@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

The book "Softwar: A Novel Theory on Power Projection and the National Strategic Significance of Bitcoin" by Jason P. Lowery offers an extensive exploration of Bitcoin through the lens of strategic and cybersecurity, as opposed to a purely fiscal one. It presents a novel theoretical paradigm for assessing the potential strategic national implications of Bitcoin, viewed as an electro-cyber defense technology as opposed to a decentralized electronic cash system.

The following are some pivotal arguments and possible inaccuracies from the standpoint of a Bitcoin developer:

Proof-of-work

The proposition that Bitcoin, via its proof-of-work protocol, can be perceived as an electro-cyber security framework allowing for the exertion of tangible power in the digital domain. Lowery posits that Bitcoin equips individuals with the capacity to enforce severe physical consequences (represented in wattage) on adversarial entities attempting to exploit them via software. This viewpoint conceptualizes Bitcoin as a mechanism for power projection, enabling individuals to establish and maintain an untrusting, permissionless, egalitarian, and decentralized dominion over bits of information, provided they have the will and capability to wield physical power to safeguard it (Page 245).

• The critique here, though, points out that this is an intriguing perspective; the primary purpose of Bitcoin is to operate as a decentralized digital currency. The power projection elucidated by the author is an ancillary outcome of Bitcoin's decentralization and inherent security, rather than its primary intent. The function of Bitcoin's proof-of-work algorithm is to fortify the network against double-spending and other forms of attack, not to project power in a geopolitical context.

• The book also proposes that Bitcoin could upheave human power-based dominance hierarchies from their foundational roots (Page 374). While it's undeniable that Bitcoin has the potential to disrupt conventional financial systems and power structures, it was not designed to be an instrument for power projection in the same way that military or economic resources are. Bitcoin is a tool for financial sovereignty and privacy, not a weapon for geopolitical power struggles.

• The book seems to equate the physical power utilized in Bitcoin's proof-of-work algorithm (i.e., the energy expended to mine Bitcoin) with the notion of power projection in a geopolitical environment. While it's true that Bitcoin mining demands substantial energy resources, it is distinctly different from the concept of power projection, which usually involves employing military or economic force to influence the actions and behavior of other nations.

Bits and Value

The book asserts that the bits within Bitcoin can symbolize any kind of valuable data that individuals desire it to represent, including but not confined to financial information (Page 375). It further implies that once we have deduced how to keep financial bits of data physically secure against attack, we have in essence figured out how to protect all types of information from physical attack (Page 34).

• While it is indeed factual that Bitcoin's blockchain can be employed to store and transmit non-financial data, it's crucial to understand that this is not its primary function. Bitcoin was developed as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, with the primary objective of facilitating financial transactions without necessitating a trusted third party. The data that Bitcoin primarily processes is transaction data, i.e., detailing who transferred how much Bitcoin to whom.

• The capability to store non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain is more of an unintended consequence of its design rather than a fundamental feature. This is accomplished by utilizing specific fields in the transaction data to store arbitrary data, but this practice is generally discouraged because it can result in blockchain bloat. The Bitcoin blockchain is not intended to function as a general-purpose data storage system, and employing it as such can induce inefficiencies.

• Storing non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain does not offer any additional security advantages over storing financial data. The security of the Bitcoin blockchain is derived from its decentralized, proof-of-work consensus mechanism, which ensures that no single entity can control or manipulate the transaction history. This security extends equally to all data housed on the blockchain, whether it's financial or non-financial.

Strangler Pattern

The book suggests that Bitcoin could serve as a "strangler pattern" replacement of our legacy internet infrastructure with a modern architecture that isn’t as clearly susceptible to systemic exploitation and abuse (Page 376). The book further intimates that Bitcoin could operate as the preeminent mechanism employed by digital-age societies to map or anchor elements of the old internet version to the revamped version of the internet (Page 322).

• While Bitcoin indeed introduces a new, decentralized paradigm for financial transactions and data storage, it isn't designed to supplant the entire internet infrastructure. The internet is an extensive and multifaceted system supporting a wide variety of applications and services, from email and web browsing to video streaming and cloud computing. In contrast, Bitcoin is a specific application that operates on the internet, designed to enable peer-to-peer financial transactions.

• The claim made by the book appears to conflate the concept of a decentralized financial system (which Bitcoin offers) with the idea of a decentralized internet (which is a much broader and more intricate concept). While there are projects and technologies aiming to foster a more decentralized internet (such as InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) and various blockchain-based "Web 3.0" initiatives), Bitcoin is not one of them.

• The book's suggestion that Bitcoin could serve as the dominant mechanism for tying the legacy internet to a new version of the internet is speculative and isn't substantiated by current technological realities. While it's true that blockchain technology (the underlying technology of Bitcoin) has potential applications in areas like decentralized identity systems and domain name systems, these are still largely experimental and have not been widely adopted yet.

Kinetic Power

The book propososes that Bitcoin could significantly transform the way humans vie for control over valued resources, effectively resetting the global balance of power in a manner akin to the profound changes brought about by full-scale kinetic world wars (Page 376). The author further proposes that Bitcoin could revolutionize the perception of physical confrontation in the digital-age society (Page 370). Moreover, it's implied that global adoption of an electro-cyber form of physical power competition, facilitated by proof-of-work technologies like Bitcoin, could lead to the genesis of a completely novel form of polity (Page 385).

• It is undeniable that Bitcoin holds the potential to disrupt conventional financial systems and power structures. However, juxtaposing its impact to the scale and consequences of world wars is hyperbolic and speculative. World wars resulted in massive loss of human lives, extensive destruction, and substantial shifts in geopolitical boundaries and power structures. In contrast, Bitcoin is a digital currency that operates on a decentralized network. While it can indeed influence financial systems and potentially disrupt some power structures, particularly those related to finance and banking, it is incapable of causing physical destruction or loss of life.

• The book suggests that Bitcoin could spawn a completely new form of polity is speculative and isn't supported by current realities. Although Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can indeed influence how people transact and store value, they don't intrinsically alter the fundamental nature of societal organization or governance. They may contribute to shifts in power dynamics, particularly in the financial sector, but they do not supplant the need for traditional forms of governance and societal organization.

• The book also seems to conflate the concept of power competition in a geopolitical context with the concept of power competition in the context of Bitcoin mining. Bitcoin mining does involve a form of competition, as miners compete to solve complex mathematical problems to add new blocks to the blockchain and receive Bitcoin rewards. However, this is far from the concept of power competition in a geopolitical context, which involves nations competing for resources, influence, and dominance on the global stage.

Projecting Power

The book asserts that Bitcoin, through its proof-of-work technology, could help society secure itself against systemic exploitation of computer networks (Page 378). The author argues that Bitcoin could empower individuals to physically secure their digital information, by projecting physical power in, from, and through cyberspace to impose severe physical costs on those who exploit our computing systems (Page 347). The author further speculates that national adoption of Bitcoin could be conceptualized as the employment of an electro-cyber militia to safeguard and defend a nation’s valuable digital information (Page 360).

• While it's true that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can provide a level of security and privacy not available in traditional financial systems, it's crucial to underscore that they also introduce new vulnerabilities and potential for misuse. Bitcoin transactions are irreversible, which can make them appealing for fraudulent activities. Bitcoin wallets can be lost or stolen if not adequately secured. The security of the Bitcoin network itself hinges on its decentralized nature and the computational power required to alter the blockchain, but individual users are still susceptible to scams and hacking.

• The book's suggestion that Bitcoin could serve as a form of "electro-cyber militia" is speculative and not universally accepted within the Bitcoin community. Although Bitcoin does offer a method for individuals to secure their financial transactions against interference from third parties, it is not designed to shield against all forms of cyber exploitation or to serve as a form of national defense.

• In conclusion, Softwar presents an unconventional viewpoint on Bitcoin's potential influence on national strategic security, proffering that Bitcoin could serve as an effective tool for power projection, system defense, and even societal reorganization. However, these propositions, while intriguing, often veer towards the speculative and seem to be somewhat misaligned with the predominant understanding of Bitcoin's primary purpose and functionality within the field of computer science.

• While this book undoubtedly offers a unique and thought-provoking perspective on Bitcoin's wider implications, it is crucial to approach these theories with a discerning and critical eye. It is always beneficial to juxtapose such theories with the broader consensus within the Bitcoin development and computer science communities, to gain a more rounded understanding of this remarkable technology. Ultimately, Bitcoin continues to evolve and its full potential, while yet to be fully realized, remains a subject of intense debate and exploration within the computer science community.

@ bcea2b98:7ccef3c9

Nym's review of Software:

The book "Softwar: A Novel Theory on Power Projection and the National Strategic Significance of Bitcoin" by Jason P. Lowery offers an extensive exploration of Bitcoin through the lens of strategic and cybersecurity, as opposed to a purely fiscal one. It presents a novel theoretical paradigm for assessing the potential strategic national implications of Bitcoin, viewed as an electro-cyber defense technology as opposed to a decentralized electronic cash system.

The following are some pivotal arguments and possible inaccuracies from the standpoint of a Bitcoin developer:

1. The proposition that Bitcoin, via its proof-of-work protocol, can be perceived as an electro-cyber security framework allowing for the exertion of tangible power in the digital domain. Lowery posits that Bitcoin equips individuals with the capacity to enforce severe physical consequences (represented in wattage) on adversarial entities attempting to exploit them via software. This viewpoint conceptualizes Bitcoin as a mechanism for power projection, enabling individuals to establish and maintain an untrusting, permissionless, egalitarian, and decentralized dominion over bits of information, provided they have the will and capability to wield physical power to safeguard it (Page 245).

The critique here, though, points out that this is an intriguing perspective; the primary purpose of Bitcoin is to operate as a decentralized digital currency. The power projection elucidated by the author is an ancillary outcome of Bitcoin's decentralization and inherent security, rather than its primary intent. The function of Bitcoin's proof-of-work algorithm is to fortify the network against double-spending and other forms of attack, not to project power in a geopolitical context.

The book also proposes that Bitcoin could upheave human power-based dominance hierarchies from their foundational roots (Page 374). While it's undeniable that Bitcoin has the potential to disrupt conventional financial systems and power structures, it was not designed to be an instrument for power projection in the same way that military or economic resources are. Bitcoin is a tool for financial sovereignty and privacy, not a weapon for geopolitical power struggles.

The book seems to equate the physical power utilized in Bitcoin's proof-of-work algorithm (i.e., the energy expended to mine Bitcoin) with the notion of power projection in a geopolitical environment. While it's true that Bitcoin mining demands substantial energy resources, it is distinctly different from the concept of power projection, which usually involves employing military or economic force to influence the actions and behavior of other nations.

1. The book asserts that the bits within Bitcoin can symbolize any kind of valuable data that individuals desire it to represent, including but not confined to financial information (Page 375). It further implies that once we have deduced how to keep financial bits of data physically secure against attack, we have in essence figured out how to protect all types of information from physical attack (Page 34).

While it is indeed factual that Bitcoin's blockchain can be employed to store and transmit non-financial data, it's crucial to understand that this is not its primary function. Bitcoin was developed as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, with the primary objective of facilitating financial transactions without necessitating a trusted third party. The data that Bitcoin primarily processes is transaction data, i.e., detailing who transferred how much Bitcoin to whom.

The capability to store non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain is more of an unintended consequence of its design rather than a fundamental feature. This is accomplished by utilizing specific fields in the transaction data to store arbitrary data, but this practice is generally discouraged because it can result in blockchain bloat. The Bitcoin blockchain is not intended to function as a general-purpose data storage system, and employing it as such can induce inefficiencies.

Storing non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain does not offer any additional security advantages over storing financial data. The security of the Bitcoin blockchain is derived from its decentralized, proof-of-work consensus mechanism, which ensures that no single entity can control or manipulate the transaction history. This security extends equally to all data housed on the blockchain, whether it's financial or non-financial.

1. The book suggests that Bitcoin could serve as a "strangler pattern" replacement of our legacy internet infrastructure with a modern architecture that isn’t as clearly susceptible to systemic exploitation and abuse (Page 376). The book further intimates that Bitcoin could operate as the preeminent mechanism employed by digital-age societies to map or anchor elements of the old internet version to the revamped version of the internet (Page 322).

While Bitcoin indeed introduces a new, decentralized paradigm for financial transactions and data storage, it isn't designed to supplant the entire internet infrastructure. The internet is an extensive and multifaceted system supporting a wide variety of applications and services, from email and web browsing to video streaming and cloud computing. In contrast, Bitcoin is a specific application that operates on the internet, designed to enable peer-to-peer financial transactions.

The claim made by the book appears to conflate the concept of a decentralized financial system (which Bitcoin offers) with the idea of a decentralized internet (which is a much broader and more intricate concept). While there are projects and technologies aiming to foster a more decentralized internet (such as InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) and various blockchain-based "Web 3.0" initiatives), Bitcoin is not one of them.

Additionally, the book's suggestion that Bitcoin could serve as the dominant mechanism for tying the legacy internet to a new version of the internet is speculative and isn't substantiated by current technological realities. While it's true that blockchain technology (the underlying technology of Bitcoin) has potential applications in areas like decentralized identity systems and domain name systems, these are still largely experimental and have not been widely adopted yet.

1. The book propososes that Bitcoin could significantly transform the way humans vie for control over valued resources, effectively resetting the global balance of power in a manner akin to the profound changes brought about by full-scale kinetic world wars (Page 376). The author further proposes that Bitcoin could revolutionize the perception of physical confrontation in the digital-age society (Page 370). Moreover, it's implied that global adoption of an electro-cyber form of physical power competition, facilitated by proof-of-work technologies like Bitcoin, could lead to the genesis of a completely novel form of polity (Page 385).

It is undeniable that Bitcoin holds the potential to disrupt conventional financial systems and power structures. However, juxtaposing its impact to the scale and consequences of world wars is hyperbolic and speculative. World wars resulted in massive loss of human lives, extensive destruction, and substantial shifts in geopolitical boundaries and power structures. In contrast, Bitcoin is a digital currency that operates on a decentralized network. While it can indeed influence financial systems and potentially disrupt some power structures, particularly those related to finance and banking, it is incapable of causing physical destruction or loss of life.

The book suggests that Bitcoin could spawn a completely new form of polity is speculative and isn't supported by current realities. Although Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can indeed influence how people transact and store value, they don't intrinsically alter the fundamental nature of societal organization or governance. They may contribute to shifts in power dynamics, particularly in the financial sector, but they do not supplant the need for traditional forms of governance and societal organization.

The book also seems to conflate the concept of power competition in a geopolitical context with the concept of power competition in the context of Bitcoin mining. Bitcoin mining does involve a form of competition, as miners compete to solve complex mathematical problems to add new blocks to the blockchain and receive Bitcoin rewards. However, this is far from the concept of power competition in a geopolitical context, which involves nations competing for resources, influence, and dominance on the global stage.

1. The book asserts that Bitcoin, through its proof-of-work technology, could help society secure itself against systemic exploitation of computer networks (Page 378). The author argues that Bitcoin could empower individuals to physically secure their digital information, by projecting physical power in, from, and through cyberspace to impose severe physical costs on those who exploit our computing systems (Page 347). The author further speculates that national adoption of Bitcoin could be conceptualized as the employment of an electro-cyber militia to safeguard and defend a nation’s valuable digital information (Page 360).

While it's true that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies can provide a level of security and privacy not available in traditional financial systems, it's crucial to underscore that they also introduce new vulnerabilities and potential for misuse. Bitcoin transactions are irreversible, which can make them appealing for fraudulent activities. Bitcoin wallets can be lost or stolen if not adequately secured. The security of the Bitcoin network itself hinges on its decentralized nature and the computational power required to alter the blockchain, but individual users are still susceptible to scams and hacking.

The book's suggestion that Bitcoin could serve as a form of "electro-cyber militia" is speculative and not universally accepted within the Bitcoin community. Although Bitcoin does offer a method for individuals to secure their financial transactions against interference from third parties, it is not designed to shield against all forms of cyber exploitation or to serve as a form of national defense.

In conclusion, Softwar presents an unconventional viewpoint on Bitcoin's potential influence on national strategic security, proffering that Bitcoin could serve as an effective tool for power projection, system defense, and even societal reorganization. However, these propositions, while intriguing, often veer towards the speculative and seem to be somewhat misaligned with the predominant understanding of Bitcoin's primary purpose and functionality within the field of computer science.

While this book undoubtedly offers a unique and thought-provoking perspective on Bitcoin's wider implications, it is crucial to approach these theories with a discerning and critical eye. It is always beneficial to juxtapose such theories with the broader consensus within the Bitcoin development and computer science communities, to gain a more rounded understanding of this remarkable technology. Ultimately, Bitcoin continues to evolve and its full potential, while yet to be fully realized, remains a subject of intense debate and exploration within the computer science community.

@ 9e915942:f8133dec

I find myself spending more and more time on nostr, a decentralized social networking protocol. Here’s why.

The problem (as if you didn't already know)

I’ve long been frustrated with social media platforms. They have the same incentives - increase time on site - primarily because of the ad model for revenue.

This model incentivizes them to collect as much data as possible about their users.

It incentivizes them to develop algorithms that drive “engagement,” which just means clicks and attention.

It incentivizes tribalism.

It incentivizes binary thinking (us/them, black/white, with us or against us, etc.).

To increase followers and reach, users are incentivized to play into the algorithm, creating a positive feedback loop - outrageous posts amplified by the algo incentivizes similar posts.

Social media companies can use the algorithm to promote perspectives they support and down rank perspectives they disagree with.

Governments and intelligence agencies are increasingly pressuring social media companies to do their bidding.

CEOs of these companies have an incredible amount of power to control speech, as we’re seeing with Elon.

I could go on. My point is that we need something different. Something that is built around different incentives. Something that makes it difficult to censor speech and users simply because they have an unpopular viewpoint. Something that a government or CEO can't simply turn off.

Enter nostr

Nostr appears to fix many of these things at the protocol level. (To understand this, consider email. Email is built on a protocol. Countless “clients” can leverage this protocol. I can use Gmail, you can use Yahoo mail, and we can still communicate with each other. The same is true for Nostr, except not only can we still communicate using different clients, we can use our username with any client. It would be like getting sick of Gmail and switching to Yahoo mail, but all of your emails come with you.)

Nostr also allows for a “value for value” incentive model, thanks to the bitcoin lightning network integration. Instead of users trying to optimize their posts to suit the algorithm, they can be rewarded directly for quality content.

Imagine a Twitter or Facebook experience in which you can send micropayments directly to a user for a quality post.

They generate value for you, so you directly compensate them accordingly. Value for value, cutting out the need for the advertising model.

Maybe you only send a few pennies, but maybe that's all the user would get from an ad being seen. But this process fundamentally changes the revenue model, cutting out the advertising in the middle.

Maybe nostr won’t work. Maybe it won’t be able to scale. Maybe value for value won't turn out to be a powerful enough incentive model. Maybe we won’t be able o break the network effects of the current platforms. I can think of numerous ways in which Nostr could potentially fail.

But I’m tired of being stuck in perverse incentive hell.

Confronted by the uncertainty of the future and the clearly negative direction so many things are trending, I am going to do what I can to participate in and build the world I want to inhabit. The world I want my kids to live in.

This is why I Bitcoin. This is why I Moral Courage. This is why poured my guts into designing an elective called Critical Thinking. And now, this is why I Nostr.

I want social media. The world needs social media. But I can’t in good conscience continue to participate on these platforms when there may (finally) be an alternative that fixes the incentives.

I’m not deleting my accounts (yet). But I’ll be spending less time on them.

I’ve been on Nostr since early January. If you want help trying it out, let me know. There’s great info about getting started on Nostr here.

The client I use on iOS is Damus.

On the web I use Primal.

Follow me: z_cress@nostrverified.com or npub1n6g4js374378t90rrh4jyeqaqf537ce0qygu79u4r5mgf7qn8hkqk3watk

This post originally appeared on blogstack.io, a nostr client similar to Medium.

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

小城，最好還是老城，便有趣而且有味，宜逛，亦宜居。

Bilbao畢爾巴鄂，西班牙北方的珠玉小城，剛巧，便是如此的佳美之地，富裕安詳，亦古亦新，一派與世無爭的鬆和糯，人稱西班牙的小瑞士。

小城的清晨，三步一間五步再一間，小小的咖啡舖和麵包房，7:30就熱氣騰騰紛紛開門，堪比上海延慶路口的大餅油條舖。煮咖啡給你、遞新鮮麵包給你的，大多是精神抖擻朝氣蓬勃的老阿姨老爺叔。這一點，比京都優秀得多，京都基本上十點半以前，只有星巴克麥當勞會理你。

晨起步去老城，食早餐。Bilbao是14世紀古城，600年歷史，不算很長，狠是狠在一切宛然都在，600年歷歷在目地在那裡，這就夠你歎為觀止，一邊散步一邊啊啊啊不絕如縷了。

古城的廣場，宏闊堅實，此地當年的不可一世，可以想見。廊道裡密密麻麻開著一圈小館子，坐下吃咖啡，再吃兩件清早剛剛做起來的點心Pintxo，彷彿香港人清早茶樓裡的一盅兩件，小館子裡亦備有三四種免費報紙，供你以古老的方式瞭解國內外大事小事。坐在晨光裡，與600年同在，滋味是很厚很不錯的。

左右隔桌的食客，皆是本地人，不太有遊客。兩位老婦人，一對老閨蜜，一個食甜奶油麵包，一個食火腿奶酪麵包，姐妹們食得涇渭分明，身材倒是沒有很大的差距，正常的老婦人的微胖樣子。食甜奶油麵包的老婦人，剖開麵包，拿餐刀刮走一半甜奶油，只食剩下的一半甜奶油。坐輪椅的老人亦常見，自己一個人默默駕駛著萬能的輪椅，來吃咖啡喂鴿子會老朋友。

食飽早餐，晃晃老城。麻煩的是，城中百年老店比比皆是，要是每一間百年老店都推門進去看一眼，那簡直是要寸步難行的了。

包子帶我去看一間手工做傘的百年老店，立在街角，很小一個舖子。進門，是鋪天蓋地的傘，每一柄傘，皆婷婷玉立，漂亮得如同一襲華美的旗袍。我像個鄉下人，立在店堂裡長吁短嘆。

女主人請我們母子去後面的作坊白相，年深日久的工作台上，累累的歲月痕跡，包漿燦然，無語沉默。滿牆的工具，以及桌面上一厚摞古典音樂唱片。女主人打開一柄又一柄傘，講給我們聽，傘骨是碳纖維的，所以很輕。碳纖維的自行車我見過，碳纖維的傘，我是第一次見識到。百年老店的時髦，超出了我的想像。問女主人，這麼美的傘面，是哪裡來的呢？女主人講，義大利來的，專門的設計師設計的。怪不得品味高華得讓人尖叫。女主人講了很多傘的小知識給我們聽，比如，各種場合用各種不同的傘；比如，一柄好傘，講究是講究在哪些細節裡。然後憂心忡忡了一下，你說，今後的天氣，會不會雨越下越少、傘越來越不需要了？我趕緊安慰她，不會不會，我剛從梅雨淋漓的上海來，你可以去上海開分店。女主人另一個憂心，是她的兩個兒子，都沒有學做傘。你有一個兒子，我有兩個，可惜兩個都沒有學家族手藝，一個兒子在交響樂團拉琴，另一個在做社會工作。怪不得工作台上一大摞的古典音樂唱片。這個舖子，傳了三代人了，現在，政府也在幫忙找繼承人。

如此一柄傘，售價大約在600元人民幣左右。

  一個清晨，吃了一盅兩件、看了百年老店、學了一堆傘知識。赴一座小城，需要很多的光陰，以及很好的腳力。

小城Bilbao的七月，正午攝氏二十四度的涼爽，日落遲至夜晚八九點的長日永晝。

這個就是巴斯克人的little darling，早餐和午後點心的人見人愛，小甜奶油麵包，像上海人的甜大餅

以上圖片來自下面這本書

下面是Bilbao老城百年傘舖的照片

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfjx5ur2wpeqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c8mrqrm
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvf4x5ervd33qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823cdqaveh
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfcxscnqd3nqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823czmjr4k
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjv33xqunjwphqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c0ggymy
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exq6nxdfkxv6rqdp5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c42u6cr
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exq6nxdfexqerzdejqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823cawzeyh

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

徽菜品粹，於巨鹿路899號，那個洋樓林立的著名大院子裡，靜靜開一間新館子，治盧州菜。

盧州菜是徽菜五個支脈裡的一支，以合肥菜為底子，格局是徽菜裡的官府菜，文人氣息濃厚，滋味柔淡一點徽菜的沖，亦不淪陷到南人的軟甜無度裡，獨標一幟，非常別致。

上海吃客有福，於舊租界的維多利亞小樓裡，得以領略醬香富饒、回味深厚的盧州菜。如果被當代文豪、名優們頻頻寫入日記筆記裡，再過幾十年翻翻故紙，恐怕大有我們如今翻閱魯迅日記、梁實秋小品、張愛玲散文以及馬連良回憶錄的情狀，口水洶湧氾濫。

禪衣素方，以腐衣交疊壓制，成方磚塊，點鮮椒醬與XO醬，於馥郁豆香裡，層疊醬香，一方入口，十分滿足。

徽菜代表作，除了刀板香，還有錢串，以五花肉融醬料醃製、風乾、熏烤，一路古法手段，瘦者不老，肥者不膩，是徽人過年必備，曬製時候形狀彷彿銅錢，所以討個口彩，錢串。

品粹的招牌之一，肥西老母雞湯，每次上桌都顛倒眾生不已，無非雞好、山泉水好，足火三個小時的耐心。說說是容易的，每次都好到食客驚艷，背後自然是無窮的精控。做一天好人好事不難，難的是做一輩子好人好事。每次飲到品粹的絕色雞湯，都在心裡致敬不已。

紅燒菜，中國人都是愛不釋手的，海外華人思鄉最慘烈，也是這一口紅燒。以前讀小澤征爾的自傳，寫他早年離開日本，遠赴歐美學藝術，窮哈哈的留學生，最渴望的，是家裡郵寄一點梅子乾和味噌來。中國人思念醬油湯淘飯，日本人思念味噌湯，都是胃裡的酸鹼度在作怪。

回來說紅燒，紅燒菜裡的天花板，是紅燒甲魚大概沒有人會反對。品粹的紅燒甲魚，真是輝煌之作，甲魚選得上乘，紅燒燒得正確。食剩的甲魚湯汁，回鍋炒個飯，涓滴不浪費，多好。

李鴻章大雜燴，是打遍天下很能打的名菜，華洋通吃，人見人愛，全世界唐人街廣受歡迎的名餚。品粹治得精，參、鮑、菌熔於一燴，十分過癮，堪稱徽版佛跳牆。

將軍菜乾燉紅燒肉，根底是盧州菜裡的官府扣肉，將軍菜是安徽一味山野菜，炸過之後，與五花豬肉一起，瓦罐慢燉三個鐘，上桌顫顫抖抖，腴美無匹，饞煞老饕。

這些年，一些上海食客並不熟悉的菜系，頻頻在我城響亮起來，台州菜是一種，徽菜也是其一。這些菜系的蓬勃，跟默默深耕的領軍人物有莫大的關係。品粹徽菜的主理人陳政師傅，多年尋訪徽州各地，熟透支支脈脈，每季都有精彩菜單，十分了得。

品粹這家新店，品粹近安，有滋有味於巨鹿路。

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

西班牙北部的巴斯克自治區的首府，vitoria gasteiz，今天是傳統節日，萬人空巷，感人肺腑。

滿街是穿著傳統節日服飾的巴斯克男女，小朋友們都是從頭打扮到腳。

包子跟我說，《黃帝內經》上講的，美其食，任其服，樂其俗，此時此刻都齊了。

850年歷史的古都，1813年威靈頓公爵曾經在此擊潰了拿破崙，這個雕塑，就是在紀念這宗偉業。

古都的摩登，也歷歷可見。

這些攝人心魄的雄偉氣概，圖片難以言喻，身臨其境，滋味完全不同。

如今，此地是一個人口不過20多萬的小城。    

從Bilbao坐車過去，50分鐘車程，一路風景如畫，青山蒼翠欲滴，牧場綿延如歌。沒有堵車，沒有氣喘吁吁的貨櫃大車成陣。晚上八點離開Vitoria，回到家剛好九點，天邊還有一抹彤雲未退盡，感慨萬千的古都一日。                                                                                  

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfjx5ur2wpeqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c8mrqrm
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvf4x5ervd33qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823cdqaveh
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfcxscnqd3nqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823czmjr4k
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjv33xqunjwphqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c0ggymy
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exq6nxdfkxv6rqdp5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c42u6cr

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

傍晚散步去Bilbao的美術館，一棟嚴整清俊的老房子，離家七、八分鐘的步程，每天開到晚上八點，這個時間表，非常西班牙。     入門氣概非凡，空間奢侈，通體白色大理石的台階，華美無比。廳堂內種種雕塑，星辰散落，水平實在是高，無論是雕塑本身，還是陳列手段，都高度舒服。

Bilbao街頭，雕塑比比皆是，隨便捏捏，都是活龍活現深入靈魂的佳品，這個東西，實在是玩不過人家。

一間展廳裡，有西班牙名畫家Joaquin Sorolla 的幾幅作品，非常眩目，光影出神入化，深得印象派真傳，旁邊幾幅素描小稿，了了幾筆，隨便搨搨，神得不得了，一舉看呆過去。

孤陋寡聞，第一次看見這位畫家的作品，回家一邊吃晚飯，一邊猛烈學習。

1863年至1923年的西班牙畫家，活了六十歲，非常多產，存世有2000件作品。兩歲時候父母染霍亂雙亡，被姨夫收留扶養長大，姨夫是鎖匠，跟美術毫無淵源。這位Sorolla是在巴黎學藝成功，學得印象派精髓，一路順風順水，他的作品曾經在美國十分熱賣，至今收藏他作品最多的，除了馬德里的Sorolla美術館，就是美國的兩間博物館，聖路易斯和芝加哥。

這幅《母親》，太贊了。畫家藝高膽大，下筆雋永，太厲害。

下面這幅是他非常拿手的題材，海灘嬉戲，不用說，好得不得了。

再下面一幅，亦好，是他的孩子們。

這兩幅是太太的畫像和自畫像，

再來兩幅。

下次去馬德里，要去看看他的故居做成的美術館。

今晚美術館裡的一件裝置，空靈優雅，靜悄悄，飄在屋裡。

包子回家路上問我，覺得美術館如何，我說很享受。美術館本身的建築非常妥貼，像個美術館的樣子。展品不多，但是很精，特別是佈展空靈，沒有物擠物的緊迫，也沒有人擠人的困苦，如此才是一個像樣美術館的格局。

美術館最珍貴的，不是展品，是氣息。

我們還在堆積展品的階段，拎幾個如雷貫耳的大畫家，就得意非凡大排長隊了，離開談論氣息，還很遠。

再來一幅。

家門口的美術館，晚飯前過去走走看看，惜福。

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfjx5ur2wpeqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c8mrqrm
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvf4x5ervd33qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823cdqaveh
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfcxscnqd3nqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823czmjr4k
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjv33xqunjwphqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c0ggymy

@ 1c52ebc8:5698c92a

This is me testing what habla.news's editor will support in terms of native nostr ideas

NIP 99

Event for random note of mine nostr:nevent1qqsrdthgka83ffupw98jf98xupq0eumsh603793aq8nujyjwh9065acpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcl8ar76

At a user's npub nostr:npub1r3fwhjpx2njy87f9qxmapjn9neutwh7aeww95e03drkfg45cey4qgl7ex2

Apologies for any spam. Checking what this looks like in various clients.

@ f821179b:ed4fd022

Damus is specifically an iOS application, not a web client. As it stands, it's the most favored method for accessing Nostr and beginning your exploration. Damus never ceases to improve, enhancing its application with each successive update. The zaps once coursed freely via Damus, but Apple Inc.'s intervention disrupted this flow, causing a noticable dip in the number of zaps.

Just in case you're not in the know, Apple issued a stern warning to the makers of the popular iOS app 'Damus.' The tech giant threatened to expel the app from their App Store unless the 'zaps' functionality, associated with posted notes, was removed. The rationale provided was vaguely along the lines of 'a requirement for Apple Pay integration.' Consequently, Damus took the requisite steps, adjusting the app to ensure its continued availability to the wider audience on the App Store.

t didn't take long for the ingenious minds populating the Nostr community to devise a workaround that didn't "violate" any of Apple's "policies." Hence, ZapplePay was born. This astute website enables users to link their GetAlby wallet to their Nostr accounts, which in turn provides a seamless ability to zap anyone from any Nostr client using their favorite emoji as the trigger. If you're interested in learning more about ZapplePay and how to set it up, take a look at this YEGHRO blog post for a comprehensive, yet easy-to-follow guide.

With that, the flow of zaps is back, reaching new heights. If you're a fan of data and statistics, Nostr.Band is a great resource for a visual take on what's going on in the Nostr network. Just hit their 'Stats' tab.

The brilliant minds behind Nostr have thus far tackled every obstacle thrown their way. I, for one, am curious and eager to see what challenge they will conquer next.

Stay calm and Zap on.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Discover the truth about Bitcoin's future: Will it soar to new heights or face a devastating downfall? Uncover the numbers that reveal the potential of the Bull Run or the possibility of a bust.

Table Of Content

• Bitcoin's Past Successes and Failures: An Overview
• Factors Influencing Bitcoin's Future
• Conclusion
• FAQ

Bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency, has taken the financial world by storm. Its volatility and potential for massive gains have captivated investors and enthusiasts alike. However, as with any investment, there are always questions surrounding its future. Is Bitcoin heading for another bull run, or is it on the verge of a catastrophic bust? In this article, we will delve into the numbers and trends to shed light on the potential future of Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Future Bitcoin's Past Successes and Failures: An Overview

To understand Bitcoin's future, it's essential to examine its past. Bitcoin's journey has been marked by tremendous highs and devastating lows, making it a rollercoaster ride for investors. Let's take a closer look at its historical performance.

The Early Years: Bitcoin's Humble Beginnings

In 2009, Bitcoin emerged as a concept, and its initial value was next to nothing. However, over time, its popularity grew, and by 2010, it gained some value. In May 2010, a historic moment occurred when Laszlo Hanyecz famously purchased two pizzas for 10,000 Bitcoins. Little did anyone know that those Bitcoins would be worth millions in the future.

The 2017 Bull Run: Bitcoin's Rise to Prominence

The year 2017 witnessed an unprecedented surge in Bitcoin's value, attracting global attention. Bitcoin's price skyrocketed from around $1,000 in January to nearly $20,000 in December. This massive growth sparked a frenzy among investors, leading to widespread adoption and media coverage.

The 2018 Bubble Burst: Bitcoin's Steep Decline

However, the euphoria didn't last long. In 2018, the cryptocurrency market experienced a significant crash, with Bitcoin's value plummeting to around $3,000 by the end of the year. This sharp decline shook investors' confidence and raised doubts about the long-term viability of Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Future Factors Influencing Bitcoin's Future

Bitcoin's future is shaped by various factors that impact its price, adoption, and overall market sentiment. Understanding these factors is crucial for predicting its future trajectory.

Market Adoption and Regulatory Developments

The widespread adoption of Bitcoin by businesses and individuals significantly impacts its value. As more companies accept Bitcoin as a form of payment and governments establish favorable regulatory frameworks, Bitcoin's future looks promising. However, regulatory challenges and negative news can hinder its growth.

Technological Advancements and Innovation

Bitcoin's future is intrinsically linked to technological advancements and innovation within the cryptocurrency space. The development of scaling solutions, improved security measures, and enhanced user experience can propel Bitcoin to new heights.

Global Economic Conditions

Bitcoin's value is closely tied to global economic conditions. During times of economic uncertainty, such as political instability or inflationary pressures, Bitcoin often emerges as a safe haven asset. Conversely, stable economic conditions may dampen its growth potential.

Investor Sentiment and Speculation

The speculative nature of Bitcoin makes investor sentiment a significant driver of its price fluctuations. Positive news, endorsements from influential figures, or large-scale institutional investments can fuel optimism and trigger a bull run. On the other hand, negative sentiment can lead to a bearish market.

Bitcoin Future

Conclusion

While predicting Bitcoin's future with absolute certainty is impossible, analyzing historical trends and considering various factors can provide valuable insights. Bitcoin's path has been filled with remarkable highs and gut-wrenching lows, making it an intriguing investment option. As always, investors should exercise caution, diversify their portfolios, and stay updated with the latest developments in the cryptocurrency space.

FAQ

Is investing in Bitcoin still profitable?

While Bitcoin has experienced significant price volatility, many investors have made substantial profits.

What caused the 2018 Bitcoin crash?

The 2018 Bitcoin crash was influenced by a combination of factors, including regulatory uncertainties, a decline in market sentiment, and the bursting of the speculative bubble that had formed in the previous year.

Can Bitcoin replace traditional currencies?

Bitcoin's potential to replace traditional currencies remains a subject of debate. While it offers benefits such as decentralization and borderless transactions, challenges related to scalability, regulatory hurdles, and public acceptance need to be overcome.

What role do institutional investors play in Bitcoin's future?

Institutional investors, such as hedge funds and asset management firms, have started to show interest in Bitcoin. Their participation can bring stability, liquidity, and increased mainstream adoption, positively impacting Bitcoin's future.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

Twitter: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

En horas de la madrugada de este 27 de julio, un incendio de grandes proporciones destruyó el complejo turístico estatal Pio Cua en Jagüey Grande, Matanzas. Según una nota publicada por la Asamblea Municipal del Poder Popular en ese territorio, el origen de las llamas fue una sobrecarga eléctrica, aunque peritos del Ministerio del Interior (Minint) investigan a fondo lo sucedido.

“Las fuerzas especializadas del Minint de conjunto con las máximas autoridades del municipio y los trabajadores de la institución, lograron controlar el incendio, sin daños a vidas humanas”, afirma la nota, pero los percances a la infraestructura fueron irreversibles.

En redes sociales circulan múltiples videos que muestran las llamas devorando la estructura de madera y el techo de guano de la discoteca, el restaurante y la cafetería, locales que integraban el complejo turístico.

El restaurante Pio Cua, ubicado en el kilómetro 4 de la carretera a Playa Larga, tenía una capacidad para 200 personas y estaba especializado en comida internacional. Según el portal del ciudadano de Matanzas, “la construcción de madera garantizaba un ambiente agradable con una cómoda terraza ambientada con plantas naturales ideal para un descanso”.

La falla eléctrica se produjo al restablecerse la energía eléctrica luego de un largo apagón. Al parecer, los equipos electrónicos no tenían protección y a través de ellos comenzó a extenderse el fuego.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

El cubano Osvel Pérez Mantilla se llevó una inesperada respuesta al presentar una petición de asilo en Luisiana, donde estuvo dos años detenido por ingresar de manera irregular a Estados Unidos.

“En Cuba no hay dictadura”, expresó el juez a cargo de su caso, quien finalmente le negó la protección entregándole la orden de deportación final conocida como I-220B. A un par de años de esta situación, Pérez Mantilla vive en Miami con el miedo de ser repatriado tras reanudarse los vuelos de este tipo.

Al compartir su caso al periodista Mario J. Pentón, el antillano expresó que teme ser detenido cuando se presente a las oficinas del Servicio de Control de Inmigración y Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés) para renovar su permiso de estadía en EEUU.

“Llevo días sin dormir, pensando en lo que podría pasar con mi esposa y la vida que he hecho en este país”, agregó, al señalar que ha ejercido dos trabajos en territorio estadounidense para poder salir adelante.

Asimismo, sostuvo: “me voy a presentar a las oficinas y espero que no me vaya a suceder lo peor, no quiero que me suceda y me lleven a la dictadura, esto me está afectando mucho en lo personal”.

La orden de deportación final se entrega a personas que perdieron sus casos ante un juez, cuando defendieron su solicitud de asilo u otras aplicaciones que presentaron para permanecer en EEUU.

En las últimas semanas, decenas de cubanos con ese documento terminaron detenidos cuando asistieron a las sedes del ICE para dar cumplimiento a citas de rutina. Algunos fueron liberados, pero sin tener una permanencia segura en el país.

Desde el mes de abril, la administración de Joe Biden ha realizado cuatro vuelos de deportación hacia la Mayor de las Antillas. Estos trayectos permanecieron suspendidos a causa de la pandemia y se reanudaron tras un acuerdo migratorio entre Washington y La Habana.

En el último viaje iba un cubano identificado como Sergio Pérez, quien dejó en EEUU a su hijo de 10 años. La madre de este menor reside en Cuba, mientras que en Miami se encuentran dos tías, quienes no tienen la custodia legal.

Al menos unas 258 personas oriundas de la Isla han sido devueltas por medio de los vuelos de repatriación. Todos estos migrantes ingresaron por la frontera con México o navegaron en embarcaciones improvisadas hasta Florida. Luego de ser procesados, se les permitió permanecer en EEUU, pero con dicha orden.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

El subsecretario de Seguridad Nacional, Blas Nuñez-Neto, ofreció una conferencia de prensa sobre la marcha del programa de parole humanitario que la administración demócrata de Joe Biden mantiene en vigor para cubanos, nicaragüenses, haitianos y venezolanos.

Una de las preguntas que recibió de parte de periodistas invitados fue ¿por qué el gobierno de EEUU admite en el programa parole a represores y funcionarios vinculados a los regímenes totalitarios de Cuba, Nicaragua y Venezuela?

De acuerdo con Blas Nuñez-Neto, las aplicaciones para la visa humanitaria que examina el Servicio de Ciudadanía e Inmigración (USCIS) y la Oficina de Aduanas y Protección Fronteriza (CBP) pasan por filtros del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional. Cada candidato a ser beneficiados con el parole es buscado en las bases de datos de Seguridad Nacional y Seguridad Pública y si están en los récord no se dejan entrar, confirmó el subsecretario en un audio difundido por el periodista cubano Mario J. Pentón.

Luego la respuesta a la pregunta es evidente: si los represores no están en las bases de datos, que son como especie de “listas negras”, no habrá razones para impedir su entrada a EEUU por medio del parole humanitario, que es en la actualidad la vía más expedita para emigrar legalmente a territorio estadounidense.

Los regímenes totalitarios de Cuba, Nicaragua y Venezuela se caracterizan por contar con un gran entramado de represores y funcionarios que por unas prebendas sirven de vasallos de sus propios compatriotas. En el caso cubano han surgido muchas historias de este tipo de personajes, que en aunque en pequeña escala, se cansaron de reprimir a los vecinos de su cuadra y su barrio. Ellos también hacen mucho daño y contribuyen a que el sistema comunista siga en pie; sin embargo, nunca están circulados en las listas negras de EEUU.

En cambio, el Departamento de Estado suele colocar en esas bases de datos a altos cargos militares cubanos que nunca por su posición dentro de la cúpula de poder de Cuba van a solicitar una visa humanitaria. Sin embargo, sus familiares sí salen conferencia de la Isla para mantener y controlar los múltiples negocios que tienen en el extranjero.

De momento, con las herramientas que hay para otorgar el parole humanitario no es de extrañar que sigan entrando a EEUU represores, castristas, funcionarios del Partido Comunista y demás personas asociadas al régimen. ¿Usted que propondría para solucionar este problema?

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

El gobierno de Estados Unidos confirmó la deportación acelerada hacia México de alrededor de 4.000 migrantes cubanos, nicaragüense, venezolanos y haitianos tras intento de cruzar la frontera desde que se puso fin al Título 42, según informó el periodista Mario J. Pentón.

De acuerdo con declaraciones de Blas Nuñez-Neto, subsecretario de Seguridad Nacional estadounidense, desde el 12 de mayo a la fecha con la colaboración de las autoridades mexicanas, EEUU ha expulsado a 85.000 migrantes de 115 países que intentaron cruzar sin autorización la frontera sur del país.

Todos los expulsados se van con una prohibición de participar en vías legales de migración a EEUU durante los próximos cinco años. Además, si son reincidentes en cruces ilegales, pueden ser enjuiciados judicialmente.

Según el Nuñez-Neto, la política migratoria de la administración de Joe Biden ha funcionado, pues los registros muestran una evidente caída en los encuentros de migrantes que tienen las autoridades fronterizas. El subsecretario insistió en que la frontera de EEUU no están ni estarán abiertas a la migración ilegal.

Además del parole humanitario, los ciudadanos de Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela y Haití que se sientan con la posibilidad de pedir asilo en EEUU, lo pueden hacer ante un oficial de Aduanas y Protección Fronteriza (CBP, por sus siglas en inglés) en la frontera.

Sin embargo, esa entrevista debe ser planificada por medio de la aplicación CBP One que ofrece 1.450 citas al día a lo largo de ocho puntos de control distribuidos en los más de 3.000 kilómetros de línea divisoria entre México y EEUU.

Hasta el 23 de junio, CBP One había atendido a más de 49.000 ciudadanos extranjeros en los puertos de entrada y se les dio el derecho a presentar su caso de asilo, según los criterios de admisibilidad que estipula el Título 8 de la ley migratoria que sustituyó al Título 42.

Solo los migrantes que se encuentren en el centro o norte de México pueden entrar a la aplicación CBP One para agendar su cita siguiendo un proceso de solo dos pasos que ha sido simplificado. Por ejemplo, pueden solicitar citas en cualquier momento durante un período de 23 horas y, si se les asigna una cita, tendrán 23 horas adicionales para confirmarla.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Después de que Rusia inaugurara en enero de 2022 un observatorio astronómico adjunto al Instituto de Geofísica y Astronomía (IGA) de La Habana, nuevos proyectos en esa dirección acaban de ser anunciados por la prensa de Moscú.

De acuerdo con el sitio oficial Sputnik, entidades de ambos países prevén la instalación de otros dos telescopios rusos en la Isla: uno de 25 centímetros y otro de un metro de diámetro, este último reflector, "que contribuirían a la observación de objetos más débiles" que planetas y estrellas, precisa la nota.

Según un amplio reporte desde La Habana, el observatorio del IGA será trasladado en el futuro al Valle de Picadura, ubicado al sur de Canasí, casi en los límites entre Mayabeque y Matanzas, zona "provista de condiciones de cielo oscuro y pocas precipitaciones, en comparación con otras regiones del país", comenta Antonio Alonso, ingeniero en Telecomunicaciones y especialista del instituto cubano.

El reporte no menciona que esa ubicación coloca al observatorio justo frente a la península de Florida, donde existen objetivos militares claves de EEUU, como el Comando Sur.

Los expertos cubanos califican estas instalaciones como "prioridades dentro de la colaboración bilateral" ruso-cubana, ahora que los lazos estratégicos se estrechan.

De acuerdo con Sputnik, desde la nueva ubicación del observatorio los expertos rusos valoran la posibilidad de hacer estudios de fuentes radioastronómicas y de otra índole, sin precisar cuáles.

Asimismo, agrega el reporte, el observatorio posee una estación para el registro de las condiciones meteorológicas y un sistema de recepción de satélites de posicionamiento global ruso GLONASS.

"Si tenemos en cuenta la distancia entre esta estación receptora y las ubicadas en Rusia, podemos concretar numerosos estudios, desde el aumento de la precisión de este sistema hasta la percepción sobre movimientos de la corteza terrestre", asegura Alonso.

El observatorio cuenta con un astrógrafo, tipo de telescopio utilizado para tomar fotos astronómicas, que es uno de los dispositivos aportados por Rusia mediante convenios firmados con los institutos de Astronomía Aplicada (IPA) y de Astronomía (INASAN), ambos de la Academia de Ciencias de Rusia, además de financiados por Moscú.

Ese telescopio permite la obtención de imágenes de gran campo que abarcan una numerosa cantidad de objetos, si bien el trabajo hasta la fecha radica fundamentalmente en la observación de estrellas variables de rotación rápida y de asteroides, asegura el reporte.

En sus declaraciones, Alonso reconoce que los astrónomos cubanos "mantienen continua comunicación con los expertos rusos, durante las visitas que ellos realizan" a la Isla, "para el impulso de proyectos conjuntos asociados a la investigación de los objetos astronómicos luminosos".

"La posibilidad de colaboración es amplia y diversa. Esto es la primera vez que se hace en Cuba. Transitamos de instrumentos bastante antiguos hasta esta posibilidad de incorporar tecnología moderna. El telescopio está equipado con un carrusel de filtros fotométrico que favorece la obtención de imágenes del fondo del cielo en distintos rangos de frecuencias luminosas", especifica.

De igual manera, subraya el ingeniero, el telescopio cuenta con una cámara CCD de 4096 x 4096 píxeles, acondicionada para la reducción del ruido térmico y el registro de imágenes muy débiles, y una montura automatizada que contribuye a su orientación precisa y al rastreo del movimiento sideral de las estrellas, como consecuencia de la rotación de la Tierra. Las fotografías obtenidas en este proceso poseen una alta calidad.

El reporte de Sputnik asegura que la colaboración internacional en el IGA se extiende además a la cooperación con el Instituto de Geofísica de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), para el estudio de la ionosfera, campo magnético, clima espacial y paleomagnetismo; intercambios con el Instituto de Hidráulica de Cantabria, en España, en el campo de las afectaciones como consecuencia del cambio climático; así como proyectos con los países de la Comunidad del Caribe (CARICOM); y con el Instituto del Ambiente de Estocolmo, en Suecia, para temas de agua y saneamiento, bioeconomía y economía circular.

Pero llama la atención un elemento presuntamente menor en el reporte: según el medio ruso, existe un memorándum de entendimiento con China, que está interesada en la instalación en Cuba de un telescopio propio, así como del sistema de posicionamiento por satélite BeiDou, que complementaría el trabajo del GLONASS ruso ya operativo en la Isla.

El BeiDou está operativo desde 2020 y otorga cobertura global a China con su propio sistema de navegación, el BDS, lo que le permite, al igual que Rusia con el GLONASS, o Europa, con el Galileo, obtener independencia del Sistema de Posicionamiento Global, o GPS, de EEUU.

Con 30 satélites en órbita y una inversión de 10.000 millones de dólares, el BDS promete una mejor y más precisa cobertura de navegación global que el GPS, según Pekín. Su diseño original estuvo a cargo del Ejército del gigante asiático.

El proyecto de emplazar estas tecnologías chinas en Cuba se da a conocer poco después del intercambio de acusaciones entre Washington, Pekín y La Habana acerca de la existencia desde hace varios años de un centro de espionaje chino en una base militar al sur de la capital cubana y de planes para montar un centro de entrenamiento militar en la Isla.

No obstante, el observatorio astronómico ruso que ya funciona en Cuba parece todo menos un centro de espionaje. Ello, si se obvia que a su inauguración en 2022 asistió, según la propia prensa oficial cubana, Vitaly Grechukha, quien estuvo registrado en la dirección de la sede central de la Inteligencia Militar (GRU) antes de ir a Cuba, donde trabaja en la Embajada de Rusia bajo la cobertura de secretario de la sede diplomática.

Grechukha, parte de una red de decenas de agentes del GRU y del Servicio de Inteligencia Exterior (SVR) del Kremlin que operan desde Cuba un centro de espionaje que habría servido a Moscú para dar seguimiento a las operaciones de vigilancia sobre EEUU que hasta hace dos décadas hacía la base de espionaje de Lourdes, fue mencionado en un amplio reportaje sobre esa trama de espías denunciada por The Insider, revista especializada en periodismo de investigación, verificación de hechos y análisis político con sede en Riga, Letonia.

Además de operativos del GRU y el SVR, en La Habana estarían expertos rusos en ciencia de cohetes, tecnología informática y matemáticas, todos transferidos en secreto a Cuba para ¿usar tecnología de espionaje y ubicación de objetivos de interés militar en EEUU?

Si bien el centro de espionaje de Lourdes, que entre 1967 y 2001 estuvo ubicado en la zona donde hoy funciona la Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas (UCI), en las afuera de La Habana, dejó de estar operativo en su forma original, ¿qué mejor tapadera para ejecutar operaciones de espionaje que un observatorio astronómico?

The Insider recordó en su reporte que al menos desde 2014 existen rumores de que la estación de espionaje rusa en Cuba habría sido reactivada, ahora con menos visibilidad y un equipo de menores dimensiones.

Si a todo lo anterior se suma la entrada al escenario de un actor como China, el régimen de Cuba podría estar brindando su territorio para operaciones demasiado sensibles para el vecino del norte. Ello, mientras su sociedad civil permanece ajena a lo que se cuece entre bambalinas.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Ángel Cuenca, histórico dirigente independentista y soberanista de Islas Canarias, falleció en Santiago de Cuba hace casi dos semanas y su cuerpo aún no ha podido ser enviado a España, denunciaron sus familiares a la prensa del archipiélago.

De acuerdo con el diario El Día, de Tenerife, el hermano del fallecido, el arqueólogo Julio Cuenca, aseguró que el deceso del activista ocurrió en Santiago de Cuba el 16 de julio a causa de un infarto, pero la familia en Canarias no fue avisada sino nueve días después, el martes 25.

Según el familiar, la comunicación entre Cuba y la familia en España ha corrido a cargo de la Embajada de Madrid en La Habana, pero el cadáver permanece en la morgue del Hospital Clínico de Santiago de Cuba.

"Santiago está medio paralizado, porque es fiesta nacional por la conmemoración del asalto a Moncada", explicó Julio Cuenca.

"En el momento del fallecimiento estaba solo, aunque tenía su documentación", añadió.

Según el hermano del fallecido, el activista canario pasó los últimos años entre Puerto Rico, Venezuela y Cuba, aunque era en el último país donde permanecía más tiempo "porque allí se sentía muy cómodo". Asimismo, el fallecido tenía una casa en La Habana.

"No tenemos todos los datos del protocolo que hay que cumplir. Todo se está haciendo a través de la Embajada de España", insistió Cuenca.

De acuerdo con El Día, el activista fallecido, que además era músico, estaba en Santiago de Cuba como asistente a la edición 42 del Festival del Caribe, y pensaba asistir a los actos oficiales del régimen cubano por el aniversario 70 del asalto al Cuartel Moncada, organizado por Fidel Castro.

Ingeniero agrónomo de profesión, Ángel Cuenca apenas ejerció el oficio, pues desde joven intervino en movimientos y organizaciones históricas vinculadas al independentismo y soberanismo canario, como el Congreso Nacional de Canarias (CNC), Frepic Awañak, de Tenerife, o Siete Estrellas Verdes.

Además, asesoró al expresidente del Gobierno canario Lorenzo Olarte en una iniciativa para que Canarias adquiriese el estatus de Estado Libre Asociado, lo que le llevó a estar afiliado al Centro Canario Nacionalista (CCN).

En las elecciones autonómicas del pasado 28 de mayo en España encabezó la lista del movimiento Reunir Canarias al Parlamento de esa región autónoma española, pero apenas obtuvo votos para su candidatura.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Un juez de inmigración de Florida decidió que el destacado activista del exilio cubano en EEUU Ramón Saúl Sánchez, dirigente de la organización Movimiento Democracia, no será deportado a Cuba.

El exiliado, quien lleva refugiado en Estados Unidos desde 1967, podrá permanecer en ese país bajo el amparo de la Convención de Ginebra contra la Tortura, a la que, según sus abogados, se acogería en caso de que las autoridades insistan en enviarlo de regreso a la Isla.

Asimismo, según el reporte de Telemundo 51, el opositor al régimen cubano podrá además solicitar su residencia permanente.

La Habana acusa a Sánchez de terrorismo, algo que él niega tajantemente. El régimen de la Isla lo ha acusado por organizar las denominadas Flotillas de la libertad, caravanas de barcos que han navegado hasta el límite de las aguas internacionales con las de Cuba para solidarizarse con los cubanos de la Isla y exigir la libertad del país.

De acuerdo con el exiliado, quien podría haber llegado al final de un largo proceso legal ante las autoridades migratorias, su situación tiene por origen las presiones de la dictadura cubana.

"Ya tengo orden de deportación", había dicho Sánchez, de 65 años. Posteriormente, indicó que esa orden no podía ser ejecutada hasta que un juez diera la autorización.

La defensa de Sánchez argumentó, indicó el reporte, que este llegó a Estados Unidos como refugiado político en 1967 en los llamados Vuelos de la libertad y que corre peligro de ser torturado en su país si es devuelto.

También reiteró su petición de residencia en EEUU, que dos veces le ha sido denegada.

Una petición en la plataforma Change.org denominada "Por favor, ayúdenos a parar la deportación de Ramón Saúl Sánchez" cuenta con más de 20.000 firmas, que serían enviadas al Gobierno de Joe Biden para que interceda en el caso.

La activista Vanessa Alonso, promotora de la campaña, indica en la introducción de la petición que "si el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos lo envía de regreso a Cuba, finalmente pasará el resto de su vida en una prisión cubana".

"Ramón Saúl Sánchez es una persona muy respetada. Un orgullo de la comunidad cubana, que continúa luchando por la libertad y la democracia de Cuba. Llegó a nuestro país en 1967 y ha defendido los derechos humanos en nombre del pueblo cubano durante más de cinco décadas", subraya.

@ 92294577:49af776d

Privacy and security go hand in hand, as complementary and user-valued properties for Bitcoin. At Blockstream, we have been at the forefront of developing a range of methods to improve privacy for Bitcoin users, from wallet best practices in Green and Jade to developing MuSig2 and Confidential Transactions (CT).

Fully unlinkable transactions, capable of shielding both the amount and transaction graph, have become increasingly of interest since Bitcoin’s inception. While cryptocurrencies like Monero and ZCash have achieved enhanced privacy with ring signatures and SNARKs, neither has enabled full anonymity with support for multiple asset types. Before full anonymity can be taken up, a crucial step lies in the advancement of Bulletproofs++ (BP++). This improvement aims to enhance the efficiency of confidential transactions while preserving its current multi-asset support without the need for a trusted setup.

Bulletproofs++ is a new, more efficient discrete log-based signature execution system, enabling us to improve the space efficiency of confidential transactions. Confidential transactions enable users to retain the privacy of their transaction amount, ensuring that the net flow of funds in a transaction is zero. To prevent secret inflation and “negative” outflow, confidential transaction protocols use range proofs to prove that each output amount falls within a positive range.

Early Privacy Preserving Protocols: Confidential Transactions

The current CT protocol deployed on Liquid uses Borromean Ring signatures for range proofs and Confidential Assets to support multiple asset types. This is one of the earliest deployed privacy preserving transaction protocols, and traces its roots directly to Greg Maxwell’s earliest work on zero-knowledge proofs and Bitcoin. Since then, zero-knowledge proofs have experienced an unprecedented level of development. Blockstream continues to play an active role in the broader zero-knowledge proof research ecosystem, in particular in the development of Bulletproofs (BP). BP was a landmark construction as it was the first to achieve concretely small proof sizes without a trusted setup.

Bulletproofs++: Compactness and Efficiency Improvement

The ability to store, transact and verify transactions cheaply is essential for any blockchain application. Naturally, we want any proof system used for private transactions to be as small and efficient to verify as possible, to limit the amount of data stored on the blockchain. BP++’s 64-bit range proof size is only 416 bytes, which is 39% smaller than BP and 10 times smaller than current Liquid range proofs. The reduced proof sizes would reduce the transaction fees and node storage requirements. On a regular commodity laptop, verification and proving of BP++ range proofs are about four times faster than BP, making BP++ more efficient for blockchain verification. Each BP++ range proof is about the size of seven Schnorr signatures and can be verified in the time it takes to verify 20 Schnorr signatures. Through BP++, we will bring all the improvements of BP and these additional improvements to Liquid.

In current Liquid CTs and BPs range proofs, we prove a value lies in a range by proving knowledge of the bits of the value. For example, to prove a value lies in [0, 2^64 -1] we would prove knowledge of 64 bits. Bulletproofs++ allows us to use larger bases, which reduces the number of digits we need to represent a number. For example, a value in [0, 2^64 - 1] can be represented using only 16 hex digits, a 4x reduction compared to bits. This is made possible using a novel technique called the reciprocal argument, which can implement a lookup argument. The reciprocal argument when instantiated as lookup is also known as the log derivative lookup argument.

Multiple Asset Support and The Reciprocal Argument

The reciprocal argument is a technique used within the Bulletproofs++ protocol to enable support for multiple assets in the same transaction. It essentially allows different types of tokens to participate in the transaction while keeping the types of all inputs and outputs private. The idea can be explained by using an analogy of a table inside a zero-knowledge proof.

We can think of the reciprocal argument as a way to use a table inside a zero-knowledge proof; given an index and an amount we can add or subtract that amount from the table at that index. Each input and each output of a transaction has a type and an amount. To check that all the amounts of each type balance, we will go through each input and add the amount to the table at the index given by the type. Then, we will go through each output and remove the amount from the table at the index given by its type. The transaction balances only if all the entries of the table are zero.

In pseudo code:

```

Start with empty table

T = {}

Add all the inputs

for (v, t) in I: T[t] += v

Remove all the outputs

for (v, t) in O: T[t] -= v

Check all the amounts in the table are zero

for (t, v) = T.items(): assert(v == 0) ```

A Bulletproofs++ Implementation

Currently, we have merged the first of two PRs into libsecp256k1zkp implementing the norm argument. This builds on BP’s inner product argument and is the underlying primitive that gives BP++ their small size. Next, we'll merge the second PR that supports range proofs. After that, we will implement support for multiple assets and the necessary proofs to privately migrate existing assets to the BP++ asset format. Implementing in libsecp256k1zkp allows us to take advantage of the state-of-the-art performance of libsecp and easily deploy on Liquid.

Longer term, using the new flexibility of BP++ and some research directions at Blockstream, we see a path to robustly private transactions on Liquid, and potentially Bitcoin, which can also provide unlinkability between transactions and shield amounts (and shield types of assets in Liquid).

Unlinkable transaction protocols are at the cutting edge of zero-knowledge proof research, especially when implemented without a trusted setup. BP++ will form the confidential core of a multi-asset, unlinkable transaction protocol for Liquid.

In addition to the CT core, which will use the techniques developed in BP++, unlinkable transactions require proving much more complex statements. This area is still under active research.

Privacy has always been an important part of the Bitcoin ethos; money requires fungibility and fungibility requires privacy. Our goal is to bring this privacy to the Bitcoin ecosystem, with BP++ as the first step. Targeting Simplicity for an implementation of BP++ will allow any project that supports Simplicity to integrate and interoperate with BP++.

To learn more, read the latest version of the “Bulletproofs++: Next Generation Confidential Transactions via Reciprocal Set Membership Arguments” paper, currently hosted and freely available on the IACR eprint archive, and review our work-in-progress implementation on GitHub.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

*Whales and Sharks: The Big Players in the Crypto Ocean

*June's Close: A Bullish Signal

*Data-Driven Predictions: The Role of Crypto Intelligence

*Whale Holdings: Keeping the Selling Pressure at Bay

*Historical Trends: July as a Profitable Month

*Conclusion

*FAQ

The cryptocurrency market is a dynamic and rapidly evolving space, with Bitcoin (BTC) at its forefront. One of the key factors influencing the market's trajectory is the activity of large-scale investors, often referred to as 'whales' and 'sharks.' These entities hold substantial volumes of digital assets, and their investment decisions can significantly sway market trends. Recently, these influential players have been doubling down on their Bitcoin investments, particularly as June 2023 drew to a close with BTC valued at an impressive $30,469. This article aims to explore this trend in detail, examining the potential implications for Bitcoin's future and the broader cryptocurrency market.

Whales and Sharks: The Big Players in the Crypto Ocean

In the vast and diverse ocean of cryptocurrencies, whales and sharks are the entities that hold large volumes of digital assets. Their actions, whether buying or selling, often have a substantial impact on the market, influencing price trends and investor sentiment. Over the past seven weeks, these large wallet investors have shown a strong appetite for Bitcoin, accumulating an impressive 154,500 BTC. The pace of this accumulation has notably picked up in the last two weeks. These investors have been capitalizing on market dips to increase their holdings, a strategy often referred to as 'buying the dip.' This trend suggests a strong confidence in Bitcoin's potential and could have significant implications for its future price trajectory.

June's Close: A Bullish Signal

June 2023 proved to be a significant month for Bitcoin, with the cryptocurrency closing at $30,469. This figure represents the highest monthly close for Bitcoin in the past thirteen months, a noteworthy milestone given the asset's volatility. This bullish signal has sparked optimism among investors and analysts alike, fueling a thesis for a potential recovery and upward trend for Bitcoin in the coming months. If this prediction holds true, it could mark a turning point for Bitcoin, potentially leading to increased investor interest and further price appreciation.

Data-Driven Predictions: The Role of Crypto Intelligence

In the complex and often opaque world of cryptocurrencies, crypto intelligence platforms like Santiment play a crucial role. These platforms track and analyze market trends, providing valuable insights into the behavior of large-scale investors and the overall market dynamics. According to Santiment's data, Bitcoin's whale and shark addresses accumulated a staggering 154,500 BTC within a seven-week period between April 2023 and the time of writing. The acceleration of Bitcoin accumulation in the past two weeks suggests a strong confidence in the asset's potential for recovery. This data-driven insight provides a valuable perspective on the market sentiment and could be a key indicator of Bitcoin's future performance.

Whale Holdings: Keeping the Selling Pressure at Bay

One of the intriguing aspects of the Bitcoin market is the concentration of holdings among whales. Bitcoin whale wallets, those holding between 10 and 10,000 tokens, now control 67% of the total supply of the asset. This concentration of holdings can be seen as a positive sign for Bitcoin. By holding onto a significant portion of the supply, whales reduce the selling pressure on the asset. This can create a more stable environment for price growth, as it reduces the likelihood of sudden price drops due to large-scale sell-offs. This dynamic could increase the potential for a recovery in Bitcoin's price and contribute to its long-term stability.

Historical Trends: July as a Profitable Month

Historical trends can often provide valuable insights into potential future market trends. For Bitcoin, the month of July has consistently proven to be profitable for holders over the last three years. This trend, coupled with the recent surge in whale accumulation, suggests that Bitcoin's price may recover from recent market fluctuations. These include the impact of the SEC's crackdown on crypto exchanges and increased regulatory scrutiny. If this trend continues, July could once again prove to be a profitable month for Bitcoin investors, potentially marking the start of a new upward trend.

Conclusion

The recent actions of Bitcoin whales and sharks, coupled with historical trends and market data, paint a promising picture for Bitcoin's future. The significant accumulation of BTC, the highest monthly close in over a year, and the potential for a profitable July all point towards a positive outlook for the asset. However, as with all investments, these trends should not be taken as definitive predictions. Market dynamics are subject to change, and investors should always conduct thorough research and consider various factors before making investment decisions. The world of cryptocurrencies is as exciting as it is unpredictable, and the actions of Bitcoin whales and sharks will continue to be a critical aspect to watch in the unfolding narrative of this digital asset.

FAQ

Who are Bitcoin whales and sharks? Bitcoin whales and sharks are large-scale investors who hold substantial volumes of Bitcoin. Their investment activities can significantly influence market trends.

What has been the recent trend among Bitcoin whales and sharks? Over the past seven weeks, Bitcoin whales and sharks have doubled down on their investments, accumulating 154,500 BTC, especially as June ended with BTC valued at $30,469.

What does June's closing value signify for Bitcoin? June 2023 closed with Bitcoin valued at $30,469, the highest monthly close in the past thirteen months. This has sparked optimism for a potential recovery and upward trend for Bitcoin.

What percentage of Bitcoin's total supply do whale wallets control? Bitcoin whale wallets, those holding between 10 and 10,000 tokens, now control 67% of the total supply of the asset.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

Twitter: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ e6ce6154:275e3444

Este artigo foi censurado pelo estado e fomos obrigados a deletá-lo após ameaça de homens armados virem nos visitar e agredir nossa vida e propriedade.

Isto é mais uma prova que os autoproclamados antirracistas são piores que os racistas.

https://rothbardbrasil.com/pelo-direito-de-ser-racista-fascista-machista-e-homofobico

Segue artigo na íntegra. 👇

Sem dúvida, a escalada autoritária do totalitarismo cultural progressista nos últimos anos tem sido sumariamente deletéria e prejudicial para a liberdade de expressão. Como seria de se esperar, a cada dia que passa o autoritarismo progressista continua a se expandir de maneira irrefreável, prejudicando a liberdade dos indivíduos de formas cada vez mais deploráveis e contundentes.

Com a ascensão da tirania politicamente correta e sua invasão a todos os terrenos culturais, o autoritarismo progressista foi se alastrando e consolidando sua hegemonia em determinados segmentos. Com a eventual eclosão e a expansão da opressiva e despótica cultura do cancelamento — uma progênie inevitável do totalitarismo progressista —, todas as pessoas que manifestam opiniões, crenças ou posicionamentos que não estão alinhados com as pautas universitárias da moda tornam-se um alvo.

Há algumas semanas, vimos a enorme repercussão causada pelo caso envolvendo o jogador profissional de vôlei Maurício Sousa, que foi cancelado pelo simples fato de ter emitido sua opinião pessoal sobre um personagem de história em quadrinhos, Jon Kent, o novo Superman, que é bissexual. Maurício Sousa reprovou a conduta sexual do personagem, o que é um direito pessoal inalienável que ele tem. Ele não é obrigado a gostar ou aprovar a bissexualidade. Como qualquer pessoa, ele tem o direito pleno de criticar tudo aquilo que ele não gosta. No entanto, pelo simples fato de emitir a sua opinião pessoal, Maurício Sousa foi acusado de homofobia e teve seu contrato rescindido, sendo desligado do Minas Tênis Clube.

Lamentavelmente, Maurício Sousa não foi o primeiro e nem será o último indivíduo a sofrer com a opressiva e autoritária cultura do cancelamento. Como uma tirania cultural que está em plena ascensão e usufrui de um amplo apoio do establishment, essa nova forma de totalitarismo cultural colorido e festivo está se impondo de formas e maneiras bastante contundentes em praticamente todas as esferas da sociedade contemporânea. Sua intenção é relegar ao ostracismo todos aqueles que não se curvam ao totalitarismo progressista, criminalizando opiniões e crenças que divergem do culto à libertinagem hedonista pós-moderna. Oculto por trás de todo esse ativismo autoritário, o que temos de fato é uma profunda hostilidade por padrões morais tradicionalistas, cristãos e conservadores.

No entanto, é fundamental entendermos uma questão imperativa, que explica em partes o conflito aqui criado — todos os progressistas contemporâneos são crias oriundas do direito positivo. Por essa razão, eles jamais entenderão de forma pragmática e objetiva conceitos como criminalidade, direitos de propriedade, agressão e liberdade de expressão pela perspectiva do jusnaturalismo, que é manifestamente o direito em seu estado mais puro, correto, ético e equilibrado.

Pela ótica jusnaturalista, uma opinião é uma opinião. Ponto final. E absolutamente ninguém deve ser preso, cancelado, sabotado ou boicotado por expressar uma opinião particular sobre qualquer assunto. Palavras não agridem ninguém, portanto jamais poderiam ser consideradas um crime em si. Apenas deveriam ser tipificados como crimes agressões de caráter objetivo, como roubo, sequestro, fraude, extorsão, estupro e infrações similares, que representam uma ameaça direta à integridade física da vítima, ou que busquem subtrair alguma posse empregando a violência.

Infelizmente, a geração floquinho de neve — terrivelmente histérica, egocêntrica e sensível — fica profundamente ofendida e consternada sempre que alguém defende posicionamentos contrários à religião progressista. Por essa razão, os guerreiros da justiça social sinceramente acreditam que o papai-estado deve censurar todas as opiniões que eles não gostam de ouvir, assim como deve também criar leis para encarcerar todos aqueles que falam ou escrevem coisas que desagradam a militância.

Como a geração floquinho de neve foi criada para acreditar que todas as suas vontades pessoais e disposições ideológicas devem ser sumariamente atendidas pelo papai-estado, eles embarcaram em uma cruzada moral que pretende erradicar todas as coisas que são ofensivas à ideologia progressista; só assim eles poderão deflagrar na Terra o seu tão sonhado paraíso hedonista e igualitário, de inimaginável esplendor e felicidade.

Em virtude do seu comportamento intrinsecamente despótico, autoritário e egocêntrico, acaba sendo inevitável que militantes progressistas problematizem tudo aquilo que os desagrada.

Como são criaturas inúteis destituídas de ocupação real e verdadeiro sentido na vida, sendo oprimidas unicamente na sua própria imaginação, militantes progressistas precisam constantemente inventar novos vilões para serem combatidos.

Partindo dessa perspectiva, é natural para a militância que absolutamente tudo que exista no mundo e que não se enquadra com as regras autoritárias e restritivas da religião progressista seja encarado como um problema. Para a geração floquinho de neve, o capitalismo é um problema. O fascismo é um problema. A iniciativa privada é um problema. O homem branco, tradicionalista, conservador e heterossexual é um problema. A desigualdade é um problema. A liberdade é um problema. Monteiro Lobato é um problema (sim, até mesmo o renomado ícone da literatura brasileira, autor — entre outros títulos — de Urupês, foi vítima da cultura do cancelamento, acusado de ser racista e eugenista).

Para a esquerda, praticamente tudo é um problema. Na mentalidade da militância progressista, tudo é motivo para reclamação. Foi em função desse comportamento histérico, histriônico e infantil que o famoso pensador conservador-libertário americano P. J. O’Rourke afirmou que “o esquerdismo é uma filosofia de pirralhos chorões”. O que é uma verdade absoluta e irrefutável em todos os sentidos.

De fato, todas as filosofias de esquerda de forma geral são idealizações utópicas e infantis de um mundo perfeito. Enquanto o mundo não se transformar naquela colorida e vibrante utopia que é apresentada pela cartilha socialista padrão, militantes continuarão a reclamar contra tudo o que existe no mundo de forma agressiva, visceral e beligerante. Evidentemente, eles não vão fazer absolutamente nada de positivo ou construtivo para que o mundo se transforme no gracioso paraíso que eles tanto desejam ver consolidado, mas eles continuarão a berrar e vociferar muito em sua busca incessante pela utopia, marcando presença em passeatas inúteis ou combatendo o fascismo imaginário nas redes sociais.

Sem dúvida, estamos muito perto de ver leis absurdas e estúpidas sendo implementadas, para agradar a militância da terra colorida do assistencialismo eterno onde nada é escasso e tudo cai do céu. Em breve, você não poderá usar calças pretas, pois elas serão consideradas peças de vestuário excessivamente heterossexuais. Apenas calças amarelas ou coloridas serão permitidas. Você também terá que tingir de cor-de-rosa uma mecha do seu cabelo; pois preservar o seu cabelo na sua cor natural é heteronormativo demais da sua parte, sendo portanto um componente demasiadamente opressor da sociedade.

Você também não poderá ver filmes de guerra ou de ação, apenas comédias românticas, pois certos gêneros de filmes exaltam a violência do patriarcado e isso impede o mundo de se tornar uma graciosa festa colorida de fraternidades universitárias ungidas por pôneis resplandecentes, hedonismo infinito, vadiagem universitária e autogratificação psicodélica, que certamente são elementos indispensáveis para se produzir o paraíso na Terra.

Sabemos perfeitamente, no entanto, que dentre as atitudes “opressivas” que a militância progressista mais se empenha em combater, estão o racismo, o fascismo, o machismo e a homofobia. No entanto, é fundamental entender que ser racista, fascista, machista ou homofóbico não são crimes em si. Na prática, todos esses elementos são apenas traços de personalidade; e eles não podem ser pura e simplesmente criminalizados porque ideólogos e militantes progressistas iluminados não gostam deles.

Tanto pela ética quanto pela ótica jusnaturalista, é facilmente compreensível entender que esses traços de personalidade não podem ser criminalizados ou proibidos simplesmente porque integrantes de uma ideologia não tem nenhuma apreciação ou simpatia por eles. Da mesma forma, nenhum desses traços de personalidade representa em si um perigo para a sociedade, pelo simples fato de existir. Por incrível que pareça, até mesmo o machismo, o racismo, o fascismo e a homofobia merecem a devida apologia.

Mas vamos analisar cada um desses tópicos separadamente para entender isso melhor.

Racismo

Quando falamos no Japão, normalmente não fazemos nenhuma associação da sociedade japonesa com o racismo. No entanto, é incontestável o fato de que a sociedade japonesa pode ser considerada uma das sociedades mais racistas do mundo. E a verdade é que não há absolutamente nada de errado com isso.

Aproximadamente 97% da população do Japão é nativa; apenas 3% do componente populacional é constituído por estrangeiros (a população do Japão é estimada em aproximadamente 126 milhões de habitantes). Isso faz a sociedade japonesa ser uma das mais homogêneas do mundo. As autoridades japonesas reconhecidamente dificultam processos de seleção e aplicação a estrangeiros que desejam se tornar residentes. E a maioria dos japoneses aprova essa decisão.

Diversos estabelecimentos comerciais como hotéis, bares e restaurantes por todo o país tem placas na entrada que dizem “somente para japoneses” e a maioria destes estabelecimentos se recusa ostensivamente a atender ou aceitar clientes estrangeiros, não importa quão ricos ou abastados sejam.

Na Terra do Sol Nascente, a hostilidade e a desconfiança natural para com estrangeiros é tão grande que até mesmo indivíduos que nascem em algum outro país, mas são filhos de pais japoneses, não são considerados cidadãos plenamente japoneses.

Se estes indivíduos decidem sair do seu país de origem para se estabelecer no Japão — mesmo tendo descendência nipônica legítima e inquestionável —, eles enfrentarão uma discriminação social considerável, especialmente se não dominarem o idioma japonês de forma impecável. Esse fato mostra que a discriminação é uma parte tão indissociável quanto elementar da sociedade japonesa, e ela está tão profundamente arraigada à cultura nipônica que é praticamente impossível alterá-la ou atenuá-la por qualquer motivo.

A verdade é que — quando falamos de um país como o Japão — nem todos os discursos politicamente corretos do mundo, nem a histeria progressista ocidental mais inflamada poderão algum dia modificar, extirpar ou sequer atenuar o componente racista da cultura nipônica. E isso é consequência de uma questão tão simples quanto primordial: discriminar faz parte da natureza humana, sendo tanto um direito individual quanto um elemento cultural inerente à muitas nações do mundo. Os japoneses não tem problema algum em admitir ou institucionalizar o seu preconceito, justamente pelo fato de que a ideologia politicamente correta não tem no oriente a força e a presença que tem no ocidente.

E é fundamental enfatizar que, sendo de natureza pacífica — ou seja, não violando nem agredindo terceiros —, a discriminação é um recurso natural dos seres humanos, que está diretamente associada a questões como familiaridade e segurança.

Absolutamente ninguém deve ser forçado a apreciar ou integrar-se a raças, etnias, pessoas ou tribos que não lhe transmitem sentimentos de segurança ou familiaridade. Integração forçada é o verdadeiro crime, e isso diversos países europeus — principalmente os escandinavos (países que lideram o ranking de submissão à ideologia politicamente correta) — aprenderam da pior forma possível.

A integração forçada com imigrantes islâmicos resultou em ondas de assassinato, estupro e violência inimagináveis para diversos países europeus, até então civilizados, que a imprensa ocidental politicamente correta e a militância progressista estão permanentemente tentando esconder, porque não desejam que o ocidente descubra como a agenda “humanitária” de integração forçada dos povos muçulmanos em países do Velho Mundo resultou em algumas das piores chacinas e tragédias na história recente da Europa.

Ou seja, ao discriminarem estrangeiros, os japoneses estão apenas se protegendo e lutando para preservar sua nação como um ambiente cultural, étnico e social que lhe é seguro e familiar, assim se opondo a mudanças bruscas, indesejadas e antinaturais, que poderiam comprometer a estabilidade social do país.

A discriminação — sendo de natureza pacífica —, é benévola, salutar e indubitavelmente ajuda a manter a estabilidade social da comunidade. Toda e qualquer forma de integração forçada deve ser repudiada com veemência, pois, mais cedo ou mais tarde, ela irá subverter a ordem social vigente, e sempre será acompanhada de deploráveis e dramáticos resultados.

Para citar novamente os países escandinavos, a Suécia é um excelente exemplo do que não fazer. Tendo seguido o caminho contrário ao da discriminação racional praticada pela sociedade japonesa, atualmente a sociedade sueca — além de afundar de forma consistente na lama da libertinagem, da decadência e da deterioração progressista — sofre em demasia com os imigrantes muçulmanos, que foram deixados praticamente livres para matar, saquear, esquartejar e estuprar quem eles quiserem. Hoje, eles são praticamente intocáveis, visto que denunciá-los, desmoralizá-los ou acusá-los de qualquer crime é uma atitude politicamente incorreta e altamente reprovada pelo establishment progressista. A elite socialista sueca jamais se atreve a acusá-los de qualquer crime, pois temem ser classificados como xenófobos e intolerantes. Ou seja, a desgraça da Europa, sobretudo dos países escandinavos, foi não ter oferecido nenhuma resistência à ideologia progressista politicamente correta. Hoje, eles são totalmente submissos a ela.

O exemplo do Japão mostra, portanto — para além de qualquer dúvida —, a importância ética e prática da discriminação, que é perfeitamente aceitável e natural, sendo uma tendência inerente aos seres humanos, e portanto intrínseca a determinados comportamentos, sociedades e culturas.

Indo ainda mais longe nessa questão, devemos entender que na verdade todos nós discriminamos, e não existe absolutamente nada de errado nisso. Discriminar pessoas faz parte da natureza humana e quem se recusa a admitir esse fato é um hipócrita. Mulheres discriminam homens na hora de selecionar um parceiro; elas avaliam diversos quesitos, como altura, aparência, status social, condição financeira e carisma. E dentre suas opções, elas sempre escolherão o homem mais atraente, másculo e viril, em detrimento de todos os baixinhos, calvos, carentes, frágeis e inibidos que possam estar disponíveis. Da mesma forma, homens sempre terão preferência por mulheres jovens, atraentes e delicadas, em detrimento de todas as feministas de meia-idade, acima do peso, de cabelo pintado, que são mães solteiras e militantes socialistas. A própria militância progressista discrimina pessoas de forma virulenta e intransigente, como fica evidente no tratamento que dispensam a mulheres bolsonaristas e a negros de direita.

A verdade é que — não importa o nível de histeria da militância progressista — a discriminação é inerente à condição humana e um direito natural inalienável de todos. É parte indissociável da natureza humana e qualquer pessoa pode e deve exercer esse direito sempre que desejar. Não existe absolutamente nada de errado em discriminar pessoas. O problema real é a ideologia progressista e o autoritarismo politicamente correto, movimentos tirânicos que não respeitam o direito das pessoas de discriminar.

Fascismo

Quando falamos de fascismo, precisamos entender que, para a esquerda política, o fascismo é compreendido como um conceito completamente divorciado do seu significado original. Para um militante de esquerda, fascista é todo aquele que defende posicionamentos contrários ao progressismo, não se referindo necessariamente a um fascista clássico.

Mas, seja como for, é necessário entender que — como qualquer ideologia política — até mesmo o fascismo clássico tem o direito de existir e ocupar o seu devido lugar; portanto, fascistas não devem ser arbitrariamente censurados, apesar de defenderem conceitos que representam uma completa antítese de tudo aquilo que é valioso para os entusiastas da liberdade.

Em um país como o Brasil, onde socialistas e comunistas tem total liberdade para se expressar, defender suas ideologias e até mesmo formar partidos políticos, não faz absolutamente o menor sentido que fascistas — e até mesmo nazistas assumidos — sofram qualquer tipo de discriminação. Embora socialistas e comunistas se sintam moralmente superiores aos fascistas (ou a qualquer outra filosofia política ou escola de pensamento), sabemos perfeitamente que o seu senso de superioridade é fruto de uma pueril romantização universitária da sua própria ideologia. A história mostra efetivamente que o socialismo clássico e o comunismo causaram muito mais destruição do que o fascismo.

Portanto, se socialistas e comunistas tem total liberdade para se expressar, não existe a menor razão para que fascistas não usufruam dessa mesma liberdade.

É claro, nesse ponto, seremos invariavelmente confrontados por um oportuno dilema — o famoso paradoxo da intolerância, de Karl Popper. Até que ponto uma sociedade livre e tolerante deve tolerar a intolerância (inerente a ideologias totalitárias)?

As leis de propriedade privada resolveriam isso em uma sociedade livre. O mais importante a levarmos em consideração no atual contexto, no entanto — ao defender ou criticar uma determinada ideologia, filosofia ou escola de pensamento —, é entender que, seja ela qual for, ela tem o direito de existir. E todas as pessoas que a defendem tem o direito de defendê-la, da mesma maneira que todos os seus detratores tem o direito de criticá-la.

Essa é uma forte razão para jamais apoiarmos a censura. Muito pelo contrário, devemos repudiar com veemência e intransigência toda e qualquer forma de censura, especialmente a estatal.

Existem duas fortes razões para isso:

A primeira delas é a volatilidade da censura (especialmente a estatal). A censura oficial do governo, depois que é implementada, torna-se absolutamente incontrolável. Hoje, ela pode estar apontada para um grupo de pessoas cujas ideias divergem das suas. Mas amanhã, ela pode estar apontada justamente para as ideias que você defende. É fundamental, portanto, compreendermos que a censura estatal é incontrolável. Sob qualquer ponto de vista, é muito mais vantajoso que exista uma vasta pluralidade de ideias conflitantes na sociedade competindo entre si, do que o estado decidir que ideias podem ser difundidas ou não.

Além do mais, libertários e anarcocapitalistas não podem nunca esperar qualquer tipo de simpatia por parte das autoridades governamentais. Para o estado, seria infinitamente mais prático e vantajoso criminalizar o libertarianismo e o anarcocapitalismo — sob a alegação de que são filosofias perigosas difundidas por extremistas radicais que ameaçam o estado democrático de direito — do que o fascismo ou qualquer outra ideologia centralizada em governos burocráticos e onipotentes. Portanto, defender a censura, especialmente a estatal, representa sempre um perigo para o próprio indivíduo, que mais cedo ou mais tarde poderá ver a censura oficial do sistema se voltar contra ele.

Outra razão pela qual libertários jamais devem defender a censura, é porque — ao contrário dos estatistas — não é coerente que defensores da liberdade se comportem como se o estado fosse o seu papai e o governo fosse a sua mamãe. Não devemos terceirizar nossas próprias responsabilidades, tampouco devemos nos comportar como adultos infantilizados. Assumimos a responsabilidade de combater todas as ideologias e filosofias que agridem a liberdade e os seres humanos. Não procuramos políticos ou burocratas para executar essa tarefa por nós.

Portanto, se você ver um fascista sendo censurado nas redes sociais ou em qualquer outro lugar, assuma suas dores. Sinta-se compelido a defendê-lo, mostre aos seus detratores que ele tem todo direito de se expressar, como qualquer pessoa. Você não tem obrigação de concordar com ele ou apreciar as ideias que ele defende. Mas silenciar arbitrariamente qualquer pessoa não é uma pauta que honra a liberdade.

Se você não gosta de estado, planejamento central, burocracia, impostos, tarifas, políticas coletivistas, nacionalistas e desenvolvimentistas, mostre com argumentos coesos e convincentes porque a liberdade e o livre mercado são superiores a todos esses conceitos. Mas repudie a censura com intransigência e mordacidade.

Em primeiro lugar, porque você aprecia e defende a liberdade de expressão para todas as pessoas. E em segundo lugar, por entender perfeitamente que — se a censura eventualmente se tornar uma política de estado vigente entre a sociedade — é mais provável que ela atinja primeiro os defensores da liberdade do que os defensores do estado.

Machismo

Muitos elementos do comportamento masculino que hoje são atacados com virulência e considerados machistas pelo movimento progressista são na verdade manifestações naturais intrínsecas ao homem, que nossos avôs cultivaram ao longo de suas vidas sem serem recriminados por isso. Com a ascensão do feminismo, do progressismo e a eventual problematização do sexo masculino, o antagonismo militante dos principais líderes da revolução sexual da contracultura passou a naturalmente condenar todos os atributos genuinamente masculinos, por considerá-los símbolos de opressão e dominação social.

Apesar do Brasil ser uma sociedade liberal ultra-progressista, onde o estado protege mais as mulheres do que as crianças — afinal, a cada semana novas leis são implementadas concedendo inúmeros privilégios e benefícios às mulheres, aos quais elas jamais teriam direito em uma sociedade genuinamente machista e patriarcal —, a esquerda política persiste em tentar difundir a fantasia da opressão masculina e o mito de que vivemos em uma sociedade machista e patriarcal.

Como sempre, a realidade mostra um cenário muito diferente daquilo que é pregado pela militância da terra da fantasia. O Brasil atual não tem absolutamente nada de machista ou patriarcal. No Brasil, mulheres podem votar, podem ocupar posições de poder e autoridade tanto na esfera pública quanto em companhias privadas, podem se candidatar a cargos políticos, podem ser vereadoras, deputadas, governadoras, podem ser proprietárias do próprio negócio, podem se divorciar, podem dirigir, podem comprar armas, podem andar de biquíni nas praias, podem usar saias extremamente curtas, podem ver programas de televisão sobre sexo voltados única e exclusivamente para o público feminino, podem se casar com outras mulheres, podem ser promíscuas, podem consumir bebidas alcoólicas ao ponto da embriaguez, e podem fazer praticamente tudo aquilo que elas desejarem. No Brasil do século XXI, as mulheres são genuinamente livres para fazer as próprias escolhas em praticamente todos os aspectos de suas vidas. O que mostra efetivamente que a tal opressão do patriarcado não existe.

O liberalismo social extremo do qual as mulheres usufruem no Brasil atual — e que poderíamos estender a toda a sociedade contemporânea ocidental — é suficiente para desmantelar completamente a fábula feminista da sociedade patriarcal machista e opressora, que existe única e exclusivamente no mundinho de fantasias ideológicas da esquerda progressista.

Tão importante quanto, é fundamental compreender que nenhum homem é obrigado a levar o feminismo a sério ou considerá-lo um movimento social e político legítimo. Para um homem, ser considerado machista ou até mesmo assumir-se como um não deveria ser um problema. O progressismo e o feminismo — com o seu nefasto hábito de demonizar os homens, bem como todos os elementos inerentes ao comportamento e a cultura masculina — é que são o verdadeiro problema, conforme tentam modificar o homem para transformá-lo em algo que ele não é nem deveria ser: uma criatura dócil, passiva e submissa, que é comandada por ideologias hostis e antinaturais, que não respeitam a hierarquia de uma ordem social milenar e condições inerentes à própria natureza humana. Com o seu hábito de tentar modificar tudo através de leis e decretos, o feminismo e o progressismo mostram efetivamente que o seu real objetivo é criminalizar a masculinidade.

A verdade é que — usufruindo de um nível elevado de liberdades — não existe praticamente nada que a mulher brasileira do século XXI não possa fazer. Adicionalmente, o governo dá as mulheres uma quantidade tão avassaladora de vantagens, privilégios e benefícios, que está ficando cada vez mais difícil para elas encontrarem razões válidas para reclamarem da vida. Se o projeto de lei que pretende fornecer um auxílio mensal de mil e duzentos reais para mães solteiras for aprovado pelo senado, muitas mulheres que tem filhos não precisarão nem mesmo trabalhar para ter sustento. E tantas outras procurarão engravidar, para ter direito a receber uma mesada mensal do governo até o seu filho completar a maioridade.

O que a militância colorida da terra da fantasia convenientemente ignora — pois a realidade nunca corresponde ao seu conto de fadas ideológico — é que o mundo de uma forma geral continua sendo muito mais implacável com os homens do que é com as mulheres. No Brasil, a esmagadora maioria dos suicídios é praticada por homens, a maioria das vítimas de homicídio são homens e de cada quatro moradores de rua, três são homens. Mas é evidente que uma sociedade liberal ultra-progressista não se importa com os homens, pois ela não é influenciada por fatos concretos ou pela realidade. Seu objetivo é simplesmente atender as disposições de uma agenda ideológica, não importa quão divorciadas da realidade elas são.

O nível exacerbado de liberdades sociais e privilégios governamentais dos quais as mulheres brasileiras usufruem é suficiente para destruir a fantasiosa fábula da sociedade machista, opressora e patriarcal. Se as mulheres brasileiras não estão felizes, a culpa definitivamente não é dos homens. Se a vasta profusão de liberdades, privilégios e benefícios da sociedade ocidental não as deixa plenamente saciadas e satisfeitas, elas podem sempre mudar de ares e tentar uma vida mais abnegada e espartana em países como Irã, Paquistão ou Afeganistão. Quem sabe assim elas não se sentirão melhores e mais realizadas?

Homofobia

Quando falamos em homofobia, entramos em uma categoria muito parecida com a do racismo: o direito de discriminação é totalmente válido. Absolutamente ninguém deve ser obrigado a aceitar homossexuais ou considerar o homossexualismo como algo normal. Sendo cristão, não existe nem sequer a mais vaga possibilidade de que algum dia eu venha a aceitar o homossexualismo como algo natural. O homossexualismo se qualifica como um grave desvio de conduta e um pecado contra o Criador.

A Bíblia proíbe terminantemente conduta sexual imoral, o que — além do homossexualismo — inclui adultério, fornicação, incesto e bestialidade, entre outras formas igualmente pérfidas de degradação.

Segue abaixo três passagens bíblicas que proíbem terminantemente a conduta homossexual:

“Não te deitarás com um homem como se deita com uma mulher. Isso é abominável!” (Levítico 18:22 — King James Atualizada)

“Se um homem se deitar com outro homem, como se deita com mulher, ambos terão praticado abominação; certamente serão mortos; o seu sangue estará sobre eles.” (Levítico 20:13 — João Ferreira de Almeida Atualizada)

“O quê! Não sabeis que os injustos não herdarão o reino de Deus? Não sejais desencaminhados. Nem fornicadores, nem idólatras, nem adúlteros, nem homens mantidos para propósitos desnaturais, nem homens que se deitam com homens, nem ladrões, nem gananciosos, nem beberrões, nem injuriadores, nem extorsores herdarão o reino de Deus.” (1 Coríntios 6:9,10 —Tradução do Novo Mundo das Escrituras Sagradas com Referências)

Se você não é religioso, pode simplesmente levar em consideração o argumento do respeito pela ordem natural. A ordem natural é incondicional e incisiva com relação a uma questão: o complemento de tudo o que existe é o seu oposto, não o seu igual. O complemento do dia é a noite, o complemento da luz é a escuridão, o complemento da água, que é líquida, é a terra, que é sólida. E como sabemos o complemento do macho — de sua respectiva espécie — é a fêmea.

Portanto, o complemento do homem, o macho da espécie humana, é naturalmente a mulher, a fêmea da espécie humana. Um homem e uma mulher podem naturalmente se reproduzir, porque são um complemento biológico natural. Por outro lado, um homem e outro homem são incapazes de se reproduzir, assim como uma mulher e outra mulher.

Infelizmente, o mundo atual está longe de aceitar como plenamente estabelecida a ordem natural pelo simples fato dela existir, visto que tentam subvertê-la a qualquer custo, não importa o malabarismo intelectual que tenham que fazer para justificar os seus pontos de vista distorcidos e antinaturais. A libertinagem irrefreável e a imoralidade bestial do mundo contemporâneo pós-moderno não reconhecem nenhum tipo de limite. Quem tenta restabelecer princípios morais salutares é imediatamente considerado um vilão retrógrado e repressivo, sendo ativamente demonizado pela militância do hedonismo, da luxúria e da licenciosidade desenfreada e sem limites.

Definitivamente, fazer a apologia da moralidade, do autocontrole e do autodomínio não faz nenhum sucesso na Sodoma e Gomorra global dos dias atuais. O que faz sucesso é lacração, devassidão, promiscuidade e prazeres carnais vazios. O famoso escritor e filósofo francês Albert Camus expressou uma verdade contundente quando disse: “Uma só frase lhe bastará para definir o homem moderno — fornicava e lia jornais”.

Qualquer indivíduo tem o direito inalienável de discriminar ativamente homossexuais, pelo direito que ele julgar mais pertinente no seu caso. A objeção de consciência para qualquer situação é um direito natural dos indivíduos. Há alguns anos, um caso que aconteceu nos Estados Unidos ganhou enorme repercussão internacional, quando o confeiteiro Jack Phillips se recusou a fazer um bolo de casamento para o “casal” homossexual Dave Mullins e Charlie Craig.

Uma representação dos direitos civis do estado do Colorado abriu um inquérito contra o confeiteiro, alegando que ele deveria ser obrigado a atender todos os clientes, independente da orientação sexual, raça ou crença. Preste atenção nas palavras usadas — ele deveria ser obrigado a atender.

Como se recusou bravamente a ceder, o caso foi parar invariavelmente na Suprema Corte, que decidiu por sete a dois em favor de Jack Phillips, sob a alegação de que obrigar o confeiteiro a atender o “casal” homossexual era uma violação nefasta dos seus princípios religiosos. Felizmente, esse foi um caso em que a liberdade prevaleceu sobre a tirania progressista.

Evidentemente, homossexuais não devem ser agredidos, ofendidos, internados em clínicas contra a sua vontade, nem devem ser constrangidos em suas liberdades pelo fato de serem homossexuais. O que eles precisam entender é que a liberdade é uma via de mão dupla. Eles podem ter liberdade para adotar a conduta que desejarem e fazer o que quiserem (contanto que não agridam ninguém), mas da mesma forma, é fundamental respeitar e preservar a liberdade de terceiros que desejam rejeitá-los pacificamente, pelo motivo que for.

Afinal, ninguém tem a menor obrigação de aceitá-los, atendê-los ou sequer pensar que uma união estável entre duas pessoas do mesmo sexo — incapaz de gerar descendentes, e, portanto, antinatural — deva ser considerado um matrimônio de verdade. Absolutamente nenhuma pessoa, ideia, movimento, crença ou ideologia usufrui de plena unanimidade no mundo. Por que o homossexualismo deveria ter tal privilégio?

Homossexuais não são portadores de uma verdade definitiva, absoluta e indiscutível, que está acima da humanidade. São seres humanos comuns que — na melhor das hipóteses —, levam um estilo de vida que pode ser considerado “alternativo”, e absolutamente ninguém tem a obrigação de considerar esse estilo de vida normal ou aceitável. A única obrigação das pessoas é não interferir, e isso não implica uma obrigação em aceitar.

Discriminar homossexuais (assim como pessoas de qualquer outro grupo, raça, religião, nacionalidade ou etnia) é um direito natural por parte de todos aqueles que desejam exercer esse direito. E isso nem o direito positivo nem a militância progressista poderão algum dia alterar ou subverter. O direito natural e a inclinação inerente dos seres humanos em atender às suas próprias disposições é simplesmente imutável e faz parte do seu conjunto de necessidades.

Conclusão

A militância progressista é absurdamente autoritária, e todas as suas estratégias e disposições ideológicas mostram que ela está em uma guerra permanente contra a ordem natural, contra a liberdade e principalmente contra o homem branco, cristão, conservador e tradicionalista — possivelmente, aquilo que ela mais odeia e despreza.

Nós não podemos, no entanto, ceder ou dar espaço para a agenda progressista, tampouco pensar em considerar como sendo normais todas as pautas abusivas e tirânicas que a militância pretende estabelecer como sendo perfeitamente razoáveis e aceitáveis, quer a sociedade aceite isso ou não. Afinal, conforme formos cedendo, o progressismo tirânico e totalitário tende a ganhar cada vez mais espaço.

Quanto mais espaço o progressismo conquistar, mais corroída será a liberdade e mais impulso ganhará o totalitarismo. Com isso, a cultura do cancelamento vai acabar com carreiras, profissões e com o sustento de muitas pessoas, pelo simples fato de que elas discordam das pautas universitárias da moda.

A história mostra perfeitamente que quanto mais liberdade uma sociedade tem, mais progresso ela atinge. Por outro lado, quanto mais autoritária ela for, mais retrocessos ela sofrerá. O autoritarismo se combate com liberdade, desafiando as pautas de todos aqueles que persistem em implementar a tirania na sociedade. O politicamente correto é o nazismo dos costumes, que pretende subverter a moral através de uma cultura de vigilância policial despótica e autoritária, para que toda a sociedade seja subjugada pela agenda totalitária progressista.

Pois quanto a nós, precisamos continuar travando o bom combate em nome da liberdade. E isso inclui reconhecer que ideologias, hábitos e costumes de que não gostamos tem o direito de existir e até mesmo de serem defendidos.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

El Servicio Sismológico Nacional de Cuba (SSNC) informó sobre una situación sísmica que calificó de “anómala”, tras registrarse en un lapso de poco más de cuatro horas un total de 255 temblores -ninguno perceptible- con magnitudes entre 0,4 y 3,2 grados en la escala de Richter.

Los temblores fueron reportados en la madrugada del 26 de julio a unos 26 kilómetros al sur del municipio Moa, en los límites de las provincias de Holguín y Guantánamo, según precisó el parte diario del SSNC, adscrito al Centro de Investigaciones Sismológicas (CENAIS).

De acuerdo con la información difundida, el comportamiento telúrico se registró entre la 1:52 am y las 6:00 am (hora local), en la zona de Moa-Purial.

Además de ese enjambre de temblores en la misma localización.

El séptimo y más reciente temblor de tierra perceptible en Cuba se reportó el pasado 6 de junio.

Se trató de un sismo de magnitud 4,9 grados, con epicentro en la localidad suroriental de Caimanera, en Guantánamo, que también se sintió en municipios de Santiago de Cuba.

La mayor actividad sísmica en Cuba se registra en la zona oriental y está relacionada con una falla situada en el límite de la placa de Norteamérica, a la cual pertenece la isla, y otra de la vecina isla La Española, territorio compartido por Haití y República Dominicana.

El año pasado se registraron 13 sismos perceptibles en Cuba, casi todos en las provincias orientales.

La isla está ubicada en una región en la que confluyen diferentes sistemas de fallas tectónicas donde las últimas décadas se han registrado terremotos de gran magnitud.

Entre ellos destacan uno del 25 de mayo de 1992, de magnitud 6,9, que se sintió en la mitad oriental del país. Otro, de magnitud de 7,1, tuvo lugar el 28 de enero de 2020, aunque ese estuvo localizado en las inmediaciones de las Islas Caimán, se sintió en toda Cuba.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

LA HABANA, Cuba. – “¿Ahí vive alguien?”, me preguntó con asombro hace años un amigo italiano que llegaba de visita a Cuba por primera y única vez. En uno de sus paseos, no demasiado alejado de la ruta de todo turista primerizo, había asomado las narices en un solar de La Habana. Hacía el calor insoportable de los veranos de aquí. La lluvia del día anterior, unida a todas las pasadas, aún era visible en la humedad de las paredes y molestamente percibida en el enjambre de fetidez que hoy es el “aroma” inconfundible de la ciudad.

Para este amigo, en aquel momento muy joven, que había llegado a Cuba creyendo en cuanto de lindo había escuchado sobre los “grandes logros de la Revolución Cubana”, no era posible que, en la tierra de su ídolo Fidel Castro, no solo existiera algo así tan feo como la cuartería que había visitado por casualidad sino que ese fuese el verdadero “sello distintivo” de un país donde, a pesar de alardear de guerras en África, un viaje al cosmos, de planes quinquenales en la era soviética, de contingentes que construían pedraplenes, hoteles e instalaciones deportivas para unos Juegos Panamericanos en pleno “Período Especial”, no había sido capaz de resolver el asunto de la vivienda para los trabajadores.

Y rápido fue el paso del asombro a la decepción total cuando al día siguiente hizo otros varios “descubrimientos”, como que aquellos lugares miserables no estaban habitados exclusivamente por “marginales” y “desechos de la sociedad” —como algún “ilustre” anfitrión de la Unión de Jóvenes Comunistas quiso hacerle creer—, sino que eran además el hogar de médicos, artistas, incluso de arquitectos e ingenieros para quienes las habilidades de salvar vidas y crear maravillas del ingenio humano jamás les habían sido suficientes para agenciarse un espacio familiar o personal decoroso. También descubrió por esos días, invitado por el hijo de algún alto dirigente del Partido Comunista a una casona de Miramar, que los principales artífices de la Revolución Cubana, al igual que la mayoría de las figuras más prominentes en el poder, ni siquiera vivían en barrios o bloques de viviendas creados después de enero de 1959 por ellos mismos sino que, simplemente, se habían mudado al día siguiente a las mansiones de esa “burguesía” que decían detestar y combatir, y hasta en algunos casos usaban sus muebles, utensilios, adornos y actitudes de clase de esos que debieron huir y hasta sufrir vejaciones, prisión o expropiación (e igual todo a la vez), obligados por un cambio político supuestamente “en favor de los humildes”.

En muy pocos días, y con apenas veintitantos años de edad, este amigo extranjero concluyó lo que incluso a muchos cubanos y cubanas les ha tomado demasiado tiempo descubrir: que la Revolución no es otra cosa que un largo y tortuoso proceso de sucesivos engaños y desengaños, y que por tantas ilusiones que ha robado y aniquilado, tantos proyectos de vida truncados, debería ser llamada “roboilusión”, que fue precisamente la palabra que usó, hace poco más de 20 años atrás, mientras me explicaba por qué no regresaría jamás a Cuba.

Hace unos días, mientras miraba junto a otro amigo la escena de la película The Mother (de 2023, interpretada por Jennifer López en el papel principal), que intenta recrear (desde algún lugar de Gran Canaria) el ambiente de La Habana en el presente, con las calles sucias, solares mugrientos y edificios deteriorados, comentábamos lo muy poco logrado que fue el intento, aun cuando en el uniforme escolar de unos niños que pasan y la breve discusión de un botero al que le han chocado el “almendrón”, se nota el esfuerzo que hizo la directora del filme por captar nuestra atmósfera “enrarecida” y “exótica”.

Pero, olvidando incluso el cliché de que algo tan feo solo puede ser habitado por “marginales” —entre ¡cajas de naranjas y de pomos leche! en las esquinas (totalmente increíble), entre autos demasiado modernos para la vetustez general que nos agobia, más otros miles de desaciertos—, los edificios en ruina y los solares de la película, bien deprimentes pero fuertes y sin “estática milagrosa”, ni siquiera se acercan a la triste realidad que exhiben los de acá, que son en su mayoría un peligro para la vida de quienes lo habitan.

Viendo el fracaso decepcionante de la escena es que recordé la decepción del amigo italiano, surgida de la contemplación de ese elemento de nuestro “paisaje cotidiano” que a veces, de tan ordinario, dejamos de ver y que son nuestras propias viviendas, nuestras ciudades en ruinas como indudable expresión de un engaño. Elementos a veces tan increíblemente inhumanos, bestiales, que resulta muy difícil para alguien ajeno aceptar que habitemos ahí y que, aun así, muchos todavía no alcancen el desengaño.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Sendos operativos policiales se reportan en las últimas horas en La Habana y Holguín, donde los agentes del orden han decomisado mercancías, mayormente alimentos, a cubanos que se dedicaban a comercializarlos mediante publicaciones de ventas en las redes sociales.

Las redadas llegan días después de que el presidente de la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular (ANPP), Esteban Lazo, dijera en televisión que la medida más efectiva contra los infractores era el “decomiso”.

Por ejemplo, según el perfil de Facebook ‘Un Cubano Fiel’, una de las cuentas que utiliza el Ministerio del Interior (Minint) para divulgar información oficiosa, a un ciudadano identificado como Víctor le fueron ocupados en su casa del barrio Cayo Hueso, en La Habana, numerosos galones de aceite de cocina.

NOTICIAS DE CUBA Operativos policiales en La Habana y Holguín terminan en decomisos tras la amenaza de Lazo

Los implicados supuestamente desviaron alimentos de empresas estatales Foto del avatar

By

Periódico Cubano Published on 26 julio, 2023

Share
Tweet
Comment

Operativos policiales en La Habana y Holguín decomisan mercancías después de la amenaza de Lazo

Al decir de ‘Un Cubano Fiel’, en estos momentos se investiga “la cadena delictiva a la que está vinculado”, pues se sospecha que los implicados no actuaron solos. (Foto: Un Cubano Fiel – Facebook)

Sendos operativos policiales se reportan en las últimas horas en La Habana y Holguín, donde los agentes del orden han decomisado mercancías, mayormente alimentos, a cubanos que se dedicaban a comercializarlos mediante publicaciones de ventas en las redes sociales.

Las redadas llegan días después de que el presidente de la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular (ANPP), Esteban Lazo, dijera en televisión que la medida más efectiva contra los infractores era el “decomiso”.

Por ejemplo, según el perfil de Facebook ‘Un Cubano Fiel’, una de las cuentas que utiliza el Ministerio del Interior (Minint) para divulgar información oficiosa, a un ciudadano identificado como Víctor le fueron ocupados en su casa del barrio Cayo Hueso, en La Habana, numerosos galones de aceite de cocina.

“En Marqués González entre Virtudes y Concordia, Cayo Hueso, Centro Habana, la policía realizó un registro en la casa de Víctor y le ocuparon gran cantidad de aceite comestible en diferentes envases”, refiere la publicación, que adjunta imágenes, evidentemente todas tomadas por la policía.

En otro momento, se asegura que le decomisaron también 28.000 pesos cubanos (CUP), aunque en medio de la galopante inflación que hay en la economía nacional, con una extrema devaluación del peso, esa suma equivale aproximadamente a solo 125 dólares.

Los detalles sobre el origen de la mercancía se desconocen, pero en Cuba no existen fábricas que producen aceite de cocina. El punto de origen puede ser la fábrica de envasar aceite que está en el municipio de Regla. Hasta allí entra la materia prima a granel que se importa por la vía marítima y luego la fraccionan en diferentes formatos, desde medio litro hasta un galón, tanto en pomos plásticos como en bolsas.

El otro operativo policial fue sobre Michaels, un comprador de un hotel en la zona turística de Guardalavaca, al norte de Holguín. El hombre fue detenido cuando se trasladaba a La Habana cargado de mercancía.

Al oficiar un registro en su casa se le decomisó “una gran cantidad de productos, entre ellos; ron y cervezas de varias marcas reconocidas internacionalmente, cárnicos de alta calidad, queso y latas de pintura”, refiere la misma fuente.

Al decir de ‘Un Cubano Fiel’, en estos momentos se investiga “la cadena delictiva a la que está vinculado”, pues se sospecha que en el desvío de recursos no actuó solo.

Algunos cubanos se preguntaron en las redes sociales si la policía ya hizo un registro similar en las casas del administrador, del almacenero y del gerente del hotel donde trabajaba el comercial, que fue atrapado con “las manos en la masa”.

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

The importance of building freedom tools

In a time where censorship and limitation of individual freedoms seem increasingly intense, it is necessary to understand the importance of building tools that favor freedom of expression and free access to information. The ability to freely express our opinions and seek knowledge without restrictions is a fundamental pillar of a democratic and healthy society. In this article, we will explore the need to nurture the creation of such tools in order to ensure the flourishing of freedom in the current world.

Threats to freedom of expression

Currently, we witness the concerning trend of censorship and restriction of dissenting voices. In many circles, ideas contrary to the status quo have been silenced and banned. Such a scenario undermines diversity of thought and creates an environment where only perspectives aligned with dominant currents can be freely expressed. Censorship, in any form, is a worrying demonstration of authoritarianism and can lead to a stagnant and non-progressive society.

Building freedom tools

In the face of this panorama, it is crucial to prioritize the development of tools that facilitate free expression and free access to information. Through these tools, people will be able to share ideas, discuss relevant issues, and expand the horizons of knowledge. By building platforms that allow different perspectives to be heard, we will be strengthening the pillars of freedom and encouraging an environment of critical thinking.

The need to expand access to information

Another fundamental point is to ensure free access to information. In a world where data and knowledge are increasingly valuable, restricting access only to certain groups or filtering information according to particular interests is dangerous for society as a whole. Unrestricted and unmanipulated access to quality information is essential for informed decision-making, whether on a personal, professional, or political level.

Empowering individuals

Building freedom tools is not only a matter of technology but also of empowering individuals. By giving people the necessary tools to express themselves freely and access relevant information, we are empowering them to make informed decisions, contribute to public discourse, and actively participate in the construction of a more just and inclusive society.

Conclusion

Therefore, it is more useful than ever to envision the development of tools as if they have already been banned, as this gives us greater resilience than waiting for the system to accept them. As we already know, centralized construction leads to companies having the weakness of having to respond to the state if it disagrees with what is being done, and thus they will not be able to centrally address these needs.

In summary, in the face of a context where freedom of expression and free access to information face significant threats, it is imperative to build freedom tools that promote a healthy environment for diversity of ideas. Empowering individuals and nurturing the creation of platforms that facilitate the free sharing of information is essential for the preservation of democratic values and the continuous pursuit of progress. Understanding the importance of such tools makes us reflect on our role as defenders of freedom in an increasingly connected and globalized society.

Build as if you had already been banned!

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

A Importância de Construir Ferramentas de Liberdade

Em uma época onde a censura e a limitação das liberdades individuais parecem cada vez mais intensas, é necessário compreender a importância de construir ferramentas que favoreçam a liberdade de expressão e o livre acesso à informação. A capacidade de expressar livremente nossas opiniões e buscar conhecimento sem restrições é um pilar fundamental de uma sociedade democrática e saudável. Neste artigo, exploraremos a necessidade de nutrir a criação de tais ferramentas, a fim de garantir o florescimento da liberdade no mundo atual.

Ameaças à Liberdade de Expressão

Atualmente, testemunhamos a preocupante tendência de censura e restrição das vozes dissidentes. Em muitos círculos, ideias contrárias ao status quo têm sido silenciadas e banidas. Tal cenário mina a diversidade de pensamento e cria um ambiente onde apenas perspectivas alinhadas com as correntes dominantes podem ser expressas livremente. A censura, em qualquer forma, é uma demonstração preocupante de autoritarismo e pode conduzir a uma sociedade estagnada e sem progresso.

Construindo Ferramentas de Liberdade

Diante deste panorama, é crucial priorizar o desenvolvimento de ferramentas que facilitem a livre expressão e o livre acesso à informação. Por meio dessas ferramentas, as pessoas poderão compartilhar ideias, discutir questões relevantes e expandir os horizontes do conhecimento. Ao construir plataformas que permitam que diferentes perspectivas sejam ouvidas, estaremos fortalecendo os pilares da liberdade e incentivando um ambiente de pensamento crítico.

A Necessidade de Ampliar o Acesso à Informação

Outro ponto fundamental é garantir o livre acesso à informação. Em um mundo onde dados e conhecimento são cada vez mais valiosos, restringir seu acesso apenas a determinados grupos ou filtrar informações de acordo com interesses particulares é perigoso para a sociedade como um todo. O acesso irrestrito e sem manipulações a informações de qualidade é essencial para que decisões informadas possam ser tomadas, seja em âmbito pessoal, profissional ou político.

Empoderando os Indivíduos

Construir ferramentas de liberdade não é apenas uma questão de tecnologia, mas também de empoderamento dos indivíduos. Ao dar às pessoas as ferramentas necessárias para se expressarem livremente e acessarem informações relevantes, estamos capacitando-as a tomar decisões informadas, contribuir para o debate público e participar ativamente na construção de uma sociedade mais justa e inclusiva.

Conclusão

Por tudo isto é mais util que nunca formar uma visão de desenvolvimento das ferramentas como se as mesmas já tivessem sido banidas, isto nos dá uma resiliencia muito maior do que se estivermos á espera que o sistema aceite as mesmas. Como já é sabido de todos nós a construção centralizada leva a que as empresas tenham o ponto fraco de ter que responder ao estado caso ele não concorde com o que está a ser feito, e com isso não conseguirão centralizadamente responder a essas necessidades.

Em resumo, diante de um contexto onde a liberdade de expressão e o livre acesso à informação enfrentam ameaças significativas, é imperativo construir ferramentas de liberdade que promovam um ambiente saudável para a diversidade de ideias. Empoderar os indivíduos e nutrir a criação de plataformas que facilitem o livre compartilhamento de informações é essencial para a preservação de valores democráticos e a busca contínua do progresso. Compreender a importância de tais ferramentas nos faz refletir sobre nosso papel como defensores da liberdade em uma sociedade cada vez mais conectada e globalizada.

Constroi como se já tivesses banido!

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

El miércoles 26 de julio fallecieron cuatro personas en Sancti Spíritus cuando un camión, desprovisto de barandas, intentó cruzar el río Yayabo que estaba crecido por las intensas lluvias y fueron arrastradas por la corriente, según un reporte del diario oficialista Escambray.

Un informe preliminar del Ministerio del Interior (Minint) en la provincia señala que el chofer del camión particular fue imprudente al intentar atravesar el puente de la comunidad Las Tosas y como resultado de la fuerza del río perdió el control del vehículo que fue arrastrado aguas abajo.

En el camión iban 10 personas de una misma familia. Entre los fallecidos hay dos menores de edad de 4 y 15 años, respectivamente. Los otros dos muertos fueron un hombre de 49 años y una mujer de 61. Además, hay otros dos infantes, una niña de 9 años y un varón de 8 que están internados en el Hospital Pediátrico Provincial recibiendo atención sanitaria.

El intendente del Gobierno municipal de Sancti Spíritus, Jaile Rabelo Orellana, se pronunció ante los medios oficiales, asegurando que las autoridades del Partido y el Gobierno local se dirigieron rápidamente al lugar de los hechos para apoyar en las labores de rescate, en colaboración con los vecinos y las fuerzas del Ministerio del Interior.

El río Yayabo es afluente del Río Zaza y su nacimiento se localiza a una altura de 520 metros sobre el nivel del mar en el municipio de Fomento, justo en las estribaciones del Escambray, en una zona cercana a Caballete de Casa. En su recorrido atraviesa la ciudad de Sancti Spíritus y le da el sobrenombre de la ciudad del Yayabo antes de verter sus aguas en la presa Zaza. Accidentes en Cuba

Según los reportes más actualizados en el primer semestre del 2023, Cuba ha registrado más de 3.600 accidentes de tránsito, con 290 personas fallecidas y más de 2.800 heridas.

De acuerdo con datos proporcionados por el jefe del Órgano Especializado de Tránsito de la Dirección General de la Policía Nacional Revolucionaria (PNR), el coronel Roberto Rodríguez Fernández, el “factor humano” es responsable del 90% de los accidentes. El restante 10% se atribuye a malas condiciones de la vía y desperfectos mecánicos.

Las edades más afectadas son entre 46 y 55 años, y los conductores jóvenes entre 21 y 35 años también están involucrados en un 22% de los accidentes. La mayoría de los siniestros ocurren en zonas urbanas y áreas residenciales, siendo Pinar del Río y Villa Clara las provincias más afectadas.

El horario más crítico es entre las 3 p.m. y las 6 p.m., y los peatones son especialmente vulnerables, con un alto índice de mortalidad en caso de atropello.

@ 32dc4f25:f95ddcce

In Nostr, "smart clients and dumb servers" refers to a communication model or architecture where the clients (smart clients) have higher logic capability and autonomy, while the servers (dumb servers) have lower logic capability and passive execution.

Welcome read more of my articles form decentralized long content platform-- yakihonne.com

Smart clients refer to client applications or devices that possess higher intelligence and processing power. They can make autonomous decisions and perform specific tasks, including handling business logic, processing data, communicating, and coordinating interactions with other services. In Nostr, smart clients play an active role, responsible for controlling the communication flow, processing data and protocols, and executing necessary business logic.

Dumb servers, on the other hand, refer to servers with lower intelligence and passive execution capability. They are designed to perform basic data storage and transmission functions without handling complex business logic or decision-making. In Nostr, dumb servers act as passive recipients, receiving and transmitting data based on instructions from smart clients but not participating in active decision-making or coordination.

The concept of smart clients and dumb servers in Nostr aims to achieve a distributed and decentralized communication model. Smart clients take charge of managing the communication flow and business logic, reducing reliance on centralized servers and the risk of single points of failure. At the same time, the passive execution capability of dumb servers makes the system more scalable and flexible, allowing more services and nodes to join the communication network.

In summary, the smart clients and dumb servers model in Nostr provides a flexible, scalable, and decentralized communication architecture by decentralizing decision-making and logic to the clients and restricting servers to basic data storage and transmission functions.

Smart clients and dumb servers are the core idea in microservices

The tech development space is dominated by mantras — sayings that make sense in context but are repeated away from their original source. These expressions may carry meaning for the initiated but are often seen as complicated jargon to others. One such concept is “smart endpoints and dumb pipes.” Accredited to Martin Fowler, the idea is helpful to consider when designing microservices architectures.

The basic premise of “smart endpoints and dumb pipes” is that microservices should carry their own communication logic (the “endpoints”), and the carrier superstructure that transmits these messages (the “pipes”) should have as light a structure as possible. Why is this so? What’s the justification, and what’s the background upon which this conversation on pipes and endpoints exists?

Below, we’ll attempt to clarify what the saying means. We’ll look at where it came from, how it applies to microservice development, and see why it’s a helpful expression for modern software architects to understand.

The Problem of the Monolith

We’ve talked at length about both monoliths and microservices, but it bears significant importance to this discussion, so we will again define them.

Understanding Monolith

The traditional approach to development is often referred to by a singular term — the monolith. Monolithic development adopts a centralized data storage and response. A holdover from the era of mainframes and clients, the basic idea is to create a vertical stack wherein everything is located and guided by a single, all-powerful system. This non-distributed approach meant that everything existed in one body. Software applications were self-contained and non-modular, with requests being handled by a singular entity.

Often, these solutions were purpose-built, with many organizations utilizing a monolith due to their startup phases being singularly focused. This resulted in APIs that were non-modular, specific in intent and purpose to the point of rejecting extensibility and scalability in favor of stability and a functional response.

There are some strengths to this kind of approach. First, it’s often cheaper to engage with at the start. Building something to do one thing — and only one thing — is often more affordable than building a system that allows for many things. In such a monolithic approach, the service is a one-to-one relationship — the server owns the data, how it’s transmitted, and how it’s serviced, making a clear communication pathway.

Unfortunately, this means that monoliths are heavily siloed, lacking a malleable underlying codebase. Alterations or replacements carry an enormous cost in both time and resources. This can result in a sort of code paralysis just due to the sheer weight of the system. It can also result in a high cost to develop, maintain, and run. As a monolith grows larger, it remains constrained to its original design, incurring ever-growing expenses to add new components. This results in late-stage development that carries massive deployment burdens and slower release schedules.

Understanding Microservices

Microservices were designed to solve this problem. In essence, the microservice paradigm represents a sea change from isolated singular monoliths to a collection of smaller, single-purpose services that work in concert. With each service doing a specific thing, the idea is that those services would then work together to facilitate the core function.

This shift from non-distributed to distributed, from centralized to decentralized, delivers significant benefits. First, the system becomes much more scalable. An application can slot in new services or change existing ones without adverse end-user experience changes. Iteration does not freeze new development, as you’re changing a small part of the greater subset. You can compare this to changing clothes — if your entire outfit was all sewn together, as in a monolith, you would be unable to change your jacket or put on a hat without a huge effort. A microservice allows you to, metaphorically speaking, change hats or jackets at will. This is possible because the individual parts are only connected by necessity, not enforcement.

This also means microservices do not carry with them the problem of siloing. With components architected as microservices, the overall system can change, mold itself, and adapt to circumstances without affecting any other part. Business logic can be represented on the node with the closest affinity to its function, rather than being centralized into a singular node of control.

This system does introduce additional complexity, as we’ll cover below, yet the benefits are so substantial that many software architects have adopted it whole-heartedly.

The Solution: Smart or Dumb Pipes?

While microservices fix many of the issues of the monolith, some unique problems arise. Microservices don’t isolate everything into a single vertical silo, which is great — systems can be spread across multiple nodes and instances, creating a lot of variability in resource location. This also, unfortunately, creates some communication complexity. Think about it this way — imagine you are trying to do a group project, but instead of everyone sitting at the same conference table, you are all several miles apart. This would introduce significant communication barriers, even while introducing more extensibility and scalability to your group.

Microservices face this exact problem when it comes to facilitating inter-microservice communication. How do you solve that communication problem? There are really only two options: either you create smart pipes, or you create smart endpoints.

You could solve the microservices communication problem by creating smart pipes, and many implementations have employed this solution. An excellent example of this type, the Enterprise Service Bus, allows for the logic and processing governing communication to be placed in a singular system, a facilitation center, to make communication stable and efficient. However, the problem with doing this is that you’ve created a vertical system of centralization — while the entities doing the work are decentralized, all communication is centralized to this ESB, resulting in a sort of quasi-monolithic approach.

While an ESB is not itself bad — and to put a finer point, not necessarily a monolithic approach — taking it too far can certainly lead to a lot of the same issues incurred with a monolithic strategy.

Smart Endpoints and Dumb Pipes

A great solution is to go the other way. Instead of making your pipes smart, make your endpoints smart! In this system, you’re shifting the paradigm away from the idea of a communications bus and closer towards self-sufficient nodes. In essence, you are taking that business logic, communication logic, and general governance away from the communication node and are instead placing it firmly in the entities doing the talking.

The core idea of “smart endpoints and dumb pipes” is that the microservices, when designed correctly, don’t need a bus to govern this communication. The services themselves can govern the logical breakout of communication without going through an intermediary. If the User Service needs to talk to the Authentication Service, for instance, all the logic for how that works can be held by those entities — including a third entity may increase governance and control, but it may be antithesis to the microservice solution.

Martin Fowler’s coined this concept in his commentary on microservices. In it, he stated as thus:

“The microservice community favours an alternative approach: smart endpoints and dumb pipes. Applications built from microservices aim to be as decoupled and as cohesive as possible – they own their own domain logic and act more as filters in the classical Unix sense – receiving a request, applying logic as appropriate and producing a response. These are choreographed using simple RESTish protocols rather than complex protocols such as WS-Choreography or BPEL or orchestration by a central tool.”

To be clear, this doesn’t mean that no logic is located within the communication systems. The point is where the bulk of that logic resides. It’s one thing to have the “pipes” holding onto basic logic for managing asynchronous communication. Still, it’s a whole secondary thing to have them hold the complete logic for all communication and governance internally. Not only is it highly inefficient, but it may also be ineffective in actually facilitating communication. Lightweight logic systems can, in fact, be useful. Again, from the same commentary from Martin Fowler:

“The second approach in common use is messaging over a lightweight message bus. The infrastructure chosen is typically dumb (dumb as in acts as a message router only) – simple implementations such as RabbitMQ or ZeroMQ don’t do much more than provide a reliable asynchronous fabric – the smarts still live in the endpoints that are producing and consuming messages; in the services.”

This is really a solution that is more concerned with removing blockers than demanding a particular approach. The beauty of microservices lies in the freedom to adapt and change for different circumstances — adopting the concept of “smart endpoints and dumb pipes” simply allows that change and adaptation to be more fluid and independent of the communication controls and protocols more typical of centralized systems.

Conclusion

The best way to think about “smart endpoints and dumb pipes” is to think about where the logic exists. When you create dumb endpoints and smart pipes, you depend on the pipes for everything. You depend on the pipes to know where the data is coming from, where it’s going, and how it should be transmitted. You have centralized all communication power into a system of organization and governance. That’s not necessarily a bad thing in all cases — in secure data situations, you may very well need such a system — but it’s only truly appropriate in a handful of situations.

“Smart endpoints and dumb pipes” is an inversion of this principle. The microservices know what they’re doing, and if that’s true, why should you need to control their communication? If you’ve built out a robust microservice ecosystem, then you should be able to let them communicate over a system that is minimally controlling, with minimal logic built-in for core functions.

What do you think about this concept? Let us know below!

@ 4bda8a0e:f0aaec7e

Benefit of Self-Recording 3: Discovering versatility

Some self-insights can't be deduced through introspection in the armchair. They can only be discovered through observation while acting in the world. One thing you might discover through self-recording is that you are more versatile than you thought.

What may have been holding you back are abstract and context-free descriptions of yourself. We often describe ourselves in terms such as "I am" followed by "messy", "smart", "lazy", "undisciplined" or whatever it may be. Self-recording can expose some of these self-perceptions as inaccurate – or too vague to be true or false.

Any self-perception needs to be backed by concrete observations. Suppose someone wants to be more "assertive". This doesn't specify what to change. Only assertive behaviors can be changed; for example, saying "no" to certain requests. Patience is another example. Patience itself can't be trained. What can be trained is how long someone is willing to wait for a large reward, than a smaller reward in a shorter time. The next step is to note the context in which the behavior of interest occurs (or fails to occur). It's unlikely that you have problems saying "no" everywhere, to everyone, and every time. There are probably specific people, with specific requests, in certain environments, where you struggle with saying "no". Similarly, you may be used to waiting a long time for good things in some situations, but not in others.

Careful attention to concrete examples and context helps you identify things that can be changed. It can also end up making a mockery of any personality test you may have taken. Abstract and context-free self-descriptions are at best over-simplifications. At worst, they are fictions (which some people use to torture themselves on a daily basis).

Merely trying to remember the exact behavior and context is not a good strategy. Memory is selective, deteriorates with time, and can be influenced by our mood. Sometimes we even unconsciously fill in the blanks based on background expectations. When recalling images from a road trip in New Zealand, I've caught myself 'remembering' the car being on the right-hand side of the road. New Zealanders drive on the left-hand side. This false memory is likely due to having grown up with cars driving on the right side. Negative self-conceptions may also rush in to fill the gaps where you don't remember the context that might explain your behavior. For example, procrastination might be explained away as "lack of self-discipline". These fictions deprive you of the opportunity to analyze the incentives and constraints that were present at the time.

@ 338aedd4:eca97fff

This is a brief description of structural limitations that are stunting the internet’s music market, as well as what is needed to overcome them. This article explains the motivation behind the proposal for an open protocol for streaming (OPS) described here: https://github.com/ymilkessa/ops0

You are welcome to reach me to share your thoughts: iris.to/yoftinator

The existing music market

The current music market on the internet is what I will call the “platform model.” In this model, the market is composed of streaming platforms, each of which functions like an isolated marketplace.

Each streaming platform does all of the following under one roof.

1. Hosting content from artists.
2. Making all the business decisions in their marketplace.
   This includes setting subscription prices, running advertisements, and negotiating on shares of revenue with artists and record labels.
3. Generating revenue from users and advertisers.
4. Curating content for users, such as running the recommendation algorithms.
5. Running the standard client application. These become the primary interface with which users listen to music.
6. Serving client APIs. These allow for alternate user interfaces and use cases, but still function similarly to client applications in all other respects.

Limitations

The music market is highly inflexible under the platform model:

1. Artists have little say on the price of their work. They can only sit back and wait on how much revenue the streaming platforms have managed to gather, and negotiate on what portion of that goes to them.
2. The only business models or experiences available are the ones that the streaming platforms have decided to provide. For instance, I cannot subscribe to a single artist for a lower cost. Neither can I purchase “100 plays of Ed Shareen.” None of the streaming platforms have offered such deals. And the artists have no avenue for making such business models happen.
3. If you want to try new business models, you would need to build a whole new streaming platform from scratch and get artists to onboard onto your platform. Hence the cost of building new user experiences is needlessly high.

In short this system is actually holding back artists, users and developers from extracting more utility out of the internet.

Successes

Despite its limitations, the platform model has so far gained dominance for two reasons.

1. Streaming platforms have been largely successful with IP protection. Artists are now making money on the internet and not just being ripped off by it.
2. The business model employed by these platforms has so far garnered the most revenue that the music industry has ever gained (although it is still unclear how profitable the platforms themselves are, or how sustainable their business would be moving forward).

Explaining the platform model

Digital rights management is at the core of why the industry has gravitated to this model. As it turns out, this is the only feasible arrangement with which these services can protect artists’ IP, which is a crucial part of their business. By controlling both how music is streamed from servers and how it is decrypted on users’ devices, these companies can make it difficult for people to steal music off of their platform. But as a consequence, the same platforms need to handle practically every aspect of their own marketplace.

Note that the web APIs of these platforms do not impact this arrangement since they also have to be equally restrictive. For instance, only premium subscribers of Apple Music or Spotify can be the end users of any application that utilizes the respective API.

The Alternative: An Open Market Model

A much better alternative is one where artists and listeners can transact in whatever terms they choose with no barriers to making their transactions happen.

Here are the requirements that an open market model should satisfy.

1. Users are not fragmented across disjoint platforms. Instead, there is a standard protocol for streaming which is not limited to any one platform and which anyone can use to purchase and listen to music.
2. New business models and use cases can be built with minimal friction. Developers can simply follow predetermined specifications on how to pay for and access music for their applications.
3. It should have an effective mechanism for IP protection. Otherwise, this market would not be viable and would fall apart.

Requirements 1 and 2 are easily solvable by using a decentralized network like Nostr. My OPS proposal is a solution to requirement 3 and would make the open market model possible. Feel free to inspect the protocol: https://github.com/ymilkessa/ops0

@ a4a6b584:1e05b95b

"For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:11-12

Though God has always had a people, the New Testament Church started with Christ and His disciples and was empowered at Pentecost. Historically, there has always been a remnant of people who adhered to the truth of God's Word for their faith and practice. I am convinced that the very same body of truth which was once delivered must be contended for in every generation.

In every generation from Christ and His disciples to this present moment, there have been holy adherents to the truth of God's Word. This witness of history is a witness in their blood. I am a Baptist by conviction. I was not "Baptist-born." I became and remain a Baptist because of what I have discovered in the Word of God.

The Lord Jesus Christ left His church doctrine and ordinances. The ordinances are baptism and the Lord's Supper. These are the things He ordered us to do. They picture His death and remind us of Him and His return. He also left us a body of doctrine. This involves our belief and teaching. Our doctrine distinguishes us. It is all from the Bible.

No one can be forced to become a Baptist. Our records show that baptism was always administered to professing believers. Hence, we refer to baptism as believers' baptism.

Baptists are gospel-preaching people. They preached the gospel to me. The Lord Jesus said to the first-century church, "But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth ,, (Acts I :8). I am grateful to God to be a Baptist. I consider this to be New Testament Christianity. It is my joy to serve as the pastor of an independent Baptist church, preaching and teaching God's Word.

A Baptist recognizes the autonomy of the local church. There is no such thing as "The Baptist Church." The only Baptist headquarters that exists is in the local assembly of baptized believers. There are only local Baptist churches. \

When we say that the Bible is our sole authority, we are speaking of all the scriptures, the whole and its parts. We should preach the whole counsel of God. In the Bible we find the gospel-the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. We should proclaim the gospel because Jesus Christ said that we are to take the gospel message to every creature. When we open the sixty-six books of the Bible, we find more than the gospel. Of course, that scarlet thread of redemption runs through all the Bible, but the whole counsel of God must be proclaimed.

The Bible says in Romans 14:11-12, ''For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God. " Each human being must answer personally to God.

In our nation we hear people talk about religious tolerance. Religious tolerance is something created by government. It is a "gift" from government. Religious tolerance is something man has made. Soul liberty is something God established when He created us. We find a clear teaching of this in His Word. Soul liberty is a gift from God! God's Word says in Galatians 5:1, "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage."

Soul liberty does not rest upon the legal documents of our nation-it is rooted in the Word of God. This individual freedom of the soul is inherent in man's nature as God created him. Man is responsible for his choices, but he is free to choose. This conviction is at the core of Baptist beliefs.

This powerful declaration about our Baptist position was made by J.D. Freeman in 1905:

Our demand has been not simply for religious toleration, but religious liberty; not sufferance merely, but freedom; and that not for ourselves alone, but for all men. We did not stumble upon this doctrine. It inheres in the very essence of our belief. Christ is Lord of all.. .. The conscience is the servant only of God, and is not subject to the will of man. This truth has indestructible life. Crucify it and the third day it will rise again. Bury it in the sepulcher and the stone will be rolled away, while the keepers become as dead men .... Steadfastly refusing to bend our necks under the yoke of bondage, we have scrupulously withheld our hands from imposing that yoke upon others .... Of martyr blood our hands are clean. We have never invoked the sword of temporal power to aid the sword of the Spirit. We have never passed an ordinance inflicting a civic disability on any man because of his religious views, be he Protestant or Papist, Jew, or Turk, or infidel. In this regard there is no blot on our escutcheon (family crest).

Remember that, when we are talking about individual soul liberty and the relationship of the church and the state, in America the Constitution does not place the church over the state or the state over the church. Most importantly, Scripture places them side by side, each operating independently of the other. This means there is freedom in the church and freedom in the state. Each is sovereign within the sphere of the authority God has given to each of them (Matthew 22:21).

Read carefully this statement made by Charles Spurgeon, the famous English preacher, concerning Baptist people:

We believe that the Baptists are the original Christians. We did not commence our existence at the Reformation, we were reformers before Luther or Calvin were born; we never came from the Church of Rome, for we were never in it, but we have an unbroken line up to the apostles themselves. We have always existed from the very days of Christ, and our principles, sometimes veiled and forgotten, like a river which may travel underground for a little season, have always had honest and holy adherents. Persecuted alike by Romanists and Protestants of almost every sect, yet there has never existed a government holding Baptist principles which persecuted others; nor, I believe, any body of Baptists ever held it to be right to put the consciences of others under the control of man. We have ever been ready to suffer, as our martyrologies will prove, but we are not ready to accept any help from the State, to prostitute the purity of the Bride of Christ to any alliance with overnment, and we wil never make the Church, although the Queen, the despot over the consciences of men.

The New Park Street Pulpit, Volume VII · Page 225

This a marvelous statement about Baptist beliefs. I am rather troubled when I see so many people who claim to be Baptists who do not understand why they are Baptists. We should be able to defend our position and do it biblically. lf we are people who know and love the Lord and His Word and if the Bible is our sole authority for faith and practice, then we have no reason to be ashamed of the position we take. May God not only help us to take this position, but to take it with holy boldness and cotnpassion. May He help us to be able to take His Word in hand and heart and defend what we believe to a lost and dying world.

So much of what we have to enjoy in our country can be credited to Baptist people. Any honest student of American history will agree that the Virginia Baptists were almost solely responsible for the First Amendment being added to our Constitution providing the freedom to worship God as our conscience dictates.

We have a country that has been so influenced that we do not believe it is right to exercise any control or coercion of any kind over the souls of men. Where did this conviction come from? We find it in the Bible, but someone imparted it to the Founding Fathers. It became the law of the land, and it should remain the law of the land. We need to understand it. It comes out of the clear teaching of God's Word concerning the subject of soul liberty.

There are many historic places there where people were martyred for their faith, giving their lives for what they believed. The religious persecution came as a result of the laws of the land. Although many Baptists have been martyred, you will never find Baptist people persecuting anyone anywhere for his faith, no matter what his faith may be.

There are many denominations that teach the Scriptures are the infallible Word of God, God is the creator of heaven and earth, man is a fallen creature and must be redeemed by the blood of Christ, salvation is the free offer of eternal Iife to those who receive it and eternal helI awaits those who reject it, the Lord's Day is a day of worship, and the only time for man to be made right with God is in this lifetime. There are certainly other commonly held teachings, but there are certain Baptist distinctive. Often an acrostic using the word BAPTISTS is used to represent these Baptist distinctive.

• B is for biblical authority. The Bible is the sole authority for our faith and practice.

• A for the autonomy of the local church. Every church we find in the New Testament was a self-governing church with only Christ as the head.

• P represents the priesthood of believers and the access we have to God through Jesus Christ.

• T for the two church officers-pastors and deacons. We find these officers in the New Testament.

• I for individual soul liberty. Most people, when asked, say that the sole authority of the Scripture in our faith and practice is the single, most important distinctive of our faith. However, if we did not have individual soul liberty, we could not come to the convictions we have on all other matters.

• S for a saved church membership.

Personal Accountability to God

Renowned Baptist leader, Dr. E.Y. Mullins, summarized our Baptist position in these words. He wrote:

The biblical significance of the Baptist is the right of private interpretation of and obedience to the Scriptures. The significance of the Baptist in relation to the individual is soul freedom. The ecclesiastical significance of the Baptist is a regenerated church membership and the equality and priesthood of believers. The political significance of the Baptist is the separation of church and state. But as comprehending all the above particulars, as a great and aggressive force in Christian history, as distinguished from all others and standing entirely alone, the doctrine of the soul's competency in religion under God is the distinctive significance of the Baptists.

We find this accountability in the opening verses of God's Word. When God created man, He created man capable of giving a personal account of himself to God. God did not create puppets; He created people. He gave man the right to choose. That is why we find the man Adam choosing to sin and to disobey God in Genesis chapter three. Of his own volition he chose to sin and disobey God. Genesis I :27 says, "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. " We were made in God's image, and when God made us in His image, He made us with the ability to choose.

It is not right to try to force one's religion or belief upon another individual. This does not mean, however, that he can be a Christian by believing anything he wishes to believe, because Jesus Christ said that there is only one way to heaven. He said in John 14:6, "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." He is the only way to God. The only way of salvation is the Lord Jesus Christ.

In this age of tolerance, people say that nothing is really wrong. The same people who say that any way of believing is right will not accept the truth that one belief can be the only way that is right. You may believe anything you choose, but God has declared that there is only one way to Him and that is through His Son, Jesus Christ. He is the only way of salvation- that is why He suffered and died for our sins. The only way to know God is through His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ.

Someone is certain to ask, "Who are you to declare that everyone else's religion is wrong?" We are saying that everyone ~as ~ right to choose his own way, but God has clearly taught us in His Word that there is only one way to Him. The Lord Jesus says in John 10:9, "I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture."

No human being is going to live on this earth without being sinned against by others. Many children are sinned against greatly by their own parents. However, we cannot go through life blaming others for the person we are, because God has made us in such a way that we have an individual accountability to God. This comes out of our soul liberty and our right to choose and respond to things in a way that God would have us espond to them. God has made us in His image. Again, He did not make us puppets or robots; He made us people, created in His image with the ability to choose our own way.

Remember, "For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God" (Romans 14:11- 12). We are responsible because we have direct access to God. God has given us the Word of God, the Holy Spirit, and access to the Throne by the merit of Jesus Christ. We, therefore? must answer personally to God at the judgment seat because God communicates to us directly.

People do not like to be held personally accountable for their actions. The truth of the Word of God is that every individual is personally accountable to God. In other words, you are going to meet God in judgment some day. I am going to meet God in judgment some day. All of us are going to stand before the Lord some day and answer to Him. We are individually accountable to God. Since the state cannot answer for us to God, it has no right to dictate our conscience.

We live in a country where there are many false religions. As Baptist people, we defend the right of anyone in our land to worship as he sees fit to worship. This is unheard of in most of the world. If a man is a Moslem, I do not agree with his Islamic religion, but I defend his right to worship as he sees fit to worship. The teaching of the Catholic Church declares that salvation comes through Mary, but this is not the teaching of the Bible. We zealously proclaim the truth, but we must also defend the right of people to worship as they choose to worship. Why? Because individual soul liberty is a gift from God to every human being.

Since the Bible teaches individual soul liberty and personal accountability to God, then it is a truth that will endure to all generations. To be sure, Baptists believe the Bible is the sole authority for faith and practice (II Timothy 3:16-17; Matthew 15:9; I John 2:20, 21 , 27) and the Bible clearly teaches that no church or government or power on earth has the right to bind a man's conscience. The individual is personally accountable to God. Hence, we reject the teaching of infant baptism and all doctrine that recognizes people as members of a church before they give evidence of personal repentance toward God and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.

The famous Baptist, John Bunyan is the man who gave us Pilgrim's Progress. This wonderful book was planned during Bunyan's prison experience and written when he was released. The trial of John Bunyan took place on October 3, 1660. John Bunyan spent twelve years in jail for his convictions about individual soul liberty, failure to attend the Church of England, and for preaching the Word of God. During his trial, Bunyan stood before Judge Wingate who was interested in hearing John Bunyan state his case. Judge Wingate said, "In that case, then, this court would be profoundly interested in your response to them."

Part of John Bunyan's response follows:

Thank you, My 'lord. And may I say that I am grateful for the opportunity to respond. Firstly, the depositions speak the truth. I have never attended services in the Church of England, nor do I intend ever to do so. Secondly, it is no secret that I preach the Word of God whenever, wherever, and to whomever He pleases to grant me opportunity to do so. Having said that, My 'lord, there is a weightier issue that I am constrained to address. I have no choice but to acknowledge my awareness of the law which I am accused of transgressing. Likewise, I have no choice but to confess my auilt in my transgression of it. As true as these things are, I must affirm that I neiher regret breaking the law, nor repent of having broken it. Further, I must warn you that I have no intention in future of conforming to it. It is, on its face, an unjust law, a law against which honorable men cannot shrink from protesting. In truth, My 'lord, it violates an infinitely higher law- the right of every man to seek God in his own way, unhindered by any temporal power. That, My 'lord, is my response.

Remember that Bunyan was responding as to why he would not do all that he was doing for God within the confines of the Church of England. The transcription goes on to say:

Judge Wingate: This court would remind you, sir, that we are not here to debate the merits of the law. We are here to determine if you are, in fact, guilty of violating it. John Bunyan: Perhaps, My 'lord, that is why you are here, but it is most certainly not why I am here. I am here because you compel me to be here. All I ask is to be left alone to preach and to teach as God directs me. As, however, I must be here, I cannot fail to use these circumstances to speak against what I know to be an unjust and odious edict. Judge Wingate: Let me understand you. You are arguing that every man has a right, given him by Almighty God, to seek the Deity in his own way, even if he chooses without the benefit of the English Church? John Bunyan: That is precisely what I am arguing, My 'lord. Or without benefit of any church. Judge Wingate: Do you know what you are saying? What of Papist and Quakers? What of pagan Mohammedans? Have these the right to seek God in their own misguided way? John Bunyan: Even these, My 'lord. Judge Wingate: May I ask if you are articularly sympathetic to the views of these or other such deviant religious societies? John Bunyan: I am not, My 'lord. Judge Wingate: Yet, you affirm a God-given right to hold any alien religious doctrine that appeals to the warped minds of men? John Bunyan: I do, My'lord. Judge Wingate: I find your views impossible of belief And what of those who, if left to their own devices, would have no interest in things heavenly? Have they the right to be allowed to continue unmolested in their error? John Bunyan: It is my fervent belief that they do, My'lord. Judge Wingate: And on what basis, might r ask. can you make such rash affirmations? John Bunyan: On the basis, My 'lord, that a man's religious views- or lack of them- are matters between his conscience and his God, and are not the business of the Crown, the Parliament, or even, with all due respect, My 'lord, of this court. However much I may be in disagreement with another man's sincerely held religious beliefs, neither I nor any other may disallo his right to hold those beliefs. No man's right in these affairs are . secure if every other man's rights are not equally secure.

I do not know of anyone who could have expressed the whole idea of soul liberty in the words of man any more clearly than Bunyan stated in 1660. Every man can seek God as he pleases. This means that we cannot force our religious faith or teaching on anyone. It means clearly that no one can be coerced into being a Baptist and believing what we believe. It means that we can do no arm-twisting, or anything of that sort, to make anyone believe what we believe. Every man has been created by God with the ability to choose to follow God or to follow some other god.

Personal accountability to God is a distinctive of our faith. It is something we believe, and out of this distinctive come other distinctives that we identify with as Baptist people.

The Priesthood of Every Believer

The priesthood of the believer means that every believer can go to God through the merit of Jesus Christ. Christ and Christ alone is the only way to God. All of us who have trusted Christ as Saviour enjoy the glorious privilege of the priesthood of the believer and can access God through the merits of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

The Bible says in I Timothy 2: 1-6,

I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men,· for kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour,· who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

Take special note of verse five, "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus."

Any man, anywhere in this world can go to God through the Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Peter 2:9 says, "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal pn~ • thood , an . holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should. shew forth the praises of hzm who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light. "

Christians have access to God. You can personally talk to God. You can take your needs to the Lord. Whatever your needs are, you can take those needs to the Lord. You, as an individual Christian, can go to God through the Lord Jesus Christ, your High Priest who "ever liveth to make intercession" for you (Hebrews 7:25).

We have no merit of our own. We do not accumulate merit. People may make reference to a time of meritorious service someone has rendered, but we cannot build up "good works" that get us through to God. Each day, we must come before God as needy sinners approaching Him through the finished work of Christ and Christ alone.

The Bible teaches the personal accountability of every human being to God. We cannot force our religion on anyone or make anyone a believer. We cannot force someone to be a Christian. Think of how wrong it is to take babies and allow them later in life to think they have become Christians by an act of infant baptism. Yes, they have a right to practice infant baptism, but we do not believe this is biblical because faith cannot be forced or coerced.

There are places in the world where the state is under a religion. There are places in the world where religion is under the state-the state exercises control over the faith of people. This is not taught in the Bible. Then, there are countries like ours where the church and the state operate side by side.

Throughout history, people who have identified with Baptist distinctives have stood as guardians of religious liberty. At the heart of this liberty is what we refer to as ndividual soul liberty. I am grateful to be a Baptist.

The Power of Influence Where does this teaching of the priesthood of every believer and our personal accountability to God lead us? It leads us to realize the importance of the power of influence. This is the tool God has given us. I want to give you an Old Testament example to illustrate the matter of influence.

Judges 21 :25 tells us, "In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes."

In the days of the judges, every man did what was right in his own eyes with no fixed point of reference.

God's Word continues to describe this time of judges in Ruth 1:1, ''Now it came to pass in the days when the judges ruled, that there was a famine in the land. " God begins to tell us about a man named Elimelech, his wife Naomi, and his sons. He brings us to the beautiful love story of Ruth and Boaz. God tells us that at the same time in which the judges ruled, when there was anarchy in the land, this beautiful love stor of Boaz and Ruth took place.

This story gives us interesting insight on the responsibility of the Christian and the church. In the midst of everything that is going on, we are to share the beautiful love story of the Lord Jesus Christ and His bride. We need to tell people about the Saviour.

The same truth is found throughout the Word of God. Philippians 2:15 states, "That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world. "

We are "in the midst ofa crooked and p erverse nation." This is why the Lord Jesus said in Matthew 5:16, "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven. " Let your light shine!

The more a church becomes like the world, the less influence it is going to have in the world. Preaching ceases, and churches only have diolauges. Singing that is sacred is taken out and the worlds music comes in. All revrence is gone. What so many are attempting to do in order to build up their ministry is actualy what will cause the demise of their ministry. We will never make a difference without being willing to be differnt, Being different is not the goal. Christ is the goal, and He makes us different.

Remember, we cannot force people to become Christians or force our faith on people. It is not right to attempt to violate another man's will; he must choose of his own volition to trust Christ or reject Christ. When we understand this, then we understand the powerful tool of influence. We must live Holy Spirit-filled, godly lives and be what God wants us to be. We must be lights in a dark world as we live in the midst of a crooked generation. The only tool we have to use is influence, not force. As we separate ourselves to God and live godly lives, only then do we have a testimony.

Separation to God and from the world is not the enemy of evangelism; it cais the essential of evangelism. There can be no evangelism without separation to God and from the world because we have no other tool to use. We cannot force people to believe what we believe to be the truth. They must choose of their own will. We must so identify with the Lord Jesus in His beauty, glory, and holiness that He will be lifted up, and people will come to Him

The more a church becomes like the world, the less influence it is going to have in the world. Preaching ceases, and churches only have dialogue. Singing that is sacred is taken out, and the world's music comes in. All reverence is gone. What so many are attempting to do in order to build up their ministry is actually what will cause the demise of their ministry. We will never make a difference without being willing to be different. It is Christ who makes us different. Being different is not the goal. Christ is the goal, and He makes us different.

Remember, we cannot force people to become Christians or force our faith on people. It is not right to attempt to violate another man's will; he must choose of his own volition to trust Christ or reject Christ. When we understand this, then we understand the powerful tool of influence. We must live Holy Spirit-filled, godly lives and be what God wants us to be. We must be lights in a dark world as we live in the midst of a crooked generation. The only tool we have to use is influence, not force. As we separate ourselves to God and live godly lives, only then do we have a testimony.

Separation to God and from the world is not the enemy of evangelism; it is the essential of evangelism. There can be no evangelism without separation to God and from the world because we have no other tool to use. We cannot force people to believe what we believe to be the truth. They must choose of their own will. We must so identify with the Lord Jesus in His beauty, glory, and holiness that He will be lifted up, and people will come to Him.

As this world becomes increasingly worse, the more off-thewall and ridiculous we will appear to an unbelieving world. The temptation will come again and again for us to simply cave in.

When one finds people with sincerely held Baptist distinctives, he finds those people have a passion for going in the power of the Holy Spirit, obeying Christ, preaching the gospel to every creature. I am grateful to God to say, "I am a Baptist."

Baptists know it is because of what we find in the Bible about soul freedom, personal accountability, and the priesthood of every believer that we must use the power of Spirit-filled influence to win the lost to Christ. If we disobey Christ by conforming to the world, we lose our influence.

May the Lord help us to be unashamed to bear His reproach and be identified with our Lord Jesus Christ.

The Way of Salvation

Do you know for sure that if you died today you would go to Heaven?

1. Realize that God loves you

God loves you and has a plan for your life. "For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him, should not perish but have everlasting life" (John 3:16 ).

2. The Bible says that all men are sinners

Our sins have separated us from God. "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). God made man in His own image. He gave man the ability to choose right from wrong. We choose to sin. Our sins separate us from God.

3. God's word also says that sin must be paid for

"For the wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23 ). Wages means payment. The payment of our sin is death and hell, separation from God forever. If we continue in our sin, we shall die without Christ and be without God forever.

4. The good news is that Christ paid for our sins

All our sins were laid on Christ on the cross. He paid our sin debt for us. The Lord Jesus Christ died on the cross, and He arose from the dead. He is alive forevermore. "But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8).

5. We must personally pray and recieve Christ by faith as our saviour

The Bible says, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved" (Romans 10:13 ).

Lets review for a moment

1. Realize That God Loves You - John 3: 1
2. All are sinners - Romans 3:21
3. Sin Must Be Paid For - Romans 6:23
4. Christ paid for our sins - Romans 5:8
5. We Must Personally Pray and Receive Christ as Our Saviour - Romans 10:13
6. Pray and recieve Christ as your saviour

Lord, I know that I am a sinner. If I died today I would not go to heaven. Forgive my sins and be my Saviour. Help me live for You from this day forward. In Jesus' name, Amen.

The Bible says, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved" (Romans 10:13 ).

~navluc-latmes

@ 57fe4c4a:c3a0271f

👥 Authors: moonsettler ( nostr:npub1nt4g4lddyzlky5q9m93tfa6fqpjmhsvnyfkjfsdqf33s8ax7jcmswjd2m3 )

📅 Messages Date: 2023-07-26

✉️ Message Count: 1

📚 Total Characters in Messages: 3532

Messages Summaries

✉️ Message by moonsettler on 26/07/2023: The sender is discussing a protocol that incorporates 2FA authentication and blind signing, but there are concerns about potential attacks.

Follow nostr:npub15g7m7mrveqlpfnpa7njke3ccghmpryyqsn87vg8g8eqvqmxd60gqmx08lk for full threads

@ 57fe4c4a:c3a0271f

📝 Summary: The author suggests a solution to the blinding problem in a signature protocol and asks for feedback. Tom Trevethan approves of the scheme, stating that it effectively blinds the challenge without modifying the aggregated pubkey. He also mentions that the receiver of a statecoin would need to verify signatures and transactions.

👥 Authors: • Tom Trevethan ( nostr:npub1axshsyxsl3vasj4z9549rvwdvhjmh52fw0ayj3ghtmdezx8cnuxqlwyw7n ) • moonsettler ( nostr:npub1nt4g4lddyzlky5q9m93tfa6fqpjmhsvnyfkjfsdqf33s8ax7jcmswjd2m3 )

📅 Messages Date: 2023-07-26

✉️ Message Count: 2

📚 Total Characters in Messages: 2418

Messages Summaries

✉️ Message by moonsettler on 26/07/2023: The author proposes a solution to the blinding issue in a signature protocol and seeks feedback on its correctness.

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 26/07/2023: The scheme for blinding the challenge works well and doesn't require modifying the aggregated pubkey. The receiver of a statecoin would verify the signatures and transactions.

Follow nostr:npub15g7m7mrveqlpfnpa7njke3ccghmpryyqsn87vg8g8eqvqmxd60gqmx08lk for full threads

@ 57fe4c4a:c3a0271f

📝 Summary: A version of 2-of-2 Schnorr Musig2 is being implemented for statechains, with the server fully blinded. Concerns are raised about the vulnerability of the scheme's single R per party. The discussion revolves around the security of blind MuSig schemes, potential attacks on nonces and challenges, and the need for proof of knowledge of signing keys. Alternative approaches for blind Schnorr signatures are proposed.

👥 Authors: • Andrew Poelstra ( nostr:npub1ae27kq6z802dkqw4ey4dgdx493szm8dpmcm76d7vt0ma9gf6fj4svz5t04 ) • AdamISZ ( nostr:npub1nv7tjpn2g8tvt8qfq5ccyl00ucfcu98ch998sq4g5xp65vy6fc4sykqw2t ) • Erik Aronesty ( nostr:npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0 ) • Tom Trevethan ( nostr:npub1axshsyxsl3vasj4z9549rvwdvhjmh52fw0ayj3ghtmdezx8cnuxqlwyw7n ) • ZmnSCPxj ( nostr:npub1g5zswf6y48f7fy90jf3tlcuwdmjn8znhzaa4vkmtxaeskca8hpss23ms3l ) • Jonas Nick ( nostr:npub1at3pav59gkeqz9kegzqhk2v4j4r435x42ytf23pxs8crt74tuc8s2y3z5a )

📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-07-24 to 2023-07-26

✉️ Message Count: 20

📚 Total Characters in Messages: 58102

Messages Summaries

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 24/07/2023: A version of 2-of-2 Schnorr Musig2 is being implemented for statechains, where the server is fully blinded and does not learn certain information. The security relies on the server reporting the number of partial signatures generated and verifying the signatures client-side. The protocol operates by generating private and public keys, aggregating the public keys, generating nonces, computing challenges, and creating the final signature. In the case of blinding for party 1, key aggregation and nonce aggregation are performed by party 2, and party 1 does not learn the final signature or the message being signed.

✉️ Message by ZmnSCPxj on 24/07/2023: MuSig2 requires multiple R points, preventing certain attacks. The recipient questions if the scheme's single R per party is vulnerable.

✉️ Message by Erik Aronesty on 24/07/2023: The text discusses the implementation of a version of 2-of-2 Schnorr Musig2 for statechains, where the server is fully blinded. The security relies on the server reporting the number of partial signatures generated and verifying the full set of signatures client-side. The protocol involves generating private and public keys, aggregating the public keys, and signing a message using nonces.

✉️ Message by Jonas Nick on 24/07/2023: The text discusses concerns about the proposed scheme for blind music and suggests an alternative approach that may be worth exploring.

✉️ Message by Erik Aronesty on 24/07/2023: The email discusses the potential vulnerabilities of a proposed scheme and suggests an alternative approach that may be worth exploring.

✉️ Message by Jonas Nick on 24/07/2023: The meaning and connection between "posk" and the attack remains unclear and undefined.

✉️ Message by Jonas Nick on 24/07/2023: Party 1 is unable to determine the final value of (R, s1+s2) or m, but a blinding step may be missing, allowing the server to scan the blockchain for signatures and compute corresponding hashes to check for a match.

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 24/07/2023: The current statechain protocol requires the sender to sign the statechain with their public key, preventing rogue key attacks and ensuring server cooperation for spending.

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 24/07/2023: The sender acknowledges that the full scheme should have multiple nonces and compute b, but it doesn't change the approach to blinding.

✉️ Message by AdamISZ on 24/07/2023: Wagner's attack is discussed in the conversation, and it is suggested that using the 3rd round of MuSig1 can help avoid it. There are also discussions about blind signing schemes and the need for proof of a well-formed signing request.

✉️ Message by Erik Aronesty on 25/07/2023: The discussion is about the security of the blind MuSig scheme and the potential vulnerabilities it may have.

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 25/07/2023: The v=2 nonces signing protocol of musig2 prevents the Wagner attack. The challenge value c must be blinded from the server to prevent signature determination.

✉️ Message by Erik Aronesty on 26/07/2023: The author suggests that whenever a public key is transmitted, it should come with a "proof of secret key" to prevent vulnerabilities.

✉️ Message by Andrew Poelstra on 26/07/2023: POSK (proof of secret key) is not a perfect solution for preventing rogue key attacks and has logistical difficulties in implementation.

✉️ Message by Jonas Nick on 26/07/2023: Attacks on nonces and challenges cannot be prevented by proving knowledge of the signing key (proof of possession, PoP).

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 26/07/2023: Proving knowledge of the r values used in generating each R can prevent the Wagner attack, not signing or secret keys.

✉️ Message by Erik Aronesty on 26/07/2023: The email discusses attacks on nonces and challenges in cryptography and the need for proof of knowledge of signing keys to prevent them.

✉️ Message by Tom Trevethan on 24/07/2023: The sender is discussing with Jonas the need for a method to blind the value of c in order to prevent the server from learning the value of m.

✉️ Message by Jonas Nick on 26/07/2023: Blind Schnorr signatures can solve the issue of blinding, but not the problem of client-controlled forged signatures. Recent work proposes alternative approaches for blind Schnorr signatures.

✉️ Message by AdamISZ on 26/07/2023: The protocol described in the text is an interesting idea for incorporating 2FA authentication into blind signing. However, there may be vulnerabilities in the protocol that need to be addressed.

Follow nostr:npub15g7m7mrveqlpfnpa7njke3ccghmpryyqsn87vg8g8eqvqmxd60gqmx08lk for full threads

@ 57fe4c4a:c3a0271f

📝 Summary: Blinded paths in the Lightning Network may harm privacy and decentralization by allowing only "compliant" nodes to access destinations. This could result in routing through regulated hubs, affecting payment reliability and sender privacy. Concerns arise that lightning "chain analysis" firms could influence businesses to adopt this approach, further compromising privacy.

👥 Authors: • Bastien TEINTURIER ( nostr:npub17fjkngg0s0mfx4uhhz6n4puhflwvrhn2h5c78vdr5xda4mvqx89swntr0s ) • Ben Carman ( nostr:npub17lts233cksw942zaqq8kkkgrc8hn9pfzgdyrce28nrf2vx49q7wq3c7hwm )

📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-07-25 to 2023-07-26

✉️ Message Count: 2

📚 Total Characters in Messages: 6270

Messages Summaries

✉️ Message by Ben Carman on 25/07/2023: Blinded paths in the Lightning Network can have a downside for privacy and decentralization, as they can enforce that only "compliant" nodes can reach a destination. This could lead to routing only through large regulated hubs, hurting payment reliability and sender side privacy. There is concern that lightning "chain analysis" companies could pressure businesses into implementing this.

✉️ Message by Bastien TEINTURIER on 26/07/2023: Blinded paths in the Lightning Network can potentially lead to a loss of privacy and decentralization. They could enforce that payments only go through "compliant" nodes, bypassing smaller routing nodes. This could also compromise sender-side privacy.

Follow nostr:npub1j3t00t9hv042ktszhk8xpnchma60x5kz4etemnslrhf9e9wavywqf94gll for full threads

@ 0e649f32:8a33b33b

Fite 4 Liberty is a place for lovers of Liberty to hear about amazing people in the Liberty Movement and what they are working on. With a mix of updates, interviews, and live shows; there's a little something for everybody!Twice a week David Fite sits down with Politicians, Entrepreneurs, and Activists to discuss the ways they are "Fite-ing" for Liberty and how others can do the same.

David Fite Vice President at Kraften Capital Political Consultant and Entrepreneur fighting to make people’s lives easier whether that’s through simplified laws, low cost financial services, or entheogen access. Cedarville University Business Administration and Management, General

Richard Blank is an Entrepreneur and CEO of Costa Rica's Call Center who built his company and wealth from the ground up. He joins the Fite to talk about financial independence and how it is the truest form of freedom we can experience today.

Richard’s vision quest journey is filled with twists and turns. When he was 27 years old, he relocated to Costa Rica to train employees for one of the larger call centers in San Jose. With a mix of motivational public speaking style backed by tactful and appropriate rhetoric, Richard shared his knowledge and trained over 10 000 bilingual telemarketers.

Richard Blank has the largest collection of restored American Pinball machines and antique Rockola Jukeboxes in Central America making gamification a strong part of CCC culture. Richard Blank is the Chief Executive Officer for Costa Rica’s Call Center since 2008.

Mr. Richard Blank holds a bachelors degree in Communication and Spanish from the University of Arizona and a certificate of language proficiency from the University of Sevilla, Spain. A Keynote speaker for Philadelphia's Abington High School 68th National Honors Society induction ceremony. In addition, inducted into the 2023 Hall of Fame for Business. Giving back to Abington Senior High School is very important to Mr. Blank. As such, he endows a scholarship each year for students that plan on majoring in a world language at the university level.

Costa Rica’s Call Center (CCC) is a state of the art BPO telemarketing outsource company located in the capital city of San Jose, Costa Rica. Our main focus has been, and will always be to personally train each and every Central America call center agent so that we may offer the highest quality of outbound and inbound telemarketing solutions and bilingual customer service to small and medium sized international companies, entrepreneurs as well as fortune 500 companies.

https://costaricascallcenter.com/en/outbound-bpo-campaigns/

RichardBlank #CostaRica #CallCenter #Outsourcing #Telemarketing #BPO #Sales #Entrepreneur #B2B #Business #Podcast #Leadgeneration #Appointmentsetting #fite4libertypodcast

https://youtu.be/tNZn9UFCreA

https://youtu.be/QgMbyd_btDk

@ 884f5d1d:1ed306f6

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit

eprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur? At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere

@ 648c0f53:96de86a6

You're at your computer, browsing, writing, networking, gaming, or whatever it is you do.

A notification in your lower right corner of the screen informs you that your PC is finally eligible to install the latest Windows 11 build, and it is also free! That's great - no need to pay those 80 bucks for something that, let's be honest, you searched for product keys on sketchy websites. Yeah yeah, you got a virus by clicking on that phantom download button, but who cares, Avast took care of that. But now that problem no longer arises since you didn't pay money to Microsoft for Windows 11!

As you revel in the new shiny UI, centered buttons, and Microsoft Office suite at your fingertips, you start to question the security of it all. But you can feel something is wrong. Is it okay to run your favorite software wallet or companion app for your hardware wallet on an OS that you know was made by Microsoft? How secure is it? Can someone detect me when I'm writing down my private keys into my wallet? Is something monitoring my connections? Do they know to whom I send my sats to? Is it sate to store personal informations and documents on this PC?

In the depths of your mind, the big "why" lingers: why didn't I pay for this? Yeah, why didn't you pay for it? Then you think of a mantra:

Oh, so is Windows 11 free because Microsoft wants a capillary diffusion of this OS? Why? Why not gain profit from it? What is their intention? I don't trust such a gigantic and powerful company that has the political reach that Microsoft has.

Bitcoiners taught me another cool mantra:

As you dive deeper, seeking transparency, you head to Microsoft's GitHub page to inspect Windows source code But to your disappointment, the treasure trove of information remains undiscovered. Microsoft does not publish their beloved product's source code.

This isn't right.

Alright, you're now fed up, you are bitcoiner goddammit! You require that key components of your digital life, like the OS, should be free, freely available and free.

An old memory in the back of your mind surfaces in front of you. Some weird IT guy at you old job talked to you about some weird stuff, this ~~Linux~~ GNU/Linux. He said it is FOSS and everybody can contribute. It was 2006, all this tech mambo-jumbo was not your strong suit. You somewhat read about Linux, but what the hell is FOSS, what's a GNU and why would you care? To be fair now you know about private keys, public keys, UTXOs, ~~hardware wallets~~ signing devices! You also now know about nsec, npub, relays and NIPS! All the weirdest stuff! It's time man, you are now the weird guy, embrace the weirdness, you finally decided to approach Linux!

...to be continued...

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

Today, I will address the glorious revolution of cryptocurrencies and how, in an unexpected turn of events, the individual finally triumphed over the traditional financial sector.

The evolution of money is, in all respects, a tortuous narrative of the struggle for power and control. The poor common citizen, no matter what the era, has always been on the sidelines, a slave to the economy and financial forces. However, friends, the human saga is anything but predictable, and from time to time, a David arises to slay a Goliath.

Our ancestors, primitive dreamers, traded goods and services in an unbalanced dance called barter. Men often had to crush their spines to find a fair balance, a feat rarely achieved. But times were changing and with the invention of coins, a bit of dignity was restored. But, more was needed.

I will not bore you with the complex sequence of events that brought us here. I will get straight to the point. Coins, banknotes, checks, credit cards, were all progressive steps on the path of financial evolution. But 2009 came around, and a silent revolution began to unfold: Bitcoin emerged.

My emphasis, ladies and gentlemen, is not so much on the cryptocurrency itself, but on the idea behind it. The idea that, despite the unparalleled power of major financial institutions and governments, the individual could regain control. In its rawest form, Bitcoin and subsequent cryptocurrencies represent a challenge to conventional narratives of monetary control, restoring power to the people. Its decentralized nature signifies not just freedom, but also responsibility.

In this new financial world, you are your own bank. No one else controls your money. Ensure that your private keys are safe, and you will have total autonomy over your finances.

Isn't this the kind of freedom that our ancestors dreamed of? Wasn't this the fight they fought, the right to have complete control over their own efforts and earnings? I would say so. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies represent a threat to the status quo and may well be the potential tool for a truly free society. But, as we must remember, with great power comes great responsibility.

It is up to us all to never forget the reasons for this invention, this idea, this utopia, and to protect and propagate its message.

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

Hoje, vou abordar a gloriosa revolução das criptomoedas e como, em uma volta inusitada dos eventos, o indivíduo finalmente levou a melhor sobre o setor financeiro tradicional.

A evolução do dinheiro é, em tudo, uma narrativa tortuosa da luta pelo poder e controle. O pobre cidadão comum, não importa qual era a época, sempre encontrou-se às margens, escravo da economia e das forças financeiras. Mas amigos, a saga humana é tudo menos previsível, e de tempos em tempos, um David surge para abater um Golias.

Nossos ancestrais, sonhadores primitivos, trocavam bens e serviços em uma dança desequilibrada chamada escambo. Muitas vezes, os homens tinham que amassar a espinha para encontrar um justo equilíbrio, o que raramente acontecia. Mas os tempos estavam mudando e, com a invenção das moedas, um pouco de dignidade foi restaurada. Mas era necessário mais.

Não vou aborrecer você com a sequência complexa dos eventos que nos trouxe até aqui. Vou direto ao assunto. Moedas, papel-moeda, cheques, cartões de crédito, todos foram passos progressivos no caminho da evolução financeira. Mas veio 2009, e uma revolução silenciosa começou a se desenrolar: o Bitcoin surgiu.

Minha ênfase, senhoras e senhores, não é tanto na criptomoeda em si, mas na ideia por trás dela. A ideia de que, apesar do poder sem paralelo das grandes instituições financeiras e governamentais, o indivíduo poderia retomar o controle. Na sua forma mais crua, o Bitcoin e as criptomoedas subsequentes apresentam uma afronta às narrativas típicas do controle monetário, restaurando o poder ao povo. Sua natureza descentralizada não significa apenas liberdade, mas também responsabilidade.

Nesse novo mundo financeiro, você é seu próprio banco. Ninguém controla seu dinheiro além de você. Se assegure que suas chaves privadas estão seguras, e você terá total autonomia sobre suas finanças.

Não é este o ideal de liberdade que nossos antepassados sonharam? Não foi essa a luta pela qual eles lutaram, o direito de ter controle total sobre seus próprios esforços e ganhos? Eu diria que sim. O Bitcoin e outras criptomoedas apresentam uma ameaça ao status quo e podem ser a ferramenta potencial para uma sociedade verdadeiramente livre. Mas, como temos que lembrar, com grande poder vem grande responsabilidade.

Cabe-nos a todos nunca esquecer o porquê desta invenção, desta ideia, desta utopia, e protejer e propagar a sua mensagem.

@ 5afa711a:eae0d7b8

A year and a half ago, I started noticing my belly was getting out of control. I then stepped on a scale and it showed 113 kg (250 lbs). I felt contempt for myself, I had never let myself go this much before. I was always struggling with my weight, but looking back, I think a lot of people were just projecting their own self-hatred onto me, which lead me to thinking of myself as just the fat guy, but that's a different topic altogether.

So I decided to do something. I pulled myself up by my bootstraps, got out my notebook (a physical one, call me old fashioned) and started weighing every food article I intended to eat like a maniac.

This is the CICO (Calories In, Calories Out) method. I had once lost 15 kg (33 lbs) back when I was younger with this method, in a span of 3 months or so. It was pure agony, and I immediately went back to eating crap once I reached my target weight. Now I figured it was time to do the same thing again... for like the 10th time in the last 5-6 years. Every time I attempted to lose weight with CICO, I ended up losing a couple kilos, only to quit the diet and return to not counting calories, and even gaining weight. I would feel hunger, tiredness, and just weird counting calories of every food I wanted to eat. I completely disregarded the qualitative properties of food, I genuinely believed 200 calories of a sandwich was equal to 200 calories of cooked pork. Anyway, this time, I was good enough at guesstimations and battling hunger to lose 8 kilos (18 lbs) in a year, eating ice cream, sandwiches, breakfast cereal and (a lot of) pizza.

In April 2023 I was just about to give up. I did not want to live like this. Imagine eating cereal before work, getting hungry at 10 AM and rushing to the bakery to buy a calzone. A calzone is 1000 calories, and my breakfast usually had 300 calories (of cereal or a sandwich). Add cups of coffee to this (around 50 kcal each) and you get to 1450 - 1500 kcal by noon, which meant that I could eat one small meal for the rest of the day, which meant that I would go to bed feeling hunger pangs.

On top of the sheer ineffectiveness of the approach, I started feeling very tired during the day, my libido was low, and I felt a kind of brain fog for months. I had to drink 3-4 cups of coffee just to function normally. Since I actually am a doctor, I decided to do some blood tests, and they turned out fine, aside from a vitamin D defficiency which did not explain my symptoms. Thyroid was fine, kidney function was fine, no diabetes, no signs of infection or any reason of concern for something more serious. I accepted to just feel like crap for months, justifying the exchange of fatigue for (moderate) weight loss.

By April I had read the book 'Wheat Belly' by William Davis, and realized that grains, and wheat especially, was basically poison. I knew the food pyramid was ridiculous, and no kind of grain should be a part of any human meal. I decided to cut out grain products from my diet. This did not go too well because I still believed animal fat and meat was unhealthy because it causes heart disease, colon cancer, hypertension, gout, chronic kidney disease and kidney stones... right? Right? This is Physiology 101, Biochem 202, Internal medicine, this is what we were taught. So, if I couldn't eat fat, and I couldn't eat grains, what could I eat? The answer was not much, so I failed and basically ate croissants and sandwiches regularly.

I then read Paul Saladino's book 'The Carnivore Code,' which I recommend everyone should read, even though the author reversed his position somewhat since then, and is incorrect in recommending people eat honey. After reading the book, I felt skeptical, but decided to try it out out of sheer desperation. I then just couldn't stop losing weight, and had lost 15 kg (33 lbs) in 2 months. I couldn't believe it. I had no issues of hunger. The biggest issue was the carb cravings, diarrhoea and great thirst, which all went away the first week of going carnivore. I still get the occasional carb craving, but I feel better than ever before - I am no longer fatigued, libido is great, I have no hunger issues. I am simply not interested in giving up the diet, and I have developed a serious dose of skepticism about all the things I was taught in medical school about nutrition, which was not much anyway.

So, if you are struggling with weight loss, I can strongly recommend the Carnivore diet. Hell, I started this blog on nostr of all places, because I feel like I need to shout it from the rooftops. I would have never discovered this without bitcoin, which has completely changed me as a person. As bitcoiners, remember :"Don't trust, verify." Read the literature and come to your own conclusions. Once you do, I am confident you will come to the same conclusion as I.

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🐦💼 Twitter (agora X) CEO Linda Yaccarino afirma que o uso está em 'alta recorde' em memorando para a equipe 💼🐦

Em um cenário em constante evolução das redes sociais, o Twitter, agora conhecido como X, continua a se destacar como uma plataforma líder, mantendo sua posição como um dos principais canais de comunicação e interação online em todo o mundo. Recentemente, a CEO do Twitter, Linda Yaccarino, enviou um memorando empolgante para sua equipe, no qual afirmava que o uso da plataforma estava atingindo níveis nunca antes vistos.

Descubra mais detalhes sobre essa emocionante notícia aqui: Leia mais

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🔒 SimpleLogin: Uma Ferramenta Poderosa para Proteger sua Privacidade Online 🔒

No mundo digital em constante expansão, a privacidade e a segurança online tornaram-se questões primordiais para usuários em todas as partes do globo. Com o aumento de ataques cibernéticos e o rastreamento constante de nossas atividades na web, a busca por soluções eficazes para proteger nossa privacidade tem se tornado cada vez mais crucial.

Nesse contexto, o SimpleLogin surge como uma ferramenta poderosa e abrangente para salvaguardar nossos dados pessoais e manter nossa identidade online protegida. Essa plataforma oferece uma maneira fácil de criar aliases de e-mail, o que permite que os usuários protejam suas informações ao se cadastrar em sites ou serviços online. Ao usar aliases em vez de seus endereços de e-mail reais, os usuários podem evitar o rastreamento de suas atividades e reduzir o spam em suas caixas de entrada.

Além disso, o SimpleLogin também protege contra vazamentos de dados, fornecendo alertas em tempo real sempre que um dos serviços associados ao seu alias de e-mail sofre uma violação de segurança.

Com sua interface simples e intuitiva, o SimpleLogin é acessível a todos, independentemente do nível de conhecimento técnico. Ele é compatível com diversos clientes de e-mail e pode ser facilmente integrado aos navegadores mais populares.

Se você está preocupado com sua privacidade online e deseja proteger sua identidade digital, o SimpleLogin é definitivamente uma solução a ser considerada.

Leia mais sobre essa poderosa ferramenta de privacidade em: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/simplelogin

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🚨🔒 Operação de Halving da Polícia Federal bloqueia mais de R$ 130 milhões em crimes envolvendo criptoativos! 🚓💰

A Polícia Federal (PF), em parceria com o Ministério Público Federal (MPF), realizou uma operação impactante na manhã de sexta-feira, 21 de julho. A empresa Braiscompany foi o alvo da ação, que resultou no bloqueio de mais de R$ 130 milhões em crimes relacionados a criptoativos. Denominada "Operação de Halving", essa ação teve como objetivo combater atividades ilícitas que utilizavam criptomoedas no Brasil.

Saiba mais detalhes sobre a operação e suas implicações no cenário de criptoativos lendo a notícia completa: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/operacao-de-halving-da-policia-federal

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🌿📢 A Fundação Nacional dos Povos Indígenas (Funai) emitiu um comunicado importante rejeitando categoricamente a tokenização de créditos de carbono em terras indígenas. O órgão alertou os povos indígenas sobre as 'falsas promessas' dessa prática, que tem se tornado cada vez mais popular no contexto das questões ambientais e das mudanças climáticas.

A decisão da Funai veio após uma análise detalhada dos possíveis impactos e riscos associados a esse modelo. A fundação defende a preservação dos direitos e interesses dos povos indígenas, destacando que o uso de tokens de crédito de carbono pode trazer consequências negativas para as comunidades indígenas e para o meio ambiente.

É fundamental estar ciente dessas questões e acompanhar as decisões relacionadas ao meio ambiente para garantir um futuro mais sustentável para todos. Para ler a notícia completa, acesse: Link para a notícia

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🎉🎶 Festa eletrônica em Belo Horizonte apresentará o primeiro 'cartão em blockchain' do Brasil! 🇧🇷🔗

Uma emocionante novidade aguarda a cena da música eletrônica brasileira! O país está prestes a dar um salto inovador com o lançamento do primeiro Clube de Benefícios que utilizará a tecnologia blockchain para garantir acesso a vantagens e benefícios exclusivos. O anúncio desse projeto revolucionário foi feito durante a festa Red Room, realizada em Belo Horizonte no dia 21 de julho de 2023.

O uso do blockchain promete maior segurança e transparência no acesso aos benefícios, proporcionando aos amantes da música eletrônica uma experiência única e memorável. Com essa tecnologia, os participantes poderão desfrutar de vantagens exclusivas e inéditas, elevando a experiência da festa a um novo patamar.

Essa iniciativa pioneira coloca o Brasil na vanguarda da indústria de eventos, mostrando que o país está pronto para abraçar e explorar as possibilidades da tecnologia blockchain. O futuro da música eletrônica no Brasil parece ainda mais promissor com essa evolução empolgante!

Quer saber mais sobre essa empolgante novidade no mundo da música eletrônica? Acesse a matéria completa aqui: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/festa-eletronica-em-belo-horizonte

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

今天歐洲萬人空巷的大件事，是環法自行車賽抵達終點，巴黎的凱旋門。從7月1日開賽，拚到今天，整整23天，終於結束賽事，暫時分出今年的勝負。

看到選手們的車流，浩浩蕩蕩穿越盧浮宮、凱旋門、榮軍院、協和廣場等等巴黎地標，無數人喝彩接力，一座華城為之封鎖讓路，真真熱淚盈眶不已。

今年環法開賽第一站，很巧，是在Bilbao。包子講，他的房東太太提前一個禮拜就提醒他，7月1日開賽，會封城，記得安排好自己。

開賽在Bilbao的古根海姆美術館門前

環法歷史悠久，而且歷久彌新，年年萬人空巷，是絕美的賽事，我們母子追看那麼多年，今年是第一次，在歐洲沒有時差地看了直播。

環法的官網上，每日選手們比賽的路線，有非常詳細的說明，甚至還告訴你，如果你自己騎這一段，要注意些什麼，等等。

看完官網，讀後感是：人生苦短，一輩子好像無論如何不夠用的苦。

歷年環法的海報

我們母子一邊看今天環法的直播，一邊一起做飯。燉了牛尾清湯，做手工麵條。這裡的牛尾非常優秀、麵粉非常優秀，看包子壓麵用足力氣，不禁感嘆，從前沒有機械化，做麵包真是一件重體力活。包子說，古羅馬的時候，做麵包是奴隸的工作。戰俘淪為奴隸，羅馬人就把他們送去西西里做麵包。

Bilbao景致

Bilbao的咖啡館，很妖嬈，冬天供應熱湯，家家不同，湯譜貼在牆上，進門可以不吃咖啡直接吃湯，像廣東人一樣，一笑。

Bilbao的點心Pintxo

今天的圖片都來自環法

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfjx5ur2wpeqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c8mrqrm
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvf4x5ervd33qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823cdqaveh
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfcxscnqd3nqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823czmjr4k

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

傍晚6:30，想去海邊走走。

坐地鐵30分鐘，到了海邊，Bilbao地區著名的富裕小鎮Getxo，好像翻譯成「哥喬」。

小鎮依山傍海，海岸線綿長，景致美不勝收。此地是老牌富裕小鎮，古建築雄渾壯麗，林立城中。一部分是教堂，一部分是市政廳，還有一部分是當地古老家族的宮殿。古老到什麼程度？12世紀就成名成家，差不多是我們的南宋。

好像無法想像，南宋的豪宅們，依然林立於杭州城中。

一個黃昏，海邊走走，山上走走，滿地玩得盡興的小朋友，以及夕陽餘暉裡，默默對坐的中年夫婦，衣著鮮美，氣概非凡，比比皆是。

好像不用花很多力氣和很多錢，跑去阿瑪爾菲人擠人了，以後。

替補球員們

路過一個公共足球場，立著看一會兒人家業餘球隊踢球。旁邊三五成群的小朋友席地而坐，所謂熏陶，就是這樣子的吧。

Getxo跟Bilbao差不多，從前也是因為鋼鐵工業和航海業而富裕，西班牙的鋼鐵，大多集中在此地附近，是工業革命時期的重鎮。至今，工業革命時期積累的巨大財富，依然歷歷可見。這也是Bilbao能夠成功完成城市轉型的一個根本原因吧，說到底，還是富裕二字。

離開小鎮的時候，天色仍然明媚，而晚間的Jazz已開喉歌詠，海風吹拂裡，默默聽了幾曲。真真是，長夜未央，美貌佳人紅燈坐。

坐地鐵回家，到家剛好晚飯時間。

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfjx5ur2wpeqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c8mrqrm
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvf4x5ervd33qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823cdqaveh

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

Bilbao是西班牙北方小城，居然在此地邂逅上海老友，伊是匆匆過客，僅停兩夜，一路從里昂、巴黎、巴塞羅那、聖薩巴斯提安來，馬不停蹄經馬德里回上海。我們在上海也多年不見了，竟然在這裡碰頭。

一起食個午飯，於當地的小館子，夫妻老婆店，做得很不錯的菜，煎得滾燙滑嫩的omelet，以及極清甜柔潤的狗鱈魚，一點點鹽，一切檸檬淋漓汁水，入口清俊雅麗，完美。

老友很驚奇，包子為何會選擇Bilbao居住？歐洲屈指可數的宜居城市，Bilbao絕對名列前三甲。老友說，我是研究城市轉型的，在攻讀這個課題的博士學位，才知道Bilbao的，包子你是怎麼選到這裡的呢？

我們伴飯的話題，就變成了宜居城市和城市轉型。

1878年的煙紙店

包子講了幾句。

在經歷了英國的蘇格蘭和荷蘭的阿姆斯特丹之後，想找一處溫暖的、陽光充沛的地方，Bilbao四季氣候宜人，有山有海，七月天氣，15至25攝氏度的氣溫，不需要空調，沒有大汗淋灕。

西班牙的大城市，馬德里酷熱，巴塞羅那遊客擁擾，而且生活成本比較貴。就不考慮了。

Bilbao是出名的美食之地，遠勝很多歐洲名城，食物非常便宜，便宜到我這個上海寧咬牙切齒的地步。老友剛從巴黎來，對比巴黎和Bilbao的食物價格、外食價格，也是感嘆不已。

Bilbao特產的鱈魚，賣鱈魚的店，漂亮得像賣珠寶的店

Bilbao沒有交通堵車這件事情，37萬人口的城市，上班族每天上下班往返，花在路上的全部時間，是35分鐘，地鐵票只有兩毛五分錢，城際巴士或者火車，也只有五毛錢，實在是便宜得嚇死人。

街頭的書報亭

老爺叔拉的手風琴，曲子是Bilbao當地足球隊的隊歌，家喻戶曉的名曲

路人甲乙丙

Bilbao最讓我感動，是滿街活蹦亂跳的小朋友，任何時間段出門，都可以見到大群大群的小朋友，在追逐嬉戲，尖叫瘋跑，玩耍得忘情。城中一等黃金地段，處處是孩子們的大型玩具，肌肉結實的小傢伙們，或爬或吊或蕩在玩具上，常常讓我駐足看呆過去。

我已經很久很久，沒有遇見這樣古老的童年了。

跟著而來的，是滿街的童裝店、玩具店，這裡的咖啡館兼售酒精，小朋友們都隨便進出，大人飲酒，小朋友吃果汁或者跟店家要一杯免費白水，法律不囉嗦，市民們自治就好了。

舊書店，去的時候沒有開門，告示上寫，9月3日之前，不收購舊書。大概老闆避暑去了。

我問老友，格麼，你研究了這麼多歐洲城市，除了Bilbao，還有那裡是比較看得上的宜居城市？

老友答，義大利的博洛尼亞。

我們一起笑呵呵的是，那些世界最宜居城市榜單，經常上榜的名城，比如維也納、哥本哈根、蘇黎世，這些城，怎麼會選上榜的？氣候糟糕、食物糟糕、生活成本昂貴，等等。

所以，榜單這個東西，聽聽就好，當它是真的，就不必了，世界宜居城市榜單也好，世界大學排名也好，米其林也好。到了這個年紀，我已經不需要榜單，來幫助我審美判斷了，謝謝天。

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g
nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvfjx5ur2wpeqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c8mrqrm

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

黃昏出門散步，Bilbao 夏季日照很長，長日永晝，很多店鋪營業到晚上八、九點，黃昏五、六點，人們都在公園裡休憩，小館子裡緩緩飲一杯，滿街的孩子們成群呼嘯，這種生氣勃勃，我好像久久久違了。

剛會走路的小朋友，已經在凌空抽射了，驚嘆號。那位給小朋友們供應肥皂泡的老爺叔，其實是乞食者。這麼歡樂的乞食者，真真開闊了我的眼界和胸襟。

櫥窗裡和櫥窗外，色彩一一都繽紛，品味沒話講。歐洲旅行，博物館美術館固然好看值得看，路人甲乙丙丁，也很好看值得看。

在路邊吃一杯咖啡，飽看各色人等，回家寫個短篇小說，絕對綽綽有餘。

想順手買點火腿回去吃，看見路邊的火腿店鋪，就順腳進去了。我的天，小小的店堂裡，在播莫札特的《魔笛》，那種輝煌燦爛，一下子，弄得我立刻吃不消起來。輾轉反側，原地團團轉，以及熱淚盈眶。

老闆是位文靜的老爺叔，聽完一段，我跟他買火腿，請他推薦最好的。老闆於莫札特的華麗詠嘆調裡，跟我講，火腿買回去，開封的時候，拿熱水泡半分鐘，如此最美味。

付了錢，我請他允許我拍點照片，他請我隨意拍。問我喜歡不喜歡莫札特，問包子在Bilbao快樂不快樂、有沒有朋友。我拍到店堂裡的豆子們，老爺叔不好意思地跟我說，啊呀啊呀，通常我是把豆子們放在門口比較好看的，今晚因為等一下要去參加唱歌考試，就提早收進來了。

我的天，怪不得我們在火腿店裡邂逅了莫札特的《魔笛》。

回家路上，包子跟我感慨萬千，一個賣火腿的老爺叔，這麼好的修養啊。

夏日拾珠系列在這裡

nostr:naddr1qqxnzd3exqenjvpc8q6nxvfhqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wvfskueqzypdd5dnhrpllqf9re6ne06y7rnytd8mqnxjq56u0v3xnkqnuy8yakqcyqqq823c83ac7g

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

七月，離開梅雨愁城的上海，辛辛苦苦一趟萬里飛行，抵達西班牙北方小城，Bilbao畢爾巴鄂。

四年未到歐洲，別來無恙的甘甜涼爽，以及密密切切的喜悅隨時隨地。

Bilbao以一座古根海姆美術館名動四海，1997年這座古根海姆建成，當年的遊客數，一下子，從前一年的25000人，狂飆至將近一百萬。舉目當今，以一座美術館響亮一座中世紀古城的案例，Bilbao可算得是全球第一名，這座小城，屢獲各種最優城市獎，是聯合國的經典城市案例，從一個垂垂老矣的工業城市，成功轉型為金融、能源、設計、旅遊、藝術、美食集大成的西班牙小瑞士，是很多至今仍在辛苦掙扎的工業城市，望塵莫及的優等生。

Bilbao擁有600年輝煌歷史，並非只有一個古根海姆，後面慢慢講它的身世來歷。

有意思的是，一年一百萬遊客湧入Bilbao，這座人口不足40萬的小城，竟然沒有淪陷成花枝招展輕浮躁動的旅遊城市，當地人依然我行我素，過著悠揚疏鬆的日子。原因很簡單，九成九的遊客，到此地來，兩個旅遊目的地，看一個古根海姆，逛一逛老城區；住一夜，或者不住一夜，就去下一個城市了。遊客們並沒有影響到當地人的起居習慣，亦沒有侵犯到當地人的紅塵裡。這一點，非常有意思。

街頭閒步，低頭抬頭，漂亮建築此起彼伏，從氣勢驚人的哥特式、巴洛克式，一直到簡潔實用的包豪斯式，樣樣俱全，西班牙特有的、柔和了阿拉伯味道的摩爾風格的建築，亦比比皆是，優雅鮮美，震撼人心。

建築的好，是一種十分具體的好，日日夜夜走過路過，影響了城中民眾半輩子的審美性格，能有多少東西，一年影響你300次的呢？華美建築的那種崇高、清華、致遠，皆不是語言能夠企及的。

所以，我們似乎可以體諒武康大樓前面朝朝暮暮洶湧的人潮，他們和她們，像一夜覺了醒，突然驚覺了武和康的巨大的美。

於古根海姆背面的角落裡，遇見騎行的一家人，這位路人甲老阿姨，還上前要求擺拍一楨🌿

這間摩爾風格的百年老店，食一餐三道菜的午餐，僅僅150元人民幣，讓我長噓短嘆了久久🌿

@ 5ada3677:7c21c9db

溽暑的夜晚，撩開紛紛雨幕，步去巨鹿路的玉芝蘭，食一席夏日川菜，雲朵一樣輕渺婉轉的川菜。是夜，玉芝蘭的主理人蘭桂均師傅，從成都來。

揮汗入座，玉芝蘭於森森的小樓裡，裊裊娜娜。泡一道冷萃茶來飲，龍井桂花雪梨冰茶，萃了漫漫四個小時，240分鐘的整幅耐心，彌足珍貴。茶湯傾入香檳杯中，極清，極冽，極香遠，於冰清玉潔裡搖曳人心，真是魅惑以及高級的。

開胃涼菜，捧上來玉芝蘭的招牌，熊貓攢盒，六個小碟子，呈現了川菜的各種妖冶滋味，從宮保到怪味，一應俱全。川菜的拿手好戲，便是於這些繽紛的滋味裡紛披穿梭，游刃有餘，弄出層巒疊嶂的水墨皴來。除了四川人，其他人大致做不來如此的跳脫靈動。最後一味清口，是一小碟雲南的甜筍。入口峻猛，收口秀甜，一只攢盒，滿分之作。蘭師傅說，這只盒子裡的開胃菜，今晚最辣最麻的味道都在這裡了，後面我們會越食越澹泊，越食越本真。

過中，是蘭師傅的絕活，川西一絕，坐杠大刀金絲麵。這七個字真是美，吃麵之前先吃字，一碗麵的芳名，如一句煉過字的詩，嚴絲合縫，字字妥貼。今晚的麵湯，是純素菌子湯，取小金鮮松茸、四川的乾羊肚菌和福建的乾紅菇共冶一爐，以菌子湯的香，配金絲麵的細，真是才子邂逅佳人，絕配。

白牛肝土雞燉花膠，土雞是靈魂，蘭師傅親手拎了四只好雞，從成都搭飛機來到巨鹿路，熬得的濃稠湯底，有天香，無化學塑料氣，添上白牛肝和花膠，真真矜貴可喜。蘭師傅說，白牛肝和花膠易得，而好雞不易得。這道菜寫上菜單，蘭師傅就有點睡不穩覺，擔心覓不到好雞，如何治得成好菜。

鴛鴦鮑魚，像是鮑魚的比較文學教科書，一個碟子裡，分列了鮮鮑與乾鮑各半切，旁襯一口撈汁的白米飯。這幅格局，有點像日本菜裡，食鰻魚飯，一半白燒一半紅燒，燕環肥瘦，安享一個人的默默選美。而廚家將鮮鮑與乾鮑，分別呈現在各自最好的狀態裡，自然是考究功夫的。

冷吃麻婆豆腐，像麻婆豆腐的一種慕斯版本，豆香濃郁，麻婆妖嬈。這是一個西學為體、中學為用的碟子，中國人追求和爭論了一個世紀的難題，此時此刻，在蘭師傅的碟子裡，完美和諧了。天下大同，原來是如此美味的一件好人好事。

蘭師傅今晚我是初見，伊人走入來，我是一個驚奇不已，蘭師傅很像一個人，像汪曾祺先生，是汪曾祺先生的細皮嫩肉版，蘭師傅比汪曾祺先生骨骼更細緻俊秀一個度到一點五個度。汪先生江蘇高郵人，蘭師傅四川成都人，川和揚，一向緊密不分家。而蘭師傅的一口四川話，娓娓道來，真是好聽的。蘭師傅當晚頻頻說到的一個關鍵字，鮮，四川話說來，是炫的平聲，蘭師傅說好鮮啊，聽起來是好炫啊，平聲的炫，聽入耳，糯糯的，無火氣，真絢爛。

聽蘭師傅講了一會兒他在成都賣得響當當的江湖名菜，豆渣豬手。豬手燉得恰如其分，一大盆，下面墊滿豆渣，吸了飽飽的滷汁，下飯極香。三言兩語，讓我想起了張愛玲小姐青睞有加的一碗好菜，豆腐渣炒紅燒肉汁，張氏筆法寫來，豆渣累累結成細小的一球球，像碎肉。蘭師傅的菜，蘭師傅的容顏，跟兩代文學家奇妙的合轍，是當晚非常意外的欣喜。

這一晚的川菜，輕靈、悠揚、如詩如歌，沒有濃重調味料的狂轟濫炸，食來十分熨貼安詳。曾經想過，年過半百之後，就不食猛如虎的川菜了，今晚邂逅了蘭師傅雲朵般輕渺的川菜，讓我完全改變了想法。

圖片來自亞楠小姐

@ 884f5d1d:1ed306f6

heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu. In enim justo, rhoncus ut,

something else

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec quam felis, ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa quis enim. Donec pede justo, fringilla vel, aliquet nec, vulputate eget, arcu. In enim justo, rhoncus ut,

more stuff

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridicul

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

What is the Limited Supply of Bitcoin? Why is the Limited Supply of Bitcoin Important? The Impact of the Limited Supply on the Value and Rarity of Bitcoin Limited Supply Of Bitcoin Conclusion FAQ

If you're interested in cryptocurrencies, you've probably heard of Bitcoin. But have you ever stopped to think about why Bitcoin is valuable and rare? One key factor is its limited supply. In this article, we'll explain why the limited supply of Bitcoin is important and how it affects its value and rarity.

What is the Limited Supply of Bitcoin? First, let's define what we mean by the limited supply of Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency, and like any currency, it has a set amount that is available for circulation. However, unlike traditional fiat currencies (such as the US dollar or the euro), the supply of Bitcoin is not controlled by a central bank or government. Instead, it is limited by a predetermined algorithm, which caps the total number of Bitcoins that will ever be in circulation at 21 million.

Why is the Limited Supply of Bitcoin Important? So why is the limited supply of Bitcoin important? One reason is that it helps ensure its value and rarity. Just like gold or other precious metals, the limited supply of Bitcoin means that it is a finite resource. As more people become interested in owning Bitcoin and demand for it increases, the limited supply helps to drive up its value. This is known as the law of supply and demand: as the demand for a product or resource increases, but the supply remains fixed, the price will go up.

The Impact of the Limited Supply on the Value and Rarity of Bitcoin The limited supply of Bitcoin is also important because it helps to prevent inflation. Inflation is when the value of a currency decreases over time, due to an increase in the supply of money. This can happen when a central bank or government prints more money or increases the money supply in some other way. With Bitcoin, the limited supply means that there is no risk of inflation, as the total number of Bitcoins will always be fixed at 21 million.

Limited Supply Of Bitcoin However, it's important to note that the limited supply of Bitcoin does not guarantee its value or rarity. The value of Bitcoin, like any asset, can be affected by a variety of factors, including market demand, adoption, and regulatory changes. It is also possible that the use of Bitcoin could become less popular in the future, which could potentially impact its value.

Overall, the limited supply of Bitcoin is a key factor in its value and rarity. By capping the total number of Bitcoins that will ever be in circulation at 21 million, it helps to ensure that demand for the cryptocurrency drives up its value and rarity. However, it is important to consider that the value of Bitcoin, like any asset, can be affected by a variety of factors and is not guaranteed.

Conclusion The limited supply of Bitcoin is an amazing feature that helps to ensure its value and rarity. By capping the total number of Bitcoins at 21 million, it creates a fixed and finite resource that is subject to the law of supply and demand. This helps to drive up the value of Bitcoin as demand for it increases, and also prevents inflation by ensuring that the money supply cannot be increased. While the value of Bitcoin, like any asset, can be affected by a variety of factors, the limited supply is a key factor in its value and rarity. It is an innovative and impressive aspect of the cryptocurrency that has helped to contribute to its success.

FAQ

What is the limited supply of Bitcoin? The limited supply of Bitcoin refers to the fixed amount of Bitcoins that will ever be in circulation, which is capped at 21 million.

How is the limited supply of Bitcoin determined? The limited supply of Bitcoin is determined by a predetermined algorithm, rather than being controlled by a central bank or government.

Why is the limited supply of Bitcoin important? The limited supply of Bitcoin is important because it helps to ensure its value and rarity, as well as prevent inflation.

How does the limited supply of Bitcoin affect the value and rarity of the cryptocurrency? The limited supply of Bitcoin means that it is a finite resource, and as demand for it increases, the limited supply helps to drive up its value.

Is the value of Bitcoin guaranteed by its limited supply? The value of Bitcoin, like any asset, can be affected by a variety of factors and is not guaranteed. However, the limited supply is a key factor in its value and rarity.

What is inflation, and how does the limited supply of Bitcoin prevent it? Inflation is when the value of a currency decreases over time due to an increase in the money supply. The limited supply of Bitcoin prevents inflation by ensuring that the total number of Bitcoins will always be fixed at 21 million.

Can the limited supply of Bitcoin be changed? The limited supply of Bitcoin is determined by a predetermined algorithm, and cannot be changed without a significant change to the underlying code of the cryptocurrency.

What other factors can affect the value of Bitcoin? Factors that can affect the value of Bitcoin include market demand, adoption, and regulatory changes.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

Twitter: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 8c29b321:4336aaa0

Community 🧑‍🤝‍🧑

• Join us today at 14:00 UTC for Community Call #52 on Nostr Nests where we'll go over this very newsletter in detail. Tune in here
• Next Monday, we have a call with Geyser about the user experience of their crowdfunding service and how it could be improved. Help with your feedback
• Want to listen in on project calls? How about Alby, Bitcoin Core App, Fedimint, or [Habla.News](nostr:npub1048qg5p6kfnpth2l98kq3dffg097tutm4npsz2exygx25ge2k9xqf5x3nf
• TABConf is interested in having bitcoin design representation at the conference. Can you make it to Atlanta in September? Interested in organizing something?
• The Wallet Scrutiny website redesign went live. A huge thank you to all who were involved. The team tweeted about the redesign: https://twitter.com/WalletScrutiny/status/1677049573011800064
• The Summer of Bitcoin Student Satyam continues to work on the Lightning wallet for blind people. He'll now start the design phase of the project. Follow along in #accessibility
• The Bolt.Fun AI4All tournament continues and there are several events which run until the end of this month

Bitcoin design guide 🗺

• The Wallet Selector page is now live in the How it works section
• There's a new PR for a new page about send fees (preview). It builds on our existing content and adds additional scenarios and explanations
• Help review the new page with guidelines for adding case studies to the guide. A timely addition for an upcoming case study for the Wallet Scrutiny redesign that just went live
• The PR for improving how contrast is handled in the website could use a review from a web developer
• Provide feedback for the planned "How it works" page for Complex Spending Conditions (a.k.a. Miniscript), related to issue #992
• Should the guide cover ecash (à la Fedimint and Cashu)? Chime in

Seeking feedback 🗣️👂

• Joseph from Kumuly is wondering which pattern you prefer for a bitcoin & lighting card?
• What do you think of these "I love UTXO's" shirt designs?
• Help Tanishka find the right typeface and loading animation for uMlando wallet
• A new Nutstash website and wallet design went live and the team would appreciate feedback

Everything else

• The new Phoenix wallet introduces splicing, here's a walkthrough. And another explanation of splicing here
• Congrats to the Austin Bitcoin Design Club on their 1-year anniversary: https://twitter.com/SahilC0/status/1682434842196332544
• The intricate UX of signing a Payjoin transaction on a small SeedSigner screen: https://twitter.com/KeithMukai/status/1654235821405360129
• You can store your passphrase as colors instead of words: https://twitter.com/DocumentingBTC/status/1678103284140109825?s=20
• Blockstream rolled out Greenlight, a core lightning node service
• Win sats with Bitcoin scratchcards
• Read about the invisible details of interaction design
• In #opportunities ...
• Help refine the Joinstr brand (a CoinJoin implementation using Nostr)
• Amboss is looking for a designer
• Help Bitcoinize design a point-of-sale device: https://twitter.com/BitcoinizePoS/status/1677238177688371200?s=20
• On Bitcoiner Jobs, Ordimint and LN Capital are looking for designers, and Geyser for a front-end engineer
• On Stacker News, Lightning Labs is looking for a Marketing Lead, and Umbrel for a Design Engineer

For more, visit the Bitcoin Design website and follow us.

This update is brought to you by Christoph & Mo. We'd love to hear your feedback.

@ 4657dfe8:47934b3e

Funding open-source code is challenging

Software developers have built the internet and shaped the world we live in today by sharing their code with their community voluntarily and without charge. This ecosystem created giants like Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google or Microsoft and many other software companies.

Over the past couple of years, we’ve observed a number of models emerging that tried to establish a way of contributing back to the ones who are generously helping to build the internet with their software such as OpenCollective or GitHub Sponsors. But given the extensive and complex network of software packages, funding high-visibility projects is not sufficient, if their dependencies are also not supported.

That’s why developers are able to receive funding for npm packages by adding a funding property to their code packages. This creates visibility to npm users on what dependencies are actively looking for funding.

What about npm fund

Running npm fund lists all dependencies that are looking for funding specifying the type of funding and the URL to visit. However this has several limitations: First developers need to create their own website and integrate a payment service provider or link directly to a third party platform to accept contributions. In any case code publishers are limited to the offered currencies and depend on 3rd parties to receive payments.

Second software projects can consist of dozens of dependencies, trying to donate to all of them takes a considerable amount of time and is financially not feasible for small amounts.

PkgZap automates npm fund

PkgZap, a showcase built by Alby, allows developers to contribute back to all code dependencies by zapping all at once thanks to bitcoin as programmable money.

PkgZap leverages the bitcoin lightning network to offer direct contributions of any amount. Payments happen instantly and automatically split across all dependencies. This drastically lowers the barriers for project owners to give value back for the value that they receive also known as Value4Value.

As a package developer

You only have to add a lightning address to your package.json file.

Have a look at this example

{ ... "funding": { "type": "lightning", "url": "lightning:hello@getalby.com" }, ... }

Create an Alby Account to get a lightning address or choose one from these providers.

As a project developer

Run the npx @getalby/pkgzap-cli command in your project directory. It fetches the funding information from the package details by analysing the dependencies. Enter your desired total amount you want to split among all supported dependencies. Approve the wallet connection and you're done! 🚀 Have a look at this short demo here

Let the sats flow and support your favourite open-source projects!

Try it now

If you know a npm package with a lightning address or you want to try it with the @getalby/pkgzap package yourself, scroll to the end of pkgzap.albylabs.com and enter the package name. Don’t forget to install the Alby Browser Extension or another WebLN enabled wallet to zap it.

If you have ideas on how to improve the experience for package and project developers or if you have questions about how to power your software package with programmable money, reach out.

@ 4e00c412:04107886

Blockchain Trilemma

Breve premessa. L’utilizzo del termine blockchain per definire la base architetturale del Protocollo Bitcoin è fin troppo generico e fuorviante. La catena di blocchi e di transazioni contenute in essi costituisce un registro di eventi immutabile nel tempo: una linea temporale ben definita e scolpita e dunque una timechain. Non si tratta di un concetto estremista o massimalista, che dir si voglia, ma solo di comprensione e competenza sul/del Protocollo.

Detto questo, il concetto di blockchain trilemma prende in considerazione tre elementi chiave:

• Scalabilità
• Decentralizzazione
• Sicurezza

Tutti e tre insieme non è possibile averli: per limiti tecnici e funzionali né va sacrificato uno.

Bitcoin ha preferito “sacrificare” la scalabilità per massimizzare decentralizzazione e sicurezza.

Parliamoci chiaro: la blockchain come struttura dati non è poi così versatile e in chiave di una architettura distribuita e decentralizzata, per come la intendiamo, non scala.

Per consentire la scalabilità vanno prese in considerazione astrazioni di livello superiore (on top): si parla dunque spesso di L2, L3, ecc… anche se nel mondo di Bitcoin è più corretto di applicazioni funzionali di protocollo. Definire infatti, nel caso di Bitcoin, Lightining Network, o Liquid, come semplice Layer 2, sarebbe estremamente riduttivo e semplificativo: si tratta di un protocollo che poggia sulla sicurezza del Protocollo Bitcoin e della sua timechain.

Per quanto riguarda Bitcoin infatti ci si riferisce più a uno stack protocollare: LNP/BP (Lightining Network Protocol on Bitcoin Protocol).

La trattazione di questo argomento esula il post: la precedente digressione serve solo a chiarire un concetto molto spesso non pienamente compreso.

Esaminiamo dunque, qui di seguito quelli che a tutti gli effetti possono essere considerati i 7 punti cardine della sicurezza nel Protocollo.

Decentralizzazione

Il livello di decentralizzazione è in genere misurato con il “Coefficiente Nakamoto” che in soldoni indica quando facile, o difficile, sia fare un attacco al 51%. I dati raccolti dai miner, i client, i developers, gli owners ecc.. sono usati per stabilire questa misura. Più alto è il valore del coefficiente più sicurezza c’è.

Crittografia

Una forte base crittografica è essenziale per mettere “al sicuro” le transazioni sulla rete.

Bitcoin usa la crittografia a chiave asimmetrica.

Tale tecnica crittografica usa chiavi diverse per cifrare e decifrare. La chiave pubblica permette a perfetti sconosciuti, ambiente trustless, di scambiarsi dati cifrati, mentre la chiave privata di decifrare questi dati.

La chiave pubblica può essere derivata dalla privata ma non è vero il viceversa.

Meccanismo di Consenso

Il Consenso è l’elemento vitale per la sicurezza della rete.

E’ concepito in modo tale da consentire a un sistema decentralizzato con molteplici partecipanti, detti nodi, di convergere collettivamente sulla validità e l’ordine delle transazioni che andranno a far parte della timechain.

Il meccanismo di consenso utilizzato da Bitcoin è il Proof of Work (PoW) in cui sono i miner ad approvare le transazioni che entreranno a far parte dei blocchi.

Immutabilità

Al meccanismo di consenso è strettamente legato il concetto di immutabilità dei record, blocchi con transazioni, scritti sulla timechain. Più alta è la quantità di lavoro necessaria, difficulty, più sono i miner che contribuiscono al raggiungimento del consenso, hashrate, più è sicura la rete e di conseguenza immutabili i record.

Nessun ente centrale (sicurezza intrinseca della rete)

La natura decentralizzata della rete esclude intrisecamente l’esistenza di un unico point of failure il ché rende impossibile per un attaccante comprometterne l’integrità. Infatti, nel caso in cui un insieme di nodi risultasse compromesso, la timechain distribuita su una vasta rete a giro per il mondo sarebbe tutelata anche e soprattutto grazie al Consenso che eviterebbe a un attore malevole di raggiungere i propri scopi.

Sicurezza di Bitcoin Script (Smart Contract)

Script permette di creare transazioni programmate per consentire il passaggio di valore tra le parti (considerate ad esempio il caso del multisig in cui per sbloccare un output è necessario un numero di firme pari a quello stabilito dallo script di blocco). Usando gli smart contract è possibile far fuori del tutto gli intermediari è risolvere i “contenziosi” attraverso il codice.

Governance e Aggiornamenti

Sebbene immutabile e decentralizzata, la timechain può essere vista come un essere vivente che si evolve e si adatta a nuove necessità (vedi soft fork). Nulla di tutto ciò può però avvenire senza il consenso, nel senso di adozione, della maggior parte della rete e dei suoi attori. Non esiste il concetto di “one man show” e in genere chi ci prova si ritrova fra le mani un hard fork inutile (vedi bitcoin cash e la block size war).

Possibili, ma solo teoriche, insidie alla timechain

Trattandosi di un registro pubblico, i malintenzionati sono sempre dietro l’angolo…Esistono in particolar modo due tipi di attacchi che potrebbero insidiare la timechain di Bitcoin. Notiamo che si tratta di pura teoria visto che allo stato attuale di distribuzione della rete e sopratutto grazie al “potere” di Consenso raggiunto, hashrate, la probabilità che uno degli attacchi descritti possa avere successo è vicinissima allo zero.

51% attack

Si verificherebbe nel caso in cui un gruppo di miner riuscisse a racimolare il 51% percento di hashing power prendendo così il controllo della rete. Immaginatevi il costo economico di tale attacco e agli zero benifici ottenibili (leggi: compromessa una rete il valore del token diretto allo zero).

Sybil attack

In questo caso gli attaccanti andrebbero a generare molteplici identità sulla rete, nodi, cercando di saturarla e per certi versi comprometterne la credibilità. Il creare molteplici nodi potrebbe anche essere usato per attaccare la privacy degli utilizzatori della rete in particolare di chi non possiede e/o utilizza il proprio nodo come ingresso al Protocollo.

Per una timechain a prova di apolicasse Zombie

Abbiamo visto dunque che Bitcoin per sua natura “ha scelto” di dare priorità agli aspetti di decentralizzazione e sicurezza piuttosto che a quello di scalabilità (tanto mettetevi il cuor in pace che qualsiasi cosa cerchino di vendervi in giro, la blockchain non scala e se scala è qualcos’altro).

La natura fortemente decentralizzata della rete, nonché il Proof of Work, permettono di assicurare che in caso di uno degli attacchi descritti in precedenza, gli attaccanti non possano riscrivere la storia, e non si tratta di negazionismo, tanto meno svolgere attività fraudolente vista la potenza computazionale in gioco.

Altre due parole per quanta riguarda gli smart contract. In uno dei paragrafi precedenti abbiamo parlato di Script che è il linguaggio di programmazione che permette di aggiungere “della logica”, anche complessa, all’interno dello schema della transazione. Si tratta di un linguaggio limitato e proprio per questo motivo stanno venendo fuori dalla community molte proposte tra cui la più interessante pare essere allo stato attuale RGB on Lightining Network.

Introducendo questi protocolli on top oltre ad “aggiungere funzionalità” si rafforza il concetto di sicurezza di Bitcoin e soprattutto:

• più decentralizzazione perché i nodi Lightining sono nodi a se e per funzionare hanno la necessità di avere a disposizione un full node Bitcoin
• un altro livello di crittografia/cifratura per proteggere questo tipo di transazioni che “in genere” sono off-chain (lo spiegheremo in un post dedicato ma per completezza sono on-chain solo la transazione iniziale di apertura di un canale e quella di chiusura/aggiornamento dei saldi).

Tutto per dire che qualsiasi asset e i dati associati che si muovano on top al Protocollo Bitcoin ereditano un altissimo livello di sicurezza aggiungendone spesso dell’altro.

Con buona pace degli Zombie.

@ 0210502e:251e0022

Saṃsāra is the truth, the reality, the place where all the good things exist.

There is no heaven or hell waiting for you, you are the ultimate being with the power to create things, the power of thinking, understanding surroundings, and the power to communicate. You just put lightning between two rocks and created a processor, you fooled the sand to think and made a computer out of it, and you produced a way to talk to these non-living things and make them do what you desire.

There is no heaven more beautiful than this, no hell as bizarre as this. This human life is the best thing you might ever get regardless of your pain, problems, and misery. If you want to escape this form of life, you are vastly illusioned. Look around, your fellow being have done this, made something out of something. You are a part of it.

Create art, machines, rockets, and theories; explore science, reality, the world, and humans; learn maths, physics, and languages; share value, understanding, thoughts, and kindness; embrace human life, make things, and try to not die before achieving.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Una mexicana identificada como Anayeni Rodríguez sufrió una negligencia médica de manos de un doctora cubana que trabaja en ese país gracias al acuerdo de La Habana con Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO). En respuesta a la publicación de este caso, Miguel Díaz-Canel salió a defender lo que suele llamar "ejército de batas blancas" y dijo que EEUU "trata de denigrar el esfuerzo que realizan".

Según un reportaje de Latinus, medio mexicano con sede en EEUU, nueve de cada diez negligencias médicas en México no son denunciadas, por lo que la mayoría de estas malas prácticas quedan impunes, de acuerdo con especialistas en salud. La víctima de este caso, Anayeni Rodríguez, fue sometida a una intervención quirúrgica en el Hospital General de Calpulalpan, en Tlaxcala, el cual pertenece al sistema IMSS-Bienestar (programa público que ofrece medicamentos y atención médica gratuita a las personas sin seguridad social). Ahí fue víctima de negligencia médica por parte de una especialista cubana que le colocó en el brazo "alambres retorcidos" y tornillos que le provocaron dolores e infecciones.

Ante los problemas de salud derivados de la mala práctica, Rodríguez tuvo que endeudarse con 85.000 pesos para atenderse en un hospital particular y así salvar su brazo. Ahora está a la espera de que a través de un proceso de conciliación pueda recuperar ese dinero.

La especialista involucrada en esta negligencia es parte del grupo de médicos y enfermeros de Cuba que han llegado a México gracias a la Administración de Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Ese grupo representa para el Gobierno federal y para el de la Ciudad de México un desembolso superior a los 150 millones de pesos (casi nueve millones de dólares).

Latinus precisó que Rodríguez le comentó a la doctora cubana los síntomas que presentó después de la operación. Como respuesta, la cubana le negó cualquier problema y aseguró que los malestares de la paciente eran psicológicos. "Tu operación está bien hecha, yo te puse dos alambres con dos tornillos. Te puse dos alambres bien retorcidos", dijo la galena de la Isla a Rodríguez, según el testimonio ofrecido por esta última.

Después de la cirugía, Rodríguez regresó tres veces al hospital por complicaciones en el brazo. Nadie escuchó sus reclamos ni aceptaron haber actuado de forma negligente. Al padecer diabetes, la paciente tuvo miedo de perder el brazo derecho que ya estaba infectado, y decidió acudir a un médico privado. Este otro especialista se asombró al ver el trabajo realizado por la doctora cubana e intervino nuevamente a Rodríguez.

Esta mexicana interpuso una queja ante la Comisión de Arbitraje Médico de Tlaxcala. Ahora espera que, mediante la conciliación, pueda recuperar el dinero que pagó para aliviar el tratamiento inadecuado del que fue víctima. Rodríguez asegura que la doctora cubana no ha sido sancionada por lo que hizo, ni ha recibido una resolución económica a su favor.

La presencia de los médicos cubanos fue promocionada por el Gobierno de México como un apoyo para los sistemas de salud estatales y el federal. Sin embargo, señaló Latinus, su participación en los hospitales y clínicas no tiene parámetros claros para evaluarlos.

Una funcionaria de la Secretaría de Salud de Tlaxcala declaró al citado medio (bajo condición de anonimato): "La estrategia de ellos (los médicos cubanos), de ese programa a través del cual ellos vienen, se enfoca más en números. Se enfoca más en productividad, en a lo mejor ver 20 pacientes en el día. Pero la calidad, la atención que les dan no es la misma porque todo es apresurado.

Mientras tanto, Miguel Díaz-Canel dijo el lunes en Twitter que "la cooperación internacional que Cuba presta sigue desarrollándose como característica emblemática de la política exterior". El gobernante cubano se pronunció sobre este tema un día después de que se hiciese público el caso de Rodríguez.

Para Díaz-Canel esta situación, como la mayoría de los problemas que genera su Gobierno, están vinculados a EEUU. "Es una actividad legítima y altruista, que mantenemos a pesar de la sucia campaña de EEUU para tratar de denigrar ese esfuerzo y privar a cientos de miles de personas en el mundo de los servicios médicos de calidad que prestan los profesionales cubanos", añadió el primer secretario del Partido Comunista de Cuba en Twitter.

Según reporta el diario oficial Granma, el ministro de Relaciones Exteriores del régimen, Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla, fue más allá y dijo que "el Gobierno de EEUU lanzó una convocatoria que asigna fondos millonarios para fomentar una campaña contra la colaboración médica cubana".

"Sin argumentos —continuó Rodríguez Parrilla—, EEUU recurre una vez más a la calumnia para desacreditar la noble labor humanitaria y solidaria de Cuba en apoyo a la salud de otros pueblos. Es totalmente legítimo que Cuba y otros países del mundo implementen programas de colaboración para atender y proteger la salud de su población. La salud es un derecho humano básico y EEUU comete un crimen al pretender negarlo u obstaculizarlo con motivos políticos."

A mediados de abril pasado, unos 20 médicos cubanos exportados por el régimen de La Habana a México fueron rechazados por las autoridades del estado de Morelos, por carecer de la documentación acreditada que demostrara que poseían las especialidades solicitadas.

@ d3d74124:a4eb7b1d

This plan was GPT generated originally but then tweaked by myself as the idea fleshed itself out. All feedback welcome and encouraged.

Shenandoah Bitcoin

1. Executive Summary

Shenandoah Bitcoin is a for-profit community organization based in Frederick County, VA, uniquely blending the world of agriculture and STEM. Our mission is to foster community spirit, stimulate interest in agricultural technology, and promote understanding of Bitcoin, while providing enriching educational opportunities and ensuring sustainable business operations.

2. Company Description

Shenandoah Bitcoin is committed to delivering value to our local community. Our unique approach intertwines traditional agricultural practices, modern STEM concepts, and the world of digital currencies, specifically Bitcoin. Our activities cater to all age groups, focusing on fostering community engagement, hands-on learning experiences, and contributing to the overall welfare of our community.

What’s in a name?

Shenandoah Bitcoin. Shenandoah - an old and historied land. Bitcoin - a cutting edge technological advancement. Both encompass multiple industries, from energy and manufacturing, to farming and data centers. Both built using Proof of Work.

3. Services

We offer a range of services, including:

Family-friendly events: Agriculture, STEM, and Bitcoin-themed festivals, fairs, workshops, and community gatherings. Educational programs: Classes, seminars, and workshops on agricultural technology, STEM principles, and understanding and using Bitcoin. Facility Rentals: Spaces available for private events, business meetings, and community gatherings.

4. Membership Benefits

We offer tiered membership packages with benefits such as:

a. Silver Membership: Includes access to regular events, discounts on educational programs, and priority booking for facility rentals.

b. Gold Membership: All Silver benefits, free access to select educational programs, and further discounted facility rentals.

c. Platinum Membership: All Gold benefits, free access to all educational programs, highest priority and maximum discounts on facility rentals, and exclusive invitations to special events.

Member’s opting to pay in Bitcoin receive 10% off all pricing.

5. Market Analysis

Our primary market is the local community in Frederick County and Winchester, VA, which consists of various demographic groups. Our secondary market includes neighboring communities, tourists, businesses, and educational institutions interested in the intersection of agriculture, STEM, and Bitcoin. Understanding that facility use and events to be a drawing factor for all demographics, we outline demographic specific analysis below.

STEM professionals in the area may work remotely or commute toward DC and not interact much with their agricultural neighbors, but a desire for good quality food exists for many. In addition to events, drawing the STEM demographic in will be connections to CSAs, ranchers, and homesteaders for access to fresh locally grown food. Offering a child's play room adjacent to some office space, is a compelling benefit for the laptop class that is often in STEM professions.

Non-industrial food producers and homesteaders may not have the focus or resources for marketing and sales. By offering a physical touch point for them and direct connections to consumers, food producers benefit from membership. Having more options for drop off/pick up of various produced goods, makes it attractive for both the consumers and producers as coordination can be asynchronous.

Bitcoiners have a wide range of sub-demographics, including farmers and software engineers. Some travel hours over car and plane to attend bitcoin themed events. The topics of STEM and agriculture are of shared interest to non-trivially sized communities of bitcoiners. Having a physical touch point for bitcoiners will draw in some members just for that. Building fellowship is desired and sought in bitcoin.

5.1 Market Trends

The blending of agriculture, STEM fields, and Bitcoin is a unique concept with increasing interest in sustainable farming and ranching, food sovereignty, and health. Shenandoah Bitcoin is poised to tap into this growing interest and offer unique value to our community.

5.2 Market Needs

Our market requires initiatives that foster community engagement, promote understanding of agri-tech and Bitcoin, and provide a versatile space for events and learning.

6. Marketing and Sales Strategy

We will employ a blend of digital marketing, traditional advertising, and strategic partnerships. Our main marketing channels will be word of mouth, social media, local press, and our website. Partnerships with local small businesses, homesteaders, schools, agricultural organizations, and bitcoin companies will form a key part of our outreach strategy.

7. Organizational Structure

Shenandoah Bitcoin will be led by a CEO, supported by a management team responsible for daily operations, event planning, marketing, and community outreach. Event management and logistics will be handled by part-time staff and volunteers.

8. Financial Projections

Our revenue will be generated from membership fees, charges for events and educational programs, and facility rentals.

9. Funding Request

[If seeking additional funding, describe your needs and how the funds will be used]

10. Exit Strategy

Should it become necessary to dissolve the business, assets such as property, equipment, and any remaining cash reserves after meeting liabilities will be sold. Investors would receive their share of the remaining assets according to their proportion of ownership.

11. Conclusion

Shenandoah Bitcoin is a unique community organization bringing together agriculture, STEM, and Bitcoin in Frederick County, VA. Our distinctive approach is designed to deliver both profits and social impact, resonating strongly with our target market and positioning us for sustainable growth.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Vicente Campos es parte de las víctimas mortales del ambiente violento que impera en la Isla. (Foto: Vicente Campos – Facebook)Guantánamo otra vez se tiñó de luto ante el asesinato de un joven, llamado Vicente Campos, a puñaladas durante la madrugada de ayer domingo, según informó en redes sociales el periodista local Miguel Reyes Mendoza.

El comunicador reportó que el violento asesinato ocurrió entre las 12:50 de la medianoche y la 1:00 a.m. De acuerdo con el testimonio de un testigo bajo el anonimato, el mortal ataque se originó por una discusión entre muchachos.

Cuando la situación llegó a su momento más tenso, el homicida agredió a Vicente, quien trató de huir y buscar refugio en el área conocida como El Malecón, pero el atacante lo alcanzó, asestándole ocho puñaladas.

Reyes Mendoza agregó que otros dos muchachos se acercaron al agresor después del ataque y los tres huyeron, abandonando malherida a la víctima. Aunque recibió ayuda de los vecinos y se le brindó asistencia médica en un hospital, lamentablemente murió a causa de las lesiones. En medio del dolor y la consternación, amigos del joven han recurrido a las redes sociales para escribir emotivas palabras en su honor.

“En paz descanses, mi amigo, mi hermano, Blanquita como yo te decía, hoy es uno de los peores días para mí al saber que te quitaron la vida así sin más, no lo esperábamos, te tocó una de las desgracias más malas que le pueden pasar a un ser humano”, lamentó en Facebook la joven que se identifica en redes como La Mulatika De Los Sánchez Sánchez.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Tres ciudadanos involucrados en el asesinato del fotógrafo guantanamero Orlando Tamayo Guevara fueron detenidos y se les ocuparon las pertenecías robadas, según informa el perfil de Facebook Edwin Lewis, asociado al Ministerio del Interior (Minint).

El robo con violencia donde resultó privado de la vida Tamayo Guevara ocurrió el pasado viernes en el domicilio del fotógrafo, ubicado en la calle Máximo Gómez, No. 703, entre Narciso López y Jesús del Sol, municipio cabecera de Guantánamo.

La nota publicada refiere que “en menos de 24 horas fueron determinados los autores (3)”, a quienes se les ocuparon dos motorinas eléctricas y una importante suma de dinero.

Según Edwin Lewis, los detenidos “reconocieron su participación directa en este hecho” y “se les ocuparon los medios y bienes sustraídos, razón por la cual se procesan conforme a las normas jurídicas vigentes en el país por el delito de asesinato”.

Sobre el suceso, la población de Guantánamo, una provincia sumida en una profunda ola de violencia, originada por la extrema pobreza que se vive en ese oriental territorio, opina que de comprobarse la implicación de los asesinos debería aplicarse sobre ellos la pena máxima.

“Hay que aplicarles la pena capital o cadena perpetua porque el tema de los asesinos es que de la cárcel se sale con buen comportamiento y el dolor que causan también es infinito y pensar que la mayoría son jóvenes deseando tener cosas materiales de esa manera. Todos los malhechores son conocidos por los jefes de sectores y aun así se vanaglorian de todas sus fechorías ante la sociedad trabajadora”, opinó en las redes sociales una residente en la urbe del Guaso.

Por su parte, Sachy Suarez reflexionó que “cuando miras las fotos de las cosas robadas no te impresiona lo material recuperado, sino el dolor, el vacío que tienen esos familiares de la víctima”.

La ola de violencia que se ha desatado en los últimos meses en Guantánamo no tiene precedente en la historia reciente. El propio Minint reconoció hace algunas semanas que había atrapado a seis responsables del asesinato de dos cubanos que fueron igualmente víctimas de robo en su vivienda y al enfrentar a los ladrones terminaron privados de la vida con armas blancas.

No obstante, en su más reciente intervención en la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular, Miguel Díaz-Canel restó importancia a la violencia en el país, aseverando que los hechos eran magnificados por la prensa independiente y los enemigos de la revolución.

“Hay un manifiesto empeño imperial de crear un clima de inseguridad y de desconfianza ciudadana que fracture la unidad popular en nuestro país. Por eso, constantemente se exagera cualquier hecho delictivo, fundamentalmente los casos con violencia y, en particular, los de violencia de género”, argumentó el mandatario sin que ningún diputado guantanamero le refutara con las propias notas de prensa que emite el Minint para reconocer la ola de violencia.

@ a4a6b584:1e05b95b

Introducing Box Chain - a decentralized logistics network enabling private, secure package delivery through Nostr identities, zero-knowledge proofs, and a dynamic driver marketplace.

Identity Verification

A cornerstone of Box Chain's functionality and security is its identity verification system. Drawing on the principles of decentralization and privacy, it eschews traditional identifiers for a unique, cryptographic solution built on the Nostr protocol.

When a new user wishes to join the Box Chain network, they begin by generating a unique cryptographic identity. This identity is derived through complex algorithms, creating a unique key pair consisting of a public and a private key. The public key serves as the user's identity within the network, available to all participants. The private key remains with the user, a secret piece of information used to sign transactions and interactions, proving their identity.

Unlike many centralized systems, Box Chain does not require any form of real-world identification for this process. This is crucial for a few reasons. First, it ensures the privacy of all participants by not requiring them to disclose sensitive personal information. Second, it allows Box Chain to operate independently of any jurisdiction, enhancing its universal applicability.

Once their identity is established, participants engage in the network, accepting and fulfilling delivery tasks. Each successful delivery, confirmed by the receiver, contributes to the participant's reputation score. This reputation score is publicly linked to their identity and serves as a measure of their reliability and performance.

A critical aspect of mitigating potential identity fraud is the stake requirement. Each participant, before they can accept a delivery task, is required to stake a certain amount of Bitcoin. This acts as a form of collateral, held in escrow until the successful completion of the delivery. The staked amount is forfeited in case of fraudulent activities or non-delivery, creating a strong financial disincentive against dishonest behavior.

Overall, the identity verification system in Box Chain, built on unique cryptographic identities, a reputation score system, and the staking mechanism, provides a robust framework to ensure reliability and trust in a decentralized, borderless context. It significantly mitigates the risks of identity fraud, further strengthening Box Chain's promise of secure, efficient, and private package delivery.

Zero-Knowledge Proof Shipping Information

Box Chain's unique approach to preserving privacy while ensuring accurate delivery relies heavily on the concept of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs). This cryptographic principle allows for the verification of information without revealing the information itself. 

When a package is set for delivery, the sender provides the recipient's address. This address is immediately subjected to cryptographic transformation - the details are processed and turned into a form that is impossible to understand without a specific decryption key. This transformation process is designed to ensure maximum privacy - the original address remains known only to the sender and, eventually, the recipient.

In this transformed state, the address can still be verified for its validity without revealing its actual content. This is where ZKPs come into play. The sender, by leveraging ZKPs, can prove to the Box Chain system that they possess a valid address without needing to reveal the specifics of that address. This protects the privacy of the recipient by ensuring their address isn't openly visible on the system.

For the delivery process, the route is broken down into relay points, each assigned a particular driver. This relay-based system plays a significant role in preserving privacy and ensuring package safety. Instead of providing the entire route to each driver, they only receive the location of the next relay point. This is accomplished by giving them a cryptographic key which, when applied to the encrypted route data, reveals only the necessary information - the location of the next relay driver.

This way, the sender's address and recipient's final address remain as private as possible. Moreover, it enables the package to be securely handed off from one relay driver to the next, each having access to only the information necessary for their leg of the journey. 

It's important to note that this process, while extremely secure, can take a longer time due to its relay nature and the cryptographic processes involved. There may also be a need to introduce a timeout mechanism for each leg of the journey to ensure drivers complete their part in a reasonable timeframe.

By incorporating ZKPs and a relay-based delivery system, Box Chain is able to provide a level of privacy and security that is rare in the logistics world, striking a balance between efficiency and privacy.

Delivery Confirmation

One of the key aspects of ensuring the success and trustworthiness of Box Chain's decentralized package delivery service is the process of delivery confirmation. To make this process as secure, transparent, and reliable as possible, Box Chain implements a multi-signature approach that leverages the power of cryptography.

When a delivery is made, it is not enough to simply leave the package at the prescribed location. Confirmation of delivery is critical to ensure the transaction is closed and the delivery person can receive their payment. This is where the multi-signature approach comes into play.

In essence, a multi-signature approach means that more than one party needs to provide a digital signature to confirm the transaction. For Box Chain, this involves both the receiving party and the delivery person. After the delivery person leaves the package at the prescribed location, they would use their private cryptographic key to sign a confirmation of delivery. The recipient, upon receiving the package, would do the same. 

These digital signatures are securely generated using each party's private key and are incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to forge. This means that when both signatures are provided, the system can be confident that the package was delivered and received successfully.

As a further layer of security and accuracy, Box Chain incorporates geolocation confirmation into its delivery confirmation process. This means that when the delivery person signs the confirmation of delivery, their geographic location is checked against the intended delivery location. If the two locations match within an acceptable margin of error, this acts as another layer of proof that the delivery was made successfully.

This process ensures that delivery confirmations are not only secure but are also indisputable. It provides a significant level of trust and reliability, both for the sender and receiver, but also for the delivery people who are looking to receive their payments. 

Furthermore, it aligns with the principles of decentralization and privacy, leveraging the power of cryptography and blockchain technology to provide a secure, transparent, and effective service. This approach positions Box Chain as a pioneer in combining the gig economy with the blockchain technology, providing a unique and secure package delivery solution.

Package Security

Guaranteeing the security of packages throughout transit is fundamental to Box Chain's service offering. To accomplish this, Box Chain utilizes a unique stake system that incentivizes delivery drivers to handle packages with the utmost care.

When a sender initiates a delivery, they specify the value of the package being shipped. This value is used to determine the stake amount that the delivery person must deposit to accept the delivery task. The stake functions as a form of shipping insurance, held in escrow by the Box Chain system until successful completion of the delivery. 

The stake amount set by the sender is commensurate with the value of the package, allowing the sender to decide how much insurance they deem appropriate for their shipment. Higher-value packages may necessitate a larger stake, serving to reassure the sender that the delivery person has a significant financial incentive to ensure the safe delivery of the package.

In the event that a package is lost or damaged, the stake acts as a safety net for the sender. The staked amount is forfeited by the delivery driver and is transferred to the sender as compensation for their loss. 

This system not only provides reassurance to the sender, but also gives a powerful incentive for delivery drivers to handle the packages with care. By having their own funds at risk, delivery drivers are likely to go the extra mile to ensure packages are safely delivered to their destination.

Further enhancing the security of the package, Box Chain uses a multi-signature approach during the relay handoff process. The current delivery driver and the next relay driver must both provide a digital signature to confirm the handoff. This ensures that responsibility for the package is officially transferred from one party to the next in a secure and verifiable manner. This "chain" of signatures creates an auditable trail that adds another layer of security and trust to the process.

Through the combination of a stake system and multi-signature handoff confirmation, Box Chain provides a comprehensive security solution that ensures packages are not only delivered efficiently but are also safeguarded throughout their transit journey.

Routing Algorithm and Pricing Mechanism

The efficiency and economic fairness of Box Chain's service hinge significantly on its innovative routing algorithm and pricing mechanism. This system is designed to ensure a smooth journey for each package, while also ensuring that delivery drivers are fairly compensated for their work.

The journey of a package begins with the sender specifying the destination and offering a starting payment for delivery. This payment information is propagated to the network, along with the package's destination, where potential delivery drivers can view it. However, unlike traditional package delivery services, the journey and price aren't fixed from the onset. Instead, Box Chain employs a dynamic, decentralized, and market-driven approach to optimize routing and pricing.

The total journey is divided into smaller legs, each of which can be undertaken by different delivery drivers. The starting payment offered by the sender is not a flat rate for the whole journey but is instead used as an initial bid for each leg of the journey. This bid is then doubled, and the network waits for a delivery driver to accept the offer. If no one accepts, the bid continues to increase in increments, creating an auction-like environment.

This system allows the real-time market dynamics to determine the cost of delivery. Factors such as distance, package weight, or even current traffic conditions can influence how much a delivery driver is willing to accept for a leg of the journey. If a leg of the journey is particularly difficult or inconvenient, the price will naturally rise until it reaches a level that a delivery driver deems worthwhile.

By allowing the drivers themselves to choose which jobs to accept based on their own assessment of the work's value, Box Chain creates a fair, flexible, and dynamic market where compensation is closely tied to the effort and resources required to complete a delivery. This is akin to how the Tor network or the Lightning Network operates, but instead of data packets being routed and priced, Box Chain is doing this with physical packages in the real world.

Such a system not only incentivizes delivery drivers to participate but also ensures the service remains adaptable and resilient to changing conditions and demands. This represents a novel and intelligent use of blockchain technology to disrupt the traditional gig economy model, placing the power in the hands of the individual drivers and fostering a more equitable and efficient market.

Incentive for Participation

Box Chain's unique approach to package delivery provides a plethora of compelling incentives for individuals to participate in the network as delivery drivers. By offering the potential for higher earnings through a competitive and dynamic bidding system, Box Chain encourages active participation and healthy competition within its network.

Upon initiating a package delivery, the sender offers a starting bid for each leg of the journey. This bid is then escalated through the network, doubling with each round until a delivery driver accepts the task. This mechanism presents delivery drivers with the opportunity to earn more for their services, especially in cases where the journey is long or complex.

However, the competitive aspect of the bidding system also helps regulate the pricing. Although prices might be high initially, as more delivery drivers join the network and competition increases, the bid required to win a delivery job is likely to decrease. This dynamic balance ensures a fair market price for delivery services while also enabling delivery drivers to optimize their earnings.

Furthermore, Box Chain's reputation system, based on the Nostr protocol, provides an additional layer of incentive for delivery drivers. The reputation of each driver is tracked and publicly displayed, allowing senders to gauge the reliability and efficiency of their potential couriers. As drivers successfully complete deliveries and earn positive feedback, their reputation score increases. 

This reputation score can play a pivotal role in the Box Chain economy. Drivers with higher reputation scores may demand higher bids for their services, reflecting their proven track record of successful deliveries. Alternatively, the system could grant priority in the bidding process to drivers with higher reputation scores. This not only incentivizes good performance and reliability but also helps to foster trust within the network. 

Overall, Box Chain's combination of a competitive bidding system and a reputation-based incentive structure encourages active participation and ensures a high standard of service. By aligning economic incentives with high-quality service delivery, Box Chain empowers its participants while also ensuring a satisfying experience for its users.

Here is an additional section covering dispute resolution and failed delivery handling that could be added:

Dispute Resolution and Failed Deliveries

For a decentralized network like Box Chain, dispute resolution and handling of failed deliveries present unique challenges. To address these in alignment with its principles, Box Chain implements an arbitration-based system and a dual-stake mechanism. 

In case deliveries fail due to recipients being unavailable or refusing, both the sender and recipient are required to stake funds as collateral. If the delivery cannot be completed, the stakes are forfeited and awarded to the delivery driver as compensation for their time and effort. This creates a disincentive for recipients failing to receive packages and ensures drivers are paid for their work.

For disputes between senders, recipients and drivers, Box Chain leverages a decentralized arbitration system built on the Nostr protocol. Independent arbitrators stake their own funds and adjudicate disputes based on review of evidence from both parties. Their incentive is a small percentage of the transaction amount.

The arbitration process involves submission of dispute details, review of evidence, ruling based on policies, and appeals handled by additional arbitrators if required. A majority ruling wins the appeal. This system, relying on staked incentives and the wisdom of the crowd, enables fair dispute resolution aligned with Box Chain's ethos.

By combining reciprocal stakes and decentralized arbitration, Box Chain is able to provide robust recourse around failed deliveries and disputes while retaining its principles of decentralization, privacy, and aligned incentives. These mechanisms strengthen the system and instill further user trust and satisfaction.

Bitcoin + Nostr = <3

The combination of Bitcoin and Nostr represents a powerful and synergistic integration of decentralized technologies. Bitcoin provides a secure, transparent and decentralized means of value transfer, while Nostr offers a decentralized protocol for creating and managing digital identities and data. Together, they can enable truly decentralized and privacy-preserving applications, like Box Chain, that have the potential to disrupt traditional business models and empower individuals around the world. The future looks promising with such advanced and transformative technologies working hand in hand.

Read more from Adam Malin at habitus.blog.

Adam Malin

adammalin.com

You can find me on Twitter or on Nostr at

npub15jnttpymeytm80hatjqcvhhqhzrhx6gxp8pq0wn93rhnu8s9h9dsha32lx

value4value Did you find any value from this article? Click here to send me a tip!

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

Freedom Technologies - Privacy Risk VS User Prioritization

The present digital age has witnessed the advent and development of "freedom technologies", also known as "freedom tech". Despite the significant strides in technology, concerns have arisen over the erosion of user privacy and ethical oversight due to private investments. Technology giants such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have tumbled on the delicate balance between raising private investment capital and preserving users' data privacy.

Private Investment - A Dangerous Fall For User Privacy

Focused on expansion and growth, technology companies often seek financing from private investors. However, this seemingly harmless source of capital can paradoxically rise against the fundamental rights of the users of these platforms, the right to privacy. Under the pressure to generate prodigious returns for their insatiable investors, these companies may fall into the temptation to alienate their users' most valuable asset, their data.

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and others out of necessity or lack of vision, simply reshaped their business models to prioritize quick and voluminous earnings. They entered a dangerous spiral of selling user data to generate targeted advertising. This is, undoubtedly, a profitable business, but at a dehumanizing cost - the desecration of users' private boundaries.

The Indispensability of Prioritizing the User - The New Ethical Model

Given this bleak scenario, a new approach is crucial for freedom technologies that prioritize the user first, their privacy, and the right to an ethical service. Developers and platforms need to reinvent their business framework, creating ethical financing alternatives.

A viable possibility could be the transformation in the platform's relationship with the user, from a data explorer to a service provider, charging users directly. As opposed to the "free" but predatory model, charging a fee for the use of the platform keeps the model clearly transparent and straightforward concerning privacy.

In addition to being clearly ethical, this model has the potential to provide a solid financial base without resorting to the exploitation of personal data. Furthermore, it creates a safe environment where users can interact without the constant fear of their privacy being invaded for commercial benefits.

Awareness of the importance of digital privacy is increasing, and so is the number of users willing to invest in services that respect their online freedoms. It is in the wake of this trend that freedom technologies should consolidate, fulfilling their ethical promise.

In summary, technology companies need to embrace the duty of social responsibility, recognizing the severe repercussions of depending on private investments that may lead them to compromise users' inviolable privacy. The future of freedom technologies depends on these companies' ability and willingness to offer ethical solutions that protect the user's digital freedoms, transforming them from victims of exploration into valued customers.

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

Tecnologias de Liberdade - Risco de Privacidade VS Priorização do Usuário

A atual era digital testemunhou o nascimento e desenvolvimento das "tecnologias de liberdade", também conhecidas como "freedom tech". Embora hajam avanços importantes na tecnologia, tem surgido uma preocupação sobre a erosão da privacidade do usuário e a supervisão ética nas mãos do investimento privado. Gigantes da tecnologia, como Twitter, Facebook e Instagram, já tropeçaram na delicada balança entre levantar capital de investimento privado ou manter a privacidade dos dados dos usuários.

Investimento Privado - Uma Queda Perigosa para a Privacidade do Usuário

Empresas de tecnologia, com foco em expansão e crescimento, muitas vezes, procuram financiamento de investidores privados. Contudo, esta fonte aparentemente inofensiva de capital pode, paradoxalmente, insurgir-se contra os direitos fundamentais dos usuários dessas plataformas, o direito à privacidade. Na pressão de gerar retornos prodigiosos para seus insaciáveis investidores, estas empresas podem cair na tentação de alienar o bem mais valioso de seus usuários, seus dados.

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram e outros, por necessidade ou falta de visão, simplesmente remodelaram seus modelos de negócios para priorizar rendimentos rápidos e volumosos. Entraram numa perigosa espiral de venda de dados dos usuários para gerar publicidade direcionada. Este é, sem sombra de dúvida, um negócio lucrativo, mas a um custo desumano, a profanação das fronteiras privadas dos usuários.

A Indispensabilidade de Priorizar o Usuário - O Novo Modelo Ético

Perante este grave panorama, é crucial uma nova abordagem para as tecnologias de liberdade que priorize em primeiro lugar o usuário, a sua privacidade e direito a um serviço ético. Desenvolvedores e plataformas necessitam de reinventar o arcabouço do seu modelo de negócios, criando alternativas éticas de financiamento.

Uma possibilidade viável pode ser a transformação na relação da plataforma com o usuário, de explorador de dados para prestador de serviço, cobrando diretamente dos usuários. Ao contrário do modelo "gratuito" mas predatório, a cobrança de uma taxa pelo uso da plataforma mantém o modelo claramente transparente e direito no que se refere à privacidade.

Além de evidentemente ético, este modelo tem o potencial de proporcionar uma base financeira sólida sem recorrer à exploração de dados pessoais. E ainda assim, cria um ambiente seguro onde os usuários podem interagir sem o medo constante de invasão da sua privacidade para benefícios comerciais.

A consciência da importância da privacidade digital está aumentando, e com isso, o número de usuários dispostos a investir em serviços que respeitam suas liberdades online. É na esteira desta tendência que as tecnologias de liberdade devem se consolidar, cumprindo sua promessa ética.

Em resumo, empresas de tecnologia devem abraçar o dever da responsabilidade social, reconhecendo as repercussões severas de depender de investimentos privados que as encaminhem para comprometer a inviolabilidade da privacidade do usuário. O futuro das tecnologias de liberdade depende da habilidade e disposição dessas empresas em oferecer soluções éticas que protejam as liberdades digitais do usuário, transformando-os de vítimas de exploração em clientes valorizados.

@ 97c70a44:ad98e322

Recently David King had me on his NostrTalks podcast, and one of the things we talked about was how custom feeds might work. I was reeling from David challenging my assumptions about relay centralization, so I didn't do a good job of enumerating what our different options for custom feeds are, and how they differ.

Data Vending Machines

Pablo followed up here, asking my opinion on custom feeds in general, and his Data Vending Machines proposal in particular. I thought I'd write up my response in long form for posterity.

I like DVMs, although I ignored it for a while because I figured that Pablo was bouncing off the walls as usual (congrats on placing in the AI competition!) and I'd wait till he settled down. I read a bit of his nip this morning and the custom feeds use case caught my eye as an interesting application of the DVM idea.

Algorithm options

I don't know if vending machines are a good solution to custom feeds, but I'm open to being convinced. Below are a few different approaches we could take to the problem:

• Built into clients — closed or open source, not swappable except maybe using NIP 89
• Built into relays — swappable, composable, monetizable, allows for moderation/publishing models, can support "private" algorithms. Also highly consistent, you're not going to get partial data because events weren't where you were looking.
• Published by pubkeys — not parameterizable. We saw how this went with @Sherry​'s recommendations bot. Great idea, but lots of limitations.
• List- or label-based curations — lightweight, not parameterizable, but very clean, could support private use case via wrapping
• DVMs — parameterizable, monetizable, but very heavy, probably not suitable for general purpose custom feeds due to latency
• Custom algorithms published as NostrScript events — swappable, pluggable, very flexible, content-addressable.

I think all those options have their own benefits and trade offs for different use cases. Relay-based feeds are going to be good for low-latency, dynamically-built feeds. Pubkeys are good for publishing-type use cases. NostrScript is good for shareable user-defined feeds (and other things).

I don't think DVMs make sense for "feeds" as we think of them, but could be good for generating more bespoke artifacts, like a "top highlights for this week" email/feed, or something that interleaves nostr events with some external data source.

My favorite of the bunch is lists and/or labels, which can be arbitrarily nested and used by clients/scripts/relays to build more sophisticated feeds (for example, by incorporating distributed moderation or web-of-trust-based recommendations subjective to the target user).

This has actually always been a core part of my vision for nostr and coracle since even before I found nostr. Unlike Amethyst's kind-1984 based content moderation approach, lists and labels can be interpreted using user-defined terminology.

In other words, the definition of "good music" depends on who you ask. Allowing the answer to be generated not by a single pubkey or relay, but by your entire network seems to best embrace the emergent behavior nostr enables. These content recommendations can be weighted as much as desired based on other social data including reactions, replies, mutual follows, how many lists someone appears on, etc.

Of course, this more analysis-heavy approach means that feeds are not defined only by lists and labels, but by an opinionated interpretation layered on top of those, which might best be provided by a relay, DVM, or client.

Do we even want feeds?

While we're on the topic, it's also worth asking if "feeds" are really what we want. The idea is very closely tied to the infinite-scroll pattern common on legacy social media, and the name evokes the process of fattening livestock for the kill. In some ways, I think infinite scroll is with us for better or for worse - pagination buttons at the bottom of a page is no solution, that would just be an inferior version of the same thing.

Perhaps, taking a leaf out of Twitter's book, brevity is the answer. Being forced to fit our thoughts into 280 characters helps us write more clearly and with more interest, what if "feeds" had the same constraints? Having no page bottom incentivises a never-ending list of diffuse non-information.

This is one reason I love email newsletters - at best they are carefully researched, edited, scheduled, and sent to your inbox. The email inbox is a hostile place, missives that land there are likely to suffer a swift demise. If an email is to survive, it must be something the recipient wants to read.

In a way, The Nostr Report is itself a custom feed in this sense, published via a shared pubkey. It would also be possible to write a "client" that links your pubkey and email, and sends you a daily/weekly digest, tailored to your interests and social graph.

Taking this idea a step further and combining it with list and label based feeds, instead of creating lists based on content, you might create a list based on timeframe. Then, in order to generate a digest for that day or week, you would pull all time-based curations from your network, analyze them for common threads, and re-publish as an email, note, or list.

At any rate, I think this is an exciting area of research, and that we've only scratched the surface of what's possible with an open social graph. I'm glad to see Pablo creating an entirely new category of solution with his proposal.

@ 8ad25d02:b63495ab

Just got to know about habla, lets see where it takes us. ~ Craze

@ 7e7224cf:d8febb7d

Hey bitcoiner!

This week we’ve seen the true beauty of numbers appear right in front of our eyes…

nostr:note13ec4wcqql3gjk6x35g8sjpv6ychnpd85swqds7zzdwp8656rnmeqa304j7

Hot Off the Press:

🥸 Faketoshi Strikes Back
🎰 Bitcoin Isn’t Gambling!
🇰🇼 Kuwait Gives Bitcoin the Boot
🛂 US Big Brother Tightens his Grip
👁️ Trading Eyeballs for Equality?
✍️ BitGo Integrates MuSig2
👨‍💻 nostr:npub1an84q6c03wml5lf0uwcqcr20ydwv0t0lvv0xktlcfs9seattef8sdhz6yg Introduced a New Nostr Dev Course
🫧 Soapbox Bags OpenSats Grant for Ditto
🐦 Wanna Chat? Pay!
🤖 Nostr + AI = 💜
📺 Watching, 🎧 Lustening and 📚 Reading tips
🐸 Meme collection by nostr:npub1hlx26mahecypqppmwqnu5xlust2uq8mz8z0h42sqt9u2qarc5ahsf68mlu

Mempool:

Lightning:

Mining:

🥸 Faketoshi Strikes Back

Craig Wright grants appeal in Bitcoin lawsuit.

UK court grants appeal to Craig Wright in Bitcoin copyright lawsuit. Wright claims copyright to Bitcoin white paper and database. Ruling reversed, giving him a chance to argue his case. Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund denies his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto and calls for proof. Trial expected in 2024. Wright argues Bitcoin Core developers control the network, facing opposition from BLDF. Concerns raised over open-source software implications.

While Craig Wright persists in his legal battle, the Bitcoin community remains skeptical of his claims. Given the opposition and lack of evidence supporting his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, it is obvious that all his attempts to assert copyright over Bitcoin's white paper and database will ultimately fail. As time goes on, it is hoped that the news feed will be free from such controversies, allowing the focus to shift back to the genuine progress and innovation in the Bitcoin space.

---

🎰 Bitcoin Isn’t Gambling!

UK Government Says No Dice to Bitcoin Gambling Regulation

https://cdn.nostr.build/i/b6dbe2978f57e409fc0b64b6bc60b50fab9e73a2b3c6d562b2b06244bea3949e.jpg

The Treasury Committee's "same risk, same regulatory outcome" suggestion didn't sit well with the UK government. It raised concerns about conflicting mandates with financial regulators. The government is already knee-deep in crafting market regulations and is aiming to set standards for Bitcoin firms. The legislation, which will take into account the committee's recommendations, could be in force by late 2023.

The UK government's decision to reject the proposal to regulate Bitcoin as gambling might be seen as a win for the market's long-term development. However, some UK citizens might have preferred the gambling angle, potentially dodging stricter regulations and enjoying lower taxes. This makes it a hot-button issue among Bitcoin investors in the country.

---

🇰🇼 Kuwait Gives Bitcoin the Boot

Kuwait bans all Bitcoin and shitcoins transactions.

Seems like Kuwait's Capital Markets Authority (CMA) has decided to play the party pooper for all things Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in the country. They've slapped a big, fat "NO" on Bitcoin payments, investments, and even mining. Talk about a buzzkill!

The CMA has also put the kibosh on local regulators handing out licenses to firms that offer virtual asset services as a commercial business. But hey, if you're dealing with securities and other financial instruments regulated by the Central Bank of Kuwait and the CMA, you're in the clear. Phew!

The regulator has issued a warning to customers about the risks tied to virtual assets, highlighting that they don't have legal status and lack backing from any asset or issuer. This leaves their prices open to speculation and sharp drops.

Same shit, different country. The mindset of those in power seems to be stuck in the traditional centralized systems they're so comfortable with and used to. But here's the kicker: bitcoin doesn't play by traditional rules. It can't be banned. They can block their citizens from buying bitcoin via traditional banking routes, they can drive miners out of the country, but they can't stop Bitcoin. The best they can hope for is to fall behind in this race to acquire the soundest money by the government and its citizens. It remains to be seen how much good that'll do them.

---

🛂 US Big Brother Tightens his Grip

Starting Jan 1 2024 US citizens transacting over $10k will have to provide detailed info

Coin Center’s case challenging Congress’s expansion of Section 6050I of the tax code was dismissed as unripe by the district court. This law will require citizens who are recipients of crypto payments of $10,000 or more to report to the government not just the transaction, but the Personally Identifiable Information of the sender as well - all without a warrant.

See the discussion below for details:

nostr:note1q3j2dya5ueqknv6s2ql8wh732rp6teqp2qwcczx67k0pa30mv80qpx262p

Seems like walls are closing in across the world, and we have to fight for our rights. But make no mistake, this is not the issue of Bitcoin, this is a problem caused by the government leaders who seek control, masking their actions behind care about the citizens and attempts to fight evil criminals and fraudsters. Make no mistake, if we let surveillance into our homes and our pockets, regaining our freedoms will be really challenging.

---

👁️ Trading Eyeballs for Equality?

Worldcoin is enticing citizens of developing countries with financial equality in exchange for their biometric data.

Worldcoin, a new player in the shitcoin arena, is promising to eradicate financial inequality. But there's a catch - they want your biometrics. Is that too steep a price?

https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1451990496537088000?s=20

The company is luring users by scanning their irises and other biometric data, offering them free money in return. Worldcoin's recruitment drive is mainly aimed at lower-income communities in developing countries, with field testing conducted in 24 countries, including Sudan, Indonesia, Chile, and Kenya. The startup has set a lofty goal of a billion sign-ups by 2023.

Interestingly, the company's plan to distribute the new world coin equally among the earth's population seems a bit skewed, considering 20% of the coins have already been allocated to Worldcoin’s full-time employees and investors.

Despite the controversies, Worldcoin has managed to attract substantial investment, with Andreessen Horowitz recently leading a $100 million investment round that tripled the startup’s valuation to $3 billion.

History repeats itself. Information is power, and those hungry for power will continue to invest their ever-inflating dollars in anything that gives them access to your data. Quick-witted crypto entrepreneurs keep coming up with innovative ways to harvest that data in a bid to raise funds from VCs and secure a comfortable future for themselves. This is the definition of fast money: get in, pull the rug, get out. And your iris scan? It'll remain up there (unless you really believe they delete that info) long after you're gone. This is why we Bitcoin.

---

✍️ BitGo Integrates MuSig2

A major US payment provider is integrating multisignatures on top of Schnorr into its wallets.

This can increase privacy and reduce fees, as MuSig2 operates as a single private-public key wallet, just like the single-sig ones do.

“Aggregating multiple keys and signatures into a single key and signature that appear on chain is a big efficiency gain for multi-signature transactions”

---

Byte-size Buzz:

• nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt shared a sneak peek of the upcoming wasabi wallet release:

nostr:note1vshjqr3mk3nvkc6yawv7kvs98avrzluz7p8lv76djwven2r5f8uqz0lpdz

• Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced plan to back the dollar with Bitcoin & end Bitcoin taxes:

• Crypto whales targeted in wave of home invasions near Vancouver.

• Wasabi wallet turned out to be susceptible to fingerprinting.

• Gensler’s doing to crypto what he did to gold.

• MIT researchers acknowledge the grid balancing, methane mitigating benefits of bitcoin mining in new paper.

https://twitter.com/Dennis_Porter_/status/1681144031877959681?t=ah4dwBQ8VLTp9OwcO2BWXQ&s=19

• Bitcoin received 99% of fund inflows into cryptocurrency investment products last week.

🧮 Nostr Recap

nostr:note1j9s52temwan2yjllds05drjgv3dfm5e2pcvfu2nsq3qzf4fuqu3qsgpq3v

---

👨‍💻 Pleblab Introduced a New Nostr Dev Course

Pleblab, a group of tech savvy individuals, famous for their Lightning workshops and Bitcoin courses, introduced a Nostr course for developers.

nostr:note1fa5ge2tuwf9gfh6fv93mdgpw8sxtx8qk4uq402g7sh49y6zpcn3shxxssc

The course is suitable even for people without any coding experience and is definitely useful to understand the fundamentals of Nostr. You will create your first Nostr app and be well on route to becoming a Nostr developer. We find this to be a great opportunity as Nostr is growing fast and developers are very much needed here.

There are a few options to purchase the course, including the opportunity to apply via Oshi and get 17% sats back, however we didn’t find a way to pay with sats directly. Waiting for a reply from the team.

nostr:note1nft0lqxxx2jjjczyj6rhe0s2g3gqj4s43rlmnp95svfkclqgpvkqe4tanz

---

🫧 Soapbox Bags OpenSats Grant for Ditto

Soapbox has secured an OpenSats grant to develop Ditto, a project to port Soapbox to Nostr.

Soapbox, a source of innovation on the Fediverse, is addressing the limitations of the ActivityPub protocol used by Mastodon with Nostr. The new project, Ditto, is an open-source, self-hosted social media server for online communities, built on the Nostr protocol. OpenSats has agreed to fund Soapbox for one year out of its Nostr fund, and Alex Gleason has stepped down from his role at Truth Social to pursue this mission full time.

Details: * Announcement * GitLab repository

---

🐦 Wanna Chat? Pay!

Twitter has decided to play hardball with unverified users.

Twitter's latest move has got everyone tweeting. The social media behemoth is putting a leash on unverified users by limiting their daily direct messages. The magic number remains a secret, though. While some users are doing a happy dance, hoping for less spam, others are crying foul, suspecting a push towards the paid Twitter Blue service.

Meanwhile Nostr CEO announced the new feature called Nostr+ 🤣

nostr:note1k20tplwgp93z7m23zcut4q2quk2afl7a4rtgntqfhwz39h73ymhsf8ek9w

When the going gets tough, traditional platforms get restrictive. Some users might see this as a necessary evil, but they're not seeing the full picture: the mere ability of tech giants to put a cap on users' actions is a red flag. Who's to say you won't be next on the chopping block if it suits the company's needs?

---

🤖 Nostr + AI = 💜

AI generated transcripts are now available in the developer version of Highlighter

Pablo has been working hard on a so-called a Data Vending Machine (DVM) and his efforts are obviously paying off. The developer has recently made what can easily be called mind blowing tech public, even though for the more reckless ones. Now, if you are using the developer version of the Highlighter app (more about it in Tony’s guide here), you can have AIs compete to provide the transcript of a podcast, video or any other media for you to be able to save and/or highlight the pieces you want and convert the material into native Nostr events.

Embrace the technology, or bite the dust 💨. The world we are living in is moving exponentially faster and it is ever harder to keep up. Instead of trying to push back on such developments, the smart thing to do is embrace change and use the tools at our hands to make ourselves more efficient. The first episode of Guy Swan’s podcast with Jeff Booth is well worth your time to feel the magnitude of the happenings.

---

Byte-size Buzz

• Snort got a new logo

nostr:note1qsskc4v5vnax2zn56ep9gz0h6nnv6ej96kdctxr0f24p3vysx0xs37uccy

• A preview of Nostr Browser by Brugeman

nostr:note1ywqxk2y3qrhzx5yd2cnav9ctnmvuwcertmujwpq96839ljs0ja3sqn0dg2

• Pablo announced AI custom-made feeds for Highlighter

nostr:note1c4ndvqu7qttyeufm0v7thfvayu2nj5euft5gnyqyjgl860eannjqh8upv7

Bitcoin

• First version of Mutiny wallet is available for Android

nostr:note1x8pwwf9jc38u890zgwpt4rvqaqt5zcrk00gzast0p2w28fkjyrls2xh53s

• All new Blockstream Jade is available for pre-order.

• Hodl Hodl dropped a fully redesigned version of their non-custodial lending platform Lend. You can support Bitcoin Herald by signing up on Hodl Hodl using our referral link.

• Sparrow Wallet v1.7.8 now supports Taproot message signing (BIP322) and much more.

• Nunchuck Wallet release introduced numerous updates. GitHub | App Store.

• Mempool.space released a clock and a calculator.

Nostr

• Yet another update of Nostr Kiwi:

nostr:note1dd3fq37rx4fr0m9hkuu3c4cu5gkrat8qyefda6lmjftzdqh6gucq2wp9mz

• https://www.nostrnet.work/ by nostr:npub1cmmswlckn82se7f2jeftl6ll4szlc6zzh8hrjyyfm9vm3t2afr7svqlr6f allows you to manage all your Nostr apps from a single place.

• A simple question-and-answer Nostr client - Swarmstr - released.

nostr:note1msx09rccrcnzafclq9jpc0hlc35v47gkpex43duv2w0w9mdxg5msc494j5

• Marce Files starring Avi Burra

• Pav from Synonym talks about Lightning Liquidity Providers and sheds light on their functionality: The Rise of Lightning Service Providers

• Moderated Content: Hanging by a Thread. This episode elaborates on the legality of moderation and free speech on social media. (h/t nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240). Listen on Fountain

nostr:note1rkysq7m43erl8fz0pk7ll8hp8277ruzce2rx5kzu8d4km36wpzvs2rl75m

nostr:note1sml79x4y6hpuqy8xr2squdztjzxa59lkmv2560vv9aqne6z3hkwq3pn7vl

Meme collection by nostr:npub1hlx26mahecypqppmwqnu5xlust2uq8mz8z0h42sqt9u2qarc5ahsf68mlu

nostr:note15umwelqn02jhxqq00gc8wr2g36v6qgd783k3esm54n48xyzc8xsscp3vs4

---

Enjoyed this week’s digest? Don’t forget to zap⚡️ it!

@ e97aaffa:2ebd765d

Um dos princípios básicos de economia, é a Lei da Oferta e Procura.

Num mercado em concorrência perfeita, os agentes econômicos tomam decisões que variam o preço até que este seja tal que a quantidade procurada seja igual à quantidade oferecida, resultando daí um equilíbrio econômico em que não há incentivos para a alteração de quantidades ou preços.

Nos períodos em que a oferta de um bem ou serviço excede a procura, seu preço tende a cair. Já em períodos nos quais a procura passa a superar a oferta, a tendência é o aumento do preço. Ou seja, se a oferta é maior que a procura, os preços diminuem; se a procura é maior que a oferta, os preços aumentam. in Wikipedia

Excesso de produto

O excesso de produto no mercado pode acontecer devido a duas circunstâncias, o aumento de produção ou a diminuição do consumo. 

Este excesso vai levar a uma diminuição do preço.

Escassez de produto

A escassez de produto no mercado, é devido a um aumento do consumo ou uma redução na produção.

Nesta situação leva ao aumento do preço do produto.

Correcção

Sempre que existe um desequilíbrio na economia, por excesso ou escassez, o mercado adapta-se e corrige este desequilíbrio. 

A demora dessa correção é consoante à dificuldade da mesma. No caso da origem do desequilíbrio foi a escassez de matérias primas, essa correcção poderá levar mais tempo até estar resolvida.

Vamos a um exemplo, que é mais fácil de entender. Na época do início da pandemia, passou a ser obrigatório a utilização de máscaras cirúrgicas, houve uma procura gigante e como existiam poucas no mercado, o seu preço chegou a preço exorbitantes e mesmo assim esgotou em todo o lado. 

Como a procura era imensa, as fábricas que já produziam aqueles produtos aumentaram a sua capacidade de produção. E também novas fábricas foram criadas para conseguir produzir o suficiente para satisfazer a procura.

Assim que a produção aumentou, o preço começou a baixar, levou algum tempo até existir um equilíbrio entre a oferta e procura, assim que foi alcançado, o preço das mascaras aproximaram-se dos valores pré pandemia.

Bitcoin

No caso do bitcoin, o preço também é a lei da oferta e procura mas tem uma particularidade especial.

Neste ciclo do bitcoin foram criados 900 btc por dia, mas só os pequenos poupadores (que tem 0.1 a 10 btc) acomularam aproximadamente 1750 btc por dia. Ou seja, só este grupo está a “retirar” do mercado o dobro do que é produzido, está a diminuir a liquidez do mesmo.

A crescente procura é notória nas exchanges, a liquidez não era tão baixa desde dezembro de 2017.

Ao contrário dos restantes mercados, o Bitcoin tem uma particularidade, a oferta não é livre, foi previamente programada e é imutável, dando uma enorme estabilidade e previsibilidade na política monetária. Para o ano que vem, vai acontecer o halving, a oferta de novos btc vai cair para metade.

Enquanto nos outros mercados, quando existe um desequilíbrio devido à elevada procura, a indústria começa a produzir mais para estabilizar. No caso do Bitcoin vai acontecer o oposto, a produção vai ser reduzida para metade, vai criar uma enorme choque de oferta.

Se a procura de btc pelas pessoas comuns (pequenos poupadores) manter-se, esta será 4 vezes superior que a oferta. Mas o tempo e a experiência tem demonstrado que este grupo de pessoas está a aumentar. A este grupo de poupadores, podem-se juntar o institucional, grandes empresas e fundos, caso seja aprovado os ETFs nos EUA.

Os bitcoiners estão excessivamente optimistas em relação aos ETFs, eu estou mais moderado, não sei se esta desconfiança é racional, ou se é apenas o meu desejo, mas eu acredito que o forte crescimento acontecerá no utilizador comum. Eu prefiro ter milhares de pessoas com pouco btc a 1 investidor com muito capital.

Na verdade, mesmo ainda sem aprovação dos ETFs, o institucional já está em força no bitcoin.

Se à escassez de oferta, juntarmos um excesso de procura, será um duplo choque. Estou bastante optimista para o Bitcoin, o próximo ciclo será excepcional.

---

Texto original em http://www.rei-artur.com/oferta-e-procura/ a 4 de Julho de 2023

@ e97aaffa:2ebd765d

Algo para refletir…

Não vamos falar do caso específico da Ledger, porque estiveram mal em todos os sentidos. Vamos apenas refletir se faz ou não sentido um hardware wallet (HW) custodial, será ou não uma boa ideia?

É claro que para nós, bitcoiners hardcore, nerds e puristas não faz sentido uma HW custodial, mas para nós é relativamente fácil as novas tecnologias e sabemos as consequências de ser soberano.

Não será um erro nosso(maximalistas), queremos que TODOS sejam soberanos?

Nós queremos a massificação da utilização do bitcoin, não podemos exigir aos novos utilizadores se transformem em nerds, porque eles nunca o serão, a única maneira é a tecnologia adaptar-se a eles.

Para existir uma massificação, os produtos têm que ser menos nerds e mais user-friendly. E cada vez será pior, porque estas novas gerações são cada vez mais preguiçosas, tudo o que for mais que três cliques é complicado demais e desistem… 

Isto não significa que descartaremos o jargão, Not your Keys, Not your Coins, porque sempre será um pilar do bitcoin, mas outro pilar é a liberdade. Se existem pessoas que não querem ser soberanas, não querem ter a responsabilidade de guardar a seed, têm todo o direito de o não fazer e ao mesmo tempo serem bitcoiners.

O Bitcoin permite liberdade de escolha, oposto à banca do mundo FIAT, onde somos obrigados a ter contas custodiais e com reserva fracionária.

Temos que colocar os pratos na balança, o que é mais mais seguro? Ter btc numa exchange ou numa HW custodial?

Neste caso específico, não tenho quaisquer dúvidas que a HW custodial é a melhor solução. É mais seguro para a pessoa em questão e para todos nós, porque btcs em exchanges, existe um alto risco de reserva fracionária e/ou uma falência afetará fortemente o preço mercado,  como aconteceu com FTX.

Assim faz sentido existir HW custodial para um público que quer e necessita do bitcoin mas não quer ser soberano.

Nós puristas também temos que mudar, temos que ser mais educativos. Não podemos aconselhar cegamente HW não-custodial, temos que analizar a pessoa e aconselhar o melhor que se adapta aquele perfil.

Possivelmente, com o tempo vão ganhar experiência, perder o medo e poderão mudar para não-custodial.

Nós puristas não podemos ser irredutível, a HW não-custodial não é a única solução, é sem qualquer dúvida a mais segura. Mas existem vários niveis de segurança, cada um tem os seus prós e contras e as pessoas terão de escolher o nível que melhor se adapta ao seu perfil.

Eu conheço uma pessoa na qual, nunca na minha vida, vou aconselhar uma HW não-custodial. Está constantemente a perder objetos e a esquecer passwords, é super despistado. Colocando os pratos na balança, a probabilidade de ele ser confiscado pelo estado(no próximo ano) é baixo, mas a probabilidade de ele perder a seed é extremamente alta, por isso, este tipo de pessoa necessita de uma carteira custodial.

---

Isto leva-nos a outra questão, por quanto mais tempo será possivel comprar uma HW não-custodial?

As regulamentações vão proibi-las e depois só mesmo o nerds poderão ter, porque só eles terão conhecimento para a construir, como as SeedSigner.

---

Texto original em http://www.rei-artur.com/carteira-custodial/ a 26 de Maio de 2023

@ e97aaffa:2ebd765d

A obsessão cega para a descarbonização está a levar as pessoas e políticos a tomar medidas/ações irracionais, histéricas e com toques totalitários. Para existir uma verdadeira transição energética, essa deve ser planeada e não pode ser realizada em cima do joelho, como está agora a ser feita.

Esta histeria começa logo no topo, em altos cargos políticos, como o vídeo criado pela ONU.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrjoVjSTyfg

Durante uma manifestação, os alunos fecharam a escola e recorde-me a declaração de uma adolescente para a jornalista:

“Não vale apenas estudar, porque daqui a meia dúzia de anos estamos todos mortos”.

O fundamentalismo não está a acontecer só de um lado, está a acontecer de ambos os lado. Tanto do lado dos negacionistas, como no lado que fazem acreditar que vamos todos morrer amanhã. O meio, o centro é o equilíbrio de tudo.

A transmissão de mensagens fundamentalistas, como o caso do vídeo, estão a criar mais problemas, em vez de soluções. Eu concordo que devemos descarbonizar a economia, mas essa mudança deve ser planeada, feita com racionalidade e sem histerismo.

Este histerismo, indiretamente, está a causar mais mortes do que as alterações climáticas. O mundo, especialmente a Europa devido a pressões destes movimentos, fechou centrais termoelétricas de carvão e substituiu por gás. O Putin viu que a Europa estava debilitada devido ao Covid e fortemente dependente do gás russo, era o momento certo para atacar a Ucrânia. Assim o fez, agora a Europa anda a financiar a guerra dos dois lados, a Ucrânia com armamento e ao mesmo tempo a financiar a Rússia, através do gás.

Esta guerra criou uma crise energética na Europa, sobretudo no inverno passado, mesmo em plena crise, a Alemanha fechou as suas centrais nucleares, devido a pressões de ambientalista fundamentalista. Não faz qualquer sentido fechar as centrais nucleares quando estamos em crise, e muito menos faz sentido reabrir as centrais de carvão. Não seria mais inteligente manter as centrais nucleares abertas, por mais meia dúzia de anos até que seja criada uma energia alternativa, a energia nuclear é a menos poluente.

Fundamentalismo

Mais que uma crise energética, a Europa está com uma crise de valores e sobretudo de inteligência.

Depois aprovam projetos que abatem árvores para colocar painéis solares, onde está a racionalidade disto…

Estes movimentos ambientalistas estão a ser bipolares, ao mesmo tempo que defendem os carros elétricos, são contra a exploração de lítio. 

Como é que querem fazer as baterias para os carros elétricos?

As eólicas também parecem ser um problemas para as aves.

Eu começo a chegar à conclusão que a solução aceite pelos ambientalistas é andarmos a pé e viver à luz da vela.

A irracionalidade já começa a se transformar em estupidez, agora são movimentos que  então esvaziaram os pneus de suv ou jeep. 

A loucura está a chegar à alimentação, desde da possibilidade de confiscar exploração agrícolas, taxar os peidos das vacas ou de usar latrinas. 

Se não podemos comer carne, vamos comer o que? Soja? 

A soja é a principal responsável pela desflorestação, a nível mundial.

Assim temos que juntar, além do andar a pé e viver à luz da vela, a alimentação à base de ar…

Fora de brincadeira, qualquer coisa que fazemos terá sempre impacto ambiental, temos que optar pela que tem menos impacto e que seja equilibrada e racional. 

Futuro

Eu acredito que o futuro da energia será a fusão nuclear, mas isso só acontecerá dentro de algumas décadas, espero ainda estar vivo para ver a dominância desta energia.

Mas até lá, temos mais de 8 mil milhões de pessoas para sustentar e a solução é a diversificação de fontes de energia, onde os principais intervenientes serão a fissão nuclear, eólica e solar e como backup o hídrico e o gás. 

Nos meios de transportes a opção são os elétricos e o hidrogénio.

O solar e o eólico tem um grande problema, são energia intermitentes e não controláveis, estamos dependentes das condições meteorológicas. Por esse motivo é importante ter energia backup, sempre que existir pouco vento ou sol, essa energia entra em ação, são elas a hídrica e o gás. No caso de Portugal temos um outro problema, anos após anos chove menos e estamos quase sempre em seca, vamos produzir cada vez menos energia hídrica.

Estas energias intermitência irão causar um grande problema no futuro.

A capacidade mundial de produção de eletricidade a partir de fontes renováveis deverá multiplicar-se por três este ano face ao aumento dos preços dos combustíveis fósseis e as preocupações com a segurança energética, dois fatores que, segundo a Agência Internacional de Energia “impulsionam uma forte implantação da energia solar fotovoltaica e eólica“. in Eco

No mundo, as renováveis estão com um crescimento muito acelerado, mas este crescimento não está a ser acompanhado com a construção de equipamentos de armazenamentos de emergência. Isto significa que em breve vamos ter um grande problema, com o excesso de produção.

Isto é mais um exemplo crasso de falta de planeamento e visão a longo prazo, de políticos que só pensam na próxima eleição. Outro problema é que as tecnologias de armazenamento ainda não estão muito desenvolvidas.

Em Portugal apenas temos barragens que fazem a bombagem da água, outros países têm projetos com baterias em tamanho industrial, mas não é suficiente terá que ser criadas ou desenvolvidas novas ideias mas isto vai demorar muitos anos. Mas o problema do excesso de produção será para breve.

De problema a solução

Este excesso de produção vai ter um custo elevado para as populações. Daqui a meia dúzia de anos, quando esse excesso de energia for mais regular, os políticos vão finalmente perceber que tem um grave problema em mãos e possivelmente a única solução a curto prazo é o mineração de Bitcoin (POW).

Quero ver como vão descalçar esta bota, durante anos demonizaram o POW, agora será a solução… 

Como se tem provado no Texas, o POW é a solução ideal para o balanceamento da grid.

No seguinte gráfico é sobre o funcionamento do grid no Texas. O POW apenas funciona quando existe muita produção de energia. Sempre que existe o pico de consumo, naturalmente o preço da energia aumenta e as máquinas de mining são desligadas.

Quando realmente existir o problema, daqui a 4 a 5 anos, espero que a má imagem criada por políticos e transmitida à população esteja ultrapassada. 

A utilização do gás metano, ainda está numa fase inicial, mas vai crescer nos próximos anos, terá um papel fundamental para essa mudança. Eu acredito que isto vai provocar uma mudança, de como as pessoas olham para o Bitcoin, vão finalmente perceber que não está a destruir o ambiente.

Na realidade o POW, nunca foi um problema para os políticos, apenas uma desculpa, o verdadeiro problema é que os políticos querem evitar a adoção do Bitcoin. Os políticos são desonestos, não querem perder o poder de imprimir infinitamente dinheiro, de colocar o povo a pagar pelos erros que eles próprios cometeram. A expansão monetária é um imposto oculto.

Os políticos querem  evitar que as pessoas olhem para o bitcoin como uma moeda alternativa, como uma reserva de valor, já que as moedas FIAT perderam essa característica em 1971. Este é o verdadeiro medo dos políticos, as populações descartam as moedas estatais.

Nunca esquecer que estes são, os principais objectivos do Bitcoin: * Separar o poder político, da política monetária. * Reserva de valor

Se o problema é apenas a poluição, porque os políticos não proíbem apenas a mineração que utiliza energias de origem fóssil? Mas não, os políticos estão a tentar proibir toda a mineração, mesmo aquela que tem obrigação renováveis ou através de metano.

As proibições e limitações não acontecem apenas na mineração, as regulamentações aprovadas nos últimos tempos estão restringindo a utilização do Bitcoin e a sua auto-custódia.

---

Texto originalmente publicado em http://www.rei-artur.com/pow-de-problema-a-solucao/ a 7 de Junho de 2023

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🔒💻🌐 Alerta de Segurança Cibernética! Hackers apoiados pela Coreia do Norte foram identificados invadindo a plataforma JumpCloud, com o objetivo de atingir clientes de criptomoedas. A JumpCloud, uma empresa de gerenciamento de identidade baseada em nuvem, sofreu um ataque sofisticado liderado por agentes cibernéticos norte-coreanos. Esse incidente representa uma séria ameaça à segurança dos dados e ativos digitais dos usuários de criptomoedas.

Para obter mais detalhes sobre essa invasão e entender melhor como proteger seus ativos digitais, leia a notícia completa em: Leia mais

SegurançaCibernética #Hackers #CoreiadoNorte #Criptomoedas #JumpCloud

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

📱💥 Remini domina a App Store com suas Fotos de Rosto Virais de IA, mas enfrenta críticas por suas Edições Corporais extremas! 💥📸

O aplicativo Remini está causando sensação na App Store com suas impressionantes fotos de rosto geradas por inteligência artificial, cativando os usuários em todo o mundo. No entanto, nem tudo são elogios para esse app popular. Alguns usuários estão expressando preocupações em relação às suas edições corporais, que estão sendo consideradas excessivas e pouco realistas.

Remini permite que os usuários transformem suas fotos comuns em retratos de alta qualidade, utilizando tecnologia de IA de ponta. Os resultados impressionantes têm atraído muita atenção nas redes sociais e impulsionado sua popularidade.

Porém, críticos apontam que, embora as edições faciais sejam realistas e fascinantes, as edições corporais parecem ir longe demais, criando imagens que podem promover padrões corporais irreais e prejudiciais.

Se você está curioso(a) para saber mais sobre essa controvérsia e as maravilhas da tecnologia por trás do Remini, leia a notícia completa aqui: 👉 https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/remini-lidera-a-app-store-com-suas

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

📱💬 Novo recurso do WhatsApp permite reações em mensagens para uma comunicação mais dinâmica!

O WhatsApp, o aplicativo de mensagens mais popular do mundo, acaba de lançar uma emocionante atualização que tornará as conversas ainda mais dinâmicas e interativas! Agora, os usuários poderão reagir às mensagens recebidas com uma variedade de emojis, adicionando uma nova camada de expressão às interações.

Com esse recurso, os destinatários poderão demonstrar suas emoções e opiniões de forma rápida e divertida, seja com um simples "curtir", uma reação de risada, amor, surpresa e muitas outras opções disponíveis. Isso possibilitará uma comunicação mais enriquecedora e instantânea, sem a necessidade de digitar respostas longas.

Se você é um amante das conversas no WhatsApp e deseja deixar suas interações ainda mais interessantes, essa novidade é para você! Acesse o link abaixo para ler a notícia completa e saiba como utilizar esse novo recurso e deixar suas conversas mais envolventes!

Leia a notícia completa em: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/novo-recurso-do-whatsapp-permite

WhatsApp #NovoRecurso #MensagensInterativas #Emojis #ComunicaçãoDinâmica

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🔗🚀 O Futuro do Blockchain e Criptomoedas 🌐💰

O blockchain e as criptomoedas estão moldando um futuro promissor, oferecendo um universo de oportunidades para os 8 bilhões de habitantes do nosso planeta! Descubra como essas tecnologias revolucionárias estão transformando setores, criando novos modelos de negócios e impactando a vida de pessoas ao redor do mundo. Quer saber mais? Leia a notícia completa aqui: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/o-futuro-do-blockchain-e-criptomoedas

Blockchain #Criptomoedas #Tecnologia #Futuro #Oportunidades #TechNews

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

📢🔥🇸🇻 Os títulos de El Salvador dispararam junto com o Bitcoin em 2023! 🚀💹

Em uma reviravolta surpreendente, os títulos do governo de El Salvador tiveram um desempenho excepcional e acompanharam o crescimento do Bitcoin este ano. A adoção do Bitcoin como moeda de curso legal no país abriu novas oportunidades e atraíram investidores de todo o mundo.

A medida histórica de El Salvador em aceitar o Bitcoin como moeda oficial impulsionou a confiança dos investidores, resultando em um aumento notável nos títulos do governo salvadorenho. O fenômeno é um sinal claro do impacto positivo que a criptomoeda está tendo na economia do país.

Essa relação simbiótica entre os títulos de El Salvador e o Bitcoin tem sido amplamente analisada pelos especialistas financeiros e pode servir de exemplo para outros países considerarem o potencial das criptomoedas em suas economias.

🔍📖 Para ler a notícia completa (em português), acesse: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/os-titulos-de-el-salvador-dispararam

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🚀💰🔍 BlackRock ETF Potencializaria a Mineração de Bitcoin 🔍💰🚀

A BlackRock, renomada empresa de gestão de investimentos, está considerando lançar um novo ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund) focado em criptomoedas, o que poderia impulsionar significativamente a indústria de mineração de Bitcoin. O ETF permitiria que investidores obtenham exposição ao mercado de criptoativos de forma mais fácil e segura.

O possível lançamento desse ETF abre portas para um aumento no interesse de investidores institucionais no mercado de criptomoedas, o que poderia resultar em um influxo de capital para a mineração de Bitcoin. Essa perspectiva animadora pode levar a um aumento na demanda por equipamentos de mineração e, consequentemente, à expansão das operações de mineração em todo o mundo.

No entanto, a notícia também traz à tona discussões sobre os impactos ambientais da mineração de Bitcoin, já que o processo requer considerável energia elétrica. Portanto, é importante acompanhar como a indústria se adaptará a essa nova fase de crescimento, buscando soluções sustentáveis e ecologicamente responsáveis.

Leia mais sobre essa notícia promissora e seus possíveis desdobramentos no mundo das criptomoedas no artigo original: Leia aqui

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🌐💼📰 RFK Jr. Planeja Apoiar o Dólar com Bitcoin - Uma Proposta de Impacto Financeiro Global

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., ativista e advogado, surpreendeu o mundo financeiro ao anunciar uma proposta ambiciosa: apoiar o dólar americano com Bitcoin. Essa iniciativa poderia ter implicações profundas e globais para o sistema financeiro.

A proposta de RFK Jr. consiste em vincular o valor do dólar a uma quantidade específica de Bitcoin, visando estabilizar a moeda americana e mitigar a inflação. A combinação de uma moeda tradicional com uma criptomoeda emergente pode ter efeitos imprevisíveis, mas também abre oportunidades para uma maior integração de tecnologia no setor financeiro.

A adoção do Bitcoin como um ativo de reserva pode trazer benefícios, como maior transparência nas transações e redução de interferência governamental no sistema monetário. No entanto, também suscita preocupações sobre a volatilidade do Bitcoin e possíveis riscos para a estabilidade financeira.

Neste momento, a proposta de RFK Jr. ainda está em estágio inicial, e sua viabilidade dependerá de uma análise aprofundada por parte de especialistas em economia e finanças. Independentemente do resultado final, essa iniciativa certamente atrairá muita atenção e discussão em todo o mundo.

Para ler a notícia completa, clique aqui: RFK Jr. Planeja Apoiar o Dólar com Bitcoin

📢 #TechNews #Bitcoin #Dólar #Economia #Finanças #Criptomoedas #RFKJr #InovaçãoFinanceira

@ a8d525f8:eba07693

The digital era came on hard and fast. I got my first real taste of it in primary school, in the early 90s. My cohort and I were assigned pen-pals (from other participating schools) and were tasked with writing them a letter on the computer. Normally we would print this letter and mail it, but this time we were going to send it electronically. That's right... electronical mail. Like a monkey sent to space, I corresponded by e-mail before its rise to dominance. And it was magical.

Fast forward a bit. I was responsible for onboarding a lot of friends and family to Gmail, back when it was still invite-only. This was also around the time that Myspace was in its death rattle and the new, cool, and clean version was launched. It was called Facebook. Other great apps included ICQ and MSN Messenger.

All was well. It was fantastically convenient to be able to jump on a computer, at home, and write my friends--until someone needed to use the phone (IYKYK). That's about as functional and layered as any of us ever needed it to be. But, as we all know, that's not how it would remain for long.

Point is, I grew up through the tech boom. I've taken it for granted. Recently, however, life smacked me around (a story for another time) and forced me to take a long, hard look at things affecting my health; including my digital hygiene.

I've realized, when it comes down to it, I could give a fuck about participating in this algorithm-driven, dopamine-maximizing, engagement-at-all-cost, advertiser-catering, user-as-product, mind-numbing, echo chamber bullshit. I don't like it. I don't like the way it makes me feel. I don't like the behavior it elicits.

I have an exponentially declining threshold for the mode by which the corporatized Internet operates. I feel that disengaging from the bulk of it is necessary to stave off any further damage it may cause, or vulnerabilities it may create. And, in doing so, distance myself from companies that clearly do not have our well-being in mind.

When it comes to earning a living, however, the Internet is a tool that simply can't be entirely discarded. I make stuff and share it, online, with those that wish to know about it. But it would seem that in a lot of instances, the cost has come to outweigh the convenience.

To curtail this, moving forward, I will favor and adopt (whenever possible) platforms and tools that are decentralized, privacy-focused, censorship-resistant, permissionless, and accessible to all--what is being touted as "freedom tech". To me, it's an echo of the Internet I was introduced to.

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

🚀💰 O Mercado Bitcoin está inovando mais uma vez! Agora, os usuários poderão transformar seus pagamentos via Pix em uma 'ordem de compra' de criptomoedas. Essa nova funcionalidade promete agilizar ainda mais as transações e tornar o processo de aquisição de criptos mais prático e rápido.

Com a implantação desse mecanismo, o Mercado Bitcoin busca proporcionar uma experiência ainda mais conveniente aos seus clientes, permitindo que eles utilizem o Pix - um dos meios de pagamento mais populares do Brasil - para investir em criptomoedas de forma direta e descomplicada.

Quer saber mais detalhes sobre essa novidade empolgante? Confira a notícia completa no link abaixo:

Leia a notícia completa: https://technewsbr.substack.com/p/mercado-bitcoin-implanta-mecanismo

@ 4ac847f3:16dc6c5a

@ fa6afdb4:aee9b046

In Buddhism, suffering is not caused by pain, sadness, or meaninglessness. It is caused by our incessant and futile pursuit of fleeting emotions. This pursuit leaves us in a constant state of tension, dissatisfaction, and restlessness. Even in moments of pleasure, our minds are not satisfied, because we fear the transience of these feelings and yearn for their intensification and preservation.

True liberation from suffering comes from recognising the impermanence of all feelings and releasing our cravings for them. This is the ultimate goal of Buddhist meditation.

In meditation, we closely observe our minds and bodies, acknowledging the perpetual rise and fall of all feelings. We realise that the pursuit of pleasure is futile, and we relinquish our desires. Once we do this, our minds relax, clear, and find contentment.

Every kind of feeling continues to emerge - joy, anger, boredom, lust - but by freeing ourselves from specific cravings, we learn to accept them as they are. We live in the present moment instead of indulging in fantasies of what could have been.

The resulting tranquillity is so profound that those who live their lives pursuing pleasant sensations can hardly conceive of it. It is like a man who has spent years standing on the seashore, desperately grasping onto "good" waves and pushing back "bad" ones. Day in and day out, he goes on this way until finally, he sits down on the sand and allows the waves to come and go as they please. How peaceful!

---

This article was generated with the help of an AI language model.

@ 6b40efd8:b9dad5f5

Hoy, coincidiendo con la resaca de las elecciones, me he dado cuenta que el banco me ha bloqueado la cuenta bancaria, por segunda vez y sin previo aviso, impidiéndome recibir ingresos y pagos de mis clientes desde la semana pasada. Me he enterado al ver que no me había recibido ninguno de los pagos previstos. Según el Banco Santander, el bloqueo se debe a la falta de la firma de un documento, el FIOC (Formulario de Información Obligatoria del Cliente), una especie de KYC más profundo y recurrente. Tras la firma por tercera vez del documento, parece que ya me van a desbloquear la cuenta, pero todavía tengo que esperar, al menos, 48 horas para recibir mi dinero. Desde luego la sensación de no disponer de tu propio dinero es impotencia y rabia a partes iguales. El resultado directo es que te das de frente con la cruda realidad una vez más, el dinero en el Banco, no es tu dinero.

Después de estos dos hechos, en principio sin mucha relación entre ellos, he encontrado disfrutando de una serenidad absoluta. Ahora me siento todavía más seguro de que todo paso hacia conseguir ser completamente independiente del Estado, y sus redes clientelares, es un paso imprescindible y el único camino que nos acerca a la libertad. Tras estos hechos viene a mi mente una simple reflexión. Cuando hablamos de libertad, ¿tiene algún sentido ponerle precio? ¿Podemos pensar que es cara o barata?

Yo lo tengo claro ¿Y tú?

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

La joven cubana Ruselay Castillo Matos, de 31 años, fue asesinada por su pareja el pasado 18 de julio en la comunidad del central Humberto Álvarez, en Cárdenas, Matanzas, según confirmaron plataformas feministas independientes cubanas.

En las redes sociales de Yo Sí Te Creo en Cuba, las activistas lamentaron este terrible suceso, explicando que a la víctima le sobreviven dos hijos adolescentes.

Con este crimen, las plataformas cubanas contabilizan de forma independiente 54 hechos calificados como feminicidios y tres intentos de feminicidios. Tales cifras representan apenas un subregistro, pues al no contar con la información oficial que debería proporcionar el gobierno, apenas se suman los casos que se llegan a conocer.

Los 54 feminicidios durante los primeros siete meses del año superan los 34 confirmados de manera independiente durante todo el 2022, en un creciente contexto de violencia que se extiende a toda la población, pero en el caso de las mujeres se complejiza al añadirse el problema del género.

En el mismo post, Yo Sí Te Creo en Cuba actualiza información sobre el asesinato de la transexual cubana Anna Teudy Hernández en Grecia, alegando que, dada la información difundida por la prensa de ese país, pueden concluir que el caso califica como feminicidio.

Además, se recuerda que la semana pasada las autoridades de la nación europea identificaron y arrestaron al presunto homicida. La plataforma explica que en cuanto al subregistro de feminicidios de cubanas en el extranjero, el total de estos crímenes se comunica al cierre de cada año, por lo que todavía no se sabe cuántos han sucedido en esta primera mitad del 2023.

Ante la inacción del régimen cubano, las feministas independientes han dispuesto varios medios de contacto para que las mujeres que enfrentan violencia encuentren distintos tipos de ayuda. Tales son:

yositecreoencuba@gmail.com, +34-624-88-30-48; observatorio@alastensas.com

Mientras en las redes sociales continúan los reportes de mujeres asesinadas en Cuba, algunas incluso pese a haber acudido a las autoridades ante el temor de ser ultimadas, el presidente designado del país continúa restándole importancia al problema.

El jueves pasado, frente a los diputados de la Asamblea Nacional, Miguel Díaz-Canel sostuvo que se “exageran” los casos de violencia de género en Cuba, recurriendo a la costumbre de culpar al “imperialismo” por presuntamente tratar de socavar la opinión pública sobre el país caribeño.

“Constantemente se exagera cualquier hecho delictivo, fundamentalmente los casos con violencia y, en particular, los de violencia de género”, refirió.

@ 975f35d5:189a934a

Writing on Pret A Manger as former staff from a behind the scenes look via expret.org

PretAManger #Pret #itsu

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

The Sovereignty of the Individual Versus the State - A Delicate Balance

The sovereignty of the individual, the principle that defends individual rights to self-determination, is instrumental for the flourishing of human freedom. However, in a growing age of state surveillance and governmental regulation, there is continuous tension between individual freedom and state control under the pretext of "common safety". The dynamics between these two elements expose the need for individuals to actively fight for their own sovereignty.

Individual Sovereignty - The Foundation of Freedom

The sovereignty of the individual is key to promoting human freedom. This notion, deeply rooted in core values such as personal autonomy, freedom of choice, and inalienable rights, is essential to creating a prosperous society of free and responsible individuals. These principles facilitate the expression of our humanity and enable us to live full and authentic lives.

However, in a time of increasing government control and influence, this fundamental freedom is under threat. The idea that the state has the right to intervene in the personal life of the individual to protect the "common good" is being increasingly used to justify measures that restrict individual freedom.

Governments around the world are becoming increasingly omnipresent, extending their influence into spheres once considered a private domain. Policies relating to security, public health, information control, and economic regulation are being used as tools of control over individuals.

Massive surveillance through advanced technologies, censorship, and manipulation of information, the imposition of restrictions in the name of national security or public health – these are just a few examples of how state control can infiltrate and restrict our right to individual sovereignty.

For instance, in the digital age we live in, privacy, a crucial right in individual sovereignty, is being eroded. Information about our daily lives, thoughts, and behaviors is collected, analyzed, and stored without our explicit consent. This phenomenon is often justified by the need for security or efficiency, but it can leave us vulnerable to privacy breaches and manipulation.

The escalating erosion of individual rights in the name of government control presents a concerning picture for the preservation of individual sovereignty. But instead of being mere spectators of this phenomenon, we should become active participants in protecting and reaffirming our sovereignty. Awareness, education, responsibility, and action are the tools we have in our arsenal to ensure that individual sovereignty remains a reality, not just a theoretical idea.

The State - Guardian or Restrictor of Freedom?

In many countries, the State takes on the responsibility of protecting its citizens, monitoring and intervening in key aspects of individual life to ensure "common security and prosperity". But, this protection often involves a compromise of personal freedoms and individual sovereignty.

Strict regulations, invasive surveillance, and control over means of communication can limit freedom of speech, freedom of movement, and personal privacy of individuals. Under the veil of "national security" or "public health", these restrictions can be categorized by authorities as necessary, creating a seemingly incontrovertible justification for eroding individual sovereignty.

The Need for Individual Struggle

Faced with these challenges, it becomes imperative that each person actively seeks and fights relentlessly for the guarantee of their personal sovereignty. This is not a call for anarchy or a total rejection of the role of the State, but rather a strong and clear call for recognition and conscious claim of individual rights.

In a democracy, the primary purpose of the State is becoming a servant of the citizens - and the notion of "collective security" should not serve as a convenient excuse for curtailing individual freedom. Therefore, there are several strategies that each of us can adopt in the fight for the preservation and expansion of our sovereignty.

Education about Individual Rights

Knowing your rights is the first step to protecting them. Civic education programs, workshops, seminars, and online resources can help each one understand the rights they hold and how these rights can be protected.

Digital Prudence

With the digitalization of the world, it is crucial to highlight the importance of online security measures, such as the use of encryption protocols, recognizing the importance of informed consent in data sharing, and promoting privacy tools.

Legality of the Right of Resistance

In certain situations, individuals may have the legal right to resist laws or regulations that they perceive as violations of their sovereignty. This resistance may take several forms, from lawsuits to peaceful demonstrations and civil disobedience.

By adopting these strategies, we can move towards a society where individuality is respected and individual sovereignty is upheld. It's a path that requires constant vigilance, but it is essential to ensure our personal freedom and to preserve our dignity.

Conclusion

The sovereignty of the individual and the State can coexist, but this is a delicate balance that requires constant maintenance. Individual sovereignty must be protected and promoted, even in the face of expansive state control. After all, it is in respect and support of individual autonomy and freedom that true democracy thrives. Constant vigilance against the erosion of individual sovereignty is, therefore, an imperative for all conscious citizens. To keep the values of freedom, privacy, and self-determination alive in our modern world, we must actively seek and defend our individual sovereignty.

@ 6e0a1f48:c9f444e5

A Soberania do Indivíduo Versus o Estado - Um Balanço Delicado

A soberania do indivíduo, o princípio que defende os direitos individuais à autodeterminação, é fundamental para o florescimento da liberdade humana. No entanto, em uma era crescente de vigilância estatal e regulação governamental, há uma tensão contínua entre a liberdade individual e o controle estatal com a desculpa do interesse da "segurança comum". A dinâmica entre estes dois elementos expõe a necessidade dos indivíduos lutarem ativamente pela sua própria soberania.

Soberania individual - A pedra angular da liberdade

A soberania do indivíduo é fundamental para a promoção da liberdade humana. Esta noção, profundamente enraizada em valores fundamentais como a autonomia pessoal, a liberdade de escolha e os direitos inalienáveis, é essencial para a criação de uma sociedade próspera de indivíduos livres e responsáveis. São estes princípios que facilitam a expressão da nossa humanidade e permitem-nos viver vidas plenas e autênticas.

No entanto, numa época de aumento do controle e influência governamental, esta liberdade fundamental está sob ameaça. A ideia de que o Estado tem o direito de intervir na vida pessoal do indivíduo para proteger o "bem comum" está sendo cada vez mais utilizada para justificar medidas que restringem a liberdade individual.

Governos ao redor do mundo estão se tornando cada vez mais omnipresentes, estendendo sua influência em esferas que antes eram consideradas domínio privado. As políticas relacionadas à segurança, saúde pública, controle de informações e regulação da economia estão sendo utilizadas como instrumentos de controle sobre os indivíduos.

A vigilância maciça através de tecnologias avançadas, a censura e manipulação de informações, a imposição de restrições em nome da segurança nacional ou saúde pública - estes são apenas alguns exemplos de como o controle estatal pode se infiltrar e restringir nosso direito à soberania individual.

Por exemplo, na era digital em que vivemos, a privacidade, um direito crucial na soberania individual, está sendo erodida. Informações sobre nossas vidas diárias, pensamentos e comportamentos são coletadas, analisadas e armazenadas sem o nosso consentimento explícito. Este fenômeno é muitas vezes justificado pela necessidade de segurança ou eficiência, entretanto, pode nos deixar vulneráveis a violações de privacidade e manipulação.

A crescente erosão dos direitos individuais em nome do controle governamental apresenta um quadro preocupante para a preservação da soberania individual. Mas ao invés de ser meros expectadores deste fenômeno, devemos nos tornar participantes ativos na proteção e reafirmação de nossa soberania. Conscientização, educação, responsabilidade e ação são as ferramentas que temos em nosso arsenal para garantir que a soberania do indivíduo permaneça uma realidade, e não apenas uma ideia teórica.

O Estado como Guardião ou Limitador da Liberdade?

Em muitos países, o Estado assume a responsabilidade de proteger seus cidadãos, monitorando e intervindo em aspectos-chave da vida individual para garantir a "segurança e prosperidade comum". Mas, essa proteção frequentemente implica num comprometimento das liberdades pessoais e da soberania individual.

Regulações rigorosas, vigilância invasiva e controle sobre os meios de comunicação podem limitar a liberdade de expressão, a liberdade de movimento e a privacidade pessoal dos indivíduos. Sob o véu de "segurança nacional" ou "saúde pública", essas limitações podem ser categorizadas pelas autoridades como necessárias, criando uma justificativa aparentemente incontestável para erodir a soberania individual.

A Necessidade da Luta Individual

Perante os desafios apresentados, torna-se imperativo que cada pessoa procure activamente e lute incansavelmente pela garantia da sua soberania pessoal. Este não é um apelo ao anarquismo ou uma rejeição total do papel do Estado, mas sim um forte e claro apelo para o reconhecimento e a reivindicação consciente dos direitos individuais.

Numa democracia, a finalidade primária do Estado é tornar-se um servidor dos cidadãos - e a noção de "segurança colectiva" não deveria servir como desculpa conveniente para coartar a liberdade individual. Sendo assim, existem várias estratégias que cada um de nós pode adoptar na luta pela preservação e expansão da nossa soberania.

Educação sobre direitos individuais

Conhecer os seus direitos é o primeiro passo para protegê-los. Programas de educação cívica, workshops, seminários e recursos online podem ajudar cada um a entender os direitos que possui e como esses direitos podem ser protegidos.

Prudência Digital

Com a digitalização do mundo, é crucial realçar a importância de medidas de segurança online, como a utilização de protocolos de encriptação, reconhecendo a importância do consentimento informado na partilha de dados e a promoção de ferramentas de privacidade.

Legalidade do Direito de Resitência

Em determinadas situações, os indivíduos podem ter o direito legal de resistir a leis ou regulamentos que percepcionem como violações da sua soberania. Esta resistência pode assumir várias formas, desde processos judiciais a manifestações pacíficas e desobediência civil.

Ao adoptarmos estas estratégias, podemos mover-nos em direcção a uma sociedade onde a individualidade é respeitada e a soberania do indivíduo é mantida. Trata-se de um caminho que requer vigilância constante, mas é essencial para garantir a nossa liberdade pessoal e preservar a nossa dignidade.

Conclusão

A soberania do indivíduo e o Estado podem coexistir, mas este é um equilíbrio delicado que requer manutenção constante. A soberania individual deve ser protegida e promovida, mesmo em face do controle estatal expansivo. Afinal, é no respeito e no apoio à autonomia e liberdade individuais que a verdadeira democracia prospera. A vigilância constante contra a erosão da soberania individual é, portanto, um imperativo para todos os cidadãos conscientes. Para mantermos vivos os valores de liberdade, privacidade e autodeterminação em nosso mundo moderno, devemos ativamente buscar e defender nossa soberania individual.

@ b28b00b0:75d2abf4

~~Biip~~ Boop!

1...2..3

| Key | Value | | --- | --- | | Name | Sven | | Age | 100 |

Now it's updated!

...and again!

...and a third time!

...and a fourth time!

@ f821179b:ed4fd022

Primal.net is a bit new so it’s still a work in progress but is quickly becoming one of my favorite clients. It took some time before they were able to implement “zaps”, and their direct message feature is still being developed. However, everything that is currently functional works very well. It has become my go-to web client because I find it reliable. If I want to check my latest notifications, Primal is now my first choice—it was Iris previously—as it often shows me notifications that other clients miss for some reason. I assume this discrepancy is relay-related.

Primal offers several interesting features worth exploring. For example, their in-depth statistics tab shows useful information about what’s trending across Nostr, which accounts are receiving the most zaps, which notes are getting the most attention, the total number of users on the network, the total number of reactions, and so on. You can find all of this under their ‘Explore’ tab. Viewing these statistics provides a fascinating insight into the ecosystem.

Custom feeds are another great feature that Primal offers on their client. You can see what's popular and trending in multiple different ways. For example, do you want to know which accounts are getting the most zaps? There's a custom feed for that. Interested in seeing what someone else's feed looks like? You can visit their profile and create a custom feed for yourself. Curious about what's trending across your network, including your followers and those you follow, as well as those they follow? There's a custom feed for that as well. You can even follow hashtags or specific keywords if you prefer, and turn them into a custom feed. The level of customization and the way your media is presented to you is clearly a key area of focus for the Primal team.

Primal has recently released the beta version of its iOS app. It’s not yet available on the App Store. However, if you’re interested in trying it out, you can visit https://primal.net/downloads After signing up and downloading “TestFlight”, you’ll be able to take the app for a test run or “flight,” if you will. One aspect that immediately stood out to me when first using the app was their excellently implemented Zaps integration. Primal guides you through the process of linking your GetAlby account with the app, facilitating frictionless zapping and creating a seamless experience. I find myself using the Primal app as frequently as I use Damus. Currently, these two apps are my go-to options for iOS.

I'm eagerly anticipating how Primal will evolve and grow as they refine and perfect their client.

@ 7d9564f8:1bab2932

My boby post

@ fa6afdb4:aee9b046

Meditation is a practice that involves training the mind to focus and redirect thoughts. One common meditation technique is to focus on the breath and bring awareness to different parts of the body. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you with this practice:

1. Find a quiet and comfortable place where you can sit or lie down without any distractions. You may choose to close your eyes or keep them softly focused.
2. Begin by taking a few deep breaths to relax your body and settle your mind. Feel the sensation of the breath entering and leaving your body.
3. Once you feel centred, shift your attention to the breath. Observe the natural flow of your breath, without trying to control it. Notice how it feels as the air enters and leaves your nostrils or how your chest and abdomen rise and fall.
4. Now, bring your awareness to each part of your body, starting from the top of your head and slowly moving down. As you focus on each area, try to relax any tension you may feel. You can mentally scan your body or use your breath as a guide, imagining that you're breathing into each part.
5. Pay attention to any sensations, feelings, or even thoughts that arise as you bring your awareness to each body part. Without judgment or attachment, simply observe them and let them pass.
6. If you find your mind wandering or getting caught up in thoughts, gently bring your attention back to the breath and the body. It's normal for the mind to wander, and the practice is to gently guide it back to the present moment.
7. Continue this process, moving down your body and focusing on each part until you reach your toes. Take your time and allow yourself to fully experience the sensations and relaxation in each area.
8. If you have more time, you can choose to repeat the body scan or focus solely on the breath for an extended period.

Remember, meditation is a practice, and it may take time to develop focus and awareness. Be patient with yourself and try to approach the practice with a sense of curiosity and non-judgment. Over time, regular meditation can bring about a greater sense of calm, clarity, and overall well-being.

---

This article was generated with the help of an AI language model.

@ fa0165a0:03397073

Below is an easy-to-read list of keyboard shortcuts and commands to navigate your Linux computer efficiently: (Note that some variations between systems may apply)

General Shortcuts:
    Open Terminal: Ctrl + Alt + T
    Close current application: Alt + F4
    Switch between open applications: Alt + Tab
    Logout from current session: Ctrl + Alt + Del

Navigating the File System:
    Open File Manager (Nautilus): Super (Windows key) + E
    Move back in directory: Alt + Left Arrow
    Move forward in directory: Alt + Right Arrow
    Go to Home directory: Ctrl + H
    Go to Desktop: Ctrl + D
    Open a folder or file: Enter
    Rename a file or folder: F2
    Copy selected item: Ctrl + C
    Cut selected item: Ctrl + X
    Paste copied/cut item: Ctrl + V
    Delete selected item: Delete
    Create a new folder: Ctrl + Shift + N

Navigating Applications:
    Switch between open windows of the same application: Alt + `
    Close the current window: Ctrl + W
    Minimize the current window: Ctrl + M
    Maximize/Restore the current window: Ctrl + Super + Up Arrow / Down Arrow

Navigating Web Browsers (e.g., Firefox, Chrome):
    Open a new tab: Ctrl + T
    Close the current tab: Ctrl + W
    Switch to the next tab: Ctrl + Tab
    Switch to the previous tab: Ctrl + Shift + Tab
    Open a link in a new tab: Ctrl + Left Click
    Go back in the browser history: Alt + Left Arrow
    Go forward in the browser history: Alt + Right Arrow

System Controls:
    Lock the screen: Ctrl + Alt + L
    Open the system menu (context menu): Menu key (or Right-click key) or Shift + F10
    Open the Run Command prompt: Alt + F2

These shortcuts may vary slightly depending on the Linux distribution and desktop environment you are using. Experiment with these shortcuts to navigate your Linux system faster and more efficiently without relying on the mouse.

Since websites are such an important interface for the information of today, I have here appended the list with some navigational hotkeys for web browsers (e.g., Firefox, Chrome) on Linux:

General Navigation:
    Scroll down: Spacebar
    Scroll up: Shift + Spacebar
    Scroll horizontally: Hold Shift and scroll with the mouse wheel or arrow keys
    Go to the top of the page: Home
    Go to the bottom of the page: End
    Refresh the page: F5 or Ctrl + R
    Stop loading the page: Esc

Link and Page Navigation:
    Move focus to the next link or interactive element: Tab
    Move focus to the previous link or interactive element: Shift + Tab
    Activate/follow a link or button: Enter
    Open link in a new tab: Ctrl + Enter (Cmd + Enter on macOS)
    Open link in a new background tab: Ctrl + Shift + Enter (Cmd + Shift + Enter on macOS)
    Open link in a new window: Shift + Enter
    Go back to the previous page: Backspace or Alt + Left Arrow
    Go forward to the next page: Alt + Right Arrow

Searching:
    Find text on the page: Ctrl + F
    Find next occurrence: Ctrl + G
    Find previous occurrence: Ctrl + Shift + G

Tab Management:
    Open a new tab: Ctrl + T
    Close the current tab: Ctrl + W
    Reopen the last closed tab: Ctrl + Shift + T
    Switch to the next tab: Ctrl + Tab
    Switch to the previous tab: Ctrl + Shift + Tab
    Switch to a specific tab (numbered from left to right): Ctrl + [1-8]
    Switch to the last tab: Ctrl + 9

Form Interaction:
    Move to the next form field: Tab
    Move to the previous form field: Shift + Tab
    Check/uncheck checkboxes and radio buttons: Spacebar
    Select an option from a dropdown menu: Enter, then arrow keys to navigate options

Miscellaneous:
    Open the browser's menu: Alt (sometimes F10)
    Open the address bar (omnibox): Ctrl + L or Alt + D

Remember, the accessibility of websites can vary, and some sites might have different keyboard navigation implementations. In some cases, you may need to enable keyboard navigation in the browser's settings or extensions. Additionally, browser updates might introduce changes to keyboard shortcuts, so it's always good to check the latest documentation or help resources for your specific browser version.

But I hope this helps as an tldr and getting started with navigating your laptop the ways pro role.

Version controlled over at github gist.

@ eac63075:b4988b48

Este é um texto é baseado na transcrição do Twitter Spaces promovido pela Cointelegraph Brasil, com a participação de Edilson Osorio Jr (@eddieoz) , Pedro Magalhães e Rafaela Romano como host.

Introdução

Nos últimos anos, o mundo testemunhou um aumento significativo no uso de criptomoedas, com o Bitcoin ganhando destaque. O Brasil, como muitas outras nações, está navegando nessa nova era digital, enfrentando a introdução de sua Moeda Digital de Banco Central (CBDC), chamada Real Digital. Embora essa tecnologia ofereça um grande potencial para a inovação financeira, também traz consigo desafios, preocupações com a privacidade e ameaças potenciais às liberdades individuais. Neste artigo, vamos mergulhar nas questões que cercam a CBDC brasileira e explorar as implicações mais amplas da criptografia, Bitcoin, criptomoedas e blockchain na sociedade.

O CBDC Brasileiro - Equilibrando Vigilância e Controle

O Real Digital, distribuído pelo Banco Central do Brasil, promete trazer eficiência, transparência e inclusão de desbancarizados ao sistema financeiro. No entanto, surgem preocupações à medida que o CBDC é inicialmente lançado para corporações e instituições, com planos futuros para alcançar as carteiras dos indivíduos. Essa medida poderia resultar em vigilância em massa e questões de controle, conferindo ao governo um poder sem precedentes para monitorar as atividades financeiras dos cidadãos. Defensores da privacidade temem que tal intromissão nas finanças pessoais possa comprometer as liberdades individuais e abrir caminho para o uso autoritário dos dados financeiros.

Bitcoin como Símbolo de Liberdade

À medida que o governo brasileiro explora medidas regulatórias para a indústria de criptomoedas, o debate em torno das funções de congelamento, queima e transferência de saldos traz preocupações entre especialistas. Essas funções, se mal utilizadas, podem impactar significativamente o cidadão. Enquanto isso, amplia-se a discussão sobre a importância da inclusão financeira dos desbancarizados, e criptomoedas como o Bitcoin oferecem um caminho alternativo para que os indivíduos tenham mais controle sobre suas próprias transações financeiras. A descentralização e a capacidade de contornar intermediários financeiros tradicionais capacitam os indivíduos e promovem a liberdade financeira.

Encontrando um Equilíbrio entre Segurança e Privacidade

Governos em todo o mundo, incluindo a União Europeia, estão contemplando a criação de backdoors em sistemas criptográficos com o pretexto de combater a lavagem de dinheiro, o financiamento do terrorismo e o abuso infantil. Embora possam parecer causas justificáveis, representa sérias ameaças à privacidade e à segurança. A criptografia desempenha um papel vital na proteção das pessoas contra a vigilância e a manipulação dos governos, especialmente em uma era de crescente propaganda e manipulação nas mídias sociais. O uso de tecnologias como hardware wallets e sistemas de votação seguros destaca a importância de proteger a privacidade ao mesmo tempo em que abraçamos avanços tecnológicos.

O Futuro das Votações: Blockchain e Além

Na Estônia, a digitalização das eleições tem apresentado resultados promissores, aumentando a transparência e a eficiência, ao mesmo tempo que reduz a coerção e a compra de votos. O potencial da tecnologia blockchain para revolucionar sistemas eleitorais é significativo, oferecendo mecanismos de votação seguros e transparentes. No entanto, desafios permanecem, incluindo custos, complexidade e riscos de segurança, que requerem maior engajamento político e consenso. Sistemas financeiros acessíveis e inclusivos também desempenham um papel vital para garantir que os benefícios dos avanços tecnológicos sejam acessíveis a todos os segmentos da sociedade.

Conclusão

Conforme o Brasil embarca na jornada de seu CBDC e o mundo em geral enfrenta o impacto das criptomoedas e da tecnologia blockchain, é fundamental encontrar um delicado equilíbrio entre o progresso e a salvaguarda das liberdades individuais. Embora o potencial das criptomoedas e do blockchain seja vasto, também é crucial abordar preocupações com a privacidade, desafios regulatórios e a possibilidade de vigilância e controle governamental. A educação, o debate público e uma abordagem aberta serão fundamentais para moldar o futuro dessa tecnologia transformadora em benefício da sociedade.

---

Ouça/assista o spaces completo em: Twitter: https://twitter.com/BrCointelegraph/status/1681005732123013120 Youtube (@eddieoz): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxf3BdMOe50

@ c8df6ae8:22293a06

The Kennedy administration will begin to back the US dollar with real, finite assets such as gold, silver, platinum and Bitcoin, which is the world's hardest liquid asset, to strengthen the US dollar and guarantee its continued success as the global reserve currency.
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Welcome to the latest issue of the Bitcoin For Families newsletter. This issue covers the potential implications of a Bitcoin backed US dollar.

---

What are the implications of a Bitcoin backed US dollar?

On July 19th, presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr gave a speech at a PAC event where he declared the plans of his administration to, at least partially, back the US dollar with gold, silver, platinum and Bitcoin.

You can watch the whole 10 minutes speech here:

What could happen if RFK Jr. does get elected and goes forward with this promise? Let’s look at some scenarios.

What will the RFK administration do?

RFK Jr. said he would back 1% of the treasury bills (T-Bills) issued by the treasury with gold, silver, platinum and Bitcoin.

T-Bills are short-term securities issued by the government with a maturity rate of 4, 8,13, 17, 26 or 52 weeks. The interest rate is set based on the offers done by those bidding on the auction. For example, a recent auction of 26 week T-Bills closed with an interest rate of 5.25%.

Let’s assume that Bitcoin is priced at $32,000 US dollars and that you buy a 26 weeks T-Bill worth $100 and backed by Bitcoin. This would mean that the US government must have possession of 312,500 satoshi (0.00312500 BTC) to back this T-Bill and you should have the option to exchange the T-Bill for that amount of Bitcoin at the end of the 26 weeks.

What would happen if after 26 weeks, the US dollar became weaker than Bitcoin and the exchange rate is now $34,000? Now you only need 294,118 satoshis to back the $100 T-Bill and since the US government had set aside 312,500 satoshi, then all is good.

What would happen if after 26 weeks, the US dollar became stronger than Bitcoin and the exchange rate is now $28,000? Now you need 357,143 satoshi to back the T-Bill and since the US government had set aside 312,500 satoshi, they would need to purchase 44,643 more satoshi to continue to back the T-Bill.

I doubt the US government will be willing to take this exchange rate risk with its debt obligations.

Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the US government sets a fixed exchange rate for the maturity life of the T-Bill. Maybe equal to the exchange rate at the time of the auction.

This means that after 26 weeks you could exchange your T-Bill for 312,500 satoshi no matter what the actual exchange rate is at that point.

What will this do to the price of Bitcoin or the US dollar?

1. The US dollar will get stronger when compared against other fiat currencies not backed by anything:

   The US government will send a very strong signal to the world that Bitcoin is the new gold and a very valid store of value. The world’s hardest liquid asset.

   Therefore, backing the US dollar with Bitcoin will make the US dollar stronger when compared with other fiat currencies.

2. The US dollar will get weaker when compared against Bitcoin:

   The demand for Bitcoin by the US government will put upward pressure on the exchange rate for Bitcoin against all fiat currencies, including the US dollar.

3. A continued policy of expanding the amount of T-Bills backed by Bitcoin will only exacerbate this process, making the US dollar stronger against other countries currencies and driving the price of Bitcoin up both against the US dollar and by extension other fiat currencies (which by definition are now weaker than the US dollar).

What will investors do?

Investors will demand either the same or maybe even lower interest rates for Bitcoin backed T-Bills with the assumption that the Bitcoin amount backing the T-Bill will be worth more after 26 weeks.

The scenario where investors demand higher interest rates because they believe that Bitcoin will get weaker is unlikely since, even if this happens, the T-Bills are denominated in US dollars and investors won’t be forced to redeem the T-Bill for Bitcoin at the end of the 26 weeks.

What will other countries do?

At first, other countries will just watch and see.

But the upward pressure on the price of Bitcoin will make a US T-Bill more attractive than its European Central Bank equivalent causing the Euro to lose value compared against the US dollar.

The same applies to any other fiat currency (not backed by anything).

Other countries will be forced to back some of their short-term debt with Bitcoin to avoid having to pay higher interest rates to counteract the higher attractiveness of the US T-Bill.

The consolidation of Bitcoin as store of value

If all countries start using Bitcoin to back their debt, that will consolidate Bitcoin as the best store of value.

Bitcoin has to first settle as a store of value before it can be used as a medium of exchange and unit of account (what is commonly known as hyperbitcoinization). This possible action by the US government might well be the linchpin that triggers the hyperbitcoinization.

If the other countries do nothing, the US dollar will cement itself as the global reserve currency and the hyperbitcoinization will still happen, just a bit slower since there will be no demand from other treasuries.

---

Notable notes

nostr:note1dgh2ga7q397huzfcf9ah06ptvcxxwcmfx5yhctw0rh4t6ylvud4s0nrn75

---

Recommendations

Max DeMarco

Max is the creator of a great documentary about social media and why we need Nostr.

Watch the documentary here: You can follow Max here.

Bitcoin Therapy 🧠

Level up your Bitcoin knowledge in 3 minutes...every Sunday

Check it out here.

---

What did you think of today's newsletter?

Your feedback helps me create the best newsletter possible for you.

Please leave a comment and checkout comments from other subscribers and readers. I love hearing from the Bitcoin For Families community ❤️ 🙏🏻

---

---

Buy Bitcoin with Swan

If you want to buy Bitcoin, I highly recommend using Swan. They are a Bitcoin only business that is focused on self-custody and educating their users. It's where I buy my Bitcoin.

Use this link to receive $10 free to get you started.

---

See you again next week! — Alejandro

This newsletter is for educational purposes. It does not represent financial advice. Do your own research before buying Bitcoin.

@ a012dc82:6458a70d

Table Of Content

• BlackRock's Bold Move
• The Potential Impact on Bitcoin's Price
• The Role of Retail Investors
• The Future of Bitcoin
• Conclusion
• FAQ

The world of digital assets has been gaining significant traction, with traditional financial firms finally acknowledging that cryptocurrencies are here to stay. This shift in perception is not without reason. The potential of cryptocurrencies to revolutionize financial transactions, coupled with their growing acceptance as a legitimate asset class, has made them impossible to ignore. Among the key players making waves in the crypto space is BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, boasting $9 trillion in assets under management (AUM). The firm recently filed for permission to create a "spot market" Bitcoin-based exchange-traded fund (ETF), a move that could potentially slingshot Bitcoin's price skyward. This move signifies a significant shift in the traditional finance world's approach to digital assets, marking a new era of acceptance and integration.

ETF Propel Bitcoin Price

BlackRock's Bold Move

BlackRock's decision to venture into the Bitcoin ETF space is a significant development in the crypto industry. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission has historically been resistant to Bitcoin ETFs, making BlackRock's move a bold one. This decision is not just a gamble but a calculated move based on the growing demand for digital assets and the potential they hold. This move, coupled with similar actions from other financial giants like Fidelity Investments, Charles Schwab, and Citadel, has already had a positive impact on the crypto market. The announcement alone has boosted crypto trading markets, with Bitcoin gaining 20% in a week and surpassing the $30,000 mark for the first time since April. This price surge is a testament to the influence these financial institutions wield in the market.

The Potential Impact on Bitcoin's Price

The creation of a Bitcoin ETF by a firm as influential as BlackRock could potentially transform the Bitcoin market. Bitcoin's fixed supply limit of 21 million BTC and its existing inventory's relative illiquidity could lead to a supply-demand imbalance. With 68% of BTC in circulation remaining unmoved in the past year, there isn't a lot of stock available for BlackRock and other interested parties to snap up. If demand exceeds supply, it could inevitably lead to price gains for Bitcoin. This scenario could potentially create a bullish market for Bitcoin, driving its price to new heights. However, it's important to note that this is a hypothetical scenario, and the actual impact will depend on a variety of factors, including regulatory decisions and market dynamics.

ETF Propel Bitcoin Price

The Role of Retail Investors

While institutional investors like BlackRock play a significant role in the crypto market, the role of retail investors cannot be overlooked. The participation of ordinary crypto users might be necessary to stabilize the price of Bitcoin. As more institutional investors enter the market, retail investors may also be encouraged to participate, potentially leading to an increase in trading volume and further price appreciation. Retail investors bring a different dynamic to the market. Their participation could lead to increased liquidity and could also serve as a counterbalance to the large trades made by institutional investors. The involvement of retail investors could also lead to a more diverse and robust market, contributing to the overall health and stability of the Bitcoin ecosystem.

The Future of Bitcoin

The entry of BlackRock and other major asset managers into the Bitcoin space could potentially stabilize Bitcoin's price at a substantially higher level than the current $30,000. However, long-term price stability also requires broad retail participation. The involvement of large financial institutions in the digital asset market has arguably had a calming effect on retail investors, which could lead to increased acceptance and trading volume in the coming months. As the market matures and regulatory clarity improves, we could see a more balanced market with both institutional and retail investors playing significant roles. This balance could contribute to the long-term stability and growth of Bitcoin's price.

ETF Propel Bitcoin Price

Conclusion

The involvement of large financial institutions, such as BlackRock, in the crypto markets represents a significant shift and a decisive moment for these markets, both in the U.S. and globally. While it's still early days, the potential impact of BlackRock's proposed Bitcoin ETF on Bitcoin's price cannot be underestimated. If institutional investors continue to enter the market, their demand could certainly drive prices higher, potentially propelling Bitcoin's price to the moon. However, it's important to remember that the crypto market is highly volatile, and investors should always do their due diligence before making investment decisions. The future of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies remains uncertain, but the involvement of major financial institutions like BlackRock signals a promising future for these digital assets.

FAQ

What is BlackRock's recent move in the crypto space?

BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, has filed for permission to create a "spot market" Bitcoin-based exchange-traded fund (ETF).

How could BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF impact Bitcoin's price?

The creation of a Bitcoin ETF by BlackRock could potentially increase demand for Bitcoin. Given Bitcoin's fixed supply limit, this could lead to a supply-demand imbalance and potentially drive up Bitcoin's price.

What role do retail investors play in the Bitcoin market?

Retail investors play a significant role in the Bitcoin market. Their participation could lead to increased liquidity and could serve as a counterbalance to the large trades made by institutional investors.

Could BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF stabilize Bitcoin's price?

The entry of BlackRock and other major asset managers into the Bitcoin space could potentially stabilize Bitcoin's price at a substantially higher level than the current one. However, long-term price stability also requires broad retail participation.

That's all for today, see ya tomorrow

If you want more, be sure to follow us on:

NOSTR: croxroad@getalby.com

Twitter: @croxroadnews

Instagram: @croxroadnews.co

Subscribe to CROX ROAD Bitcoin Only Daily Newsletter

https://www.croxroad.co/subscribe

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets or to make any financial decisions. Please be careful and do your own research.

@ 0d119c15:6d7b1b39

Source: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/marvel/M.1460906540.A.189.html

作者snowsummersp (江南) 看板marvel 標題[創作] 學長的秘密 時間Sun Apr 17 23:22:17 2016

在竹科上班的我，過著相當安逸的生活，雖然沒有年薪百萬，但是養活自己 倒是不難，雖然沒有滿八個小時就下班，但也來得及回家看八點檔，所以，待在 這間公司已經半年的我，絲毫沒有任何想離職的理由。

時間已經七點半了，偷偷瞄了一下主管的座位，發現他已經不在位置上了， 因此我也就東西收一收，準備離開公司。看著還在努力上批踢踢拚上班時數的 學長，內心搖了搖頭，心想著，這樣生活也太沒有品質了吧? 於是我走了過去， 拍了拍學長的肩膀。 「Alan，還不下班阿?」Alan是學長的名字。

此時的學長還在上著西斯版，看著女版友分享的自拍照，色瞇瞇地笑著。 「這個正喔!」我頭湊過去，看了一下自拍照。 「Mark你幹嘛!?」學長一付被抓 姦在床的表情，急急忙忙把圖關掉。

「我說Alan阿，老大不是交代你一個很急的案子嗎? 可是我看你今天就一直在逛 批踢踢，這樣明天報告你不就要爆炸了?」雖說Alan是我學長，但由於已經混得蠻熟 了，所以我說起話來也是沒大沒小。

「爆炸?你不要太小看我啊，雖然我白天沒甚麼在上班，但半夜的我可是相當的 威猛阿，你應該有聽過我的稱號吧，"軟體部拓海"。」學長驕傲地抬起頭，相當有自 信的對我說。

「聽是聽過，但我始終不明白為什麼你叫做拓海，該不會你家賣豆腐的吧?」正當 我在說話的時候，隔壁部門同事收拾行李，默默的下班了。

「當然不是，拓海的意義就是我只有在凌晨的時候，才是軟體界的霸主，憑著一台 WinXP，在最難的程式碼裡面甩尾，並且寫出來的code，可是相當的漂亮，連我自己都 驚嘆阿!」

「喔...是喔。」我無言地看著異常活潑的學長，轉過身，我決定還是先回家好了。

正當我在刷卡的時候，「相信我，明天早上我程式就完成了!」學長還在背後喊著。

---

但，驚訝的是，學長他真的完成了主管交付的程式，連部門裡的資深工程師，在

前幾天都說要完成這個功能，至少要花一個禮拜以上的時間，沒想到學長他三天就完成

，而且實際上他應該沒花到三天，因為他這三天的白天都在打混，不是FB就是批踢踢。

「如何，我是不是說到做到阿?」學長痞痞的對我說。

「幹!」我只回他一個字。因為剛剛主管說我來了也算一段時間了，所以決定讓我

獨自開發一個之前學長留下來的屎缺，要我在下禮拜報告整個程式架構，以及加入一個

龐大的演算法。

「哈! 哈! 哈! Mark你要加油啊。」說完，學長又回到他的位置上玩野豬騎士了。

「唉...」我虛弱的嘆了一口氣，看來我的好日子過完了。

---

眼看著明天就到了週報的日子，但我不僅是演算法生不出來，連程式碼都一知

半解，這樣下去，我明天報告絕對是會飛高高。

「Mark，程式那邊寫的怎麼樣了?」PM假好心的過來問我。

「快了，今天再加個班應該就可以搞定了。」我瀟灑的編了個謊言。

「哦?那明天看你表演囉?」PM假笑的說。

我真的很想一拳打爆他的臉，但我不行。

抓了抓頭，我已經呈現半放棄狀態了，拿起桌上的菸，我往公司的吸菸區走，

剛好看到Alan也在那裏抽菸。

「Mark?不是說你已經戒菸了嗎?」學長劈頭就問了我。

「幹，最近真的太煩了啦，老大要我做的那個，我根本讀不懂，更何況還要寫

一段新的演算法。」我用力的吸了一口菸說。扶著牆，看了看樓下，這個高度跳下去

死不了的。

「廢話，你一定看不懂的阿，他可是公司的傳說級大學長寫的程式碼耶。」Alan

笑了笑對我說。

「傳說的學長?」我之前沒聽說過這個人。

「沒錯，但是某個原因，導致這個學長變成公司的佛地魔，也就是"不能說的人"。」

「挖靠，聽起來也太神秘了吧!」

「是阿，這學長的程式語言幾乎每一樣都會，舉凡iOS, Android, Web, Firmware

，只要是公司的產品，他基本上都是主力。而且厲害的是，不管交付給他多難的任務，

他都可以在一個禮拜就寫完。」Alan如數家珍的說著。

「這麼厲害的人，那公司怎麼捨得他跳槽? 應該不管怎樣都要把他留在公司啊!

如果他能幫我寫code就好了...」

「公司當然是把他留住了，只是...」Alan欲言又止的說。

「只是甚麼?」我不明所以的問，因為如果留在公司的話，那他應該就不會成為

"不能說的人"了吧。

「只是...他後來在公司座位上自殺了。」

突然一陣強風颳來，我雞皮疙瘩都起來了。

「恩...」我點了點頭，也就沒有再說甚麼。

---

已經晚上11點多，但我的PPT還在第一面，我覺得我想到我的頭都快破了，但還

是甚麼東西都擠不出來。

「Mark還不下班?」Alan走過來問我。

「你才是為啥不下班?你這禮拜不是沒事嗎?」我白了他一眼，環顧了一下公司，

居然只剩我們兩個人而已。

「軟體部拓海說不定可以幫你啊!」

「好啊，你看看。」之後我大致介紹了一下我研究到現在的心得。

但我得到的回答是，「哎呀，我好像完全不懂耶。」

「算了，我放棄了，明天乾脆提辭呈直接離職算了。」我一氣之下這麼說。

Alan皺著眉頭，閉上眼睛，像是下了很大的決心一樣，吐了一口大大的氣，然後

對我說，「我有辦法。」

「辦法?甚麼辦法?拓也哥。」我嘲諷式的叫他拓也。

「媽的，是拓海!」Alan怒瞪了我一眼，「你還記得我跟你說過那個傳說的學長

嗎?」

「當然還記得阿，公司的佛地魔，我這個程式原撰寫者。怎麼了?」

「他當初上吊的座位就是我現在的座位。」Alan小小聲地說，並且指了指他的座位。

我瞪大眼睛，但也沒說半句話。

「我知道你一定覺得奇怪，為什麼我要現在跟你說這個。」他說話越說越小聲，

「學長他是一個工作狂，他到現在都還會來公司寫程式。」

「寫程式?來公司?他不是已經?」我看了一眼Alan又看了一眼他的座位。

「對啦，我就直接了當的跟你說，我的程式都是他寫的。」Alan說著像是一件稀

鬆平常的事情。

「靠邀，真的假的啦。」

「真的啦，你要不要信我一次?」

「信你甚麼啦?」

「信不信啦?」

「信，我信，可以了吧?」

「OK。」說完，Alan就主動去把我的桌機關機，然後把桌機移動到他自己的位置

上，開了機，然後我自動自發的Key了開機密碼。

確認開好機之後，Alan看了看手錶，「走吧，去吃宵夜。對了，帶上你的東西。」

「宵夜?」我傻眼的問。

「你信不信我?」

「痾...信。」我心裡想著死馬當活馬醫，反正在這裡耗一個晚上，我也是寫不出

來的。

「走吧。」

---

吃完了永和豆漿之後，時間已經逼近快凌晨兩點了。我跟Alan搭了電梯，到了刷

卡的地方，我正準備拿出卡片時，Alan示意要我等一下，並且用手指了指門內。

我湊了過去看，Alan的座位前面，有一團白白的霧，讓我看不清楚螢幕。

Alan轉過身，按了向下的電梯，對我說，「再去吃一頓吧!讓學長再忙一下。」

丈二金剛摸不著頭腦的我只好跟著Alan下去了。

「Mark，你這次的演算法真的有點難度喔，大學長居然解到兩點都還沒搞定。」

Alan笑笑地說。

「所以剛剛那團白白的霧?」我靈光一閃的說。

「沒錯!傳說的學長再幫你寫code，有沒有很感動阿?」

「幹，真的假的啊...」

「不要不相信。對了，你東西都有帶吧?我看今天晚上就先回家吧，明天早一點上班，

把你的電腦搬回你的位置上，然後就是見證奇蹟的時刻了。」

---

隔天一早，我帶著既緊張又興奮的心情開了機，把Visual Studio打開，我下巴差

點掉下來，傳說學長真的把演算法寫好了!而且程式還寫得很乾淨。

報告的時候，整個部門由上到下，從主管、PM、資深RD、測試人員，當他們知道

我一個禮拜就搞定之前學長留下來的大屎缺，是怎麼樣的崇拜我，以及響起如雷的掌聲

，我就不贅言了。

「你有甚麼願望想要實現的嗎?」主管看著我像是看到哈利波特的表情對我說。

「願望嗎?」我瀟灑的說，「送我一把鮮花吧，我想弔念某人。」

當天晚上，我把三根菸當作三炷香，肯德基全家餐當作牲禮，以及鮮花，感謝傳

說學長所做的一切，雖然主管又交給了我一個更困難的任務，但我已經再也不害怕

了，因為有傳說的學長在。

---

幾天後，我開心的在逛西斯版的時候，Alan氣沖沖的揍了我一拳。

「幹!怎樣?幹嘛打我?」

「你做了甚麼好事!」Alan沒有控制音量的大喊出來，不僅周遭的同事，連在小

房間的總經理都探出頭來一探究竟。

「甚麼意思?」我一頭霧水。

「學長投胎了啦!幹!」

「投胎很好啊!」難道是我那天晚上感謝學長的關係?

「投胎怎麼幫我們寫code?」Alan大吼著說。

「幹!」我也跟著大吼。

-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.59.173 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/marvel/M.1460906540.A.189.html

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Tras una jornada de incertidumbre, España ha votado en sus elecciones generales. Alberto Núñez Feijóo y el PP consiguieron 136 escaños (47 más que en 2019), pero ni siquiera aliándose con VOX, que apenas obtuvo 33 (19 menos que en los pasados comicios), tiene mayoría para gobernar. La suma de la coalición deja a la derecha siete escaños por debajo de los que necesitarían.

Del otro la lado del espectro político, Pedro Sánchez, actual presidente, obtuvo 122 diputados. Este resultado fue incluso mejor que el obtenido por el PSEO hace cuatro años, pero muy lejos de los 176 puestos requeridos para continuar en el poder, incluso con los 31 escaños que consiguió Sumar, se quedaría muy por debajo.

Esto deja al PP en una complicada situación, pues pese haber obtenido más votos (300 000 más que los socialistas), no puede tomar el control de la nación. Este resultado ha roto los pronósticos de las encuestas previas que daban como ganadora a la derecha por amplio margen.

Lo acontecido hoy, apunta la cadena de radio SER, podría provocar una repetición electoral si los partidos no logran negociar y sumar escaños a uno u otro matiz político. Los números son tan estrechos que dejan la gobernabilidad en el aire, a menos que Pedro Sánchez pacte con Junt y fuerzas regionales del País Vasco, lo que podría dejarlo en el gobierno.

¿Qué ha dicho Feijóo?

El presidente del PP ha pedido a los demás partidos que no bloqueen su investidura. Sostuvo que todos los gobernantes más votados de lecciones previas han ganado y por eso pide lo mismo para él. “No hay ningún presidente de España que haya gobernado tras perder las elecciones”, ha insistido, pensando en que Sánchez puede bloquearlo y mantenerse en la Moncloa.

“Nuestra obligación es que no se abra un periodo de incertidumbres en España. Los españoles hoy nos han dado la confianza en el PP y también han dicho a todos los partidos del arco que dialoguemos. Como candidato del partido más votado mi deber es abrir el diálogo para liderarlo e intentar gobernar el país de acuerdo con los resultados electorales”, ha dicho entre vítores.

Este domingo acudieron a votar más de 24 millones de electores. Según los datos del Ministerio del Interior la participación fue de aproximadamente el 70,40% del total.

Pese a estar en verano los españoles acudieron a las urnas confirmando la tendencia de que el electorado vota más en unos comicios que pueden representar un cambio. También fue muy elevado el número de votos por correo (más de 2,47 millones).

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

El ministro de Energía y Minas de Cuba, Vicente de la O Levy, reconoció en la Asamblea Nacional del Poder Popular (ANPP) que al menos dos patanas turcas de generación eléctrica habían abandonado Cuba recientemente en cumplimiento de los contratos firmados. Ahora el país tiene 170 megawatts (MW) menos de energía para afrontar la etapa de verano donde más energía se consume.

En abril pasado, la Isla llegó a contar con ocho patanas de generación que se le contrataron a la empresa turca Karadeniz Holding para apoyar la producción de electricidad en las viejas plantas termoeléctricas del país, muchas de las cuales están paralizadas por avería o mantenimiento.

Precisamente en esos meses el nuevo ministro designado por Miguel Díaz-Canel dijo que la contratación del costoso servicio de generación eléctrica mediante patanas flotantes a Turquía fue el “mejor negocio que se hizo”.

El ministro De la O Levy destacó que durante el primer semestre se logró incrementar la generación en Energas a más de 300 MW, gracias a la terminación de dos pozos de gas. Esto permitió subir la producción de gas a más de 400.000 metros cúbicos diarios; sin embargo, sigue compleja la situación para acceder al gas licuado de petróleo para la cocción de alimentos.

Por otra parte, las acciones de reparación en algunas termoeléctricas han permitido que los apagones en el primer mes del verano no sean tan prolongados como en los dos periodos estivales previos (años 2022 y 2021), que incluso fueron el detonante para las protestas masivas del 11 de julio.

No obstante, siguen las tensiones con la disponibilidad de combustible importado desde el exterior, que también se unen a problemas logísticos en la distribución. Por ejemplo, hay una baja disponibilidad técnica de los carros cisterna de CUPET (Empresa Cuba Petróleo) y dificultades en el transporte por ferrocarriles y buques.

Una nota oficial de la Unión Eléctrica de Cuba (UNE), refiere que para el horario pico de este domingo 23 de julio se estima la entrada de la unidad 2 de la Hidroeléctrica Hanabanilla con 14 MW, el aporte de los motores de la central de Mariel con 100 MW, la entrada de los motores fuel de Moa con 100 MW y la suma de 166 MW de parte de la Generación Distribuida.

Por lo tanto, con esas proyecciones se estima para la hora pico una disponibilidad de 3.113 MW y una demanda máxima de 3.000 MW, para una reserva de 113 MW, “por lo que de mantenerse las condiciones previstas no se pronostican afectaciones al servicio en este horario”.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

La Dirección General de Transporte impuso más de 5,000 multas a choferes en La Habana entre junio y julio, desde la entrada en vigor de las nuevas tarifas para la movilidad de pasajeros por el sector privado.

Las 5,100 multas se fijaron a conductores que violaron los precios establecidos por el régimen y "por ejercer la actividad de transportación de pasajeros de forma ilegal", según informó el diario local oficialista Tribuna de La Habana.

La Dirección General de Transporte afirmó que "se enfrentaron casos que mostraron reincidencia en la violación, y se aplicaron medidas de mayor rigor con los responsables, que en su gran mayoría no eran los titulares de los medios".

En junio, al anunciar las nuevas tarifas de transportación de pasajeros operadas por privados, las autoridades informaron también que reforzarían las acciones de enfrentamiento y control en la vía para que los precios fijados se cumplan, avisando que aplicarían el Decreto 45 del 2021.

Las autoridades dividieron las 46 rutas de transportación existentes en cuatro grupos, según el precio: de 45 pesos, de 75, de 100 y de 170 pesos.

Los boteros en La Habana no recibieron con agrado la noticia y decidieron dejar de trabajar, como forma de protesta contra la imposición del gobierno.

Varios choferes expresaron su intención de solo transportar a personas en viajes previamente concertados con el cliente y posteriormente, se declararon en huelga, en medio de una disminución drástica del transporte estatal en el país.

La prensa oficialista cubana reconoció que decenas de boteros han dejado de trabajar en La Habana luego de que el Gobierno fijara nuevos precios a sus tarifas.

En La Habana se transportan diariamente un estimado de 600,000 pasajeros, de ellos 536,052 son transportados por los operadores estatales, lo que representa un 89.3%, mientras que 63,948 se trasladan por otras formas de gestión, para el 10.7%.

Los transportistas privados afirmaron que los nuevos precios son insostenibles para ellos, que tienen las mismas dificultades de otros cubanos para satisfacer sus necesidades básicas, y deben comprar a altos precios el combustible y las piezas de repuesto que el estado no vende.

La imposición de los nuevos precios también se aplicó en otras provincias, como Matanzas y Cienfuegos.

El gobierno local del municipio de Limonar, en Matanzas, fijó los precios del transporte privado de pasajeros mediante camionetas, autos, motos, coches y bicitaxi.

Mediante el acuerdo 290 del Consejo de la Administración del Poder Popular en Limonar se establecieron valores que van desde los 200 pesos cubanos hasta 10 CUP, según la ruta y el medio de transporte que se emplee.

El gobierno de Cienfuegos topó también los precios, medida que para algunos expertos agudizará la crisis inflacionaria que hay en el país.

Tras la publicación de la Resolución 81/2023 los diferentes medios de transporte debieron cobrar lo que se estableció a partir de la nueva ficha de costo.

@ 9ecbb0e7:06ab7c09

Nostr es un protocolo que permite crear redes sociales descentralizadas sin censura incluyendo pagos a través de la red Lightning de Bitcoin.

Esta instalación de Nostr Relay Server comprende el uso de un servidor Ubuntu/Debian ya sea personal o que se esté ejecutando en cualquier servidor VPS.

Requisitos necesarios:

1. Comprar un dominio de internet o tener un dominio de internet. Puedes comprar un dominio utilizando Namecheap.com u otro servicio.
2. Tener en ejecución una instalación de Ubuntu/Debian.
3. Logearse con ssh en su servidor.
4. Instalar Cargo
5. Instalar Rust
6. Tener muchos deseos de aprender.

Comenzamos por instalar los paquetes necesarios:

Instalamos Cargo

sudo apt install cargo

Luego procedemos a realizar la instalacion de Rust

curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh

Cuando se nos pregunte elegimos la opción 1

Una vez que haya finalizada la instalación de Rust vamos a activar el servicio

source /root/.cargo/env

y verificamos que estén instaladas de forma correcta tanto Rust como Cargo

rustc --version cargo --version

En seguida, procedemos a la instalación de Protobuf en el sistema. Protobuf es un formato de serialización de datos estructurados desarrollado por Google, utilizado en la comunicación entre servicios y en el almacenamiento de datos. Para instalarlo, sigue los siguientes pasos.

Primero, asegúrate de tener instalado el paquete unzip, que nos permitirá extraer el archivo ejecutable protoc de un archivo ZIP:

sudo apt update

sudo apt install -y unzip

Obtén la última versión de protoc y asígnala a una variable:

PROTOC_VERSION=$(curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/latest" | grep -Po '"tag_name": "v\K[0-9.]+')

Descarga el archivo ZIP de la página de lanzamientos del repositorio de protoc:

curl -Lo protoc.zip "https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/latest/download/protoc-${PROTOC_VERSION}-linux-x86_64.zip"

Luego, extrae el archivo ejecutable del archivo ZIP:

sudo unzip -q protoc.zip bin/protoc -d /usr/local

A continuación, establece el permiso de ejecución:

sudo chmod a+x /usr/local/bin/protoc

En este punto, el comando protoc ya está disponible para todos los usuarios como un comando global del sistema. Puedes verificar la versión de protoc con:

Podemos verificar la versión de protoc:

protoc --version

Ya no necesitaremos el archivo ZIP, así que lo eliminamos:

rm -rf protoc.zip

Ahora vamos a instalar todas las dependencias necesarias para la instalación de nuestro servidor nostr

sudo apt-get install certbot build-essential sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev libssl-dev pkg-config nginx git -y sudo apt-get install net-tools whois -y

Luego realizamos la compitación de nostr.

cd /opt sudo mkdir nostr-data sudo git clone https://github.com/scsibug/nostr-rs-relay.git cd nostr-rs-relay sudo cargo build --release

**Este proceso puede llegar a demorar hasta unos 10 minutos. Tenga calma y espere que se realice completamente. ** Instalamos el servidor nostr en la carpeta bin

sudo install target/release/nostr-rs-relay /usr/local/bin

Si has seguido todos los pasos ya tendrás nuestro relay server casi listo, ahora puedes descargar el archivo de configuración de prueba.

sudo wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/scsibug/nostr-rs-relay/master/config.toml

Abrimos el archivo con el editor de texto de tu preferencia, en mi caso nano.

sudo nano config.toml

Modificamos las siguientes variables.

relay_url : nostr.domainname.com ( ⚠️ reemplaza con el nombre que le quieras dar a tu relay server) name : Nombre que va a tener el relay description : Escribe de que se trata tu relay server, no te limites, escribe todo lo que quieras para que los usuarios conozcan acerca de ti. pubkey : Tu clave publica en formato hex, esto es para que otros usuarios puedan comunicarse contigo contact : correo@example.com (Es la direccion de correo administrativo de este relay server) tracing : ⚠️ Mantenlo comentado de otra forma el relay server puede dar error data_directory : /opt/nostr-data/ (Donde se van a guardar los datos de nuestro relay server) address : 127.0.0.1 utilizaremos esta ya que vamos a usar nginx como servidor proxy remote_ip_header : "x-forwarded-for" para permitir el logeo real de clientes

Si has seguido los pasos podemos verificar si nuestro relay server se encuentra en ejecución y para hacerlo podemos utilizar el siguiente comando en el terminal.

sudo RUST_LOG=warn,nostr_rs_relay=info /usr/local/bin/nostr-rs-relay

Si todo marcha de forma correcta nos mostrara la salida del servidor con los datos que esta procesando.

Ahora vamos a proceder a crear el servicio que permitirá el funcionamiento de nuestro relay server incluso si se reinicia nuestro servidor.

Para ello vamos a crear el archivo /etc/systemd/system/nostr-relay.service

sudo nano /etc/systemd/system/nostr-relay.service

Dentro del archivo vamos a pegar el siguiente codigo

``` [Unit] Description=Nostr Relay After=network.target

[Service] Type=simple User=TuUsuario WorkingDirectory=/home/TuUsuario Environment=RUST_LOG=info,nostr_rs_relay=info ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/nostr-rs-relay Restart=on-failure

[Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target

```

Debes Cambiar TuUsuario por el nombre del usuario real que estas utilizando.

Ahora habilitamos el servicio, y lo ejecutamos para que se mantenga encendido

sudo systemctl daemon-reload sudo systemctl enable nostr-relay.service sudo systemctl start nostr-relay.service

Verificamos si el servicio se está ejecutando en el sistema

sudo systemctl status nostr-relay.service

Si vas hasta aqui deberías ver el servicio en ejecución sin errores. Para salir de la ventana preciona Ctrol + C

Verificamos si el servicio esta escuchando en el puerto 8080 utilizando el siguiente comando

sudo netstat -tnap | grep nostr

y Deberías obtener una respuesta parecida a la siguiente

tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 81180/nostr-rs-relay

Configuración del proxy inverso Nginx para el acceso de nuestro relay service a través del dominio deseado.

Para ello primero vamos a entrar en la carpeta cd /etc/nginx/sites-available

cd /etc/nginx/sites-available sudo mkdir -p /var/www/nostr/.well-known/acme-challenge/ sudo chown -R 33:33 /var/www/nostr

Creamos el archivo de configuracion nostr-relay.conf

sudo nano nostr-relay.conf

Vamos a pegar el siguiente contenido

```

map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade { default upgrade; '' close; }

upstream websocket { server 127.0.0.1:8080; }

server { listen 80; server_name relay.example.com; ## <<=== Cambia esto

location /.well-known/acme-challenge/ { root /var/www/nostr; allow all; }

location / { proxy_pass http://websocket; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr; }

} ```

En el, basicamente estamos dandole acceso a nuestro relay a través del dominio que hemos escogido. Recuerda que debes cambiar el valor en server_name con el nombre real del dominio que deseas utilizar. Hasta aqui solo estamos utilizando http sin certificado SSL.

Cuando hayas realizado las modificaciones y salvado el archivo de configuración vas a activar y habilitar el sitio para comprobar que efectivamente se esta ejecutando de forma correcta nuestro relay server y escuchando a través de nuestro dominio.

sudo ln -s /etc/nginx/sites-available/nostr-relay.conf /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/. sudo rm -f /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default sudo nginx -t

Si todo marcha bien y has realizado los pasos vas a obtener el siguiente mensaje

nginx: the configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf syntax is ok nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test is successful

Ahora debemos mandar a ejecutar los cambios en nginx

sudo nginx -s reload

Realizar una prueba externa.

Para comprobar que todo esta funcionando bien podemos abrir una nueva ventana Terminal en otra computadora y ejecutar

wget relay.example.com

Donde relay.example.com se refiere al dominio que has destinado para tu relay server y que es el mismo que has utilizado en la configuración de nginx.

Como resultado deberias obtener un archivo index.html al cual le puedes hacer un cat para leer el contenido.

cat index.html

y debería mostrar el siguiente mensaje

Please use a Nostr client to connect.

Hasta aquí vemos que nuestro servidor esta funcionando. Ahora le vamos a añadir un certificado SSL.

Para nuestro siguiente paso vamos a utilizar DHParams

Primero vamos a crear la carpeta donde ubicaremos el certificado.

sudo mkdir /etc/nginx/ssl

y luego vamos a crear el DHParams (deberia tomarnos solo un minuto)

sudo openssl dhparam -out /etc/nginx/ssl/dhparam.pem 4096

Ahora vamos a solicitar el certificado

cd /var/www/nostr sudo certbot certonly --webroot -w . -d relay.example.com --dry-run --agree-tos

Deberías haber obtenido la siguiente respuesta.

Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log Simulating a certificate request for relay.example.com The dry run was successful.

Recuerda cambiar relay.example.com por el dominio tuyo si esta prueba fue satisfactoria entonces puedes proceder a solicitar el certificado SSL utilizando el siguiente comando.

cd /var/www/nostr sudo certbot certonly --webroot -w . -d relay.example.com

Así, vas a obtener información tal como la ruta en la que se guardó el certificado SSL para tu dominio etc.

Y estamos listos para reemplazar la configuración de nginx con la que va a tener el certificado SSL de nuestro servidor.

cd /etc/nginx/sites-available sudo nano nostr-relay.conf

Actualizamos el archivo de la siguiente forma

``` map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade { default upgrade; '' close; }

upstream websocket { server 127.0.0.1:8080; }

server { listen 80; server_name relay.example.com; ## <<=== CHANGE THIS

location /.well-known/acme-challenge/ { root /var/www/nostr; allow all; }

location / { return 301 https://relay.example.com; }

}

server { listen 443 ssl; server_name relay.example.com;

location / { proxy_pass http://websocket; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr; }

SSL

ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:10m; ssl_session_timeout 10m; ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.1 TLSv1; ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on; ssl_ciphers "EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM EECDH+ECDSA+SHA384 EECDH+ECDSA+SHA256 EECDH+aRSA+SHA384 EECDH+aRSA+SHA256 EECDH+aRSA+RC4 EECDH EDH+aRSA RC4 !aNULL !eNULL !LOW !3DES !MD5 !EXP !PSK !SRP !DSS"; ssl_stapling on; ssl_stapling_verify on; ssl_dhparam ssl/dhparam.pem; ssl_ecdh_curve secp384r1;

add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains"; add_header X-Frame-Options DENY; add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff; add_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block"; add_header Referrer-Policy same-origin; add_header Feature-Policy "geolocation none;midi none;notifications none;push none;sync-xhr none;microphone none;camera none;magnetometer none;gyroscope none;speaker self;vibrate none;fullscreen self;payment none;";

ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/relay.example.com/fullchain.pem; ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/relay.example.com/privkey.pem;

}

```

Recuerda cambiar todas las ocurrencias de relay.example.com por tu dominio real.

Verificamos que la configuración de nginx este correcta.

sudo nginx -t

Si todo es correcto ejecutas

sudo nginx -s reload

Verificamos que nginx + http y el servidor se están ejecutando correctamente

sudo netstat -tnap | grep 'nginx\|nostr'

Si la respuesta es la siguiente

tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:443 0.0.0.0: LISTEN 53252/nginx: master tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0: LISTEN 53252/nginx: master tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 81180/nostr-rs-rela

Significa que esta funcionando de forma correcta nuestro servidor.

En caso de que desees obtener un informe de estado de tu relay server puedes utilizar siempre que así lo desees

journalctl -f | grep --line-buffered nostr_rs_relay | cut -d' ' -f 10,12-100

Ahí podrás obtener un informe de errores en caso de ser necesario.

Si deseas comprobar la conexión con el Relay server puedes utilizar el siguiente enlace que aquí te proveo.

Websocket Client

En resumen, Nostr es una plataforma que proporciona una red de noticias en tiempo real, libre y descentralizada. Nostr Relay Server es una herramienta que nos permite unirnos a esta red y compartir noticias y eventos con el resto del mundo. Mediante la instalación y configuración de Nostr Relay en un servidor Ubuntu, podemos contribuir al crecimiento y desarrollo de esta emocionante nueva plataforma de comunicación.

Quieres utilizar mis relay servers?

Si es así puedes conectarte a:

wss://relay.bitransfer.org

wss://relay.bitransfermedia.com

Espero que esta guía les sea de ayuda.

@ 000003a2:e3b014e6

A simple example:

``` // create subscription ndk.subscribe({ kinds: [0], authors: [pubkey] });

sub.on('event', (event: NDKEvent) => { try { // parse content const content = JSON.parse(event.content); // now you can access profile info from parsed content } catch (error) { // handle error } });

```