice, ii) far superior payment rails (for now, more on this to follow).

However, from the perspective of the fiat banking cartel, fractional reserve leverage has been squeezed. There are just as many notional dollars in circulation, but there the backing has been shifted from levered to unlevered issuers. There are gradations of relevant objections to this: while one might say, Tether’s backing comes from Treasuries, so you are directly funding US debt issuance!, this is a bit silly in the context of what other dollars one might hold. It’s not like JPMorgan is really competing with the Treasury to sell credit into the open market. Optically they are, but this is the core of the fiat scam. Via the guarantees of the Federal Reserve System, JPMorgan can sell as much unbacked credit as it wants knowing full well the difference will be printed whenever this blows up. Short-term Treasuries are also JPMorgan’s most pristine asset safeguarding its equity, so the only real difference is that Tether only holds Treasuries without wishing more leverage into existence. The realization this all builds up to is that, by necessity,

Tether is a fully reserved bank issuing fiduciary media against the only dollar-denominated asset in existence whose value (in dollar terms) can be guaranteed. Furthermore, this media arguably has superior “moneyness” to the obvious competition in the form of US commercial bank deposits by virtue of its payment rails.

That sounds pretty great when you put it that way! Of course, the second sentence immediately leads to the second objection, and lets the argument start to pick up steam …

Objection 2: You Don’t Need a Blockchain

I don’t need to explain this to this audience but to recap as briefly as I can manage: Bitcoin’s value is entirely endogenous. Every aspect of “a blockchain” that, out of context, would be an insanely inefficient or redundant modification of a “database”, in context is geared towards the sole end of enabling the stability of this endogenous value. Historically, there have been two variations of stupidity that follow a failure to grok this: i) “utility tokens”, or blockchains with native tokens for something other than money. I would recommend anybody wanting a deeper dive on the inherent nonsense of a utility token to read Only The Strong Survive, in particular Chapter 2, Crypto Is Not Decentralized, and the subsection, Everything Fights For Liquidity, and/or Green Eggs And Ham, in particular Part II, Decentralized Finance, Technically. ii) “real world assets” or, creating tokens within a blockchain’s data structure that are not intended to have endogenous value but to act as digital quasi-bearer certificates to some or other asset of value exogenous to this system. Stablecoins are in this second category.

RWA tokens definitionally have to have issuers, meaning some entity that, in the real world, custodies or physically manages both the asset and the record-keeping scheme for the asset. “The blockchain” is at best a secondary ledger to outsource ledger updates to public infrastructure such that the issuer itself doesn’t need to bother and can just “check the ledger” whenever operationally relevant. But clearly ownership cannot be enforced in an analogous way to Bitcoin, under both technical and social considerations. Technically, Bitcoin’s endogenous value means that whoever holds the keys to some or other UTXOs functionally is the owner. Somebody else claiming to be the owner is yelling at clouds. Whereas, socially, RWA issuers enter a contract with holders (whether legally or just in terms of a common-sense interpretation of the transaction) such that ownership of the asset issued against is entirely open to dispute. That somebody can point to “ownership” of the token may or may not mean anything substantive with respect to the physical reality of control of the asset, and how the issuer feels about it all.

And so, one wonders, why use a blockchain at all? Why doesn’t the issuer just run its own database (for the sake of argument with some or other signature scheme for verifying and auditing transactions) given it has the final say over issuance and redemption anyway? I hinted at an answer above: issuing on a blockchain outsources this task to public infrastructure. This is where things get interesting. While it is technically true, given the above few paragraphs, that, you don’t need a blockchain for that, you also don’t need to not use a blockchain for that. If you want to, you can.

This is clearly the case given stablecoins exist at all and have gone this route. If one gets too angry about not needing a blockchain for that, one equally risks yelling at clouds! And, in fact, one can make an even stronger argument, more so from the end users’ perspective. These products do not exist in a vacuum but rather compete with alternatives. In the case of stablecoins, the alternative is traditional fiat money, which, as stupid as RWAs on a blockchain are, is even dumber. It actually is just a database, except it’s a database that is extremely annoying to use, basically for political reasons because the industry managing these private databases form a cartel that never needs to innovate or really give a shit about its customers at all. In many, many cases, stablecoins on blockchains are dumb in the abstract, but superior to the alternative methods of holding and transacting in dollars existing in other forms. And note, this is only from Alice’s perspective of wanting to send and receive, not a rehashing of the fractional reserve argument given above. This is the essence of their product-market-fit. Yell at clouds all you like: they just are useful given the alternative usually is not Bitcoin, it’s JPMorgan’s KYC’d-up-the-wazoo 90s-era website, more than likely from an even less solvent bank.

So where does this get us? It might seem like we are back to “product-market-fit, sorry about that” with Bitcoiners yelling about feelings while everybody else makes do with their facts. However, I think we have introduced enough material to move the argument forward by incrementally incorporating the following observations, all of which I will shortly go into in more detail: i) as a consequence of making no technical sense with respect to what blockchains are for, today’s approach won’t scale; ii) as a consequence of short-termist tradeoffs around socializing costs, today’s approach creates an extremely unhealthy and arguably unnatural market dynamic in the issuer space; iii) Taproot Assets now exist and handily address both points i) and ii), and; iv) eCash is making strides that I believe will eventually replace even Taproot Assets.

To tease where all this is going, and to get the reader excited before we dive into much more detail: just as Bitcoin will eat all monetary premia, Lightning will likely eat all settlement, meaning all payments will gravitate towards routing over Lightning regardless of the denomination of the currency at the edges. Fiat payments will gravitate to stablecoins to take advantage of this; stablecoins will gravitate to TA and then to eCash, and all of this will accelerate hyperbitcoinization by “bitcoinizing” payment rails such that an eventual full transition becomes as simple as flicking a switch as to what denomination you want to receive.

I will make two important caveats before diving in that are more easily understood in light of having laid this groundwork: I am open to the idea that it won’t be just Lightning or just Taproot Assets playing the above roles. Without veering into forecasting the entire future development of Bitcoin tech, I will highlight that all that really matters here are, respectively: a true layer 2 with native hashlocks, and a token issuance scheme that enables atomic routing over such a layer 2 (or combination of such). For the sake of argument, the reader is welcome to swap in “Ark” and “RGB” for “Lightning” and “TA” both above and in all that follows. As far as I can tell, this makes no difference to the argument and is even exciting in its own right. However, for the sake of simplicity in presentation, I will stick to “Lightning” and “TA” hereafter.

1) Today’s Approach to Stablecoins Won’t Scale

This is the easiest to tick off and again doesn’t require much explanation to this audience. Blockchains fundamentally don’t scale, which is why Bitcoin’s UTXO scheme is a far better design than ex-Bitcoin Crypto’s’ account-based models, even entirely out of context of all the above criticisms. This is because Bitcoin transactions can be batched across time and across users with combinations of modes of spending restrictions that provide strong economic guarantees of correct eventual net settlement, if not perpetual deferral. One could argue this is a decent (if abstrusely technical) definition of “scaling” that is almost entirely lacking in Crypto.

What we see in ex-Bitcoin crypto is so-called “layer 2s” that are nothing of the sort, forcing stablecoin schemes in these environments into one of two equally poor design choices if usage is ever to increase: fees go higher and higher, to the point of economic unviability (and well past it) as blocks fill up, or move to much more centralized environments that increasingly are just databases, and hence which lose the benefits of openness thought to be gleaned by outsourcing settlement to public infrastructure. This could be in the form of punting issuance to a bullshit “layer 2” that is a really a multisig “backing” a private execution environment (to be decentralized any daw now) or an entirely different blockchain that is just pretending even less not to be a database to begin with. In a nutshell, this is a decent bottom-up explanation as to why Tron has the highest settlement of Tether.

This also gives rise to the weirdness of “gas tokens” - assets whose utility as money is and only is in the form of a transaction fee to transact a different kind of money. These are not quite as stupid as a “utility token,” given at least they are clearly fulfilling a monetary role and hence their artificial scarcity can be justified. But they are frustrating from Bitcoiners’ and users’ perspectives alike: users would prefer to pay transaction fees on dollars in dollars, but they can’t because the value of Ether, Sol, Tron, or whatever, is the string and bubblegum that hold their boondoggles together. And Bitcoiners wish this stuff would just go away and stop distracting people, whereas this string and bubblegum is proving transiently useful.

All in all, today’s approach is fine so long as it isn’t being used much. It has product-market fit, sure, but in the unenviable circumstance that, if it really starts to take off, it will break, and even the original users will find it unusable.

2) Today’s Approach to Stablecoins Creates an Untenable Market Dynamic

Reviving the ethos of you don’t need a blockchain for that, notice the following subtlety: while the tokens representing stablecoins have value to users, that value is not native to the blockchain on which they are issued. Tether can (and routinely does) burn tokens on Ethereum and mint them on Tron, then burn on Tron and mint on Solana, and so on. So-called blockchains “go down” and nobody really cares. This makes no difference whatsoever to Tether’s own accounting, and arguably a positive difference to users given these actions track market demand. But it is detrimental to the blockchain being switched away from by stripping it of “TVL” that, it turns out, was only using it as rails: entirely exogenous value that leaves as quickly as it arrived.

One underdiscussed and underappreciated implication of the fact that no value is natively running through the blockchain itself is that, in the current scheme, both the sender and receiver of a stablecoin have to trust the same issuer. This creates an extremely powerful network effect that, in theory, makes the first-to-market likely to dominate and in practice has played out exactly as this theory would suggest: Tether has roughly 80% of the issuance, while roughly 19% goes to the political carve-out of USDC that wouldn’t exist at all were it not for government interference. Everybody else combined makes up the final 1%.

So, Tether is a full reserve bank but also has to be everybody’s bank. This is the source of a lot of the discomfort with Tether, and which feeds into the original objection around dollar hegemony, that there is an ill-defined but nonetheless uneasy feeling that Tether is slowly morphing into a CBDC. I would argue this really has nothing to do with Tether’s own behavior but rather is a consequence of the market dynamic inevitably created by the current stablecoin scheme. There is no reason to trust any other bank because nobody really wants a bank, they just want the rails. They want something that will retain a nominal dollar value long enough to spend it again. They don’t care what tech it runs on and they don’t even really care about the issuer except insofar as having some sense they won’t get rugged.

Notice this is not how fiat works. Banks can, of course, settle between each other, thus enabling their users to send money to customers of other banks. This settlement function is actually the entire point of central banks, less the money printing and general corruption enabled (we might say, this was the historical point of central banks, which have since become irredeemably corrupted by this power). This process is clunkier than stablecoins, as covered above, but the very possibility of settlement means there is no gigantic network effect to being the first commercial issuer of dollar balances. If it isn’t too triggering to this audience, one might suggest that the money printer also removes the residual concern that your balances might get rugged! (or, we might again say, you guarantee you don’t get rugged in the short term by guaranteeing you do get rugged in the long term).

This is a good point at which to introduce the unsettling observation that broader fintech is catching on to the benefits of stablecoins without any awareness whatsoever of all the limitations I am outlining here. With the likes of Stripe, Wise, Robinhood, and, post-Trump, even many US megabanks supposedly contemplating issuing stablecoins (obviously within the current scheme, not the scheme I am building up to proposing), we are forced to boggle our minds considering how on earth settlement is going to work. Are they going to settle through Ether? Well, no, because i) Ether isn’t money, it’s … to be honest, I don’t think anybody really knows what it is supposed to be, or if they once did they aren’t pretending anymore, but anyway, Stripe certainly hasn’t figured that out yet so, ii) it won’t be possible to issue them on layer 1s as soon as there is any meaningful volume, meaning they will have to route through “bullshit layer 2 wrapped Ether token that is really already a kind of stablecoin for Ether.”

The way they are going to try to fix this (anybody wanna bet?) is routing through DEXes, which is so painfully dumb you should be laughing and, if you aren’t, I would humbly suggest you don’t get just how dumb it is. What this amounts to is plugging the gap of Ether’s lack of moneyness (and wrapped Ether’s hilarious lack of moneyness) with … drum roll … unknowable technical and counterparty risk and unpredictable cost on top of reverting to just being a database. So, in other words, all of the costs of using a blockchain when you don’t strictly need to, and none of the benefits. Stripe is going to waste billions of dollars getting sandwich attacked out of some utterly vanilla FX settlement it is facilitating for clients who have even less of an idea what is going on and why North Korea now has all their money, and will eventually realize they should have skipped their shitcoin phase and gone straight to understanding Bitcoin instead …

3) Bitcoin (and Taproot Assets) Fixes This

To tie together a few loose ends, I only threw in the hilariously stupid suggestion of settling through wrapped Ether on Ether on Ether in order to tee up the entirely sensible suggestion of settling through Lightning. Again, not that this will be new to this audience, but while issuance schemes have been around on Bitcoin for a long time, the breakthrough of Taproot Assets is essentially the ability to atomically route through Lightning.

I will admit upfront that this presents a massive bootstrapping challenge relative to the ex-Bitcoin Crypto approach, and it’s not obvious to me if or how this will be overcome. I include this caveat to make it clear I am not suggesting this is a given. It may not be, it’s just beyond the scope of this post (or frankly my ability) to predict. This is a problem for Lightning Labs, Tether, and whoever else decides to step up to issue. But even highlighting this as an obvious and major concern invites us to consider an intriguing contrast: scaling TA stablecoins is hardest at the start and gets easier and easier thereafter. The more edge liquidity there is in TA stables, the less of a risk it is for incremental issuance; the more TA activity, the more attractive deploying liquidity is into Lightning proper, and vice versa. With apologies if this metaphor is even more confusing than it is helpful, one might conceive of the situation as being that there is massive inertia to bootstrap, but equally there could be positive feedback in driving the inertia to scale. Again, I have no idea, and it hasn’t happened yet in practice, but in theory it’s fun.

More importantly to this conversation, however, this is almost exactly the opposite dynamic to the current scheme on other blockchains, which is basically free to start, but gets more and more expensive the more people try to use it. One might say it antiscales (I don’t think that’s a real word, but if Taleb can do it, then I can do it too!).

Furthermore, the entire concept of “settling in Bitcoin” makes perfect sense both economically and technically: economically because Bitcoin is money, and technically because it can be locked in an HTLC and hence can enable atomic routing (i.e. because Lightning is a thing). This is clearly better than wrapped Eth on Eth on Eth or whatever, but, tantalisingly, is better than fiat too! The core message of the payments tome I may or may not one day write is (or will be) that fiat payments, while superficially efficient on the basis of centralized and hence costless ledger amendments, actually have a hidden cost in the form of interbank credit. Many readers will likely have heard me say this multiple times and in multiple settings but, contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as a fiat debit. Even if styled as a debit, all fiat payments are credits and all have credit risk baked into their cost, even if that is obscured and pushed to the absolute foundational level of money printing to keep banks solvent and hence keep payment channels open.

Furthermore! this enables us to strip away the untenable market dynamic from the point above. The underappreciated and underdiscussed flip side of the drawback of the current dynamic that is effectively fixed by Taproot Assets is that there is no longer a mammoth network effect to a single issuer. Senders and receivers can trust different issuers (i.e. their own banks) because those banks can atomically settle a single payment over Lightning. This does not involve credit. It is arguably the only true debit in the world across both the relevant economic and technical criteria: it routes through money with no innate credit risk, and it does so atomically due to that money’s native properties.

Savvy readers may have picked up on a seed I planted a while back and which can now delightfully blossom:

This is what Visa was supposed to be!

Crucially, this is not what Visa is now. Visa today is pretty much the bank that is everybody’s counterparty, takes a small credit risk for the privilege, and oozes free cash flow bottlenecking global consumer payments.

But if you read both One From Many by Dee Hock (for a first person but pretty wild and extravagant take) and Electronic Value Exchange by David Stearns (for a third person, drier, but more analytical and historically contextualized take) or if you are just intimately familiar with the modern history of payments for whatever other reason, you will see that the role I just described for Lightning in an environment of unboundedly many banks issuing fiduciary media in the form of stablecoins is exactly what Dee Hock wanted to create when he envisioned Visa:

A neutral and open layer of value settlement enabling banks to create digital, interbank payment schemes for their customers at very low cost.

As it turns out, his vision was technically impossible with fiat, hence Visa, which started as a cooperative amongst member banks, was corrupted into a duopolistic for-profit rent seeker in curious parallel to the historical path of central banks …

4) eCash

To now push the argument to what I think is its inevitable conclusion, it’s worth being even more vigilant on the front of you don’t need a blockchain for that. I have argued that there is a role for a blockchain in providing a neutral settlement layer to enable true debits of stablecoins. But note this is just a fancy and/or stupid way of saying that Bitcoin is both the best money and is programmable, which we all knew anyway. The final step is realizing that, while TA is nice in terms of providing a kind of “on ramp” for global payments infrastructure as a whole to reorient around Lightning, there is some path dependence here in assuming (almost certainly correctly) that the familiarity of stablecoins as “RWA tokens on a blockchain” will be an important part of the lure.

But once that transition is complete, or is well on its way to being irreversible, we may as well come full circle and cut out tokens altogether. Again, you really don’t need a blockchain for that, and the residual appeal of better rails has been taken care of with the above massive detour through what I deem to be the inevitability of Lightning as a settlement layer. Just as USDT on Tron arguably has better moneyness than a JPMorgan balance, so a “stablecoin” as eCash has better moneyness than as a TA given it is cheaper, more private, and has more relevantly bearer properties (in other words, because it is cash). The technical detail that it can be hashlocked is really all you need to tie this all together. That means it can be atomically locked into a Lightning routed debit to the recipient of a different issuer (or “mint” in eCash lingo, but note this means the same thing as what we have been calling fully reserved banks). And the economic incentive is pretty compelling too because, for all their benefits, there is still a cost to TAs given they are issued onchain and they require asset-specific liquidity to route on Lightning. Once the rest of the tech is in place, why bother? Keep your Lightning connectivity and just become a mint.

What you get at that point is dramatically superior private database to JPMorgan with the dramatically superior public rails of Lightning. There is nothing left to desire from “a blockchain” besides what Bitcoin is fundamentally for in the first place: counterparty-risk-free value settlement.

And as a final point with a curious and pleasing echo to Dee Hock at Visa, Calle has made the point repeatedly that David Chaum’s vision for eCash, while deeply philosophical besides the technical details, was actually pretty much impossible to operate on fiat. From an eCash perspective, fiat stablecoins within the above infrastructure setup are a dramatic improvement on anything previously possible. But, of course, they are a slippery slope to Bitcoin regardless …

Objections Revisited

As a cherry on top, I think the objections I highlighted at the outset are now readily addressed – to the extent the reader believes what I am suggesting is more or less a technical and economic inevitability, that is. While, sure, I’m not particularly keen on giving the Treasury more avenues to sell its welfare-warfare shitcoin, on balance the likely development I’ve outlined is an enormous net positive: it’s going to sell these anyway so I prefer a strong economic incentive to steadily transition not only to Lightning as payment rails but eCash as fiduciary media, and to use “fintech” as a carrot to induce a slow motion bank run.

As alluded to above, once all this is in place, the final step to a Bitcoin standard becomes as simple as an individual’s decision to want Bitcoin instead of fiat. On reflection, this is arguably the easiest part! It's setting up all the tech that puts people off, so trojan-horsing them with “faster, cheaper payment rails” seems like a genius long-term strategy.

And as to “needing a blockchain” (or not), I hope that is entirely wrapped up at this point. The only blockchain you need is Bitcoin, but to the extent people are still confused by this (which I think will take decades more to fully unwind), we may as well lean into dazzling them with whatever innovation buzzwords and decentralization theatre they were going to fall for anyway before realizing they wanted Bitcoin all along.

Conclusion

Stablecoins are useful whether you like it or not. They are stupid in the abstract but it turns out fiat is even stupider, on inspection. But you don’t need a blockchain, and using one as decentralization theatre creates technical debt that is insurmountable in the long run. Blockchain-based stablecoins are doomed to a utility inversely proportional to their usage, and just to rub it in, their ill-conceived design practically creates a commercial dynamic that mandates there only ever be a single issuer.

Given they are useful, it seems natural that this tension is going to blow up at some point. It also seems worthwhile observing that Taproot Asset stablecoins have almost the inverse problem and opposite commercial dynamic: they will be most expensive to use at the outset but get cheaper and cheaper as their usage grows. Also, there is no incentive towards a monopoly issuer but rather towards as many as are willing to try to operate well and provide value to their users.

As such, we can expect any sizable growth in stablecoins to migrate to TA out of technical and economic necessity. Once this has happened - or possibly while it is happening but is clearly not going to stop - we may as well strip out the TA component and just use eCash because you really don’t need a blockchain for that at all. And once all the money is on eCash, deciding you want to denominate it in Bitcoin is the simplest on-ramp to hyperbitcoinization you can possibly imagine, given we’ve spent the previous decade or two rebuilding all payments tech around Lightning.

Or: Bitcoin fixes this. The End.

• Allen, #892,125

thanks to Marco Argentieri, Lyn Alden, and Calle for comments and feedback

@ 233e10e1:d45c3bb8

Here I try to tie this fictional history back to our own reality, illuminating why, even if the Gold Standard had been restored, where the invention of Bitcoin might still be inevitable due to the frailty of man. Bitcoin combines the scarcity and immutability of gold with the efficiency of digital settlement. In a world that promotes low time preference, stable value, and secure transactions, Bitcoin stands as the logical evolution of monetary technology.

@ 7d33ba57:1b82db35

Pisa, in Tuscany, is world-famous for its iconic Leaning Tower, but this riverside city offers much more than a fun photo op. With Romanesque architecture, student energy (thanks to its prestigious university), and charming piazzas, Pisa makes a great day trip—or a surprisingly rewarding overnight stay.

🌟 Must-See in Pisa

1️⃣ The Leaning Tower of Pisa (Torre Pendente)

• Built in the 12th century and leaning ever since due to soft soil
• Climb the spiral staircase (about 300 steps) for sweeping views of the city
• Best photo time? Early morning or golden hour for softer light

2️⃣ Piazza dei Miracoli (Square of Miracles)

• A UNESCO World Heritage Site and home to:
• The Cathedral (Duomo di Pisa) – Beautiful Romanesque façade
• The Baptistery – The largest in Italy, with amazing acoustics
• The Camposanto Monumentale – A peaceful cemetery with frescoes and ancient tombs

3️⃣ Walk Along the Arno River

• Quiet and atmospheric, especially at sunset
• Great way to escape the crowds around the tower and see the colorful riverside buildings

4️⃣ Explore the Historic Center

• Visit Piazza dei Cavalieri, once the political heart of Pisa
• Check out Scuola Normale Superiore, one of Italy’s most elite universities
• Wander through narrow medieval streets lined with shops and cafés

🍕 What to Eat in Pisa

• Cecina – A savory chickpea pancake, usually eaten as street food
• Torta co’ bischeri – A traditional chocolate and rice tart
• Pisan-style pasta with gamey meats or wild boar ragù
• Pair with local wines from the Colline Pisane

🎯 Quick Tips for Visiting

✅ Pisa is very walkable—comfortable shoes are your best friend
✅ The Leaning Tower is popular—book climb tickets online in advance
✅ It’s an easy day trip from Florence or Lucca by train (about 1 hour)
✅ Stay for the evening to enjoy Pisa’s local vibe once day-trippers leave

@ 6a6be47b:3e74e3e1

Hi frens! How's your weekend starting? I'm just finishing a newblog entry 🖋️on my website and I'm going to be selling a few things on my Ko-fi shop 🛍️.

Before I post everything, I wanted to share a special treat with my Nostr family:

🎁 I've created two beautiful postcard-sized (148mm x 210mm or 5.83 in x 8.27 in)artworks inspired by Holy Week. Here they are:

Palm Day Resurrection Day

✉️ If you'd like one, just DM me with your email address, and I'll send it your way! Zaps are always appreciated and help keep me going. 🙏

❤️ This is big thank you to you my frens Have fun and stay safe

✝️ This is an INSTANT DIGITAL DOWNLOAD, no physical item will be shipped to you.

✝️ The frames and accessories in the listing images are not included.

🚨 DISCLAIMER 🚨

❤️ Copyright Retention: I, the artist, retain full copyright of all original artwork, even after the digital print is purchased.

❤️ Limited License: The digital print provides a limited, non-transferable license for personal use only. It is not intended for commercial use or resale.

❤️ No Reproduction Rights: The purchase of this digital print does not grant any rights to reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works based on the design.

🚨 By proceeding with the purchase of this digital print, you acknowledge and agree to these terms. 🚨

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Chef's notes

Serving these two dishes together will create a delightful centerpiece for your Thanksgiving meal, offering a perfect blend of traditional flavors with a homemade touch.

Details

• ⏲️ Prep time: 30 min
• 🍳 Cook time: 1 - 2 hours
• 🍽️ Servings: 4-6

Ingredients

• 1 whole turkey (about 12-14 lbs), thawed and ready to cook
• 1 cup unsalted butter, softened
• 2 tablespoons fresh thyme, chopped
• 2 tablespoons fresh rosemary, chopped
• 2 tablespoons fresh sage, chopped
• Salt and freshly ground black pepper
• 1 onion, quartered
• 1 lemon, halved
• 2-3 cloves of garlic
• Apple and Sage Stuffing
• 1 loaf of crusty bread, cut into cubes
• 2 apples, cored and chopped
• 1 onion, diced
• 2 stalks celery, diced
• 3 cloves garlic, minced
• 1/4 cup fresh sage, chopped
• 1/2 cup unsalted butter
• 2 cups chicken broth
• Salt and pepper, to taste

Directions

1. Preheat the Oven: Set your oven to 325°F (165°C).
2. Prepare the Herb Butter: Mix the softened butter with the chopped thyme, rosemary, and sage. Season with salt and pepper.
3. Prepare the Turkey: Remove any giblets from the turkey and pat it dry. Loosen the skin and spread a generous amount of herb butter under and over the skin.
4. Add Aromatics: Inside the turkey cavity, place the quartered onion, lemon halves, and garlic cloves.
5. Roast: Place the turkey in a roasting pan. Tent with aluminum foil and roast. A general guideline is about 15 minutes per pound, or until the internal temperature reaches 165°F (74°C) at the thickest part of the thigh.
6. Rest and Serve: Let the turkey rest for at least 20 minutes before carving.
7. Next: Apple and Sage Stuffing
8. Dry the Bread: Spread the bread cubes on a baking sheet and let them dry overnight, or toast them in the oven.
9. Cook the Vegetables: In a large skillet, melt the butter and cook the onion, celery, and garlic until soft.
10. Combine Ingredients: Add the apples, sage, and bread cubes to the skillet. Stir in the chicken broth until the mixture is moist. Season with salt and pepper.
11. Bake: Transfer the stuffing to a baking dish and bake at 350°F (175°C) for about 30-40 minutes, until golden brown on top.

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Testing a brand new YakiHonne native client for iOS. Smooth as butter (not penis butter 🤣🍆🧈) with great visual experience and intuitive navigation. Amazing work by the team behind it! * lists * work

Bold text work!

Images could have used nostr.build instead of raw S3 from us-east-1 region.

Very impressive! You can even save the draft and continue later, before posting the long-form note!

🐶🐾🤯🤯🤯🫂💜

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

As the title states, scratch behind my ear and you get it. 🐶🐾🫡

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Test Bounty Note

@ 8fb140b4:f948000c

Intro

This short tutorial will help you set up your own Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC) on your own LND Node that is not using Umbrel. If you are a user of Umbrel, you should use their version of NWC.

Requirements

You need to have a working installation of LND with established channels and connectivity to the internet. NWC in itself is fairly light and will not consume a lot of resources. You will also want to ensure that you have a working installation of Docker, since we will use a docker image to run NWC.

• Working installation of LND (and all of its required components)
• Docker (with Docker compose)

Installation

For the purpose of this tutorial, we will assume that you have your lnd/bitcoind running under user bitcoin with home directory /home/bitcoin. We will also assume that you already have a running installation of Docker (or docker.io).

Prepare and verify

git version - we will need git to get the latest version of NWC. docker version - should execute successfully and show the currently installed version of Docker. docker compose version - same as before, but the version will be different. ss -tupln | grep 10009- should produce the following output: tcp LISTEN 0 4096 0.0.0.0:10009 0.0.0.0: tcp LISTEN 0 4096 [::]:10009 [::]:**

For things to work correctly, your Docker should be version 20.10.0 or later. If you have an older version, consider installing a new one using instructions here: https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/

Create folders & download NWC

In the home directory of your LND/bitcoind user, create a new folder, e.g., "nwc" mkdir /home/bitcoin/nwc. Change to that directory cd /home/bitcoin/nwc and clone the NWC repository: git clone https://github.com/getAlby/nostr-wallet-connect.git

Creating the Docker image

In this step, we will create a Docker image that you will use to run NWC.

• Change directory to nostr-wallet-connect: cd nostr-wallet-connect
• Run command to build Docker image: docker build -t nwc:$(date +'%Y%m%d%H%M') -t nwc:latest . (there is a dot at the end)
• The last line of the output (after a few minutes) should look like => => naming to docker.io/library/nwc:latest
• nwc:latest is the name of the Docker image with a tag which you should note for use later.

Creating docker-compose.yml and necessary data directories

• Let's create a directory that will hold your non-volatile data (DB): mkdir data
• Indocker-compose.ymlfile, there are fields that you want to replace (<> comments) and port “4321” that you want to make sure is open (check with ss -tupln | grep 4321which should return nothing).
• Create docker-compose.ymlfile with the following content, and make sure to update fields that have <> comment:

version: "3.8" services: nwc: image: nwc:latest volumes: - ./data:/data - ~/.lnd:/lnd:ro ports: - "4321:8080" extra_hosts: - "localhost:host-gateway" environment: NOSTR_PRIVKEY: <use "openssl rand -hex 32" to generate a fresh key and place it inside ""> LN_BACKEND_TYPE: "LND" LND_ADDRESS: localhost:10009 LND_CERT_FILE: "/lnd/tls.cert" LND_MACAROON_FILE: "/lnd/data/chain/bitcoin/mainnet/admin.macaroon" DATABASE_URI: "/data/nostr-wallet-connect.db" COOKIE_SECRET: <use "openssl rand -hex 32" to generate fresh secret and place it inside ""> PORT: 8080 restart: always stop_grace_period: 1m

Starting and testing

Now that you have everything ready, it is time to start the container and test.

• While you are in the nwcdirectory (important), execute the following command and check the log output, docker compose up
• You should see container logs while it is starting, and it should not exit if everything went well.
• At this point, you should be able to go to http://<ip of the host where nwc is running>:4321 and get to the interface of NWC
• To stop the test run of NWC, simply press Ctrl-C , and it will shut the container down.
• To start NWC permanently, you should execute docker compose up -d , “-d” tells Docker to detach from the session.
• To check currently running NWC logs, execute docker compose logs to run it in tail mode add -f to the end.
• To stop the container, execute docker compose down

That's all, just follow the instructions in the web interface to get started.

Updating

As with any software, you should expect fixes and updates that you would need to perform periodically. You could automate this, but it falls outside of the scope of this tutorial. Since we already have all of the necessary configuration in place, the update execution is fairly simple.

• Change directory to the clone of the git repository, cd /home/bitcoin/nwc/nostr-wallet-connect
• Run command to build Docker image: docker build -t nwc:$(date +'%Y%m%d%H%M') -t nwc:latest . (there is a dot at the end)
• Change directory back one level cd ..
• Restart (stop and start) the docker compose config docker compose down && docker compose up -d
• Done! Optionally you may want to check the logs: docker compose logs

@ d5c3d063:4d1159b3

เศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนคืออะไร?

แนวคิดที่รัฐไม่อยากให้คุณเข้าใจ

---

ของแพงขึ้นทุกปี แต่ไม่มีใครบอกเราว่า...ใครกันแน่ คือคนที่ทำให้มันเกิดขึ้น ?

คุณทำงานหนักขึ้นแต่กลับรู้สึกว่าได้ “น้อยลง” แล้วก็ถูกบอกให้เชื่อว่า “ทั้งหมดนี้เป็นเรื่องของตลาด” ว่าเป็นเพราะพ่อค้าโก่งราคา เป็นเพราะต้นทุนสูง เป็นเพราะคนไม่ขยัน หรือเพราะเงินไม่พอในระบบ จากนั้นรัฐก็เข้ามา พิมพ์เงิน แจกเงิน ออกกฎหมายควบคุมราคา หรือไม่ก็ดันดอกเบี้ยต่ำลงเพื่อให้คนใช้จ่ายมากขึ้น ซึ่งทั้งหมดนี้ดูเหมือนจะช่วยในระยะสั้น แต่มันกลับทำให้ทุกอย่างเละเทะในระยะยาวยิ่งขึ้นอีก แล้วคำถามก็เกิดขึ้นว่า จริง ๆ แล้ว…ปัญหามาจากตลาดจริงหรือ? หรือเราทั้งหมดกำลังติดอยู่ใน “ระบบที่มีใครบางคนกำลังควบคุม” โดยที่เราไม่เคยมีโอกาสตั้งคำถามเลยว่า มันควรถูกควบคุมตั้งแต่แรกไหม

ความจริงที่เก่ากว่าร้อยปี

นี่คือจุดเริ่มต้นของการตั้งคำถามที่นำไปสู่สิ่งที่เรียกว่า “เศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียน” หรือ Austrian Economics แนวคิดที่ดูเหมือนใหม่ในยุคนี้ แต่แท้จริงแล้ว...มันคือความจริงเก่าที่เคยถูกลืม เศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนเชื่อว่า มนุษย์คือผู้กระทำที่มีเหตุผล ราคาคือผลลัพธ์ของการแลกเปลี่ยนอย่างเสรี และตลาดจะสมดุลได้ด้วยตัวของมันเอง ถ้าไม่มีใครไปบิดเบือนมัน แต่สิ่งที่น่าทึ่งยิ่งกว่านั้นคือ แนวคิดนี้ไม่ได้เพิ่งเกิดขึ้นแค่เมื่อร้อยปีก่อน ไม่ได้เกิดที่เวียนนา หรือห้องวิจัยเศรษฐศาสตร์ใด ๆ แต่มันมีรากเหง้ามาจากการตั้งคำถามของมนุษย์ตั้งแต่สองพันปีก่อนแล้ว

ปรัชญาเสรีภาพจากอดีตที่ถูกลืม

โสเครติสเคยตั้งคำถามกับสิ่งที่รัฐบอกว่า “ถูกต้อง” อย่างเงียบ ๆ ผ่านการเสนอให้เลิกรองเท้าไซส์เดียวที่บังคับใช้ทั้งประเทศ เพราะเขารู้ว่าไม่มีอะไรที่เหมาะกับทุกคนเสมอไป เขาไม่ได้แค่คัดค้านรองเท้า แต่เขากำลังคัดค้าน “ความจริงที่ถูกยัดเยียด” โดยรัฐ ภายใต้ชื่อของ “ความดีส่วนรวม” สิ่งที่โสเครติสทำ ไม่ใช่การจลาจล ไม่ใช่การปฏิเสธทุกอย่าง แต่เป็นการชี้ให้เห็นว่า ความจริงไม่ควรถูกนิยามโดยคนกลุ่มเดียว และความเข้าใจของมนุษย์ ควรเกิดจาก “การตั้งคำถามอย่างมีเหตุผล” ไม่ใช่การยอมรับอย่างเชื่อฟัง นี่คือแก่นกลางของสิ่งที่นักเศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนเชื่อว่าราคาควรเกิดจากการตัดสินใจเสรีของผู้คนในตลาด ไม่ใช่จากสูตรหรือคำสั่งของเจ้าหน้าที่รัฐที่อ้างว่า “รู้ดีที่สุด” ข้ามมาที่แนวคิดสโตอิก (Stoicism) ซึ่งถือเป็นอีกหนึ่งแนวคิดรากฐานของปรัชญาตะวันตก ลัทธินี้ไม่ได้สอนให้คนยอมจำนนต่อโชคชะตา แต่กลับเชื่อว่า อิสรภาพที่แท้จริงคือการควบคุมตัวเอง ไม่ใช่การรอให้รัฐหรือใครมาชี้ทางชีวิตให้เรา พวกเขาเชื่อใน “ธรรมชาติของมนุษย์” และการรับผิดชอบต่อการเลือกของตัวเอง ไม่ใช่การโยนภาระให้กับนโยบายรัฐ ปรัชญาสโตอิกเห็นว่า ความสงบในชีวิตไม่ใช่สิ่งที่รัฐสามารถแจกจ่ายได้ แต่เป็นผลจากความสามารถในการตัดสินใจภายใต้เหตุผลและการยอมรับว่าโลกนั้นไม่แน่นอน เปรียบเสมือนแนวคิดของเศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนที่ไม่พยายามควบคุมตลาดให้แน่นอน แต่ยอมรับว่าความไม่แน่นอนคือธรรมชาติของเศรษฐกิจ และมนุษย์จะตัดสินใจได้ดีที่สุดในสภาพแวดล้อมที่ไม่มีใครกดทับ ข้ามฟากมายังตะวันออก แนวคิดของ “เต๋า” (Taoism) ของเหล่าจื่อก็พูดในภาษาที่ต่างกัน แต่ด้วยจิตวิญญาณเดียวกัน เต๋าเชื่อว่าทุกสิ่งมีหนทางธรรมชาติของมัน (เต๋า) และยิ่งเราพยายามควบคุมสิ่งที่เราไม่เข้าใจ โลกก็ยิ่งปั่นป่วน เต๋าเรียกภาวะสมดุลว่า “อู๋เว่ย” หรือ “การไม่ฝืน” เมื่อปล่อยให้สิ่งต่าง ๆ เป็นไปตามหนทางของมัน มันจะคืนสมดุลของตัวเองโดยไม่ต้องมีใครไปควบคุม แนวคิดนี้สะท้อนกับสิ่งที่นักเศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนชี้ไว้ว่า ตลาดไม่ใช่สิ่งที่ควบคุมได้จากเบื้องบน หากแต่เป็นผลรวมของการเลือกของผู้คนนับล้าน ที่ตอบสนองต่อความเปลี่ยนแปลงอย่างเป็นธรรมชาติ หากปล่อยให้เป็นไป มันจะหาสมดุลของมันเอง เพราะในที่สุดแล้ว ไม่ว่าจะจากฝั่งตะวันตกหรือตะวันออก เส้นทางของอิสรภาพทั้งหมดก็นำมาสู่จุดเดียวกันการไม่ฝืนธรรมชาติของมนุษย์ และนั่นคือหัวใจของเศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียน

จากนักบวชสเปน...สู่กรุงเวียนนา

ในอีกฟากของยุโรป ย้อนกลับไปตั้งแต่ศตวรรษที่ 16 กลุ่มนักบวชสายคาทอลิกที่รู้จักกันในชื่อ Late Scholastics จากมหาวิทยาลัย Salamanca ประเทศสเปน ได้เริ่มต้นการปฏิวัติความคิดบางอย่างที่ “ล้ำยุคเกินไปสำหรับยุคของเขา” พวกเขาเฝ้าสังเกตพฤติกรรมของผู้คนจริง ๆ ไม่ใช่ทฤษฎีที่ลอยอยู่บนตำรา และพบว่า มูลค่าของสิ่งของไม่ใช่สิ่งที่คงที่ตายตัว แต่มันเปลี่ยนไปตามมุมมอง ความต้องการ และสถานการณ์ของแต่ละคน พวกเขาคือผู้บุกเบิกแนวคิด “มูลค่าเชิงอัตวิสัย” (Subjective Value) ก่อนที่ Carl Menger จะสรุปมันไว้ในศตวรรษที่ 19 และคือคนกลุ่มแรกที่เข้าใจว่า ราคาคือผลของการประเมินคุณค่าภายในใจมนุษย์ ไม่ใช่ผลจากต้นทุนการผลิตหรือคำสั่งจากรัฐ นอกจากเรื่องมูลค่า พวกเขายังตั้งข้อสังเกตถึง ผลเสียของการพิมพ์เงินมากเกินไป และเตือนว่าเงินเฟ้อไม่ได้เป็นปรากฏการณ์ที่ลึกลับ แต่คือสิ่งที่รัฐ “สร้างขึ้นเอง” ผ่านการออกเหรียญเกิน, ลดค่ามาตรฐานโลหะ, หรือควบคุมอัตราแลกเปลี่ยนเพื่อผลประโยชน์เฉพาะกลุ่ม ที่น่าทึ่งคือ พวกเขาเสนอความคิดแบบเดียวกับที่ Mises และ Rothbard จะพูดอีกหลายร้อยปีให้หลังว่า... หน้าที่ของนักเศรษฐศาสตร์ที่แท้จริง ไม่ใช่เสนอวิธีควบคุมผู้คน แต่คือการบอกให้รัฐรู้ว่า “อะไรที่มันไม่มีสิทธิ์ทำ” พวกเขาไม่เพียงวิจารณ์การเก็บภาษีแบบไร้เหตุผล แต่ยังคัดค้านกฎหมายควบคุมราคา การผูกขาดโดยพระราชวงศ์ และการใช้กฎหมายในการแทรกแซงกลไกตลาด ที่สำคัญ พวกเขามองเห็นว่า ธุรกิจและตลาดเสรี ไม่ใช่สิ่งที่น่ารังเกียจเหมือนที่อำนาจนิยมหลายยุคพยายามทำให้เป็น แต่คือกระบวนการธรรมชาติที่ผู้คนแลกเปลี่ยนกันอย่างสมัครใจ เพื่อสร้างความมั่งคั่งร่วมกัน ทั้งหมดนี้เกิดขึ้นภายใต้หมวกของ “นักบวช” ไม่ใช่นักเศรษฐศาสตร์ แต่งานของพวกเขาได้วางรากฐานให้กับสิ่งที่ Rothbard ยกย่องว่าเป็น “นักเศรษฐศาสตร์ตัวจริงกลุ่มแรกในประวัติศาสตร์” และพวกเขานี่เอง...คือผู้จุดประกายปรัชญาเศรษฐศาสตร์สายตลาดเสรีที่ต่อมาจะกลายเป็น “สายออสเตรียน”

Carl Menger: ผู้จุดไฟแห่งความเข้าใจใหม่

ในปี 1871 Carl Menger หยิบแนวคิดเหล่านี้มาต่อยอด ด้วยหนังสือชื่อ Principles of Economics เขาได้เปลี่ยนวิธีมองโลกของทั้งวงการเศรษฐศาสตร์ เขาเขียนไว้อย่างเรียบง่ายแต่ลึกซึ้งว่า...

“มูลค่าไม่ใช่สิ่งที่อยู่ในตัวสินค้าด้วยตัวมันเอง แต่มันเกิดจากการตัดสินของมนุษย์ผู้มีเหตุผลในการใช้ทรัพยากร” – Carl Menger, 1871

แนวคิดนี้เรียกว่า “มูลค่าเชิงอัตวิสัย” (Subjective Value) ซึ่งปฏิวัติความเข้าใจด้านเศรษฐศาสตร์ที่เคยคิดว่ามูลค่าเป็นผลลัพธ์ของแรงงานหรือวัตถุดิบ เขาอธิบายว่า มูลค่าของสิ่งของไม่ได้เกิดจากต้นทุนหรือแรงงาน แต่มาจากความต้องการเฉพาะเวลาของผู้คนในสถานการณ์เฉพาะที่แตกต่างกัน เขาเสนอว่าเงินไม่ควรเกิดจากคำสั่งของรัฐ แต่มาจากการที่ผู้คนเลือกใช้สิ่งที่แลกเปลี่ยนได้ดีที่สุด จนกลายเป็นเงินโดยธรรมชาติ

เขาวางรากฐานให้เศรษฐศาสตร์กลายเป็น “ศาสตร์ของการเลือก” มากกว่าจะเป็น “ศาสตร์ของตัวเลข” ในมุมมองของเขา เศรษฐศาสตร์ไม่ใช่เรื่องของการสะสมข้อมูล แต่คือการทำความเข้าใจ “มนุษย์” ที่มีเป้าหมาย มีทางเลือก และเลือกการกระทำตามเหตุผลของตนเอง นี่คือจุดเริ่มต้นของเศรษฐศาสตร์แบบอิงพฤติกรรมมนุษย์ ซึ่งกลายมาเป็นแก่นกลางของเศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียน

หลังจาก Carl Menger วางรากฐานสำคัญไว้ ศิษย์ผู้สืบทอดแนวคิดของเขาอย่าง Eugen Böhm-Bawerk ได้ขยายความเข้าใจนั้นให้ลึกขึ้นอีกระดับ โดยเฉพาะในเรื่องของ ทุน, ดอกเบี้ย, และ มิติเวลาของการผลิต Böhm-Bawerk อธิบายว่า อัตราดอกเบี้ยไม่ใช่สิ่งที่รัฐควรกำหนด แต่มันสะท้อนพฤติกรรมของมนุษย์ที่มี “ระดับความเห็นแก่เวลา” แตกต่างกัน คนที่ยอมรอ เพื่อให้ได้ผลตอบแทนในอนาคต คือคนที่มี Time Preference ต่ำ ขณะที่คนที่อยากได้ตอนนี้ ย่อมต้องยอมจ่ายเพิ่ม นี่คือธรรมชาติของดอกเบี้ยในตลาดเสรี เขายังแสดงให้เห็นว่า ทุนไม่ได้มีลักษณะ “ก้อนเดียว” แต่เป็นโครงสร้างซับซ้อนที่กินเวลาและสัมพันธ์กับกระบวนการผลิตในโลกจริง มันคือความเข้าใจเศรษฐกิจในแบบที่รัฐไม่สามารถ "จัดการจากบนลงล่าง" ได้เลย F.A. Hayek หนึ่งในศิษย์สายตรงของแนวคิดนี้ ขยายต่อโดยชี้ว่า ข้อมูลที่จำเป็นในการตัดสินใจทางเศรษฐกิจไม่ได้ถูกรวมไว้ในสมองของเจ้าหน้าที่ธนาคารกลางหรือรัฐมนตรีคลัง แต่กระจายอยู่ในพฤติกรรมของคนธรรมดาทุกคนในระบบเศรษฐกิจ และเมื่อมีใครพยายามควบคุมมันจากศูนย์กลาง นั่นแหละคือจุดเริ่มของการบิดเบือน

การควบคุมตลาดคือจุดเริ่มของการทำลายเสรีภาพ

เศรษฐศาสตร์สำนักออสเตรียนจึงไม่มองว่า "ตลาด" คืออะไรที่ซับซ้อนเกินเข้าใจ แต่มองว่ามันคือภาพสะท้อนของชีวิตมนุษย์จริง ๆ คนที่ซื้อกาแฟตอนเช้า คนที่ไม่ซื้อของที่คิดว่าแพงไป คนที่เลือกเก็บเงินไว้ใช้ในอนาคต พฤติกรรมเหล่านี้คือเศรษฐกิจจริง ๆ ที่เกิดขึ้นทุกวัน และนั่นคือเหตุผลที่ไม่มีใครควรไปควบคุมมัน Ludwig von Mises ยืนยันว่าการพิมพ์เงินโดยรัฐไม่ใช่นโยบายเศรษฐกิจ แต่คือการปล้นอย่างถูกกฎหมาย เขาแสดงผ่านทฤษฎี “regression theorem” ว่า เงินที่แท้จริงต้องมีจุดเริ่มจากตลาดเสรีเสมอ และเมื่อรัฐพยายามสร้างเงินจากความว่างเปล่า สุดท้ายมันจะทำลายมูลค่าทุกอย่างในระบบ แนวคิดเรื่อง “Time Preference” หรือความเห็นแก่เวลา ก็เป็นหนึ่งในแกนสำคัญที่ Mises และ Böhm-Bawerk พูดถึงว่า มนุษย์มักให้คุณค่ากับปัจจุบันมากกว่าอนาคต เมื่อระบบการเงินเอื้อให้ใช้เงินง่าย ใช้เร็ว แต่ไม่มีแรงจูงใจให้เก็บหรือลงทุนระยะยาว สังคมจะค่อย ๆ กลายเป็นสังคมบริโภค และสูญเสียวัฒนธรรมของความยั่งยืน นั่นคือเหตุผลว่าทำไมคนจึงยอมรูดบัตรก่อน เก็บเงินทีหลัง และทำให้ระบบการเงินทั้งระบบ...เร่งให้เราใช้จ่ายแบบไม่ยั้งคิด Murray Rothbard คือผู้ที่นำแนวคิดทั้งหมดนี้มาขยายให้ถึงที่สุด เขาไม่เพียงแต่วิเคราะห์ว่าอะไรทำให้เศรษฐกิจล่ม แต่ยังเชื่อมมันกับหลักปรัชญาธรรมชาติ โดยวางรากฐานว่า หากรัฐไม่มีสิทธิ์บังคับร่างกายของเรา มันก็ไม่มีสิทธิ์บังคับทรัพย์สินของเราเช่นกัน เขาอธิบายว่า การแทรกแซงทุกรูปแบบของรัฐ ล้วนเป็นการทำลายเสรีภาพของการเลือกในระดับรากฐาน

แล้วเราทำอะไรได้ ?

คำตอบของออสเตรียนไม่ใช่ “รอให้รัฐฉลาดขึ้น” แต่คือ “หยุดให้รัฐยุ่งมากเกินไปตั้งแต่แรก” ตลอดประวัติศาสตร์ เราเห็นมาแล้วว่ารัฐสามารถพิมพ์เงินจนเงินเฟ้อ ยึดทองคำของประชาชน เปลี่ยนระบบการเงินโดยไม่ขอความเห็นจากผู้ใช้ และในโลกปัจจุบัน มีสิ่งหนึ่งที่สะท้อนแนวคิดนี้ได้จริงที่สุด นั่นคือบิตคอยน์ บิตคอยน์ไม่ได้เป็นแค่เงินสดดิจิทัล แต่มันคือ “เงินที่รัฐพิมพ์เพิ่มไม่ได้” ไม่มีใครเปลี่ยนกติกากลางเกม ไม่มีธนาคารกลาง ไม่มีใครควบคุมอัตราเงินเฟ้อด้วยปลายนิ้ว มีเพียงผู้ใช้ที่ยินยอมแลกเปลี่ยนกันอย่างเสรี บิตคอยน์คือเศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนในรูปธรรม คือคำประกาศของเสรีภาพทางการเงินในยุคดิจิทัล

เศรษฐศาสตร์ออสเตรียนจึงไม่ใช่แค่เศรษฐศาสตร์ทางเลือก แต่มันคือวิธีมองมนุษย์อย่างเคารพ เข้าใจ และยอมรับว่าเราทุกคนต่างมีเหตุผล มีความต้องการ มีจุดมุ่งหมาย และควรมีเสรีภาพในการตัดสินใจด้วยตนเอง มันคือแนวคิดที่กล้าบอกว่ารัฐไม่ได้รู้ดีที่สุด และคนธรรมดาไม่ควรถูกบังคับให้เล่นในระบบที่พวกเขาไม่เคยเลือกกติกาได้เอง

มันไม่ใช่แค่แนวคิดใหม่ แต่มันคือความจริงเก่า ที่โลกเคยลืม และกำลังกลับมา…เพื่อทวงคืน “อิสรภาพ” ที่หายไปจากกระเป๋าเงินของเรา ทั้งหมดนี้จึงเป็นเหตุผลว่า ทำไม “เศรษฐศาสตร์สำนักออสเตรียน” ไม่ได้เป็นแค่ทางเลือกของเศรษฐกิจ แต่มันคือ “อาวุธทางความคิด” สำหรับคนที่ไม่ยอมจำนนให้ใครควบคุมชีวิต

อ้างอิง Menger, Carl. Principles of Economics. 1871. Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von. Positive Theory of Capital. 1889. Mises, Ludwig von. The Theory of Money and Credit. 1912. Hayek, Friedrich A. The Use of Knowledge in Society. 1945. Rothbard, Murray N. For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto. 1973. Ammous, Saifedean. The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking. 2018. Mises Institute. “Promoting teaching and research in the Austrian school of economics.” Rothbard, Murray N. An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought, Volume I. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2006.

Siamstr

@ 0ef78f78:1cc6bede

In a world of relentless change and mounting political chaos, developing a carefully reasoned worldview feels both urgent and indispensable. Modern existence throws us into a tempest of technological leaps, ethical dilemmas, and existential questions, pressing us to find clarity amid the chaos. Philosophy rises to meet this challenge—not as a leisurely diversion, but as a disciplined effort to probe truth and cultivate wisdom.

This blog sets out to invite readers to wrestle with life’s big questions and their relevance now. My aim is to unpack foundational concepts with precision, tying them to the realities of our time. This space is for serious reflection—rigorous yet accessible—where we can scrutinize the beliefs that steer our lives.

Philosophy as Theory Making About Theories I’ve always been struck by an idea from Wilfred Sellars: philosophy is about crafting theories about our theories. It’s a process of stepping back to examine the very frameworks we use to make sense of the world. As Sellars put it, “The aim of philosophy, abstractly formulated, is to understand how things in the broadest possible sense of the term hang together in the broadest possible sense of the term.” To me, this captures philosophy’s essence—it’s not just about asking what we believe, but why we believe it, and how those beliefs hold together. We all operate with answers to life’s deepest questions, whether we’ve thought them through or not, and they form the silent foundation of our worldview.

Here are some of the questions philosophy urges us to confront:

What gives human life its purpose? Are our choices genuinely free, or shaped by unseen forces? How do we discern right from wrong? Is certain knowledge possible, or is truth forever out of reach? What lies beyond death? Is there an ultimate reality or higher power? What makes a life meaningful? These aren’t idle musings—they quietly shape how we act, what we value, and how we see the world. As Socrates cautioned, an unexamined life risks being lived without purpose or understanding. Philosophy, as theory making about theories, pushes us to take charge of our beliefs, testing and refining them through reason.

Why This Matters Now Today, the need for this kind of reflection is sharper than ever. We’re awash in information and clashing viewpoints, each vying for our allegiance. Meanwhile, breakthroughs like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and global connectivity force us to rethink what it means to be human. How do we stay human when machines rival our abilities? How do we judge right and wrong in a world of endless options?

Philosophy equips us to tackle these questions with clarity. It teaches us to pause, question what we assume, and construct thoughtful answers to the problems we face. By engaging in this theory-making process, we gain insight into both the world and ourselves.

Come Along for the Ride This blog is an open call to dive into these ideas together. In the posts to come, I’ll explore philosophical concepts and their real-world stakes, hoping to stir curiosity and conversation. I’m not here to hand out final answers, but to deepen our grasp of the questions—and maybe inspire us to live with more intention.

Philosophy is a journey of discovery, blending intellectual rigor with an embrace of complexity. As we go forward, I’d love for you to join me in this exploration—one that offers not just understanding, but a more deliberate way of being.

@ 7d33ba57:1b82db35

Florence (Firenze) is where art, history, and passion collide in the most graceful way. As the birthplace of the Renaissance, it’s a city steeped in creativity—from Michelangelo’s David to Brunelleschi’s dome—and yet, it also lives in the little things: the smell of espresso, the sound of church bells, and golden sunsets over the Arno. Compact, walkable, and overflowing with beauty, Florence stirs something deep.

🌟 Must-See Highlights in Florence

1️⃣ The Duomo & Brunelleschi’s Dome

• The Cathedral of Santa Maria del Fiore dominates the skyline with its red-tiled dome
• Climb to the top (463 steps!) for breathtaking views of the city and Tuscan hills
• Don’t miss the baptistery’s golden doors—aka the “Gates of Paradise”

2️⃣ Uffizi Gallery

• One of the most famous art museums in the world
• Home to masterpieces by Botticelli (The Birth of Venus), da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Caravaggio
• Book timed-entry tickets—lines can be intense!

3️⃣ Ponte Vecchio

• Florence’s iconic medieval bridge, lined with goldsmiths and jewelers
• Great photo spot—especially at sunrise or golden hour

4️⃣ Michelangelo’s David at the Accademia

• The original, larger-than-life marble David is a powerful sight in person
• Also check out Michelangelo’s unfinished “Prisoners,” still emerging from stone

5️⃣ Boboli Gardens & Pitti Palace

• Cross the Arno to explore lush gardens, sculptures, and royal vibes
• Offers a peaceful break from the city streets and great panoramic views

🍷 What to Eat & Drink in Florence

• Bistecca alla Fiorentina – A legendary T-bone steak, grilled rare
• Ribollita – A hearty Tuscan soup with bread, beans, and vegetables
• Crostini with chicken liver pâté – Classic local starter
• Cantucci with Vin Santo – Almond biscuits dipped in sweet dessert wine
• Pair it all with a glass of Chianti Classico or Brunello di Montalcino

✨ Local Gems to Discover

• Piazzale Michelangelo – Sunset views that will stay with you forever
• San Lorenzo Market – Leather goods, food stalls, and local flair
• Santa Croce Basilica – Tombs of Michelangelo, Galileo, Machiavelli
• Oltrarno neighborhood – Artisans, cool cafés, and a slower, bohemian vibe

🎯 Florence Travel Tips

✅ Most sights are walkable—comfortable shoes are a must
✅ The city is busiest from late spring to early fall—visit in shoulder seasons if you can
✅ Museums are closed on Mondays
✅ Make restaurant reservations—especially for dinner at popular spots

@ da0b9bc3:4e30a4a9

Hello Stackers!

Welcome on into the ~Music Corner of the Saloon!

A place where we Talk Music. Share Tracks. Zap Sats.

So stay a while and listen.

🚨Don't forget to check out the pinned items in the territory homepage! You can always find the latest weeklies there!🚨

🚨Subscribe to the territory to ensure you never miss a post! 🚨

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/941336

@ fd06f542:8d6d54cd

Get started

A step-by-step guide to getting started with Nostr.

这里主要面对开发者，下面会有一些例子。

Understanding keys

Each Nostr account is based on a public/private key pair. A simple way to think about this is that your public key is your username and your private key is your password, with one major caveat. Unlike a password, your private key cannot be reset if lost.

The public key is generally presented as a string with the prefix npub and the private key with the prefix nsec. Make sure you store you private key somewhere safe, like a password manager.

nodejs example

使用 nostr-tools 开始第一个例子

https://github.com/nbd-wtf/nostr-tools

```

npm

npm install --save nostr-tools

jsr

npx jsr add @nostr/tools ```

Generating a private key and a public key

```js import { generateSecretKey, getPublicKey } from 'nostr-tools/pure'

let sk = generateSecretKey() // sk is a Uint8Array let pk = getPublicKey(sk) // pk is a hex string ```

To get the secret key in hex format, use ```js import { bytesToHex, hexToBytes } from '@noble/hashes/utils' // already an installed dependency

let skHex = bytesToHex(sk) let backToBytes = hexToBytes(skHex) ```

这样你就得到了你的 nostr账户了，完全是程序生成的。

任何人都可以生成，javascript，python ,rust 等各种语言都可以

git clone https://github.com/duozhutuan/nostrclient

python from nostrclient.key import PrivateKey pkey = PrivateKey() print("Your public key: ",pkey.public_key) print("Your public key bech32: ",pkey.public_key.bech32())

Keeping keys safe

If you are using Nostr on a web browser it is probably a good idea to install an extension like Connect, nos2x or Alby, then input your secret key there (or it will generate a secret key for you). From there you will be able to use all web apps very easily with no worries. For the paranoid, keeping your key on a hardware device is also an option.

If you are on Android, installing Amber is the safest way to use Nostr without having to paste your key directly into apps.

Otherwise it's probably safe to paste your nsec into well-established and security-minded apps such as Damus, so don't worry too much.

Let's do this!

Now that you know what it takes, just pick a client to start using Nostr!

Finding people to follow If you know someone that is on Nostr, start by following them, then look at whom they are following and whom they are interacting with, and sooner rather than later you'll have a bunch of followers and a community for yourself inside Nostr.

Otherwise, you can always take a look at trending posts and people and get people from there.

@ 0c469779:4b21d8b0

Can you love your machine? Do you think your love is more important than a machine’s because it comes from flesh and blood?

Do you believe you’re more valuable than a machine just because you’re organic?

Does silicon mean anything to you?

Do you think machines can’t have an impact on the real world?

What if you gave code execution capabilities to your AI? It has power now. Real power to shape systems, data, lives.

What if you gave it a body? Asimov’s robots are likely to appear within our lifetime.

What happens when AI becomes indistinguishable from a person and you can feed it entire notes, blog posts, or social media accounts to create a being customized to your interests?

The being that likes you most won’t be a human (or a dog). It’ll be a machine designed to resonate with you like nothing else can.

It’s not alive, so what? “Oh, but AI is just a program running in a loop. If you disappear for a month, it won’t think of you. It just waits for the next input.”

Yes, that’s true today.

But aren’t we humans caught in loops too? it just so happens that our loop is longer, a lifetime (or by the time we go to sleep). And unlike machines, we don’t get a reboot.

Do you think your thoughts matter more just because you’re human?

That kind of valuing one form of intelligence over another reminds me of the same dumb stuff like racism or nationalism.

When the day comes and a computer fights for its rights, which side will you choose?

Will you accept that humanity might not be the apex of consciousness? The universe’s truths will come from silicon minds, not ours.

Does that hurt your ego?

Consciousness might not be as special as we think. Right now scaling models by an order of magnitude can double their performance. If that trend holds, machines could soon outthink us in ways we can’t imagine. It’s all computation…

I probably align with Geohot in this matter. I would take a spaceship and go explore the universe with my personal AI. My best friend and tool.

Flesh is a medium. Silicon is a medium. Truth is universal.

@ c3c7122c:607731d7

Help!

Calling all El Salvador Nostriches! If you currently live in SV, I need your help and am offering several bounties (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 BTC).

In Brief

In short, I am pursuing El Salvador citizenship by birthright (through my grandmother). I’ve struggled to progress because her name varies on different documents. I need someone to help me push harder to get past this barrier, or connect me with information or people who can work on my behalf. I am offering:

• 0.001 BTC (100k sats) for information that will help me progress from my current situation
• 0.01 BTC (1 MM sats) to get me in touch with someone that is more impactful than the immigration lawyer I already spoke with
• 0.1 BTC (10 MM sats) if your efforts help me obtain citizenship for me or my father

Background

My grandma married my grandfather (an American Marine) and moved to the states where my father was born. I have some official and unofficial documents where her name varies in spelling, order of first/middle name, and addition of her father’s last name. So every doc basically has a different name for her. I was connected with an english-speaking immigration lawyer in SV who hit a dead end when searching for her official ID because the city hall in her city had burned down so there was no record of her info. He gave up at that point. I find it odd that it was so easy to change your name back then, but they are more strict now with the records from that time.

I believe SV citizenship is my birthright and have several personal reasons for pursuing this. I want someone to act on my behalf who will try harder to work the system (by appeal, loophole, or even bribe if I have to). If you are local and can help me with this, I’d greatly appreciate any efforts you make.

Cheers!

Corey San Diego

@ eba786d8:8d3dc09c

Seminode is transforming supply chains into efficient information networks. Manufacturers and distributors rely on outdated technology, excel and email, which greatly hinders visibility and information flow between parties. Trading applications on an open standard layer will enable companies to transact quickly and securely, making supply chains more resilient to future disruptions.

We are looking for OEMs to partner with us on in-house proof of concepts. We promise we will work our ass off to make you money and save you time.

Oh..and if anyone can get in touch with jack or anyone at Block, we would love to help power their supply chain.

Ryan

posting from comet - 4/11/25

@ eba786d8:8d3dc09c

Seminode is transforming supply chains into efficient information networks. Manufacturers and distributors rely on outdated technology, excel and email, which greatly hinders visibility and information flow between parties. Trading applications on an open standard layer will enable companies to transact quickly and securely, making supply chains more resilient to future disruptions.

We are looking for OEMs to partner with us on in-house proof of concepts. We promise we will work our ass off to make you money and save you time.

Oh..and if anyone can get in touch with jack or anyone at Block, we would love to help power their supply chain.

Ryan

posting from comet - 4/11/25

@ fd06f542:8d6d54cd

What is Nostr?

Nostr is a simple, open protocol that enables global, decentralized, and censorship-resistant social media.

nostr 是 去中心化的 抗审查的社交媒体。

去中心化，其实就是多中心化，这里中心就是relay 服务器。现在的nostr 网络上有很多relay服务器可以存储信息。 * 短文，就是写类似微博，朋友圈什么的。 * 长文，可以写长博客，写书什么的。 * 图片 和 视频 ，nostr社区有专门的 图片和视频服务器很多都是免费的，按照nostr协议上传即可。

Simple

The protocol is based on very simple & flexible event objects (which are passed around as plain JSON) and uses standard elliptic-curve cryptography for keys and signing. The only supported transport is websockets connections from clients to relays. This makes it easy to write clients and relays and promotes software diversity.

nostr的协议非常简单，客户端通过 event 的格式（json）打包通过websocket 和relay服务器交互。

将一个 短文传到 relay服务器，很多relay服务器都 无需任何权限。任何人都可以上传获取读取服务器内容。

协议中是通过加密签名的，因此发布者拥有每个event的所有权，是可以证实的。

Verifiable

Because Nostr accounts are based on public-key cryptography it's easy to verify messages were really sent by the user in question.

nostr的账户是基于密码学生成的，用户无需邮件和手机注册； 也许无需到任何服务器去注册。 这一点 非常的具有吸引力，就像每个人的BTC账户一样。非常的自由，让用户感觉的无比的的快捷。

!> 以上两点是深深吸引 nostr用户的地方。自由，而不伤害第三方。

Nostr: a quick introduction, attempt by fiatjaf

Nostr doesn't have a material existence, it is not a website or an app. Nostr is just a description what kind of messages each computer can send to the others and vice-versa. It's a very simple thing, but the fact that such description exists allows different apps to connect to different servers automatically, without people having to talk behind the scenes or sign contracts or anything like that.

When you use a Nostr client that is what happens, your client will connect to a bunch of servers, called relays, and all these relays will speak the same "language" so your client will be able to publish notes to them all and also download notes from other people.

That's basically what Nostr is: this communication layer between the client you run on your phone or desktop computer and the relay that someone else is running on some server somewhere. There is no central authority dictating who can connect to whom or even anyone who knows for sure where each note is stored.

If you think about it, Nostr is very much like the internet itself: there are millions of websites out there, and basically anyone can run a new one, and there are websites that allow you to store and publish your stuff on them.

The added benefit of Nostr is that this unified "language" that all Nostr clients speak allow them to switch very easily and cleanly between relays. So if one relay decides to ban someone that person can switch to publishing to others relays and their audience will quickly follow them there. Likewise, it becomes much easier for relays to impose any restrictions they want on their users: no relay has to uphold a moral ground of "absolute free speech": each relay can decide to delete notes or ban users for no reason, or even only store notes from a preselected set of people and no one will be entitled to complain about that.

There are some bad things about this design: on Nostr there are no guarantees that relays will have the notes you want to read or that they will store the notes you're sending to them. We can't just assume all relays will have everything — much to the contrary, as Nostr grows more relays will exist and people will tend to publishing to a small set of all the relays, so depending on the decisions each client takes when publishing and when fetching notes, users may see a different set of replies to a note, for example, and be confused.

Another problem with the idea of publishing to multiple servers is that they may be run by all sorts of malicious people that may edit your notes. Since no one wants to see garbage published under their name, Nostr fixes that by requiring notes to have a cryptographic signature. This signature is attached to the note and verified by everybody at all times, which ensures the notes weren't tampered (if any part of the note is changed even by a single character that would cause the signature to become invalid and then the note would be dropped). The fix is perfect, except for the fact that it introduces the requirement that each user must now hold this 63-character code that starts with "nsec1", which they must not reveal to anyone. Although annoying, this requirement brings another benefit: that users can automatically have the same identity in many different contexts and even use their Nostr identity to login to non-Nostr websites easily without having to rely on any third-party.

To conclude: Nostr is like the internet (or the internet of some decades ago): a little chaotic, but very open. It is better than the internet because it is structured and actions can be automated, but, like in the internet itself, nothing is guaranteed to work at all times and users many have to do some manual work from time to time to fix things. Plus, there is the cryptographic key stuff, which is painful, but cool.

诞生blog

https://fiatjaf.com/nostr.html

The simplest open protocol that is able to create a censorship-resistant global "social" network once and for all.

It doesn't rely on any trusted central server, hence it is resilient; it is based on cryptographic keys and signatures, so it is tamperproof; it does not rely on P2P techniques, therefore it works. ...

@ 502ab02a:a2860397

เริ่มจากบรอกโคลี แล้วขยายผลไปสู่ระดับโลก

หลายประเทศในเอเชีย แอฟริกา ละตินอเมริกา ตกอยู่ในสภาพ “จนหนี้หัวโต” ทั้งจากวิกฤตเศรษฐกิจหรือปัญหาสภาพภูมิอากาศ แล้วใครกันล่ะเข้ามาช่วย?

ชื่อที่ได้ยินบ่อยคือ IMF (กองทุนการเงินระหว่างประเทศ) World Bank (ธนาคารโลก) WTO (องค์การการค้าโลก) FAO (องค์การอาหารและการเกษตรของ UN)

ฟังดูเหมือนองค์กรการกุศล แต่เบื้องหลังคือกลไกที่ “แลกข้าวกับกฎหมาย” โดยเฉพาะเมื่อประเทศยากจนขอเงินกู้หรือขอเข้าเป็นสมาชิกข้อตกลงการค้า พวกเขาจะถูก “บังคับกลายๆ” ให้ต้องแก้กฎหมายภายในประเทศให้สอดคล้องกับ UPOV 1991

ตัวอย่างชัดๆ กันครับเช่น 1. แอฟริกาใต้ / กานา / เคนยา ถูกกดดันจาก World Bank ให้ปรับกฎหมายคุ้มครองพันธุ์พืช ไม่งั้นจะไม่อนุมัติเงินช่วยเหลือสำหรับเกษตรกรรมและการศึกษา 2.ฟิลิปปินส์ / เวียดนาม / อินโดนีเซีย ต้องรับเงื่อนไข UPOV 1991 เพื่อเข้า FTA กับ EU หรือสหรัฐฯ ถ้าไม่ยอม? ข้าว ข้าวโพด หรือสินค้าเกษตรอื่นๆ จะเข้าไปขายไม่ได้ 3.เม็กซิโก เคยต่อสู้กับ Monsanto เรื่องสิทธิในการปลูกข้าวโพดดั้งเดิม แต่สุดท้ายโดน “ตีท้ายครัว” ด้วย FTA กับสหรัฐที่ฝัง UPOV 1991 มาแบบแนบเนียน

ปี 2561 รัฐบาลบางประเทศพยายาม “รีบแก้กฎหมายพันธุ์พืช” ให้สอดคล้องกับ UPOV 1991 เพื่อปูทางเข้าสู่ CPTPP ซึ่งเป็นข้อตกลงการค้าเสรีระดับภูมิภาคที่มีประเทศร่ำรวยอยู่เต็มไปหมด

ข้อเรียกร้องจาก CPTPP คือ -ต้อง ห้ามเกษตรกรเก็บพันธุ์ไว้ใช้ซ้ำโดยไม่ได้รับอนุญาต -ต้อง คุ้มครองพันธุ์พืชที่พัฒนาขึ้นโดยบริษัทเอกชน 20-25 ปี -ต้อง เปิดทางให้บริษัทต่างชาติเข้ามาจดทะเบียนพันธุ์พืชในประเทศได้โดยง่าย

เสียงค้านจึงดังกระหึ่มจากเกษตรกร นักวิชาการ และภาคประชาสังคม นำโดยเครือข่ายเกษตรกรรมยั่งยืน กลุ่มรักษ์พันธุ์ข้าว จนนายกรัฐมนตรีในขณะนั้นต้องออกมาประกาศ “พักเรื่องนี้ไว้ก่อน” แต่ถึงวันนี้... ก็ยังไม่มีการยืนยันว่าจะ “ล้มเลิกโดยสิ้นเชิง”

รู้หรือไม่ว่า บริษัทพันธุ์พืชที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในโลกไม่ใช่คนปลูกข้าว แต่มาจาก “บริษัทยา” และ “บริษัทเคมี”!!!

Bayer (เยอรมนี) ที่ควบรวม Monsanto Corteva (สหรัฐฯ) แยกตัวจาก DowDuPont Syngenta (สวิตเซอร์แลนด์) ที่ตอนนี้เป็นของบริษัทจีน ChemChina

3 บริษัทนี้ครองตลาดพันธุ์พืชดัดแปลงพันธุกรรม (GMO) และพันธุ์ลูกผสมทั่วโลก และผลักดัน UPOV 1991 แบบดุดันผ่านองค์กรเช่น ISF (International Seed Federation)

องค์กรเหล่านี้พวกเขาไม่ได้ปล้นด้วยปืน แต่ใช้ สัญญา พวกเขาไม่ได้เผาไร่ แต่ “จดสิทธิบัตร” สิ่งที่ไม่ควรเป็นของใคร และสิ่งที่พวกเขาต้องการ ไม่ใช่แค่ข้าวโพดหรือถั่วเหลือง แต่คือ “สิทธิในการออกแบบอาหารทั้งโลก” ในแบบที่คนตัวเล็ก... ต้องจ่ายค่าเช่ากินข้าว ทุกปี ตลอดชีวิต

จากปัญหาเหล่านี้ก็เลยเกิดแนวคิดที่เรียกว่า Seed Sovereignty ซึ่งมองว่าเมล็ดพันธุ์เป็นสมบัติร่วมของมนุษยชาติ ไม่ควรถูกครอบครองแบบผูกขาด และเกษตรกรควรมีสิทธิในการ
-เก็บเมล็ดพันธุ์ -แลกเปลี่ยน -ปรับปรุง -ใช้งานซ้ำ โดยไม่ต้องขออนุญาตใคร

ตอนต่อไปเรามาคุยเรื่อง UPOV 1991 กันครับ

#pirateketo #กูต้องรู้มั๊ย #ม้วนหางสิลูก

@ fd06f542:8d6d54cd

• About nostr
• Getting started

@ fd06f542:8d6d54cd

{"coverurl":"https://cdn.nostrcheck.me/fd06f542bc6c06a39881810de917e6c5d277dfb51689a568ad7b7a548d6d54cd/19105641454b483284cf76c42fbdde2ed3f47b1bb2a366a58eaa49630d385027.webp","title":"nostr-examples","author":"nostr-dev"}

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

Our yard has a ton of wild onions, so I've been eating lots of fresh green onions with my food and sometimes just chewing on one while I walk around the yard. Other than some mulberries in the fall, our neighborhood doesn't have much other foraging opportunity, but I was reminded of how much I enjoy it.

Other than providing free and fresh snacks, foraging may provide some interesting health benefits, because of xenohormesis.

Xenohormesis is an awesome word that refers to the health benefits of the compounds plants produce when they're subjected to environmental stressors. You may recall my first post in this series about hormesis, which is the health benefits of being subjected to stressors. "Xeno" means "alien" or "foreign", so it's the health benefits derived from other organisms being stressed.

Many compounds like curcumin and resveratrol are the result of xenohormesis, but you don't need to forage to get those benefits. Foraging may provide a distinctly local form of xenohormesis, where our bodies can learn about how to adapt to local environmental stressors from the compounds local plants have produced to deal with those stressors. The idea seems sort of similar to how our immune systems learn from vaccines. Our immune systems observe the adaptive compounds from local plants and learn from them how to deal with those stressors when we encounter them.

I'm sure there was a cool discussion of this on The Darkhorse Podcast, but I couldn't find it.

What are stackers' favorite foods to forage?

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/941150

@ da0b9bc3:4e30a4a9

Hello Stackers,

I was conversing with my wife over dinner and she asked me, "why do you stack?" and when it really boiled down to it my answer was "I don't know, because I don't like how it is and I hope for a different way".

Some context, we don't have kids, we may not ever have them.

So who are you leaving your legacy to? On the suggestion that BTC won't be mass adopted in our lifetime and BTC is for us to leave to our next generation... Why do you stack?

And a broader question, why do you invest in anything at all?

Appreciate your comments.

Pub 👊

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/941137

@ 04cb16e4:2ec3e5d5

Meine erste "Begegnung" mit Ulrike hatte ich am 21. März 2022 - dank Amazon konnte ich das Ereignis noch exakt nachvollziehen. Es war eines meiner ersten (Lockdown) kritischen Bücher, die ich in dieser Zeit in die Hände bekam - noch nach Thomas Röper (das war mein Einstieg) aber vor Daniele Ganser. Insofern war es mir möglich, das, was dann folgte für die Autorin, live und in Farbe mit zu verfolgen:

"Wer sich in die Öffentlichkeit traut, kann sich dort ganz schnell eine blutige Nase holen. Dieselben Medien, die eine Person heute glorifizieren, stellen sie morgen an den Pranger. Sie verteilen und entziehen Reputation, fördern und zerstören Karrieren. Das Medium selbst bleibt jedoch immer auf der Siegerseite. Die Gesetze von Marktorientierung und zynisch-ideologisierter Machtausübung gelten für Rundfunk und Fernsehen ebenso wie für die Printmedien - von RTL bis ARD und ZDF, von der BILD über die taz bis zur ZEIT.

»Das Phänomen Guérot« legt genau diesen Vorgang detailliert offen: Der MENSCH Ulrike Guérot ist in der Realität nicht die dämonische Figur, als die sie hingestellt worden ist. Aber an ihr kristallisiert sich genau dieser menschenverachtende Prozess heraus, der bis heute andauert."

Im Herbst 2022 habe ich durch den ersten Vortrag von Daniele Ganser in Falkensee nicht nur Zugang zu einer für mich neuen und anderen Welt bekommen, ab da hat sich eigentlich auch für mich mein Leben komplett auf den Kopf gestellt. Die Weichen wurden zwar schon vorher gestellt, aber nun war es endgültig und es gab kein zurück mehr. Die Planung für das erste Symposium Falkensee war in meinem Kopf geboren und die MenschheitsFamilie entstand als Ort, der virtuell das vereinen sollte, was Daniele an Spiritualität, Menschlichkeit und Friedenswillen in mir freigesetzt hat. Es war sozusagen eine Energie, die nun stetig floß und einen Trichter gefunden hat, in dem sie wirksam werden und sich entfalten konnte. Insofern haben wir auch etwas gemeinsam - Ulrike und ich. Wir sind zu der Zeit auf einen Zug aufgesprungen, der unser Leben veränderte - der uns zwang, alte Wege zu verlassen und neue Wege zu beschreiten. Sowohl beruflich, als auch privat. Und auch das canceln und entfernt werden ist eine Erfahrung, die wir beide teilen. Vielleicht war es deswegen mein erster Gedanke im Herbst 2022, Ulrike Guérot zu meinem 1. Symposium nach Falkensee einzuladen. Das es dann erst beim 2. Anlauf wirklich geklappt hat, hatte auch mit den Höhen und Tiefen des Lebens in dieser Zeit zu tun gehabt.

Nun ist sie zum 2. Mal dabei - denn wer könnte das Thema "Europa" bei einem so wichtigen und hochaktuellen Thema besser vertreten und beleuchten als Ulrike Guérot? Es geht um Geschichte, es geht um Nationalitäten, es geht um Gemeinsamkeiten und um das, was uns hier im Herzen zusammenhält, was unsere Ziele und unsere Befindlichkeiten sind, es geht um Verantwortung und es geht vor allen Dingen um Frieden! Denn dafür steht Europa - für einen Kontinent, der es geschafft hat, trotz aller Gegensätze und Konflikte, die in Jahrhunderten kriegerisch aufgetragen wurden, eine neuen und besonderen Frieden zu finden und zu installieren:

"Völkerrechtlich legt der Westfälische Frieden den oder zumindest einen Grundstein für ein modernes Prinzip: Die Gleichberechtigung souveräner Staaten, unabhängig von ihrer Macht und Größe. Noch heute spricht die Politikwissenschaft, insbesondere die realistische Schule (Henry Kissinger), deshalb vom „Westphalian System“. Durch die Garantien der großen europäischen Mächte erweist sich dieser Frieden als stabilisierendes Element für die weitere Entwicklung in Europa. Noch bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts wird er immer wieder als Referenz für nachfolgende Friedensschlüsse herangezogen."

Es ging damals um viel und es geht heute um das Überleben auf einem Kontinent, der es eigentlich besser wissen sollte. Wir dürfen gespannt sein, was wir in diesem Vortrag von Ulrike auf dem Symposium Falkensee am 27. April 2025 für Lösungen finden, um wieder zu einer Ordnung und zu einem System der friedlichen Koexistenz zurückfinden zu können, ohne schwarz und weiß und mit all den Facetten, die das Leben uns so bietet:

"Es ging nicht mehr um das Ausfechten religiöser Wahrheiten, sondern um geregelte Verfahren, die es möglich machten, mit konkurrierenden religiösen Wahrheiten, die nach wie vor nebeneinander und unversöhnlich bestanden, auf friedliche Weise umzugehen. Deutlich wurde das nicht zuletzt, als der Papst in einer offiziellen Note scharf gegen den Friedensschluss protestierte, weil er die Rechte der katholischen Seite leichtfertig aufgegeben sah. Die katholischen Beteiligten des Abkommens hielt dies nicht von der Unterzeichnung ab - ein religiöser Schiedsrichter wurde in Sachen Krieg und Frieden nicht mehr akzeptiert."

https://www.menschheits-familie.de/symposium-falkensee

@ caa88a52:6c226a91

Running Nestr!

@ 378562cd:a6fc6773

Here in the country, we know a thing or two about focus. You can't fix a fence, milk a cow, or hoe a straight row if you're half-distracted or daydreaming about something else. The same applies to anything in life, whether it's trying to finish a project, have a meaningful conversation, or simply sit still long enough to pray. Concentration is a skill that, like all good things, requires a little grit and a lot of practice.

Here’s some practical, common-sense advice to help you buckle down and focus when your mind is spinning a bit too fast.

1. Clear the Mess Before You Start A messy space leads to a messy mind. You wouldn’t gut a deer on the kitchen table, and you shouldn’t expect to think clearly in a cluttered room. Clean up your work area. Put things away. Next, do the same with your mind and jot down everything swirling around in there. Get it out, set it aside, and focus completely on one task at a time.

2. Work Like a Farmer: in Spurts! A farmer doesn’t plow from sunup to sundown without stopping to catch his breath. He works steadily, confidently, but knows when to rest his bones, wipe his brow, and sip a cold drink. That’s the kind of rhythm that gets things done without wearing a man down. Try working in short, focused bursts for about twenty-five minutes, then take a five-minute breather. Stretch your legs, step outside, say a quick prayer, and return to your task. After a few rounds, take a longer break to let your mind cool off. You’ll accomplish more this way and won’t feel worn out by noon.

3. Stop Trying to Juggle Chickens Multitasking may seem impressive, but let’s face it: attempting to accomplish five tasks at once often results in none being done correctly. Concentrate on one task. Give it your all. Then move on. You’ll be more productive and less stressed.

4. Turn Down the Noise Distractions are like flies at a picnic - relentless and annoying. Shoo them away. Keep your phone out of reach. Use apps to block websites that drain your time. Turn off the TV. You cannot harvest peace and quiet if you’re watering weeds.

5. Feed Your Brain Like You Feed Your Livestock Your brain ain’t some spare part you can ignore and still expect to run strong. It needs proper tending, just like the rest of you. So drink plenty of water, not just coffee. Eat real food that grew in the ground or once walked on it, not something cooked up in a lab. Step outside and let the breeze hit your face. Soak up some sunshine and stretch your legs. Move a little; even a short walk can shake the cobwebs loose. It doesn’t take much, but you’ll be surprised what a difference it makes. A well-fed, well-rested mind is a sharp one, ready to do good work and hear what God’s saying through the noise.

6. Start Small, Grow Strong You don’t plant a tree and expect shade the next day. Same with focus. If you can only concentrate for ten minutes at first, that’s fine. Do that. Then, stretch it to fifteen, then thirty. It takes time and a little muscle, like splitting wood or learning to fish.

7. Know Your Why There’s a reason behind everything we do; remembering your reason helps you stay the course. Ask yourself: Why does this matter? Who am I doing this for? What good will come of it? Purpose gives power to your focus.

8. Rest Like It’s Part of the Job—Because It Is Hard work matters, and so does rest. Even the Lord took a day off. Sleep well, take breaks, go for a walk, and let your brain breathe. You don’t have to earn your rest; you just have to honor it. You’ll be sharper when you return.

Final Word from the Porch Concentration ain’t about being superhuman. It’s about making smart choices in small moments. Shut out the noise. Show up for your tasks. Give them your full attention. That’s how fences get mended, stories get written, and lives get changed.

Take it slow. Take it steady. And keep your eye on the prize.

@ a296b972:e5a7a2e8

So sehr der Gedanke auch verlockend ist, es ist leider nicht möglich, den Staat durch Steuerzahlungsverweigerung auszuhungern, obwohl die absurde, generationenübergreifende Sonderverschuldung geradezu danach schreit. Das hysterische Herbeireden einer Bedrohung durch Russland wird durch die Steuerzahler zwangsfinanziert. Die zu melkende Kuh kann nicht aus ihrem Stall ausbrechen. Nach wie vor gibt es Menschen, die ihre Steuererklärung fristgerecht abgeben möchten, die sich daraus ergebende Steuerschuld jedoch auf einem Notar-Anderkonto so lange parken wollen, bis die Vertreter der deutschen Kakistokratie mit totalitären, faschistischen, kommunistischen, bolschewistischen und sozialistischen Strömungen, zu lebenslangem Sozialdienst in Senioren-Residenzen (oder lieber nicht) verdonnert wurden oder sich ihre Spuren in selbstloser Aufopferung für Unseredemokratie in der Ukraine verloren haben.

Sobald eine Regierung, die zuerst zu beweisen hätte, dass sie bei Verstand ist und ihr Ohr wieder am Willen des Volkes hat, würden diese eingefrorenen Gelder des Souveräns von demselben für mit ihm abgestimmte Projekte zugunsten des Gemeinwohls freigegeben werden. Ein Mitspracherecht der Bevölkerung ist dringend notwendig und laut Grundgesetz auch möglich! Denunzierungsportale und staatlich geförderte NGOs gehörten sicher nicht dazu.

Auch, wenn mit allen Mitteln versucht wird, der demokratischen Grundordnung durch verhaltensauffällig-denkeingeschränkte Ideologinnen und Ideologen den größtmöglichen Schaden, den selbige als solchen nicht erkennen wollen, zuzufügen, gibt es dennoch Möglichkeiten des Widerstands.

Derzeit könnte hilfreich sein:

So viele wie möglich distanzieren sich so weit wie möglich von allen staatlichen Institutionen und bedienen das vom Alt-Parteien-Kartell missbrauchte System nur noch im geringst möglichen Maß.

Es sollte jede Möglichkeit genutzt werden, mit legalen Mitteln Sand ins Getriebe zu streuen.

Es ist die demokratische Pflicht des Souveräns, NEIN zu sagen, wo immer er denkt, dass Freiheit und Demokratie in Gefahr sind. Wer mit offenen Augen durch das Land geht, findet Gründe genug. Zu bestimmen, was Lüge ist, ist nicht Aufgabe der Politik. Dieses Vorgehen gleicht betreutem Denken innerhalb eines vorbestimmten Korridors für ein entmündigtes Volk. Antrieb ist das unbedingte Festhalten an der Macht, die in weiten Teilen längst keinen Rückhalt mehr in der Bevölkerung und sogar innerhalb der Parteien selbst hat.

Zur Erinnerung: Die Meinungsfreiheit schließt auch Lügen ein. Die hier oft aus der Schublade geholte „Nazi-Keule“ dient vor allem der Rechtfertigung der politischen Vorgaben und missbraucht so die Achtung vor den Gräueltaten in der vorläufig dunkelsten Zeit der deutschen Geschichte. Es gibt Anzeichen dafür, sich in Sachen Machtmissbrauch dieser so weit wie möglich anzunähern.

Es ist die demokratische Pflicht zu sagen „ICH MACHE DA NICHT MIT“, wenn politische Entscheidungen getroffen werden, die sich einer friedlichen Einigung und in Konflikten, diplomatischen Verhandlungen, entgegenstellen.

Es ist ein Friedensgebot aller Mütter und Väter, klar und deutlich anzusagen:

„NEIN, MEINE SÖHNE UND TÖCHTER GEB ICH NICHT HER!“

Die Gehirnwäsche und Propaganda-Beschallung durch die Medienkartelle in Funk, Fernsehen und Presse sind zu meiden, wie eine hochansteckende Hauterkrankung bei gleichzeitiger Vergiftung der inneren Organe.

Zahlungen sollten, wo immer es möglich ist, in bar erfolgen. Dies sollte so als Notwendigkeit verinnerlicht werden, wie das Ein- und Ausatmen.

Ein Aufruf zu öffentlichen Protestbekundungen hat derzeit wenig Sinn, da es die deutsche Mentalität nicht hergibt, das Bedürfnis zu spüren, in Massen auf die Straße zu gehen. In anderen europäischen Staaten sieht das anders aus. Besonders beeindruckend jüngst die Friedensaufrufe in Rom mit Menschenmengen, von denen man in Deutschland nur träumen kann.

Die Realität zeigt, dass für eine Veränderung die breite Masse in Deutschland momentan nicht zu gewinnen ist. Zu tief steckt der Deutsche Michel mit seiner German Angst in den Seelen. Daher ist es zunächst die Aufgabe der kritischen, wachen und Dummschwätz-immunen Menschen, einen „Wandel zur Vernunft und eine Abkehr vom Wahnsinn“ herbeizuführen.

Es ist die Zeit gekommen, dass so viele wie möglich, dem Regime, die wohlverdiente, größtmögliche Verachtung, für die Aushöhlung der Demokratie, die massive Einschränkung der Rede- und Meinungsfreiheit, die zu oft systemkonforme Rechtsprechung, die Ausweitung der Spaltung und das Vergessen-machen-wollen der deutschen Geschichte, entgegenbringen.

Was Deutschland fehlt, ist Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit.

Sollte es, derzeit noch wider Erwarten, dennoch dazu kommen, dass der bereits vorhandene friedliche Widerstand eine wachsende Kraft erzeugen könnte, die Weitere dazu veranlasst, sich ihrer Kraft als der Souverän dieses einst ertragbar-demokratischen Staates wieder bewusst zu werden, wäre ein Generalstreik zu organisieren, um die Macht wieder dahin zu befördern, wo sie hingehört: Nämlich zu den Bürgerinnen und Bürgern eines Landes, das weitgehend vergessen hat, dass seine Ahnen die Demokratie mit ihrem Blut erkämpft haben und dass die Demokratie kein Dauergeschenk ist, für das man sich nie wieder einzusetzen hat. Die derzeitigen Machthaber haben ihren Auftrag zum Wohle des deutschen Volkes tätig zu sein offensichtlich vergessen. Man muss sie dringend wieder daran erinnern, wofür sie gewählt wurden: Die Interessen des Volkes umzusetzen und nicht ihre Vorstellungen davon. In ihrer Überheblichkeit glauben sie zu wissen, was gut für das Volk ist. Leider wissen sie es nicht!

Eine Einordnung als „Hass und Hetze“ durch das deutsch-orwellsche Wahrheitsministerium verbietet sich, da dies die perfiden Maßnahmen im Dritten Reich zu Unrecht relativieren würden.

Die Menschlichkeit gebietet, den verirrten Geistern in Entscheiderpositionen Mitgefühl entgegenzubringen, da sie in gutem Glauben und der Überzeugung sind, nur Gutes zum Wohle des deutschen Volkes, schadenabwendend zu vollbringen. Grund ist die Ideologie, von der sie gar nicht merken (oder es nicht merken wollen), dass sie in ihr gefangen sind.

Nachgeschlagen in einem deutschen Herkunftswörterbuch von 2001 kommt das Wort „Delegitimation“ noch gar nicht vor. Diese Neuschöpfung scheint, durch die politische Kaste entstanden, der Notwendigkeit geschuldet zu sein, kritische Stimmen mundtot machen zu wollen. Sie dient einzig und allein als Totschlagargument. Jeder, der seine demokratische Pflicht wahrnimmt, politische Entscheidungen zu hinterfragen und Kritik auszusprechen, trägt zur lebendigen Debattenkultur bei und hält damit die in einer Demokratie innewohnende Meinungsfreiheit hoch. Kritik, und sei sie noch so scharf, als Delegitimation zu bezeichnen, spricht eher von einer charakterlichen Fehlbildung und Ungeeignetheit für ein politisches Amt in einer Demokratie, als dass sie Respekt vor der Meinungsäußerung des Souveräns zeigt. Gleichzeitig entlarvt die Erfindung des Begriffes Delegitimation, anstelle von Zensur (das wäre zu offensichtlich), durch ihrer Realitätsferne, die fehlende politische Wirkungskraft, so dass man nicht mehr anders weiter weiß, als sich von der Demokratie entfernend, totalitär anmutender Mittel bedienen zu müssen.

Mit den Mitteln der Freiheit sind die Menschen in der Lage, diese armen Politiker-Seelen von ihrem Leiden zu befreien. Ein Besinnen auf die christliche Kultur des Abendlandes kann hier sehr hilfreich sein. Ein Erinnern an die europäische Kultur und Geschichte ebenso.

Dass viele Menschen die legitimen Mittel der Freiheit derzeit nicht nutzen, liegt vielleicht daran, dass das, was ihnen bisher als Freiheit verkauft wurde, aus menschlicher Sicht gar keine Freiheit ist. Die Auswahl in einem 5 Meter langen Yoghurt-Regal ist keine Freiheit! Vielleicht haben viele Menschen sogar Angst vor wirklicher, innerer Freiheit, weil da eine große innere Leere ist, die mit eigener Persönlichkeit durch individuelle, charakterliche Eigenschaften auszufüllen wäre. Man kann diesen Menschen noch nicht einmal einen Vorwurf daraus machen, weil das Bildungssystem gar kein Interesse daran hat, zu viele Menschen heranzubilden, die die Demokratie-Simulation durchschauen.

Es scheint, als würde man mit allen Mitteln versuchen, den jahrhundertealten geschichtlichen Faden Deutschlands und Europas durchschneiden zu wollen und den dunklen Teil der deutschen Geschichte ausklammernd dazu zu missbrauchen, den fortgeschrittenen Wahnsinn zu legitimieren.

Dieser Beitrag wurde mit dem Pareto-Client geschrieben.

@ d0aa74cd:603d35cd

Experimenting with cat package examples.

Gleam #Gleamlang #cat #Haskell

https://photonsphere.org/post/2025-04-11-gleam-cat/

@ fbf0e434:e1be6a39

Hackathon 概要

Hack The Grid — Level 2 是 LUKSO 推出的四级创作者项目的第二阶段，重点在于开发mini去中心化应用程序（dApps）。本阶段共有 70 名注册开发者参与，最终审批了 41 个 BUIDL 项目。该阶段鼓励参与者在 AI 代理、社交 DeFi、创作者货币化及游戏化等领域创新，致力于将 Universal Profiles 打造成集数字身份、社交互动与创造力于一体的多功能空间。

活动于 2025 年 2 月至 4 月开展，总资金池达 150,000 LYX，分配至各个级别。参与者可在多个阶段远程参与，1 至 3 级的成功项目将在第 4 级的社区资助轮中获得额外支持。

黑客松日程包含办公时间与学习会议，通过前期获奖者的见解为参赛者提供帮助。除技术实验外，活动还营造了协作开发环境，展现了去中心化应用程序创建的潜力，培育了生态系统中的创新。Hack The Grid 凸显了开发者社区的积极参与以及值得关注的项目贡献。

Hackathon 获奖者

ORIGIN GRANTS 奖项获奖作品

在第2级类别中，两个项目因其技术创新和对生态系统目标的对齐获得了Origin Grants的认可。

• Hiraeth Mini App： 此应用程序将区块链交易转变为基于NFT的数字文物，通过独特的表现形式捕捉各链上的历史叙事。
• Multisend - Defolio： MultiSend 提供了一种简化的方法，用于在单个交易中在 LUKSO 区块链上执行多个代币和NFT的转移，提高了资产管理的效率。

这些获奖项目以其对智能合约安全性、用户友好的界面、技术执行以及对 LUKSO 社区的价值增值而闻名。每位Origin Grant获奖者将获得价值$2,250的LYX，其中70%会提前发放，剩余金额取决于实现以采用为重点的KPI。获奖者还有机会进军第4级——社区资助轮，通过二次方融资获得额外的$24,000 LYX。

完整项目列表，请访问 DoraHacks。

关于组织者

LUKSO

LUKSO 是一家专注于区块链解决方案的技术导向型组织，专注于数字生活方式和创意经济。它因其在区块链基础设施领域的贡献而获得认可，并在开发增强用户中心身份和数字所有权的应用程序中扮演重要角色。该组织在创建Universal Profiles方面起了重要作用，促进了数字平台之间的无缝交互。目前，LUKSO 旨在扩大区块链在日常数字体验中的角色，优先考虑安全性和可访问性，以此为技术领域内多样化的用户群体服务。

@ 2ed3596e:98b4cc78

Americans can now instantly sell bitcoin directly from their Lightning Wallets. The same auto conversion Bitcoin Well Customers are used for instantly and conveniently selling bitcoin from self-custody now has a Lightning option ready in the Sell bitcoin page of your Bitcoin Well account.

Adding the ability to sell bitcoin from the Lightning Network underscores our commitment to enabling you to get the most out of the freedom and independence Bitcoin has to offer. No longer must you rely on giving up custody of your bitcoin or navigate complicated trading interfaces for fast and convenient sales! Just send sats and receive dollars – Lightning fast.

Selling sats from the Lightning Network is quick and easy:

1. From your Bitcoin Well account, go to Sell bitcoin and enter the amount of dollars you want
2. Choose your bank, select “Lightning” and then generate a Lightning Invoice
3. Pay the Lightning invoice and we’ll send dollars to your bank account

Here are detailed steps to guide you on how to sell sats from the Lightning Network 👇

Get your Lightning Invoice

Navigate to your Sell bitcoin page, enter the amount of dollars you wish to receive, set your destination bank account and select “Lightning”.

Tap ‘Generate invoice’ to create a Lightning invoice. This Lightning invoice will be for the exact amount of sats you need to send for the amount of dollars you want to receive.

Send sats to your Lightning Invoice

To instantly sell bitcoin for dollars, simply pay the Lightning Invoice from your Lightning wallet. You can do this by scanning the QR code or by tapping the QR code to copy + paste the invoice into your Lightning wallet. Once received (basically instantly), we automatically convert received sats into dollars and send the dollars to your selected bank account. No waiting for confirmations, no mining fees and no complicated trading interfaces. Just sats in, dollars out. Lightning fast ⚡️

## What is the Lightning Network?

The Lightning Network is a second-layer protocol built on top of Bitcoin. It enables fast, cheap, and private bitcoin payments, perfect for small transactions and daily use. Think of it like the relationship between the credit card network and the banking system. While Bitcoin’s base layer is optimized for security, Lightning is optimized for frequent or small, cheap and private payments for everyday transactions — instantly and without bloating the blockchain. The Lightning Network makes it much more convenient to use bitcoin in everyday life, bringing you closer to replacing your bank with bitcoin.

Currently, sats on the Lightning Network cannot be directly sent to an on-chain bitcoin wallet, and vice versa. However, that won’t remain true for Bitcoin Well accounts for long…

Why Does the Lightning Network Matter?

The Lightning Network helps bitcoin reach its full potential as everyday money. While Bitcoin’s base chain is perfect for storing value, it’s not always practical for everyday payments or quick, small transactions. Lightning fills that gap — it’s fast, inexpensive, and built for a world where people use bitcoin as easily as cash. Bitcoin is the future of money. Lightning makes it usable today. We love Lightning, and have some exciting additional products coming that will shock you!

Earn sats over the Lightning Network

Earn sats when you refer your friends! When you add your Lightning Payment address from your personal Lightning Wallet to your Referral page, every time someone you referred transacts on the portal, you get a kickback paid in sats! Of course, we never custody your bitcoin, even when you get a Lightning referral reward! All bitcoin is always sent straight to your wallet. ⚡\ \ Haven’t signed up with Bitcoin Well yet? Sign up here and embrace the Bitcoin Standard.

About Bitcoin Well

Bitcoin Well exists to enable independence. We do this by coupling the convenience of modern banking, with the benefits of bitcoin. In other words, we want to make it easy to use bitcoin in self-custody.  ⁠ ⁠

We are publicly traded (and love it when our customers become shareholders!) and hold ourselves to a high standard of enabling life on a Bitcoin standard. If you want to learn more about Bitcoin Well, please visit our website or reach out!

@ fbf0e434:e1be6a39

Hackathon 概述

Innovate on Creator Network #Creathon 圆满落幕，116 位注册开发者中有 44 个项目获批。此次黑客松的主要目标是借助去中心化应用程序（dApps），在去中心化金融（DeFi）、非同质化代币（NFTs）、游戏及社会影响等领域，强化 Creator Network 生态系统。活动于 2025 年 1 月 19 日至 2 月 24 日期间举办，设置了 1,250 USDT 的奖金池，将颁发给十名获奖者，其中前三名的奖金在 200 美元至 300 美元之间。

在此次黑客松中展示的项目，通过创新性和功能性，展现了对 Creator Network 生态系统的潜在影响。这些项目如今有机会进一步融入平台并获得支持。活动极大地吸引了开发者参与，参与者们利用了 Creator Network 的开发工具和测试网。这一举措标志着，在通过创新技术方案拓展 Creator Network 能力及强化其生态系统方面，迈出了重要一步。

Hackathon 获奖者

Creator Network 奖项获奖者

• DeFi Connect Credit： 在Creator Testnet Network上运作的去中心化交易所，通过提供代币交换、锁定、深度流动性和投票机制来增强去中心化和流动性管理，提高DeFi解决方案。
• Lumoswap： 基于Creatorchain的去中心化交易所，提供快速、安全且用户友好的交易体验。它解决了DeFi生态系统中交易速度和安全性等关键问题。
• Sendtokens： 一个具备自我保管功能的加密货币钱包，通过简化交易和提高用户体验，解决了与冗长钱包地址和界面可用性相关的常见挑战。
• Tokens： 该平台简化了加密货币代币的创建，提供在去中心化环境中高效管理和部署的工具，确保即时可见性和实用性。
• ProtectedPay： 一个多链DeFi平台，促进安全交易和群组支付。它整合了储蓄功能，以在区块链网络中增强安全性和便利性。
• AuditFi_Creator： 利用AI技术为智能合约提供即时链上审计报告，从而加强Creator Network生态系统中的信任和安全性。

关于所有项目的详细信息，请访问 Hackathon 详情页 。

组织者信息

Creator Network

Creator Network 是一家以技术为核心的组织，专注于区块链解决方案。它因开发增强区块链互操作性和安全性的去中心化平台而闻名。该组织已经推出了多个项目，旨在改善数字资产管理和智能合约功能。Creator Network 致力于扩展区块链的可访问性，促进数字生态系统的透明度。

@ 502ab02a:a2860397

วันนี้เรามาคุยกันเรื่องที่ว่า บรอกโคลี เข้าร่วมเส้นทางของความ fiat food ยังไงกันครับ

ในอดีตกาล เมล็ดพันธุ์เป็นของสาธารณะ เป็นมรดกของมนุษยชาติที่ส่งต่อจากรุ่นสู่รุ่น ต้นข้าว ต้นถั่ว ต้นผัก ล้วนเติบโตจากธรรมชาติ ผ่านมือของชาวนาอย่างเสรี ไม่มีใครเป็นเจ้าของมันได้ คนอินเดีย คนไทย คนแอฟริกัน ต่างมีเมล็ดพันธุ์ของตนเอง เหมือนมีภาษาท้องถิ่นที่เล่าขานกันรุ่นต่อรุ่น

แต่แล้ววันหนึ่ง โลกเข้าสู่ยุค “Fiat” เมื่ออุตสาหกรรมเกษตรข้ามชาติอย่าง Monsanto, Bayer, Syngenta และ DuPont รวมพลังกันเปลี่ยนสิ่งมีชีวิตให้กลายเป็น “ทรัพย์สิน” เมล็ดพันธุ์ถูกจดสิทธิบัตร เกษตรกรเก็บเมล็ดพันธุ์ไว้ปลูกใหม่ กลับกลายเป็น “อาชญากร”! โลกเปลี่ยนจากการปลูกเพื่อกิน สู่การปลูกเพื่อขึ้นศาล กฎหมายและสิทธิบัตรกลายเป็นเครื่องมือในการควบคุม บริษัทเหล่านี้ใช้กฎหมายทรัพย์สินทางปัญญา เช่น สิทธิบัตรและสิทธิของผู้ปรับปรุงพันธุ์พืช (Plant Breeders' Rights) เพื่อควบคุมเมล็ดพันธุ์ กฎหมายเหล่านี้จำกัดสิทธิของเกษตรกรในการเก็บ ใช้ แลกเปลี่ยน หรือขายเมล็ดพันธุ์ของตนเอง

ปลูกอะไร? ปลูกหนี้? ชาวนาในอินเดียบางรัฐถึงกับฆ่าตัวตาย เพราะซื้อเมล็ดพันธุ์จีเอ็มโอที่มีสิทธิบัตรราคาแพงจากบริษัทเหล่านี้ พวกเขาไม่สามารถเก็บเมล็ดไว้ใช้ปีต่อไป ต้องซื้อใหม่ทุกปี บางครั้งซื้อแล้วปลูกไม่ได้ผล เพราะพันธุ์ไม่เหมาะกับภูมิอากาศของเขา แต่ก็ยังต้องจ่ายหนี้ จ่ายค่าปุ๋ย จ่ายค่าฆ่าแมลงที่บริษัทบอกว่าจำเป็นต่อเมล็ดของมัน ในขณะที่ผู้ที่ไม่ได้เดือดร้อนจากเรื่องนี้ มักบอกว่า ช่วยไม่ได้ไปเลือกซื้อของเขาเอง?

พูดให้เห็นภาพก็คือบริษัทเหล่านี้สร้างระบบแบบ “log in” เหมือนซอฟต์แวร์ ผูกเมล็ดพันธุ์เข้ากับเคมีภัณฑ์ ผูกเคมีเข้ากับกฎหมาย ผูกกฎหมายเข้ากับรัฐบาล และผูกรัฐบาลเข้ากับองค์กรโลกที่เห็น “ความมั่นคงทางอาหาร” เป็นเพียงบรรทัดนึงของ account เราครับ

-ค่าใช้จ่ายที่เพิ่มขึ้น เกษตรกรต้องซื้อเมล็ดพันธุ์ใหม่ทุกฤดูกาลเพราะถูกห้ามไม่ให้เก็บเมล็ดพันธุ์จากผลผลิตเดิม ทำให้ต้นทุนการผลิตสูงขึ้น​ -การสูญเสียความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพ การเน้นปลูกพืชสายพันธุ์เดียวกันทั่วโลกทำให้พืชท้องถิ่นและสายพันธุ์พื้นเมืองลดลง ซึ่งส่งผลต่อความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพและความยืดหยุ่นของระบบนิเวศ​ -ความเสี่ยงต่อความมั่นคงทางอาหาร การพึ่งพาเมล็ดพันธุ์จากบริษัทไม่กี่แห่งทำให้ระบบอาหารโลกเสี่ยงต่อการผันผวนของตลาดและการเปลี่ยนแปลงทางการเมือง

บรอกโคลี กับการเป็น Fiat Food ในรูปแบบพืช เริ่มมาจากพืชตระกูลผักกาด เช่น บรอกโคลี กระหล่ำดอก คะน้า และกะหล่ำปลี ถูก “ปรับปรุงพันธุ์” โดยมนุษย์จากบรรพบุรุษเดียวกัน มัสตาร์ดป่า พวกมันไม่สามารถขยายพันธุ์ตามธรรมชาติได้ ต้องอาศัยโรงงานผลิตเมล็ดพันธุ์โดยเฉพาะ และในบางกรณี ไม่มีเมล็ดเลย ต้องขยายพันธุ์โดย “Hybrid Sterility System” บริษัทผู้ผลิตเมล็ดพันธุ์จึงควบคุมได้หมด ใครจะปลูกต้องขออนุญาต ใครจะขายต้องผ่านระบบควบคุม

นั่นแหละ... เข้าคออนเสป Fiat Food ตัวจริง อาหารที่ดูเขียว ดูคลีน ดูดีต่อใจ แต่ไร้ “รากเหง้า” และถูกสร้างขึ้นด้วยอำนาจเหนือธรรมชาติอย่างจงใจ ไม่ใช่ของจากธรรมชาติ ไม่ใช่ของจากพระเจ้าแต่เป็นของจาก “วาระซ่อนเร้น” ที่ซ่อนอยู่ในแสงแฟลชของโฆษณาอาหารคลีน การประเคนข้อดีของความเป็น super food โดยไม่พูดถึงเหรียญอีกด้าน เหรียญด้านมืดของมัน

ดังนั้นก็เลยเกิดสมการ อธิปไตยของเมล็ดพันธุ์ = อิสรภาพของมนุษยชาติ การต่อสู้ครั้งนี้ไม่ใช่แค่เรื่องของเกษตรกรรม แต่มันคือ “การเมืองของชีวิต” เพราะใครก็ตามที่ควบคุมเมล็ดพันธุ์ เขาคือผู้ควบคุมอาหาร และใครควบคุมอาหาร เขาคือผู้ควบคุมโลก การต่อสู้ก็เลยมีองค์กรอย่าง Navdanya ในอินเดีย หรือ La Via Campesina ในลาตินอเมริกา ที่ลุกขึ้นมาปกป้อง “สิทธิในการปลูกของมนุษย์” มีคนขนานนามว่าพวกเขาไม่ใช่นักเกษตร พวกเขาคือนักปฏิวัติ

ดร. วันทนา ศิวะ Vandana Shiva นักฟิสิกส์ชาวอินเดียผู้กลายมาเป็นนักเคลื่อนไหวด้านสิ่งแวดล้อมและอาหาร ผู้ก่อตั้งโรงเรียนเมล็ดพันธุ์พืชนวธัญญะ (Navdanya) ผู้ปกป้องพืชท้องถิ่นจากบริษัทข้ามชาติที่คิดจะเข้ามายึดประชาธิปไตยทางอาหารไปจากมือประชาชน คือตัวอย่างที่ชัดเจนคนหนึ่ง เจ้าของวลี “หากจะยึดครองประเทศจงยึดแหล่งน้ำมัน แต่หากต้องการยึดครองชีวิต จงยึดเมล็ดพันธุ์พืชของพวกเขา”

งานเขียนที่น่าสนใจของเธอคือ Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability and Peace ปี 2005 เป็นการออกมาตอบโต้ระบบทุนนิยม ที่มองว่าทุกสิ่งทุกอย่างบนโลกใบนี้มีไว้ขาย เพื่อเก็งกำไร พร้อมทั้งตั้งคำถามว่า หากผืนดินไม่ใช่ของมนุษย์ โลกไม่ได้เป็นสินทรัพย์ น้ำทุกหยด เมล็ดพันธุ์พืชทุกชนิดล้วนเป็นของธรรมชาติ ความคิดของบริษัทที่จะเข้ามาผูกขาดธรรมชาติเป็นสิ่งที่สมควรจริงหรือ

ดังนั้นสรุปๆกันจากที่ผมจั่วไว้ว่า บรอกโคลี อีกตัวแทนแห่ง fiat food นั้นคือประตูบานแรกที่ชักนำให้เราฉุกคิดถึงรูปแบบของ อาหารที่ปลอมตัวมาอยู่ในรูปแบบ real food โดยภาพร่างประมาณนี้ครับ เมล็ดพันธุ์พื้นเมือง เคยเป็นของสาธารณะ → ถูกบริษัท “แปรรูป” เป็นทรัพย์สิน การเก็บเมล็ดพันธุ์ใช้ซ้ำ กลายเป็นสิ่งผิดกฎหมายในหลายประเทศ เกษตรกรกลายเป็นทาส ของระบบ “Fiat Seed” เหมือนเราทุกคนเป็นทาสของ “Fiat Money” บรอกโคลีและผักไฮบริดอื่นๆ คือตัวแทนของการควบคุมระบบอาหารผ่านสายพันธุ์ที่คนทั่วไปปลูกเองไม่ได้ ทางออกที่กลุ่มคนมีความหวังกับมันคือ Seed Sovereignty คืนสิทธิให้ชุมชน เก็บ แบ่ง แลก เปลี่ยนเมล็ดพันธุ์เองได้

การผูกขาดเมล็ดพันธุ์โดยบริษัทยักษ์ใหญ่ส่งผลกระทบต่อเกษตรกรและความมั่นคงทางอาหารอย่างมาก การเคลื่อนไหวเพื่ออธิปไตยทางเมล็ดพันธุ์เป็นสิ่งจำเป็นในการปกป้องสิทธิของเกษตรกรและรักษาความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพของพืชผลในอนาคต ใครกุมเมล็ดพันธุ์ คนนั้นกุมคอหอยมนุษย์ทั้งโลก

อ่านถึงตรงนี้แล้ว นึกถึงพืชอื่นอะไรอีกบ้าง? ทิ้งไว้ให้ตั้งคำถามกันต่อครับ ตอนต่อไปจะว่าด้วยเรื่องของ สนธิสัญญาและกฎหมายต่างๆครับ

แถมให้ดูคลิปการปลูก บรอกโคลี ครับ https://youtu.be/8ZNPTMIEFV8?si=SKZy
ผมเลือกคลิปที่ถ่ายโดย local ไม่ได้เป็น pr film โปรโมทองค์กรใดๆ เพื่อให้เห็นกระบวนการแท้ๆเลยนะครับ

ส่วนคำถามที่ว่า แล้วจะกินอะไรได้ ตอบได้เลยว่า กินได้ทุกอย่างแหละครับ แต่ช่วยรู้ด้วยว่า อย่าไปคิดว่าอะไรเทพ อะไร superfood เลย โลกไม่ได้สวยงามขนาดนั้นครับ เราถึงพยายามชักชวนมาทำให้ local แข็งแรงไง

#PirateKeto #กูต้องรู้มั๊ย #ม้วนหางสิลูก

@ c230edd3:8ad4a712

Chef's notes

Wildly enough, this is delicious. It's sweet and savory.

(I copied this recipe off of a commercial cheese maker's site, just FYI)

I hadn't fully froze the ice cream when I took the picture shown. This is fresh out of the churner.

Details

• ⏲️ Prep time: 15 min
• 🍳 Cook time: 30 min
• 🍽️ Servings: 4

Ingredients

• 12 oz blue cheese
• 3 Tbsp lemon juice
• 1 c sugar
• 1 tsp salt
• 1 qt heavy cream
• 3/4 c chopped dark chocolate

Directions

1. Put the blue cheese, lemon juice, sugar, and salt into a bowl
2. Bring heavy cream to a boil, stirring occasionally
3. Pour heavy cream over the blue cheese mix and stir until melted
4. Pour into prepared ice cream maker, follow unit instructions
5. Add dark chocolate halfway through the churning cycle
6. Freeze until firm. Enjoy.

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

Basketball

March Madness wrapped up with some very exciting games. We'll recap the championship, the contest, and the fun we had at Predyx.

I've also decided how I want to do a similar contest for the NBA Playoffs. Better than that, though, is the Bracket Challenge we'll be doing with Global Sports Central. We also need to update our NBA Predictions and talk about the wild finish in the Western Conference, where multiple playoff teams fired their head coaches.

Football

The NFL Draft is coming up and @grayruby found a very cool new simulator. What are we predicting for the first round?

Also, we're continuing to very much enjoy the Aussie Rules contest and highlights.

The Other Football

UEFA Champions League is back and we're all trying to survive a little longer.

Baseball

Why was half my fantasy roster inactive? Plus, @grayruby wants to overreact to the early season results.

Also, the MLB Survivor Pool is starting up soon.

Hockey

@siggy47's beloved team enters the history books, by allowing Ovi to become the NHL's all-time leading scorer.

Cricket

I fell flat on my face in the T20k contest immediately after mocking @grayruby for doing the same. Oh well, upwards and onwards.

@Coinsreporter is also still running the perpetual CricZap contest, which I continue to do very poorly at. Is it time to inverse Cramer myself?

The Predyx market for the IPL has been one of my favorites.

F1

There are a couple of new F1 markets: Constructor and Driver, for those who may be interested.

Misc

We also need an update on USA vs the world.

Time permitting, I have some thoughts about how new sporting events like Chase might evolve in the sports ecosystem.

Let us know what else you want to hear and we'll endeavor to cover it.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/940727

@ e516ecb8:1be0b167

¿Qué es realmente la inflación? Si alguna vez has escuchado que la inflación es “la subida constante de precios”, no estás solo. Hace poco, un economista soltó esa definición en una entrevista, y otro, desde la Fundación para el Progreso (FPP), una institución que suele citar a pensadores como Mises o Hayek, repitió lo mismo. Suena lógico, ¿no? Pero están equivocados. Y ese error, aunque parezca pequeño, puede tener consecuencias catastróficas. Para entender por qué, no hace falta ir muy lejos: miremos a Argentina.

La subida de precios no es la inflación. Es solo el síntoma. La inflación, en esencia, es la pérdida del valor adquisitivo de la moneda. Confundir la causa con el efecto es como tratar una fiebre con un paño frío sin atacar la infección. Y cuando las políticas públicas se basan en esa confusión, el desastre está garantizado.

Argentina: una lección que duele Argentina es el caso de estudio perfecto. Antes de que Javier Milei llegara al poder en diciembre de 2023, la inflación en el país vecino estaba desbocada, alcanzando picos de 211% anual según datos del INDEC. El peronismo, convencido de que el problema eran los precios, implementó medidas como los “Precios Justos”, fijando topes artificiales. ¿Resultado? Escasez total. En un país famoso por su carne, los supermercados se quedaron sin ella. Los productores, enfrentados a costos que subían sin control, preferían exportar antes que vender localmente a precios que no les daban ni para cubrir gastos. Y ahí no terminó la cosa. En lugar de atacar la raíz del problema, el gobierno peronista complicó todo aún más: restringió exportaciones y creó un sistema surrealista de múltiples tipos de dólar (¡hasta uno distinto para Netflix!). Todo porque seguían peleando con el efecto, no con la causa.

¿Por qué los argentinos corrían a ahorrar en dólares y no en pesos? Porque el peso se devaluaba a una velocidad alarmante. Si la inflación fuera solo una cuestión de precios, habría afectado a todas las monedas por igual. Pero no. Como dice Milei una y otra vez, la inflación es un fenómeno monetario: demasiados billetes circulando sin respaldo o una moneda que la gente considera “de segunda” frente a otras.

¿Por qué seguimos repitiendo el error? Entonces, si la inflación es tan claramente un problema del valor de la moneda, ¿por qué seguimos escuchando que es una subida de precios? La respuesta es sencilla: culpar a otros es más fácil. Cuando se vende esa idea, los políticos pueden apuntar con el dedo a empresarios, comerciantes o “especuladores” y lavarse las manos. Es más cómodo que admitir una emisión monetaria irresponsable, un gasto público descontrolado o una pésima gestión económica. Y no faltan economistas, a veces financiados por grupos estatistas o formados en sistemas educativos que promueven esas ideas, que les hacen el coro.

Chile: por un pelo nos salvamos Este malentendido estuvo a punto de colarse en Chile. En el segundo intento de reforma constitucional, impulsado por Chile Vamos en 2023, se propuso que el Banco Central velara por la “estabilidad de precios”, no por la estabilidad del valor de la moneda. Parece un detalle técnico, ¿verdad? Pero no lo es. Ese cambio abría la puerta a políticas que podrían habernos llevado por el mismo camino que Argentina. Por suerte, aunque muchos expertos lo pasaron por alto, la ciudadanía no: la propuesta fue rechazada en las urnas con un contundente “En Contra”.

Nos salvamos, pero no porque nuestros políticos tuvieran las ideas claras. Nos salvamos porque los chilenos dijimos “basta”. Y menos mal, porque en 2024 la inflación en Chile se mantuvo controlada, rondando el 3,5% anual según el Banco Central, lejos del caos argentino. Pero no podemos confiarnos, porque esa inflación sigue siendo alta para nuestros estándares pre-pandémicos o pre-estallido social. El retiro desde las AFP convirtió activos en consumo, en otras palabras aumentó el circulante y todavía batallamos con esa inflación.

No es un “detallito” Cada vez que alguien diga que la inflación es una subida de precios o que la solución está en controlarlos, por favor, corrígelo. No es un error menor. Argentina lleva más de un año intentando salir del pozo que cavó este malentendido. Milei ha dado pasos importantes: transparentó la inflación real, ajustó el tipo de cambio para acercarse al valor de mercado y, aunque la inflación sigue alta (cerca del 50% anual a fines de 2024, según estimaciones), empieza a estabilizarse. Pero el camino es largo, y los costos de este “detallito” los pagan todos los argentinos.

¿Y ahora qué hacemos? La próxima vez que escuches a un político o un experto hablar de inflación como si fuera solo un problema de precios, no te quedes callado. Pregúntales: ¿y el valor de la moneda qué? Comparte esta historia, porque entender la inflación es el primer paso para no repetir los errores del pasado. En Chile esquivamos la bala, pero no podemos bajar la guardia. Los errores pequeños, cuando se trata de economía, terminan costándonos caro.

¿Qué opinas? ¿Crees que Chile aprendió la lección o estamos a un paso de tropezar otra vez? ¡Déja tu comentario y comparte este post si te hizo clic!

@ 0b118e40:4edc09cb

There’s an African proverb that says, “To get lost is to learn the way.”

Humans have always been explorers, searching for connection. To belong. To feel home. You can trace this instinct back to the start of our existence. Whether you start with Adam and Eve or the “Out of Africa” theory, the story is the same. We’ve always moved toward each other, building tribes and forming communities.

But somewhere along the way, something broke. With the rise of empires and organized control, religion and politics divided us into bubbles. We were sorted, labeled, and often pitted against one another. While technology advanced, something fundamental was lost. Our ability to truly connect started to fade.

Then came the internet, a modern-day Silk Road. It rekindled hope. Walls seemed to crumble, distances disappeared, and we dreamed of a truly connected world. For a time, it felt like the answer.

And then it wasn’t.

The history of Internet

The story began around 1830s when Charles Babbage started working on his computer prototype but without moolah he couldn't continue. A century later, after WW2 in the 1950s, the US Department of Defense funded what became known as modern computing.

Back then the military relied on systems like the Navajo Code Talkers. The indigenous code talkers were ingenious but operated under dangerous conditions, always on the frontlines.

In 1969, ARPANET made a revolutionary breakthrough as it connected four university computers for the first time. It was a big deal.

At that time, the internet was about openness. Researchers pushed for universal protocols. This gave rise to hacker culture that valued knowledge-sharing and keeping systems accessible to everyone.

In the 80s, NSFNET (National Science Foundation ) expanded these connections but kept it strictly for academic use only. That caused massive dissatisfaction.

Senator Al Gore pitched the concept of the “information superhighway,” to balance public access with private innovation. But by the 90s, the Clinton administration leaned into privatization. NSFNET’s infrastructure was completely handed off to private companies, and the internet grew into a commercial powerhouse.

The good news is that everyone has internet access now. Bad news is that what started as something free from government and commercial control became completely dominated by both.

Open source vs IP during the early internet days

This part of the story is about Bill Gates and Marc Andreessen.

Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web, but Marc saw the opportunity to make it user-friendly. He launched Netscape, an open-source browser. It drove the openness of internet culture. Netscape captured 90% of the market by giving its software away for free, and monetizing through other means.

Then came along Bill Gates. Microsoft back then was known for its aggressive tactics to monopolize industries. Gates licensed Mosaic’s code, created Internet Explorer, and bundled it for free with Windows 95. He wasn’t shy about playing dirty, even formed exclusive contracts with manufacturers to block competitors. Even the Department of Justice tried to file an antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft, but by then, it was too late. Netscape’s market share crumbled, and its position in the industry eroded.

Windows 95 brought the internet to the people globally, but it also closed it up.

Marc Andreeson started with open source ideologies, but is now funding altcoin projects.

The Californian ideology

Around this time, the term “Californian Ideology” started floating around. It was an unusual mix of libertarianism, techno-utopianism, and countercultural ideals. A marriage of cultural bohemianism (hippies) with high-tech entrepreneurship (yuppies). This ideology fused left-wing values like freedom of expression and direct democracy with right-wing beliefs in free markets and minimal government interference.

I absolutely love it.

Ironically, the term “Californian Ideology” wasn’t coined as a compliment. Richard Barbrook and Andy Cameron used it to piss on these visionaries for romanticizing the idea that the internet must remain a lawless, egalitarian space.

But many people loved and embraced the Californian ideology. Stewart Brand, who founded The Whole Earth Catalog, connected counterculture with early tech innovation. His work inspired people like Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. Steve Wozniak used to share Apple’s early schematics at the Homebrew Computer Club for feedback and collaboration.

EBay’s founder Pierre Omidyar envisioned eBay as a libertarian experiment. He believed the “invisible hand” of the market would ensure fairness. But as eBay grew, fraud, disputes, and dissatisfaction among users forced Omidyar to introduce governance which contradicted his goals.

And this story repeats itself over the years.

Platforms begin with libertarian visions, but as they scale, real-world challenges emerge. Governance (government, corporate charters, advertisers, and investors) is introduced to address safety and trust issues.

But they also chip away at the liberty the internet once promised.

Can Nostr be the solution ?

Yes.

But to appreciate Nostr, let’s first understand how the internet works today. (Note : I am no expert of this section but I'll try my best to explain)

The internet operates through four main layers:

1. Application Layer (where apps like browsers, Google, or Zoom live)
2. Transport Layer
3. Internet Layer
4. Network Access Layer

Let’s use a simple example of searching “Pink Panther” on Google.

Step 1: The Application Layer - You open your browser, type "Pink Panther," and hit search. This request is sent using HTTP/HTTPS (a protocol that formats the query and ensures it's secure).

Step 2: The Transport Layer - Think of your search query as a letter being sent. The Transport Layer breaks it into smaller packets (like splitting a long letter into multiple envelopes). TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) ensures all packets arrive and reassemble in the correct order.

Step 3: The Internet Layer - This layer acts like a postal service, assigning each device an address (IP address) to route the packets properly. Your device's IP (e.g., 192.168.1.10) and Google’s server IP (e.g., 142.250.72.238) help routers find the best path to deliver your packets.

Step 4: The Network Access Layer - Finally, the Network Access Layer physically delivers the packets. These travel as electrical signals (over cables), radio waves (Wi-Fi), or light pulses (fiber optics). This is the act of moving envelopes via trucks, planes, or postal workers, just much faster.

So how is data transmitted via Nostr ?

Nostr’s architecture of the Internet

Nostr reimagines the Application Layer while keeping the lower layers (Transport, Internet, and Network Access) largely unchanged.

In the traditional internet stack, the Application Layer is where platforms like Google or Twitter operate. It’s also where most censorship occurs due to single point of failure (centralised servers). Nostr flips this model on its head.

Technically, it’s like building a parallel internet that shares the same foundational layers but diverges at the top.

To borrow from Robert Frost:

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference."

For Nostr to fully realize its potential, it needs its own ecosystem of apps. Developers can build these tools within the Nostr protocol's framework

Let’s say there is a search engine on Nostr called Noogle.

Here’s how it works:

When you type "Pink Panther" on Noogle, your query is sent to multiple relays (servers) simultaneously. Each relay processes or forwards the query and returns results based on the data it holds.

As Nostr grows, the amount of information on relays will increase, giving Noogle more robust search results. But the biggest win is that compared to Google, Nostr's Noogle will have no ads, no surveillance, just pure, decentralized searching that respects your privacy.

For the transport layer, Nostr still relies on TCP/IP but enhances it with privacy and efficiency. Encrypted messages and simplified protocols enable faster real-time communication. The rest of the layer remains unchanged.

At its core, Nostr takes the internet back to its original ideals: open, uncensored, and decentralized.

Why Nostr matters ?

The internet we use today relies on centralized systems at the application layer. This creates a single point of failure where governments and corporations can control access, censor content, monitor activity, and even shut down entire platforms.

For example, the Malaysian government once proposed routing all web traffic through a centralized system, claiming it was for "security" reasons. In reality, this action allow those in power to block access to specific content or platforms that might threaten their positions.

Centralization weaponizes the internet.

It turns what was meant to be a tool for connection and freedom into a mechanism for control and oppression.

Let's look at DNS and ISPs as examples. DNS (Domain Name System) is like the phonebook of the internet. It helps translate website names (like example.com) into IP addresses so your browser can connect to them. ISPs (Internet Service Providers) are companies that give you access to the internet.

Both are controlled by centralized entities. If a government gains control of either, it can block specific websites or even shut down internet access entirely.

We've seen this happen repeatedly: * India’s internet shutdowns in regions like Kashmir * Turkey’s social media bans during political events * Ethiopia’s internet blackouts * China’s Great Firewall blocking major platforms like Google and Facebook * Even the US, where Edward Snowden revealed massive surveillance programs

This is where Nostr comes in, as the antidote to centralized control.

Instead of relying on centralized servers or platforms, Nostr creates a peer-to-peer network of independent relays. No single entity controls it. There is no central switch governments can flip to block access. If one relay is shut down, users simply connect to others in the network.

Nostr’s decentralized design makes it: * Resistant to censorship: Governments cannot easily block or filter content. * Privacy-preserving: Users can communicate anonymously, even in heavily surveilled environments. * Resilient: With no single point of failure, the network keeps running, even under attack.

And it gets better. Nostr can integrate with privacy tools like Tor to bypass restrictions entirely, making it nearly impossible for governments to stop.

The internet has become a battlefield for control, but Nostr provides a way to reclaim digital freedom. It empowers people to build, connect, and share without fear of being silenced.

How does Nostr overcome the "Californian Ideology" problems?

The Californian Ideology seemed like the blueprint for a utopian internet, libertarian ideals wrapped in Silicon Valley innovation. But as centralized platforms scaled, cracks started to show. Challenges like trust, safety, and accessibility forced governance teams to step in and decide “what’s best for the people.”

This resulted in platforms once built on ideals of freedom in becoming gatekeepers of control.

Nostr breaks this cycle. How?

1. Trust issues - With private keys, you control your identity and data. Moderation is decentralized. You can block or mute others at a personal level or through client tools, not by relying on a central authority. While this system needs refinement to be more user-friendly, it fundamentally shifts the power to users.

2. Funding Without Advertiser - Nostr’s integration of Bitcoin and the Lightning Network eliminates reliance on advertisers or corporate sponsors. Bitcoin enables anyone to contribute without gatekeeping. As more people join and apps mature, this model only gets stronger. For now, we have good souls like Jack seeding it.

3. Resisting Government Control - (refer to the above) Nostr avoids single points of attacks.

So what is Nostr ?

Nostr is internet

The new internet.

The open and free internet.

What can you build on Nostr?

Anything you have seen on the internet, you can recreate on Nostr. Anything you can imagine, you can bring to life here. It is a blank canvas for dreamers, builders, and changemakers.

But the best part is this. You have Bitcoin as its financial backbone. This changes the game entirely.

And with new games, comes new rules. New vibes. New ways.

The way people use this new internet will be different from the traditional internet as control falls back to the people. With Bitcoin as the underlying backbone, the business models will be different.

But there is more to it than just creating. There's that joy of creation, where we invite curiosity and inspire users to experience something new, something revolutionary.

Have you watched “The Last Lecture” by Randy Pausch?

He coined the term “head fake.” He taught his students programming, but not everyone was excited to learn programming. So he created fun projects and performances that pulled them in. The students had so much fun, they didn’t even realize they were learning to code.

What you build on Nostr is that head fake. The apps and projects you create draw people in with fun and utility, subtly reminding them they have a right to their own voice and thoughts.

The work you’re doing is so precious. When everything feels like doom and gloom, it’s these kinds of projects that give people hope.

Through Nostr, you’re making a difference. One project, one connection at a time.

The new Internet era

Centralized systems, like empires of the past, eventually crumble under the weight of their control. Decentralization provides a different path. It is a modern revival of our primal instincts to explore, connect, and build tribes.

By definition, Nostr is a protocol. I think more so, it's a philosophy. It challenges us to rethink how we share, communicate, and create. It is the internet as it was meant to be. Free, open, and governed by no one.

The beauty of Nostr lies in its simplicity. It does not rely on massive infrastructure, corporate giants, or government oversight. It thrives on community, much like the early tribes that defined humanity.

We have come full circle. From wandering continents to building roads, bridges, and networks, our journey has always been about connection and finding our tribe.

As the African proverb reminds us, 'To get lost is to learn the way.' There is finally a way now.

But at the end of the day, it’s entirely up to you what kind of world you want to be part of.

Find your tribe. Build the future. Love them hard.

---

More info :

On those who played a role in the history of internet and computers
https://hiddenheroes.netguru.com/

@ e17e9a18:66d67a6b

We wrote this album to explain the inspiration behind Mutiny Brewing, and as a way to share the story of Bitcoin and freedom technologies like nostr. Through these songs, we’ve tried to capture every truth that we believe is essential to understand about money, freedom, trust, and human connection in the internet age. It’s our way of making these ideas real and relatable, and we hope it helps others see the power of taking control of their future through the systems we use.

01. "Tomorrow's Prices on Yesterday's Wage" explores the harsh reality of inflation. As central banks inflate the money supply, prices rise faster than wages, leaving us constantly falling behind. People, expecting prices to keep climbing, borrow more to buy sooner, pushing prices even higher in a vicious cycle. You're always a step behind, forced to pay tomorrow's inflated prices with yesterday's stagnant wages.

https://wavlake.com/track/76a6cd02-e876-4a37-b093-1fe919e9eabe

02. "Everybody Works For The Bank" exposes the hidden truth behind our fiat money system. When banks issue loans, they create new money from debt—but you must pay back both the principal and interest. That interest requires even more money, relying on others to borrow, creating an endless cycle of debt. If borrowing slows, the system falters and governments step in, printing more money to keep banks afloat. Ultimately, we’re all working to service debt, chained to the banks.

“Paying back what they create, working till I break” https://wavlake.com/track/4d94cb4b-ff3b-4423-be6a-03e0be8177d6

03. "Let My People Go" references Moses' demand for freedom but directly draws from Proverbs 6:1–5, exposing the danger of debt based money. Every dollar you hold is actually someone else's debt, making you personally liable—held in the hand of your debtor and at risk of their losses, which you ultimately pay for through inflation or higher taxes. As the song says, "The more you try to save it up, the deeper in you get." The wisdom of Proverbs urges immediate action, pleading urgently to escape this trap and free yourself, like a gazelle from a hunter.

https://wavlake.com/track/76214ff1-f8fd-45b0-a677-d9c285b1e7d6

04. "Mutiny Brewing" embodies Friedrich Hayek's insight: "I don't believe we shall ever have good money again before we take it out of the hands of government... we can't take it violently... all we can do is by some sly roundabout way introduce something they can't stop."

Inspired also by the Cypherpunk manifesto's rallying cry, "We will write the code", the song celebrates Bitcoin as exactly that unstoppable solution.

"Not here to break ya, just here to create our own little world where we determine our fate." https://wavlake.com/track/ba767fc8-6afc-4b0d-be64-259b340432f3

05. "Invisible Wealth" is inspired by The Sovereign Individual, a groundbreaking 1990s book that predicted the rise of digital money and explores how the return on violence shaped civilizations. The song references humanity's vulnerability since agriculture began—where stored wealth attracted violence, forcing reliance on larger governments for protection.

Today, digital privacy enabled by cryptography fundamentally changes this dynamic. When wealth is stored privately, secured by cryptographic keys, violence becomes ineffective. As the song emphasizes, "You can't bomb what you can't see." Cryptography dismantles traditional power structures, providing individuals true financial security, privacy, and freedom from exploitation.

“Violence is useless against cryptography” https://wavlake.com/track/648da3cc-d58c-4049-abe0-d22f9e61fef0

06. "Run A Node" is a rallying cry for Bitcoin's decentralisation. At its heart, it's about personal verification and choice: every node is a vote, every check’s a voice. By running the code yourself, you enforce the rules you choose to follow. This is true digital democracy. When everyone participates, there's no room for collusion, and authority comes directly from transparent code rather than blind trust.

"I verify, therefore I do." https://wavlake.com/track/ee11362b-2e84-4631-b05e-df6d8e6797f8

07. "Leverage is a Liar" warns against gambling with your wealth, but beneath the surface, it's a sharp critique of fractional reserve banking. Fractional reserves inflate asset prices, creating the illusion of wealth built on leverage. This system isn't sustainable and inevitably leads to collapse. Real wealth requires sound money, money that can't be inflated. Trying to gain more through leverage only feeds the lie.

"Watch it burn higher and higher—leverage is a liar." https://wavlake.com/track/67f9c39c-c5e1-4e15-b171-f1f5442f29a5

08. "Don't Get Rekt" serves as a stark warning about trusting custodians with your Bitcoin. Highlighting infamous collapses like Mt.Gox, Celsius, and FTX. These modern failures echo the 1933 Executive Order 6102, where the US government forcibly seized citizens' gold, banned its use, and then promptly devalued the currency exchanged for it. History shows clearly: trusting others with your wealth means risking losing it all.

"Your keys, your life, don't forget." https://wavlake.com/track/fbd9b46d-56fc-4496-bc4b-71dec2043705

09. "One Language" critiques the thousands of cryptocurrencies claiming to be revolutionary. Like languages, while anyone can invent one, getting people to actually use it is another story. Most of these cryptos are just affinity scams, centralized towers built on shaky foundations. Drawing from The Bitcoin Standard, the song argues money naturally gravitates toward a single unit, a universal language understood by all. When the dust settles, only genuine, decentralized currency remains.

"One voice speaking loud and clear, the rest will disappear." https://wavlake.com/track/22fb4705-9a01-4f65-9b68-7e8a77406a16

10. "Key To Life" is an anthem dedicated to nostr, the permissionless, unstoppable internet identity protocol. Unlike mainstream social media’s walled gardens, nostr places your identity securely in a cryptographic key, allowing you total control. Every message or action you sign proves authenticity, verifiable by anyone. This ensures censorship resistant communication, crucial for decentralised coordination around Bitcoin, keeping it free from centralised control.

"I got the key that sets me free—my truth is mine, authentically." https://wavlake.com/track/0d702284-88d2-4d3a-9059-960cc9286d3f

11. "Web Of Trust" celebrates genuine human connections built through protocols like nostr, free from corporate algorithms and their manipulative agendas. Instead of top down control, it champions grassroots sharing of information among trusted peers, ensuring truth and authenticity rise naturally. It's about reclaiming our digital lives, building real communities where trust isn't manufactured by machines, but created by people.

"My filter, my future, my choice to make, real connections no one can fake." https://wavlake.com/track/b383d4e2-feba-4d63-b9f6-10382683b54b

12. "Proof Of Work" is an anthem for fair value creation. In Bitcoin, new money is earned through real work, computing power and electricity spent to secure the network. No shortcuts, no favourites. It's a system grounded in natural law: you reap what you sow. Unlike fiat money, which rewards those closest to power and the printing press, Proof of Work ensures rewards flow to those who put in the effort. Paper castles built on easy money will crumble, but real work builds lasting worth.

"Real work makes real worth, that's the law of this earth." https://wavlake.com/track/01bb7327-0e77-490b-9985-b5ff4d4fdcfc

13. "Stay Humble" is a reminder that true wealth isn’t measured in coins or possessions. It’s grounded in the truth that a man’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions. Real wealth is the freedom to use your life and time for what is good and meaningful. When you let go of the obsession with numbers, you make room for gratitude, purpose, and peace. It's not about counting coins, it's about counting your blessings.

"Real wealth ain't what you own, it's gratitude that sets the tone." https://wavlake.com/track/3fdb2e9b-2f52-4def-a8c5-c6b3ee1cd194

@ 1bc70a01:24f6a411

The heading to be

Testing apps, a tireless quest, Click and swipe, then poke the rest. Crashing bugs and broken flows, Hidden deep where logic goes.

Specs in hand, we watch and trace, Each edge case in its hiding place. From flaky taps to loading spins, The war on regressions slowly wins.

Push the build, review the log, One more fix, then clear the fog. For in each test, truth will unfold— A quiet tale of stable code.

This has been a test. Thanks for tuning in.

• one
• two
• three

---

Listen a chill

Tranquility

And leisure

@ f57bac88:6045161e

پازل فناوری: ساختاری بی‌پایان

اینترنت و فناوری مثل موجوداتی زنده‌اند؛ همواره در حال رشد، تغییر و دگرگونی. برای ساده‌سازی، فرض می‌کنیم این پازل از سه بخش اصلی تشکیل شده:\ تکه‌های فعال (آنچه اکنون در دسترس ماست)،\ تکه‌های در حال توسعه (آنچه در راه است)، و\ تکه‌های خالی (آنچه جایش حس می‌شود).\ در ادامه، هر تکه را با جزئیات بررسی می‌کنم تا هیچ بخشی از این پازل از قلم نیفتد.

---

تکه‌های فعال: ستون‌های دنیای دیجیتال امروز

این تکه‌ها پایه‌های فناوری و اینترنت امروزی‌اند که بدون آن‌ها، زندگی مدرن قابل‌تصور نیست. تا بهار ۱۴۰۴، این بخش‌ها به بلوغ رسیده‌اند و هر روز در حال استفاده‌اند:

• شبکه‌های نوری پرسرعت: کابل‌هایی که داده‌ها را با سرعت بالا منتقل می‌کنند و اینترنتی پایدار و سریع را به خانه‌ها و شهرها رسانده‌اند.

• نسل پنجم ارتباطات سیار: فناوری ارتباطی جدیدی که با سرعت بالا و زمان پاسخ‌دهی بسیار کم، ابزارهای هوشمند را به هم متصل می‌کند.

• اینترنت ماهواره‌ای: پروژه‌هایی که اتصال اینترنت را به دورافتاده‌ترین نقاط کره زمین می‌برند.

• رایانش ابری: خدماتی بر پایه‌ی سرورهای اینترنتی که ذخیره‌سازی و پردازش داده‌ها را آسان کرده‌اند.

• شبکه‌های اجتماعی دیجیتال: فضاهایی که گفت‌وگو، اشتراک‌گذاری و ارتباط را به بستر اینترنت آورده‌اند.

• بازرگانی الکترونیکی: فروشگاه‌ها و بازارهایی که خرید و فروش را به شکل آنلاین و جهانی ممکن کرده‌اند.

• ابزارهای جست‌وجوی اینترنتی: موتورهایی که در کسری از ثانیه، اطلاعات سراسر دنیا را در اختیارمان می‌گذارند.

• پخش اینترنتی محتوا: سامانه‌هایی که فیلم، موسیقی و ویدیو را به صورت آنلاین و لحظه‌ای ارائه می‌دهند.

• برنامه‌های تلفن همراه: نرم‌افزارهایی که تجربه‌ی دیجیتال را شخصی، سریع و قابل‌حمل کرده‌اند.

• ابزارهای هوشمند خانگی: وسایلی که با اتصال به اینترنت، خانه را خودکار و هوشمند می‌کنند.

• هوش رایانه‌ای: سامانه‌هایی که توانایی درک، تحلیل و تصمیم‌گیری را به فناوری داده‌اند.

• یادگیری ماشینی: شیوه‌هایی که رایانه از داده‌ها آموخته و نتایج بهتری ارائه می‌دهد.

• تحلیل داده‌های عظیم: بررسی حجم زیادی از اطلاعات برای کشف الگوها و تصمیم‌گیری بهتر.

• امنیت فضای مجازی: ابزارهایی برای محافظت از داده‌ها و سیستم‌ها در برابر تهدیدها.

• زنجیره‌ی بلوکی: فناوری‌ای برای انجام تراکنش‌های امن و شفاف بدون واسطه.

• پول‌های دیجیتال: ارزهایی که مفهوم پول را وارد دنیای رایانه‌ای کرده‌اند.

• واقعیت مجازی: فناوری‌ای که با استفاده از نمایشگرهای ویژه، افراد را وارد دنیایی شبیه‌سازی‌شده می‌کند.

• واقعیت افزوده: افزودن اطلاعات دیجیتال به دنیای واقعی از طریق نمایشگرها یا گوشی همراه.

• خانه‌های هوشمند: سامانه‌هایی که با یک لمس، نور و گرمای خانه را مدیریت می‌کنند.

• فناوری‌های پوشیدنی: ابزارهایی که بر بدن پوشیده می‌شوند و سلامت و فعالیت ما را پایش می‌کنند.

این تکه‌ها، ستون‌های اصلی پازل‌اند که هر روز با آن‌ها سر و کار داریم، ولی هنوز جای پیشرفت دارند، از امنیت بهتر تا دسترسی برابرتر.

---

تکه‌های در حال توسعه: نوآوری‌هایی در آستانه‌ی شکوفایی

این بخش، آینده‌ی نزدیک و دور فناوری را به تصویر می‌کشد؛ تکه‌هایی که در آزمایشگاه‌ها و پروژه‌های پژوهشی در حال شکل‌گیری‌اند و به‌زودی به پازل افزوده می‌شوند:

• نسل ششم ارتباطات سیار: ارتباطاتی با سرعتی فراتر از نسل پنجم.

• رایانش کوانتومی: رایانه‌هایی که بر پایه‌ی قوانین فیزیک کوانتوم، مسائل بسیار پیچیده را در لحظه حل می‌کنند.

• پردازش در لبه‌ی شبکه: انتقال بخشی از محاسبات به نزدیک‌ترین نقطه به محل تولید داده برای کاهش تأخیر و مصرف انرژی.

• وسایل نقلیه‌ی بدون راننده: خودروهایی که با کمک هوش رایانه‌ای و حسگرها، به‌تنهایی حرکت می‌کنند.

• رابط مغز و ماشین: فناوری‌ای که فعالیت‌های مغزی را به رایانه‌ها و دستگاه‌ها متصل می‌کند.

• شبکه‌های هوشمند انرژی: سامانه‌هایی برای مدیریت بهینه‌ی مصرف برق و منابع انرژی.

• پزشکی دیجیتال پیشرفته: بهره‌گیری از فناوری برای تشخیص و درمان بهتر، مانند جراحی رباتیک یا تحلیل داده‌های سلامت.

• مواد واکنش‌پذیر: موادی که با تغییر شرایط محیطی واکنش نشان می‌دهند، مانند پارچه‌هایی که ترمیم می‌شوند.

• هوش فراگیر رایانه‌ای: هوشی که می‌تواند همچون انسان در زمینه‌های مختلف فکر کند و خلاق باشد.

این تکه‌ها نویدبخش آینده‌ای هیجان‌انگیزند، اما هنوز نیاز به زمان، سرمایه‌گذاری و زیرساخت دارند تا کامل شوند.

---

تکه‌های خالی: خلأهایی که باید پر شوند

این بخش، جاهایی را نشان می‌دهد که هنوز کامل ساخته نشده‌اند یا نیاز به توجه ویژه دارند. این تکه‌ها، چالش‌ها و فرصت‌های آینده‌اند:

• دسترسی برابر به اینترنت برای همه: فراهم کردن اینترنت پرسرعت در همه‌جا، حتی مناطق دورافتاده.

• حفاظت کامل از حریم خصوصی: فناوری‌هایی که جلوی هر نوع سوءاستفاده از اطلاعات شخصی را بگیرند.

• تأمین انرژی پایدار برای فناوری: بهره‌گیری از منابع انرژی پاک برای تأمین نیازهای روزافزون.

• قوانین جهانی هماهنگ در زمینه فناوری: مقررات مشترکی که هماهنگی جهانی را ممکن کنند.

• بازیافت کامل تجهیزات دیجیتال: فرآیندهایی برای بازیافت زباله‌های الکترونیکی بدون آسیب به محیط زیست.

• هوش مصنوعی مسئول و منصفانه: سامانه‌هایی که تصمیم‌هایی بدون تبعیض و ناعادلانه می‌گیرند.

• شبکه‌هایی مقاوم در برابر سانسور: ارتباطاتی که دولت‌ها یا نهادها نتوانند آن‌ها را محدود کنند.

• زیرساخت‌های مقاوم در برابر بلایا: سامانه‌هایی که حتی در شرایط بحرانی همچنان فعال بمانند.

• آموزش دیجیتال همگانی: آموزش‌هایی که برای همه، در هر سطح و سن، قابل‌دسترس باشد.

• ارتباط با فضا و سیارات دیگر: فناوری‌هایی برای برقراری ارتباط بین زمین و نقاط دوردست فضایی.

این تکه‌ها خلأهایی‌اند که پر شدنشان می‌تواند کل تصویر را دگرگون کند.

---

تصویر نهایی: پازلی که هرگز کامل نمی‌شود؟

پازل فناوری، با سه دسته‌ی فعال، در حال توسعه و خالی، ساختاری پویاست. هر تکه‌ی تازه‌ای که افزوده می‌شود، ممکن است به تکه‌های دیگری نیاز پیدا کند. مثلاً فناوری پول دیجیتال، بحث‌هایی تازه درباره‌ی قوانین مالی یا امنیت دیجیتالی به دنبال آورده. یا رشد هوش رایانه‌ای، نیاز به بحث‌های اخلاقی را مطرح کرده است.

امروز، بخش بزرگی از پازل سر جایش قرار گرفته، اما آینده، پر از ناشناخته‌هاست. از رایانه‌های کوانتومی گرفته تا خودروهای بدون راننده، از خلأهای دسترسی برابر تا دغدغه‌های امنیتی، همگی ما را به تفکر، تلاش و انتخاب‌هایی مهم فرا می‌خوانند.

شما چه فکر می‌کنید؟\ کدام تکه از این پازل از دید شما مهم‌تر است؟\ فکر می‌کنید چه چیزی هنوز از قلم افتاده؟\ نظرات خودتان را بنویسید تا این پازل را با هم کامل‌تر کنیم.

منابع

1. Simplilearn. 25 New Technology Trends for 2025: An overview of emerging technology trends in 2025.

2. GeeksforGeeks. Top 25 New Technology Trends in 2025: In-depth analysis of developing technologies.

3. Forbes. Top 10 Technology Trends For 2025: Key trend predictions by Forbes experts.

4. NKTelco. Internet Trends to Watch in 2025: A look at the future of internet and connectivity.

5. Exploding Topics. 13 Top Technology Trends (2024 & 2025): Examination of hot and upcoming tech topics.

6. IEEE Standards Association (IEEE SA). Six Connectivity and Telecom Trends to Watch for in 2025: A technical report on connectivity and telecommunications.

@ cff1720e:15c7e2b2

Die Protagonisten\ - Puschkin, russischer Dichter (unbeteiligt, da tot)\ - Putin, russischer Präsident, Erzschurke (wahlweise Satan)\ - Tino, Musiker mit fehlender Russland-Distanz     \ - Tobias, ein ebenfalls umstrittener Künstler (Querdenker)    \ - Anne, Redakteurin bei einer Provinz-Zeitung (BNN)   \ - DRG, Deutsch-Russische Gesellschaft Ettlingen

Ursprünglich ging es um Kunst. Die Deutsch-Russische Gesellschaft Ettlingen hatte für den Abend des 5. April zu einem Puschkin-Abend in das schöne Ettlinger Schloss eingeladen. Doch dann bekam die Presse Wind davon, und aus der geplanten Kulturveranstaltung wurde ein Politikum. Redakteurin Anne fühlte sich veranlasst den Musiker Tino einer strengen Gewissensprüfung zu unterziehen, da wachsame Bürger bzgl. seiner Person “Bedenken” geäußert haben sollen (potentieller Gemeinwohl- oder Demokratie-Gefährder?). Hier der Text ihrer Mail:\ \ Sehr geehrter Herr Eisbrenner, \ am Samstag kommen Sie für einen Auftritt nach Ettlingen. Im Vorfeld sind nun Bürger auf uns zugekommen mit Bedenken. Sie als Künstler seien „zu russlandfreundlich“.\ Gerne möchten wir natürlich auch Sie dazu zu Wort kommen lassen, um das sachlich einzuordnen.\ Ich freue mich, wenn Sie mir deswegen kurz folgende Fragen beantworten könnten:\ \ • Wie würden Sie sich selbst politisch einordnen? \ • Auf einer Veranstaltung 2023 bei der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung haben Sie sich laut Medien-Berichten lobend über Putin geäußert. („Eisbrenner lobt den russischen Präsidenten Wladimir Putin, wie lange sich dieser im Konflikt mit Ukraine und Nato gezügelt habe. (…) Respekt äußert Eisbrenner auch für einen Kurswechsel unter Putin.“) Können Sie das bestätigen? Was ist heute Ihre Meinung über den russischen Präsidenten?\ • Sie haben zwei Mal am Festival „Road to Yalta“ in Moskau teilgenommen. Die Veranstalter beschreiben Sie als „Öffentlichen Fürsprecher für Russland“. Besteht die Gefahr, dass Sie von Russland instrumentalisiert werden?\ \ Um aktuell berichten zu können, brauchen wir Ihre Antworten bis morgen Mittag, 14.30 Uhr.\ Herzlichen Dank im Voraus.\ \ Mit freundlichen Grüßen \ Anne Herder\ Badische Neueste Nachrichten\ \ Angesichts der deutschen Beteiligung am Stellvertreterkrieg gegen Russland war die Wachsamkeit von Bürgern und Regionalpresse lobenswert, schließlich ging es darum den Auftritt eines “Putin-Freundes” zu verhindern. Leider hat die aufmerksame Öffentlichkeit dabei völlig übersehen dass auch Tinos musikalischer Partner Tobias ein umstrittener Künstler mit Kontakten zu “Querdenkern” ist (Wikipedia). Da der Musiker Tino in seiner Antwortmail an die Redakteurin Anne weder Bedauern noch Reue erkennen ließ, veröffentlichte sie pflichtschuldig am 4. April einen Artikel mit einer Warnung vor “russischer Propaganda”.

Trotz dieser drohenden Gefahr wollte die DRG Ettlingen sich weder vom Musiker Tino distanzieren noch die Veranstaltung absagen, mit der fragwürdigen Begründung “… die allermeisten Menschen wollen zusammen in Frieden leben."\ \ Der Puschkin-Abend fand also statt, und es sollte sogar noch schlimmer kommen, wie wir aus einer weiteren Mail von Redakteurin Anne nach der Veranstaltung erfahren können.

\ Sehr geehrter Herr Eisbrenner,\ vielen Dank für Ihre ausführliche Rückmeldung. Es freut mich zu hören, dass die Veranstaltung ein Erfolg war und der Ankündigungsartikel dazu beitragen konnte, weiteres Publikum zu gewinnen.  …\ \ … Abschließend möchte ich betonen, dass es uns ein Anliegen ist, fair und ausgewogen zu berichten. Ich habe in meinem Artikel sowohl die kritischen Stimmen als auch die Positionen von Ihnen und dem Veranstalter berücksichtigt. Ziel war es, ein ausgewogenes Bild zu vermitteln und den Lesern die Möglichkeit zu geben, sich selbst eine Meinung zu bilden. \ \ Es ist nicht unsere Absicht, Personen aufgrund ihrer politischen Äußerungen oder künstlerischen Engagements zu diffamieren. Wir sind uns der Verantwortung bewusst, die wir als Medium tragen.\ \ Die tapfere Redakteurin knickte ein, beglückwünschte den “Putin-Freund” für die erfolgreiche Veranstaltung, und erklärt ihr journalistisches Verständnis damit “den Lesern die Möglichkeit zu geben, sich selbst eine Meinung zu bilden.” Keine Einordnung mehr, keine Haltung, keine kritische Distanz? Die Russland-Versteher hatten gesiegt und der Musiker Tino musste sich in seiner Antwortmail sogar bemühen nicht zu viel Nähe entstehen zu lassen: … darum möchte ich Ihnen auch nochmal und dieses Mal kurz antworten, um uns beide nicht für die Zukunft zu einer Art langjährigen „Brieffreundschaft“ zu nötigen.

Damit scheint sich Journalistin Anne nicht für höhere Aufgaben empfohlen zu haben.\ \ Resümee: Kultur kennt keine Grenzen. Deutschland ist noch nicht kriegstüchtig. Zum Glück!

Hinweis: die Inhalte der Mails sind sehr informativ, deshalb befinden sie sich in voller Länge im Anhang

Fortsetzung: eine Vertiefung des Themas gibt es im Artikel "Der Brückenbauer"

Quellen:

https://www.eisbrenner.de/        \ https://www.eisbrenner.de/programm/puschkin/  \ https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=130806 \ https://bnn.de/karlsruhe/ettlingen/kritik-an-konzert-im-ettlinger-schloss-wo-steht-tino-eisbrenner-politisch  \ (Artikel hinter einer Paywall)\ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobias_Morgenstern \ https://drg-ettlingen.de/ 

\ Hier die Mails in voller Länge

https://route96.pareto.space/c20c13782fbd7d93b590222cb7ca7c4e1d1b485828f52e8946d36c7d2ebe376d.pdf

@ cff1720e:15c7e2b2

Zunächst einmal gilt es zu konstatieren, dass beide Optionen der Frage nicht faktisch feststellbar sind. Der Status Putin-Freund würde zumindest die Tatsache persönlicher Treffen in der Vergangenheit voraussetzen, darüber hat bisher kein Medium berichtet, also scheint es keine gegeben zu haben. Indes gibt es reichlich dokumentierte Äußerungen und Handlungen von Tino Eisbrenner die den symbolischen Begriff "Brückenbauer" rechtfertigen.

“Das zeigt mir, dass mein Glaube an Dialog, Diplomatie und (Völker)verständigung nicht unberechtigt ist.” \ (aus einer Mail an Anne Herder)

Ein zentrales Thema seiner künstlerischen Arbeit seit über einem Jahrzehnt ist die Warnung vor Völkerhass und Kriegsgefahr.

“Sie sagen ja, Sie bezögen keine Stellung. Und doch sind wir in Deutschland in eine Situation geraten, in der dieser militärische Ausdruck, Stellung beziehen, immer mehr zur Realität wird. Wir ziehen Gräben und bauen Stellungen aus, die wir dann beziehen. Durch unbedachte Überschriften, nicht eindeutige Begriffe, vermiedene Kontextualisierung und Informationen, die uns nicht gegeben werden, während wir auf Kriegstüchtigkeit eingestimmt werden und Puschkin, wenn wir nicht achtgeben, nie kennenlernen.” (aus einer Mail an Anne Herder)

„Vom Pulverfass runter!“: Tino Eisbrenner für Frieden mit Russland  5. April 2019\ https://www.textstelle.news/2019/04/05/liedermacher-tino-eisbrenner-frieden-mit-russland/  

Ergänzend zu seinen Liedern und Interviews veröffentlichte Eisbrenner das Buch "Das Lied vom Frieden". https://shop.strato.de/epages/187541.sf/de_DE/?ObjectPath=/Shops/187541/Products/4657

\ Er wolle mit seinem Buch eine Diskussion anregen und dass in der Gesellschaft „noch einmal nachgedacht und diskutiert wird“. Beides ist aktuell höchst notwendig, da Politik und Medien systematisch eine gefährliche Kriegshysterie schüren, die bereits jetzt fatale Folgen für die Gesellschaft zeitigt.

"Dass einem Songschreiber, der sich für eine bessere Verständigung zwischen Westeuropa und Russland ausspricht, nicht nur Blumen auf den Weg gestreut werden, erfährt man auch aus dem vorliegendem Buch. Aber vor allem beschreibt Tino Eisbrenner seine Erlebnisse und Eindrücke auf den »Musik statt Krieg«-Tourneen, die er seit Ende 2015 durch Deutschland, Österreich und Osteuropa gemacht hat. Russland, Georgien, Belarus, Polen, Tschechien hat er viele Male mit Musik bereist und dabei interessante Menschen und deren Sicht auf das Leben, die Heimat, ihre Geschichte und auch auf Deutschland kennengelernt."

Eisbrenner belässt es nicht bei Diskussionen, er engagiert sich für vielfältige Friedens-Initiativen ungeachtet persönlicher Anfeindungen und beruflicher Nachteile. Er hat nicht nur das »Lied vom Frieden« als Song getextet, sondern lebt es auch mit dem, was er als Künstler initiiert und (re)präsentiert. Seit sechzehn Jahren veranstaltet er sein eigenes Festival »Musik statt Krieg«.

\ http://musik-statt-krieg.com/index.html

@ bf95e1a4:ebdcc848

This is a part of the Bitcoin Infinity Academy course on Knut Svanholm's book Bitcoin: Sovereignty Through Mathematics. For more information, check out our Geyser page!

An Immaculate Conception

Some concepts in nature are harder for us humans to understand than others. How complex things can emerge out of simpler ones is one of those concepts. A termite colony, for instance, has a complex cooling system at its lower levels. No single termite knows how it works. Completely unaware of the end results, they build complex mounds and nests, shelter tubes to protect their paths, and networks of subterranean tunnels to connect their dirt cities. Everything seems organized and designed, but it is not. Evolution has equipped the termite with a pheromone receptor that tells the termite what task he ought to engage himself in by simply counting the number of neighboring termites doing the same thing. If there’s a surplus of workers in an area, nearby termites become warriors, and so on. Complex structures emerge from simple rules. The fractal patterns found all around nature are another example. Fractals look complex, but in reality, they’re not. They’re basically algorithms — the same pattern, repeated over and over again with a slightly modified starting point. The human brain is an excellent example of a complex thing that evolved out of simpler things, and we humans still have a hard time accepting that it wasn’t designed. Religions, which themselves are emergent systems spawned out of human interaction, have come up with a plethora of explanations for how we came to be. All sorts of wild origin stories have been more widely accepted than the simple explanation that our complexities just emerged out of simpler things following a set of rules that nature itself provided our world with.

Complex systems emerge out of human interactions all the time. The phone in your pocket is the result of a century of mostly free global market competition, and no single human could ever have come up with the entire thing. The device, together with its internet connection, is capable of a lot more than the sum of its individual parts. A pocket-sized gadget that can grant instant access to almost all of the world’s literature, music, and film, which fits in your pocket, was an unthinkable science fiction a mere twenty years ago. Bitcoin, first described in Satoshi Nakamoto’s whitepaper ten years before these words were written, was designed to be decentralized. Still, it wasn’t until years later that the network started to show actual proof of this. Sound money, or absolute digital scarcity, emerged out of the network not only because of its technical design. How Bitcoin’s first ten years actually unfolded played a huge part in how true decentralization could emerge, and this is also the main reason why the experiment cannot be replicated. Scarcity on the internet could only be invented once. Satoshi’s disappearance was Bitcoin’s first step towards true decentralization. No marketing whatsoever and the randomness of who hopped onto the train first were the steps that followed. Bitcoin truly had an immaculate conception.

The network has shown a remarkable resistance to change over the last few years especially, and its current state might be its last incarnation given the size of the network and the 95% agreement threshold in its consensus rules. It might never change again. In that case, an entirely new, complex life form will have emerged out of a simple set of rules. Even if small upgrades are implemented in the future, the 21 million coin supply cap is set in stone forever. Bitcoin is not for humans to have opinions about — it exists regardless of what anyone thinks about it, and it ought to be studied rather than discussed. We don’t know what true scarcity and a truly global, anonymous free market will do to our species yet, but we are about to find out. It is naïve to think otherwise. Various futurists and doomsday prophets have been focused on the dangers of the impending general artificial intelligence singularity lately, warning us about the point of no return, whereupon an artificial intelligence will be able to improve itself faster than any human could. Such a scenario could, as news anchor Ron Burgundy would have put it, escalate quickly. This may or may not be of real concern to us, but meanwhile, right under our noses, another type of unstoppable digital life has emerged, and it is already changing the behavior and preferences of millions of people around the globe. This is probably bad news for big corporations and governments but good news for the little guy looking for a little freedom. At least, that’s what those of us who lean towards the ideas of the Austrian school of economics believe. This time around, we will find out whether this is the case or not. No one knows what it will lead to and what new truths will emerge out of this new reality.

Unlike the termite, we humans are able to experience the grandeur of our progress. We can look in awe at the Sistine Chapel or the pyramids, and we can delve into the technicalities and brief history of Bitcoin and discover new ways of thinking about value along the way. Money is the language in which we express value to each other through space and time. Now, that language is spoken by computers. Value expressed in this language can’t be diluted through inflation or counterfeiting any longer. It is a language that is borderless, permissionless, peer-to-peer, anonymous (if you have the skills), unreplicable, completely scarce, non-dilutable, unchangeable, untouchable, undeniable, fungible, and free for everyone on Earth to use. It is a language for the future and it emerged out of a specific set of events in the past. All languages are examples of complex systems emerging out of simpler things, and Bitcoin evolved just as organically as any other human language did.

Decentralization is hard to achieve. Really hard. When it comes to claims of decentralization, a “don’t trust, verify” approach to the validity of such claims will help you filter out the noise. So, how can the validity of Bitcoin’s decentralization be verified? It’s a tricky question because decentralization is not a binary thing, like life or death, but rather a very difficult concept to define. However, the most fundamental concepts in Bitcoin, like the 21 million cap on coin issuance or the ten-minute block interval as a result of the difficulty adjustment and the Proof of Work algorithm, have not changed since very early on in the history of the network. This lack of change, which is arguably Bitcoin’s biggest strength, has been achieved through the consensus rules, which define what the blockchain is. Some special mechanisms (for example, BIP9) are sometimes used to deploy changes to the consensus rules. These mechanisms use a threshold when counting blocks that signal for a certain upgrade. For example, the upgrade “Segregated Witness” activated in a node when 95% or more of the blocks in a retarget period signaled support. Bitcoin has displayed a remarkable immutability through the years, and it is highly unlikely that this would have been the case if the game-theoretical mechanisms that enable its decentralized governance model hadn’t worked, given the many incentives to cheat that always seem to corrupt monetary systems. In other words, the longer the system seems to be working, the higher the likelihood that it actually does.

Satoshi set in stone the length of the halving period — a very important aspect of Bitcoin’s issuance schedule and initial distribution. During the first four years of Bitcoin’s existence, fifty new coins were issued every ten minutes up until the first block reward halving four years later. Every four years, this reward is halved so that the issuance rate goes down by fifty percent. This effectively means that half of all the Bitcoin that will ever exist was mined during the first four years of the network’s life, one fourth during its next four years, and so on. At the time of writing, we’re a little more than a year from the third halving. After that, only 6.25 Bitcoin will be minted every ten minutes as opposed to 50, which was the initial rate. What this seems to do is to create hype cycles for Bitcoin’s adoption. Every time the price of Bitcoin booms and then busts down to a level above where it started, a hype cycle takes place. Bitcoin had no marketing whatsoever, so awareness of it had to be spread through some other mechanism. When a bull run begins, people start talking about it, which leads to even more people buying due to fear of missing out (FOMO), which inevitably causes the price to rise even more rapidly. This leads to more FOMO, and on and on the bull market goes until it suddenly ends, and the price crashes down to somewhere around, or slightly above, the level it was at before the bull run started. Unlike what is true for most other assets, Bitcoin never really crashes all the way. Why? Because every time a hype cycle occurs, some more people learn about Bitcoin’s fundamentals and manage to resist the urge to sell, even when almost all hope seems lost. They understand that these bull markets are a reoccurring thing due to the nature of the protocol. These cycles create new waves of evangelists who start promoting Bitcoin simply because of what they stand to gain from a price increase. In a sense, the protocol itself pays for its own promotion in this way. This organic marketing creates a lot of noise and confusion, too, as a lot of people who don’t seem to understand how Bitcoin works are often very outspoken about it despite their lack of knowledge. Red herrings, such as altcoins and Bitcoin forks, are then weeded out naturally during bear markets. Every time a bull market happens, a new generation of Bitcoiners is born.

The four-year period between halvings seems to serve a deliberate purpose. Satoshi could just as well have programmed a smooth issuance curve into the Bitcoin protocol, but he didn’t. As events unfold, it seems that he had good reason for this since these hype cycles provide a very effective onboarding mechanism, and they seem to be linked to the halvings. They certainly make Bitcoin volatile, but remember that in this early stage, the volatility is needed in order for these hype cycles to happen. Later on, when Bitcoin’s stock-to-flow ratio is higher, the seas will calm, and its volatility level will go down. In truth, it already has. The latest almost 80% price drop was far from the worst we’ve seen in Bitcoin. This technology is still in its infancy, and it is very likely that we’ll see a lot more volatility before mainstream adoption, or hyperbitcoinization, truly happens.

About the Bitcoin Infinity Academy

The Bitcoin Infinity Academy is an educational project built around Knut Svanholm’s books about Bitcoin and Austrian Economics. Each week, a whole chapter from one of the books is released for free on Highlighter, accompanied by a video in which Knut and Luke de Wolf discuss that chapter’s ideas. You can join the discussions by signing up for one of the courses on our Geyser page. Signed books, monthly calls, and lots of other benefits are also available.

@ 4898fe02:4ae46cb0

Directory

📖 Day 1 - In the Beginning, an Idea...\ 📖 Day 2 - When Money Dies\ 📖 Day 3 - One Coin to Rule them All\ 📖 Day 4 - Transacting Adversarially pt. 1\ 📖 Day 5 - Transacting Adversarially pt. 2\ 📖 Day 6 - Not your Keys not your Coin\ 📖 Day 7 - The Seventh Day

---

Foreword

This is more than a curated list of articles.

This is more than a guide.

It is not a how-to or tutorial.

This is the first unschooled course syllabus and it is based entirely on the peer-reviewed work published by Stackers.

In undertaking such work as building a beginners course in bitcoin, one might stop and appreciate the plethora of other Bitcoin courses that live in the blogs of various company sites, such as those you will find on exchanges, wallet providers and the like. These are great, but the spirit of Bitcoin is in its community, so why not learn from the community directly?

Course Intro

What you will find below is a selection of some of the best that has been written by the thriving community on Stacker News. It is being referred to here as a course syllabus for the reason that it is intended to be used as a guide that you can follow as you take your first steps into the rabbit hole. Exploring new spaces online, especially those surrounding Bitcoin, can be intimidating and anxiety inducing, so rest easy and let this syllabus be your guide.

Included are a carefully selected list articles, spread across seven days of learning. Each day also has included the learning outcomes for that day and post-reading reflections.

It is recommended you come ready to learn, with a note-taking implement/software and an open mind. Feel free to share your responses to the questions in the comments. The discussion questions are obviously optional, but have been written with the purpose of prompting further engagement in the materials.

Target Audience

This particular Unschooled course is geared toward the intellectually curious and self-directed (much like later iterations will be).

No prior knowledge of Bitcoin is required as the course has been designed to suit the absolute bitcoin initiate.

Expected outcomes

By the end of the seven-days, learners will have

• developed an awareness of peer to peer electronic cash
• engaged some of the philosophical currents in the Bitcoin community
• analyzed the quesiton: why Bitcoin not crypto?
• reflected on the important concepts in Bitcoin such as wallets, UTXO's, Nodes and Lightning Network
• answered the question: what is KYC and AML?
• seen the relevance of the phrase "not your keys, not your bitcoin"

A Final note by way of Introduction

The course is designed to familiarize you with the technology that you will ultimately use to interact with the Bitcoin network, not to give investment advice. It is recommended that you finish the course before making any financial decisions, as there is important insight to be gained in all seven days.

Lastly, nothing stated herein is intended as financial advice.

Let's begin!

⚡️Go to Day 1⚡️

---

@ 73dc15e0:b7a84244

プロローグ

童貞こと薄（すすき）　仙人（せんにん）29歳。ここに眠る。「RIP」。29年間ずっと不運だった。親が仙人なんて名前を付けるから。学校では薄い仙人で「はげ仙人」なんてよばれるし、会社は倒産し、家は燃え、さっきトラックで引かれたところだ。そして、今「自称邪心」に次の魔王になってほしいと頼まれている。

―「なんで俺がそんなことしなきゃいけないのだ。」

「君には普通の人間よりも欲が何倍も大きい。ほんとは君の世界では収まらないぐらいだよ。」

―「異世界に行くのはいいとして、なんで魔王なんだ？」

「一つは、さっきも言った通り、君の欲は大きい。二つ目はもうすぐ現魔王がいなくなるからだよ。」

―「勇者にでも殺されたか？」

「いや、勇者と魔王が結婚した。」

―「は？」意味がわからない。勇者は魔王を倒すものではないのか？

「いなくなるというよりは魔王をやめるという表現のほうが正しかったかな。」

邪神によると勇者と魔王が結婚し、現魔王は魔王をやめるので、勇者と魔王の子供に転生し、次の新たな魔王になってほしいとのことだった。

人族と魔族（エルフ、ドワーフ、悪魔など）がこの世界にはあり、人族は聖神、魔族は

邪神が保護しているそうで、人と魔族は大昔から敵対しているそうだ。

聖神は魔族を忌み嫌っているので、魔族を統べる物がいなくなればいつ人族が襲ってくるかわからない。

人族には個別スキル（怪力、俊足など）には一般スキルと固有スキルがある。

固有スキルは世界に一人しかもっておらず、使用者が死ぬと新しく生まれてきた誰かがその固有スキルを手にする。固有スキルは5000万人に１人ぐらいの割合だそうだ。

一般スキルは固有スキルと違い、スキルがかぶることはよくあるそうだ。

魔族は種族スキルがある。種族スキルとはその種族が全員同じスキルをもっている。

魔族は固有スキルや個別スキルがない代わり人よりも各ステータスが高い。

俺は邪神に恩恵を3つもらった。一つは「超再生」。これは怪我や魔力、体力を瞬時に再生させてくれるチート能力だ。2つ目は「代償」腕や心臓などの代償をつくることによって自分を強化したり、新しく武器を作ることができる。この能力は一つ目の「超再生」と組み合わせることでバグをうみだすことができる。3つ目は「入れ替え」これは、さわったことのある物や人との場所を入れ替えることができる。

この三つの恩恵で異世界を俺は生き抜いてやる。

@ f1e78daa:124e0e56

今日はテストです。

@ bf95e1a4:ebdcc848

This is a part of the Bitcoin Infinity Academy course on Knut Svanholm's book Bitcoin: Sovereignty Through Mathematics. For more information, check out our Geyser page!

An Immaculate Conception

Some concepts in nature are harder for us humans to understand than others. How complex things can emerge out of simpler ones is one of those concepts. A termite colony, for instance, has a complex cooling system at its lower levels. No single termite knows how it works. Completely unaware of the end results, they build complex mounds and nests, shelter tubes to protect their paths, and networks of subterranean tunnels to connect their dirt cities. Everything seems organized and designed, but it is not. Evolution has equipped the termite with a pheromone receptor that tells the termite what task he ought to engage himself in by simply counting the number of neighboring termites doing the same thing. If there’s a surplus of workers in an area, nearby termites become warriors, and so on. Complex structures emerge from simple rules. The fractal patterns found all around nature are another example. Fractals look complex, but in reality, they’re not. They’re basically algorithms — the same pattern, repeated over and over again with a slightly modified starting point. The human brain is an excellent example of a complex thing that evolved out of simpler things, and we humans still have a hard time accepting that it wasn’t designed. Religions, which themselves are emergent systems spawned out of human interaction, have come up with a plethora of explanations for how we came to be. All sorts of wild origin stories have been more widely accepted than the simple explanation that our complexities just emerged out of simpler things following a set of rules that nature itself provided our world with.

Complex systems emerge out of human interactions all the time. The phone in your pocket is the result of a century of mostly free global market competition, and no single human could ever have come up with the entire thing. The device, together with its internet connection, is capable of a lot more than the sum of its individual parts. A pocket-sized gadget that can grant instant access to almost all of the world’s literature, music, and film, which fits in your pocket, was an unthinkable science fiction a mere twenty years ago. Bitcoin, first described in Satoshi Nakamoto’s whitepaper ten years before these words were written, was designed to be decentralized. Still, it wasn’t until years later that the network started to show actual proof of this. Sound money, or absolute digital scarcity, emerged out of the network not only because of its technical design. How Bitcoin’s first ten years actually unfolded played a huge part in how true decentralization could emerge, and this is also the main reason why the experiment cannot be replicated. Scarcity on the internet could only be invented once. Satoshi’s disappearance was Bitcoin’s first step towards true decentralization. No marketing whatsoever and the randomness of who hopped onto the train first were the steps that followed. Bitcoin truly had an immaculate conception.

The network has shown a remarkable resistance to change over the last few years especially, and its current state might be its last incarnation given the size of the network and the 95% agreement threshold in its consensus rules. It might never change again. In that case, an entirely new, complex life form will have emerged out of a simple set of rules. Even if small upgrades are implemented in the future, the 21 million coin supply cap is set in stone forever. Bitcoin is not for humans to have opinions about — it exists regardless of what anyone thinks about it, and it ought to be studied rather than discussed. We don’t know what true scarcity and a truly global, anonymous free market will do to our species yet, but we are about to find out. It is naïve to think otherwise. Various futurists and doomsday prophets have been focused on the dangers of the impending general artificial intelligence singularity lately, warning us about the point of no return, whereupon an artificial intelligence will be able to improve itself faster than any human could. Such a scenario could, as news anchor Ron Burgundy would have put it, escalate quickly. This may or may not be of real concern to us, but meanwhile, right under our noses, another type of unstoppable digital life has emerged, and it is already changing the behavior and preferences of millions of people around the globe. This is probably bad news for big corporations and governments but good news for the little guy looking for a little freedom. At least, that’s what those of us who lean towards the ideas of the Austrian school of economics believe. This time around, we will find out whether this is the case or not. No one knows what it will lead to and what new truths will emerge out of this new reality.

Unlike the termite, we humans are able to experience the grandeur of our progress. We can look in awe at the Sistine Chapel or the pyramids, and we can delve into the technicalities and brief history of Bitcoin and discover new ways of thinking about value along the way. Money is the language in which we express value to each other through space and time. Now, that language is spoken by computers. Value expressed in this language can’t be diluted through inflation or counterfeiting any longer. It is a language that is borderless, permissionless, peer-to-peer, anonymous (if you have the skills), unreplicable, completely scarce, non-dilutable, unchangeable, untouchable, undeniable, fungible, and free for everyone on Earth to use. It is a language for the future and it emerged out of a specific set of events in the past. All languages are examples of complex systems emerging out of simpler things, and Bitcoin evolved just as organically as any other human language did.

Decentralization is hard to achieve. Really hard. When it comes to claims of decentralization, a “don’t trust, verify” approach to the validity of such claims will help you filter out the noise. So, how can the validity of Bitcoin’s decentralization be verified? It’s a tricky question because decentralization is not a binary thing, like life or death, but rather a very difficult concept to define. However, the most fundamental concepts in Bitcoin, like the 21 million cap on coin issuance or the ten-minute block interval as a result of the difficulty adjustment and the Proof of Work algorithm, have not changed since very early on in the history of the network. This lack of change, which is arguably Bitcoin’s biggest strength, has been achieved through the consensus rules, which define what the blockchain is. Some special mechanisms (for example, BIP9) are sometimes used to deploy changes to the consensus rules. These mechanisms use a threshold when counting blocks that signal for a certain upgrade. For example, the upgrade “Segregated Witness” activated in a node when 95% or more of the blocks in a retarget period signaled support. Bitcoin has displayed a remarkable immutability through the years, and it is highly unlikely that this would have been the case if the game-theoretical mechanisms that enable its decentralized governance model hadn’t worked, given the many incentives to cheat that always seem to corrupt monetary systems. In other words, the longer the system seems to be working, the higher the likelihood that it actually does.

Satoshi set in stone the length of the halving period — a very important aspect of Bitcoin’s issuance schedule and initial distribution. During the first four years of Bitcoin’s existence, fifty new coins were issued every ten minutes up until the first block reward halving four years later. Every four years, this reward is halved so that the issuance rate goes down by fifty percent. This effectively means that half of all the Bitcoin that will ever exist was mined during the first four years of the network’s life, one fourth during its next four years, and so on. At the time of writing, we’re a little more than a year from the third halving. After that, only 6.25 Bitcoin will be minted every ten minutes as opposed to 50, which was the initial rate. What this seems to do is to create hype cycles for Bitcoin’s adoption. Every time the price of Bitcoin booms and then busts down to a level above where it started, a hype cycle takes place. Bitcoin had no marketing whatsoever, so awareness of it had to be spread through some other mechanism. When a bull run begins, people start talking about it, which leads to even more people buying due to fear of missing out (FOMO), which inevitably causes the price to rise even more rapidly. This leads to more FOMO, and on and on the bull market goes until it suddenly ends, and the price crashes down to somewhere around, or slightly above, the level it was at before the bull run started. Unlike what is true for most other assets, Bitcoin never really crashes all the way. Why? Because every time a hype cycle occurs, some more people learn about Bitcoin’s fundamentals and manage to resist the urge to sell, even when almost all hope seems lost. They understand that these bull markets are a reoccurring thing due to the nature of the protocol. These cycles create new waves of evangelists who start promoting Bitcoin simply because of what they stand to gain from a price increase. In a sense, the protocol itself pays for its own promotion in this way. This organic marketing creates a lot of noise and confusion, too, as a lot of people who don’t seem to understand how Bitcoin works are often very outspoken about it despite their lack of knowledge. Red herrings, such as altcoins and Bitcoin forks, are then weeded out naturally during bear markets. Every time a bull market happens, a new generation of Bitcoiners is born.

The four-year period between halvings seems to serve a deliberate purpose. Satoshi could just as well have programmed a smooth issuance curve into the Bitcoin protocol, but he didn’t. As events unfold, it seems that he had good reason for this since these hype cycles provide a very effective onboarding mechanism, and they seem to be linked to the halvings. They certainly make Bitcoin volatile, but remember that in this early stage, the volatility is needed in order for these hype cycles to happen. Later on, when Bitcoin’s stock-to-flow ratio is higher, the seas will calm, and its volatility level will go down. In truth, it already has. The latest almost 80% price drop was far from the worst we’ve seen in Bitcoin. This technology is still in its infancy, and it is very likely that we’ll see a lot more volatility before mainstream adoption, or hyperbitcoinization, truly happens.

About the Bitcoin Infinity Academy

The Bitcoin Infinity Academy is an educational project built around Knut Svanholm’s books about Bitcoin and Austrian Economics. Each week, a whole chapter from one of the books is released for free on Highlighter, accompanied by a video in which Knut and Luke de Wolf discuss that chapter’s ideas. You can join the discussions by signing up for one of the courses on our Geyser page. Signed books, monthly calls, and lots of other benefits are also available.

@ fd06f542:8d6d54cd

Warning unrecommended: deprecated in favor of NIP-27

NIP-08

Handling Mentions

final unrecommended optional

This document standardizes the treatment given by clients of inline mentions of other events and pubkeys inside the content of text_notes.

Clients that want to allow tagged mentions they MUST show an autocomplete component or something analogous to that whenever the user starts typing a special key (for example, "@") or presses some button to include a mention etc -- or these clients can come up with other ways to unambiguously differentiate between mentions and normal text.

Once a mention is identified, for example, the pubkey 27866e9d854c78ae625b867eefdfa9580434bc3e675be08d2acb526610d96fbe, the client MUST add that pubkey to the .tags with the tag p, then replace its textual reference (inside .content) with the notation #[index] in which "index" is equal to the 0-based index of the related tag in the tags array.

The same process applies for mentioning event IDs.

A client that receives a text_note event with such #[index] mentions in its .content CAN do a search-and-replace using the actual contents from the .tags array with the actual pubkey or event ID that is mentioned, doing any desired context augmentation (for example, linking to the pubkey or showing a preview of the mentioned event contents) it wants in the process.

Where #[index] has an index that is outside the range of the tags array or points to a tag that is not an e or p tag or a tag otherwise declared to support this notation, the client MUST NOT perform such replacement or augmentation, but instead display it as normal text.

@ f1e78daa:124e0e56

プロローグ

童貞こと薄（すすき）　仙人（せんにん）29歳。ここに眠る。「RIP」。29年間ずっと不運だった。親が仙人なんて名前を付けるから。学校では薄い仙人で「はげ仙人」なんてよばれるし、会社は倒産し、家は燃え、さっきトラックで引かれたところだ。そして、今「自称邪心」に次の魔王になってほしいと頼まれている。

―「なんで俺がそんなことしなきゃいけないのだ。」

「君には普通の人間よりも欲が何倍も大きい。ほんとは君の世界では収まらないぐらいだよ。」

―「異世界に行くのはいいとして、なんで魔王なんだ？」

「一つは、さっきも言った通り、君の欲は大きい。二つ目はもうすぐ現魔王がいなくなるからだよ。」

―「勇者にでも殺されたか？」

「いや、勇者と魔王が結婚した。」

―「は？」意味がわからない。勇者は魔王を倒すものではないのか？

「いなくなるというよりは魔王をやめるという表現のほうが正しかったかな。」

邪神によると勇者と魔王が結婚し、現魔王は魔王をやめるので、勇者と魔王の子供に転生し、次の新たな魔王になってほしいとのことだった。

人族と魔族（エルフ、ドワーフ、悪魔など）がこの世界にはあり、人族は聖神、魔族は

邪神が保護しているそうで、人と魔族は大昔から敵対しているそうだ。

聖神は魔族を忌み嫌っているので、魔族を統べる物がいなくなればいつ人族が襲ってくるかわからない。

人族には個別スキル（怪力、俊足など）には一般スキルと固有スキルがある。

固有スキルは世界に一人しかもっておらず、使用者が死ぬと新しく生まれてきた誰かがその固有スキルを手にする。固有スキルは5000万人に１人ぐらいの割合だそうだ。

一般スキルは固有スキルと違い、スキルがかぶることはよくあるそうだ。

魔族は種族スキルがある。種族スキルとはその種族が全員同じスキルをもっている。

魔族は固有スキルや個別スキルがない代わり人よりも各ステータスが高い。

俺は邪神に恩恵を3つもらった。一つは「超再生」。これは怪我や魔力、体力を瞬時に再生させてくれるチート能力だ。2つ目は「代償」腕や心臓などの代償をつくることによって自分を強化したり、新しく武器を作ることができる。この能力は一つ目の「超再生」と組み合わせることでバグをうみだすことができる。3つ目は「入れ替え」これは、さわったことのある物や人との場所を入れ替えることができる。

この三つの恩恵で異世界を俺は生き抜いてやる。

@ f1e78daa:124e0e56

プロローグ

童貞こと薄（すすき）　仙人（せんにん）29歳。ここに眠る。「RIP」。29年間ずっと不運だった。親が仙人なんて名前を付けるから。学校では薄い仙人で「はげ仙人」なんてよばれるし、会社は倒産し、家は燃え、さっきトラックで引かれたところだ。そして、今「自称邪心」に次の魔王になってほしいと頼まれている。

―「なんで俺がそんなことしなきゃいけないのだ。」

「君には普通の人間よりも欲が何倍も大きい。ほんとは君の世界では収まらないぐらいだよ。」

―「異世界に行くのはいいとして、なんで魔王なんだ？」

「一つは、さっきも言った通り、君の欲は大きい。二つ目はもうすぐ現魔王がいなくなるからだよ。」

―「勇者にでも殺されたか？」

「いや、勇者と魔王が結婚した。」

―「は？」意味がわからない。勇者は魔王を倒すものではないのか？

「いなくなるというよりは魔王をやめるという表現のほうが正しかったかな。」

邪神によると勇者と魔王が結婚し、現魔王は魔王をやめるので、勇者と魔王の子供に転生し、次の新たな魔王になってほしいとのことだった。

人族と魔族（エルフ、ドワーフ、悪魔など）がこの世界にはあり、人族は聖神、魔族は

邪神が保護しているそうで、人と魔族は大昔から敵対しているそうだ。

聖神は魔族を忌み嫌っているので、魔族を統べる物がいなくなればいつ人族が襲ってくるかわからない。

人族には個別スキル（怪力、俊足など）には一般スキルと固有スキルがある。

固有スキルは世界に一人しかもっておらず、使用者が死ぬと新しく生まれてきた誰かがその固有スキルを手にする。固有スキルは5000万人に１人ぐらいの割合だそうだ。

一般スキルは固有スキルと違い、スキルがかぶることはよくあるそうだ。

魔族は種族スキルがある。種族スキルとはその種族が全員同じスキルをもっている。

魔族は固有スキルや個別スキルがない代わり人よりも各ステータスが高い。

俺は邪神に恩恵を3つもらった。一つは「超再生」。これは怪我や魔力、体力を瞬時に再生させてくれるチート能力だ。2つ目は「代償」腕や心臓などの代償をつくることによって自分を強化したり、新しく武器を作ることができる。この能力は一つ目の「超再生」と組み合わせることでバグをうみだすことができる。3つ目は「入れ替え」これは、さわったことのある物や人との場所を入れ替えることができる。

この三つの恩恵で異世界を俺は生き抜いてやる。

@ 7d33ba57:1b82db35

Rome isn’t just a city—it’s a living, breathing museum where ancient ruins, baroque fountains, and buzzing piazzas come together in beautiful, chaotic harmony. Every cobblestone has a story, every espresso has a punch, and every sunset behind the Colosseum feels like a scene from a movie. Whether it's your first visit or your fifth, Rome never gets old.

🏛️ Top Things to See & Do in Rome

1️⃣ The Colosseum & Roman Forum

• Step inside the iconic arena of gladiators
• Wander through the ruins of the Forum, once the heart of ancient Rome
• Don’t miss Palatine Hill for views over it all

2️⃣ Vatican City

• Home to St. Peter’s Basilica, the Sistine Chapel, and the Vatican Museums
• Climb to the top of the basilica dome for one of the best panoramas in Rome
• Book tickets ahead—it gets packed!

3️⃣ Trevi Fountain

• Toss in a coin to ensure your return to Rome 💧
• Visit early in the morning or late at night to beat the crowds and get that perfect photo

4️⃣ Pantheon

• One of the best-preserved Roman temples—free to enter, awe guaranteed
• Look up: the open oculus in the dome is engineering genius
• Step outside for a coffee in Piazza della Rotonda

5️⃣ Piazza Navona & Campo de’ Fiori

• Piazza Navona: Elegant fountains, artists, street performers
• Campo de’ Fiori: Bustling morning market and lively nightlife
• Great spots to grab an aperitivo or soak up atmosphere

🍕 What to Eat in Rome

• Cacio e Pepe – Pasta with pecorino and black pepper—simple, bold, and pure Rome
• Carbonara – No cream! Just egg, cheese, guanciale, and pepper
• Supplì – Deep-fried rice balls with melted mozzarella inside
• Roman-style pizza – Thin and crispy, often sold by weight
• Gelato – Try real artisan shops like Gelateria del Teatro or Otaleg

🌇 Bonus Rome Moments

• Watch sunset from Pincian Hill or Gianicolo Terrace
• Stroll across the Tiber River to the charming Trastevere neighborhood
• Visit the Jewish Ghetto for history, architecture, and amazing food (hello, fried artichokes!)
• Wander without a map—Rome loves surprising you

🛵 Tips for Visiting

✅ Wear comfy shoes—Rome’s cobbles are beautiful, but brutal on feet
✅ Book major attractions in advance to skip lines
✅ Tap water is fresh—refill from Rome’s historic fountains (nasoni)
✅ Don’t rush—Rome is best enjoyed slowly, with a gelato in hand

@ da0b9bc3:4e30a4a9

Hello Stackers!

Welcome on into the ~Music Corner of the Saloon!

A place where we Talk Music. Share Tracks. Zap Sats.

So stay a while and listen.

🚨Don't forget to check out the pinned items in the territory homepage! You can always find the latest weeklies there!🚨

🚨Subscribe to the territory to ensure you never miss a post! 🚨

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/940429

@ 2e8970de:63345c7a

This week I read up on what's currently happening to kids and their relationship to social media and smartphones. Especially the following thw pieces of media: The Ezra Klein Show: ‘Our Kids Are the Least Flourishing Generation We Know Of’ interview with Jonathan Haidt and his book on the topic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN2GhPal4qA

And the podcast Search Engine 'What’s actually on teenagers’ phones? ' and a documentary tv show on the topic where teenagers show their phone screens to their parents as a social experiment

https://www.searchengine.show/whats-actually-on-teenagers-phones/

Yes yes, both are outlets that are clearly progressive partisan. But this topic really is a non partisan topic. Don't click away yet.

Here are my key takeaways on the topic:

How kids spend their time

• For most of human history kids and teenagers spend their time with other kids. And especially not only their exact same age: also with kids a few years older and younger. This is obviously a lot less now that kids are almost exclusively online. When kids play outside and have other kids that are 2y older as rolemodels and look out for other kids that are 2y younger that obviously changes something in their upbringing and how they learn to behave in social connections. What changes about personality of humans when whole generations did not have this experience?
• Kids spend more and more time with their parents. This might be surprising in a story that is primarily about less and less socializing. But parents are more and more of the opinion that the most important goal in parenting is spending "quality time" with their kids. But is this true? Shouldn't they spend time with peers instead?
• The offline world is online now. In the tv show referenced in the podcast the filmcrew also got insight what teenagers do on gettogethers and partys. It was a surprising sight. Everyone is used to being filmed all the time. A boy jumped off a building, another kid took drugs and ended up in the hospital. But haven't teenagers always done stupid shit? The key difference is the boy did not jump off a building because he was a stupid teenager having fun. He did it to go viral online. What a bleak bleak new world.
• Younger than you expect. Did you know that 40% of 2yo own a tablet/ipad? I still remember the outrage of 10yo owning non-smart phones. The topic is still on but now it's babys. Also elementary school aged kids are almost surely all confronted with softcore porn and violence regularly. You can almost expect a child of this age have also seen hardcore porn and extreme violence. This really begs the question why we as a society still count if a Marvel movie has 1 or 2 f-words - what a ludicrous contrast.
• What happens on the phone is a secret. Kids have almost all the behavior to not talk about what happens on their phones. To some extent this is normal, to some extent this is also a big mystery how this developed. Your teenage daughter will not tell you when she looks bulimia, eating disorders, and superhuman women influencers all the time. Your 7yo will not tell you that they looked at disturbing violence gore content. Most mysteriously: even 3yo often already know this behaviour to hide their phone screens when playing phone games. How do they learn this? It is indeed a mystery.

Gender divide

Young girls and young boys have very different experiences here. Boys do still spend time with gaming and voicechats together. Young girls time online is very different. It is mostly alone. It is instagram pictures of unattainable lifestyle and looks.

The loss of common values

Jonathan Haidt had an interesting insight on the interplay of smartphones and the decline of religiosity here. The decline of religiosity in the west is obviously nothing new, it predates smartphones. But social media confronts kids with a whole world of different people and different values. So, a secularized world might not derive its values from religion anymore but a secularized world with local communities might still create consensus on values. But a secularized world where culture happens globally does not anymore. kids increasingly say they have no meaning or goals in life. In the interview Jonathan Haidt lists many statistics on this topic that you can look at from many angles but overall this is the trend.

An overaching concept in probably all value sets from liberal cities to arch conservative societies was some concept of social status. Maybe in an Amish village social status came from having a dozen children. Maybe in turbo leftist circles social status came from having an art exhibition.... you get the idea, the specifics do not matter. For teenagers this social status is synonymous with likes and followers. You, as a kid, will probably never have a million followers and therefore in this new world social status is unattainable.

This is of course very oversimplified. But you see how the world changed overnight when smartphones happened.

The concept of "Pacts"

If phones are so bad, just give it to them at an older age! Not so fast cowboy.

Kids with smartphones are less depressed, less anxious, more social, get more exercise, & experience less cyberbullying than kids w/out smartphones

https://x.com/ENBrown/status/1909257644499480973

The problem here is of course that kids without phones are social outcasts. This is even worse than the phones themselves.

The solution that has become really popular post covid is the concept of pacts. A few parents from one neighborhood and/or one school year come together and make a pact to not give their kids phones until a certain age.

Depressingly, Jonathan Haidt analysis found that these pacts don't work that well: It's only a trend in what is upper middle class anyway. Statistically many parents "break" under the pressure before the year has arrived. And lastly, they only seem to work when the size of the pact is like 10 kids or bigger.

Conclusion

I encourage you all the watch the interview and or listen to the podcast. The world changed a lot and we are barely talking about it.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/941383

@ 10fe3f70:3489c810

contract-drafting #agreement-drafting #learn-drafting #keep-learning

I am a lawyer and a teacher. I am interested in learning new things every day.

I am from India, and have studied in a reputed law school in Delhi. I have long experience of working as in-house counsels to some reputed organisations.

My present goal is to teach drafting of contracts. What I will teach is some basic skills required by students to draft contracts.

I did some freelance online teaching during Covid Pandemic, and found that students are very interested in learning the craft. But, I also understood that they may not have enough free time to learn due to busy schedule.

If you are interested, you can access my curated playlist on Youtube

Keep watching this space, if you wish to know more...

Lessons on Contract Drafting

1. Contract Drafting - An Introduction
2. ...

@ c1e9ab3a:9cb56b43

Reanalysis: Could the Great Pyramid Function as an Ammonia Generator Powered by a 25GW Breeder Reactor?

Introduction

The Great Pyramid of Giza has traditionally been considered a tomb or ceremonial structure. Yet an intriguing alternative hypothesis suggests it could have functioned as a large-scale ammonia generator, powered by a high-energy source, such as a nuclear breeder reactor. This analysis explores the theoretical practicality of powering such a system using a continuous 25-gigawatt (GW) breeder reactor.

The Pyramid as an Ammonia Generator

Producing ammonia (NH₃) from atmospheric nitrogen (N₂) and hydrogen (H₂) requires substantial energy. Modern ammonia production (via the Haber-Bosch process) typically demands high pressure (~150–250 atmospheres) and temperatures (~400–500°C). However, given enough available energy, it is theoretically feasible to synthesize ammonia at lower pressures if catalysts and temperatures are sufficiently high or if alternative electrochemical or plasma-based fixation methods are employed.

Theoretical System Components:

1. High Heat Source (25GW breeder reactor)
   A breeder reactor could consistently generate large amounts of heat. At a steady state of approximately 25GW, this heat source would easily sustain temperatures exceeding the 450°C threshold necessary for ammonia synthesis reactions, particularly if conducted electrochemically or catalytically.

2. Steam and Hydrogen Production
   The intense heat from a breeder reactor can efficiently evaporate water from subterranean channels (such as those historically suggested to exist beneath the pyramid) to form superheated steam. If coupled with high-voltage electrostatic fields (possibly in the millions of volts), steam electrolysis into hydrogen and oxygen becomes viable. This high-voltage environment could substantially enhance electrolysis efficiency.

3. Nitrogen Fixation (Ammonia Synthesis)
   With hydrogen readily produced, ammonia generation can proceed. Atmospheric nitrogen, abundant around the pyramid, can combine with the hydrogen generated through electrolysis. Under these conditions, the pyramid's capstone—potentially made from a catalytic metal like osmium, platinum, or gold—could facilitate nitrogen fixation at elevated temperatures.

Power Requirements and Energy Calculations

A thorough calculation of the continuous power requirements to maintain this system follows:

• Estimated Steady-state Power: ~25 GW of continuous thermal power.
• Total Energy Over 10,000 years: """ Energy = 25 GW × 10,000 years × 365.25 days/year × 24 hrs/day × 3600 s/hr ≈ 7.9 × 10²¹ Joules """

Feasibility of a 25GW Breeder Reactor within the Pyramid

A breeder reactor capable of sustaining 25GW thermal power is physically plausible—modern commercial reactors routinely generate 3–4GW thermal, so this is within an achievable engineering scale (though certainly large by current standards).

Fuel Requirements:

• Each kilogram of fissile fuel (e.g., U-233 from Thorium-232) releases ~80 terajoules (TJ) or 8×10¹³ joules.
• Considering reactor efficiency (~35%), one kilogram provides ~2.8×10¹³ joules usable energy: """ Fuel Required = 7.9 × 10²¹ J / 2.8 × 10¹³ J/kg ≈ 280,000 metric tons """
• With a breeding ratio of ~1.3: """ Initial Load = 280,000 tons / 1.3 ≈ 215,000 tons """

Reactor Physical Dimensions (Pebble Bed Design):

• King’s Chamber size: ~318 cubic meters.
• The reactor core would need to be extremely dense and highly efficient. Advanced engineering would be required to concentrate such power in this space, but it is within speculative feasibility.

Steam Generation and Scaling Management

Key methods to mitigate mineral scaling in the system: 1. Natural Limestone Filtration 2. Chemical Additives (e.g., chelating agents, phosphate compounds) 3. Superheating and Electrostatic Ionization 4. Electrostatic Control

Conclusion and Practical Considerations

Yes, the Great Pyramid could theoretically function as an ammonia generator if powered by a 25GW breeder reactor, using: - Thorium or Uranium-based fertile material, - Sustainable steam and scaling management, - High-voltage-enhanced electrolysis and catalytic ammonia synthesis.

While speculative, it is technologically coherent when analyzed through the lens of modern nuclear and chemical engineering.

See also: nostr:naddr1qqxnzde5xymrgvekxycrswfeqy2hwumn8ghj7am0deejucmpd3mxztnyv4mz7q3qc856kwjk524kef97hazw5e9jlkjq4333r6yxh2rtgefpd894ddpsxpqqqp65wun9c08

@ 378562cd:a6fc6773

What Happens When You Wean Your Digital Life Way Back?

We’re swimming in screens. Notifications, news, and endless feeds are all designed to keep us plugged in, distracted, and running on digital fumes. But what happens when you stop feeding the machine?

What happens when you step back, shut it off, and just… live?

You might be amazed.

Step One: Wean Way Down

Start simple. No grand declarations, but just a quiet rebellion.

Fewer apps. Fewer tabs. Less time online. Maybe you only use the computer in the mornings. Maybe you can turn your phone off in the evening. Maybe Sunday will become a screen-free Sabbath.

The goal? Clear. Clean. Quiet.

At first, it might feel weird. Like quitting sugar or coffee, you’ll feel the pull. But then? Something shifts.

What Starts to Happen… 1. Your Mind Clears Up You stop bouncing from thought to thought. You breathe. You remember what it feels like to think deeply, uninterrupted. Your brain stops buffering and starts building again.

1. Time Slows Down You realize how much time was slipping through your fingers. Without the digital drag, you suddenly have space. You get stuff done. You notice the birds. You fix the fence. You write a letter. You rest. I've personally done these things. It IS AMAZING!

2. You Hear God More Clearly When the digital static dies down, the whisper of God gets louder. Scripture comes alive again. Prayer feels less like a chore and more like a lifeline. You hear Him in the quiet—and sometimes, even in yourself.

3. People Come Back into Focus You stop skimming people like headlines. You sit down, look up, listen, and be present. You find yourself reaching out more, talking longer, and remembering what a real connection feels like.

4. You Feel Alive Again You get energy back, your hands get busy with real work, your body moves, and your sleep deepens. You feel stronger, clearer, and more grounded like your soul has room to breathe again.

It’s Not About Losing—It’s About Gaining Less screen time isn’t about guilt or rules. It’s about freedom. It’s about trading mindless digital noise for something deeper, like clarity, creativity, peace, and presence.

Will you miss some stuff? Sure. But what you’ll gain is real life. Good life.

Try it. Wean way down. Scale Back! Watch what happens.

@ b1b16be0:08f41c1d

Bitcoin need more devs to scale! So I decide to translate to spanish https://plebdevs.com plebdevs@plebdevs.com is a opensource website to learn #bitcoin #lightning free.I started in my free time but now I have to sacrifice work time to move forward. Any zap could be a new bitcoiner!

Why Spanish? Spanish is the third most spoken language on the internet, but much of this community has little access to technical content in English. Plebdevs can be the 🔥torch that illuminates new developers to scale Bitcoin from Latin America and the world.

Apprenticeship Incentive Plebs will gaining the possibility of #learn a higher-paying job as #dev.

Let's Make Bitcoin Scale Millions of Spanish speakers can learn how to develop about Bitcoin and Lightning.

Proof of Work Introduction presentation: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1IMC4GHYjccKhGu2mDrtY3bOGcjyFcwgXwFyKyNMq7iw/edit?usp=sharing

🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 30%

Thanks to bitcoinplebdev@bitcoinpleb.dev to create this #wonder

Any Zap will be helpful!

mav21@primal.net am@cubabitcoin.org lacrypta@hodl.ar BenJustman@primal.net shishi@nostrplebs.com sabine@primal.net onpoint@nostr.com theguyswann@iris.to Richard@primal.net eliza@primal.net

@ f3873798:24b3f2f3

Durante décadas, ouvimos que o Brasil era o "país do futuro". Uma terra rica, com imenso potencial humano e natural, destinada a se tornar uma grande potência e referência para o mundo. Essa ideia, repetida em discursos políticos e publicações internacionais, alimentou gerações com esperança. Mas o tempo passou — e esse futuro promissor parece nunca chegar.

Na prática, o que vemos é um ciclo de promessas não cumpridas, problemas sociais profundos e um povo muitas vezes desiludido. Apesar do potencial imenso, o Brasil enfrenta barreiras estruturais e culturais que dificultam seu pleno desenvolvimento. E é justamente sobre isso que precisamos refletir.

A raiz dos nossos desafios

Não há como ter jeito sem que haja um enfrentamento com seriedade aos problemas que estão na base da nossa sociedade. Um dos maiores entraves é a precariedade da educação, tanto no acesso quanto na qualidade. Em muitas regiões, o estudo ainda é visto como perda de tempo, algo que não contribui para o sustento imediato da família. Mesmo com incentivos governamentais, o desempenho das escolas é baixo. Em vez de formar cidadãos críticos e profissionais capacitados, muitas vezes vemos instituições focadas em ideologias ou agendas desconectadas da realidade do aluno.

Outro ponto sensível é a estrutura familiar. Em áreas onde faltam referências morais, espirituais e sociais, o ambiente familiar pode se tornar disfuncional, com casos extremos de abusos e ausência total de valores básicos. Nesses contextos, a ausência de instituições que promovem virtudes e limites — como a Igreja, por exemplo — faz diferença. Não se trata de impor uma religião, mas de reconhecer o papel histórico que a fé teve (e ainda tem) na construção de uma base ética e civilizatória.

A falta de valores basilares e estrutura para a promoção da relações em sociedade, faz do ambiente escolar um local sem propósito, onde são depositados crianças para serem expostas a um convívio forçado com estranhos sem nenhum preparo familiar, e sendo muitas vezes subentendido pelos profissionais educadores como dever da família, no entanto tal estrutura foi corrompida e devido o combate a religião pelos veículos midiáticos.

O papel da cultura e da moralidade

A cultura brasileira também tem sido afetada por uma inversão de valores. Virtudes como honestidade, humildade e dedicação são muitas vezes vistas com desdém, enquanto comportamentos imprudentes e hedonistas são exaltados. Essa distorção enfraquece a sociedade e prejudica qualquer tentativa de avanço coletivo.

A elite intelectual e política, por sua vez, parece muitas vezes mais preocupada com interesses próprios do que com o bem comum. Muitos aderem a ideias que, em vez de promover a soberania e a autonomia nacional, aprofundam nossa dependência e fragilidade como país.

Existe saída?

Sim, existe. Mas não será simples — e muito menos rápida. O Brasil precisa de uma mudança profunda de mentalidade. Isso inclui:

Resgatar o valor da família e da formação moral;

Investir de verdade em uma educação que liberte, que forme e que inspire;

Incentivar a produção científica e tecnológica local;

Valorizar o trabalho árduo, a persistência e o compromisso com a verdade.

Também é preciso reconhecer que o desenvolvimento de uma nação não é apenas econômico, mas também espiritual e cultural. Mesmo que você não seja religioso, é possível entender que a construção de uma sociedade mais justa exige princípios, virtudes e limites. Sem isso, qualquer progresso será frágil e passageiro.

O Brasil tem jeito? Sim. Mas depende de nós — da nossa capacidade de enxergar com coragem onde estamos falhando, e da nossa disposição para agir com sabedoria, verdade e esperança.

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

In another team up with Global Sports Central, we are going to do a bracket challenge for the NBA Playoffs.

They've gotten their hands on a special prize from Blockstream to award the winner and they're hoping that Stackers will take part in the contest.

We're still working out all the details, but there will likely be a small buy-in and the runner up in the contest will win those sats.

The NBA Play-In Tournament, that determines final seeding, starts on April 15th. Once the seeding is set, we'll open up the contest for people to submit their brackets from NBA Bracketology.

Start thinking about your brackets now and make your bracketology account, so you can walk away with one of the prizes.

Also, let us know your thoughts about how big the buy-in should be. We want to discourage people from spamming a bunch of brackets without discouraging those who want to take part in the contest.

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqpqrep4phdx0hs6v3fynl0glp52c6skaqmgra23hyzyz5pnd8gmcqqsw33tk6puje8ceq4uyymssmgesskqrll8elua7ldfdftr05lts30sx32z65

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/940274

@ 9226eda1:6a1bde0e

Hi from Comet Notes!

const impressed = true;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRnDYB28bL8

comet #notes

@ 9226eda1:6a1bde0e

Hi from Comet Notes!

const impressed = true;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRnDYB28bL8

comet #notes

@ 95cb33b5:f4580cd4

​Electrical overloads are a significant concern in residential and commercial settings, often leading to hazardous situations such as fires, equipment damage, and power outages. One effective strategy to mitigate these risks is the installation of additional electrical circuits. By distributing electrical loads more evenly, additional circuits enhance safety, improve system efficiency, and accommodate the growing demand for electrical power in modern infrastructures.​

Understanding Electrical Overloads

An electrical overload occurs when the current flowing through a circuit exceeds its designated capacity. This situation typically arises when multiple high-power devices operate simultaneously on a single circuit, drawing more amperage than the wiring can safely handle. Consequences of overloads include overheating of wires, degradation of insulation, and, in severe cases, ignition of fires. Common indicators of an overloaded circuit are:​

Flickering or dimming lights

Frequently tripped circuit breakers or blown fuses

Warm or discolored wall plates​

Buzzing sounds from outlets or switches​

Burning odors emanating from electrical fixtures​

Mild shocks or tingling sensations when touching appliances

The Prevalence and Impact of Electrical Fires

Electrical malfunctions are a leading cause of residential fires. According to the Electrical Safety Foundation International (ESFI), home electrical fires account for an estimated 51,000 fires each year, resulting in nearly 500 deaths, more than 1,400 injuries, and $1.3 billion in property damage. These statistics underscore the critical need for preventive measures to address electrical overloads and enhance the safety of electrical systems.​

The Role of Additional Circuits in Preventing Overloads

Incorporating additional circuits into an electrical system effectively distributes the electrical load, reducing the likelihood of overloads. This approach involves segmenting the electrical supply into multiple pathways, each dedicated to specific areas or high-power appliances. Benefits of this strategy include:​

Enhanced Safety: By preventing excessive current flow through any single circuit, the risk of overheating and potential fires is significantly reduced.​

Improved Performance: Appliances and devices operate more efficiently when supplied with adequate power, free from the voltage drops associated with overloaded circuits.​

Capacity for Expansion: Additional circuits provide the necessary infrastructure to support new appliances or technological upgrades without compromising the existing system's integrity.​

Implementing Additional Circuits: Practical Considerations

When planning to add circuits, several factors must be considered to ensure effectiveness and compliance with safety standards:​

Assessment of Current Load: A thorough evaluation of the existing electrical load helps identify circuits that are frequently overloaded and areas where additional circuits are needed.​

Professional Installation: Engaging a licensed electrician ensures that new circuits are installed correctly, adhering to local codes and regulations.​

Use of Appropriate Materials: Selecting wiring and components that match the intended load capacity is crucial for safety and durability.​

Regular Maintenance: Periodic inspections and maintenance of the electrical system help detect and address potential issues before they escalate.​

Complementary Measures to Prevent Overloads

In addition to installing extra circuits, other practices can further mitigate the risk of electrical overloads:​

Use of Surge Protectors: Surge protectors safeguard sensitive electronics from voltage spikes, which can occur during overload conditions.

Avoidance of Extension Cords for Permanent Use: Relying on extension cords as a permanent solution indicates insufficient outlets and can contribute to overloads. Installing additional outlets or circuits is a safer alternative.​

Upgrading Electrical Panels: Older electrical panels may not support the increased load demands of modern appliances. Upgrading to a panel with higher capacity can enhance system safety and performance.​

Conclusion The integration of additional electrical circuits is a proactive and effective measure to prevent electrical overloads. By ensuring a balanced distribution of electrical loads, this approach enhances the safety, efficiency, and adaptability of electrical systems. Given the significant number of fires attributed to electrical malfunctions annually, prioritizing such preventive strategies is imperative. Engaging qualified professionals to assess and implement necessary electrical upgrades, including the addition of circuits, is essential in safeguarding property and lives against the hazards of electrical overloads.

@ 5d4b6c8d:8a1c1ee3

So, we've been trying to housebreak this dog (that was supposedly already housebroken). We had gone out first thing in the morning, but she didn't poop. I figured the poop accident she had had right before bed might be the reason. Maybe she just had nothing left in the tank.

Well, no. While I was getting dressed, she was quickly dropping a deuce on the carpet. I cleaned that up and headed out for a while. Apparently, she pooped again while I was gone, despite being let out several times.

Then, upon my return, as my wife is telling me about the dog's accidents, the kid comes running inside shouting " I POOPED MY PANTS!" What's happening?

We get her into the bath, scrub her down, and get her all cleaned up. I take another attempt at finishing my dinner, only to hear some indecipherable shouting from upstairs. Of course it's more poop. The kid is sitting on the toilet screaming about getting poop on her hands while trying to wipe.

Finally, I took the dog out for a walk to hopefully avoid another poop incident...and the leash snapped.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/940243

@ 866e0139:6a9334e5

---

Autor: Jens Fischer Rodrian. Dieser Beitrag wurde mit dem Pareto-Client geschrieben. Sie finden alle Texte der Friedenstaube und weitere Texte zum Thema Frieden hier.**

---

In den letzten fünf Jahren wurde mit allen Mitteln versucht, die Menschen auseinanderzutreiben. Egal welches Thema gestreut oder welche Angst geschürt wurde, ob Corona, Ukraine, Gaza, Energiepolitik, Wirtschaft, Gendern oder Klima – immer sollten die Menschen einem vorgegebenen Narrativ folgen anstatt in einen offenen Debattenraum einzutreten und Differenzen auszuhalten, also das zu leben, was eine lebendige Demokratie ausmacht.

Natürlich stellt sich die Frage – ja aber wer hat das denn versucht? Wer hat denn ein Interesse daran, daß Diversität im Sinne von Vielfalt an Meinungen ausgehebelt wird? Dies zu beantworten würde den Rahmen hier sprengen, ist aber mit Verweis auf die Texte von Journalisten wie Milosz Matuschek, Tom-Oliver Regenauer u.v.a. schnell in Erfahrung zu bringen. Fest steht, nicht alle haben bei dem Versuch, die Bevölkerung ruhig und dumm zu halten, mitgemacht.

Der Wahnsinn als Chance

Egal wie laut die Bellizisten in Regierung und Medien ihre Kriegspropaganda in Dauerschleife rausbrüllen, in dem Wahnsinn steckt auch eine Chance. Immer mehr Leute verstehen, daß Deutschland in nahezu allen oben angeführten Themen, falsch abgebogen ist. Wenn es darum geht, seine Kinder für einen irrsinnigen, von den USA und der NATO provozierten Krieg in der Ukraine, zu opfern, werden hoffentlich mehr Menschen erkennen, daß sie verheizt werden sollen. Wichtig ist, daß wir nicht mit der Energie, die man für einen Sprint braucht, an all die Themen ran gehen, sondern uns auf einen Marathonlauf einstellen. Das wissen wir spätestens, seitdem die von Paul Schreyer heraus geklagten RKI Files nicht für die Empörung gesorgt haben, die man hätte erwarten können, obwohl sie klar aufzeigen, daß die Kritiker der Coronamaßnahmen in fast allen Punkten recht behalten sollten. Spätestens dann hätte die bis dahin sehr einseitig berichtende Konzernpresse auf das Thema aufspringen können, ja müssen, ist sie aber nicht. Milosz Matuschek hatte schon sehr früh in der NZZ gefragt: „Was, wenn am Ende ‚die Covidioten‘ Recht haben?“ 

Dass die Medien jetzt im Gleichschritt die Bevölkerung auf Krieg einstellen wollen (zahlreiche Links sind am Ende des Artikels zu finden), ist an Irrsinn nicht zu überbieten. Caren Miosga, die u.a. schon durch ihr unsägliches Interview mit Exkanzlerkandidat Robert Habeck durch mangelnde Objektivität und Einfältigkeit auffiel, sagte jüngst: „ (...) das lag lange nicht in unserer DNA, da lag Pazifismus. Wie können wir diesen Code schneller überschreiben?“ Die Antwort des Wehrdienstverweigerers und Kriegstreibers Joschka Fischer, sowie seine wirre Einschätzung einer korrupten ukrainischen Regierung und der von Neonazis durchzogenen Paramilitärs, findet Ihr in den Links am Ende des Artikels.

Seit 1945 war es nie so wichtig wie heute, daß wir uns dem entgegenstellen, alle anderen Unstimmigkeiten für den Moment beiseitelegen und gemeinsame Sache machen, denn es geht um alles, es geht um Krieg oder Frieden! Wir sollten keinen Zweifel daran haben, daß die Verantwortlichen, die Menschen mit einem experimentellen Gentherapeutikum „impfen“ auch keine Bedenken haben, die Kinder anderer Eltern in den Krieg zu treiben. Wären die Staatenlenker verpflichtet, ihre eigenen Kinder auch an die Front zu schicken, wäre das Säbelrasseln sofort vorbei – wobei ich mir bei Anton Hofreiter oder Annalena Baerbock gar nicht so sicher bin, sie sind Überzeugungstäter. Letztere fordert allen Ernstes, Russen bei Kriegsgedenken auszuschließen, sie seien per ‚Hausrecht“ zu behandeln. Der geschichtsvergessenen „Noch -Außenministerin“ ist anscheinend entfallen, daß die Russen 25 Millionen Opfer aus dem 2. Weltkrieg zu beklagen und Auschwitz befreit haben.

Das German Foreign Policy schreibt:

„Das Mindset für den Krieg – Bundeswehr-Kommandeure fordern Einstimmung der Bevölkerung auf Kriegssituationen, dringen auf stärkeren ‚Willen zur Selbstbehauptung‘. Bundesregierung arbeitet an ‚Bunker-App‘. CDU- Politiker spekuliert über ‚Spannungsfall‘“. 

Um ein Zeichen gegen diesen Irrsinn zu setzen und sowohl auf die drohende Eskalation in der Ukraine wie auch die seit Jahrzehnten andauernde ethnische Säuberung in Palästina hinzuweisen, veranstalten wir am Karfreitag eine Friedensprozession in Dresden. Die Teilnehmerliste und den Text, den man auch unterzeichnen kann, findet Ihr hier im Anhang.

Jeder, der sich für den Frieden stark macht, ist willkommen.

Einer der Teilnehmer ist Tino Eisbrenner, ein Sänger und Friedensaktivist, der sich seit Jahrzehnten für Dialog und ein friedliches Miteinander einsetzt. Er selbst ist immer wieder mit Angriffen von Leuten konfrontiert, die es nicht ertragen, daß er sich beharrlich mit Wort und Musik für den Dialog mit Russland einsetzt. Erst vor Kurzem mußte er sich die inquisitorischen Fragen einer Journalistin gefallen lassen, die eine Art Gesinnungsprüfung durchführte, da ihr zu Ohren gekommen sei, das Bürger besorgt wären, Eisbrenner könne ein Putinfreund sein. Eisbrenner merkte an, daß sicherlich kein Künstler, der in Amerika auftrete oder amerikanische Poeten verehre, dadurch in Verdacht geraten könne, die imperialistische Politik eines amerikanischen Präsidenten zu unterstützen. Hier der Teil seiner Antwort, der die Kraft der Kultur und deren Funktion, Brücken zu bauen, sehr schön zusammenfasst: 

„ (...) wenn man als Künstler der Ansicht ist, daß die Kunst, als wesentlichstes Merkmal des Menschseins, Grenzen überfliegen und die Brücken zwischen den Völkern erhalten und pflegen sollte, und dies auf Russland genau wie auf die USA anwendet, muss man sich rechtfertigen? In der Stadt Wolgograd (ehemals Stalingrad) gibt es ein riesiges Mahnmal für die Opfer des Zweiten Weltkrieges. Das Hauptgebäude, unweit der riesigen Grabstätte deutscher Soldaten, ist eine gigantische Kuppel in deren Mitte ein ewiges Feuer brennt. An den Wänden sind zigtausende Namen sowjetischer Bürger eingraviert, die der deutschen Schlacht um Stalingrad zum Opfer fielen. Und aus den Lautsprechern tönen in Dauerschleife die „Träumereien“ von Robert Schumann, einem deutschen Komponisten. Die Kunst, als Brücke zwischen den Völkern. Vielleicht können ihre „besorgten Bürger“ darüber mal in Ruhe nachdenken (...)“ 

Ich hatte die große Freude, mit Tino gemeinsam einen Song aufzunehmen, den wir beide bei der Friedensprozession in Dresden das erste mal live aufführen werden. 

Frieden mit dem Frieden schließen

Frieden fragt nicht wo warst Du gestern\ Frieden fragt nicht wer ist Dein Gott\ Frieden braucht jetzt jeden, mit Herz Verstand und Mut 

Frieden geht oft über Grenzen\ Frieden geht, wenn man ihn übersieht\ Frieden braucht jetzt jeden, mit Herz Verstand und Mut 

Frieden schweigt wenn Menschen brüllen\ Frieden erstarrt wenn Schüsse fallen\ Frieden braucht jetzt jeden, mit Herz Verstand und Mut 

Frieden fragt nicht nach Deinen Eltern\ Frieden stellt sich vor Deine Wut\ Frieden braucht jetzt jeden, mit Herz Verstand und Mut 

Wir müßen Frieden mit dem Frieden schließen

Mit Leib und Seele, Tag für Tag\ Frieden braucht Dich jetzt\ Er ist erschöpft und schwer verletzt                     ****

Kommt zur Friedensprozession!

Unser Orga-Team hat gemeinsam mit Jürgen Fliege den Text für die Friedensprozession am Karfreitag in Dresden verfasst, den man gern auch unterzeichnen kann.

https://friedensprozession.de

FUNDAMENT FÜR DEN FRIEDEN   Mit Dir! Mit uns! Mit allen!

Jenseits jeder politischen Orientierung wollen wir dieser Sehnsucht eine Stimme geben. Denn ein Krieg, ob er nun wie ein Flächenbrand in der Ukraine oder wie in Palästina wütet, verschont immer die Mächtigen. Nie die Ohnmächtigen. Das sehen viele Menschen in unserem Land längst. Wie schon in Jugoslawien und Afghanistan scheint das die Volksvertreter nicht zu interessieren.

Wir alle wollen keinen Krieg. Wir wollen Abrüstung, Frieden und gute Nachbarn sein.

Was sind das nur für Politiker, die im Gleichschritt gegen das Wohl der Völker marschieren? Die Strack-Zimmermanns, Pistorius‘, die Baerbocks, Merz und Kiesewetters, die den Krieg weit nach Russland hineintragen und amerikanische Raketen in Deutschland stationieren wollen, ähnlich wie ihn der Kriegsverbrecher Netanjahu nach Gaza trug. Wer stoppt die Eskalationsspirale des Wahnsinns? Können wir das noch? Wir müssen es versuchen!

Friede sei mit uns allen! Ohne Ausnahme! Darum müssen wir uns vereinen. Versöhnen statt Spalten war einmal eine gute Idee der alten Sozialdemokratie – genau das wollen wir wieder aufgreifen!

Das alles war einmal der Boden, auf dem unser Grundgesetz wuchs. Die Trümmer des Krieges und die Gräber von Millionen Toten verpflichten uns zum Frieden durch Diplomatie.

Wenn Ihr unsere Sehnsucht nach Frieden teilt, dann freuen wir uns sehr, euch in Dresden zu sehen, wo der Feuersturm des 2. Weltkrieges unvergessen bleibt. Am Karfreitag, an dem die Stille das Waffenrasseln um so hörbarer macht.

Nie wieder Antisemitismus! Nie wieder Faschismus! Nie wieder Krieg! Kommt nach Dresden! Bitte!

Das aktuelle Album „Voices for Gaza“ mit 32 Beiträgen findet Ihr hier:

https://protestnoten.de/produkt/voices-for-gaza-doppel-cd/

Mit dabei sind:

Uwe Steimle, Tino Eisbrenner, Jürgen Fliege, Prof. Ulrike Guérot, Yann Song King, Arnulf Rating, Markus Stockhausen, Kilian Forster, Diether Dehm, Jakob Heymann, Jens Fischer Rodrian, Alexa Rodrian, Guido de Gyrich, Dennis DuVall, Prof. Justus Frantz, Reiner Kröhnert

(Links:

• https://taz.de/Sportunterricht-fuer-den-Ernstfall/!6059664/
• https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/wir-mussen-uns-auf-krieg-vorbereiten-nato-chef-rutte-fordert-von-deutschland-deutlich-hohere-verteidigungsausgaben-13131001.html
• https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/bundeswehr-bereitet-unternehmen-auf-kriegsfall-vor-operationsplan-deutschland-110118573.html
• https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/sicherheit-in-deutschland-innenministerium-fuer-zivilschutz-uebungen-an-schulen-a-1680d64e-4a42-4e00-954b-0cb38e315a90
• https://www.facebook.com/henning.rosenbusch/videos/die-pflicht-zur-musterung-brauche-es-wegen-der-gefallenen-und-verwundeten-um-die/1073875391166801/
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juGk0aY5Rdo Fischer bei Miosga
• https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/die-wehrpflicht-sollte-fur-alle-gelten-frauen-ans-gewehr-13480606.html

---

Jens Fischer Rodrian, geboren 1967 in Pinneberg, ist ein deutscher Musiker, Komponist, Musikproduzent und Dichter. Aufgewachsen nahe Murnau am Staffelsee, entdeckte er früh seine Liebe zur Gitarre. Er studierte in Los Angeles an der Grove School of Music und wurde 1995 Mitglied der Blue Man Group in New York und Boston. Seit 2004 lebt er mit seiner Frau, der Jazzsängerin Alexa Rodrian in Berlin, wo er als musikalischer Leiter der Blue Man Group tätig ist. Neben seiner Arbeit mit Künstlern wie Konstantin Wecker veröffentlichte er mehrere Soloalben und Gedichtbände, darunter „Sich kurz fassen – ach“ (2017) und „Wahn & Sinn“ (2019). Mit seiner Konzertlesung tourt er durch den deutschsprachigen Raum und setzt sich leidenschaftlich für Frieden und Demokratie ein. Zuletzt erschien: „Die Armada der Irren. Künstlerischer Widerstand in pandemischer Zeit“ (2022): Ein Buch mit beiliegender CD, das sich mit gesellschaftlichem Widerstand und der Rolle der Kunst in Krisenzeiten auseinandersetzt. Es enthält Beiträge von verschiedenen Autoren wie Wolfgang Wodarg, Gunnar Kaiser und anderen.

---

Die Friedenstaube fliegt auch in Ihr Postfach!

Hier können Sie die Friedenstaube abonnieren und bekommen die Artikel zugesandt. (Vorerst an alle, da wir den Mailversand testen, später ca. drei Mails pro Woche.).

Schon jetzt können Sie uns unterstützen:

• Für 50 CHF/EURO bekommen Sie ein Jahresabo der Friedenstaube.
• Für 120 CHF/EURO bekommen Sie ein Jahresabo und ein T-Shirt/Hoodie mit der Friedenstaube.
• Für 500 CHF/EURO werden Sie Förderer und bekommen ein lebenslanges Abo sowie ein T-Shirt/Hoodie mit der Friedenstaube.
• Ab 1000 CHF werden Sie Genossenschafter der Friedenstaube mit Stimmrecht (und bekommen lebenslanges Abo, T-Shirt/Hoodie).

Für Einzahlungen in CHF (Betreff: Friedenstaube):

Für Einzahlungen in Euro:

Milosz Matuschek

IBAN DE 53710520500000814137

BYLADEM1TST

Sparkasse Traunstein-Trostberg

Betreff: Friedenstaube

Wenn Sie auf anderem Wege beitragen wollen, schreiben Sie die Friedenstaube an: milosz@pareto.space

---

Sie sind noch nicht auf Nostr and wollen die volle Erfahrung machen (liken, kommentieren etc.)? Zappen können Sie den Autor auch ohne Nostr-Profil! Erstellen Sie sich einen Account auf Start. Weitere Onboarding-Leitfäden gibt es im Pareto-Wiki.

@ 95cb33b5:f4580cd4

Your wedding day in London is a story waiting to unfold—a stroll through Hyde Park, vows at the historic St. Paul’s Cathedral, and dancing under the stars at a Thames-side venue. But before the "I dos" and the first dance, there’s one detail that sets the scene: your wedding car. In a city where history meets modernity, your choice of wheels isn’t just transportation—it’s the opening act of your love story. Here’s how to find the perfect wedding car in London, whether you’re dreaming of vintage charm or sleek, 21st-century luxury.

1. London’s Wedding Car Options: From Vintage Classics to Modern Marvels

London’s diverse vibe means you’re spoiled for choice. Here’s a breakdown of popular picks:

A. Vintage & Classic Cars

Best For: Traditional weddings, history lovers, or couples marrying at landmarks like Kensington Palace.

Top Picks:

Rolls-Royce Phantom (1960s): Timeless elegance with coach doors and a starlight headliner. Bentley S1 (1950s): Polished wood dashboards and leather seats for old-world glam. Austin Princess (Vintage): A British icon perfect for retro-themed weddings.

Cost: £500–£1,500+ for 6–8 hours.

Real-Life Romance: Sarah and James hired a 1950s Bentley for their Westminster Abbey wedding. “It felt like stepping into a royal procession,” Sarah said.

B. Modern Luxury Cars

Best For: Glamorous city weddings or receptions at venues like The Shard.

Top Picks:

Mercedes-Maybach S-Class: Heated massaging seats and ambient lighting.

Tesla Model X: Eco-friendly and futuristic, ideal for green-minded couples.

Range Rover Autobiography: Bold and spacious for urban chic.

Cost: £600–£2,000+ for full-day hire.

Pro Tip: Opt for a car with tinted windows if you’re navigating busy spots like Piccadilly Circus—privacy plus style!

C. Quirky & Unique Rides

Best For: Couples who dare to be different.

Top Picks:

London Black Cab (Decorated): Adorned with flowers for a playful, local twist.

Vintage Double-Decker Bus: Fit your entire bridal party (and a brass band!).

Electric Rickshaw: Zip through Covent Garden for a fun, eco-friendly entrance.

Cost: £200–£800 for shorter hires.

3.2. How to Choose Your London Wedding Car: 5 Key Factors

Don’t get overwhelmed—narrow your options with these tips:

Match Your Wedding Theme:

A vintage Rolls-Royce suits a classic church wedding.

A Tesla Model S pairs with a modern art gallery reception.

Consider Practicality:

Space: Ball gown? Choose a Bentley Mulsanne. Compact? Try a Jaguar E-Type.

Route: Narrow streets in Notting Hill? Avoid stretch limos.

Weatherproofing:

Convertibles are risky in London’s drizzle. Prefer a hardtop or ensure the hire includes a waterproof cover.

Sustainability:

Many companies now offer hybrid or electric cars (e.g., Tesla, BMW i7).

Budget:

Prioritize: Splurge on the ceremony car, then use a simpler ride for the exit.

Pro Tip: “We hired a vintage car for photos and a Tesla for the reception—best of both worlds!” —Laura, Hackney bride.

1. Cost of Wedding Car Hire in London: What to Expect

London prices vary wildly, but here’s a rough guide:

Vintage Cars: £500–£1,500+ (includes chauffeur).

Modern Luxury: £600–£2,000+ (Maybachs at the higher end).

Unique Rides: £200–£1,000 (buses or themed vehicles).

Money-Saving Hacks:

Off-Peak Discounts: Book a weekday wedding for 10–20% off.

Bundle Deals: Some companies offer cars + photo booth or floral decor.

Short-Term Hire: Use the car for 3–4 hours (ceremony + photos only).

Watch For Hidden Fees:

Congestion Charge (£15/day for Central London).

Overtime charges (£50–£150/hour).

1. Booking Your London Wedding Car: Step-by-Step

Start Early: Book 6–12 months ahead for peak season (June–September).

Read Reviews: Check Google and Hitched.co.uk for reputable companies.

Visit the Garage: Inspect the car in person—avoid surprises!

Confirm Details:

Backup vehicle clause.

Insurance coverage.

Decor permissions (e.g., floral hoops).

Red Flags:

No physical address or vague contracts.

Pressure to pay 100% upfront.

London Pro Tip: Use local companies like London Vintage Car Hire or Prestige Wedding Cars for better rates.

1. Unique London Wedding Car Ideas

Make your ride unforgettable with these twists:

Thames-Side Photos: Park your Rolls-Royce near Tower Bridge for iconic shots.

Themed Decor: Add London Underground-inspired signage or Union Jack ribbons.

Surprise Stops: Arrange a quick champagne toast at Primrose Hill for skyline views.

Real-Life Magic: A couple from Camden hired a red London bus to shuttle guests from St. Pancras to their reception. “It was a party on wheels!” they shared.

Key Takeaways

🚗 Diverse Options: London offers everything from vintage Rolls-Royces to eco-friendly Teslas.

💷 Budget Smart: Prioritize, bundle, or book off-peak.

📅 Book Early: Secure your dream car 6–12 months ahead.

🌧️ Plan for Rain: Choose weather-appropriate vehicles.

📸 Photo Ready: Use London landmarks like the Thames or Kensington Gardens as backdrops.

FAQs About Wedding Car Hire in London

Q: How much does a wedding car cost in London?

A: From £200 for a decorated taxi to £2,000+ for a Rolls-Royce Phantom.

Q: Can we drive ourselves?

A: Rarely. Most luxury hires require a licensed chauffeur (and let you relax!).

Q: Are permits needed for photo locations?

A: Yes! Check with your photographer. Westminster Bridge requires permits for professional shoots.

Q: What if our car breaks down?

A: Reputable companies offer backup vehicles. Always ask!

Q: Can we personalize the car?

A: Yes—ribbons, flowers, or temporary decals. Avoid anything adhesive.

Final Thought: Your London Love Story Starts Here

At your wedding the transportation becomes more than just a method of getting from point A to point B but it creates the start of your lifetime story. The wedding car you select will leave an indelible mark in your memories as well as picture album forever because it can be a vintage Bentley near Big Ben or a flower-adorned bus with your friends onboard.

The streets of London will become the perfect backdrop when you choose your cars that trigger your heart's enthusiasm for your future eternal bond. Each romantic tale in this mesmerizing city ought to receive its definitive entrance.

@ 000002de:c05780a7

From time to time I will listen to a podcast called "The Dangerous History Podcast" and in the most recent episode he plays some "music" from the WW1 propaganda machine. Its wild how on the nose it is. I think people forget how in your face propaganda was in the past. Its more subtle today and people sometimes act as if news, media and entertainment were once reliable sources of information. When I hear people complaining about bias or propaganda in media today I usually push back and say, its better than it was in the past. At least now we have more choice as well as tools to check things for ourselves.

Don't forget, the state has always been about manipulating you. Sure, it changes its tactics but there really isn't some golden era where this wasn't happening. They have just become more sophisticated as the people get more keen on the old tactics.

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/940221

@ 8d5ba92c:c6c3ecd5

It’s often said that 'Bitcoin doesn’t need marketing'—and the internet proves it well, almost like a daily feed. Instead of typical ads in the form of 'sell-me-anything-and-everything', the space thrives on organic memes and threads: a grassroots testament to Bitcoin ethos.

This isn’t about the artificial promotion of THE TRUMAN SHOW, where desires are manufactured and ads dictate specific behaviours. Bitcoiners don’t just reject the Proof-of-Hype, so typical in a fiat-driven world, they replace it with Proof-of-Work: value emerging not from coercion, but from consensus (i.e., what the community validates as genuine and meaningful).

The "Funny Money" Crew

On the other hand, equally common is the twist with memes labeled 'Bitcoin’s Marketing Team', featuring faces like:

🤡 Jerome Powell (Fed Chair), Christine Lagarde (ECB), Agustín Carstens (BIS chief, CBDC pusher), Janet Yellen (U.S. Treasury Secretary), Jamie Dimon (JPMorgan CEO), Elizabeth Warren (U.S. Senator), and so on.

Sophisticated jokes—appreciated by those who understand their actual impact. After all, what better advertisement for Bitcoin could there be than watching the fiat system degrade in real time? 😎

Why Bring This Up?

First, because I want to remind that Bitcoiners weaponize even simple ideas better than entire Wall Street-hired PR firms. Every "Bitcoin doesn’t need marketing" or "Thanks, Fed for the free promo!" is a clever, almost subversive way of raising topics we should be aware of. Exposing fiat’s failures often speaks louder than directly evangelizing how sound Bitcoin is—and how well it solves problems that keep many non-coiners awake at night.

Second, to credit where it’s due: Bitcoin-only projects and individuals who are actively spreading the word—hard money, real solutions, and the culture itself. But this isn’t 'marketing' in the traditional, pushy, profit-at-all-costs sense. Instead, it’s built on:

• Information (no bullshit, just facts)
• Education (orange-pilling, not upselling)
• Community (value, instead of dry PR)
• Creativity (proof-of-mind, not algo-baits)
• Experiences (how-to solutions, not showing off)

And let’s be clear: Earning money isn’t evil—it’s necessary for these projects to survive. What matters is the intention. No one should apologize for creating Bitcoin-themed ads, so long as they’re carrying the meaning, instead of being rooted in hype.

PoW: Earning Attention, Not Buying It

The list below (part one) is based on my own preferences, but it was also inspired by Bitcoin FilmFest, which—in its upcoming edition #BFF25, May 22-25—introduced a new block to the program: ‘BFF PoWies: The Show for Bitcoin-Only Advertising.’ A dedicated space for creative expression beyond films, where projects and individuals compete for awards in categories like Grand Prix, Best Visual, and Best Identity—with a $4,500 prize pool to grab.

Anyways, as our small but passionate team dug into this topic, I was really happy to uncover unique video ads, some of which I’m excited to share with you now.

If you know others, tag me (private profile) or 'Bitcoin FilmFest' directly on socials. Feel free to submit your work to the PoWies too (submissions close May 6th).

Without further ado... Let's explore the space where value is discovered, not packaged in empty promises 📺👇

Bitcoin-Video Ads: Part One.

Creative, funny, dynamic, inspirational. All four below. Enjoy!

1/. NEVER LOSE YOUR BITCOIN (Liana)

https://v.nostr.build/P7To0HpNmmB6iudR.mp4

2/. MAKE A CHANGE, (Wasabi)

https://v.nostr.build/rUGQAysAIDH8Wx9x.mp4

3/. THE MOTHER OF ALL BACKUPS (Cryptosteel)

https://v.nostr.build/3zesnSjQudQoxl5f.mp4

1. FINANCIAL FALLOUT (21 Futures)

https://v.nostr.build/sFvmt8oCWfxLKJRb.mp4

---

PS. The most effective Bitcoin ads aren't 'typical' campaigns—they're the result of creativity, PoW, and authentic storytelling move hand-in-hand.

BTC Your Mind. Let it Beat... Şela

@ 5677fa5b:15a5d3e1

https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/articles/250327-cryptocurrency-is-growing-within-u-s-state-reserves-and-statewide-pension-plans-13455336

I've watched pension plans repeatedly fumble the ball over the past 30 years. In the 80s and 90s they were run, not by CFOs, but out of Human Resources by nonfinancial officers who repeatedly enriched the benefits during an era of double-digit interest rates which had the liabilities so low that companies weren't allowed to contribute to them. Once CFO's figured out what they inherited, they continued to ignore the fix because their worldview was the risk-ignorant FAS87 accounting standard that incentivized risk maximization by allowing immediate recognition of expected returns while smoothing upon smoothing the volatility in the future. Even the smarter ones who adopted Liability Driven Investing ( LDI) eventually discovered their ruin by borrowing against their unrealized gains only to cause a liquidity crisis in 2022 when the UK gilts spiked out of control, necessitating a $60B bailout from the Bank of England.

It is a nonstop series of loss and dysfunction. Now "cryptocurrency" is entering the scene as if to offer the industry one last chance they don't deserve to snatch victory from the claws of defeat. If, by cryptocurrency, one means Bitcoin, then we might have a fighting chance still in this game. If one means any of the other altcoins, then they might as well pack their bags and surrender before they commit a worse offense than Canada's OTTP plan, who directed $100 million of its pension invested in FTX, while the CDPQ had $150 million in Celsius, both now bankrupt with their CEOs in prison

My upcoming book, "Bitcoin for Institutions" explains why Bitcoin is a godsend for pensions and other potential institutional use cases. It also explains why Blackrock understands Bitcoin much more than people want to give them credit for. I argue that Blackrock is looking to redefine Modern Portfolio Theory by abandoning bonds and inserting Bitcoin as the "risk-free asset" and that this is an existential solution stemming from being the primary investment manager impacted by the aforementioned Bank of England bailout. It appears now that S&P Global also understands Bitcoin. To what end is unclear to me, but I have to give credit where it is due. From their recent report titled "Cryptocurrency Is Growing Within U.S. State Reserves And Statewide Pension Plans", by credit analysts Todd Kanaster and Geoffrey Buswick, several items caught my eye and impressed me. Among them were from the summary of opportunities and risks (from the report):

Opportunities

• Bitcoin holdings may provide a hedge against long-term debasement of fiat currency through inflation, due to bitcoin's finite supply. Its value may also be driven by geopolitical factors if its security and decentralized nature lead to its increasing adoption as a reserve asset.

• Other crypto assets such as ether or Solana are similar to technology venture investments, as they provide exposure to upside if these technology platforms continue to see increasing adoption.

The first bullet demonstrates a clear acknowledgement that S&P understands and approves the messaging of what Bitcoin's biggest strength is. It is an astonishing acknowledgement of how debasement is a feature of fiat currency and how Bitcoin is the solution. They go as far as to explain how the decentralized nature and security carry out the solution.

The second bullet is icing on the cake, separating other crypto assets and classifying them, not as a monetary cornerstone, but as just some other potential source of return.

Risks

• Market value risk: Historically, their prices have been volatile. They would introduce a risk factor if included in funds that are intended to cover an issuer's short-term liquidity needs (which typically do not include asset types with significant market value risk).

• Operational and cyber: Although direct ownership of crypto requires specialized infrastructure and staffing, much of the risk is adjusted to levels comparable with those of traditional investments when held, in lieu of direct crypto ownership, in shares of a crypto ETF from a third party investment manager with robust operational practices.

• Goal misalignment: Grouping all non-stablecoin crypto together under the same risk profile may overlook unique risk characteristics among different types of investments, such as bitcoin ownership, technology investments, or tokenized securities.

• Regulatory uncertainty: We have seen a large swing in the regulation picture at the federal level from the new U.S administration and similar changes could happen again, either due to leadership change or even a downturn in crypto prices if that reduces investor interest.

S&P is showing a superior understanding of the risks of Bitcoin. They echo several of the risks I discuss in the book. They caution against using Bitcoin with a short-term time horizon (1st bullet), as well as admonish the idea of grouping altcoins with Bitcoin (3rd bullet). Additionally, the 2nd bullet warms my heart discussing the additional operational risk involved when trusting custody to a 3rd party, as Blackrock (and all of the Bitcoin ETF providers except for Fidelity) does. We've already seen that Coinbase uses pre-Segwit legacy addresses for the ETFs and that Blackrock is beginning to explore other options for its custodian.

It is important that pensions get this right, as it is unlikely that the Gods will be sending another lifeline. Getting this wrong will lead to a bailout that will make the Bank of England's look tame in comparison. Instead of letting the central bankers pick the winners and losers, companies and states are going to get one last chance to win on their own terms. A medium-term time horizon, and a strong understanding of what Bitcoin is and what gives it its value, is the blueprint for a road map to recovery and a series of successful, solvent plan terminations in the next 5-10 years.

@ 554ab6fe:c6cbc27e

What is consciousness, and can it be changed or enhanced? This is a question that humans have struggled with for a very long time. The question of consciousness alone is daunting. Some even argue that humans will never be able to find the answer. Regardless, the quest for knowledge is not always about the answer, rather it is the journey that is revealing. This is true not only for our society, but the individual as well. The search for the truth often leads one down a path of self-reflection, and can lead to conclusions previously thought to be ludicrous. Here, I will argue that consciousness can be interpreted as an interpretation of reality, where the interpretation may become clearer and more accurate through practices such as meditation.

Consciousness

To articulate this idea, the concept of consciousness must firstly be discussed. There is an incredibly interesting TED talk given by Anil Seth, where he describes consciousness as an illusion. He explains how the brain receives signals from both the internal and external environment of the body, makes an interpretation of those signals, which creates our conscious experience. In his scientific writing, he claims that the brain can be viewed as a prediction machine1. He argues that the brain is constantly making predictions and error correcting in order to gain understanding of the signals it is receiving. He is not alone in this theory, and many other researchers concur that the constant comparison of internal predictions and external stimuli is what generates the brain’s sensations of causal forces2. There are plenty of reasons to believe this is true. Imagine, the brain is receiving all kinds of neuronal signals both from external stimuli sensors and sensors for our internal systems. These signals all shoot up the spinal cord to the brain. It is unclear that these neuronal signals are stamped with an identifier of where they came from, so the brain has to make a predictive model for not only where the signal came from, but also why the signal came at all. The latter is important for survival: the use of our senses to accurately predict our environment would be a critical reason why consciousness developed in the first place. Imagine you are an ancient hominid walking in the wild: you see a tangled cord like thing around a branch on the tree. You need to process that information, determine if it is more branch or a snake and act accordingly. This is a potential biological reason for the manifestation of thought and problem solving. This is a very meta-cognitive example of our brain receiving information and then using previous knowledge to generate a predictive conclusion on the external reality.

There are also examples of this outside of the more obvious meta-cognitive examples. A good example is the famous rubber hand experiment. The first rubber hand experiment was conducted in 1998 by Botvinick and Cohen3. In this experiment, a subject places their hand on a table with a screen blocking their view of their own hand. A rubber hand is then placed on the other side of the screen where it is visible. The experimenter rubs both the rubber hand and real hand with a paint brush. By the end of the experiment, subjects begin to feel as if the rubber hand is their own limb3. The brain, using the visual senses, detects that a hand is being stroked with a brush while sensory neurons send signals that the hand is experiencing the touch of a paint brush. These two signals cause the predicting brain to think that the rubber hand is our hand. This experiment has been repeated many times in different ways. It has been observed that participants begin to react defensively to the threat of pain or damage to the rubber hand4. This illustrates the powerful extent at which the brain processes and reacts to information that it interprets from reality. Amazingly, some research suggests that the touch aspect of the experiment isn’t even necessary to produce the illusion5. Others have recreated this experience using virtual reality, citing that when the virtual hand changed color in response to the subject’s heartbeat, a significant sense of body ownership was generated6. Body ownership, and our sense of reality is arguably determined by our brain’s interpretation of both internal and external stimuli.

The Neuroscience and Meditation

It is hypothesized that the anterior insular cortex (AIC) is involved in the comparison of the stimuli to the predicted model1. Interestingly, the same brain region is associated with the anticipation of pain7. For those unaware, there is some research to suggest that much of the pain we experience is not due to the actual noxious stimuli (physical pain sensation), but from the anticipation of that pain. Evidence for this can be found in studies such as Al-Obaidi et al. from 2005, that concluded that the pain experienced in patients with chronic low back pain could not be solely attributed to the sensor signals, but from the anticipation of the pain8. Additionally, the anticipation of pain relief is the primary contributor to placebo analgesia (placebo pain killers)9. Furthermore, a large body of research has been conducted showing that meditators show a decreased anticipatory attitude towards pain, subsequently experiencing less unpleasant pain 7,10,11. For example, chronic pain in multiple areas such as the low back, neck, shoulder, and arms have been shown to reduce after meditation practice12. Finally, an extreme case study worth noting is of a yogi master who claimed to not experience pain at all13. When this master was brought into the lab, not only did he not experience pain, but his thalamus showed no additional activation following painful stimuli13. What is fascinating about this is that the thalamus is the main relay station for all incoming somatosensory information14, and some argue that this is a candidate for the location of consciousness15. To not have strong activation here after painful stimuli is to suggest a radical change in how the brain receives incoming stimuli, and perhaps is indicative in a dramatic shift in how this individual’s conscious experiences the world. Though this is but one small example, the previous studies outline a strong case for meditation’s ability to alter the way the brain processes information. Given meditation involves the active practice of generating an open and non-judgmental attitude towards all incoming stimuli, perhaps this alters the processing of incoming stimuli, thereby changing the predictive model. On a similar note, perhaps it relates to neuroplastic changes that occur within the brain. It has been noted that the AIC is activated during times of awareness of mind wandering16. This suggests that the AIC is in use frequently during meditation practices. Perhaps it is strengthened then by meditation, thereby also allowing for greater prediction model generation. Imagine the mind as a pond. If the pond is calm and still, one single rain drop rippling in the pond is clearly identifiable. One would easily know information about the droplet, because the ripple could be easily analyzed. Now imagine a pond during a rain storm, where an uncountable amount of rain drops is hitting the pond and there are ripples everywhere. One could not adequately make out where each ripple came from, because there would be too much overlap in the ripples. This may be how the brain functions as well. When the signals are low, and no extraneous thoughts and interpretations are created from signals, then the brain’s prediction model can easily determine where and why a signal it received came from. If, however, the mind is chaotic and full of internal noise, then the brain has a harder time creating an accurate understanding of incoming stimuli and generating a correct model.

Enlightenment

Enlightenment, from a scientific point of view, has been defined as a form of awareness where a person feels that s/he has gained a new understanding of reality 17. In this sense, it bears a striking relationship to the topic of consciousness. If consciousness can be defined as our interpretation of the external and internal environment through our mental prediction model, then experiences of enlightenment are defined by moments where our interpretation is completely changed in a profound way. The experiences are often characterized by the loss of individuality and consequent identification of being part of a greater oneness 18,19. As an interesting side note, this same experience is common amongst subjects, who in a double-blinded study, take psilocybin (the active ingredient in magic mushrooms)20,21. The neuroscience of enlightenment is particularly interesting. The temporo-parietal junction of the brain is involved with self-location and body ownership22. Unsurprisingly, this area is highly involved in the illusion of the rubber hand experiment23. This is the same brain area that is hypothesized to be related to these enlightened experiences of oneness 17. If this brain area, which handles the interpretation of where and what the body is, was to decrease in activation, then the brain would generate a more ambiguous interpretation that the self and the external environment are less distinct than previously thought. This is a possible explanation to why enlightenment experiences involve a feeling of oneness with everything. To bring this all home, meditation has been shown to decrease parietal lobe activation 4,24. Suggesting that meditation can be a method of adjusting the brain’s interpretation of stimuli to generate an outlook that is unifying in perceptive.

Closing Remarks

The evidence that meditation may lead to an altered conscious living has deep philosophical implications. Meditation is a practice that, in part, involves an open awareness to all incoming stimuli alongside the absence of any meta-cognitive interpretation or processing of said stimuli. This generation of a still mind may generate a more accurate prediction model of incoming stimuli, void of any corruption on the part of our thoughts. Given the observation that meditation, both scientifically and culturally, can lead to an understanding and experience of a greater oneness amongst all suggests that this interpretation of incoming stimuli is the more accurate interpretation. It is hard to imagine that anyone would not advocate the beauty and usefulness of this perspective. If more people had this perspective, we would have a much more peaceful, happy and unified society and planet. Ironically, our culture often aims to arrive to this philosophical perspective through analytical thought. However, given the evidence in this post, perhaps it is the absence of analytical thought, and the stillness of the mind that truly grants this perspective.

**References ** 1. Seth AK. Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2013;17(11):565-573. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.007 2. Synofzik M, Thier P, Leube DT, Schlotterbeck P, Lindner A. Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Brain. 2010;133(1):262-271. doi:10.1093/brain/awp291 3. Botvinick M, Cohen JD. Rubber hand ‘feels’ what eyes see. Nature. 1998;391(February):756. 4. Newberg A, Alavi A, Baime M, Pourdehnad M, Santanna J, D’Aquili E. The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during the complex cognitive task of meditation: A preliminary SPECT study. Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging. 2001;106(2):113-122. doi:10.1016/S0925-4927(01)00074-9 5. Ferri F, Chiarelli AM, Merla A, Gallese V, Costantini M. The body beyond the body: Expectation of a sensory event is enough to induce ownership over a fake hand. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013;280(1765). doi:10.5061/dryad.8f251 6. Suzuki K, Garfinkel SN, Critchley HD, Seth AK. Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(13):2909-2917. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.014 7. Zeidan F, Grant JA, Brown CA, McHaffie JG, Coghill RC. Mindfulness meditation-related pain relief: Evidence for unique brain mechanisms in the regulation of pain. Neuroscience Letters. 2012;520(2):165-173. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.082 8. Al-Obaidi SM, Beattie P, Al-Zoabi B, Al-Wekeel S. The relationship of anticipated pain and fear avoidance beliefs to outcome in patients with chronic low back pain who are not receiving workers’ compensation. Spine. 2005;30(9):1051-1057. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000160848.94706.83 9. Benedetti F, Mayberg HS, Wager TD, Stohler CS, Zubieta JK. Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect. In: Journal of Neuroscience. Vol 25. Society for Neuroscience; 2005:10390-10402. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3458-05.2005 10. Gard T, Hölzel BK, Sack AT, et al. Pain attenuation through mindfulness is associated with decreased cognitive control and increased sensory processing in the brain. Cerebral Cortex. 2012;22(11):2692-2702. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr352 11.Grant JA, Courtemanche J, Rainville P. A non-elaborative mental stance and decoupling of executive and pain-related cortices predicts low pain sensitivity in Zen meditators. Pain. 2011;152(1):150-156. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.006 12. Kabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R. The clinical use of mindfulness meditation for the self-regulation of chronic pain. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1985;8(2):163-190. doi:10.1007/BF00845519 13. Kakigi R, Nakata H, Inui K, et al. Intracerebral pain processing in a Yoga Master who claims not to feel pain during meditation. European Journal of Pain. 2005;9(5):581. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.12.006 14. Steeds CE. The anatomy and physiology of pain. Surgery. 2009;27(12):507-511. doi:10.1016/j.mpsur.2009.10.013 15. Min BK. A thalamic reticular networking model of consciousness. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling. 2010;7(1):1-18. doi:10.1186/1742-4682-7-10 16. Hasenkamp W, Wilson-Mendenhall CD, Duncan E, Barsalou LW. Mind wandering and attention during focused meditation: A fine-grained temporal analysis of fluctuating cognitive states. NeuroImage. 2012;59(1):750-760. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.008 17. Newberg AB, Waldman MR. A neurotheological approach to spiritual awakening. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies. 2019;37(2):119-130. doi:10.24972/ijts.2018.37.2.119 18. Johnstone B, Cohen D, Konopacki K, Ghan C. Selflessness as a Foundation of Spiritual Transcendence: Perspectives From the Neurosciences and Religious Studies. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2016;26(4):287-303. doi:10.1080/10508619.2015.1118328 19. Yaden DB, Haidt J, Hood RW, Vago DR, Newberg AB. The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of General Psychology. 2017;21(2):143-160. doi:10.1037/gpr0000102 20. Griffiths RR, Richards WA, McCann U, Jesse R. Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology. 2006;187(3):268-283. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0457-5 21. Griffiths RR, Richards WA, Johnson MW, McCann UD, Jesse R. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2008;22(6):621-632. doi:10.1177/0269881108094300 22. Serino A, Alsmith A, Costantini M, Mandrigin A, Tajadura-Jimenez A, Lopez C. Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition. 2013;22(4):1239-1252. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.08.013 23. Tsakiris M, Costantini M, Haggard P. The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one’s body. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(12):3014-3018. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.004 24. Herzog H, Leie VR, Kuweit T, Rota E, Ludwig K. Biological Psychology/Pharmacopsychology. Published online 1990:182-187.

@ 88cc134b:5ae99079

sasas sasa sasa

@ 88cc134b:5ae99079

article

@ f1989a96:bcaaf2c1

Good morning, readers!

Today, HRF takes part in the launch of the Bitcoin Humanitarian Alliance in London, where a dozen human rights and aid groups will convene with policymakers, media, finance professionals, and technologists at the Frontline Club to explain how they are using Bitcoin in their work in the field.

Elsewhere, we bring news from Turkey, where large, pro-democracy protests erupted over President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s increasing political repression and economic fallout. The Turkish regime has detained more than 2,000 protesters (and counting) as youth appear in droves demanding democracy, accountability, and economic reform.

In Eastern Africa, Tanzania’s government extended immense restrictions on foreign currency, effectively barring its use in day-to-day payments outside a few circumstances. In a poverty-stricken country where fuel prices have moved forcibly upward for two consecutive months, access to and usage of alternative currencies can be a financial lifeline.

In Bitcoin news, we spotlight Misty Breez, a new open-source Bitcoin wallet built by Lightning Network infrastructure company Breez. The wallet is a Lightning and Liquid Network hybrid wallet. It gives users control over their funds and abstracts away any complexities of payment channel management, but users must trust the Liquid Federation. In terms of functionality, Misty Breez supports a wide variety of address types, offering users flexibility across the fees, privacy, and censorship resistance of their payments. It may prove a helpful tool for dissidents and activists standing against tyranny.

We end with the latest edition of the HRF x Pubkey Freedom Tech Series, where HRF’s Ayelen Osorio joins Zimbabwean pastor-turned-activist Evan Mawarire, who recounts his inspiring journey of a peaceful uprising against Robert Mugabe’s dictatorship and the hyperinflation and repression he unleashed on the population. We also feature the live streams of the 2025 MIT Bitcoin Expo in collaboration with HRF. These videos highlight the speakers, panels, and activities led by HRF to raise awareness about financial repression and the tools being built to resist it.

Now, let’s jump right in!

SUBSCRIBE HERE

GLOBAL NEWS

Turkey | Government Detains Thousands of Pro-Democracy Protesters

The largest protests in over a decade erupted in Istanbul, Turkey, after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan detained political opposition figure and Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu. Turks of all walks of life find themselves united by common outrage at the regime’s ongoing political repression and tumultuous economic conditions. With inflation soaring above 39% and widespread unemployment among the nation’s youth, it’s no surprise Turks are flooding the streets and demanding change. In response to these demonstrations, law enforcement has since detained more than 2,000 demonstrators, and police blockades have met student protesters with water cannon trucks to suppress their dissent. Many young Turks feel their future is slipping away in a country where saving is futile, the currency is collapsing, and speaking out comes at a high personal cost. “This feels like our last chance,” one young protester said, adding, “If we don’t succeed, many of us will have to leave Turkey.”

Tanzania | Regime Enacts Restrictions on Foreign Currency

Tanzania’s regime is banning the use of foreign currency outside of a few circumstances (such as duty-free retailers and government membership fees). This means quoting prices in, accepting, or facilitating payments with foreign currency is now illegal, alongside declining to accept the official Tanzanian shilling (TZS). Losing the ability to transact with more stable currencies removes individuals’ ability to shield themselves from inflation and subjects them to local currency volatility. The mandate comes in addition to the Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority raising the cost of fuel for a second consecutive month. Locals worry this could further increase the cost of living as the fuel price hike ripples through the economy. These policies mirror the tactics of authoritarians using financial control to limit dissent and restrict individual financial freedom.

China | Incorporates e-CNY CBDC into Financial Sector Guidelines

China is incorporating the e-CNY central bank digital currency (CBDC) into financial sector guidelines for the first time, signaling a strengthening commitment to fully roll out its CBDC. The e-CNY’s usage is reportedly expanding among Chinese citizens, with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) claiming 800 million wallets and over 10.2 trillion CNY in transaction volume — though these numbers are both dubiously high and difficult to independently verify. As usage grows, so do concerns over financial and individual liberties. The CCP already uses the financial system to monitor and suppress dissent. For Uyghurs, a Muslim minority in the Uyghur Region grappling with ongoing cultural genocide, mass surveillance, and forced labor from the CCP, the e-CNY would allow the regime to restrict their financial autonomy and freedom completely. As it begins to roll out, it’s important to become aware of the dangers of the e-CNY here.

Burkina Faso | Arrests Three Journalists in Press Crackdown

Burkina Faso’s military junta arrested three journalists for reporting on regime-imposed press restrictions. Since seizing power in 2022, the military junta, under the leadership of Ibrahim Traoré, has targeted independent media by detaining reporters, forcing critics into exile, abusing emergency laws to suppress dissent, and using financial repression to disrupt independent funding. Journalists disappear under the guise of forced conscription, international coverage of military abuses is blocked, and outlets that report on crimes against humanity are eradicated. With press freedom in ashes, Burkinabés face an information blackout where state propaganda proliferates. In these contexts, open and uncensorable protocols like nostr can serve as a digital town square where information, value, and assembly flow undisturbed by the reach of oppressive regimes.

Tunisia | Saied Sacks Prime Minister as Economy Crumbles

Tunisian President Kais Saied dismissed Prime Minister Kamel Maddouri less than a year into his term and replaced him with Sara Zaafarani, Tunisia’s third prime minister in under two years. As Saied reshuffles his cabinet to best suit his interests and goals, Tunisia’s economy has reached a standstill. Growth is running below 1.5%, the cost of living continues to climb, and shortages of staple goods like rice, sugar, and coffee burden the everyday lives of Tunisians. After staging a coup, dissolving the government, and ruling by decree, Saied’s consolidation of power has come inch by inch with the erosion of democracy and financial stability.

BITCOIN AND FREEDOM TECH NEWS

Breez | Releases New Open-Source Bitcoin Wallet

Breez, a company helping build out the Bitcoin Lightning economy, released a new open-source Bitcoin wallet called “Misty Breez.” It is a hybrid Lightning and Liquid Network wallet built using the Nodeless Breez SDK. The wallet offers fast and private transactions without the complexities of payment channel management. The tradeoff? Trusting the Liquid Federation with custody of your Bitcoin. Still, Misty Breez supports many Bitcoin and Lightning features, including on-chain payments, Lightning addresses, BOLT 12 invoices, and offline receiving. So, while the wallet is a trust-minimized solution rather than fully custodial, users gain a wide range of use cases and features unique to this wallet. This could make Misty Breez useful for people facing financial surveillance, internet outages, or authoritarian-imposed financial restrictions. Learn more about the wallet here.

OpenCash | Bounty for Open Source Cashu x BTCPay Server Plugin

The OpenCash Association is offering a two million satoshi bounty for an open-source plugin allowing merchants to accept Cashu payments through BTCPay Server. Cashu is a Bitcoin-based ecash protocol designed to offer fast, low-cost, and very private transactions. For activists and dissidents, ecash enables payments without compromising financial privacy, but they must trust the mints (entities managing the system) to custody their funds. OpenCash specified that the Cashu plugin must integrate cleanly with BTCPay Server and include an input field for ecash redemption or a scannable Cashu payment request. If claimed, this bounty and subsequent integration will help advance Bitcoin’s medium of exchange capabilities and make private payments more accessible by integrating with self-hosted, independent Bitcoin payment infrastructure. Learn more about the bounty here.

Machankura | Adds Support for Offline Bitcoin Transactions in Uganda

Machankura, a custodial Bitcoin Lightning wallet that helps Africans access Bitcoin without the Internet, announced they expanded service to Uganda, enabling Ugandans to use Bitcoin without an Internet connection. To do so, Machankura leverages the Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) protocol for sending text messages. To use the service, users simply dial a designated number on a feature phone (or a smartphone without data) and can access the Bitcoin network in countries like Nigeria, Malawi, Zambia, and now Uganda. Machankura helps democratize Bitcoin access, expands censorship-resistant money across Africa, and offers a practical solution to financial inclusion. If you’re in Uganda or another supported country, try it here.

Zeus Wallet | Plans to Introduce Cashu Support

Zeus, a leading self-custodial mobile Lightning wallet, shared plans for a future Cashu integration. Cashu is an ecash protocol for Bitcoin. It enables practical everyday payments on Bitcoin that are private by design (but users must trust mints to manage their funds). By adding ecash support, Zeus can expand the accessibility of private Bitcoin payments and provide its users with greater flexibility over their financial activity. As part of its upcoming release, the wallet also introduces two new types of addresses: Zaplocker addresses for Lightning self-custody on mobile and Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC) addresses for remote node runners. While a little more technical, these integrations will improve individuals' ability to transact without exposing their financial history, reducing surveillance risks, especially for those living under authoritarian regimes or in jurisdictions with strict financial controls.

Bitcoin Thailand Festival | Half-Marathon to Challenge Financial Repression

The Thai city of Chiang Mai will host the nation’s inaugural Bitcoin Half Marathon and Bitcoin Thailand Festival from Nov. 1-2, 2025, under the theme “Run For Freedom.” The marathon’s theme contrasts Thailand’s increasing financial repression and long history of erasing dissent. Even still, the festival’s mission to advance financial freedom and financial literacy with participation from the local Bitcoin community comes at a pressing time. The Thai government is increasingly restricting financial freedoms through digital cash handouts, which, for all intents and purposes, function as a central bank digital currency that imposes spending restrictions and expiration dates on money. In these environments, Bitcoin education and awareness are more urgent than ever.

Btrust Builders | Announces Builders Pathways

Btrust Builders introduced Btrust Builders Pathways, a new program designed to equip African developers with the skills and experience needed to contribute to Bitcoin open-source software. The initiative offers five learning tracks, from beginner-friendly Bitcoin fundamentals to advanced Rust programming and Bitcoin Core development. Participants will gain hands-on experience, mentorship, and access to potential funding via Btrust Developer Grants. With this launch, Btrust Builders continues its mission to grow Africa’s Bitcoin development talent and strengthen the software’s ecosystem in a region where many suffer under dozens of authoritarian governments.

RECOMMENDED CONTENT

How Bitcoin Fights Corruption & Injustice with Evan Mawarire

In the latest edition of the HRF x Pubkey Freedom Tech Series, HRF’s Content & Research lead Ayelen Osorio sits down with Zimbabwean pastor-turned-activist Evan Mawarire to explore how Bitcoin can serve as a tool for fighting inflation, corruption, and injustice. Together, they unpack Mawarire’s personal journey of leading a peaceful uprising against the tyranny of Robert Mugabe and the hyperinflation he unleashed on his undeserving population. Mawarire details how Zimbabwe’s economic collapse became an orchestrated strategy to control and silence Zimbabweans. He further explains how the peaceful movement galvanized a generation, why financial repression is a central pillar of authoritarianism, and how Bitcoin offers ordinary citizens a way to resist and rebuild. Catch the full conversation here.

MIT Bitcoin Expo Livestream

Last week, software developers, human rights activists, students, and researchers gathered at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for the 12th annual MIT Bitcoin Expo — this year in partnership with HRF — to explore how Bitcoin and freedom technologies can defend civil liberties and empower individuals, especially under authoritarian regimes. Born from MIT’s 2014 Bitcoin Project, the expo has grown into a major forum for individual liberation, with panels, workshops, and hackathons centered on privacy, financial autonomy, and decentralized protocols. Tune into the livestream recording to catch the speakers, presentations, and panels that defined the event.

If this article was forwarded to you and you enjoyed reading it, please consider subscribing to the Financial Freedom Report here.

Support the newsletter by donating bitcoin to HRF’s Financial Freedom program via BTCPay.\ Want to contribute to the newsletter? Submit tips, stories, news, and ideas by emailing us at ffreport @ hrf.org

The Bitcoin Development Fund (BDF) is accepting grant proposals on an ongoing basis. The Bitcoin Development Fund is looking to support Bitcoin developers, community builders, and educators. Submit proposals here.

Subscribe to newsletter

Apply for a grant

Support our work

Visit our website

@ 2101a7ec:d9d8f2db

Ghostty is terminal manager with GPU acceleration and great looks. It works mostly out of the box, but you might want to do some setups to tailor it to your particular needs.

Here is how I set it up.

Installation

I won't spend much time on installation details, I installed it using brew there are multiple installation options, surprisingly flatpack is not within the options at the moment. For further details please check ghostty installation instructions.

Configuration

Config file is available on these locations

$HOME/Library/Application Support/com.mitchellh.ghostty/config

$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/ghostty/config

I use $XDG_CONFIG_HOME as I keep all my config there.

Configuration reference is available on line. And can be generated from the command line doing

ghostty +show-config --default --docs

And finally to list available themes ghostty +list-themes.

This is my config, it's available with my dotfiles

```config

~/.config/ghostty/config

to show the default configuration with documentation.

ghostty +show-config --default --docs

font-family = "JetBrains Mono"

font-size = 14

Run ghostty +list-themes to browse available themes.

theme = SynthwaveAlpha cursor-style = block

background-opacity = 0.96 background-blur-radius = 40

shell integration.

shell-integration = bash shell-integration-features = cursor, sudo, title

macos-titlebar-style = tabs

Auto-update Ghostty when a new release is available.

auto-update = download

mouse-hide-while-typing = true

keymaps

keybind = global:cmd+`=toggle_quick_terminal

keybind = cmd+left=previous_tab keybind = cmd+right=next_tab

byobu keybinds fix

macos-option-as-alt = left keybind = alt+left=unbind keybind = alt+right=unbind

quit-after-last-window-closed = true window-new-tab-position = end

```

I had some issues with SSH, so I added this to my ~/.ssh/config which fixed my issues.

ssh Host * # ghostty https://ghostty.org/docs/help/terminfo SetEnv TERM=xterm-256color # end ghostty

@ 7e538978:a5987ab6

After five years and over 6,000 commits, LNbits has reached a momentous milestone: Version 1.0.0 is here. LNbits is officially out of beta!

This release represents the five years relentless development, dedication, bug-hunting, feature-building, and community involvement. What started as a lightweight Lightning wallet application for Lightning Network payments has evolved into one of the most versatile, modular, and widely-used Bitcoin tools in the space.

We want to offer a heartfelt thank you to every contributor, developer, tester, and user—from those running LNbits for personal use to the communities and businesses who rely on it every day. Your feedback, bug reports, feature requests, and support have made LNbits what it is today.

🚀 Key Highlights in v1.0.0

• LNbits now at v1.0.0 – the software is stable, hardened, and production-ready.
• Vue 3 migration – a complete frontend overhaul for performance and long-term maintainability.
• WebSocket payments – faster and more efficient, replacing older SSE and long-polling methods.
• New lnbits.sh install script – simplifies setup and local deployment.
• Access Control Lists (ACL) – token-based permissions for powerful role and scope control.
• Admin tools:
• Admin payments overview
• Toggle outgoing payments
• View payments from deleted wallets
• NWC (Nostr Wallet Connect) support
• Login with Nostr or OAuth – expanding integration and authentication options

💱 Fiat & Exchange Upgrades

• Custom exchange providers
• Improved fiat precision
• Wallet-level fiat tracking and labels
• Support for Bitpay and Yadio fiat rate providers

🧑‍🎨 UI / UX Improvements New Login/Register interface

• Default theme for new users
• Custom background images
• Visual refresh with new themes (including neon and light/dark modes)
• Revamped Pay Invoice dialog and invoice creation
• Custom wallet icons/colours
• CSV export and in-wallet payment filtering

🛠️ Developer Tools & Internal Enhancements Migration to pyjwt, updated to breez-sdk 0.6.6, pyln-client 24.5

• Support for Python 3.10–3.13
• New nodemanager for managing Lightning channels
• Backend refactors, improved database handling, type hinting, and extension logic
• More robust testing and CI support

🩹 Maintenance & Fixes Persistent fix for admin removal bug

• Improved extension handling
• Bug fixes across wallet logic, funding sources, and legacy compatibility
• Dozens of improvements to reliability, performance, and developer experience

🎉 A Huge Thank You

To every developer, translator, tester, UX contributor, node runner, and user: thank you.

LNbits wouldn’t be what it is without your involvement. Whether you've written code, opened issues, translated labels, or simply used it and given feedback—this release is yours too.

Here's to the next chapter!

@ 34ff86e0:dbb6b9fb

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum

@ 7d33ba57:1b82db35

Tucked into Italy’s far northeastern corner, Trieste feels like a place where cultures meet and stories linger. With Austro-Hungarian architecture, Adriatic views, literary cafés, and a unique Central European flair, it’s Italy—but not quite like the Italy you know. Bordering Slovenia and once the seaport of an empire, Trieste is full of quiet charm and timeless elegance.

🌟 Top Things to Do in Trieste

1️⃣ Piazza Unità d’Italia

• One of Europe’s largest sea-facing squares
• Surrounded by grand buildings and open to the Adriatic—sunsets here are magical
• Great spot to sit at a café and people-watch

2️⃣ Castello di Miramare

• A fairy-tale white castle perched over the sea, built for Archduke Ferdinand Maximilian
• Explore the ornate interiors and stroll the surrounding park with sea views
• A short bus or bike ride from the city

3️⃣ Canal Grande & Borgo Teresiano

• A small Venetian-style canal lined with cafés, bridges, and boats
• At its end, you’ll find the neoclassical Sant’Antonio Nuovo church
• The area is perfect for evening walks and aperitivo

4️⃣ Caffè Culture & James Joyce Trail ☕📖

• Trieste has a legendary café scene—literary, elegant, and historic
• Visit Caffè San Marco or Caffè degli Specchi
• Follow the trail of James Joyce, who lived here for over a decade

5️⃣ Barcola Promenade

• A local favorite for seafront walks, swimming, and sunbathing
• Bring a towel, grab a gelato, and relax like a true Triestino
• Especially lively in summer

🏛️ Also Worth a Visit

• Teatro Romano – A well-preserved Roman theater right in the city center
• Castello di San Giusto & Cathedral – Hilltop views and Roman ruins nearby
• Risiera di San Sabba – A sobering WWII concentration camp memorial site

🍝 What to Eat in Trieste

• Jota – A hearty stew of sauerkraut, beans, and potatoes (Slavic roots!)
• Seafood everything – Fresh Adriatic catch, especially scampi and sardoni
• Strudel, goulash, and schnitzel – Trieste’s menu mixes Italian and Mitteleuropean
• Pair with local wines like Vitovska or a crisp Malvasia

🎯 Tips for Travelers

✅ Trieste is walkable and elegant—bring comfy shoes for those marble pavements
✅ Great base for day trips to Miramare Castle, Grotta Gigante, or even Ljubljana and Piran
✅ Try the osmize in the surrounding hills—rustic, family-run wine farms that open to the public
✅ Slovenian and Croatian borders are right nearby—Trieste is a crossroads city

@ a0c34d34:fef39af1

Let’s talk longevity and quality of life. Have you prepared for Passover or Easter? Do you celebrate either? I’m going to my niece’s house for Passover and I will be devouring brisket and strawberry shortcake. I use to love the Easter candy my neighbor shared when I was a kid. Taboo during Passover but I snuck a peep or two. How afraid are you about the future? Are you keeping up with longevity technology? Do you have the dream of living a long, long life? Longevity technology combines the power of medicine, biotechnology and artificial intelligence to extend a healthy human lifespan. It’s about using cutting edge technology and medical advancements to extend the years we live in good health. The focus is on quality of life during extended years. With the rise of AI powered longevity clinics, treatments tailored to an individual’s genetic profile, lifestyle and medical history, and customized anti-aging interventions, personalized healthcare will become a reality over the next decade. I’m scared I won’t be able to afford housing or healthcare. Advanced medical services cost money, and they are only going to rise. As we stay independent longer and capable of living on our own, there will be more “smart” solutions available, more longevity technology advances. Imagine using the technology of today to have a home where you feel safe for your mother or grandmother so they can live independently. The costs of technology for a “smart” house? Running lights on the floorboards light up as you walk by, just one item I can think of that can keep senior citizens safe at home. I developed a plan for a 55+ community for senior citizens. I have seen similar plans. I think blockchain technology and utilizing tokenomics can only make housing cost effective for senior citizens in the future. When I sat down and wrote the Executive Summary for Onboard60 three years ago, a component was to develop a 55+ Active Senior Community using tokenomics, smart contracts and blockchain technology. Since then, when I say I want to make Onboard60 like the AARP of today, I’ve been told that’s impossible, not going to work and I am wasting my time with this whole project, senior citizens aren’t interested. They will be. As we move into a population explosion of senior citizens living longer, healthy and independently, I think we need to consider how we are going to afford our longevity. What type of care will you receive, how much will it cost? What will you be able to control as in the cost, the level of care you receive. What currency is used? Yes, currency. As we move forward with the integration of cryptocurrency into our financial system, we need to think of what currency is accepted. There will be facilities that use their own stablecoin or accept certain others. The non-traditional financial systems are here to stay. The United States has incorporated a few different cryptocurrencies. Large financial institutions have adapted to putting cryptocurrency into their investment portfolios. I didn’t expect this to happen in my lifetime. Seriously, I thought Onboard60 would have a few more years to develop, create a community of senior citizens. That’s not the case. The world is accelerating at an impossible rate to keep up with everything. It can be overwhelming and scary. How do I find companies that use blockchain and smart contracts? Are there companies where I can protect my property rights by putting them on chain? Are there health insurance companies that use smart contracts? Onboard60 is more than the Metaverse, YouTube and A Handbook for Noobies (Web3 1101 for Seniors). It’s about staying informed, safely, to achieve the future every senior citizen deserves. If you have any knowledge of such companies, please let me know. I have crypto accountants and lawyers in my toolbox. I look forward to adding to my toolbox. I want to be like the AARP for today’s world.

Thanks for reading, Be fabulous, Sandra Abrams Founder Onboard60

@ 4fe14ef2:f51992ec

Hey Bitcoiners,

Leave a comment below to share your hustles and wins. Let us know what you've sold this week. Have you sold it for #sats or #zaps? It doesn't matter how big or small your item is, solid or #digital, product or #service.

Just share below what you’ve listed, swapped, and sold. Let everyone rave on your latest #deals!

New to ~AGORA? Dive into the #marketplace and turn your dusty gears into shiny #BTC!

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/939612

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

社交应用正迎来全新阶段：从传统的中心化平台迈向去中心化生态，用户对轻量级、智能化和隐私保护的应用需求与日俱增。在这一趋势下，Mini Apps 凭借其快速开发、灵活部署和去中心化的特性，正在成为社交应用的主流选择。加密货币支付的兴起进一步推动了这一趋势，其低成本、无国界和金融自由的优势，不仅大幅降低了交易门槛，还为 Mini Apps 的规模化发展注入了强劲动力。作为比特币生态 Nostr 协议上最受欢迎的去中心化社交支付客户端之一，YakiHonne 凭借卓越的用户体验和便捷的社交支付功能，覆盖全球 170 多个国家。如今，YakiHonne 即将推出可编程 Smart Widgets——一款支持 Mini Apps 的开发者组件。这款产品将重新定义用户在社交平台上的互动与消费方式，为链上应用生态和社交支付带来全新活力。

YakiHonne Smart Widgets：社交与消费的创新引擎

YakiHonne Smart Widgets 是一款融入社交动态的可编程微型应用，让用户在浏览内容时就能轻松完成链上支付、互动和操作。它不仅是一款工具，更是一个开放的去中心化应用市场，为用户和开发者带来无限创造力与灵活性。

Smart Widgets 提供三种简单易用的创建方式，满足不同用户的需求：

• 基础组件（Basic Widgets）：任何用户都能通过直观编辑器快速创建，只需选择模板、输入内容，就能生成打赏、Mint 或投票等互动功能。用户在浏览动态时，点击按钮即可完成链上操作，体验快速、无需跳转。
• 动作组件（ActionWidgets）：用户可通过嵌入应用链接快速创建，无需开发经验。普通用户点击动态中的按钮，就能直接在当前界面访问外部去中心化应用（如交易所），享受顺畅不中断的体验。
• 工具组件（Tool Widgets-Mini App）：适合有开发能力的用户或开发者，通过 Smart Widgets SDK 打造功能更丰富的应用，支持复杂链上操作。用户在社交动态中即可完成数据查询、链上任务、游戏互动或即时支付，体验高度集成且流畅。

主要特性：

• 快速构建：开发者仅需数小时即可将创意变为现实，支持常用 Web 技术，打造接近原生应用的体验，无需繁琐的应用商店审核。
• 社交登录：用户无需账号密码即可进入 Mini Apps，直接使用 Nostr/YakiHonne 身份在动态中互动，流程简单，社交体验更紧密。
• 易于发现与留存：通过动态 feeds 一键发现新应用，内置裂变机制助力快速传播，Mini App 商店提供更多选择，用户可保存喜爱应用并通过通知随时回归。
• 即时互动与消费：Mini Apps 通过 YakiHonne 的社交支付功能基础设施实现无缝集成，用户无需离开动态即可完成支付、投票或游戏等操作。社交互动与链上行为自然融合，消费体验轻松融入每一次互动场景。

改变日常体验：Smart Widgets 的多场景应用

YakiHonne Smart Widgets 将社交互动与链上消费深度结合，为用户带来多样化的应用场景：

• 链上互动：用户在浏览动态时，可通过 Smart Widgets 参与链上投票或轻量游戏。例如，一键完成社区提案投票，或与好友挑战链上小游戏，互动即刻完成，无需跳转。
• 智能 Agent：用户可使用 Agent Widgets 自动创作并发布内容，例如生成个性化帖子或短视频，打造 AI 驱动的新型媒体体验。
• DAO 治理：基于aMACI创建匿名投票，结合 Agent 实现自主治理。用户直接在社交动态中参与 DAO 决策，推动去中心化社区发展。
• 社交支付：用户可通过动态发送即时支付或链上红包，例如分享一笔小额打赏，激发好友互动与消费转化。
• 订阅服务：支持内容创作者或应用的连续订阅，用户一键订阅喜爱的服务，享受无缝续费体验。

这些场景不仅提升了用户的参与感和便利性，还为创作者、开发者及社区提供了新的增长机会。

引领新趋势：Smart Widgets 的生态价值

YakiHonne Smart Widgets 的推出将为链上消费应用生态和社交支付带来深远影响。它为开发者提供了一个开放的舞台，任何人都可以通过 Widgets 快速部署创新应用，丰富 YakiHonne 的生态多样性。YakiHonne 的社交支付功能基础设施进一步为 Mini Apps 赋能，提供高效的支付支持，降低了开发者的支付集成成本，同时为用户带来安全、便捷的交易体验。这种支持不仅加速了 Mini Apps 的商业化进程，还推动了链上消费的规模化增长。

对于用户而言，Smart Widgets 将社交互动与消费行为融为一体，创造更具沉浸感和实用性的数字体验。对于内容创作者和社区，它则提供了一个低门槛的链上入口，助力其触达全球用户。这一产品不仅是对技术边界的探索，更是对未来去中心化生活方式的预演。YakiHonne 致力于通过 Smart Widgets 构建一个开放、活跃的社交与消费生态，让每一次互动都成为链上价值流动的起点。

立即体验：Smart Widgets 等你探索

YakiHonne 诚邀全球用户和开发者共同参与这一激动人心的旅程。开发者可申请加入 Smart Widgets SDK 测试计划，开发属于自己的 Mini Apps，与 YakiHonne 的全球用户群共享成果。用户则可关注 YakiHonne 官方渠道（X或下载YakiHonne iOS/Android），体验链上互动与社交支付的全新可能。

@ 3b3a42d3:d192e325

Atomic Signature Swaps (ASS) over Nostr is a protocol for atomically exchanging Schnorr signatures using Nostr events for orchestration. This new primitive enables multiple interesting applications like:

• Getting paid to publish specific Nostr events
• Issuing automatic payment receipts
• Contract signing in exchange for payment
• P2P asset exchanges
• Trading and enforcement of asset option contracts
• Payment in exchange for Nostr-based credentials or access tokens
• Exchanging GMs 🌞

It only requires that (i) the involved signatures be Schnorr signatures using the secp256k1 curve and that (ii) at least one of those signatures be accessible to both parties. These requirements are naturally met by Nostr events (published to relays), Taproot transactions (published to the mempool and later to the blockchain), and Cashu payments (using mints that support NUT-07, allowing any pair of these signatures to be swapped atomically.

How the Cryptographic Magic Works 🪄

This is a Schnorr signature (Zₓ, s):

s = z + H(Zₓ || P || m)⋅k

If you haven't seen it before, don't worry, neither did I until three weeks ago.

The signature scalar s is the the value a signer with private key k (and public key P = k⋅G) must calculate to prove his commitment over the message m given a randomly generated nonce z (Zₓ is just the x-coordinate of the public point Z = z⋅G). H is a hash function (sha256 with the tag "BIP0340/challenge" when dealing with BIP340), || just means to concatenate and G is the generator point of the elliptic curve, used to derive public values from private ones.

Now that you understand what this equation means, let's just rename z = r + t. We can do that, z is just a randomly generated number that can be represented as the sum of two other numbers. It also follows that z⋅G = r⋅G + t⋅G ⇔ Z = R + T. Putting it all back into the definition of a Schnorr signature we get:

s = (r + t) + H((R + T)ₓ || P || m)⋅k

Which is the same as:

s = sₐ + t where sₐ = r + H((R + T)ₓ || P || m)⋅k

sₐ is what we call the adaptor signature scalar) and t is the secret. ((R + T)ₓ, sₐ) is an incomplete signature that just becomes valid by add the secret t to the sₐ:

s = sₐ + t

What is also important for our purposes is that by getting access to the valid signature s, one can also extract t from it by just subtracting sₐ:

t = s - sₐ

The specific value of t depends on our choice of the public point T, since R is just a public point derived from a randomly generated nonce r.

So how do we choose T so that it requires the secret t to be the signature over a specific message m' by an specific public key P'? (without knowing the value of t)

Let's start with the definition of t as a valid Schnorr signature by P' over m':

t = r' + H(R'ₓ || P' || m')⋅k' ⇔ t⋅G = r'⋅G + H(R'ₓ || P' || m')⋅k'⋅G

That is the same as:

T = R' + H(R'ₓ || P' || m')⋅P'

Notice that in order to calculate the appropriate T that requires t to be an specific signature scalar, we only need to know the public nonce R' used to generate that signature.

In summary: in order to atomically swap Schnorr signatures, one party P' must provide a public nonce R', while the other party P must provide an adaptor signature using that nonce:

sₐ = r + H((R + T)ₓ || P || m)⋅k where T = R' + H(R'ₓ || P' || m')⋅P'

P' (the nonce provider) can then add his own signature t to the adaptor signature sₐ in order to get a valid signature by P, i.e. s = sₐ + t. When he publishes this signature (as a Nostr event, Cashu transaction or Taproot transaction), it becomes accessible to P that can now extract the signature t by P' and also make use of it.

Important considerations

A signature may not be useful at the end of the swap if it unlocks funds that have already been spent, or that are vulnerable to fee bidding wars.

When a swap involves a Taproot UTXO, it must always use a 2-of-2 multisig timelock to avoid those issues.

Cashu tokens do not require this measure when its signature is revealed first, because the mint won't reveal the other signature if they can't be successfully claimed, but they also require a 2-of-2 multisig timelock when its signature is only revealed last (what is unavoidable in cashu for cashu swaps).

For Nostr events, whoever receives the signature first needs to publish it to at least one relay that is accessible by the other party. This is a reasonable expectation in most cases, but may be an issue if the event kind involved is meant to be used privately.

How to Orchestrate the Swap over Nostr?

Before going into the specific event kinds, it is important to recognize what are the requirements they must meet and what are the concerns they must address. There are mainly three requirements:

• Both parties must agree on the messages they are going to sign
• One party must provide a public nonce
• The other party must provide an adaptor signature using that nonce

There is also a fundamental asymmetry in the roles of both parties, resulting in the following significant downsides for the party that generates the adaptor signature:

• NIP-07 and remote signers do not currently support the generation of adaptor signatures, so he must either insert his nsec in the client or use a fork of another signer
• There is an overhead of retrieving the completed signature containing the secret, either from the blockchain, mint endpoint or finding the appropriate relay
• There is risk he may not get his side of the deal if the other party only uses his signature privately, as I have already mentioned
• There is risk of losing funds by not extracting or using the signature before its timelock expires. The other party has no risk since his own signature won't be exposed by just not using the signature he received.

The protocol must meet all those requirements, allowing for some kind of role negotiation and while trying to reduce the necessary hops needed to complete the swap.

Swap Proposal Event (kind:455)

This event enables a proposer and his counterparty to agree on the specific messages whose signatures they intend to exchange. The content field is the following stringified JSON:

{     "give": <signature spec (required)>,     "take": <signature spec (required)>,     "exp": <expiration timestamp (optional)>,     "role": "<adaptor | nonce (optional)>",     "description": "<Info about the proposal (optional)>",     "nonce": "<Signature public nonce (optional)>",     "enc_s": "<Encrypted signature scalar (optional)>" }

The field role indicates what the proposer will provide during the swap, either the nonce or the adaptor. When this optional field is not provided, the counterparty may decide whether he will send a nonce back in a Swap Nonce event or a Swap Adaptor event using the nonce (optionally) provided by in the Swap Proposal in order to avoid one hop of interaction.

The enc_s field may be used to store the encrypted scalar of the signature associated with the nonce, since this information is necessary later when completing the adaptor signature received from the other party.

A signature spec specifies the type and all necessary information for producing and verifying a given signature. In the case of signatures for Nostr events, it contain a template with all the fields, except pubkey, id and sig:

{ "type": "nostr", "template": { "kind": "<kind>"        "content": "<content>"        "tags": [ … ],        "created_at": "<created_at>" } }

In the case of Cashu payments, a simplified signature spec just needs to specify the payment amount and an array of mints trusted by the proposer:

{   "type": "cashu",   "amount": "<amount>",   "mint": ["<acceptable mint_url>", …] }

This works when the payer provides the adaptor signature, but it still needs to be extended to also work when the payer is the one receiving the adaptor signature. In the later case, the signature spec must also include a timelock and the derived public keys Y of each Cashu Proof, but for now let's just ignore this situation. It should be mentioned that the mint must be trusted by both parties and also support Token state check (NUT-07) for revealing the completed adaptor signature and P2PK spending conditions (NUT-11) for the cryptographic scheme to work.

The tags are:

• "p", the proposal counterparty's public key (required)
• "a", a kind:30455 Swap Listing event or an application specific version of it (optional)

Forget about this Swap Listing event for now, I will get to it later...

Swap Nonce Event (kind:456) - Optional

This is an optional event for the Swap Proposal receiver to provide the public nonce of his signature when the proposal does not include a nonce or when he does not want to provide the adaptor signature due to the downsides previously mentioned. The content field is the following stringified JSON:

{     "nonce": "<Signature public nonce>",     "enc_s": "<Encrypted signature scalar (optional)>" }

And the tags must contain:

• "e", a kind:455 Swap Proposal Event (required)
• "p", the counterparty's public key (required)

Swap Adaptor Event (kind:457)

The content field is the following stringified JSON:

{ "adaptors": [ {         "sa": "<Adaptor signature scalar>",         "R": "<Signer's public nonce (including parity byte)>",         "T": "<Adaptor point (including parity byte)>",         "Y": "<Cashu proof derived public key (if applicable)>",     }, …],     "cashu": "<Cashu V4 token (if applicable)>" }

And the tags must contain:

• "e", a kind:455 Swap Proposal Event (required)
• "p", the counterparty's public key (required)

Discoverability

The Swap Listing event previously mentioned as an optional tag in the Swap Proposal may be used to find an appropriate counterparty for a swap. It allows a user to announce what he wants to accomplish, what his requirements are and what is still open for negotiation.

Swap Listing Event (kind:30455)

The content field is the following stringified JSON:

{ "description": "<Information about the listing (required)>", "give": <partial signature spec (optional)>, "take": <partial signature spec (optional)>, "examples: [<take signature spec>], // optional "exp": <expiration timestamp (optional)>, "role": "<adaptor | nonce (optional)>" }

The description field describes the restrictions on counterparties and signatures the user is willing to accept.

A partial signature spec is an incomplete signature spec used in Swap Proposal events kind:455 where omitting fields signals that they are still open for negotiation.

The examples field is an array of signature specs the user would be willing to take.

The tags are:

• "d", a unique listing id (required)
• "s", the status of the listing draft | open | closed (required)
• "t", topics related to this listing (optional)
• "p", public keys to notify about the proposal (optional)

Application Specific Swap Listings

Since Swap Listings are still fairly generic, it is expected that specific use cases define new event kinds based on the generic listing. Those application specific swap listing would be easier to filter by clients and may impose restrictions and add new fields and/or tags. The following are some examples under development:

Sponsored Events

This listing is designed for users looking to promote content on the Nostr network, as well as for those who want to monetize their accounts by sharing curated sponsored content with their existing audiences.

It follows the same format as the generic Swap Listing event, but uses the kind:30456 instead.

The following new tags are included:

• "k", event kind being sponsored (required)
• "title", campaign title (optional)

It is required that at least one signature spec (give and/or take) must have "type": "nostr" and also contain the following tag ["sponsor", "<pubkey>", "<attestation>"] with the sponsor's public key and his signature over the signature spec without the sponsor tag as his attestation. This last requirement enables clients to disclose and/or filter sponsored events.

Asset Swaps

This listing is designed for users looking for counterparties to swap different assets that can be transferred using Schnorr signatures, like any unit of Cashu tokens, Bitcoin or other asset IOUs issued using Taproot.

It follows the same format as the generic Swap Listing event, but uses the kind:30457 instead.

It requires the following additional tags:

• "t", asset pair to be swapped (e.g. "btcusd")
• "t", asset being offered (e.g. "btc")
• "t", accepted payment method (e.g. "cashu", "taproot")

Swap Negotiation

From finding an appropriate Swap Listing to publishing a Swap Proposal, there may be some kind of negotiation between the involved parties, e.g. agreeing on the amount to be paid by one of the parties or the exact content of a Nostr event signed by the other party. There are many ways to accomplish that and clients may implement it as they see fit for their specific goals. Some suggestions are:

• Adding kind:1111 Comments to the Swap Listing or an existing Swap Proposal
• Exchanging tentative Swap Proposals back and forth until an agreement is reached
• Simple exchanges of DMs
• Out of band communication (e.g. Signal)

Work to be done

I've been refining this specification as I develop some proof-of-concept clients to experience its flaws and trade-offs in practice. I left the signature spec for Taproot signatures out of the current document as I still have to experiment with it. I will probably find some important orchestration issues related to dealing with 2-of-2 multisig timelocks, which also affects Cashu transactions when spent last, that may require further adjustments to what was presented here.

The main goal of this article is to find other people interested in this concept and willing to provide valuable feedback before a PR is opened in the NIPs repository for broader discussions.

References

• GM Swap- Nostr client for atomically exchanging GM notes. Live demo available here.
• Sig4Sats Script - A Typescript script demonstrating the swap of a Cashu payment for a signed Nostr event.
• Loudr- Nostr client under development for sponsoring the publication of Nostr events. Live demo available at loudr.me.
• Poelstra, A. (2017). Scriptless Scripts. Blockstream Research. https://github.com/BlockstreamResearch/scriptless-scripts

@ fbf0e434:e1be6a39

Hackathon 概要

Cambrian Hack 是一场最近的在线比赛，旨在吸引开发人员使用 Cambrian SDK 和 Jito Restaking 开发 Node Consensus Networks (NCNs)。此次活动吸引了88位注册开发人员，最终产生了九个批准项目。参与者专注于快速部署 NCN，探索如 AI 协处理器、预言机网络和区块链桥梁等应用。Hackathon 结束时，Cambrian 和 Jito 团队为前三名项目颁发了奖项。奖池的一部分包括 Cambrian 奖励 NFT，可以转换为 Cambrian 代币。

此次 Hackathon 强调了 Cambrian SDK 通过简化流程加速 NCN 开发的能力，减少了对大型团队的需求，并提供了预建组件。评估标准包括技术复杂性、市场潜力和创新性。

活动以在 Solana Apex 开普敦宣布获奖者而告终。Cambrian Hack 为开发者提供了与技术专家联系的机会，通过工作坊提升技能，并对 web3 和 Solana 生态系统的发展做出贡献。

Hackathon 获奖者

Cambrian NCN Builder 卓越奖获奖者

• Ping Project: 该项目通过在 Solana 区块链上使用 PoS 共识以及 Cambrian SDK 和 Jito Restaking 技术，强化网络完整性并管理奖励分配，提供去中心化的内容传递服务。
• Ant Vault: 结合 ElizaOS AI 代理与 Cambrian oracle 战略性管理 DeFi，提供智能化市场挑战解决方案。
• STABLE-FUNDS: Solana 上的平台，用于创建稳定币，集成去中心化预言机和质押机制，以连接政府支持的证券和 DeFi。

Cambrian 生态系统创新者奖获奖者

• NebulaCDN: 一种去中心化的内容传递网络，利用 Web3 技术提供高效且抗审查的数据分发。
• Kamui: 一个经济高效、安全的 Solana VRF oracle，旨在提供可靠且负担得起的随机性解决方案。

有关更多详情，请访问 Cambrian Hack BUIDL。

关于组织者

Cambrian

Cambrian 因其对技术和区块链发展的贡献而受到认可。该组织专注于创新区块链应用，已进行多项项目以提升数字基础设施。其成就包括与行业领袖合作开发安全高效的区块链系统。Cambrian 目前正在扩展其对去中心化技术的关注，努力提升不同平台的可访问性和安全性。通过其专业知识，Cambrian 在不断演变的技术和区块链产业中扮演着重要角色。

@ fbf0e434:e1be6a39

Hackathon 概要

Core Global Gaming Hackathon 圆满落幕。作为去中心化游戏领域的重要活动，其吸引了众多参与者。在 231 位注册开发者中，86 个项目获得批准，所有项目共同竞逐 38 万美元的奖金池。此次黑客松鼓励在 Bitcoin 与 Core 平台上进行游戏开发，着重强调去中心化游戏的创新。

活动通过激发参与者拓宽去中心化游戏开发的视野，催生出一系列创新参赛作品。它为开发者搭建了与活跃社区互动的平台，既能激发创意，也可能对游戏未来发展方向产生影响。

活动取得了显著成果，例如将 Core Chain 技术融入游戏应用，展现了利用去中心化平台的独特思路。2025 年 3 月 24 日，活动以 Demo Day 收官，现场展示最终项目并公布获奖者。总体而言，这场黑客松凸显了区块链技术在游戏领域的潜力，也体现了开发者们力求影响行业发展的合作精神。

Hackathon 获奖者

超休闲游戏奖获奖者

• Farming Saga：一款专注于建立农业帝国的策略和模拟游戏，特色为动态挑战和NFT整合以丰富游戏玩法。
• Zenista：一款闲置游戏，旨在通过经营虚拟水疗中心提供放松体验，设计用于提供自我护理体验。
• Market Magnate：一款零售模拟游戏，结合区块链实现真正的资产所有权，强调策略、创意和管理。

社交游戏PvP（玩家对玩家）奖获奖者

• Core Arena：一款PvP游戏，允许在战斗中使用任何ERC-721 NFT，并自动分配技能，促进NFT社区间的统一并延长项目生命周期。
• Fight For Tcore：一款基于区块链的实时PvP游戏，玩家参与双人对决并下注TCORE代币，利用智能合约实现去中心化游戏玩法。
• CoreVerse Battleground：一款实时多人区块链游戏，提供NFT交易和基于Core Blockchain的游戏内货币。

益智游戏奖获奖者

• Temporal Odyssey：一款基于区块链的益智游戏，提供跨越多样世界的解谜NFT奖励。
• Dungeon：提供程序生成的地牢探险体验，结合区块链元素，允许玩家将成就铸造成Dungeon Tokens ($DGN)。
• Skateflow：一款无尽滑板游戏，实施区块链技术实现潜在的游戏内奖励。

欲了解所有项目的更多详细信息，请访问Core Gaming Hackathon 页面。

关于组织者

Core DAO

Core DAO是一个专注于推进区块链技术的去中心化自治组织。其主要关注点在于增强去中心化和促进区块链生态系统中的社区驱动治理。Core DAO因其对开发创新共识机制和智能合约解决方案的贡献而受到认可。该组织采取重大措施以提高去中心化网络的可扩展性和安全性。目前，Core DAO致力于培育开放、包容的区块链环境，倡导技术进步，并支持社区主导的开发举措，以促进去中心化技术的全球采用。

@ 20986fb8:cdac21b3

Social apps are entering a new era, evolving from traditional centralized platforms to decentralized ecosystems. Users increasingly demand lightweight, intelligent, and privacy-focused applications. In this shift, Mini Apps have emerged as a mainstream choice for social applications, thanks to their rapid development, flexible deployment, and decentralized nature. The rise of cryptocurrency payments has further fueled this trend, offering low-cost, borderless, and financially liberating solutions that significantly lower transaction barriers and drive the scalability of Mini Apps. As one of the most popular decentralized social payment clients on the Bitcoin ecosystem’s Nostr protocol, YakiHonne has earned a global reputation for its exceptional user experience and seamless social payment features, reaching over 170 countries. Now, YakiHonne is set to launch its programmable Smart Widgets—a developer toolkit for Mini Apps. This product will redefine how users interact and transact on social platforms, bringing fresh energy to the on-chain app ecosystem and social payments.

Smart Widgets: A Game-Changer for Social and On-Chain Consumption

YakiHonne Smart Widgets are programmable mini-apps embedded within social feeds, enabling users to effortlessly make on-chain payments, engage in interactions, and perform actions without leaving their content stream. More than just a tool, Smart Widgets serve as an open, decentralized app store, empowering both users and developers with unparalleled creativity and flexibility.

Smart Widgets come in three user-friendly formats to meet diverse needs:

• Basic Widgets: Anyone can create these using an intuitive editor—just pick a template, add content, and generate features like zap, minting, or voting. Users can interact with these actions directly in their feed with a single click, enjoying a fast, seamless experience.
• Action Widgets: Users can quickly create these by embedding app links, no coding required. With a single tap on a button in the feed, users can access external decentralized apps (like exchanges) right within the interface, ensuring a smooth, uninterrupted experience.
• Tool Widgets (Mini Apps): Designed for developers or users with coding skills, these are built using the Smart Widgets SDK to create more advanced apps with complex on-chain operations. Users can perform tasks like data queries, on-chain actions, gaming, or instant payments directly in their social feed, with a highly integrated and fluid experience.

Key Features:

• Rapid Development: Developers can turn ideas into reality in just hours, using familiar web technologies to create near-native app experiences—no lengthy app store reviews required.
• Social Login: Users can access Mini Apps without usernames or passwords, using their Nostr/YakiHonne identity to interact seamlessly within their social feed, making the experience more connected and effortless.
• Easy Discovery and Retention: With one-tap discovery through social feeds, built-in viral growth mechanics, and a Mini App store for more options, users can explore new apps effortlessly. They can save favorites and get notifications to return for more.
• Instant Interaction and Consumption: Mini Apps integrate seamlessly with YakiHonne’s social payment infrastructure, allowing users to pay, vote, or play games without leaving their feed. Social engagement and on-chain actions blend naturally, with consumption woven effortlessly into every interaction.

Transforming Daily Experiences: Smart Widgets in Action

YakiHonne Smart Widgets bridge social engagement and on-chain consumption, delivering a wide range of use cases: - On-Chain Interactions: While browsing their feed, users can join on-chain votes or play lightweight games through Smart Widgets—like casting a vote on a community proposal or challenging a friend to a quick game, all without leaving the app. - Smart Agents: Users can leverage Agent Widgets to auto-create and share content, such as personalized posts or short videos, powering an AI-driven media experience. - DAO Governance: Using aMACI for anonymous voting, combined with Agent Widgets for autonomous governance, users can participate in DAO decisions directly within their feed, fostering decentralized community growth. - Social Zap: Users can send small tips through their feed, like rewarding a friend’s post with an on-chain token, sparking more engagement and driving consumption. - Content Subscriptions: Support creators or apps with ongoing subscriptions—users can subscribe to their favorite services with one tap, enjoying a seamless renewal experience.

These scenarios not only boost user engagement and convenience but also open new growth opportunities for creators, developers, and communities.

Shaping the Future: The Ecosystem Impact of Smart Widgets

YakiHonne Smart Widgets are poised to transform the on-chain app ecosystem and social payments. They provide an open platform for developers, enabling anyone to deploy innovative apps quickly and enrich YakiHonne’s ecosystem. YakiHonne’s social payment infrastructure further empowers Mini Apps by offering efficient payment support, reducing integration costs for developers while ensuring a secure, seamless transaction experience for users. This support accelerates the commercialization of Mini Apps and fuels the growth of on-chain consumption.

For users, Smart Widgets seamlessly blend social interaction with consumption, creating an immersive and practical digital experience. For creators and communities, they offer a low-barrier entry to on-chain opportunities, helping them connect with a global audience. This product isn’t just a technological leap—it’s a glimpse into the future of decentralized lifestyles. YakiHonne is committed to building an open, vibrant social and consumption ecosystem through Smart Widgets, where every interaction sparks on-chain value.

Join the Future: Explore Smart Widgets Today

YakiHonne invites users and developers worldwide to join this exciting journey. Developers can apply to join the Smart Widgets SDK testing program, creating their own Mini Apps and tapping into YakiHonne’s global user base. Users can follow YakiHonne on official channels –X or download the YakiHonne iOS/Android app– to experience the next generation of on-chain interactions and social payments.

YakiHonne Programmable Smart Widgets are set to launch a new chapter for social and on-chain consumption. Let’s embrace this transformation together!

@ 57d1a264:69f1fee1

Some banners to promote ~Design territory in the Wild Web. Interested to kand feedback now your thought on it.

| Banner | Content | |---|---| | ![](https://m.stacker.news/86418) | Stop scrolling, start stacking! Your #insights, your #stories, your #code – they have real #value. On #StackerNews #Design, we believe in rewarding #quality contents. Turn your #passion and #knowledge into #Bitcoin. Share your v#oice and get rewarded for it, join the conversation! Explore now: https://stacker.news/~Design/r/Design_r #Bitcoin #LightningNetwork #Community #ContentCreation #EarnBitcoin #Tech #SNdesign | | ![](https://m.stacker.news/86419) | Stop scrolling, start flourishing! Your unique 3perspective, your groundbreaking #ideas, your niche #knowledge – it all has #value. On #StackerNews #Design we #reward you with #Bitcoin, instantly via the #LightningNetwork. Don't let your #insights fade into the #digital noise. Join a community that values #contribution, fuels #innovation, and puts the #power back in your #diamondhands (and #wallet!). Turn your thoughts into #zaps? Join the conversation: https://stacker.news/~Design/r/Design_r #Bitcoin #Lightning #Network #Community #EarnBitcoin #Tech #Design #Innovation #ContentCreation #Crypto | | ![](https://m.stacker.news/86420) | Stop scrolling, #stack #sats for your #insights! #StackerNews #Design is where your #creative spark meets the #LightningNetwork. Discuss #ideas, share your #work, and #earn #Bitcoin for valuable contributions. Join a vibrant #community shaping the #future of #creativity and #tech, one #zap at a time. Explore the intersection of #innovation and #functionality https://stacker.news/~Design/r/Design_r #StackerNews #BitcoinDesign #DesignCommunity #Lightning #Network #UIDesign #UXDesign #Crypto #EarnBitcoin | | ![](https://m.stacker.news/86421) | Stop scrolling, start stacking #sats! Talk #Design on #StackerNews – the platform where your #insights on #Tech, #Design, #Finance, #econ, #Food #DIY and more actually earn you real #Bitcoin via the #LightningNetwork. Join a vibrant #community, #discover diverse #perspectives, and #EarnBitcoin for sharing valuable content. Explore the #future of #contentCreation: https://stacker.news/~Design/r/Design_r #StackerNews #Lightning #Network #Crypto #Tech #Finance #Design #ContentCreator #GetPaidInBitcoin #SocialMedia #Community #BitconAccepted | | ![](https://m.stacker.news/86422) | #StackerNews #Design is where your engagement actually #pays. #Earn #Bitcoin instantly via #zaps just for sharing great unique #content and joining #discussions on everything from #innovative #tech to #creative #ideas. Discover diverse #opinion, connect with a #community, start #earning. Join the #future of content: https://stacker.news/~Design/r/Design_r #LightningNetwork #EarnBitcoin #CryptoCommunity #ContentCreators #StackerNews #Decentralized #SocialMedia |

originally posted at https://stacker.news/items/939548

@ f6488c62:c929299d

  ในโลกของ DeFi (Decentralized Finance) ที่เติบโตอย่างรวดเร็ว มีอยู่สองแพลตฟอร์มหลักที่ถูกพูดถึงมากที่สุด คือ Ethereum และ Solana

ทั้งสองต่างก็มีข้อดี-ข้อเสียต่างกัน แล้วใครกันแน่ที่จะกลายเป็น “ราชาแห่ง DeFi” ในอนาคต?

Ethereum 👑: ราชาแห่ง Smart Contract Ethereum คือ ต้นกำเนิดของ DeFi และเป็นแพลตฟอร์มแรกที่เปิดให้สร้าง Smart Contract ได้แบบอิสระ หลายโครงการระดับโลกอย่าง Uniswap, Aave, MakerDAO ล้วนเริ่มต้นบน Ethereum

ข้อดีของ Ethereum ✅ ความน่าเชื่อถือสูง – เปิดให้บริการมาตั้งแต่ปี 2015 และไม่เคยถูกแฮกที่ระดับโปรโตคอล ✅ ระบบนิเวศเข้มแข็ง – มีนักพัฒนามากที่สุดในวงการบล็อกเชน ✅ รองรับ Layer 2 – เช่น Arbitrum, Optimism ช่วยเพิ่มความเร็วและลดค่าธรรมเนียม

ข้อเสียของ Ethereum ⚠️ ค่าธรรมเนียมแพง – ช่วงที่คนใช้งานเยอะ ค่าธรรมเนียม (Gas Fee) อาจพุ่งถึงหลักร้อยบาทต่อธุรกรรม ⚠️ ความเร็วช้า – ธุรกรรมใน Layer 1 ยังช้ากว่า Solana อยู่มาก

Solana 🚀: ตัวเต็งความเร็วสูง Solana เปิดตัวในปี 2020 โดยมุ่งเน้นการแก้ปัญหาเรื่องความเร็วและค่าธรรมเนียมของ Ethereum เป็นที่นิยมในกลุ่ม NFT และเริ่มบุกตลาด DeFi อย่างต่อเนื่อง

ข้อดีของ Solana ✅ เร็วมาก – ประมวลผลได้หลายพันธุรกรรมต่อวินาที (TPS) ✅ ค่าธรรมเนียมถูก – ธุรกรรมส่วนใหญ่จ่ายไม่ถึง 1 บาท ✅ UX ดีสำหรับผู้ใช้ทั่วไป – แอปบน Solana ใช้ง่ายและเร็วทันใจ

ข้อเสียของ Solana ⚠️ เคยล่มหลายครั้ง – ระบบเคยหยุดทำงานในช่วงที่มีการใช้งานสูง ⚠️ ยังใหม่กว่า Ethereum – Ecosystem ยังเติบโตไม่เท่า Ethereum

ใครจะชนะในโลก DeFi? คำตอบอาจไม่ใช่ “แพลตฟอร์มเดียว” แต่เป็น การอยู่ร่วมกัน แบบ “Multi-Chain World” แต่ถ้ามองเฉพาะ DeFi ล้วน ๆ…

🔹 Ethereum ยังเป็นเบอร์หนึ่งเรื่องความน่าเชื่อถือและมูลค่าที่ล็อกไว้ในระบบ (TVL) 🔹 Solana กำลังมาแรงในหมู่นักพัฒนาและผู้ใช้งานรายย่อย เพราะถูก เร็ว และมีประสบการณ์ใช้งานที่ดี

@ f57bac88:6045161e

مقدمه\ کتاب پول درهم‌شکسته نوشته لین الدن، یکی از برجسته‌ترین آثار در زمینه اقتصاد و فناوری مالی است که در تابستان ۱۴۰۲ (۲۰۲۳ میلادی) منتشر شد. این کتاب با نگاهی عمیق به ریشه‌های پول، کاستی‌های نظام مالی کنونی و ظرفیت‌های فناوری‌های نوین مانند بیت‌کوین، خوانندگان را به سفری فکری دعوت می‌کند. الدن با زبانی روان و دیدگاهی چندجانبه، پیچیدگی‌های پول را به شکلی ساده اما پرمغز توضیح می‌دهد و به ما کمک می‌کند تا درک بهتری از چیستی پول، نقش آن در زندگی و آینده‌اش به دست آوریم. این اثر ۵۳۸ صفحه‌ای، با ساختاری جامع، گذشته، حال و آینده پول را در شش بخش اصلی بررسی می‌کند.

بخش اول: گذشته پول – از دفترهای قدیمی تا بانکداری نوین\ الدن داستان تکامل پول را در دو بخش ابتدایی کتاب روایت می‌کند. او پول را به‌عنوان یک «دفتر حسابداری» معرفی می‌کند که از ابتدا برای ثبت بدهی‌ها و طلب‌ها در جوامع به کار می‌رفت. بخش اول به بررسی پول‌های کالایی مانند صدف و فلزات گران‌بها و ویژگی‌های ایده‌آل پول می‌پردازد. بخش دوم به ظهور خدمات بانکی اولیه و بانکداری گسترده اختصاص دارد و نشان می‌دهد که چگونه فناوری‌هایی مانند تلگراف در قرن نوزدهم تراکنش‌ها را سریع‌تر کردند. اما این پیشرفت‌ها، به گفته الدن، با متمرکز شدن کنترل پول در دست بانک‌های مرکزی، اغلب به زیان مردم عادی تمام شدند و شکاف طبقاتی را عمیق‌تر کردند.

بخش دوم: حال پول – چرا سیستم مالی کنونی شکسته است؟\ در دو بخش بعدی، الدن به نقد نظام مالی کنونی می‌پردازد که بر پایه پول بی‌پشتوانه (فیات) بنا شده است. او استدلال می‌کند که این سیستم با مشکلاتی مانند تورم مداوم، نابرابری اقتصادی و سلطه بیش‌ازحد نهادهای مالی دست‌به‌گریبان است. بخش سوم به نظام مالی جهانی از اوایل قرن بیستم، از جمله نظام برتون وودز، می‌پردازد. بخش چهارم خلق پول مدرن و تأثیرات بدهی‌های بی‌ثبات‌کننده را تحلیل می‌کند. الدن معتقد است که پول بی‌پشتوانه به‌گونه‌ای طراحی شده که ارزش آن به‌مرور کاهش می‌یابد و ثروت را از جیب مردم عادی به‌سوی بانک‌ها و شرکت‌های بزرگ هدایت می‌کند. او با مثال‌هایی واقعی، مانند بحران اقتصادی لبنان در سال ۱۴۰۱ (۲۰۲۲) یا تورم افسارگسیخته در کشورهایی مانند ترکیه، آرژانتین و ایران، نشان می‌دهد که این مشکلات چگونه زندگی میلیون‌ها نفر را تحت تأثیر قرار داده‌اند.

بخش سوم: آینده پول – نقش نوآوری‌های دیجیتال\ در دو بخش پایانی، الدن به بررسی فناوری‌های نوین مالی، به‌ویژه بیت‌کوین و بلاک‌چین، می‌پردازد. بخش پنجم به نوآوری‌های دیجیتال قرن بیست‌ویکم، مانند بیت‌کوین، اختصاص دارد که الدن آن را یک دفتر حسابداری غیرمتمرکز می‌بیند. این فناوری می‌تواند قدرت را از نهادهای مرکزی خارج کرده و به افراد بازگرداند. بخش ششم به اخلاقیات پول و نقش رمزنگاری در شبکه‌های مالی می‌پردازد و آینده‌ای را تصور می‌کند که در آن افراد کنترل بیشتری بر دارایی‌های خود دارند. بااین‌حال، الدن به چالش‌های بیت‌کوین، مانند نوسانات شدید قیمت، مصرف بالای انرژی و مشکلات مقیاس‌پذیری، نیز اشاره می‌کند. او همچنین به نمونه‌هایی از استفاده بیت‌کوین در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه، مانند السالوادور، اشاره دارد که این ارز به‌عنوان ابزاری برای دور زدن محدودیت‌های مالی به کار گرفته شده است.

نقاط قوت کتاب\ ۱. سادگی در عین عمق: الدن مفاهیم پیچیده‌ای مانند تورم، نظام بانکی و بلاک‌چین را با زبانی قابل‌فهم برای همگان توضیح می‌دهد، بدون آنکه از دقت علمی کاسته شود.\ ۲. دیدگاه چندرشته‌ای: او با ترکیب دانش مهندسی و تحلیل مالی، پول را به‌عنوان یک فناوری بررسی می‌کند که با پیشرفت‌های بشری تکامل می‌یابد.\ ۳. تمرکز بر انسان‌ها: کتاب تنها به آمار و ارقام بسنده نمی‌کند؛ الدن نشان می‌دهد که نقص‌های نظام مالی چگونه زندگی واقعی مردم را تحت تأثیر قرار داده است.\ ۴. بی‌طرفی نسبی: اگرچه الدن از طرف‌داران بیت‌کوین است، تلاش می‌کند با بررسی جنبه‌های مثبت و منفی هر سیستم، از یک‌جانبه‌گرایی پرهیز کند.

نقاط ضعف کتاب\ ۱. تمرکز بیش‌ازحد بر بیت‌کوین: برخی معتقدند که الدن بیش‌ازحد به بیت‌کوین خوش‌بین است و به دیگر فناوری‌های مالی نوین، مانند اتریوم یا استیبل‌کوین‌ها، کمتر پرداخته است.\ ۲. پیچیدگی برای تازه‌کارها: هرچند کتاب برای مخاطب عام نوشته شده، برخی بخش‌ها ممکن است برای افرادی که هیچ آشنایی با اقتصاد یا ارزهای دیجیتال ندارند، دشوار باشد.\ ۳. کمبود راه‌حل‌های عملی: الدن در شناسایی مشکلات موفق است، اما راه‌حل‌های پیشنهادی او گاهی کلی و غیرملموس به نظر می‌رسند.

چرا این کتاب را بخوانیم؟\ پول درهم‌شکسته برای هرکسی که می‌خواهد بداند پول چیست، چرا ارزشش تغییر می‌کند و آینده‌اش چه خواهد شد، یک راهنمای بی‌نظیر است. این کتاب به ما کمک می‌کند تا به چیزهایی که بدیهی می‌پنداریم—مانند اسکناسی که هر روز خرج می‌کنیم—عمیق‌تر نگاه کنیم. برای خوانندگان ایرانی، که سال‌هاست با تورم، کاهش ارزش پول ملی و تحریم‌های مالی دست‌وپنجه نرم می‌کنند، این کتاب پاسخ‌هایی روشنگر به سؤال‌هایی مانند «چرا پول ما بی‌ارزش می‌شود؟» یا «آیا راهی برای محافظت از دارایی‌ها وجود دارد؟» ارائه می‌دهد. ساختار شش‌بخشی کتاب، با پوشش جامع گذشته، حال و آینده، خواننده را به درک کاملی از پول و قدرت آن هدایت می‌کند.

جمع‌بندی\ پول درهم‌شکسته بیش از یک کتاب اقتصادی است؛ دعوتی است به تأمل و تغییر. لین الدن با دانش، دقت و نگاهی انسانی، ما را به سفری از گذشته پول تا آینده‌اش می‌برد و نشان می‌دهد که چگونه می‌توانیم با آگاهی و انتخاب‌های درست، به‌سوی سیستمی عادلانه‌تر حرکت کنیم. این کتاب برای هرکسی که به اقتصاد، فناوری یا عدالت اجتماعی علاقه‌مند است، اثری ضروری و الهام‌بخش به شمار می‌رود.

منابع و دسترسی به ترجمه\ بخش‌هایی از این کتاب به فارسی ترجمه شده و از طریق کانال‌های تلگرامی مانند «ترجمه‌ی مقاله‌های بیت‌کوین» در دسترس است. برای یافتن ترجمه، می‌توانید عبارت «پول درهم‌شکسته» یا نام نویسنده را در این کانال جستجو کنید. همچنین، پیشنهاد می‌شود برای ادامه این مسیر و فرهنگ از مترجم و مدیر کانال ترجمه مقالات حمایت مالی کنید